HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-09-13 - MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF
TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW
A regular meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee was held on Wednesday, September 13,
2000 at 9:00 a.m. in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain, Fayetteville,
Arkansas.
ITEMS CONSIDERED
LSD 00-29.00 Large Scale Development
(The Mill District LLC, pp 523)
Page 2
STAFF PRESENT
Tim Conklin
Sara Edwards
Ron Petrie
Chuck Rutherford
Kim Rogers
Perry Franklin
ACTION TAKEN
Forward with revisions
STAFF ABSENT
Mickey Jackson
Cheryl Zotti
Kim Hesse
• UTILITIES PRESENT UTILITIES ABSENT
•
Johney Boles, Ar Western Gas
Glen Newman, SWEPCO
Mike Phipps, Ozark Electric
Kevin Lefler, Cox Communications
Bill Smith, Southwestern Bell
•
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 2
LSD 00-29.00: Large Scale Development (The Mill District LLC, pp 523) was submitted by
Chris Brackett of Jorgensen and Associates on behalf of The Mill District LLC for property
located at northwest corner of 6th and School. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare
Commercial and contains approximately 3 29 acres. The request is to build 22,722 square feet of
commercial space and 11 apartments.
Conklin: Good morning. This is a meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee,
September 13, 2000. The only item on the agenda today is a Large Scale
Development for The Mill District submitted by Chris Brackett of Jorgensen and
Associates on behalf of The Mill District LLC for property located at northwest
corner of 6th and School. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial
and contains approximately 3.29 acres. The request is to build 22,722 square feet
of commercial space and 11 apartments. Good morning Chris.
Brackett: Good morning.
Conklin: We will start with Sara Edwards, our Development Coordinator. She will go over
the Planning Division comments and other divisions, then Engineering will go
and then utilities.
Chuck Rutherford - Sidewalk and Trails Coordinator
Rutherford: South School Avenue and 6th Street are principal arterials. This requires a
minimum 6 foot sidewalk continuous through all driveways. The greenspace
along South School shall be a minimum of 10 feet. The existing asphalt strip
adjacent to the curb shall be removed. Old existing driveway entrances that will
not be utilized by this new project shall be removed and closed up with new curb
and gutter.
Perry Franklin - Traffic Superintendent
Franklin: The Nugget building requires an ADA van accessible space and ramp. The Low
Boy Building the same. The Block Building ADA ramp must be in the van
accessible access aisles. Mill Building ADA accessible spaces must have ramps
in the aisles. Where is the Mill Building apartment access located? Is it going to
be in the back or the front?
Sharp: There are going to be two accesses to the apartments. There is going to be one on
the north side and this access right here. They will both come off this elevator.
•
Edwards. So the residents will be parking on this side?
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 3
• •
Sharp: They could park anywhere. They can access here or here or here.
Franklin: So they can access from the front here? The residents can?
Sharp: Yes.
Franklin: Okay. One of these spaces will suffice for that.
Brackett: We will probably move one of those if they need one over there.
Franklin: You can scatter it all out and put one here and one here.
Sharp: Well, we have a grade problem with that. We have an existing loading dock that
connects all the buildings and it hits grade at this point so we would like to put all
our handicap parking here to get everybody on the same grade. Down here it's
quite a bit out of the ground, the existing building.
Conklin: Robert, can you state your name for the record?
Sharp: My name is Rob Sharp.
Franklin: I'll have to get in there and look at that. See we didn't get around that down at the
Richardson Center. We had to build one of these jobs to get them up to there.
Sharp: We might be able to do that. Handicap space here to serve the Mill Building.
Franklin: See here is what I'm talking about. This ramp has to be here. This person can't
unload that wheelchair and get out in this driving surface and get on that ramp.
ADA ramps have to be in the aisle.
Brackett: So we would have to ramp that came around the sidewalk.
Conklin: Is that possible?
Brackett: Yes. We will just omit the curb and let it go straight from here. They are wanting
that to be actually around because of the grade. It could just be a sidewalk.
Anything under 5% is enough to bring it around. We will just show a sidewalk
from the aisle over that will connect into this. That is what we will do. We will
omit the curb there. Just put one here and show it around onto this.
Edwards: Perry, you will get back to them if they have to have one closer to this?
