HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-01-12 MinutesMINUTES OF A PLAT REVIEW MEETING
A meeting of the Plat Review Committee was held on January 12,
1984 at 9:00 a.m. at the F.ayetteville'Chamber of Commerce.
UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Kenneth Wagner, Connie
Skinner, L. 0. Ferguson, Jim
Crownover.
CITY REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Clayton Powell, Bobbie
Jones and Jeanette Crumpler.
OTHERS PRESENT: Mel Milholland and Wade
Bishop.
At this time, Mr. Milholland YORKTOWN SQUARE SUBDIVISION
presented his plans for the WADE BISHOP
proposal of development for Yorktown Square Subdivision.
Milholland stated that this was a 26 acre tract, R-1,
Single family residential. On Stubblefield Road, Milholland
advised that he thought that an additional 25' from centerline
to existing right-of-way would need to be dedicated, thus
an additional 5' dedication. This would bring this up to
the City Standards. Milholland advised that lots 1-7, Block
1 would face Stubblefield Road. The entrance is approximately
90' between centerlines of Loxley and the subdivision
entrance and they are requesting a waiver for that offset
of which the ordinance calls for 150'. Milholland advised
this is listed in the Waivers Requested. Milholland advised
that Wedgewood deadends on the North end into the David
Wilson property as required by an agreement between David
Wilson and the seller of the property. Powell asked that
this statement be reiterated, and Milholland advised that
this was an agreement in that there would be a 50' right-of-way
into the property. Milholland advised there was no determination
as to where this 50' would be located. Milholland advised
there was an access left to the east as this is prime
property for an R-1 development. Milholland stated there
was a high-pressure gas line on the south end and also there
is a 50' easement on the east for Ozark Electric. Milholland
stated that they would like anwaiver of the street light
spacing to that which is shown on the plat. Milholland
advised there are aofew lots which are less than 70',
same of which are also listed on the plat. Milholland
advised that at lots 26 & 27, Block 1, there may be a sewer
pum station required. This matter has been discussed with City
Engineer, Don Bunn. There would be one tandem lot.
Milholland asked if there was a requirement for Green Space.
Jones advised that this was currently before the Planning
Commission and would go before the Board of Directors. Once
the Amendment passes through the Board, it is a requirement, but
an opinion would have to be rendered by the City Attorney regarding
this development.
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE TWO
JANUARY 12, 1984
Milholland advised that the developer intends to develop in
phases, Phase I and Phase II, and plans to start immediately.
1) Clayton Powell (City Street Superintendent):
Powell advised that the plat book reflects 50' of right-of=way
for Stubblefield Road existing, but the old rights-of-way
need to have some sort of"instrument for dedicating the 25' north
o ff the centerling abutting the Subdivision. Powell advised that
when Summerhill was developed, they extended storm drainage on
the existing right-of-way across the front (south) of part of the
tract. At the intersection of Stubblefield Road and Wedgewood
Drive, at the Boulevard entrance reflects drainage going from
the west side of the street to the east. Due to the drainage
problems in the area and especially to the west, at the curve of
Stubblefield Road where it intersects Harold Street, the water
needs to drain to the East and this is the reason for the Summerhill
Developer draining to the east across the front of the property.
Powell advised that was reinforced concrete pipe, Class II
to meet the current specifications and can be reused. Powell
stated that the street specifications are in the process of
being revised and french draining of suspect areas of subterranian
drainage, wet weather springs and so forth will be a prime con-
sideration because of the premature failure of some streets that
have been dedicated less than three years. The City cannot
afford to go out and rebuild these streets this frequently. Powell
stated that he recommended they conform to the proposed revisions
of the street specifications. Powell advised he did not expect
any drastic changes in the base material, sub -base preparation or
the 2" asphalt, but what the final outcome will be, he could not
advise. Another consideration, however, is the developer warranty
w ill be strictly enforced hereafter. In the past, Powell advised
that a Contractor's warranty has been used for the developer
to meet this requirement because of the premature failures. The
length of time may be extended from one (1) year to three (3)
o r five (5) years. Powell advised that this new program was
currently in the plans and expected it would be in effect very
shortly. Powell advised that he thought a bond would be required by
the developer.
