HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-01-08 - Minutes•
MINUTES OF THE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE
OF THE FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
A meeting of the Subdivision Committee of the Fayetteville Planning
Commission was held on Thursday January 8, 1987 at 3:30 P.M. in Room
111 of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street,
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Frank Farrish, B.J. Dow and Stan Green
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ernie Jacks
HAYS ADDITION PHASE I - PRELIMINARY PLAT
SOUTH OF MISSION BLVD., WEST OF HWY 265 - J.B. HAYS
The only item of consideration was the preliminary plat of Hays Addition
Phase I, submitted by J.B. Hays and represented by Dave Jorgensen
of Albright & Associates, property located south of Mission Blvd west
of Hwy 265, zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District and containing
2.75 acres.
Dave Jorgensen stated the plat was a proposed subdivision adjacent
to Phase I of Park Place subdivision. He said Hays was proposing
7 lots. The biggest item was he planned to cut into the existing
cul-de-sac at Bristol Place and extend the proposed road into the
subdivision to the west. Jorgensen said he would be splitting 25'
off of lots 10 & 11 of Park Place Phase I and would propose the required
25' building setback. He said lot 10 would be tight to build on and
would have to be a triangle or "L" shaped house and lot 11 would have
buildable space.
Dow asked if lots 4 & 5 had been changed to reflect the required 70'
of frontage and Jorgensen said they had revised the layout to reflect
the 70' dimension for those lots. Dow asked how did he did that and
Jorgensen said he moved the property line on the west side of lot
3 over to the east so there would be the 70' minimum which allowed
them to move the remaining lots around.
Jorgensen stated they would revise or replat phase I of Park Place
to reflect the change of Bristol Place from a cul-de-sac to an extending
street to the west. Jorgensen said Hays proposed to provide a gravel
surface turn -a -round for the sanitation truck on the north side of
the proposed subdivision. He said the north of that would be the
proposed phase II of Hays Addition.
Jorgensen said there was an island in the cul-de-sac with a light
in the middle and at this point they had not determined whether it
would be in the best interest to leave the island or not, but his
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee
January 8, 1987
Page 2
thinking was it might be best to leave the island. He said they would
probably smooth off the radius where it would turn into the proposed
road.
Dow asked out of curiosity why they were calling this proposed subdivision
Hays Addition Phase I as opposed to Phase 7 of Park Place.
Jorgensen said J.B. Hays preferred the proposed subdivision as Hays
Addition and was not sure why.
Carlisle asked if the Park Place covenants would apply to this subdivision
and Jorgensen said he did not think so. Jorgensen said he did not
know for a fact but thought Dr. Hays wanted to let the people who
lived in the proposed subdivision have use of the recreational facilities
of Park Place.
In answer to a question from Commissioner Green, Jorgensen said the
sidewalk on Bristol Place extends up to lot 12 and ends. Green said
the minutes reflect the sidewalk to connect with the existing sidewalk
on Bristol Place but as he remembered the deal that was made was that
there would be a sidewalk on both sides of Cambridge and none on the
cul-de-sac.
Farrish said the replat of Phase I Park Place lots 10 & 11 would require
sidewalk to tie in to the proposed subdivision.
