Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-02-13 - MinutesTECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW A regular meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee was held on Wednesday, February 13, 2002 at 9:00 a.m. in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas. ITEMS CONSIDERED ACTION TAKEN LSD 02-4.00: Large Scale Development (Danaher, pp 681) Forwarded Page 2 PPL 02-6.00: Preliminary Plat (Brookstone Subdivision, pp 212) Forwarded Page 11 STAFF PRESENT STAFF ABSENT Keith Shreve Kim Hesse Sara Edwards Ron Petrie Renee Thomas Kim Rogers Perry Franklin Dennis Ledbetter Solid Waste UTILITIES PRESENT UTILITIES ABSENT Jim Sargent, SWEPCO Mike Phipps, Ozark Electric Coop. Sue Clouser, Southwestern Bell Johnny Boles, Arkansas Western Gas Larry Gibson, Cox Communications Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 2 LSD 02-4.00: Large Scale Development (Danaher, pp 681) was submitted by Ken Parker on behalf of Danaher Tool Group for property located at 2900 S. City Lake Road. The property is zoned 1-2, General Industrial and contains approximately 38.06 acres with a 15,000 sq.ft. warehouse proposed. Edwards: Welcome to the Wednesday, February 13, 2002 meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee. The first item on the agenda is LSD 02-4.00 submitted by Ken Parker on behalf of Danaher Tool Group for property located at 2900 S. City Lake Road. The property is zoned I-2, General Industrial and contains approximately 38.06 acres with a 15,000 sq.ft. warehouse proposed. Good morning. Parker: I am Ken Parker. I will be acting as the contractor for this. I am the maintenance manager. Mr. Mike Haley is our Chief Controller there at the plant and Dwight Canfield is the Plant Director at the Fayetteville location where we are proposing to put in this warehouse. Edwards: What do you do at the site? Parker: At the site we make accessory tools for the automotive industry. Things like oil filter wrenches, snap ring pliers are made there. Special edge screwdrivers that you would find in a mechanic's tool set and things of that nature. Edwards: All you are using the warehouse for is storage? Parker: We are proposing to add a warehouse. We recently moved some storage down there. If we add this warehouse we can take some of that storage and put it in this building and then we would like to utilize the other building to do some packaging in there. Conklin: I am Tim Conklin, I will introduce myself. I am the City Planner, this is Sara Edwards, Sara is an Associate Planner. The tools that you make, are they stamped out or punched out? Parker: There are several stamping machines down there. Dwight could run it through for you quickly. Canfield: Most of our parts are a stamping coming off a press. We have got five automatic presses. We do manufacture some things that are transferred to a sister plant, which would be Armstrong Tool. We do further processing from the stampings. We do a heat treatment and then assembly. Haley: It is all specialty tools like your KD brands. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 3 Canfield: It is tools that you or I probably wouldn't buy doing work on our own car but a professional mechanic will buy. Conklin: Do you have any permits required from ADEQ? Canfield: Not that I'm aware of. We are permitted on a waste treatment for our benching operations. There is nothing required on what we are asking to add. Conklin: To be more specific, are there any air omissions or anything that you are doing? Parker: This is a pole barn, we make those 10" wrenches like they make in Springdale, and then they pack them into packages. Basically, it is just going to have electric and keep the weather off. Conklin- I was just trying to make sure that we understand, as a City, what you are doing, if you are changing your operation. I have never heard any complaints or anything about your operation and I want to make sure you're not changing something. Canfield: We won't be changing it; we are just going to finish packing before it is put on a truck and then sent off to the Sears warehouses. That is all we are adding to that facility. We have already met with ADEQ and let them know that we are doing this as far as any requirements they have but since it is just a warehouse, they don't have any. Conklin: Ok, and you already have it for the treatment? Canfield: Yes. Conklin: Ok. Edwards: I am going to go over staff comments. You've got them in writing. The first two included had no comments so you could skip over that. The third one is from our Sidewalk Administrator and I'm going to let him go over his comments for you. This is Keith Shreve from our Sidewalks Division. Shreve: I am Keith Shreve with the Sidewalks Division. Since we are adding a new structure, the requirement is to build a sidewalk along the street frontage along City Lake Road. Due to the size of the street, it would be a 6' sidewalk for the length of the front with a minimum 10' greenspace on the edge of the street. That would be off the right-of-way line, which is probably greater than 10'. This is a requirement for infrastructure. I don't know if you are aware, back in 1983 when the plant was first built, there Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 4 Haley: was a Bill of Assurance to the City that they would