Specific offsite improvements: it is necessary for the full
length of the subdivision abutting Stubblefield Road to be storm -
drained, designed and engineered to drain to the east
where there is an outlet. Widen Stubblefield Road from the
centerline of the right-of-way, 15.5 feet to the back
o f the curb, make that from west property line to east property
line and then transition on existing right-of-way back to
the Summerhill curbing with gradual transition rather than abrupt right
2
P LAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE THREE
JANUARY 12, 1984
angles with the same being done with the existing pavement
on the east side. Powell advised that the water is ponding
at the intersection of Bertha and to the west of Summerhill
Drive and ponds at the curb at Harold Street intersection.
There is no outlet there and surface water must be designed
to go back to the east. With regard to the street currently
proposedhas Cambridge Street, this should either be totally
constructed or totally aborted in Phase I. Also, even though
there is an agreement between property owners to have a right-of-way
dedicated, we should have the cul-de-sac at the east end of that
street. It would not have to abut the property line, but dedicate
the 50' to the east property line, and if the street is ever extended
according to City Code, the excess right-of-way dedicated to construct
the cul-de-sac would go back to the abutting property owners
of Lot 1 and Lot 8. There are so many short deadend streets
currently causing problems for not only public vehicles such
as sanitation, but are creating so many problems around
town that the cul-de-sacs are needed. Milholland asked
if this street could be constructed in Phase II. Powell
stated that would leave Lots 1 and 2 of Block 4, without access and if
this would be the case, a commitment would be needed that
this would be done if Stage II should never be developed,
that the developer would come back and finish.
Powell then questioned the combined Utility and Drainage
easements which are shown. He stated this needs to try
to be avoided if at all possible.
Powell stated that in the street design, the topography
is going to change to meet the drainage requirements,
but he would like to point out that the drainage ditch at lots
25, 26, 27 and soforth. There is so much problem with
builders going in in a brand new subdivision and changing the
topography by about a foot to keep the houses he built from flooding
after he built them too low and after the fact, they wanted to
dedicate an unimproved drainage easement which is not acceptable.
Powell- advised he would like for the drainage easement to go
all the way to the rear property line and be taken all the
way to the north perimeter of the subdivision in improved
d rainage easements such as concrete -lined ditches or storm
d rainage. Powell advised that he was recently visited by
a representative of a plastic pipe company, which is less
expensive than concrete pipe or corregated metal pipe;
where there is no weight bearing surfaces, Powell stated
that a material of this nature would be acceptable.
Powell expressed concern over the sizes of lots 8, 9,
10, and 14, 15, 16, the lot size becomes so narrow, such
as Lot 15 only has 35 feet. He suggested, since it would
be practically impossible to meet the 12.5 driveway safety zone from
property line and the other safety zones, that possibly
these lots could have tandem (joint) driveways in order that they
3
•
•
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE FOUR
JANUARY 12, 1984
could meet the driveway safety zone. Jones advised that the
drives could be handled in this manner or they could ask
the Planning Commission for a waiver in advance and designate
the specific location of the driveways on the covenants. Jones
explained that the code allows for a joint driveway without
waiver, otherwise, a waiver would be required. Powell advised
that on a tandem driveway, he would allow up to 40' as if it were
a commercial or multi=family dwelling. Powell advised that his
last comment about drainage at this time is to be sure that
positive outflow is present from Phase I until Phase II is
constructed to keep water from ponding, backing up on the
street, etc.
Powell advised 'he wowld.address the main entrance threshold of
Wedgewood and Stubblefield as far as the intersection offset from
Loxley Avenue. Powell stated he thought this was the most reasonable
alternative on the 150 foot offset unless the entire sub-
division were reversed to have the entrance over to the
west side instead of the east side. Powell stated he
did not believe there would be that much of a traffic
problem. Milholland advised that Mr. Bishop would have
lost two lots if this subdivision had been reversed. Powell
stated he did not see any problem except the formality of
granting the variance. Powell stated that the City would
need a covenant that the property owners would maintain the
median area. Powell advised the median could be concreted
or asphalt -cement concrete or landscaped and be maintained
to the property owner's specififications.
