Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-12-01 MinutesLJ 9.. MINUTES OF A PLAT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING 86 The Plat Review Committee met at 3:30 P.M., Wednesday, December 1, 1971, in the Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas. O Present: Paul Mattke, Clayton Powell, Harold Lieberenz. no Utility Representatives: Herbert Holcomb, David Tucker, Clyde Terry. Developers & Engineers: None. The first matter discussed was the proposed site plan for Happy Hollow HAPPY HOLLOW School. Mr. Lieberenz explained they are anxious for a building permit, ELEMENTARY SCH. but this is larger than one acre and also a conditional use in the R-1 Conditional Use District. Comments were as follows: L.S.Development 1. Paul Mattke: Right-of-way for Fourth Street from Happy Hollow Road onto the school property was dedicated by Ed Connell and accepted by the City Board of Directors several years ago. Right-of-way for Ray Avenue into the school property has not been dedicated. Fourth Street must be constructed to minimum street standards. Ca, Mr. Mattke requested "Ray" be dedicated for utilities at least. He also suggested putting in a cul de sac on the end of Fourth Street or dedicating Ray as a Street. Mr. Mattke needs a 25 ft* easement for the water line across the south part of the parking lot. �i He thought an agreement should be obtained at this time that • I they would be willing to dedicate additional street extensions through to the East and North at some future date and not land - lock property. y W 2. Herbert Holcomb: The school building is 50 ft. south of his (n territory line. It is in Ozarks Electric. (Mr. Whitting was Q not present.) W D 3. David Tucker: If Ray Street is not dedicated all the way through to the north property line, he would like a 15 ft. easement all along the West side of the property. tr 4. Clyde Terry: No problem if he can get in street right-of-way. 0 5. Harold Lieberenz: Must be approved by Planning Commission as a Im large scale development and also as a conditional use. The only questions still not answered were (1) Does the collector street shown on the Major Street Plan cross this property? (2) Can this property be classified as a lot of record --was it in existence in these dimensions on July 6, 1970? 6. Clayton Powell: No plans for street construction included. Ray Street and Fourth Street should meet minimum city standards including width of 32 ft, back to back. If they plan to continue Ray Street, they should have it continue up to the north end of the parking lot with a private drive off and into the parking lot. • Culs on East side should be at least 32 ft. in driving width. a 12-1-71 -2- On drainage, recommended catch basins or scuppers drains at termination of curbs and gutters where they intersect streets •, with barrow ditches on Ray and on Happy Hollow Road. Also at intersection of natural drainage basins. Parking facilities look good as shown, but should make some provision for drainage out of parking area. Turn radii is included in City street construction standards. Lim The next matter discussed was the revision of the proposed L. C. Barnes L. C. BARNES I Subdivision Plat. Comments were as follows: "Informal" Plat Mr. Tucker said that he had worked for Baldwin some years back and they had at one time had plans to move their general offices here to the property south of Barnes. This was discussed in connection with a future extension of a street between the two properties. 4. Clyde Terry: Would like to see a 25 ft. easement along the south property line. 5. Clayton Powell: The 50 ft, service road easement includes a 20 ft. utility easement. These should be separate. The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 P.M. • �a C T :t;f 1. Paul Mattke: Felt the earlier recommendations of the Plat Review Committee should be followed. He did not think it a good arrangement to show the service road up the West side of the property. 2. Herbert Holcomb: Had talked to Mr. Morgan with Humble Oil. Mr. Holcomb has made a commitment to serve the station from athe center south if he could get an easement 25 ft. wide along the south property line of Barnes and then get an easement up to the service station property from the SW corner. If Barnes Fwill give Mr. Holcomb a written easement along these same lines to record, he can honor the commitment; otherwise, he will have to serve from Highway 62 on the NE corner of the property. The problem with building down to the NE corner of the property is UJ that if the widening and four-laning of Highway 62 which the U) Chamber of Commerce is working for is accomplished, the lines would be in the way of any widening. W fL 3. David Tucker: Southwestern Bell has 4 service cables crossing cd this property that are not in easements. Two of them carry all he western part of the county. Barnes the communication lines to the', and Southwestern Bell have agreed to rearrange these line; but Sr Mr. Tucker will need notice of when to move them and where to move 0 them to. P� Mr. Tucker would like to see a 25 ft. easement across the south of Barnes property. Mr. Tucker said that he had worked for Baldwin some years back and they had at one time had plans to move their general offices here to the property south of Barnes. This was discussed in connection with a future extension of a street between the two properties. 4. Clyde Terry: Would like to see a 25 ft. easement along the south property line. 5. Clayton Powell: The 50 ft, service road easement includes a 20 ft. utility easement. These should be separate. The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 P.M. • �a C T :t;f