Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-01-13 - Minutes• MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE A regular meeting of the Subdivision Committee was held on Thursday, January 13, 2000 at 8:30 a.m. in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas. ITEMS CONSIDERED FP99-9: Woodlands, pp168 LSD99-27: Northpark Place II, pp212 LSD99-17: Spring Creek Centre, pp174 MEMBERS PRESENT Lorel Hoffman Conrad Odom Lee Ward STAFF PRESENT Tim Conklin Sara Edwards Kim Hesse Janet Johns Ron Petrie Chuck Rutherford Dawn Warrick ACTION TAKEN Approved Forward Changes approved MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF ABSENT • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 2 FP99-9: FINAL PLAT WOODLANDS, PP168 This item was submitted by Dave Jorgensen of Jorgensen and Associates on behalf of Tom Terminella for property owned by Henry Shreve located at the northwest corner of Howard Nickell Road and Hwy 112. The property is within the Fayetteville planning area and contains approximately 72.09 acres with 10 lots proposed. Dave Jorgensen was present on behalf of the request. Staff Recommendation Staff recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of right of way along Arkansas Highway No. 112 must be done by warranty deed prior to filing the final plat documents. 2. Fire protection by the city will not be available for these lots. 3. Subject to all Plat Review and Subdivision comments. 4. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications, and calculations for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets, sidewalks, parking lots and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval All improvements shall comply with the City's current requirements. Commission Discussion Conklin: This is a final plat for the Woodlands. You saw this last month. There were no streets that were required to be built. The Lots are all large and they intend to develop them as single family homes. Public Comment None. MOTION Conunissioner Odom made a motion to approve the final plat subject to staff conditions. • • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 3 Comrnissioner Ward seconded the motion. Commissioner Hoffman concurred. • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 4 LSD99-27: LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT NORTHPARK PLACE PHASE II, PP212 This item was submitted by Geoffrey Bates of Crafton, Tull & Associates on behalf of Danny Smith for property located at 3380 Wimberly Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 1.9 acres. The request is for a 19,700 square foot clinic, pharmacy, and sales building with 130 parking spaces. A conditional use is being requested for excess parking spaces. Geoffrey Bates was present on behalf of the request. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends forwarding this large scale to the full Planning Commission subject to the following conditions: 1. Planning Commission must determine the following requests: a. Compliance with Commercial Design Standards b. The development is required to have 79 parking spaces. With an additional 20% allowance the maximum number of spaces allowed is 91. The applicant is proposing 39 additional spaces bring the total request to 130 parking spaces. They are requesting the Planning Commission to grant a conditional use for 130 parking spaces. c. A property line adjustment is being sought in order to add additional property for parking An application has been submitted but has not been finalized. Approval of this large scale development shall be contingent upon the approval of the requested property line adjustment. d. A request is being made for a variance of the 15 foot required landscape strip along Millsap and Wimberly Drive. They are requesting to reduce the provision to a 7 foot landscaping strip. Kim Hesse, Landscape Administrator supports this request under the condition that berms or large plants are utilized in these areas. e. The Master Street Plan indicates Wimberly Drive as a collector street which requires 35 feet of right of way The applicant is requesting a waiver of the 35 feet and proposing that only 25 feet be required. The request will need to be decided by City Council. 2. Signs need to be indicated on the plans. • 3. A ramp and access aisles or spaces with direct access to the building are needed in order to comply with ADA regulations. • • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 5 4. Approval is subject to all Plat Review and Subdivision comments. 5. Staff must approve final detailed plans, specifications and calculations for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets, sidewalks, parking lots and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval All improvements shall comply with the City's current requirements. 