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 4
Franklin: Yes. I'm going to have to look in the ADA about that. I guess the real question
will be, these people that park here, they park in these spaces, how do they get up
to it?
Sharp: They come to here. There is probably some steps to make this transition to get to
this loading dock.
Franklin: Basically, ADA intent is wherever I have to go a guy in a wheelchair can go too.
That's the basic. There is lots of gray areas in there but if we provide access at
one point for me then that wheel chair has to have access at that same point. I
would say we would need to look at the possibility of some kind of access in here
somewhere if it's possible. How is your grade looking here?
Brackett: It's the same kind of deal.
Franklin: Still pretty high?
Brackett: We're close here and the further you go south the worse it gets. I'll have to look
at it.
Franklin: We'll have to get together on that.
Edwards: As far as the dumpster location, we would like for you to move those back to here
maybe, if that's a possibility. Cheryl Zotti said that she does not have any
morning pick up available so she will be picking up in the middle of the day and
they will block traffic. We want you to move it so it won't hinder people coming
in.
Kim Rogers, Parks Operations Coordinator
Rogers: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board voted on July 12, 2000 to accept a
combination of land dedication and money in lieu pending actual purchase of the
Prairie Trail property from the railroad for the City's Trail System subject to the
developer constructing the trail within the Mill District. If the land is not
purchased by the City, a full money in lieu contribution is required. The acreage
discussed for the trail is in the amount of 0.26 acres which would lead to a park
land ordinance money contribution in the amount of $6,375. If land is not
accepted, a money contribution will be required in the amount of $11,250. Please
add the owner and engineer phone numbers to the plat. The trail also needs to be
dedicated to the Sidewalk and Trails Division. This needs to be stated on the plat
before the next meeting.
•
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 5
Edwards: Do you have anything to add about that?
Rogers: No. That says it all.
Sharp: How many apartments is that parks fee based on?
Rogers: I didn't put the number on there because it says land or the money. I think we
said thirty multi units for both phases.
Sharp: We are just doing eleven.
Conklin: They voted to take the land for the trail? They are giving them credit for that
amount of land?
Rogers: If the City decides to buy the rest of the land connecting all the way to Razorback
Road. It said on the City Council agenda to buy that from the railroad
Conklin: Razorback Road?
Rogers: By Swanson's, Vlasic.
Conklin: I don't understand that. North.
Rogers: That's the north part?
Conklin: The City had the opportunity to do that and we didn't require that right-of-way to
Razorback Road. That's gone. So we are talking about north of this project.
Rogers: Okay.
Conklin: I guess Kim, just so the applicant knows what's going on and I know what's
going on, is the City, we are taking the land and giving them the credit based on
the acreage for the number of units?
Rogers. Right.
Conklin: Okay. That's tied to some future action that may or may not happen?
Rogers: That's what I understand.
• Rutherford: What I've been told all the way through is the applicant is going to build this trail.
•
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 6
Conklin:
Brackett:
• •
He dust wants to know how much money he has to pay.
Can we just say that we are going to build the trail instead of having the and/or
because then we construct this trail and then you don't acquire the right-of-way
and then you come back to us for more money after we built it.
Conklin: That doesn't seem right to me.
Rogers: I'm going to have to get back with Connie on that.
Conklin: Yes. If you can just get back with Connie, I think the fair thing to do for this
developer is to either take the land and give him credit for the land that we are
taking for the trail...
Rogers: The reason that we are doing it like because it was like that was if it's not going to
connect to anything we don't want to take just a little bit of a trail that doesn't
connect to anything. That's what the Advisory Board had voted on.
• Conklin: Chuck wants a trail. I want the trail. We want to build a trail. It will be the first
piece of trail in Fayetteville we have. We are debating a policy issue here.
Brackett: We don't have a problem with that.
Conklin: For fairness to them, they need to know. 1 think they don't want to give the City
all this land and build a trail and not get any credit for it.
Rogers: We will give them land credit and the rest, if there is anything else due after that
there will be a money contribution.
Conklin: That's not going to be tied to the future acquisition?
Rogers: From what I understand, it is tied to the future.
Sharp: When we originally talked about this we said we would be willing to do parks
fees or the land dedication and we thought the trail would be put to bed by now.