Dewitt Smith, home owner in the Park Place Subdivision (lot 12 of
Phase I) stated his comments related to the portion which was the
connection to the required replat of Park Place Phase I. He said
he did not have comments about the proposed subdivision other than
if the residents did participate in the Park Place amenities then
they would necessarily have to be members of the Park Place Master
Association or be granted through that association some kind of a
legal right to do so. Mr Smith stated he was objecting to the proposed
replat of Bristol Place cul-de-sac. He said the original master plan
of Park Place extending through 6 phases and including the area that
extends out to Hwy 265 did not reflect any indication of activity
to the west of Bristol Place; in fact it was reasonable to look at
the plan and anticipate that those in fact are cul-de-sacs. He said
he owned one lot out of five on the cul-de-sac in question. He said
the result of the proposed replat would mean lots 10 & 11 were diminished
in size significantly enough that a house built on those lots would
be dramatically limited to how it could be fitted with the required
setbacks and houses on lots 10 & 11 would have to access to the new
road for their driveways. He said the throat was almost entirely
taken up by the new road coming in and would be impossible to access
to the cul-de-sac and would result in the orientation of those houses
being entirely different from what was originally intended on the
cul-de-sac. He said they would be oriented toward the new street
Z
•
•
Subdivision Committee
January 8, 1987
Page 3
and would put him in a situation of having 3 back yards turned to
him rather than a side yard. He objects to this very negative proposal
in terms of what it would do to those two lots and diminish them in
value and consequently adversely affect his property value on lot
12. He said it was not a good plan to allow cul-de-sacs which had
been defined as such to be opened up unless everyone on the cul-de-
sac would adhere to the opening. He said what they would end up with
on that cul-de-sac was kind of a European round -a -bout thing.
Mr. Smith said two proposals were made, one to access off Hwy 45 and
the other which involved the Bristol access. He said that was not
a good plan for the subdivision and again he had no problem with Dr. Hays
doing whatever he needed to do or chose to do to the west as long
as he did not access it through Bristol Place cul-de-sac on the west
side of Cambridge Road. Mr. Smith said he would hope that the committee
would recommend back to the full commission something negative with
regard to that particular access.
Dow asked what the covenants said about replats. Carlisle read the
amendment to the covenants of assurance of Park Place filed for record
August 5, 1984, Section "K" "no lot shall be subdivided or replatted
except by approval in writing by the Environmental Control Committee".
Carlisle said the City could not enforce the covenants but that was
something the Park Place committee could do.
Mr. Smith said that committee was controlled by Dr. Hays and asked
if the Subdivision Committee could recommend or not recommend the
plat. Carlisle said the City or the Subdivision committee could not
enforce the Park Place covenants.
Dow asked if they should be considering the replat rather than the
preliminary plat.
Farrish said obviously they would have to approve a replat of Park
Place Phase I before the commission could approve the preliminary
plat.
Farrish stated when the Commission had discussed the concept plat
there had been serious objections to having access to Hwy 45.
Jorgensen said there was a general opinion of the Planning Commission
of the two alternatives that the Bristol Place Cul-de-sac was by far
the better alternative. Jorgensen said the access to Hwy 45 was in
a bad curve and a low area with low sight distance in each direction
and in addition to that there were already so many accesses to Hwy
45.
Farrish asked what the procedure was for a replat and Carlisle said
they would have to go through Plat Review, Subdivision and Planning
3
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee
January 8, 1987
Page 4
Commission.
Green said they could approve Hays Addition contingent upon the approval
of a replat for Park Place Phase I.
Green said he understood what Mr. Smith was saying and if he were
in his position he would feel the same way. Green said the problem
he had was he did not know what they could do about it. Dr. Hays
owns all the property involved including lots 10 & 11. Green said
he was sympathetic and felt it was not a good deal either but did
not see what they could do about because Dr. Hays was within his rights.
Mr. Smith said he had to disagree with that because he felt it was
within the Commission's authority to rule on the viability of that
type of replat in the cul-de-sac. In other words just the fact that
the two lots were controlled by Dr. Hays, he believed that all the
lots on the cul-de- sac were dramatically affected and felt it was
within the sphere of the Subdivision Committee and the Commission
to respond in that fashion. Mr. Smith said this should be no different
from a long established cul-de-sac that happened to have 2 vacant
lots and a vacant parcel behind it. He said he did not believe that
the Commission would look at it in the same fashion because that would
be somehow different.
Farrish said he would have to disagree with Mr. Smith because he did
not know how many times they had gotten subdivision plats presented
to them that were adjacent to and part of extensions of existing
neighborhoods and it was obvious the property values would not be
the same because of lot sizes to the existing subdivisions. Farrish
said the Commission had to totally ignore that because they had no
other choice.