6. Sidewalks must be constructed in accordance with current standards to include a 6 foot sidewalk with a minimum 10 foot green space along Millsap Drive. 7. Large Scale Development approval is valid for one calendar year. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits b. Separate easement plat c. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City as required by § 158.01 to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 9. All new utilities are required to be underground. 10. If the dumpster is visible from the public right of way, it will need to be screened. Commission Discussion Hoffman: I believe this is for the Northwest Arkansas Pediatric Clinic. Conklin: This is a request for large scale development. We have a letter regarding the request for additional parking which is based on the Northwest Arkansas Pediatric Clinic going into this facility. The applicant has requested 130 parking spaces. 39 of the parking spaces will have to be approved by conditional use and that is a separate action which will be brought forward to the Planning Commission meeting. They have submitted the application for a lot line adjustment along the south to provide for additional parking. A landscape variance is being requested. A waiver is requested on dedication of right of way. Wimberly was classified as a collector street on February 16, 1999. That is a change. Originally is was to the north and when Washington County built their health facility in that location, we reclassified Wimberly Drive to • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 6 Futrall and Monte Painter as a collector street. This property was exempted from the Design Overlay District in 1997. At that time, you saw this project in a different configuration and with a larger building. That project was denied. The concern at that time was inadequate parking for a proposed retail facility. Also, underground utilities were an issue This proposal is significantly less than the previous proposal. Commercial Design Standards apply. The building elevations are available for review. Cross access is proposed from this development to the development south on Millsap. This committee needs to address compliance with Commercial Design Standards and parking issues which will need to be addressed with the full Commission as a part of the conditional use request. A property line adjustment is requested in order to have more land to accommodate additional parking. Approval of this Large scale development will be contingent upon approval of the property line adjustment. The 15 foot landscape buffer along Millsap and Wimberly is addressed as a variance. They are requesting to reduce that to a 7 foot landscaping strip. Kim Hesse has supported this request under the condition that larger plants and berms be utilized in this area. Issues with the Master Street Plan and the request to dedicate less than the standard will have to go forward to the City Council. Wimberly Drive is currently 31 feet from back of curb to back of curb. A collector street is 36 feet. We are not recommending that the developer do any of the improvements. It would be 2.5 feet of widening on Wimberly Drive to meet the collector street standard. Normally, the City would pay for that and it is not in the Capital Improvements Program. If at some point, we funded widening of Wimberly Drive, we would be able to do so by cutting into the green space area between the sidewalk and curb. The collector street standard in our Master Street Plan allows parking on both sides of the street. The existing 31 feet could function as a collector street. Signs will need to be address and they need to present those today. Staff did not review those at our In House Plat Review meeting. Rutherford: They've made the correction I asked I for. Hoffman: Would the right of way dedication affect what you've done? Rutherford: No. Petrie: I don't have comments at this time. Hoffman: Have you had an opportunity to review the drainage plan? Petrie: They are acceptable as preliminary. We will expect final numbers before improvements are made. Hesse: They are short on trees in the islands. Maybe 1 or 2. • Bates: At Plat Review, I thought we discussed lining the back property line with trees • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 7 Hesse: I haven't walked this. You almost have a hardship. We've looked at adding trees in other places to meet the interior landscaping before. Regarding the waiver, I'm not sure they need it because they really aren't that short. I would support this plan. I would like to see the finalized landscape plan with larger