Powell advised that he did not address the matter of maximum
length of a deadend street because of the circular patterns
of the streets.
Wade Bishop asked Mr. Powell to explain the Maintenance
bond which is proposed. Bishop asked "If you are covered for
the full construction cost, isn't that excessive". Powell
stated that up front, that is excessive, he would have to agree,
but that is what is required by code, and Powell advised that
this was a matter to be taken up with the Planning Commission
and Board of Directors.
Milholland stated he had found no standards for construction
of the median, and asked if there was any standard that was
set. Powell advised there had been a problem with this in
the past, and Hyland Park had to go back and take out some
of their median to make it safer, and would leave this up to
the developer.
•
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE FIVE
JANUARY 12, 1984
2) David McWethy (Assistant City Manager):
David McWethy was not present, however, his comments were
presented by Bobbie Jones. She advised that McWethy has
suggested that all street lights shown be placed, plus three
(3) additional street lights. She advised that one should
be placed on the property line between lots 17 and 18
of block 4. In addition, he has recommend a street light
between the lot lines of 14 and 15, block 3 and between
lots 9 and 10 of block 1. Jones advised that the Planning
Commission may require one at the end of the east street
because there is a 250 foot spacing there. Jones advised
Milholland that he may wish to have these street lights
redone and send this back through McWethy for his review.
Jones advised that after it is approved by McWethy, that
it will need to come back to her.
3) Don Bunn, (City Engineer):
Don Bunn was not present, but had the following comments:
Bunn advised that the size of the water lines needed will
have to be clarified. Easements appear to be adequate.
4) Perry Franklin (Traffic Superintendent):
Perry Franklin was not present, however, Jones advised that
Franklin had commented that there was only one way into
these 85 lots, that it would be good if there were some
way to tie back into Masonic Drive.
5) Freeman Wood (Building Inspector):
Freeman Wood was not present, but Jones advised that Wood
had commented that Yorktown Square appeared to be above
the flood plain.
6) Jim Crownover (Ozark Electric):
Crownover requested additional 15' wide easements between lots
20 and 21, block 1; between lots 12 and 13 of block 4.
Crownover advised he would go down the street right-of-way
to reach street lights since the street lights are City property.
For the location of the lights being between 18 and 19, block 4;
between 17 & 18 of block 1 and between 10 and 11 of block 1, there
would have to be some easements granted. Crownover advised
that the minimum width of these easements would be 15'.
Crownover advised there were many places for street crossings,
with the crossings having to be in galvanized pipe. Crownover
advised that poles will be put at alternate lot lines
and the service can be taken underground off of the poles
to the houses. All meters will be on the houses. Crownover
advised that digging the trench, select backfill, transport
•
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE SIX
JANUARY 12, 1984
pads and wires from the lot lines to the house would be at
the expense of the developer, Crownover advised that
Ozark Electric will put the transformer in and get the power
to the lot. Bishop asked what select fill would be used
for. Crownover advised that if the soil were to be rocky,
they would have to use sand bedding around the wires.
Bishop asked if PVC would be acceptable. Crownover advised
it would not. Crownover advised that under the street,
the requirement would be 22" galvanized pipe. Crownover
advised that service to Lot 15, block 3 would come from
the south between lots 1 and 2 and PVC could be used under
that driveway. Crownover advised that it was disturbing
to him that everyplace he looked, there appeared to be sanitary
sewer which he thought was going to lead to problems.
Crownover stated there would be no problem with other utilities using
the 50' easement along the east side of the property,
however, questioned whether or not there was in fact a 50'
easement.
Jones advised that lot 15, block 3 will need to be approved
by the Planning Commission.as a tandem lot, but will have 20'
setbacks from all property lines.
