HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-23 - MinutesMINUTES OF THE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
OF THE FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
A meeting of the Subdivision Committee of the Fayetteville
Planning Commission was held on Thursday April 23, 1987 at 3:30
p.m. in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 West
Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Stan Green and B.J. Dow
MEMBERS ABSENT: Frank Farrish
SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE -LSD
71 BYPASS & WEDINGTON - LEN EDENS
The first item of consideration was the Large Scale Dev elopment
submitted by Len Edens for Self -Storage Warehouses. Represented
by Evan Wimberly and James Cameron, of Northwest Engineers,
property located at Wedington and the 71 bypass, and zoned C-2,
Thoroughfare Commercial.
Mr. Camerson stated they were proposing self -storage warehouses
south of the existing Liquor Store. Mr. Camerson said they would
provide screening to the adjoining R-2 property which would
consist of a 6' chain link fence with slats.
Dow asked if the 19 required spaces had been added, and Mr.
Cameron replied "yes" they were added.
Green asked if proof of notification of the adjoining property
owners had been submitted to the Planning Office.
Wimberly stated the ad was ran in last nights paper. Carlisle
asked Mr. Wimberly to bring in the tear sheet for proof of
notification. Wimberly added this would also go before the full
Planning Commission because code required a conditional use for
warehouses in C-2 District.
MOTION
Dow moved to approve the Large Scale Development for self -storage
warehouses subject to: 1) plat review comments; 2) conditional
use approval and; 3) proof of notification of adjoining property
owners, seconded by Green. The motion to approve passed 2-0-0.
Carlisle advised the address would be 1037 N. Shiloh.
aZ
Subdivision Committee
• April 23, 1987
Page 2
•
•
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT
ROBERT WHITFIELD - GARLAND TERRACES, SYCAMORE & GARLAND
The second item of consideration was the preliminary Subdivision
Plat submitted by P.R. Green Trust, and represented by Robert
Whitfield. Property located at the northeast corner of Garland
and Sycamore, and zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential District.
Mr. Whitfield added the name had been changed from Oakland
Terraces to Garland Terraces.
Dow said he had reduced the stipulation of the Bill of Assurance
which restricted 9 home per acre to 4 units above R-1.
Whitfield said he had also changed the look of tandem lots to
front to back lots which would take care of the easement
problems.
Carlisle noted that Mr. Whitfield had not signed the Bill of
Assurance as yet. Mr. Whitfield said he would be in the Planning
Office prior to Monday before the Planning Commission to sign the
Bill of Assurance.
Mr. Whitfield noted that lot number 17 and lot number 1 had
existing homes that would either be demolished or improved.
Green asked what would the access be for the lots that face
Garland. Mr. Whitfield said the State Highway Department had
approved curb cuts for each lot on Garland. He said the cuts
would amount to 5 cuts. Carlisle noted she would need to have a
copy of the Highway permits from the State with approval seals on
them.
Dow asked if was not feasible to access the lots on Garland from
the inside street. Mr. Whitfield said they could do that, but
thought the proposed design would give a different product. He
said they would build on one side of the lot with a privacy fence
to the fire wall, giving the look of a free-standing home from
the street on both sides.
Dow asked if that would be consistent with plans of Garland being
4 -lanes, and adding more accesses on to it. Mr. Whitfield said
he thought the State was approving something that was already in
existence.
Green said if the State Highway Department agreed to that
configuration he did not see the problem.
Green asked if Mr. Whitfield was planning on widening Sycamore
2>
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee
April 23, 1987
Page 3
Street at that intersection. Mr. Whitfield said he would be
required to improve that portion of Sycamore with a Bill of
Assurance. Carlisle said Mr. Whitfield wad dedicating additional
land and that dedication would show up on the final plat. Green
said, but Mr. Whitfield was not really required to improve
Sycamore, and Carlisle said Don Bunn did not require anything,
but Mr. Whitfield had offered additional ROW. Green added that
Mr. Whitfield needed to understand what was required and what
was not required. Green said Mr. Whitfield was not required
automatically to widen the street, and Dow said the Commission
did not know exactly what should be required. Green said the
Commission did know exactly and that was a true statement. Green
said McCord had told them over and over that the Planning
Commission had to make that determination. Green said they had
other situations like Jim Lindseys apartments on Gregg Street
where he dedicated more ROW than he was required to, and they did
not require anything on the street.
Carlisle stated Mr. Whitfield was giving 15' of additional ROW
that was not required. Green said so Mr. Whitfield was giving
approximately twice as much ROW than he would be required.
Dow said she was afraid this would have to go into their limbo
pile unitl the City Board could give the Commission more input on
what they want on the off-site improvements.
Dow asked if the fire hydrant had been relocated, and Mr.
Whitfield said the fire hydrant had been relocated in between
lots 18 and 19.
Carlisle said sidewalks would be required on the north side of
Sycamore and the east side of Garland. Carlisle said she hoped
the Planning Commission would accept a Bill of Assurance for
those sidewalks on Sycamore and Garland.
Dow asked if proof of notification had been submitted. Mr.
Whitfield said he would have all the green cards at the Planning
Commission meeting.
Carlisle stated the Parks Board had already determined the parks
fee for Garland Terraces.
MOTION
Dow moved to approve the preliminary plat subject to: 1) Bill of
Assurance for sidewalks on the north side of Sycamore and the
east side of Garland; 2) Bill of Assurance for the Density (not
to exceed 9 residences per acre); 3) proof of notification of
adjoining property owners; 4) lots 14, 15, 16, 18 & 19 to access
23
Subdivision Committee
• April 23, 1987
Page 4
•
•
Noel Ave. opposed to Garland Ave. and; 5) off-site improvements
will be determined pending the decision of the Board of
Directors.
Motion died for lack of second.
Green said this would go on to the full Planning Commission for
further discussion.
a4