shade trees: Hoffman: I would like to address the parking waiver first. Is this request unusual or is it in line with the use? Why do we have so many parking waiver requests for more parking? Conklin: Typically, the parking waiver requests are for restaurants. Our ordinance does not allow enough parking for restaurants. Hoffman: What about banks? Conklin: I think we've addressed and amended the parking issues for banks. It's restaurants that are the problem. I think by allowing the 20% over it is working and I wouldn't propose any changes to restaurants or banks at this time. Hoffman: So this is a professional office use? Conklin: To clarify, is this entirely for the pediatric clinic? Bates: Danny Smith and Don Mobley are here. I think there is retail proposed as well. Mobley: There's almost 5,000 square feet of retail. Hoffman: So 5,000 square feet are for a separate use. Mobley: Somewhere between 4,600 to 4,800 square feet will be a lease space which is intended to be retail. Hoffman: How does that effect our ratios? Conklin: I think the retail has been calculated into parking. Bates: The plan shows 4,700 square feet at the retail ratio of 1 space per every 200 square feet and the rest is doctor's office at 1 space per every 300. That is how we came up with 91 spaces. We went back and looked at North Hills and the whole area was 1 space per 200 square feet according to the plat. The parking across the street is all 1 per 200 ratio. Hoffman: Has the applicant had an opportunity to do an actual study of your patient flow? • • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 8 Mobley: Yes, we have. There is a letter on file that addresses that. The pediatric business is based on the number of exam rooms and number of employees in the clinic and the number of people in the waiting room. That is addressed in the letter. I think the total is 125. Bates: They have about 50 employees. Ward: The letter has 43 non -physician employee parking spaces. Conklin: They have 2 other facilities. One is in Colt Square and the Sick Child on Joyce and I'm not sure what parking they have for those 2 facilities. Hoffman: So, is this going to be a combination of.those 2 facilities? Will everybody be in one spot? Bates: Yes. Mobley: They have a sick waiting room and a well waiting room. Hoffman: For those 2 facilities, could you give me an approximation of what parking is in place now andwhat you are proposing for the new facility? Bates: How many employees do you have now when you combine both? Tate: We have 43 non -physician employees, 11 physicians, and 4 nurse practitioners and psychologists. Hoffman: So, that's a total of 60 people? When I go to the doctor, there are 10 people in the waiting room and they're all signed up for the same doctor at the same time. Tate: We have 29 exam rooms on the sick side and 9 exam rooms on the well side and we will have 10 physicians working at that facility at the same time. Hoffman: So, if you have 50 patients and 60 employees, we have 110 parking spaces needed. Conklin: You would look at the additional 46 for the 4,800 square feet of sales at 1 space per 200 square feet. Bates: That's 21, I believe. Conklin: They're requesting 130 spaces. • • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 9 Hoffman: I would like for you to revise your letter for the Planning Commission. Detail the number of employees on site; the number of exam rooms; and, patient load. Conklin: The letter from the Pediatric Clinic states there will be 45 exam rooms. Would you like an accounting of what their existing facilities have as far as exam rooms and doctors? Hoffman: Good idea. I am reluctant to add parking when it's not necessary but if you can prove that it's needed, then we will look at it. We need to also look at it in terms of what's being done in terms of landscaping and the street issue. Those 3 issues are interconnected. Proving that you need the parking is important. Conldin: I agree. I know Wischmeyer Architects specialize in medical office design. If you have other data or information from around the country on other projects that you have done, that would be helpful for staff and the Commission. Odom. The 20% overage would allow up to 110 spaces. Is that right? 