Mr. Smith said his argument was not about the lot sizes in the new
subdivision and Dr. Hays had the right to do whatever he wanted there
but felt he should have a valid argument that the arbitrary or unilateral
changing of the character of the cul-de-sac should not be approved
unless there was unanimity within the cul-de-sac to do so.
In answer to a question from Commissioner Green, Carlisle stated the
grounds for denying subdivisions were: 1) the development plan is
not submitted in accordance with the requirements of this section;
2) the proposed development would violate a City Ordinance a State
Statute or Federal Statute; 3) the developer refuses to dedicate the
street ROW, utility easements or drainage easements required; 4) the
proposed development would create or compound a dangerous traffic
condition for the purpose of this section a dangerous traffic condition
shall be construed to mean a traffic condition in which the risk of
accidents involving motor vehicles is significant due to factor such
as but not limited to, high traffic volume, topography or the nature
•
•
Subdivision Committee
January 8, 1987
Page 5
of the traffic pattern; 5) City water & sewer is not readily available
and the developer has made no provision for extending such service;
6) the developer refuses to comply with paragraph 2b of this section
pertaining to the required on site and off site improvements.
•
Dow said she had some problem with the developer violating the covenants.
She said she would prefer everything to be done in order as to the
replat before the preliminary plat.
Green suggested they could approve the preliminary plat subject to
the approval of the replat of Park Place Phase I.
Dow said she thought she was one of the members who thought it was
a good idea not to go out to Hwy 45 when they had considered the concept
plat. She said she would almost like to look at that particular location
before she made a decision.
Green said he did not think it would bother him for the road to access
off of Hwy 45 but on the other hand if they had come in and asked
to have access off Hwy 45 he probably would not have said no.
Mr Smith said it had only recently come to light that this neccessitated
a replat and a replat should have invited interest from the affected
property owners. He said he did not even know there was a meeting
being held to consider the concept plat. He felt the issue should
be dealt with regarding the replat and was not seeking to turn down
the proposed subdivision. He said he was seeking a reason to turn
down a replat of Park Place Phase I. Mr. Smith said the access to
Hwy 45 would be a feasible thing and did not, in reasonable people's
judgement, create an unbearable traffic hazard to anyone and should
be given consideration as opposed to replatting an established cul-de-sac.
Green said the only thing they could do then was to deny this preliminary
plat or approve it subject to the replat. He said if they deny it
they had to have reasons for denying it.
Farrish said they could approve the plat subject to approval of the
replat of Park Place Phase I.
Green said the island and the bulge in the middle of the street bothered
him and if they would have brought that through the first time they
would not have approved it.
Farrish suggested that
give Mr. Smith some more
side some more land with
Green said if a straight
have been approved but a
the street go straight through and Dr. Hays
land and the rest of the folks on the other
curb and gutters.
street would have come in originally it would
new problem would be created with Mr. Smiths
S
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee
January 8, 1987
Page 6
driveway which would not go out at that point.
Mr. Smith asked if the approval of the plat was subject to the replat
and when the replat came back through, if he had equally as compelling
arguments, could the Planning Commission deny the replat and be fully
within their rights to deny the replat on the basis of an objection
from a property owner within Phase I Park Place. Green said he did
not know if that would necessarily be the case.
Dow stated she would like to have the plat researched by an attorney.
Green stated Mr. Smith was protected for better or worse by his covenants
and he recognized that Dr. Hays was probably the Environmental Control
Committee and he owned all the property affected here. He said he
did not know how to address that and did not think this Commission
could address that.
Dow said she would like to put this on hold until they could check
further into it and did not feel comfortable voting for it.
Mr. Smith asked if it would be appropriate for this Committee to request
an opinion from the City Attorney to rule on what reasons they would
have to deny this.
Carlisle stated she spoke with the City Attorney and he said the only
problem was the replat.
Dow asked Dave Jorgensen when they proposed the concept did they propose
the cul-de-sac because they thought the Planning Commission would
prefer that or was that what they wanted.
