HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-01-13 - Minutes• MINUTES OF A MEETING OF
THE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
A regular meeting of the Subdivision Committee was held on Thursday, January 13, 2000 at 8:30
a.m. in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
ITEMS CONSIDERED
FP99-9: Woodlands, pp168
LSD99-27: Northpark Place II, pp212
LSD99-17: Spring Creek Centre, pp174
MEMBERS PRESENT
Lorel Hoffman
Conrad Odom
Lee Ward
STAFF PRESENT
Tim Conklin
Sara Edwards
Kim Hesse
Janet Johns
Ron Petrie
Chuck Rutherford
Dawn Warrick
ACTION TAKEN
Approved
Forward
Changes approved
MEMBERS ABSENT
STAFF ABSENT
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 2
FP99-9: FINAL PLAT
WOODLANDS, PP168
This item was submitted by Dave Jorgensen of Jorgensen and Associates on behalf of Tom
Terminella for property owned by Henry Shreve located at the northwest corner of Howard
Nickell Road and Hwy 112. The property is within the Fayetteville planning area and contains
approximately 72.09 acres with 10 lots proposed.
Dave Jorgensen was present on behalf of the request.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommended approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Dedication of right of way along Arkansas Highway No. 112 must be done by warranty
deed prior to filing the final plat documents.
2. Fire protection by the city will not be available for these lots.
3. Subject to all Plat Review and Subdivision comments.
4. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications, and calculations for grading,
drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets, sidewalks, parking lots and tree
preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for
general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and
approval All improvements shall comply with the City's current requirements.
Commission Discussion
Conklin: This is a final plat for the Woodlands. You saw this last month. There were no
streets that were required to be built. The Lots are all large and they intend to develop them as
single family homes.
Public Comment
None.
MOTION
Conunissioner Odom made a motion to approve the final plat subject to staff conditions.
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 3
Comrnissioner Ward seconded the motion.
Commissioner Hoffman concurred.
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 4
LSD99-27: LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT
NORTHPARK PLACE PHASE II, PP212
This item was submitted by Geoffrey Bates of Crafton, Tull & Associates on behalf of Danny
Smith for property located at 3380 Wimberly Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare
Commercial and contains approximately 1.9 acres. The request is for a 19,700 square foot clinic,
pharmacy, and sales building with 130 parking spaces. A conditional use is being requested for
excess parking spaces.
Geoffrey Bates was present on behalf of the request.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends forwarding this large scale to the full Planning Commission subject to the
following conditions:
1. Planning Commission must determine the following requests:
a. Compliance with Commercial Design Standards
b. The development is required to have 79 parking spaces. With an additional 20%
allowance the maximum number of spaces allowed is 91. The applicant is
proposing 39 additional spaces bring the total request to 130 parking spaces.
They are requesting the Planning Commission to grant a conditional use for 130
parking spaces.
c. A property line adjustment is being sought in order to add additional property for
parking An application has been submitted but has not been finalized. Approval
of this large scale development shall be contingent upon the approval of the
requested property line adjustment.
d. A request is being made for a variance of the 15 foot required landscape strip
along Millsap and Wimberly Drive. They are requesting to reduce the provision
to a 7 foot landscaping strip. Kim Hesse, Landscape Administrator supports this
request under the condition that berms or large plants are utilized in these areas.
e. The Master Street Plan indicates Wimberly Drive as a collector street which
requires 35 feet of right of way The applicant is requesting a waiver of the 35
feet and proposing that only 25 feet be required. The request will need to be
decided by City Council.
2. Signs need to be indicated on the plans.
• 3. A ramp and access aisles or spaces with direct access to the building are needed in order
to comply with ADA regulations.
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 5
4. Approval is subject to all Plat Review and Subdivision comments.
5. Staff must approve final detailed plans, specifications and calculations for grading,
drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets, sidewalks, parking lots and tree
preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for
general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and
approval All improvements shall comply with the City's current requirements.
6. Sidewalks must be constructed in accordance with current standards to include a 6 foot
sidewalk with a minimum 10 foot green space along Millsap Drive.
7. Large Scale Development approval is valid for one calendar year.
8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required:
a. Grading and drainage permits
b. Separate easement plat
c. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the
City as required by § 158.01 to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further,
all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be
completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
9. All new utilities are required to be underground.
10. If the dumpster is visible from the public right of way, it will need to be screened.
Commission Discussion
Hoffman: I believe this is for the Northwest Arkansas Pediatric Clinic.