We've had a couple of snags with getting the land from the railroad company is
what I understand.
Conklin: You own this piece. You can give that piece to the City.
• Sharp: Right. We can give that.
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 7
Conklin: I think everybody wants you to give that to the City.
Rogers: Right they do.
Conklin: I think you should get credit for it.
Rogers: They will get credit for that.
Sharp: Is that also a little piece of land up on Center Street as far as the same right-of-
way? We are also giving part of this in the process.
Rogers: I think the total of .26 acres is including that.
Conklin: We can just find out by Subdivision Committee if we can give them credit.
Rogers: We will give them credit as long as they connect. That's what the Advisory
Board voted on. I can't change that.
• Conklin: I know. I guess the Planning Commission makes the final decision on that by
ordinance. I'll talk to Connie I'm at the point where I want to make a
recommendation that they get credit for the land dedication firstly. I don't know
how we can hold it up on that issue for a long time. We'll see.
•
Sara Edwards - Development Coordinator
Edwards: I do want you to submit some elevations of the Nugget Building.
Sharp: It goes here. It shows the south.
Conklin: Can you, for the record, describe building to building what the materials are going
to be and what the use is going to be within the buildings.
Sharp: I'll start with the Mill Building, it's the most prominent building on the site. It's
an existing building it has corrugated galvanized siding which has seen better
days. The residential area will start here at the third floor and go right on through
the third floor, fourth floor and fifth floor. We will have commercial base in the
existing basement, first floor and second floor. The cladding for the residential
portion is going to be the galvanized corrugated mill siding that was there
originally. The commercial area will be a mixture of galvanized corrugated siding
and a painted cement board which is a stucco like product. We have all the details
spelled out here as canopies which will be painted steel.
•
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 8
Conklin: How many square feet of retail do you have on the basement, first and second
floor?
Brackett: I have it broke down the side here. The Mill Building in the basement is a little
over 3,000, first and second floor.
Conklin: How many residential units?
Brackett: Eleven. There's eighteen bedrooms. There's four one bedrooms and seven two
bedrooms.
Conklin: Is that all the residential we have on the site then? It will be in the middle
building?
Brackett: Yes.
Sharp: The other side of the Mill Building is similar. It's the same idea. The
combination of the cement board with steel siding.
Conklin: When you say painted cement board? What color?
Sharp: White.
Conklin: Okay.
Sharp: These are the cement elevations.
Conklin: Is the structure any higher than what is existing out there?
Sharp. No. We have added on to the existing structure to the north. We've added a stair
tower.
Conklin: Is an elevator required?
Sharp: We are putting in an elevator.
Conklin: Okay.
Sharp: The Low Boy Building, similar situation to the existing building. It's currently
corrugated metal that's been painted yellow and concrete block that's been
painted yellow. We are shortening the building to about 100 feet. We are taking
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 9
off probably 50 feet.
Brackett: It's 46 feet.
Sharp:
Aside from shortening the building, we are basically going to come back in and
just cut a new window opening to keep the materials as they are. The end will be
a corrugated galvanized metal. The concrete block will be painted the chosen
color that we submitted.
Conklin: With regard to what you said, the materials, are you taking that skin off the
corrugated metal?
Sharp: We are going to try to save that.
Conklin: Really what materials exist out there, you will just clean them up?
Sharp: If it's more economical to just strip it off and replace it, we will do that work or if
we can clean it up and make it usable.
Conklin: The use inside of the Low Boy Building is?
Sharp: Commercial space.
Conklin: Retail?
Sharp: I'm not sure whether it's going to be retail or office space. We predict the vast
majority of our commercial space will be office space. Chris added 20% extra on
the parking just in case we have more retail than we expect.
Conklin: That building is one story?
Sharp: It's one story.
Conklin: The mezzanine area will require additional parking.
Sharp: Right.
Conklin: There is a space between the Mill Building and the Low Boy Building.
Sharp. Yes. There is also a building here that lead to that.
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 10
Conklin: Okay. Do they currently connect?
Brackett: Yes.
Conklin: Okay. So you will be taking that out?
Brackett: Yes.
Conklin: Okay.
Sharp: What we call the Block Building you can see in the aerial photo. This building
down in here. What we were talking about, it's an existing concrete block
building. We are talking about taking that building, adding some clear store
windows and adding some parapets to dress that up and get the scale of that
building up to match the other structures.