Jorgensen said they could go either way, Hwy 45 or Bristol Place,
but he felt there were already had too many access points onto Hwy
45.
Green asked if Dr. Hays was indifferent to whether the access was
off Hwy 45 or Bristol Place. Jorgensen said he really did not know
for sure.
Mr. Smith interjected that technically the approval process for the
concept was not technically handled correctly. Farrish then stated
the concept process bore no weight whatsoever. Mr. Smith said but
it was bearing weight in their minds because they had referred to
it several times.
Farrish asked what technically did
technically the procedure involves
and the replat of Park Place Phase
the property owner was not notified.
they do wrong and Mr. Smith said
a replat of Park Place Phase I
I affects that property of which
•
•
Subdivision Committee
January 8, 1987
Page 7
It was then discussed and Mr. Smith's property was within the 100'
of the notification clause to surrounding property owners.
Green stated if Mr. Smith was supposed to have been notified and was
not, then he did not have to opportunity to address the concept plat
and if this Commission did indeed steer Dr. Hays in the Bristol Place
direction without Mr Smith being there to have a chance for his input
then it seemed they owed Mr. Smith a chance to speak to the full Planning
Commission before they do anything.
MOTION
Dow moved to recommend another concept plat be presented to the Planning
Commission with proper notification of the adjoining property owners
so that all interested property owners could present all relevant
facts.
Green asked if that would create a timing problem and Jorgensen said
the concept had to go back to the Planning Commission for comments
on the connection to Hwy 265.
Farrish stated that complicated matters because the whole thing was
approved by the Planning Commission, including the access to Hwy 265.
The City Board did not agree with that approval and it was tabled
for other things to be worked out.
Green said he did not know what to do about Commissioner Dow's motion
because Hays did not have to bring the concept plat in to begin with
and thought he would be within his rights to ask the Committee to
act on the Subdivision one way or the other.
After further discussion it was made clear that the Committee was
not voting on the replat and that the vote from the preliminary plat
of Hays Addition would have no bearing on the replat of Park Place
Phase I.
MOTION
Green moved to recommend approval to the Planning Commission as presented
subject to: 1) plat review comments; 2) proof of notification of all
surrounding property owners and; 3) approval of the replat of Park
Place Phase I subdivision with the clear understanding that this
Commission was not taking a position on approval of the replat when
it is presented, seconded by Dow. The motion passed unanimously
• Green requested an opinion from the City Attorney any precedent to
deny the Subdivision before the replat was submitted.
PAGE
411 1
8
15
17
18
21
22
25
26
26
28
31
33
36
40
44
46
48
49
51
51
54
56
58
60
62
63
66
67
69
72
74
75
76
77
SCANNED
SUBJECT
PRELIMINARY PLAT (HAYS ADDITION PHASE I) HWY-45
REPLAT OF FINAL PLAT PARK PLACE PHASE I.J.B. HAYS
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT JIM LINDSEY APPLEBY STREET APARTMENTS
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT _ TANDY RESTAURANT SUPPLY HWY 112
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT CONDO PARKING LOT RAZORBACK & WALTON
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT SELF STORAGE WAREHOUSE 71 BYPASS & WEDINGTON
PRELIMINARY SUB. PLAT ROBERT WHITFIELD (GARLAND TERRACES) SYCAMORE
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES 1901 COMMERCE DRIVE
Large Scale Development, Social Service Add. 4044 N. College
Preliminary plat, hillside subdivsion, sam mathias
Preliminary plat, brookhollow subdivision ERC properties
Preliminary plat, Quail Creek, Wade Bishop
Large Scale Developmnet, Polarbek, College Park
Preliminary plat, spring hollow estates, Gordon Wilkins
Preliminary Plat, Zion Esates, Zamberlittei
Large Scale Development, Spe Dee Mart, Hoyett Greenwood
Discussion of Polarbek, College Park
Preliminary Plat, Wingoot Subdivision, James Webster
Large Scale Development, IBM Office, Flake & Company
Large Scale Development, Airways Freight, Edd Caudel
Large Scale Development, ABC Industries, Fred J. Derwin
Large Sale
Preliminary Plat Glennwood Addition, Dr. Glenn Hardy
Large Scale development Plan, Lake View Convalescent Home,
Preliminary Plat, Township Subdivision, Bill Lazenby
Preliminary Plat of Yorktowne square Phase III, Wade Bishop
Development Plan, Leo Heckathoth , Crossroads Plaza
Preliminary
Large.Scale
Large Scale
Preliminary
E.H.