7) Connie Skinner, (Southwestern Bell):
Skinner stated that she would request 3" PVC across Wedgewood,
in the location where the easement goes between lot 24
block 1 and lot 11, block 5, as well as 5' beyond the proposed
construction.of the street. Also across the street, between
lots 5 & 6, block 2. Skinner stated she was in agreement with
the decision about the easements as requested by Kenneth Wagner.
8) Kenneth Wagner, (Arkansas Western Gas):
Wagner stated that across the back lot lines in Block 1, South
side of Winfield, north side of Stubblefield, he would like
to have 30' utility easement there with the sanitary sewer in it.
Milholland reiterated that block 3, back side, lots 1-13
would need a 30' easement; as well as back lot lines of
lots 1-7 of block 4 out to the street. Wagner stated this
was to be carried on up to block 5. All the easements in
Block 5 need to be 30' wide.
Jones interjected that Milholland may wish to make lots
4 and 5 of block 5 a little bit narrower and make lots 1
& 8 wider.
On lots 12 & 13.of block 4, a 20' easement would be requested.
Crownover advised that where the gas and electric company are
concerned, it is almost imperative to have at least 20' of
6
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE SEVEN
JANUARY 12, 1983
easement is needed. If 10' can be arranged off the other property,
this would be fine. Wagner advised that when the road is made
tc grade, the Gas Company would like a road crossing in between
lots 5 and 6, block 2 to the west across Wedgewood Drive.
Wagner advised that a 30' easement would be required at this
location. Wagner advised that all easements would have to be
to grade with a final plat before they would lay the gas pipe.
Wagner stressed the problem with the developers grading the
property after the gas pipes, electric, etc. have been placed.
Mr. Crownover advised that they were having the same problem, and
may have to require that the trenching be made deeper in order
to keep the final coverage. Bishop advised he had not had any
problems in the past, and is highly in favor of standardizing
the depth of all utility lines. Bishop advised that when
he begins digging, he will call the utility companies out to
locate the lines.
Wagner advised that Arkansas Western Gas has an existing gas
line up the west side of the property which goes up and turns
back west on the north side of Masonic Drive and on the south
side of the racquet club. He advised that the gas company will
tie into the existing corner. Jones advised that the 8' common
area on the east side of Summerhill belongs to Summerhill
and is part of a 25' utility easement given by Summerhill.
Wagner wanted to know what lots 24-29, block 1, Phase II would
show as an easement. Milholland advised he was going to show
a 20' rear yard easement, but Milholland advised there is the
8' common area plus another easement along the backside of
Summerhill. Wagner was questioning the fact of whether or
not that was an easement. Wagner advised that the existing
gas line is turned back west at Just about the northwest corner
of lot 25.
9) L. 0. Ferguson (Warner Amex Cable):
Ferguson wished to know if they were going to be able to serve
these lots in block 1 from the Summerhill Utilities. Ferguson
advised there were pedestals in the back yards, but the yards are
mowed. If this can be used, .there is no problem. They will not
need the other 20'. Otherwise, they will need it to put the line
in. Ferguson wished to know if there was anywhere that concrete
drainage ditches would be present such as are present at Rolling
Meadows where lot crossing will be necessary. Milholland
advised he did not have intention to put concrete in. Ferguson
advised that he would request 2" schedule 40 PVC across
Wedgewood Drive between lots 1 and 2 of block 2, approximately
70'-; between lots 5 and 6; and block 4 along Castlewood Drive,
between lots 12 and 13, Ferguson stated he would need a crossing
there as well. Ferguson then requested a copy of the final plat
in order to get their plans drawn up. Jones suggested that
after Planning Commission approval is obtained, give the utility
companies a revised preliminary and they can get their plans together
from that.
•
•
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE EIGHT.
January 12, 1983
Milholland advised that this would be fine. At the time
that Planning Commission approval has been obtained, he will
send a rough draft of this plat to the utility companies.
Ferguson advised it would be 2-3 months before he could get
the materials for this job.
Wagner advised that if he were to receive a rough draft of the
final plat, they would be able to put the service in at anytime.