Conklin: That is this part?
• Sharp: Yes. We are going to paint that building. Green on front and back with black.
trim. We will also be adding canopies to this.
•
Conklin: What's the use of that square footage?
Sharp: All commercial.
Conklin: All commercial retail in that building?
Sharp: Yes.
Conklin: Okay. Then you have the Nugget Building.
Sharp: The Nugget Building we are going to paint the existing brick white and the new
part we are going to add cement board siding that will also be painted white. The
steel will all be painted silver.
Conklin: You are adding onto that building?
Sharp. Yes.
Conklin: The cement board, is that what is being used on Interface Computer?
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 11
Sharp: Yes.
Conklin: Okay. That's painted?
Sharp: Yes.
Conklin: Which is facing south elevations?
Sharp: This is south.
Conklin: The use of that is all office retail?
Sharp. All office.
Conklin: Retail too?
Sharp: It potentially could be retail but it will probably be all office.
Conklin: Okay.
Edwards: I also need elevations of the two monument signs.
Conklin: A couple things I saw, one we do have a fifteen foot landscape requirement. It
looks like you are a little short on this south.
Sharp: Travis Brooks is working on a complete landscape plan for us and he is aware of
that requirement.
Conklin: Okay. Then with your drive, it's not clear cut, the ordinance says the parking lot
typically we include those drives with fifteen foot landscape area I don't see how
you can get that in. I'm in favor of supporting a waiver on that at the Planning
Commission level. For the record, I just wanted to bring that up. Typically, your
drives would have to be fifteen feet. Then you would have landscaping in that
location.
Sharp: It's also the location of our monument sign so we would like to keep that and not
do the screening type landscaping at that location. You can see in this drawing
here the way that wall coming up on Low Boy kind of screens that parking area.
It would be just the drive that would be visible.
• Conklin: Okay.
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 12
Edwards:
Conklin:
Edwards.
Conklin:
Sharp:
Rutherford:
Conklin:
Rutherford:
Conklin:
Rutherford:
Conklin:
Rutherford:
Conklin:
• •
We will need a letter to request a waiver.
I think at least in our report so the Commission knows that. I don't want anybody
to think that drives can be up against the property line on the front.
We need a letter stating the reasons you just said.
That will work. What's your trail going to be made out of?
Chuck, what are you recommending for trail construction?
For the surface?
Yes.
I recommend concrete but I guess it could be asphalt or concrete.
What's the trail going to be if the City does acquire the land and does build it to
the north?
I would say more than likely it would be asphalt but we do have some that have
been built recently that are concrete. The ones by the two new schools are
concrete.
Okay.
I just attended a conference and between asphalt and concrete over a period of
time, concrete was lower maintenance. It can be either or.
Just one other comment then I will let Engineering and utilities go, with regard to
your Commercial Design Standards, we are going to have a discussion about your
metal siding. This is unique though, it's mixed use and you have residential. If it
was all residential we wouldn't be having this discussion. It was a metal building
before and you are going to try to use existing materials. I personally think it's
unique. Our Commercial Design Standards state that metal siding as a main
facade should be avoided or minimized. I guess what I'm telling you right now is
I'm not completely 100% sure you are meeting the standards. I'm not sure if all
the Commissioners are going to be in agreement on that too. I think overall I
support the project. The final decision will be with the Planning Commission on
that. Anything else Sara.
•
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 13
Edwards: I'm not finished. I have a lot more.
Conklin: Your not? You have a lot more? Okay.
Edwards: I need you to add adjacent zoning. I did call you about the legal description.
Brackett: We are working on it.
Edwards: Dimension Prairie from centerline. I did some research and you guys did not get a
variance from the Board of Adjustment yet for the Block and the Nugget
Building.
Sharp: Does the Block Building require a variance?
Conklin: I don't know.
Edwards: Is it because they are not adding on?
• Conklin: Is it zoned 1-1 right here?
Edwards: Yes.
Conklin: What's the side setback?
Edwards: 10.
Conklin: Okay. Like 3 or 4.
Sharp: We have a variance application in for Nugget but not for Block. We will go ahead
and add that today. Submit today.
