HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-02-21 Minutes•
L
I
MINUTES OF A PLAT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
q3
A meeting of the Plat Review Committee was held February 21, 1974 at 9:00 A.M. in the
Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Utility Representatives: Clyde Terry.
Developer: Ronald Godfrey.
OthersPresent: Bobbie Jones, Paul Mattke, Clayton Powell, David McWethy, Wally Brt
Iris Dees.
The only item for discussion was the large scale development for
an addition to Buckner Friendship Baptist Church located at
2750 Wyman Road. Ronald Godfrey was present to represent the
proposal. Comments were as follows:
BUCKNER FRIENDSHIP
BAPTIST CHURCH
2750 Wyman Road
LSD Plan
1. Clyde Terry: They do not want TV cable so there is no problem.
2. Clayton Powell: Although the Major Street Plan only requires an additional 5 feet
of right-of-way on each street I will request that you dedicate 10 feet of right-
of-way on Wyman Road and Stone Bridge Road because I think this will develop as a
collector. Mr. Godfrey found this acceptable. Mr. Powell said Wyman Road is
scheduled for paving from Crossover Road to the Eastern city limits. He saidethe
City street maintenance ordinance says that when a street is scheduled for paving
if the property owners are willing to cooperate and pay for the curb and guttering
in connection with this paving, we will do all of the construction, all of the base
work, establish the grades and set the center line of the street on the right-of-way
and then pave from the edge of the existing street to the flow line makings your
side of the street up to current City street standards. Clayton Powell requested
Ronald Godfrey to take this information back to his Church Committee and tell them
the City is willing to do this in congunction with their construction as well as
the City street paving. It will enhance the value of the property and make the
property more aesthetically pleasing. You would have to storm drain along Wyman
Road if you put in curb and gutter. If there were any street widening you would
probably have to remove or replace the retaining wall. Since the drainage does come
from the parking lot onto the street, maybe you could put scuper drains from the
sides of the driveway to dump the water into the drainage ditch rather than into
the street. The gravel does wash onto the street. Mr. Godfrey asked Mr. Powell
about the storm drain. He said the crest of the hill is right in the driveway and
it drains both ways; would they still need the storm drain since it is not that
much of a ditch. Clayton Powell said he would only need the storm drain if the
church decided to go with the curb and gutter. If the crest is here as you say,
we could put in a curb drop inlet or catch basin on the corner to catch the water
that flowed in the curb and gutter. If that would be the case, you would only be
speaking of approximately $460 for curb and gutter.
3. Paul Mattke: He asked what the purpose of the retaining wall was. Mr. Godfrey
said it is existing now and it's about 3 feet high. Mr. Mattke was concerned that
it might interfer with sight distance. He said the City is in design stages now
of a water main to go through the area approximately where the retaining wall is.
Mr. Godfrey said it was just there to hold back the soil and infact, when you get
around the retaining wall on Stone Bridge Road it lust slopes off down into the
ditch. Paul Mattke said they have sewer lines planned to go up the west side of
Stone Bridge Road this spring. If you are going to make the requested dedications
of right-of-way, I will need a 10 -foot easement on Stone Bridge Road and a 15 -foot
easement on Wyman. I will need 20 and 25 foot easements if you do not make the
dedications that is from the existing right-of-way. We will have fire hydrants
when we bring the water through and the church can probably'save money on fire
insurance premiums.
93
•
•
•
Plat Review Committee
February 21, 1974
Page Two
4. Wally Brt: No problems.
5. David McWethy: No comments.
6. Jack Whitting: (Rep. of Ozark Electric - telephoned) We have service in there
already, I see no problem.
7. Roy Hawkins: (Rep. of S.W. Bell Tel. Co. - telephoned) They have nothing within
60 yards of where the proposed addition is. He sees no problems.
8. Bobbie Jones: She said an additional 3 parking spaces are needed. There is a
total of 28 spaces required. Mr. Godfrey said it was just a rough gravel parking
lot. Bobbie Jones discussed parking requirements including durable and dustless
surface, screening along the south side of parking, and wheel stops. There are
no problems on setbacks of parking or building. She requested a revised drawing
showing dedications and revised parking spaces.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 A.M.
94