Wagner advised that the reason they needed a final plat is that
they are required to map where each service is; they must have the
exact distance behind each and every lot. Wagner also advised that
the gas company liked to put their services right on the lot line.
Crownover advised he would submit his needs to the developer later.
Wagner advised that in order to serve the east side of the
subdivision with gas, they will tap the high pressure gas main.
The three utility companies requested 2-3 months in order to
get final approval, particularly in the case of Warner Amex
Cable, then the material has to be ordered. They do not ship
it when it is approved, it must be ordered. Milholland stated
this would be no problem because the first thing he plans on
doing is locating the lot lines on paper before the sewer
locations are ever begun. Milholland stated it would take him
some time to do the design, draw it up, plus bid it, etc. Therefore,
several months would be available anyway. He will bid phase
one in a matter of 45 days. Wagner asked if the entire Phase I
project would be completed as quickly as possible, or would five or
so houses be built at a time; because if all of Phase I will be
built at the same time, Arkansas Western Gas will provide a contract
which will need to be signed; however, if block 2 will be the
beginning location, and you will build 5 or 6 houses through there and
want the gas line extended as it is bid, then this is a different
procedure. Bishop advised that since, if you do not develop a
lot in five (5) years, you lose your money, in all probability,
all of the Phase I will be constructed. However, he could not
give a concrete answer.
Milholland advised that they would try to work closely on
the trenching because they did not want to pay twice for the
trenching, and want time for all to be able to accomplish their
needs.
Wagner stated that he wished to stress that on the north side
of Stubblefield Road, before digging, PLEASE CALL HIM, as
there is a high pressure gas line present there, between
150 and 170 pounds. Milholland asked if this gas line comes within
the 25' setback, and would the Gas Company accept this as their
easement. Wagner advised that they probably would, but would have
to go through Arkansas Western Gas operating department. Jones
advised that it appeared this was drawn very close to the 25' set -
2
r
• PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE NINE
January 12, 19$4
back line. Will they need to have buildings back another 25'
from that line. Milholland advised that this had not been specifically
located, but was just taken off the plat book. Wagner advised
that structures would have to be 25' from the high pressure gas
line. Setback should be shown on the plat with a note that the
structures would need to be located 25' from the high pressure
gas line. Wagner advised there was a sign on the fence plus a
notice right on top of the gas line.
10) Bobbie Jones (Planning Administrator):
1) Lot 16, Block 3 is a tandem lot and will require conditional
use approval from the Planning Commission. There is a $30.00 fee
on that. Tandem lot setbacks are 20 feet from any property
line. The driveway must be paved to a point at least 25' past the
street right-of-way. The builder must also install either a
garbage can holder at the street and screen it, or a 20 x 40
foot turnaround with no parking at anytime on the driveway or at
the end of the driveway. Jones stated she would add a note
if the Planning Commission approves this, with the conditions
• of the approval to be put on the final plat.
2) Jones advised that sidewalks need to be shown. A 4' concrete
sidewalk is required on one side of each street, and all the way
around the cul-de-sacs. Jones advised to look carefully at any
grade problems or drainage structure problems which might affect
the building of one. Jones advised that the master sidewalk plan
requires a sidewalk on the south side of Stubblefield Road, so
it would not be required of this developer.
3) Because of some recent court rulings, any portion of this
original property description which lies in Stubblefield Road must
be shown as a dedication. If what Bishop purchased left some area
that was not previously shown as a street dedication, The City may
need a 5' or so Quit Claim from the heirs of the Hemingway Estate
to get the confirmation of right-of-way. Stubblefield Road
is to be upgraded as stated by Clayton Powell.
4) On the street names, Cambridge cannot be used because we
already have a Cambridge, and on the one mentioned as Winfield
and Castlewood, this would need to be broken down into more
names to comply with Don Osburn's requirements. Jones advised
she would have to check with Don Osburn, but it appeared that
it would be feasible to run Castlewood from the corner of Winfield
up to the southeast corner of Lot 4, block 5.