•
Edwards: Okay. I think the Board of Adjustment is the second of October. We will just go
ahead and process and make everything subject to that approval.
Sharp: Okay.
Edwards: I heard the discussion about the parking spaces. I do understand that you figured
it out as professional office which is going to be 300. You were 20% over like
you said so we will just have to look at it on an individual basis. I don't want us
to get to the point where I say "You have already got this much retail, you don't
have anymore parking spaces." I just want you to be aware of that.
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 14
Sharp: If we end up when we get our final mix and we have to add to the parking space,
can we go ahead and add where we have the extra land or does that require us to
go back through the process?
Conklin: If it's less than twenty-five we can handle it.
Sharp: If we do a lot of parking and it ends up being all professional offices then we are
in over head.
Conklin: We will probably handle it like we are doing with Three Sisters, with the floor
plans. Physically writing down what the use is and how much parking is being
taken up. On that project a lot of it's going offices and it's actually benefitting
their calculations.
Sharp. When we know more. We have the land to provide the extra parking.
Edwards. What is this square?
• Sharp: That is a concrete steel contained basin. You can see on the aerial photo, it's a
good picture of it. That's where I guess they kept all the scary chemicals. What
we are going to do now is Travis Brooks is trying to find some imaginative use
for it to dress it up. For now we will leave it.
•
Conklin: Skateboard park.
Edwards: Are these still in there?
Sharp: They are all gone.
Edwards: I noticed your electric transformer pad, that will have to be screened. I didn't see
where your electric service is, is there utilities on this?
Sharp: It's overhead to that pole.
Conklin: It's over 12 KV.
Sharp. We are double waived.
Conklin: They got a waiver. Well, it's already waived now because the ordinance has
changed. This building that is currently owned by Presley that's on your
property?
•
•
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 15
Sharp:
Conklin:
Sharp:
Conklin:
Sharp:
Conklin:
Edwards:
Petrie:
Brackett:
Petrie:
Conklin:
Brackett.
Conklin:
Sharp:
Conklin:
Sharp:
Yes?
Have you talked to them about that situation at all?
No.
Okay. It doesn't concern you?
I don't think there is much we can do about it now. We went ahead and spaced
our front five feet off of their wall rather than off the property line.
I understand. I had no idea you were wanting to clean that up or whatever the
property line adjustment. Did we talk about that downstairs?
Yes. That's it.
My only comments are to do with easements for the existing water line that runs
through the middle going along the south side of the property you see it going out
of the easement so we will need a little additional easement there. Make that ten
feet for the waterline. It will go up north a little ways to get the ten feet.
Ten feet along the entire thing?
Yes. The other issue is with the sewer in the northwest corner you have a little
pond you are leaving out of that dedication. I don't care if it's dedicated along
with that or what but there needs to be an easement there. We have sewer line.
Can you give that to the City?
I brought that up with Rob that maybe it would be easier to just dedicate that
because you can't really do anything with it.
You really don't want to create a lot that when you dedicate this right-of-way it's
going to create this remnant piece right here.
We should make is part of our parks dedication?
Yes.
It can be a nice trail head feature.
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 16
Conklin: That's what I said. It can be a Chuck Rutherford trail head.
Petrie: There just needs to be an easement if it's not dedicated.
Brackett. That's what we will do.
Petrie. That's all I have.
Rogers: Let me read the motion the Parks Board made. Mr. Walsh will move to accept a
combination of land dedication and money in lieu pending actual purchase of the
Prairie Trail property from the railroad for the City's Trail System subject to the
developer constructing the trail within the Mill District. If the land is not
purchased by the City, a full money in lieu contribution is required. I cannot
change that.
Conklin: I understand.
Rogers: Let me confirm that it was going to be 30 multi units?
Brackett: Right, we changed it.
Rogers. Now that it is 11 and if these other conditions are met there will be no money in
lieu contribution to make. The .26 will satisfy park land ordinance dedication as
per units.
Brackett: That won't change whether you buy the property or not?
Rogers: Yes it will.
Conklin: The motion is the City has to buy the property which we are in the process of that.
Have we heard back from the railroad?
Rutherford: Yes. It's going to be brought up at the Trail Committee meeting tonight;
Conklin: Today? Okay.
Rutherford: They made a comment on where they want to go from here with that.
Conklin: Is it positive?