Conklin: This is a request for large scale development. We have a letter regarding the
request for additional parking which is based on the Northwest Arkansas Pediatric Clinic going
into this facility. The applicant has requested 130 parking spaces. 39 of the parking spaces will
have to be approved by conditional use and that is a separate action which will be brought
forward to the Planning Commission meeting. They have submitted the application for a lot line
adjustment along the south to provide for additional parking. A landscape variance is being
requested. A waiver is requested on dedication of right of way. Wimberly was classified as a
collector street on February 16, 1999. That is a change. Originally is was to the north and when
Washington County built their health facility in that location, we reclassified Wimberly Drive to
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 6
Futrall and Monte Painter as a collector street. This property was exempted from the Design
Overlay District in 1997. At that time, you saw this project in a different configuration and with
a larger building. That project was denied. The concern at that time was inadequate parking for
a proposed retail facility. Also, underground utilities were an issue This proposal is
significantly less than the previous proposal. Commercial Design Standards apply. The building
elevations are available for review. Cross access is proposed from this development to the
development south on Millsap. This committee needs to address compliance with Commercial
Design Standards and parking issues which will need to be addressed with the full Commission
as a part of the conditional use request. A property line adjustment is requested in order to have
more land to accommodate additional parking. Approval of this Large scale development will be
contingent upon approval of the property line adjustment. The 15 foot landscape buffer along
Millsap and Wimberly is addressed as a variance. They are requesting to reduce that to a 7 foot
landscaping strip. Kim Hesse has supported this request under the condition that larger plants
and berms be utilized in this area. Issues with the Master Street Plan and the request to dedicate
less than the standard will have to go forward to the City Council. Wimberly Drive is currently
31 feet from back of curb to back of curb. A collector street is 36 feet. We are not
recommending that the developer do any of the improvements. It would be 2.5 feet of widening
on Wimberly Drive to meet the collector street standard. Normally, the City would pay for that
and it is not in the Capital Improvements Program. If at some point, we funded widening of
Wimberly Drive, we would be able to do so by cutting into the green space area between the
sidewalk and curb. The collector street standard in our Master Street Plan allows parking on
both sides of the street. The existing 31 feet could function as a collector street. Signs will need
to be address and they need to present those today. Staff did not review those at our In House
Plat Review meeting.
Rutherford: They've made the correction I asked I for.
Hoffman: Would the right of way dedication affect what you've done?
Rutherford: No.
Petrie: I don't have comments at this time.
Hoffman: Have you had an opportunity to review the drainage plan?
Petrie: They are acceptable as preliminary. We will expect final numbers before
improvements are made.
Hesse: They are short on trees in the islands. Maybe 1 or 2.
• Bates: At Plat Review, I thought we discussed lining the back property line with trees
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 7
Hesse: I haven't walked this. You almost have a hardship. We've looked at adding trees
in other places to meet the interior landscaping before. Regarding the waiver, I'm not sure they
need it because they really aren't that short. I would support this plan. I would like to see the
finalized landscape plan with larger shade trees:
Hoffman: I would like to address the parking waiver first. Is this request unusual or is it in
line with the use? Why do we have so many parking waiver requests for more parking?
Conklin: Typically, the parking waiver requests are for restaurants. Our ordinance does not
allow enough parking for restaurants.
Hoffman: What about banks?
Conklin: I think we've addressed and amended the parking issues for banks. It's
restaurants that are the problem. I think by allowing the 20% over it is working and I wouldn't
propose any changes to restaurants or banks at this time.
Hoffman: So this is a professional office use?
Conklin: To clarify, is this entirely for the pediatric clinic?
Bates: Danny Smith and Don Mobley are here. I think there is retail proposed as well.
Mobley: There's almost 5,000 square feet of retail.
Hoffman: So 5,000 square feet are for a separate use.
Mobley: Somewhere between 4,600 to 4,800 square feet will be a lease space which is
intended to be retail.
Hoffman: How does that effect our ratios?
Conklin: I think the retail has been calculated into parking.