• 5) Street light placing, as submitted, varies up to 470' and
after the Engineer and Mr. Crownover get together, get back
with David MoWethy for his comments and then furnish the information
Q
to the Planning Office.
6) Addressing waivers requested, #3, Jones advised that the
zoning ordinance writes in an automatic provision for a
waiver with two proviso's. On the turning radius of a cul-de-sac,
as long as the lot dimension is 70' at the setback line, it is
acceptable. Jones advised she would need a note of some kind
that tells what the lot widths are at the 25' setback lines.
Jones advised that one of the lots was not at the turning radius
of a cul-de-sac, that being lot 22, block 1, and in addition to the
70' at the setback line, it further states that on that lot, and
on lot 2, block 4, you must have 80% of the required frontage
at the street right-of-way line. Therefore, lot 22, block 1
would need a 56' frontage there. Jones advised that any
other waiver given would have to go to the Board of Adjustment.
On waivers requested, #1T, Jones advised that if this applies
to the east end of both blocks 1 and block 5, then this would
be left up to the Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission,
but she did not see any problem with it.
7) Jones advised that she did like to have the developer and the
owner shown on the plat, other than just in the title block,
that.being, owner, developer and engineer. Also, where there
is land usage survey description, Jones advised that she
liked acreage shown, and the acreage highlighted there. She
advised she would like this set forth as follows: Acreage: 26.09
acres; Zoning: R-1, Low Density Residential; Proposed use: Single
Family Residential.
Jones advised that the covenants would need to be submitted by
the time this goes to the Planning Commission. Jones advised
that Bishop would also need to submit proof to her that all
property owners within 100 feet of the boundary of the sub-
division have been notified by the time it goes to the Planning
Commission, but actually, this should be by the time it goes to the
Subdivision Committee. Jones advised she would check with the
City Attorney to see whether the Greenspace will apply if these
both go before the Planning Commission at the same meeting.
Jones stated that the City Attorney had provided her with an amend-
ment to the Greenspace Ordinance and this has been advertised for
the next Planning Commission Meeting; however, a second
ordinance amendment was presented yesterday which has not been
advertised, and Jones advised she would need to check with the
City Attorney on this. Jones advised that this second amend-
ment may delay the first one until the end of February which
may allow this subdivision to be approved beforehand.
10
J
. PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE TEN
January 12, 1984
•
•
•
PLAT REVIEW MEETING
PAGE ELEVEN
January 12, 1984
8) Jones advised she would need ten (1) copies of the revised
plat, showing street names, easements, everything asked for.
Jones advised that if she gets these, this would go before the
Subdivision Committee probably the 20th and Planning Commission
on the 23rd.
10) Jones highlighted the waivers requested, that being, waiver
of the jog from the intersection of Loxley and Wedgewood from
150 feet to 90 feet, centerline to centerline.
11) On lot 10, block 4 is going to require a special design of
building there due to the fact that there is such a short
building area along the north side. Jones advised that there may be
difficulty on 25 & 26, block 1 also.
Milholland asked if he brought the Phase I boundary and showed
future Phase II and showed the easements across the boundary line
of Phase I over into future Phase II, along the back of
the lots in block 4, would this be adequate. Jones advised that the
street right-of-way dedication would have to be shown as well as
the utility easement, and where the easement has to cross and
get out of Phase I, where it gets into Phase II, you will
need to do the off-site easement dedication; reference it on the
plat , write it up, dedicate it and file it with Phase I.
Where the two (2) streets deadend into other property to the north
and east, carry a full 50' street right-of-way to the Subdivision
boundary. Also, show a temporary cul-de-sac right-of-way with
a 50' radius; the additional right-of-way in the cul-de-sac
should be noted to revert to the adjoining lots when the street is
extended.
Meeting adjourned at 12:30 p.m.
