HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-02-17 Minutes•
A special
17, 1993,
Building,
PRESENT:
MINUTES OF A POLICE PENSION BOARD MEETING
meeting of the Police Pension Board was held on February
at 10:10 a.m. in Room 326 of the City Administration
113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Eldon Roberts, Jerry Friend, Rick Hoyt, Hollis Spencer,
Dr. James Mashburn, Mayor Fred Hanna, City Clerk Sherry
Thomas, City Attorney Jerry Rose, and Administrative
Services Director Ben Mayes.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hanna called the meeting to order stating the purpose of this
special meeting is to discuss the retirement requests of Charles F.
Johnson and Mary Mueller.
RETIREMENT REOUESTS: CHARLES F. JOHNSON & MARY MUELLER
Eldon Roberts stated Charles F. Johnson has been with the
department for about 14-15 years, and Mary Mueller has been with
the department for about 15-16 years. He stated this board has
acted on disability requests in the past. However, these two are
different in that they are requesting line of duty disability
retirement which would mean they would receive 65% of their salary
instead of 50%. He stated there were several people watching to
see how the Board would handle these disability retirement
requests. He stated these requests should be looked at thoroughly
because of the potential adverse affects they could have on the
pension fund soundness.
Roberts stated Johnson had submitted his application and two
letters from his doctor, dated January 8 and February 11, about a
knuckle injury that has arthritis in it and prevents him from
firing his hand gun.
Mueller has submitted with her application a letter from her
doctor, Kirk Johnson, stating her injury was sustained on September
25, 1992, during a fire arms qualification.
Spencer asked if these officers reported their injuries to the
department.
Roberts stated there was something brought to the department's
attention about Johnson injuring his hand when striking someone he
was arresting. The department was aware of Mueller's injury during
the firing qualification.
Mayor Hanna asked if there wasn't some job on the police force for
Johnson even though he may have arthritis in his finger.
Roberts stated the doctor is saying he can no longer handle a hand
gun. This may be a problem.
•
•
•
February 17, 1993
Dr. Mashburn asked if anyone had observed him during the quarterly
firing qualifications to determine if he was having difficulty
shooting or if his scores had dropped.
Hoyt stated Johnson is a shooting instructor.
Mayor Hanna stated he felt the laws should be changed regarding
this type of disability retirement.
Roberts stated if this disability retirement is allowed, this would
make Johnson the highest paid retiree, even more than the last
retiring chief of police.
Hoyt stated the Board has the right to require Johnson to get an
opinion from another doctor.
Mayor Hanna stated the Board's intention was not to deny a
disability retirement to any real injury.
Spencer stated Frank Upton retired because he was shot in the hand.
He asked what percentage of his salary he is drawing.
Roberts stated he is getting 50%, but this 65% disability
retirement is a new law. He stated he agreed with Mayor Hanna,
because he is sure Johnson will be getting another job. The intent
of this new law was to help out someone that was totally and
permanently disabled in a line of duty injury.
Friend asked in the statute it stated a disease can be a reason for
a line of duty disability retirement. He asked Jerry Rose what the
definition of disease was according to the statute.
Rose stated according to the statute, a disease would not have to
be caused by the police department operation, but aggravate the
disease. He stated there is no causation required by the statute.
He stated the Board need only be reasonable in their decision
making process. If the Board rules against the retirement request,
the officer has the option to appeal to the court. The Court has
a de novo review of the case; i.e., they take a fresh look at the
case and make a decision rather than reviewing the decision that
was made by the Pension Board as being arbitrary and capricious.
Hoyt stated he felt the Board should first decide if the injury
makes the person disabled to do police work. Then, the second
thing the Board should consider is was the injury a line of duty
injury. He feels Mueller could probably come up with several
reasons for disability. He thinks she has emphysema. He knows she
was hurt on the firing range, and she has been off work since the
accident on September 25, 1992. She has been going to the doctor
for treatments.
•
•
February 17, 1993
Dr. Mashburn stated if the Board wants, he will read the letters
from the doctors, and they can discuss the medical meanings of the
injuries.
