HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-11-27 - Minutes•
•
•
MINUTES OF A SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEETING
A meeting of the Subdivision Committee of the City Planning Commission
was held on Monday, November 27, 1978, at 4:15 P.M., in the Board of Directors
Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ernest Jacks, Newton Hailey, Keith Newhouse, Bill
Kisor and Larry Wood.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
•
None.
Bobbie Jones, Gail Biswell, Charles Combs, J. B. Hays,
Johnie Bassett, Ervan Wimberly, Harry Gray, Jim Witt, Tom
Robinson, Janet McMullen, and other unidentified members
of the audience.
Chairman Jacks called the meeting to order.
Keith Newhouse moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting of November 13, 1978, as
mailed. Newton Hailey seconded the motion, which
passed unanimously.
The first item for discussion was the
Large Scale Development (LSD) plan of Charles
Combs for construction of a cabaret North of
15th Street and East of Morningside Drive.
Charles Combs was present to represent.
Newton Hailey questioned whether this Committee could consider this
LSD since it was actually a Conditional Use which would have to be approved
by the Planning Commission. After discussion betweenthe members, Bill Kisor
stated that the proposed LSD could and should be discussed since it had al-
ready been scheduled, the developer was present, and notification had already
been made that it would be heard.
Chairman Jacks opened the discussion by stating that the Plat Review
Committee had questioned the availability of sewer to the property and had
disapproved of the size of the proposed sign. Bobbie Jones replied that she
had read the sign wrong and that the proposed sign would meet requirements.
Charles Combs stated that he had talked with the City Engineer regard-
ing the sewer problem and that an engineer would have to decide whether there
would be sufficient fall for sewer. He stated that Steve Cummings had given
him an easement to connect on to the Shenandoah Mobile Home Park's sewer, if
necessary.
Bobbie Jones stated that gas was not available on the property, the
closest gas line being East of Shenandoah Mobile Home Park. However, she
added, the gas problem was not nearly as critical to development as the sewer
was since gas service does not depend upon the grade of the land.
Bill Kisor moved to recommend approval of the LSD to the Planning Com-
mission contingent upon (1) the Conditional Use being approved, and (2) the
sewer service being worked out to the CityEngineer's satisfaction.
Keith Newhouse seconded the motion, which passed 3-1 with Newton
Hailey casting the "nay" vote.
•
MINUTES
CHARLES COMBS
Large Scale Development
North of 15th St. and
East of Morningside Drive
X20
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Meeting
November 27, 1978
The next item for discussion was the EASTWOOD ESTATES
preliminary plat of Eastwood Estates, lo- Preliminary Plat
cated on Crossover Road between Hwy. 45 and Crossover Road
Manor Drive, property zoned R-1, Low Density
Residential District. J. B. Hays, Johnie
Bassett and Ervan Wimberly were present to
represent.
Chairman Jacks stated that the Plat Review Committee had recommended
dedication of an additional 10 feet off of the West side of Hwy. 265 in order
to bring the right-of-way up to master street plan standards.
Ervan Wimberly commented that the gas company has a 50 feet easement
along Crossover Road and has two large high pressure lines (8" and 10") lo-
cated in that easement. He stated that if his developers deeded the extra
right-of-way and then sometime in the future the highway department decided
to widen Crossover Road, the gas company would have to remove and relocate
these lines at its own expense.
J. B. Hays explained that he and Johnie Bassett, as developers, had
no objections to giving the extra 10 feet easement.
Chairman Jacks stated that the only other real problem with the plat
was the layout of the lots, which included a long tandem approach to the 3
back lots (6, 7, and 8). He stated that the Plat Review Committee had sev-
eral comments concerning the layout, i.e., Larry Wood and Clayton Powell
felt public street dedications should be made for north -south and east -west
access roads; the City Engineer's office was concerned about availability of
sewer; and the utility companies had asked for 10 or 11 easements. He stated
that the proposed layout of the lots practically eliminated future development
of any of the lots and would shut out the possibility of ever getting any
public access through the lots.
Mr Jacks asked Bobbie Jones whether she had received the signatures
of the adjoining property owners and she stated that she had not. Mr. Jacks
then said that it was the policy of this Committee to not approve any plat
without the signatures Ervan Wimberly replied that practically all of the
signatures had been obtained and that his associate, Harry Gray, was out try-
ing to get the rest of the signatures at that very moment.
Mr. Jacks then stated that they could not approve the plat without
the signatures, but they could review the general layout in order for the
developers to understand the Committee'sfeelings on the matter.
Mr. Jacks stated that the Tandem Lot Ordinance had been designed for
land areas which had topographical problems to overcome, but that he didn't
think this development really fit the tandem lot intent. He questioned
whether the proposed development would leave any of the surrounding land
owners landlocked. Ervan Wimberly replied that it would not. Mr. Wimberly
then pointed out the site of this tract of land in relation to the surrounding
area on a large map on.the boardroom wall.
J. B. Hays commented that several professional people were interested
in these large lots and understood that septic tanks would probably be neces-
sary on the•3 back lots. He stated that sewer service could be obtained for
the front lots if the houses were placed near enough to Crossover Road.
c
tai
• Subdivision Committee Meeting
November 27, 1978 - 3
•
Jim Witt, a neighboring land owner present in support of the proposal,
stated that he and another neighboring land owner who was unable to be present
at the meeting (Bruce Armstrong), both were interested in seeing this land
developed as proposed since it would be in keeping with the rest of the de-
velopment in the area. He stated that he and Mr. Armstrong both had large
lots and would like to see other large lots developed around them instead of
small lots with many houses.