• Rutherford: Oh yes, it's positive. It's just how they want to go about it. Two issues.
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 17
Brackett:
Rutherford:
Brackett:
Conklin:
Brackett:
Conklin:
Rutherford:
Sharp:
Conklin:
Brackett:
• •
It looks like it's going to happen we just don't know when.
My assumption would be that it is going to happen. They just have to figure out
what they are comfortable with. The problem is, the appraisal went down. The
appraisal came in at $50,000. The property management company that's handling
this for the railroad said "It can not be bought for less than $70,000."
Do we have the option of removing the trail and just giving the money?
No.
I guess it doesn't really matter then.
I think the trail is going to be purchased.
I think this trail adds some real positives for the City. Say it is going to be built.
It has to start somewhere.
We are going to get a trail built. It will be our longest multi use trail to date right
here.
That's fine. We don't have a problem with building it. I just wanted to see what
our options were.
Conklin: Chris, you are probably aware of the Master Street Plan issue and promises that
were made and all that good stuff. I think at this point we need to build a trail and
get the right-of-way.
Brackett: Okay. That's fine.
Conklin: Perry? Need a traffic signal or anything?
Franklin: The City does have a project at 6`" and College. We are realigning the east side of
the intersection to curb lines with the west side.
Sharp: We are anxious to see that happen.
Conklin: Utilities?
Glen Newman - SWEPCO
•
•
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 18
Newman: We have 12 KV facilities on the north, east and south sides. I know it says that
this electric transformer pad is existing on there. That transformer has been
removed and all the underground cable is out. 1 guess we are virtually starting
from scratch. Tell us where and we will try to work out the logistics.
Sharp: We are still trying to size that service.
Johney Boles - Arkansas Western Gas
Boles:
Chris, from the edge of the right-of-way up to this building setback showing
twenty-four feet width, if you would, I would like you to dedicate twenty feet of
this utility easement on the north side of Highway 62 over to the Nugget Building.
Go around the Nugget Building.
Brackett: Go up and around like this?
Boles: No. Just bring it over this point and pick it up and continue.over here.
Brackett: You are going up in here and keep it up?
Boles: Yes. Twenty foot. Over to the edge of the proposed expansion and then pick it
up here and carry it out.
Conklin: Twenty foot that wraps around the building?
Boles: Well no. It stops.
Brackett: It stops at the building and then continues.
Boles: If need be at that point we could go out on the highway and petition the Highway
Department for a permit to around that for future use. Also on the west side of
South School Avenue, twenty feet outside the right-of-way.
Brackett: On the west side.
Boles: On the west side of school.
Brackett: Twenty foot, the length?
Boles: Yes, please.
•
•
•
• •
Plat Review Minutes
September 13, 2000
Page 19
Sharp: You are going to get those trees.
Boles: We are not planning anything at this time but we need to secure that easement for
future use and if the need arise where we had to use this, we could use a
directional boring machine and would go under all those trees, not causing the
trees any damage. It shouldn't be a problem. Can you give me a worse case
scenario as far as tenant spaces on this Mill Building? First of all, are you going
to want natural gas for this project.
Sharp:
We are still in the process of working that out. The apartments will probably be
electric but the commercial space might have some gas. We will coordinate that
with you as soon as possible.
Boles: Okay. The situation may arise that we are going to need some additional
easements from our existing facilities over to the building.
Brackett. 1 guess that depends on what they decide to do with the building.
Boles:
Right. It will. So I can give you until a later date to make sure you get that taken
care of. I need to double check about this existing gas line you are showing on the
north side of 62. I need to double check my records because I'm not sure that that
line is there. I will let you know on that. Maybe it's just not reflected on our
records so I will double check that. That's all I have.
Cox Communications
Edwards: Cox Communications sent their comments in. He wants a 4" conduit to be placed
by the development from the mechanical area to the nearest electric company
pole. Either along South School or 6th Street. Any crossing locator placed across
the facilities underground would be at the owner's expense. The Landscape
Administrator did not have a chance to get her comments so she wants you to call
this afternoon.
Conklin: She is aware of that rare tree you have on your site that you are taking out. That
28" hackberry and that it's diseased apparently in the middle. She is in favor of
taking that large tree out. That's it. Thank you everybody.