HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-12-29 Minutes•
•
•
MINUTES OF A PLAT REVIEW MEETING
A meeting of the Fayetteville Plat Review Committee was held on Thursday,
December 29, 1988 in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 West
Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES• Jim Crownover, Rick Evans, and Tom McElroy
CITY REPRESENTATIVES• Don Bunn, Mickey Jackson, Perry Franklin and
Elaine Cattaneo
OTHERS PRESENT: David Ferguson
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FERGUSON CONSTRUCTION OFFICES
DAVID FERGUSON - NE CORNER OF STONE BRIDGE RD & HUNTSVILLE RD
The only item of consideration was a Large Scale Development Plan for Ferguson
Construction Offices submitted by David Ferguson. Property located on the
northeast corner of Stone Bridge Road and Huntsville Road and zoned C-2,
Thoroughfare Commercial.
JIM CROWNOVER - OZARK ELECTRIC
Have power service available. He asked if he proposes•to develop.the_other.
property a little later. Mr. Ferguson stated that they don't have anything in
mind right now, but there is a possibility. Crownover stated that they ought to
provide some easements for power to the buildings somewhere on the property, but
he is sure where would be best right now. Maybe have an easement down the north
property line and bring in service from the east. Most likely the best way for
them to come would be from Stone Bridge Road so they would like a 25' easement
dedicated across the western piece of property along the north property line.
RICK EVANS - ARKANSAS WESTERN GAS COMPANY
Stated that he would be like to go the same route as the power company and would
need a 20' easement along the east and the north side and along the road.
Service is available.
TOM MCELROY - SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE
Stated that a 20' easement across the front, on the east property line and on the
north property line would be sufficient. He asked how many telephone lines they
would want. Mr. Ferguson stated that they would want 2 lines for the
construction office and probably 3 lines for the Auto Parts next door.
•
•
•
Plat Review
December 29, 1988
Page 2
MICKEY JACKSON - FIRE CHIEF
Stated that they have no problem with this, it looks o.k. What kind of
construction are they planning to use. Mr. Ferguson stated that it would be
structural steel with an 8" firewall between each building separating the service
from the retail.
PERRY FRANKLIN - TRAFFIC SUPERINTENDENT
Stated that he needs to make sure that they don't obstruct the view of the
entrances and exits with greenery, etc. Everything need to be kept less than 2
1/2' tall. If it is questionable that they might have sight problems the way it
is planned, he needs to get a copy of the ordinance from the Planning Office that
is on page 866.1 in the Code of Ordinances and clear it through that office. He
stated that his office does have some "Buckle Up" seatbelt signs that they will
let him have for a minimal cost.
DON BUNN - CITY ENGINEER
Stated that this scale is 1" = 50' rather than 1" = 25'. He commented that the
Sanitation Superintendent didn't like the location of this dumpster because they
would have to be backing out of it. He would prefer a_.location-.in the front
toward the west side which may take some of those parking spaces because they
can't have the dumpster blocked. He suggested that Mr. Ferguson contact Mr. Brt
and see what they can work out.
Bunn stated that the water is in the front and they maybe should consider running
a main line through there if they are ever going to think about selling these two
tracts separately. That drainage through there may give them a problem however.
He noted that he won't require this since it is all his property right now, but
he would suggest that he take a look at having that a main line up to west
property line of this project to eliminate potential problems in the future.
Therefore, they would need at least a 25' easement there. If it is going to be a
private water line, it can't be in the dedicated easement there.
Bunn stated that they need to submit revised plats by late Friday with the
changes discussed shown on it. Also, they would like to have a copy of the
State Highway's approval of the driveway location.
Bunn stated that there is a requirement to screen between R-1 zoning which is
north of this and C-2 when it is adjacent, but may not be required between A-1
which is on the east of this and C-2. He needs to check with the Planning Office
to see what is required. If it is wooded, then that will suffice. However, at
some time in the future when something is done there, they will be required to
put screening which could be vegetation or a fence. Mr. Ferguson asked if this
screening is required even if the adjacent property belongs to them also. Bunn
answered, yes, there is no distinction between ownerships. Although, they might
be able to get a variance from this.
•
•
•
Plat Review
December 29, 1988
Page 3
Bunn stated that this will go to the Subdivision Committee on the 4th of January
at 10:30 in this room and to the Planning Commission on the 9th of January at
5:00 p.m.
ELAINE CATTANEO - CITY PLANNING SECRETARY
Advised that Mr. Ferguson needs to contact Jim Johnson, Water Representative, to
give him more information before addresses can be assigned to this.