91 are required but don't they get 20% overage? Conklin: The 91 is with the 20% overage. Hoffman: We have routinely been doing other medical facilities. Have we had this request for other projects? Conklin: I don't remember. Warrick: You have granted additional parking for a project which will be constructed on Millsap Road. That's Millsap Medical Center. Hoffman: Is that under construction now? Warrick: Yes. Hoffman: Let's take a look at it. How much bigger was that building? Conklin: It was 28,000 square feet and it is 2 story. Hoffman: It was a multi tenant building. Tate: In pediatrics, it is not uncommon that we have the babysitter who brings the patient in and then the grandparents or parents or both meet at the clinic. That could be 3 spaces taken up for 1 patient. • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 10 Hoffman: That's a true statement. However, we want to encourage everyone going in 1 car. I would like specifics from other areas ready by Agenda Session.. Conklin: This is a separate conditional use request. We will post a separate sign and do a separate report with a separate recommendation on that. Hoffman: I would like our traffic engineer to make a report, please. I would like his opinion on the parking lot configuration in terms of the number of extra parking spaces and a report on the decreased right of way width. Conklin: We talked to the City Engineer about the right of way width and he agreed that the 36 feet wasn't necessary in this location. We're not giving up anything, we're just requesting them to make a dedication. Hoffman: I don't like the idea of not getting everything we could. Conklin: One of the reasons why staff has supported this request is that this lot is pie shaped and there are Master Street Plan streets on 2 sides. The Master Street Plan was revised less than a year ago on this street. This was exempted from the Overlay District. This lot was platted prior to these current ordinances and it is very difficult to try and get everything on this lot that they want to do. Staff looked at the street and how it is functioning and could it function as a 31 foot collector street. That is why we supported it. Bates: Was the Master Street Plan revised before or after North Hills Boulevard was moved to the east? Conklin: I'm not sure on the timing of that. The MSP was revised on February 16, 1999. Hoffman: I think that would be helpful. I don't want to leave too much Committee work for Planning Commission. Petrie: I need to clarify what you want the traffic engineer to look at. Hoffman: I would like to know the number of parking spaces, vehicle counts per day, and trips per day, based on this use. Can we talk about cross access? I'm referring to the existing asphalt parking and concrete drive noted at the corner of the plan. Is that 24 foot area cross access? What is the tree there? Mobley: Those are existing trees through there which will have to be removed or relocated. • Hoffman: Okay. • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 11 Mobley: That's cross access and additional parking behind the existing buildings. We're moving the dumpster from the street to behind the building. Hoffman: Will there be parking on another site? Is that what is shown? Conklin: That is an existing developed office building to the east. They are proposing to add cross access and relocate that dumpster to the south which is behind the building. Hoffman: Will the asphalt parking and railroad tie trim be relocated? Mobley: It will not be affected in any way. We're going around it. It's not tied into this project at all. Hoffman: Okay, but your property line goes right through the middle of it. Mobley: Yes, it does. Hoffman: If it's parking for that office building, what's going to happen? Mobley: He owns both properties. Conklin: For clarification, all that will remain back there. You are not proposing to remove any of that. Smith: No. Conklin: What is that parking for? Smith: It's for the building there. Conklin: And it was built because there wasn't room up front? Smith: Right. Hoffman: The question I have is if one of the other properties was sold, would you execute a parking easement or something with yourself? Conklin: This parking wasn't required by the city. He could do a property line adjustment to adjust around it and keep it with the office property. It would be easy to do. • Smith: Property line adjustment. • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 12 Hoffman: I'm just trying to avoid a problem. Ward: Is there a power line going through there? Conklin: That is overhead electric and it is over the threshold of the ordinance. Mobley: It's on the next page of your plans. Hoffman: Is there any need for another access on the south end of the property? Conklin: We looked at that and I wanted to bring that up today. It was not discussed at In - House Review. I would not be a bad idea to have cross access on that southeast corner for future development. Mobley: Going which way? Conklin: Going to the east. • Hoffman: I'm not sure I support the waiver for the right of way. Conklin: You would need 36 feet if there was a center turn lane. A turn lane isn't necessary. Also, a 36 foot street would allow for parking on both sides. In the North Hills Medical Park, they are providing parking on site. • Public Comment None. Further Commission Discussion Mobley: Would you like to see the signs? Conklin: We need to discuss the elevations. I'd like the architect to go over the building materials and have him explain how the architectural elements of this building tie into the overall development. Mobley: What we attempted to do was match the North Hills Medical Park brick and banding of the brick as seen on the elevations. We have been before the North Hills Architectural Review Committee, to discuss the roof and they gave us their permission to use composition shingles as opposed to the metal. • • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 13 Hoffman: In what color? Mobley: Well, that's to be decided. We have shown a light green but we have not selected anything. It will depend on if we can get the brick to match and that will dictate what will be selected. The gables that you see will be EFTS or Drivet which is the trade name. We anticipate signage for the clinic in the gable area and freestanding signs to be determined. Hoffman: We have the north and west elevations. What about east and south? Mobley: You will only see one wall looking directly on. We will get those on the construction document. What you see on the roof is a center core and that will be a flat area of roof where we will set the heating and air conditioning units. That's hard to show on a drawing. Hoffman: So there is a raised effect around the equipment. Mobley: Yes. There is a pitched roof with a recessed area. Hoffman: I was worried about a long blank wall along the back. Conklin: When you went to. the Architectural Review Committee, did they review the plans or address the issue of exemption from the Overlay District? Alett Little granted the exemption and she required compliance with the North Hills Medical Park covenants. In those covenants, it talks about a 15 foot landscape area from the property line. Did they grant you approval for less than 15 feet that you are proposing today? Mobley: I don't think we addressed that at this time. It was granted previously. Conklin: I would like for you to go back and have them make a decision on that issue and give us a letter of determination. I want to make sure you are complying and have the proper exemptions. There was a variance granted for that requirement in 1997 but I would like for them to look at this one and get us a letter. Hoffman: Can you have that for us by the Agenda Session on January 20? Mobley: I would say that we can. Yes, we can do that. Hoffman: Are you proposing freestanding signs? Mobley: I think that we will. Danny and I discussed that yesterday. I think we will want one at the intersection of Wimberly and Futrall. We're thinking about a monument sign 5 feet in height and 10 feet in length. Something like that. • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 14 Hoffman: Is that in the sight line from the corner? Conklin: I will have to take a look at that. Mobley: We'll locate it so that it will be a safe distance. Hoffman: So, you are proposing just one, monument sign. Conklin: We'll need an elevation with the dimensions on that. Mobley: Do we need that for the resubmittal? Conklin: Yes. City Planning will only sign off on signs which are approved by the Planning Commission. So, if you come back with additional signs, you'll have to go back to Planning Commission and get those approved. Mobley: What about signage on the building? • Conklin: I don't know if you are proposing a sign in the circular vent area in the EFTS. Mobley: We intend to do something across the bottom of the gable. Conklin: Okay. Mobley: We can show that on the elevation if we need to. • Conklin: You need to show it. I know what you want to do now. It will be a rectangle and it will be located at the bottom. I have no problem with that proposal. Hoffman: I guess if the review committee approves the roof, we will need a letter on that. Are there any other buildings in that area that don't have the green metal? Mobley: The County Health Department has a composition roof. Hesse: On the preservation of the maples on Wimberly, I would like some flexibility. We're pretty much at grade and it may get crowded and they could get confused and damage the root system. I would like to do inspections and if needed require replacement with medium trees at a later time. When the City replaced the sidewalk along North Hills I was amazed at how shallow the roots were. I want to look at that during construction and have the authority to require replacement if necessary. • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 15 Hoffman: Let's get memorialized on the plat with a note. Conklin: The lines that we see in the brick, what are those? Mobley: They are a darker color brick. I believe North Hills is slightly recessed. It is a darker color, banded brick. Conklin: When you pull the permit for this, we'll have the same number and type of lines going across the front. Mobley: Yes. Ward: I think it's real important that you do some research on other pediatric clinics around the area or nation on the parking issue. I understand that compared to other medical clinics pediatrics need a lot more parking. You need to prove that to a committee of 9 people. MOTION Commissioner Ward made a motion to forward LSD99-27 to the full Planning Commission subject to all the conditions and resolution of all waiver requests. Commissioner Odom seconded the motion. Hoffman: On the resubmittal, you need to have your sign elevations, landscaping note, cross access, and finalization of your lot line adjustment. Staff needs to provide the engineer's traffic report for the parking lot and right of way Also, you need to update your letter regarding the need for parking spaces. Edwards. We will also look for a letter from the Architectural Review Committee approving the building elevations and the 15 foot green space requirement. • Subdivision Conunittee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 16 LSD99-17: LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT SPRING CREEK CENTRE, PP174 This item was submitted by Roger Trotter of Development Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Developers diversified for property located in lots 3A and 4R of Spring Park Subdivision. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial, and contains approximately 5.488 acres. Bradley McLaurin was present on behalf of this item. Committee Discussion Conklin: Old Navy has revised their elevation and I wanted to submit them to you today to see if you are comfortable approving the changes at this level. You have approved this. Bed Bath & Beyond has been constructed and is open. Hoffman: I have a procedural question, if this wasn't advertised, can we do this? Can we have this meeting? Conklin: I was asked if we can approve this administratively I'm trying to figure out how much of a change triggers what you would want to see again. If this is a substantial change it may need to go to the entire Commission or you can approve this at this level. Once Bed Bath & Beyond was constructed, Old Navy wanted a larger front on their building. They are change the front of the building and changed the colors incorporating more gray. McLaurin: The original one is white. All their buildings are white. There is nothing white in this development. There is a light, gray Drivet across the street. Conklin: I administratively approved the continuation of the band along this side. I thought it looked better. Hoffman: Is the landscaping still in place? Conklin: Everything is the same. All they're asking is if they can take the front and expand it out and use the gray color. Odom: The red portion will remain? McLaurin: That is a separate retail space for a separate tenant but it will remain the red Drivet. Ward: I don't see much difference. • • Subdivision Committee Minutes January 13, 2000 Page 17 Odom: I don't think it's substantial enough to send it back to the full Commission. Is this going to be back lit? McLaurin: Yes. Their stores are typically back lit. Conklin: This is all glass. McLaurin: It's not very bright but it is back lit. Hoffman: Does the whole area count as the sign and does it meet the sign ordinance? If it's back lit, I would tend to view it as a sign. Conklin: Hastings in Fiesta Square back lit their entire canopy. McLaurin: The lights inside of there are shining on the back wall of the store and not on the glass. It's a reflected light and not direct. Conklin: Under our sign ordinance, we do not regulate things that are placed on the inside of the windows. McLaurin: The lights are inside the store. Odom: I'm okay with it. It's essentially the same thing. McLaurin: There is a sign on the side which is not reflected on those drawings. It's on the west side of the store. That sign is back lit with fluorescent. Hoffman: That's fine. I don't have a problem with that. I'm concerned about light pollution and what we do about the sign interpretation issue. Conklin: It's 150 square feet or 20% which ever is greater. They will meet that. Odom: If it wasn't articulated it would be a problem. Hoffman: Okay. Ward: Okay. Odom: Okay. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m. • Subdivision Committee Table of Contents 2000 Item Considered: FP99-9 Woodlands, pp 168 LSD99-27 Northpark Place II, pp 212 LSD99-17 Spring Creek Centre, pp 174 FP99-8 Covington Park II, pp 295 LSD99-22 Butterfield Trial Village, pp 175 LSD00-1 Interface Computer Center, pp 286 LS00-1 Candlewood Development, pp 294 FP00-1 Barrington Parke, Ph II, pp 373 LSD00-3 City of Fayetteville Airport, pp 795 LS00-2 Walker, pp 256 PP00-1 Yorktowne, Ph III, pp 214 LSD00-4 CMIS, pp 214 LSD00-5 Steele Crossing, pp 212 LS00-7 Yogi & Boo Boo, pp 175 • P00-2 Quail Creek Ph III, pp 250 S00-6 Wedington Place, Lot 3R, pp 401 LSD00-7 Indian Springs, Ph II, pp 372 LS00-9 Ayecock, pp 368 LSD00-8 McDonald's, pp 401 LSD00-2.10 Atlas Construction, pp 367 AD00-11 Nelms, pp 248 Discussion of Drive -In theater on Hwy 112 LS00-11 & 15 Hahn, pp 651 LS00-12 Southerland, pp 520 LS00-13 Nelson, pp 173 LS00-14 Hooker Construction, pp 209 LSD00-9 Hooker Construction, pp 209 LSD00-9 Hooker Construction, pp 209 LSD00-10 City of Fayetteville Water & Sewer Operations Center, pp 638 LSD00-11 Ozark Electric Cooperative Corp, pp AD00-17 Garroutte, pp 137 LSD00-7.10 PUD Indian Springs, Ph II, pp 372 LS00-17 Gladden, pp 167 LS00-18 Anders/Bryan pp 141 .S00-19 Baggett, pp 529 Date: 1/13/00 1/13/00 1/13/00 2/3/00 2/3/00 2/17/00 2/17/00 3/16/00 3/16/00 3/16/00 3/16/00 3/16/00 3/16/00 3/30/00 3/30/00 3/30/00 4/13/00 4/13/00 4/13/00 4/27/00 4/27/00 4/27/00 5/11/00 5/11/00 5/11/00 5/11/00 5/11/00 6/1/00 6/1/00 4406/1/00 6/1/00 6/1/00 6/15/00 6/15/00 6/15/00 Action Taken: Approved Forward Changes Approved Approved Forwarded to Planning Commission Forwarded with Revisions Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Forwarded to Planning Commission Forwarded to Planning Commission Approved Forwarded to Planning Commission Approved Forwarded to Planning Commission Approved Forwarded to Planning Commission Forwarded to Planning Commission Approved Approved to submit LSD Approved Approved Approved Tabled Tabled Forwarded Approved Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Approved Item Considered: SDO�Hampton Parking, pp 245 LSD00-13 State Fair Cinema, pp 209 AD00-21 Fayetteville City Schools, pp 372 LSD00-14 Trinity Temple, 252 LS00-16 Gale, pp 60 LS00-22 Martin, pp 609 LS00-20 & 24 Eckles, pp 168 FP00-2 Millennium Place, pp 177 LSD00-16 Keating Enterprises, Inc. pp 289 LSD00-15 Lake Hills Church, pp 255 LSD00-17 McDonald's, pp 134 LS00-24 Middlebrook, pp 140 LS00-25 Krueger, pp 255 LSD00-19 Bradley, pp 177 LSD00-20 Cornerstone, pp 402 LSD00-22 St. Joseph Catholic Church, pp 373 LSD00-15 Lake Hill's Church, pp 55 AD00-29 Arkansas National Bank, pp 401 AD00-30 WRMC, pp 212 LSD00-25 Air BP, pp 795 •SD00-20 Bradley, pp 177 LSD00-22 St. Joseph Catholic Church, pp 373 AD00-30 WRMC, pp 212 LSD00-18.10 L&E Equity Investments, LLC, pp, 177 LSD00-24 Stephens, pp 212 LS00-26 Schmitt, pp 298 FP00-3 Summersby, pp 410 LS00-30 Palmer, pp 572 LS00-29 & 33 Pursley, pp 140 LSD00-27 Emad Damen Duplex Units, pp 364 AD00-34 Frazer, pp 520 LSD00-29 The Mill District LLC, pp 523 LS00-30 Palmer, pp 572 AD00-35 Trinity Temple, pp 252 LS00-36 Tipton, pp 475 LSD00-31 Dixie Development, pp 176 FP00-4 Covington Park Phase IV, pp 265 LS00-38 Wilkins, pp 221 LS00-39 Wilkins, pp 221 -SD00-31 Dixie Development, pp 176 Date: 6/15/00 6/15/00 6/15/00 6/29/00 6/29/00 6/29/00 6/29/00 6/29/00 6/29/00 7/13/00 7/13/00 8/3/00 8/3/00 8/3/00 8/3/00 8/3/00 8/3/00 8/17/00 8/17/00 8/17/00 8/17/00 8/31/00 8/31/00 8/31/00 8/31/00 8/31/00 9/14/00 9/14/00 9/14/00 9/14/00 9/28/00 9/28/00 9/28/00 9/28/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 11/2/00 11/2/00 11/12/00 Action Taken: Approved Approved Approved Forwarded Approved Forwarded Approved Approved Forwarded Tabled Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Tabled Forwarded Approved Approved Approved Forwarded Forwarded Approved Approved Approved Approved Forwarded Tabled Approved Forwarded Approved Forwarded Approved Approved Approved Tabled Approved Tabled Tabled Forwarded item Considered: AD00-41 Nantucket Apt., pp 563 LSD99-6 Millsap Center, pp 212 LS00-27 Schmitt, pp 298 LSD00-30 St. Paul's Episcopal Church, pp 484 LSD00-33 Lots 13-16 Millennium Place AD00-42 Tri-State Precast, pp 756 AD Glennwood (sign) AD LSD00-20 LSD00-32 Park Apt., pp 175 LS00-41 Lot 5, Wedington Place, pp 401 LS00-42 Fazoli's, pp 213 LSD00-34 Fazoli's, pp 213 LSD00-35 Hooker, pp 209 LSD99-21 Bank of Fayetteville LSD98-15.10 Kantz Place LSD00-27 Emad Damen Duplex Units, pp 364 AD00-42 McCollum Avenue/Willoughby Road • • Date: 11/12/00 11/12/00 11/12/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 12/28/00 12/28/00 Action Taken - Approved with Conditions Approved Approved with Conditions Forwarded Forwarded Tabled Approved Approved Forwarded Approved Approved Forwarded Forwarded Approved Approved Approved Approved