Plat of Cedar Grove Estates, D.M. Tomlinson & Sam
Development, Lindsey Const, Lindsey Mercantile
development, Lindsey Const., Kantz Apartments
plat of Quail Ridge:Slib., Gerald Tomlinson & Bill
Large scale development of Rolling Hills Baptist Church,
Final plat for Spring Hollow Estates - Gordon Wilkins
Final plat of replat of lot 4, block 5 of Brophy Addition
Approval of final plat of Summerhill West Addition - eharles
DATE
01-08-87
01-22-87
03-05-87
03-05-87
03-05-87
04-23-87
04-23-87
05-07-87
07-09-87
07-09-87
07-23-87
08-20-87
08-20-87
09-10-87
09-24-87
09-24-87
10-08-87
10-08-87
11-05-87
11-05-87
03-23-88
03-23-88
Sonneman04-20-88
05-04-88
05-04-88
Mathias 05-04-88
05-04-88
05-04-88
Brooks 05-18-88
Layne Smith 05-18-88
06=08-88
- Ralph Brophy06-08-88
Approval of Large Scale Development
SWEPCO - Bob Waldren
78 Approval of preliminary subdivision
North Hills Medical Park:.
81 Preliminary
81 Large scale
Burckhart
82 Large scale
plat ofrthe Hunt
development plan
development
Sloan
of the Electrical Substation
& large scale development plan
Club Addition - Brad Wright
for the Village Apartments - John C.
for East
84 Final plat of the Graue Addition
84 Large scale development plan
Brothers Leasing Company
86 development plan
88- development plan
90 plan
91
94
Large scale
Large scale
Large scale
Masullo
Preliminary
development
Oaks Apartments -
Graue
Lindsey Construction
of Lewis Chrysler Dealership - Lewis
for Wilson Inn - Kemmons Wilson Co.
of Lakeshore Apartments - Lindsey Const.
of Ozark Cooperative Warehouse - Nick
plat of the Foster Addition - Mark Foster
Large scale development plan of the Cummings -Star Apartments -
Steve Cummings
08-03-88
08-03288
08-03-88
09-07-88
09-07-88
09-07-88
09-21-88
09-21-88
09-21-88
10-19-88
11-09-88
11-09-88
11-09-88
Ar: _,,PAGE SUBJECT DATE
96 Large Scale Development plan for the Islamic Mosque, Collins
Haynes, Mitchell Street
96 Large Scale Development plan for McDonald's Corp., Jim Atwell,
SE corner of Hollywood & 6th Street
97 Large Scale Development plan for First Assembly of God, Sam
Witt, N of 15th Street & E of Drakes Cafe
98 Large Scale Development plan for Harp's Food Store, Newton Hailey,
W of Garland & N of Wedington Drive
100 Preliminary Plat of Melanda West Subdivision
101 Preliminary Plat of Sherwood Forest Estates - Phase 11
104 Large Scale Development Plan of Eastside Missionary
Baptist Church
Large Scale Development Plan for
Large Scale Development Plan for
Large Scale Development Plan for
Large Scale Development Plan for
Preliminary Plat of Oakland View
105
106
107
109
109
111
112
114
115
115
116
119
:120
121
123
125
127
128
132
133
134
136
138
139
140
141
142
146
148
151
153
154
155
157
157
157
y59
w:._'61
.:' :'164
168
169
Ramay Junior High School
Woodland Junior High School
Trinity Evangelical Church
Superior Industries
Subdivision
Revised Preliminary Plat of Yorktown Square, Phase 111
Final Plat of Fred Starr Estates
Large Scale Development Plan for Packaging Specialties
Replat of Final Plat of the Fayetteville Industrial Park
Final Plat of Foster Addition
Final Plat of North Hills Medical Park
Preliminary Plat Meadowridge Subdivision, Phase 111 - Replat
of Phase 11
Preliminary Plat of Heather Heights Subdivision
Final Plat of North Hills Medical Park (P.U.D.)