J. B. Hays commented that he presently had six people interested in
buying these lots and that he himself had spent $4,000 to $5,000 surfacing
the private drive which would be the access for the back lots. He said there
was a real demand for large lots where people could have room for a large
yard or small pasture for a pony for their kids, etc.
Keith Newhouse inquired the length of the proposed private drive and
Dr. Hays responded that it was 1,320 feet.
Larry Wood, Planning Consultant, stated that the comments he had made
at the Plat Review Meeting still held true and that he felt that development
as proposed would close off any further north -south movement from Highway 45
south.
Dr. Hays questioned whether the north -south access was really needed
and Chairman Jacks replied that, although the Committee could not foresee
anything for certain, it did not have anything to insure that the lots would
never again be divided and that the area would never need city streets.
Mr. Jacks asked if the developers were contending that the whole area
would never need any city streets and Mr. Wimberly replied that this was the
question which the developers were asking of this Committee.
Mr. Wimberly further stated that he did not feel the developers should
be required to dedicate public street rights-of-way for streets that might
never be needed. He said that if the lots were ever again divided, he felt
the city could require street dedication at that time. He said that it would
be more feasible to build public streets if there were to be many lots, but
to require the developers to go to the expense for streets for such a few
lots would be unfair.
Bobbie Jones stated that the fire inspector was concerned about the
distance to the back lots and whether or not fire hydrants would be available.
Chairman Jacks stated that he could see both sides to the proposal,
and that he felt this Committee should take this on to the Planning Commissiot
without a recommendation.
Ervan Wimberly suggested that the developers could make a contract
with the city giving it the rights-of-way dedications and putting clauses in
the deeds of the buyers of the lots that the buyers would agree to build the
streets at the city's call. Dr. Hays responded that he would rather not en-
cumber the buyers in this manner, if at all possible.
Harry Gray announced that he had just been out trying to obtain the
last of the property owner signatures and that he had obtained all except three.
Keith Newhouse moved to take this plat on to the Planning Commission
without a recommendation.
Newton Hailey seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
Subdivision Committee Meeting
November 27, 1978 4
The next item for discussion was the
proposed improvements for Sunset Woods by
the Property Owners' Association. Sunset
Woods is located south of North Street, West
of Sunset Avenue, and North of Cleveland
Street. Ervan Wimberly was present to represent.
Ervan Wimberly commented that he did not understand why these im-
provements needed to come back to the Subdivision Committee since they had
been covered previously under the Planned Unit Development plat.
Chairman Jacks explained that these improvements, although shown as
proposed on the PUD plat, had not been definitely and specifically drawn so
as to show exactly how they would be developed. Mr. Jacks also stated that
the utility companies had asked for certain easements at the Plat Review
meeting and Mr. Wimberly replied that the easements asked for would be on
the plat.
Tom Robinson, present as an interested party, stated that he had two
comments, to make on the proposal: (1) The original plat had shown Lewis
Lane and Oak Lane as connecting and that there had been opposition to allow-
ing through traffic, however, the access drive which would connect the two
streets on this plat does "de facto" practically the same thing; (2) He was
personally concerned that the area would be cleared off considerably in order
to build the pool and courts and that he felt this should not be done, but
that the pool and courts should be nestled into as many trees as possible in
order to leave the surroundings as natural as possible.
Ervan Wimberly responded that a barricade would be built across the
two ends of the access drive which would be removed only in cases of emergency.
He said this was proposed on the plat since there had been opposition to al-
lowing through traffic. He also stated that it was the object and intent of
the developer to save as many trees as possible and that the clearing for im-
provements was complete and no more of the trees would need to be removed.
Bill Kisor moved to approve the proposal subject to (1) easements asked
for at the Plat Review meeting be added, and (2) a barrier to prevent through
traffic be constructed across the access drive.
Janet McMullen, an adjoining property owner, stated that she also was
concerned that the area would be stripped and wanted to know if there was any
requirement the Committee could make to prevent the developer from removing
any more of the trees. Chairman Jacks replied that the City Attorney had ad-
vised this Committee in the past they they could not make such a requirement.
Ms. McMullen stated further stat Claud Prewitt had stated that the trees
would be saved, but several of them had already been destroyed.
Ervan Wimberly again stated that the clearing was finished and no more
of the trees would need removal.
Keith Newhouse seconded Bill Kisor motion to approve, subject to the two
contingencies stated above, which passed unanimously.
SUNSET WOODS
Proposed Improvements
By Property Owners' Assoc.
The last item for discussion was the
feasibility sketch for a replat of a PUD by
Comley Finer Homes on Lots 1-20, Johnson
Road Addition. Ervan Wimberly was present to
represent.
COMLEY FINER HOMES
Feasibility Sketch
Johnson Road Addition
•
•
•
Subdivision Committee Meeting
November 27, 1978 5
Chairman Jacks stated that the meeting had run over into the time
which the Planning Commission meeting was scheduled to begin and that for
the sake of brevity and redundancy, he suggested that this item be held off
and discussed only at the Planning Commission meeting which would follow
immediately.
There being no dissention to this suggestion, the meeting was
adjourned at 5:05 p.m.