Bates: The plan shows 4,700 square feet at the retail ratio of 1 space per every 200
square feet and the rest is doctor's office at 1 space per every 300. That is how we came up with
91 spaces. We went back and looked at North Hills and the whole area was 1 space per 200
square feet according to the plat. The parking across the street is all 1 per 200 ratio.
Hoffman: Has the applicant had an opportunity to do an actual study of your patient flow?
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 8
Mobley: Yes, we have. There is a letter on file that addresses that. The pediatric business
is based on the number of exam rooms and number of employees in the clinic and the number of
people in the waiting room. That is addressed in the letter. I think the total is 125.
Bates: They have about 50 employees.
Ward: The letter has 43 non -physician employee parking spaces.
Conklin: They have 2 other facilities. One is in Colt Square and the Sick Child on Joyce
and I'm not sure what parking they have for those 2 facilities.
Hoffman: So, is this going to be a combination of.those 2 facilities? Will everybody be in
one spot?
Bates: Yes.
Mobley: They have a sick waiting room and a well waiting room.
Hoffman: For those 2 facilities, could you give me an approximation of what parking is in
place now andwhat you are proposing for the new facility?
Bates: How many employees do you have now when you combine both?
Tate: We have 43 non -physician employees, 11 physicians, and 4 nurse practitioners
and psychologists.
Hoffman: So, that's a total of 60 people? When I go to the doctor, there are 10 people in
the waiting room and they're all signed up for the same doctor at the same time.
Tate: We have 29 exam rooms on the sick side and 9 exam rooms on the well side and
we will have 10 physicians working at that facility at the same time.
Hoffman: So, if you have 50 patients and 60 employees, we have 110 parking spaces
needed.
Conklin: You would look at the additional 46 for the 4,800 square feet of sales at 1 space
per 200 square feet.
Bates: That's 21, I believe.
Conklin: They're requesting 130 spaces.
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 9
Hoffman: I would like for you to revise your letter for the Planning Commission. Detail the
number of employees on site; the number of exam rooms; and, patient load.
Conklin: The letter from the Pediatric Clinic states there will be 45 exam rooms. Would
you like an accounting of what their existing facilities have as far as exam rooms and doctors?
Hoffman: Good idea. I am reluctant to add parking when it's not necessary but if you can
prove that it's needed, then we will look at it. We need to also look at it in terms of what's being
done in terms of landscaping and the street issue. Those 3 issues are interconnected. Proving
that you need the parking is important.
Conldin: I agree. I know Wischmeyer Architects specialize in medical office design. If
you have other data or information from around the country on other projects that you have done,
that would be helpful for staff and the Commission.
Odom. The 20% overage would allow up to 110 spaces. Is that right? 91 are required but
don't they get 20% overage?
Conklin: The 91 is with the 20% overage.
Hoffman: We have routinely been doing other medical facilities. Have we had this request
for other projects?
Conklin: I don't remember.
Warrick: You have granted additional parking for a project which will be constructed on
Millsap Road. That's Millsap Medical Center.
Hoffman: Is that under construction now?
Warrick: Yes.
Hoffman: Let's take a look at it. How much bigger was that building?
Conklin: It was 28,000 square feet and it is 2 story.
Hoffman: It was a multi tenant building.
Tate: In pediatrics, it is not uncommon that we have the babysitter who brings the
patient in and then the grandparents or parents or both meet at the clinic. That could be 3 spaces
taken up for 1 patient.
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 10
Hoffman: That's a true statement. However, we want to encourage everyone going in 1 car.
I would like specifics from other areas ready by Agenda Session..
Conklin: This is a separate conditional use request. We will post a separate sign and do a
separate report with a separate recommendation on that.
Hoffman: I would like our traffic engineer to make a report, please. I would like his opinion
on the parking lot configuration in terms of the number of extra parking spaces and a report on
the decreased right of way width.
Conklin: We talked to the City Engineer about the right of way width and he agreed that the
36 feet wasn't necessary in this location. We're not giving up anything, we're just requesting
them to make a dedication.
Hoffman: I don't like the idea of not getting everything we could.
Conklin: One of the reasons why staff has supported this request is that this lot is pie
shaped and there are Master Street Plan streets on 2 sides. The Master Street Plan was revised
less than a year ago on this street. This was exempted from the Overlay District. This lot was
platted prior to these current ordinances and it is very difficult to try and get everything on this
lot that they want to do. Staff looked at the street and how it is functioning and could it function
as a 31 foot collector street. That is why we supported it.