Final Plat of Vantage Square - Unit 2
Preliminary Plat of Hyland Park - V1
Preliminary Plat of Fiesta Park Subdivision - Phases 1,11 & 111
Large Scale Development Plan of Hill Motor Company
Large Scale Development Plan for Shuler Autohaus
Revised Preliminary Plat of Fiesta Park Subdivision
Large Scale Development Plan for R & P Electroplating
Pre Plat, Gaddy Acres Sub.
Final Plat, Fiesta Park Ph. I
LSD, Pack Rat
LSD, Abernathy Clinic
LSD, RV Park
Concept Plat, Ferguson Addition
Pre Plat, Paradise View Estates
Final Plat, Gaddy Acres Sub.
LSD, AQ Chicken
Final Plat, Spring Creek Add
LSD, Rehab Hospital - Continental Medical Systems
Final Plat, Paradise View Estates
Pre Plat, Ferguson Add.
Pre Plat, Regency Estates
Pre Plat, Spring Creek Add II
Pre Plat, Skyline Estates
LSD, CTA Industrial Project
Pre. Plat, Mr. Comfort Air Park
Pre Plat, Stonebridge Sub
Pre Plat, Emerald Subdivision Pht
F*^
12-07-88
12-07-88
12-07-88
12-07-88
04-04-89
04-04-89
04-19-89
04-19-89
04-19-89
04-19-89
05-03-89
05-03-89
05-03-89
05-03-89
05-17-89
05-17-89
05-17-89
05-17-89
06-07-89
06-07-89
06-07-89
06-21-89
06-21-89
06-21-89
06-21-89
07-19-89
07-19-89
07-19-89
8-9-89
8-9-89
8-9-89
8-9-89
8-23-89
8-23-89
10,4,,89
10-,18-89
12-.6c.89
12.6.89
12-6-89
12-6-89
2-7-90
2-7790
2.7-90
2-21-90
2-21-90
3-7-90
3-7-90
3-21-90
Page Subject Date
172 Pre Plat, Cambray Sub 3-21-90
174 Pre Plat, Park Place Ph VIII 4-4-90
1 7 Mt. Comfort Meadows
4-4-90
79 Pre Plat, Sexton Point 5-3-90
180 LSD, Procter £, Gamble 5-3-90
180 Replat of Pre Plat of Park Place Ph IV 5-3-90
181 Pre Plat, Park Place Ph V 5-3-90
183 Pre Plat, Park Place Ph VIII 5-3-90
183 LSD, Arkansas Farm $ Ranch Supply 5-3-90
184 Pre Plat, Creekside Estates 5-3-90
185 LSD, Mudd Creek Farm 5-3-90
186 Final Plat, Regency Estates 5-3-90
186 Final Plat, Fiesta Park Ph II 5-3-90
188 Final Plat, Sexton Point 5-31-90
188 Pre Plat, Pratt Woods 5-31-90
190 Final Plat, Mt. Comfort Meadows 5-31-90
191 Final Plat, Walnut Heights 6-28-90
192 Pre Plat, Green Meadows Sub 6-28-90
197 LSD, Colt Square 7-12-90
198 Final Plat, Keating Estates 7-12-90
198 Pre Plat, Waterman Woods 7-12-90
201 Pre Plat, Green Meadows Addition 7-26-90
203 Final Plat, Fiesta Park Ph. III 7-26-90
203 Final Plat, Skyline Estates 7-26-90
204 Final Plat, Stonebridge Sub. 7-26-90
204 Final Plat, Meadowridge Sub 7-26-90
206 LSD, Bio -tech Pharmacal 8-16-90
10 REVISED FINAL PLAT OF GADDY ACRES SUBDIVISION
'y BOB GADDY - S OF MISSION, .S OF WHIPPOORWILLsLANE 8-30-90
212 PRE. PLAT OF WOODVIEW HEIGHTS ADD.(FORMERLY OAK HILL SUB.).
GEORGE FAUCETTE - S OF SYCAMORE, OF GREGG AVE. 8-30-90
214 PRE. PLAT OF COTNER SUBDIVISION
WARREN COTNER - W OF HWY 112, N HWY 71 BYPASS 8-30-90
217 PRE. PLAT OF EDGE HILL SUBIVISION
MARK FOSTER @ BUDDY PEOPLES - S OF RAVENSWOOD, W OF COUNTRY CLUB DR. 8-30-90
218 REPLAT OF FINAL PLAT OF PARK PLACE ADDITION- PHASE KV
JIM LNDSEY - OFF CAMBRIDGE, S OF MISSION BLVD 8-30-90
219 LARGE SCALE DELOPMENT PLAN FOR OFFICE -WAREHOUSE
ARKANSAS BOOK SERVICE - E OF SHILOH, S OF MT. COMFORT RD. 8-30-90
220 FINAL PLAT OF THOMAS ADDITION ( FORMERLY J. P. KENNEDY ESTS
AND KEATING ESTS WEST)
RICHARD KEATING - N OF TOWNSHIP, OF OLD WIRE RD. 8-30-90
221 L arge scale development plan for self -storage units
DENNIS P DALE CAUDLE - OF RUPPLE RD, N OF WEDINGTON DR. 9-27-90
222 Large cale development plan for parking lot addition
TYSON'S FOOD, INC - 2700 SOUTH SCHOOL AVE. 9-27-90
224 LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAY. HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION
FAY. SCHOOL ADMINISTRAZION - 1001 STONE ST. 9-27-90
226 PRE. PLAT OF NORTH POINT SUBDIVISION
MCILROY BANK AND TRUST - N OF HALL AVE. , E OF HWY 71 BYPASS 11-11-90
228 P:;E.PLAT OF AARON SUBDIVISION
DUB DUNAWAY - N OF HUNTSVILLE RD, W OF CHERRY LA 11-11-90
4,230 PRE..PLAT OF DOUBLE SPRINGS ESTATES
STEVE $ DONNA COMBS - S OF HWY 16 WEST, OF DOUBLE SPS RD 11-25-90
230 LEVERTT TERRACE TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT
BOB WHITFIELD - E OF LEVERETT, N OF POPLAR, $.W OF CHESTNUT 11-25-90
Page Subject
411:33 LARGE SCALE DEV. PLAN FON UNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCH
GRAY CARNAHAN - 315 WEST :`MAPLE AVE. 11-15-90
234 LARGE SCALE DEV. PLAN FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE
PAT PINNELL - S OF 6TH ST. E OF BEECHWOOD AVE. 11-15-90
235 PRE. PLAT OF BROOKHOLLOW - PHASE III
JERRY SWEETSER N OF JOYCE ST, W OF OLD MISSOURI RD. 11-15-90
237 PRE. PLAT OF ZION PLACE SUBDIVISION
JOHN LARGENT - OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS ( W. C. 87 ) 11-29-90
239 FINAL PLAT OF AARON SUBDIVISION
DUB DUNAWAY - NW CORNER OF HUNTVILLE F CHERRY 11-29-90
239 FINAL PLAT OF DOUBLE SPRINGS ESTATES
STEVE $ DOINA COMBS - W OF DOUBLE SPS P.D, S OF WEDINGTON DR. 11-29-90
239 P.RE'. PLAT OF DOUBLETREE ESTATES
LESLIE HOWELL - MT COMFORT RD. ( W. C. 84 ) 11-29-90