Dr. Mashburn read the letter about Charles Johnson. The doctor
stated Johnson could not come back to police work as he knows it
because of the inflammation and degenerative joint disease in his
finger. Dr. Mashburn stated an injury to a joint does not always
result in arthritis. He could have developed the arthritis anyway
without an injury. There is no evidence the injury had any bearing
on the arthritis. In addition, there is nothing in the letter
stating anything about the original injury. Johnson also needs to
establish the injury is duty related. There is nothing in the
letter that states the disability is permanent. Arthritis tends to
come and go. There should be some statement of gradient or degree
of disability. He felt the Board needs another opinion regarding
the permanency of the disability. He felt there was inadequate
information at this time for the Board to be able to make a ruling.
Dr. Mashburn, seconded by Spencer, made a motion to make no
decision about the retirement at this time until additional
information is provided to the Board. The motion passed by a
unanimous vote.
Friend asked if the Board could find out about any other type of
• injuries, i.e., sports related, falling, etc., that might have
caused the injury to his finger rather than a duty related
accident.
Dr. Mashburn asked if anyone had observed Johnson while he was
shooting to notice if he was having difficulty or if his scores had
dropped.
Dr. Mashburn read the letter from Mary Mueller's doctor. Her
doctor, Kirk Johnson, stated Mueller had a shoulder injury with an
acute sprain and strain with degenerative joint disease. He stated
19% of her whole person was disabled as result of these injuries.
Dr. Mashburn stated many of these types of injuries can be improved
by surgery. Kirk Johnson is a chiropractor and cannot perform
surgery. There is a limitation for the amount of care a
chiropractor can provide a patient. Dr. Mashburn recommended
Mueller be examined by an orthopedic physician.
Dr. Mashburn stated he would like to hear testimony from fellow
officers that work with these people. He does realize the "buddy
system" exists, and this could prove to be difficult.
Dr. Mashburn stated both of these people are stating they have
degenerative bone disease. He stated this was a part of the aging
process.
•
February 17, 1993
Friend stated football players, etc., are operated on and return to
playing. He asked if they have more problems later on.
Dr. Mashburn stated if the injury is to a ligament, most of the
time they are repaired, and there are no further problems. If it
is a joint injury, they may get arthritis. But, many people get
arthritis without having any injuries.
Dr. Mashburn asked if there was an annual evaluation performed on
each officer about their physical performance. He stated this
might be considered in the near future, especially in the light of
these types of retirement requests.
Dr. Mashburn stated he wanted people to be fairly treated, and the
basis of determining a disability should be based on medical facts
and not whether or not the fund could afford the claim.
Dr. Mashburn, seconded by Hoyt, made a motion to delay a decision
on the retirement request until a second opinion is obtained by an
orthopedic surgeon, a medical doctor, for Ms. Mueller. The motion
passed by a unanimous vote.
Dr. Mashburn stated the law needs to be changed to take into
account the degree of disability, perhaps similar to the way
worker's compensation benefits are assessed.
Spencer stated these letters put the police department on the spot
when they say the people are unable to continue their jobs. If
they do go back to work and a problem comes up, the police
department could be held liable.
Roberts stated the law states "permanent" disability. If the
doctor states the injury is not permanent but can only be corrected
through surgery and the person opts not to have surgery, then what
is the recourse for the Pension Board.
City Attorney Rose stated that is a decision the Pension Board
would have to make.
Dr. Mashburn stated there is treatment available for arthritis.
City Clerk Thomas stated she would prepare the letters to Johnson
and Mueller requesting the information the Board needs.
Hoyt stated he feels the principle questions should be if in fact
the officers are disabled.
Dr. Mashburn stated the connection between what is being alleged
and the injury first needs to be made evident.
• Friend asked how likely it was for a physician to state the
disabilities are a result of the injuries.
•
1
February 17, 1993
Dr. Mashburn stated he would hate to say that a specific injury
caused the arthritis because arthritis can set in without any
injury.
Roberts stated Mueller had offered to retire at the 50% level until
this new law was brought to her attention. Sgt. Johnson stated he
would retire at the 50% level as well.
Roberts stated the Board will also have to consider whether these
people are eligible for a medical retirement at the 50% level.
CASH FLOW CHARTS
Ben Mayes presented the Board members with copies of cash flow
predictions for 1993. The Board talked about keeping between
$80,000 and $100,000 in cash to make benefit payments. He will
have Mike Kirkland send Elaine Longer any amount over the $100,000
for her to invest.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 11:01 a.m.