Bates: Was the Master Street Plan revised before or after North Hills Boulevard was
moved to the east?
Conklin: I'm not sure on the timing of that. The MSP was revised on February 16, 1999.
Hoffman: I think that would be helpful. I don't want to leave too much Committee work for
Planning Commission.
Petrie: I need to clarify what you want the traffic engineer to look at.
Hoffman: I would like to know the number of parking spaces, vehicle counts per day, and
trips per day, based on this use. Can we talk about cross access? I'm referring to the existing
asphalt parking and concrete drive noted at the corner of the plan. Is that 24 foot area cross
access? What is the tree there?
Mobley: Those are existing trees through there which will have to be removed or relocated.
• Hoffman: Okay.
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 11
Mobley: That's cross access and additional parking behind the existing buildings. We're
moving the dumpster from the street to behind the building.
Hoffman: Will there be parking on another site? Is that what is shown?
Conklin: That is an existing developed office building to the east. They are proposing to
add cross access and relocate that dumpster to the south which is behind the building.
Hoffman: Will the asphalt parking and railroad tie trim be relocated?
Mobley: It will not be affected in any way. We're going around it. It's not tied into this
project at all.
Hoffman: Okay, but your property line goes right through the middle of it.
Mobley: Yes, it does.
Hoffman: If it's parking for that office building, what's going to happen?
Mobley: He owns both properties.
Conklin: For clarification, all that will remain back there. You are not proposing to remove
any of that.
Smith: No.
Conklin: What is that parking for?
Smith: It's for the building there.
Conklin: And it was built because there wasn't room up front?
Smith: Right.
Hoffman: The question I have is if one of the other properties was sold, would you execute a
parking easement or something with yourself?
Conklin: This parking wasn't required by the city. He could do a property line adjustment
to adjust around it and keep it with the office property. It would be easy to do.
• Smith: Property line adjustment.
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 12
Hoffman: I'm just trying to avoid a problem.
Ward: Is there a power line going through there?
Conklin: That is overhead electric and it is over the threshold of the ordinance.
Mobley: It's on the next page of your plans.
Hoffman: Is there any need for another access on the south end of the property?
Conklin: We looked at that and I wanted to bring that up today. It was not discussed at In -
House Review. I would not be a bad idea to have cross access on that southeast corner for future
development.
Mobley: Going which way?
Conklin: Going to the east.
• Hoffman: I'm not sure I support the waiver for the right of way.
Conklin: You would need 36 feet if there was a center turn lane. A turn lane isn't
necessary. Also, a 36 foot street would allow for parking on both sides. In the North Hills
Medical Park, they are providing parking on site.
•
Public Comment
None.
Further Commission Discussion
Mobley: Would you like to see the signs?
Conklin: We need to discuss the elevations. I'd like the architect to go over the building
materials and have him explain how the architectural elements of this building tie into the overall
development.
Mobley: What we attempted to do was match the North Hills Medical Park brick and
banding of the brick as seen on the elevations. We have been before the North Hills
Architectural Review Committee, to discuss the roof and they gave us their permission to use
composition shingles as opposed to the metal.
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 13
Hoffman: In what color?
Mobley: Well, that's to be decided. We have shown a light green but we have not selected
anything. It will depend on if we can get the brick to match and that will dictate what will be
selected. The gables that you see will be EFTS or Drivet which is the trade name. We anticipate
signage for the clinic in the gable area and freestanding signs to be determined.
Hoffman: We have the north and west elevations. What about east and south?
Mobley: You will only see one wall looking directly on. We will get those on the
construction document. What you see on the roof is a center core and that will be a flat area of
roof where we will set the heating and air conditioning units. That's hard to show on a drawing.
Hoffman: So there is a raised effect around the equipment.
Mobley: Yes. There is a pitched roof with a recessed area.
Hoffman: I was worried about a long blank wall along the back.
Conklin: When you went to. the Architectural Review Committee, did they review the plans
or address the issue of exemption from the Overlay District? Alett Little granted the exemption
and she required compliance with the North Hills Medical Park covenants. In those covenants, it
talks about a 15 foot landscape area from the property line. Did they grant you approval for less
than 15 feet that you are proposing today?
Mobley: I don't think we addressed that at this time. It was granted previously.