I I
PAGE SUBJECT DATE
1
i12
17
21
26
30
35
41
46
52
60
63
68
71
72
74
76
79
84
90
100
102
106
119
124
130
134
140
140
146
152
156
159
163
169
170
175
178
181
186
190
194
198
200
204
207
Wade Bishop, Yorktown Square Subdivision (Stubblefield
Jerry Sweetser (LSD - W. Poplar)
Lindsey Construction (Corner of Gregg and
George Faucette, Jr (LSD - Deane Street)
Wade Bishop, Dev.'/ Yorktown Square Subd.
Meadowridge Phase III (Preliminary Plat)
Dillard's Expansion (LSD - 4201 N. Shiloh)
Muley's Restaurant (LSD - Colt Square Dr.)
Lindsey Construction (LSD - Chestnut Ave. Apts.)
Butterfield Trail Village (LSD - Joyce St.)
Robert Whitfield (Oakland Townhouses - Oakland
Earl Ogden, Jr (LSD - Cato Springs Road)
Joe Thomson (LSD - El Chico Restaurant)
Bill Kennedy (Street Closing - Yeater Ave.)
Johnie Bassett (Replat Colt Square)
Lenwyn K. or Kathy Edens (LSD - 646 W. Sycamore)
Hardees F, Walmart Discount Store (LSD - W. 6th St.)
Windsor Townehomes (LSD - Cambridge Place)
University Baptist Church (LSD - Vandeventer St.)
Woodland Hills (LSD - Wedington near Garland)
Park Place (Final Plat - Phase II)
Mount Comfort Acres (Subdivision)
Intersection of Green Acres Rd. $ Hwy 71 North
Zion Acres (Prel. Plat - Outside City Limits)
Jim Hatfield (Sunny Lane - Old Missouri at Old Wire Rd.).
Crafton, Tull, Span @ Yoe Architects , Union Special (Garland - LSDY
Bronze Tree Village by Ralph Brophy (N. of Township Rd., E. of College)
Lindsey Construction (Vantage Square Subd. - Front St. - Wilson Center)
First South Federal Savings & Loan Office Bldg.(College at Dickson)
Fayetteville Industrial Park West (Preliminary Plat)
Oakshire Apartments Phase II (Lots 13, 14 E* 15 Blk 2
Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints (Addition -
J.B. Hays, Developer (Park Place Ph. III g IV)'
Bib Whitfield (Oakland Townhouses Ph. III - Poplar $ Leverett)
L.A. Brush MFG. Co. (LSD - 1501 S. Armstrong - F'ville Ind. Park)
Christian Life Center / Red Dixon (1285 Milsap Rd.) -
Kim Fugit , Developer (American College - 3448 N. College
Spot -Not Car Wash.(LSD - Dandy Oil'at Hwy 62 $ Razorback)
J.B. Hays (Jim -Bow Addition - Jimmie Ave.)
Point West Addition (Final Plat)
Lindsey Construction / Starr - GMAC Bldg. (Frontage
Point West Subdivision (LSD - Lots 1 f, 2 Blk "C")
Mini Warehouses (996 S. Beechwood - Prel. Plat)
Jeremy Hess $ Rephael Gusman/ The Law Quad Apts. (Sycamore near Leverett)
Jim Lindsey $ C.A. Sexton (Front & Joyce St. - Blk 9 A.6 W Subdivision)
Park Place (PUD Area - Concept Plat)
Township)
(Revised
Road)
Plat)
Ave.)
(RE:
Drainage
Facility)
Kantz Place)
Zion Rd. - Albright
Ave.)
$ Zion Rds.)
01-12-84
01-26-84
01-26-84
01-26-84
02-02-84
02-09-84
02-09-84
02-16-84
02-16-84
03-01-84
03-01-84
03-01-84
03-15-84
03-22-84
03-22-84
03-22-84
03-29-84
04-19-84
04-26-84
05-17-84
05-31-84
05-31-84
06-07-84
06-14-84
06-21-84
06-21-84
07-05-84
07-05-84
07-26-84
08-09-84
08-22-84
En)08-30-84
08-30-84
09-06-84
09-13-84
09-20-84
09-20-84
09-27-84
09-27-84
10-11-84
10-11-84
10-18-84
12-06-84
12-06-84
12-06-84
12-06-84