construct a sidewalk in a length of time. We've been through that one time before and the recourse on that was to get it through the title insurance on that. There was nothing when we purchased the building. The City of Fayetteville was in the whole deal of buying that and putting some business in there. We went through this one time before and we weren't required to do that. They were going to take it up with the title insurance company or the previous owner. We were dissolved from that probably five years ago. Shreve: That was before my time. I don't know all of the history but under our current ordinance, and with building a new structure that brings back into play the requirement to build a sidewalk again. Since you are building a new structure, my interpretation, and the Sidewalk Administrator's interpretation, is that you be required to build a sidewalk at this time. Haley: That may pose a problem with this building. I will be honest with you; I have to get it through the people on the east coast. I am trying to keep business in Northwest Arkansas and the money that that costs may be a problem. I don't know if we can get a buy on that one there. When we talked about this five years ago, it was pretty expensive to do it. Shreve: Yes Sir, you have a lot of street frontage here. Haley: I would hate to have that get in the way of us bringing, Ken what is it? The low end when we are packing, 25 to 85 jobs in here. I have been out that road and I've been squeezed to the end to make this project go. That may be a showstopper for us if we can't get by it. Conklin: Can you put that in a letter so we can provide that information to our Subdivision Committee members? Haley: Sure. Conklin: We will take it from there. Haley: Is there anybody particular that we should address that to? Conklin: You can address it to Tim Conklin, City Planner. I will get it to the appropriate people. Haley: How long would it take to get a final answer on that? Conklin: I will have to get back with you on that whether you have to have a waiver or variance. It would have to go to the Planning Commission. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 5 Edwards: The next page, I did double check with parking and it does look like you have enough parking even with the expansion. I did include the calculations so we are ok on that. Your legal description, this legal description describes your property as well as over 20 acres that were sold back to the City. We've got what we sold back to the city and we could probably work with you to get that legal description. It would be a less and except what was sold to the city. What I need to find out from you is if this boundary described is the boundary of the piece of property that you own now. In order to determine your setbacks for a building permit, we need to have a boundary of your property. Parker: The boundary described here is the boundary described here in this legal description. As you said, it is slightly inaccurate in that there is 20 acres on the topside here. The setbacks that I put on the permit, these are all correct. This one right here I would really need to double check, just this north setback. Conklin: Ok. Parker: I didn't know if I need to go ahead, I tried to get a record of the legal description that is on file with the city now. I have a copy of that here but it is exactly that. What they did is they photocopied this and that is what I got. Conklin: This boundary on the north is what? Edwards: It is somewhere over here because they sold all of this to the city. Parker: It is just north of this driveway right here. Edward: This is not an actual site plan because it is property owned by the city. Conklin: When was it sold to the city? Edwards: In 1991 I think, but I will check on that. Canfield: We bought this from the microwave company and the City of Fayetteville was in the whole transaction. We didn't need the 50 acres or whatever it was and the city, in order to get us to buy this, bought that as a part of the Industrial Park. Conklin: I'm sure our land agents have the information. Edwards: Yes, he told me they could write less and except. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 6 Parker: [t is here past this parking lot, we're not sure exactly where the north is. Conklin: We could take that and have our draftsmen map that out. Edwards: They don't have all of this information too. Conklin: That is all existing though. Edwards: I can't volunteer our draftsmen to draw their Targe scale for them. Conklin- I am just saying that since the city bought the land, we should have that lot. Edwards: We don't have their property line so we only have what we own. Conklin: Wouldn't the other side be theirs? Edwards: Right, they need an accurate site plan with their building to show their setbacks. You can get our draftsmen to draw their site plan for them. Conklin: I don't think we need to draw it but their property line can be drawn in here and plotted out. Parker: I don't mind to get McClelland to help us on that. Edwards: We can give you our deed. Conklin: That is my point. We can get their property line. Edwards: If you want to go in and draw your new line and determine your setbacks and do it that way, we can do it. Conklin: Yes, that is where I was going with that Sara. I was trying to do as much as possible. Edwards: Right. That is basically all that I have. Ron, do you have anything to add? Petrie: I'm Ron Petrie with the Engineering Division. Let me just confirm a couple of things. You won't have new water and sewer service for this building? There will be no new fire line connections or sprinkler systems? Parker: No, none of that. Petrie: Ok, then I have no comments. Thank you. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 7 Glenn Newman- SWEPCO Newman: This is going to be served from the existing facilities? Parker: Yes Sir. I have a stamped drawing from the electric and they have approved it. Newman. If I could get some load calculations just to verify that we have the capacity left in the transformer and that it is not going to cause any problems there. Parker: Ok. Newman. I have the size of the existing facilities and it is just going to be lighting for storage? Parker: Yes Sir. Newman: It probably won't be a problem. We can just get with him and we can wire it through his internal wiring and make sure the structure is all right. Parker: You would like load information on the existing building where we're going to tie in at? Newman: Yes, concurring the voltage. It is 480 volts. 1 -le and I just need to visit about what the voltage is that is available. Parker: Ok, and what is your name again? Newman: Glenn Newman. Parker: Ok, I'll get that information to you then. Newman: Thank you, that is all that I have. Johnny Boles -Arkansas Western Gas Boles: In your footnotes, under number two, your questioning that a gas line be relocated is that not right? No Sir. These footnotes over here are the footnotes when the building was first built. Parker: Boles: So you are not proposing that any gas lines be relocated? Ok. This 6" high-pressure gas line that you show here. If I'm looking at this correctly, Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 8 how many feet would you say it would be from the corner of your proposed building? Parker: I don't know, I can't answer that. Boles: We just want to make sure that it doesn't encroach on this easement covering that line. You're showing this 6" line coming down through here so you have a short, narrow distance right here. Parker: I can call that number where you dig when I do the foundational concrete work that I will be required to do I can make sure that we don't get too close to that. Conklin- Is that existing? Boles: That is what I thought too. It is difficult to see. Conklin: It shouldn't be under the building right? Parker: I don't know. I would be shocked if that is underneath that building. This yard, it is a steel yard where we're planning on putting this building there. There are piers that are 42" deep, 3x3 piers that go down that deep. Our footing piers for our building would be along that same order of magnitude. I would be shocked. Boles: Why don't you give me a call later today and we can check that out a little further. I can give you my pager number, 527-3001. Parker: What was your name? Boles: Johnny Boles. Larry Gibson — Cox Communications Gibson: No comment. Sue Clouser -Southwestern Bell Clouser: The only comment I have is that if we have anything existing that would have to be relocated would be at the property owner's expense. Edwards: I did want to add; I can get you a copy of the deed but if you want to call Ed Connell at this number, 575-8216, he had it out yesterday so he could probably locate it for you really fast if I didn't get it to you. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 9 Conklin: If you exit out the front door the Engineering Division is two doors down. That is where Ron's office is. Just go back through there and ask for Ed and he might be able to make you a copy right now on the way out. Parker: I need to put in writing our concerns about the sidewalk, address it to Tim. I need to get a copy of this that shows the proper boundary lines. How many copies do I need and whom do I need to distribute those to? Edwards: You need 37 copies by February 20`h at 10:00 a.m. Parker: February 20`h at 10:00 a.m. Then I need to get the load information to Mr. Glenn and Johnny, do you want to go out and look at the site with me is that what you would like to do? Boles: Let me get a chance to review our records and see what is reflected on site. If need to, yes we will meet out on site. Parker: Ok, I'll page you later on this afternoon. Conklin- How many jobs do you have down there right now? Canfield: Depending on volume, around 65 to 70 jobs. Haley: Manufacturing in the past two years is down. We are trying to keep our jobs and keep our packing and not have to move to North Carolina. Parker: This will help the Fayetteville plant as well as the Springdale plant. Edwards: Thank you. Parker: Is that it? Edwards: That's it. Parker: Thank you for your time. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 10 PPL 02-6.00: Preliminary Plat (Brookstone Subdivision, pp 212) was submitted by Terry Carpenter of US Infrastructure, Inc. on behalf of Washington Regional Medical System for property located at 415 Longview Street. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural and contains approximately 38.62 acres with 8 lots proposed. Edwards: The next item is PPL 02-6.00, Brookstone subdivision submitted by Terry Carpenter of U.S. Infrastructure, Inc. on behalf of Washington Regional Medical Systems for property located at 416 Long View. The property is zoned A-1 and contains 38.62 acres. Carpenter: I am Terry Carpenter with U.S. Infrastructure and of course, this is Peter Nierengarten with my firm. Of course we will be glad to address any questions you have. As you have already mentioned, this is a part of the Washington Regional Medical Services' land that they want to subdivide for professional offices. It came under originally as Brookstone. A large scale development had been submitted some years prior to this, which is delineated as tract number 6. It is a leased property so that is why we are including that with this as part of the original subdivision. We've tried to meet with most of the major utilities prior to constructing this plat so we hope that we've addressed most of the things already. Petrie: Is it the same situation on tract 8? The health department, is that leased? Carpenter: Yes, that is a leased property. Edwards: I will start with our Landscape Administrator. She is requesting that you provide a tree preservation plan for review by the Planning Commission. This plan is to represent the existing canopy delineating the significant trees indicated on the site analysis. All required infrastructure improvements and tree protection measures that will be necessary during construction. Please provide amount of tree canopy to remain after sewer installation. Hesse: That can be on the Preliminary Plat. You can just include it all on there. Basically, you have got just about everything. You show your significant trees. The Planning Commission has to approve a drawing of the tree preservation plan. If it is combined with the Preliminary Plat that is fine. Carpenter: Do you need a separate plan? Hesse: No, like I said, it can be all in one. Conklin: It can be on the same sheet, we just need the label. We need something so when the public comes in and they want to see what trees you are cutting down and saving, they can say, "Oh, this is the tree preservation area." Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 11 Carpenter: I guess what I'm saying is that the title would just need to be revised to say "Preliminary Plat and Tree Preservation Plan." Conklin: It needs to be something that is like the site analysis. Hesse: Right. You can combine the site analysis and the Preliminary Plat together and then label it that and it would be ok. Also, show the trees that have to be taken out for the sewer, we will need that calculation. Carpenter: Ok. Edwards: Next, starting with Sidewalks. The sidewalk is existing so they just have standard comments. New driveway approaches must be of Portland Cement Concrete. There are no comments from our Traffic Superintendent. There are no comments from Parks. From Planning, tract 8, there is a piece of land existing between tract 8 and Wimberley which does not give tract 8 the required street frontage, I included a little map in your packet. It is this area right here which is owned by North Hills Medical Park. What I am proposing to do, you guys are proposing to rezone this right? Carpenter: Correct. Edwards: To R -O? Carpenter: Yes. Edwards: Ok, we just won't process the final plat until that rezoning is complete and then it won't need the required street frontage. I am just going to go ahead and let it go with the condition that it be rezoned to R -O instead of R-1.5. I need you to add plat page 212 somewhere near your title block. There is a label of CUE that should not accompany easements that are less than the required building setback. Carpenter: We combined the utilities. Edwards: Right. The thing is that you've got that labeled for a setback, which is greater than the utility easement in both the front and the rear. I just want you to change the label on that because there is a 35' setback and only a 20' easement. It is not a combined utility easement and setback. Conklin: I think that is saying G.U.E. Carpenter: General Utility Easement. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 12 Edwards: Carpenter: Edwards: Carpenter: Edwards: Carpenter: N ierengarten: Conklin: Nierengarten: Conklin: N ierengarten: Edwards: Sargent: Ok, your setback is 35' on the rear. Please add a setback to the rear and sides The side is 20'. Ok, so this needs to be 35'? Yes. I think you've got the 20' on the sides so you just need to show that. Our other condition of the large scale, I did some research on this. The Planning Commission approved a condition that Longview be extended to Plainview and the City Council granted a waiver. As a part of that waiver it was stated that Longview would be deferred to be constructed with future development. At this time, we are asking that Longview be continued on to meet Plainview at the current width, 36' wide and the sidewalks need a 70' right-of-way. I think you guys have everything out of our files but if you want, I can get you copies of all of that. I would like to get a copy of that. Even though I looked through a lot of it, it is pretty voluminous so I didn't read everything. Ok, I can get that for you after we're done here. Are we planning on any subdivision signs? I don't really think so. They just primarily want to get this thing done. They want to sell these tracts. I don't think there is going to be a subdivision sign or anything but that is a question we will ask. They haven't even mentioned really to sale any of the tracts. Just for tax purposes they wanted to have it broken up into individual lots. Tract 2 is under development. Right. Won't they be selling that? Yes, that is kind of what is behind what is going on here. There is an overhead electric line running along the east edge of this property that you are showing, I need to know the size of that. We have an ordinance if it is less than 12 KV it bas to be placed underground. Itisa12. Carpenter: I was going to say that is a pretty big line. I am no electrical guru but I can tell that one is carrying lots. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 13 Edwards: We have got Kenray, which I understand is a dirt, gravel road. I am going to place a limit that no construction traffic utilize Kenray so it doesn't disturb the existing residents coming through there. When the final plat comes through we are going to put a note on there as well so that when this tract develops the construction traffic won't use it. That is all that I have. Ron Petrie — Staff Engineer Petrie: Terry, I think you got my comments. Carpenter: I wasn't keeping up with them. Petrie: I will skip over the general comments, those are just typical and you have already answered number two. Under water, the easements that are shown look fine. On number two, I do not see how tract 1 will have access to water. Carpenter: Actually, we had the waterline drawn in there and it was my misunderstanding, obviously. I think that Peter told me you said not to worry about it. We thought we maybe might even have to bring water back. There is a conduit right down here at the beginning of the street. We had actually originally put it in there and run it along the street and then we took it out because we thought it was obvious that they could get water to all the tracts. We will go ahead and run it over there. Petrie: I'm not sure how they get it to tract 1. Carpenter: We have got to have, if you will see, we have to run the waterline where it terminates back south near the entrance of Longview. We will run it north and go through that conduit, which was installed for that very purpose and then we are going to have to acquire a 15' waterline easement that is delineated right there and then bring it back around to tract 1, then terminate it with a fire hydrant or whatever you guys want. Petrie: That is comment number three, having to do with fire hydrants. I have to look at our written standards when it comes to fire hydrant placement in subdivisions. There are also separate requirements that the Fire Chief may have. I don't think that the Fire Chief had any comments on this. One is tract 1 doesn't appear to meet the limit of being near a fire hydrant. If we could get the water extended to tract 1 and the fire hydrant at the end of it that would be progress. Carpenter: How far do you want it extended into tract 1? Petrie: It just needs to be adjacent to the property and the right-of-way. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 14 Carpenter: Would you want it set up with the fire hydrant off of a T so that the line could be extended if it needed to be? Petrie: In this particular instance, I don't see the need for it to be an extended, unless it is extended into tract 1 itself, maybe to serve a fire line or something like that. I will let you make the call on that. Carpenter: That is what I was getting at. A lot of times if they are sprinkled, like Brookstone, they ran a fire line or some waterlines around the facility. That is why we were going to set it up to have one installed through all the frontage. I think what we will do is terminate it here to tract 1 and if it becomes necessary then at least it is constructible. Actually, on the other end, it is also terminated so it could come back north and around. We could lose some. Petrie: It could bore across the street, make a connection to serve the rest of these lots but however you choose to end it on tract 1, I'Il leave that up to you. Just so long as it gets there I will be fine. Sewer, I think the easements look fine. I have a comment that when these lots are developed we will need to look and make sure that we can get truck access to our sewer lines for maintenance, washing out the manholes. That will be done at a later time. For the new sewer that was planned, make sure that we have some rain catchers with some rain pans so you can inspect those out. The grading, I made the statement that it is not required. There is no grading proposed. I did put a statement on there just so I put you on notice, if they change their mind and would like to grade these to make them more attractive to sale, our ordinance requires the Subdivision Committee to approve that, since you aren't showing any now. You are not providing a preliminary plan so we will have to come back to them and if they change their mind in between now and the final plat. The drainage I believe I need a permit application. Maybe I said you didn't need one, I don't remember what we discussed but I think we need a permit application. I can get you a copy of that if you don't have one. That includes a $200 review fee and it has to be signed by the owner. There is just one owner, you told me that. These properties are just leased but we need whoever owns the property's signature. The preliminary drainage report is acceptable, it looks good. Of course, we will need a final drainage report. I am trying to make sure that you are aware that in the final drainage report, one of those requirements that you will see on the checklist is to determine the hundred year water surface elevations throughout the subdivision, I just wanted to prepare you for that. Carpenter: Let me ask you a question Ron on that. You know with all the sophisticated computer technology these days, we can do that pretty easily and show the width of the hundred -year flood and all that sort of stuff. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 15 What we have shown on here is exactly what is on the FEMA map. That is not a detailed study so it is not very accurate. A lot of people are kind of mislead about the accuracy of FEMA maps. We want you to know that it won't favor this but we can't supplant what FEMA has deemed. Petrie: Right. I think you should show both. It is my understanding that zone X is really meaningless. Carpenter: You can see the thread of the string gets outside of the envelope. Petrie: You don't have to have insurance with the zone X. As a matter of fact, I had to call Sara. I had never seen a shaded zone X before. That is a new one for me. Usually you would see this a zone A or something. That is kind of the reason behind the hundred year water surface elevations that we get the actual numbers so whoever buys these lots knows what the situation is. Conklin: You just want a map that shows how far it extends? Petrie: It will have to be shown on the final plat. Carpenter: By Brookstone, where they filled in for the construction of the buildings, that is going to obviously force that back to the south just a little bit. It shouldn't be any big problem I wouldn't think. Petrie: That is just something that needs to be addressed before the final plat. We don't need to worry about that between now and the Subdivision meeting. We have agreed to delay the detention pond and construct those on the individual basis. I would like for you to add that note on the preliminary and the final plat. Drainage, at this time we need to have a good plan on how these lots are going to be drained when it does develop. Tract 4, how will that drain to the creek? Do we need a concrete swale back behind that put in at this time or a pipe or something like that? We need some legal way to get it across tract 3. I need you guys to think about that before we have the final plat and the final drainage report. If there is some minor infrastructure that needs to be put in, such as that, we need to go ahead and do that at this time. Under streets, I have mentioned the situation with Longview. That is something that I think that you've gotten our recommendation. That is something that the Planning Commission will have to decide. Edwards: There is not any right-of-way existing for it so you are responsible for acquiring that right-of-way. Some discussion has gone on with them in the past and we think that they are minimal for this. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 16 Petrie: I think that if a reasonable agreement can not be reached on that right-of- way, then if the Planning Commission chooses to require the connection the situation might have to come back to the Planning Commission to get them to understand the situation and if somebody is being unreasonable. At that point, they can either take money or something to switch out the condition of approval. Only the Planning Commission can require offsite improvements to the street. That is just our recommendation. Edwards: These are the Council minutes, these are the Planning Commission minutes where it was required when it was appealed to Council. Here is Jack Anderson for the hospital and about how we are going to construct it at a future time. Carpenter: He has obligated us? Edwards: He has. Petrie: That is all that I have. Edwards: Utilities? Jim Sargent — AEP, SWEPCO Sargent: It looks like we have existing facilities on all of the lots except for tract 2. In order to get service to that tract we will need you to put in two conduits from that north property line down to tract 2 where you show that utility easement. Carpenter: Ok, what size? Sargent: We need two 4" conduits. Carpenter: Do you have a schedule 40? Sargent: Yes, a schedule 40 with steel sweeping 90s. Carpenter: What was that again, steel? Sargent: Steel sweeping 90s. The pipe itself will be PVC but the 90s are steel. Carpenter: Ok. Vertical? Sargent: Right, with transition from vertical to horizontal. Carpenter: Are those galvanized? Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 17 Sargent: I am not sure, I think they are. Carpenter: Ok, we'll take care of it. Sargent: Also, you are showing four streetlights along the street, your legend down here says those are existing streetlights. Carpenter: They are. Sargent: Those lights aren't out there. Carpenter: Really? There are streetlights out there. Sargent: There are some lights around the Brookstone. Carpenter: That is my mistake. I went out there and saw the streetlights. Maybe there aren't that many, I don't know. Sargent: There are some lights there in front of Brookstone. Edwards: Those will need to be installed before the final plat. Carpenter: The ones that are not. Conklin: Those must have been shown on the large scale with the road and just didn't get built. Carpenter: That could be. Petrie: The requirement for streetlights is every 300'. Edwards: They are pretty close. If they aren't in we probably need to talk about maybe respacing them so we can get them every 300' because they are about 400 now. Carpenter: Ok, so you want them every 300'? Edwards: Yes. Carpenter: What do you typically do on that? Sargent: We install them and the developer pays for the installation cost and the city pays the road fee cost. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 18 Carpenter: I forgot what kind of light poles are out there. Do you have a standard light that you provide? I don't know if those are special beyond what you normally put in. Sargent: What is in front of Brookstone is a special light that they put in. Edwards: I'm not terribly familiar with it but if you choose to use a special kind we have to get an agreement and we need to talk with Perry, our Traffic Superintendent about that. He has a form for that but it is possible you could do something different. Conklin: You said that they pay for the installation, are they paying for the actual pole and light fixture too? Sargent: Yes. They pay the full cost. Conklin- How much does a street light cost? Sargent: It depends upon how much work we have to do as far as getting a secondary there. Conklin: Not the installation, just the equipment, the fixture and material. Sargent: We add material in the cost of the labor. Conklin: You don't have just the cost of a pole and arm and light? Sargent: They are all different. Conklin: $100? Sargent: If you could get one for that amount it would be an awful good deal. Conklin: Ok. You're not going to throw a number out are you Jim? Sargent: No, I'm not going to throw a number out. Carpenter: People have a way of remembering numbers. Sargent: I wouldn't want to venture a guess. Conklin: Ok. Sargent: That is all that I have. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 19 Johnny Boles — Arkansas Western Gas Boles: Carpenter: Boles: Carpenter: Larry Gibson Gibson: Carpenter: Gibson: Carpenter: Gibson: Carpenter: Gibson: Terry, the easements that you are showing on tract 5, I want to make you aware that on the east side of Wimberly, and I believe it is just off site running north and south, we have two high pressure transmission lines running through there. That is all I have. We went to the gas company. Do you know what size? They are 8" or larger. I knew they were big. — Cox Communications Terry, we already have services to lot 6 of course, for the assisted care and to lot 8. They both have data services. I would also ask you for a conduit in that same location, that southwest where the AEP is coming from that north easement extending to the south to the back of lot 2. If you would, just sweep that up, it can be plastic, it doesn't have to be a rigid. I need a single 4" for Cox. Also, where you sweep those up you will probably want to separate them about 4'. They will have to have room to set a trap for them and everything. Your easements are fine. What are they building? Are they just clearing the tract? On tract two? Yes. Dave Jorgensen right now is working with an architect, Ken Shireman; they are working on a large-scale development. I forgot now what that is. It is a doctors' office. Doctors' offices and medical facilities are really hot on our high-speed data services. We have to make sure we cover every lot on this thing. The easements are fine. We have been told to work close with them but we haven't gotten anything from them yet so we can get anymore specific. Ok, that is all I have. Sue Clouser — Southwestern Bell Clouser: All the easements look fine. If I need you to supply me a conduit there I will get with you because I'm not sure at this time. Technical Plat Review February 13, 2002 Page 20 Carpenter: Clouser: Carpenter: Clouser: Carpenter: Edwards: Nierengarten: Petrie: Edwards: Conklin: Edwards: Conklin: Edwards: Conklin: Nierengarten: Conklin: Why don't we give you one anyway? If you want to throw it in that wouldn't hurt. We would ask for two though. We don't want you to feel left out. I never get left out but I will let you know. Ok. Ok, are there any questions? Is there a fee for the final drainage report as well? It is all a one-time fee of $200. The only other thing I can think of is on tract 8. They did not go through large-scale development because they stated that they were selling that to the county and the county is a higher form of government. They obviously did not sale it, they leased it. When you go through the rezonings, a medical facility is a conditional use in an R -O. I would like to talk to Dawn Warrick who is our Senior Planner who will handle the rezonings and see if she also wants a conditional use for that. It needs a conditional use and it is zoned R -O? Yes. It already has a conditional use. Tract 6 does but tract 8 doesn't. They said that the county owned it and they built it over our Master Street Plan and it didn't come through our process. Now we find out that they don't own it, it is leased by Washington Regional. Technically, they are the county too aren't they? No, they are a not for profit corporation.