Conklin: I would like for you to go back and have them make a decision on that issue and
give us a letter of determination. I want to make sure you are complying and have the proper
exemptions. There was a variance granted for that requirement in 1997 but I would like for them
to look at this one and get us a letter.
Hoffman: Can you have that for us by the Agenda Session on January 20?
Mobley: I would say that we can. Yes, we can do that.
Hoffman: Are you proposing freestanding signs?
Mobley: I think that we will. Danny and I discussed that yesterday. I think we will want
one at the intersection of Wimberly and Futrall. We're thinking about a monument sign 5 feet in
height and 10 feet in length. Something like that.
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 14
Hoffman: Is that in the sight line from the corner?
Conklin: I will have to take a look at that.
Mobley: We'll locate it so that it will be a safe distance.
Hoffman: So, you are proposing just one, monument sign.
Conklin: We'll need an elevation with the dimensions on that.
Mobley: Do we need that for the resubmittal?
Conklin: Yes. City Planning will only sign off on signs which are approved by the
Planning Commission. So, if you come back with additional signs, you'll have to go back to
Planning Commission and get those approved.
Mobley: What about signage on the building?
• Conklin: I don't know if you are proposing a sign in the circular vent area in the EFTS.
Mobley: We intend to do something across the bottom of the gable.
Conklin: Okay.
Mobley: We can show that on the elevation if we need to.
•
Conklin: You need to show it. I know what you want to do now. It will be a rectangle and
it will be located at the bottom. I have no problem with that proposal.
Hoffman: I guess if the review committee approves the roof, we will need a letter on that.
Are there any other buildings in that area that don't have the green metal?
Mobley: The County Health Department has a composition roof.
Hesse: On the preservation of the maples on Wimberly, I would like some flexibility.
We're pretty much at grade and it may get crowded and they could get confused and damage the
root system. I would like to do inspections and if needed require replacement with medium trees
at a later time. When the City replaced the sidewalk along North Hills I was amazed at how
shallow the roots were. I want to look at that during construction and have the authority to
require replacement if necessary.
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 15
Hoffman: Let's get memorialized on the plat with a note.
Conklin: The lines that we see in the brick, what are those?
Mobley: They are a darker color brick. I believe North Hills is slightly recessed. It is a
darker color, banded brick.
Conklin: When you pull the permit for this, we'll have the same number and type of lines
going across the front.
Mobley: Yes.
Ward: I think it's real important that you do some research on other pediatric clinics
around the area or nation on the parking issue. I understand that compared to other medical
clinics pediatrics need a lot more parking. You need to prove that to a committee of 9 people.
MOTION
Commissioner Ward made a motion to forward LSD99-27 to the full Planning Commission
subject to all the conditions and resolution of all waiver requests.
Commissioner Odom seconded the motion.
Hoffman: On the resubmittal, you need to have your sign elevations, landscaping note, cross
access, and finalization of your lot line adjustment. Staff needs to provide the engineer's traffic
report for the parking lot and right of way Also, you need to update your letter regarding the
need for parking spaces.
Edwards. We will also look for a letter from the Architectural Review Committee approving
the building elevations and the 15 foot green space requirement.
•
Subdivision Conunittee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 16
LSD99-17: LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT
SPRING CREEK CENTRE, PP174
This item was submitted by Roger Trotter of Development Consultants, Inc. on behalf of
Developers diversified for property located in lots 3A and 4R of Spring Park Subdivision. The
property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial, and contains approximately 5.488 acres.
Bradley McLaurin was present on behalf of this item.
Committee Discussion
Conklin: Old Navy has revised their elevation and I wanted to submit them to you today to
see if you are comfortable approving the changes at this level. You have approved this. Bed
Bath & Beyond has been constructed and is open.
Hoffman: I have a procedural question, if this wasn't advertised, can we do this? Can we
have this meeting?
Conklin: I was asked if we can approve this administratively I'm trying to figure out how
much of a change triggers what you would want to see again. If this is a substantial change it
may need to go to the entire Commission or you can approve this at this level. Once Bed Bath &
Beyond was constructed, Old Navy wanted a larger front on their building. They are change the
front of the building and changed the colors incorporating more gray.
McLaurin: The original one is white. All their buildings are white. There is nothing white in
this development. There is a light, gray Drivet across the street.
Conklin: I administratively approved the continuation of the band along this side. I thought
it looked better.
Hoffman: Is the landscaping still in place?
Conklin: Everything is the same. All they're asking is if they can take the front and expand
it out and use the gray color.
Odom: The red portion will remain?
McLaurin: That is a separate retail space for a separate tenant but it will remain the red
Drivet.
Ward: I don't see much difference.
•
•
Subdivision Committee Minutes
January 13, 2000
Page 17
Odom: I don't think it's substantial enough to send it back to the full Commission. Is this
going to be back lit?
McLaurin: Yes. Their stores are typically back lit.
Conklin: This is all glass.
McLaurin: It's not very bright but it is back lit.
Hoffman: Does the whole area count as the sign and does it meet the sign ordinance? If it's
back lit, I would tend to view it as a sign.
Conklin: Hastings in Fiesta Square back lit their entire canopy.
McLaurin: The lights inside of there are shining on the back wall of the store and not on the
glass. It's a reflected light and not direct.
Conklin: Under our sign ordinance, we do not regulate things that are placed on the inside
of the windows.
McLaurin: The lights are inside the store.
Odom: I'm okay with it. It's essentially the same thing.
McLaurin: There is a sign on the side which is not reflected on those drawings. It's on the
west side of the store. That sign is back lit with fluorescent.
Hoffman: That's fine. I don't have a problem with that. I'm concerned about light pollution
and what we do about the sign interpretation issue.
Conklin: It's 150 square feet or 20% which ever is greater. They will meet that.
Odom: If it wasn't articulated it would be a problem.
Hoffman: Okay.
Ward: Okay.
Odom: Okay.
Meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m.
•
Subdivision Committee
Table of Contents
2000
Item Considered:
FP99-9 Woodlands, pp 168
LSD99-27 Northpark Place II, pp 212
LSD99-17 Spring Creek Centre, pp 174
FP99-8 Covington Park II, pp 295
LSD99-22 Butterfield Trial Village, pp 175
LSD00-1 Interface Computer Center, pp 286
LS00-1 Candlewood Development, pp 294
FP00-1 Barrington Parke, Ph II, pp 373
LSD00-3 City of Fayetteville Airport, pp 795
LS00-2 Walker, pp 256
PP00-1 Yorktowne, Ph III, pp 214
LSD00-4 CMIS, pp 214
LSD00-5 Steele Crossing, pp 212
LS00-7 Yogi & Boo Boo, pp 175
•
P00-2 Quail Creek Ph III, pp 250
S00-6 Wedington Place, Lot 3R, pp 401
LSD00-7 Indian Springs, Ph II, pp 372
LS00-9 Ayecock, pp 368
LSD00-8 McDonald's, pp 401
LSD00-2.10 Atlas Construction, pp 367
AD00-11 Nelms, pp 248
Discussion of Drive -In theater on Hwy 112
LS00-11 & 15 Hahn, pp 651
LS00-12 Southerland, pp 520
LS00-13 Nelson, pp 173
LS00-14 Hooker Construction, pp 209
LSD00-9 Hooker Construction, pp 209
LSD00-9 Hooker Construction, pp 209
LSD00-10 City of Fayetteville Water & Sewer
Operations Center, pp 638
LSD00-11 Ozark Electric Cooperative Corp, pp
AD00-17 Garroutte, pp 137
LSD00-7.10 PUD Indian Springs, Ph II, pp 372
LS00-17 Gladden, pp 167
LS00-18 Anders/Bryan pp 141
.S00-19 Baggett, pp 529
Date:
1/13/00
1/13/00
1/13/00
2/3/00
2/3/00
2/17/00
2/17/00
3/16/00
3/16/00
3/16/00
3/16/00
3/16/00
3/16/00
3/30/00
3/30/00
3/30/00
4/13/00
4/13/00
4/13/00
4/27/00
4/27/00
4/27/00
5/11/00
5/11/00
5/11/00
5/11/00
5/11/00
6/1/00
6/1/00
4406/1/00
6/1/00
6/1/00
6/15/00
6/15/00
6/15/00
Action Taken:
Approved
Forward
Changes Approved
Approved
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Forwarded with Revisions
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Approved
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Approved
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Approved
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Forwarded to Planning Commission
Approved
Approved to submit LSD
Approved
Approved
Approved
Tabled
Tabled
Forwarded
Approved
Forwarded
Forwarded
Forwarded
Forwarded
Forwarded
Approved
Item Considered:
SDO�Hampton Parking, pp 245
LSD00-13 State Fair Cinema, pp 209
AD00-21 Fayetteville City Schools, pp 372
LSD00-14 Trinity Temple, 252
LS00-16 Gale, pp 60
LS00-22 Martin, pp 609
LS00-20 & 24 Eckles, pp 168
FP00-2 Millennium Place, pp 177
LSD00-16 Keating Enterprises, Inc. pp 289
LSD00-15 Lake Hills Church, pp 255
LSD00-17 McDonald's, pp 134
LS00-24 Middlebrook, pp 140
LS00-25 Krueger, pp 255
LSD00-19 Bradley, pp 177
LSD00-20 Cornerstone, pp 402
LSD00-22 St. Joseph Catholic Church, pp 373
LSD00-15 Lake Hill's Church, pp 55
AD00-29 Arkansas National Bank, pp 401
AD00-30 WRMC, pp 212
LSD00-25 Air BP, pp 795
•SD00-20 Bradley, pp 177
LSD00-22 St. Joseph Catholic Church, pp 373
AD00-30 WRMC, pp 212
LSD00-18.10 L&E Equity Investments, LLC,
pp, 177
LSD00-24 Stephens, pp 212
LS00-26 Schmitt, pp 298
FP00-3 Summersby, pp 410
LS00-30 Palmer, pp 572
LS00-29 & 33 Pursley, pp 140
LSD00-27 Emad Damen Duplex Units, pp 364
AD00-34 Frazer, pp 520
LSD00-29 The Mill District LLC, pp 523
LS00-30 Palmer, pp 572
AD00-35 Trinity Temple, pp 252
LS00-36 Tipton, pp 475
LSD00-31 Dixie Development, pp 176
FP00-4 Covington Park Phase IV, pp 265
LS00-38 Wilkins, pp 221
LS00-39 Wilkins, pp 221
-SD00-31 Dixie Development, pp 176
Date:
6/15/00
6/15/00
6/15/00
6/29/00
6/29/00
6/29/00
6/29/00
6/29/00
6/29/00
7/13/00
7/13/00
8/3/00
8/3/00
8/3/00
8/3/00
8/3/00
8/3/00
8/17/00
8/17/00
8/17/00
8/17/00
8/31/00
8/31/00
8/31/00
8/31/00
8/31/00
9/14/00
9/14/00
9/14/00
9/14/00
9/28/00
9/28/00
9/28/00
9/28/00
10/12/00
10/12/00
10/12/00
11/2/00
11/2/00
11/12/00
Action Taken:
Approved
Approved
Approved
Forwarded
Approved
Forwarded
Approved
Approved
Forwarded
Tabled
Forwarded
Forwarded
Forwarded
Forwarded
Forwarded
Tabled
Forwarded
Approved
Approved
Approved
Forwarded
Forwarded
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Forwarded
Tabled
Approved
Forwarded
Approved
Forwarded
Approved
Approved
Approved
Tabled
Approved
Tabled
Tabled
Forwarded
item Considered:
AD00-41 Nantucket Apt., pp 563
LSD99-6 Millsap Center, pp 212
LS00-27 Schmitt, pp 298
LSD00-30 St. Paul's Episcopal Church, pp 484
LSD00-33 Lots 13-16 Millennium Place
AD00-42 Tri-State Precast, pp 756
AD Glennwood (sign)
AD LSD00-20
LSD00-32 Park Apt., pp 175
LS00-41 Lot 5, Wedington Place, pp 401
LS00-42 Fazoli's, pp 213
LSD00-34 Fazoli's, pp 213
LSD00-35 Hooker, pp 209
LSD99-21 Bank of Fayetteville
LSD98-15.10 Kantz Place
LSD00-27 Emad Damen Duplex Units, pp 364
AD00-42 McCollum Avenue/Willoughby Road
•
•
Date:
11/12/00
11/12/00
11/12/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/16/00
11/30/00
11/30/00
11/30/00
11/30/00
11/30/00
11/30/00
11/30/00
12/28/00
12/28/00
Action Taken -
Approved with Conditions
Approved
Approved with Conditions
Forwarded
Forwarded
Tabled
Approved
Approved
Forwarded
Approved
Approved
Forwarded
Forwarded
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved