HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-10-27 MinutesO MINUTES OF A PLAT REVIEW COMMTrTEE MEETING 77
The Fayetteville Plat Review Committee met at 3:30 P.M., Wednesday,
October 27, 1971, in the Directors Room, City Administration Building,
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Present: Harold Lieberenz, Paul Mattke, Clayton Powell.
Utility Representatives Present: Herbert Holcomb, Clyde Terry, David Tucker,
Developers & Engineers: Glen Oldham, Calvin Edens, Ralph Goff, Gens Schism.
The first matter discussed was the proposed large scale development plan
submitted by Glen Oldham for property to the East of East 16 Animal GLEN OLDHAM
Hospital on which he plans to build a retail furniture store. Comments L.S.D`evelopment
were submitted as follows:
1, Clayton Powell: No problems if plans satisfactory with the
State.
2. Clyde Terry and David Tucker: Nora problems.
3. Ozarks Electric: (not present, but submitted by phone)
Do not obtain easements when outside City, but if they are
platting requested 15 ft. easement either side of electric
line.
4. Paul Mattke: Discussed cost of tapping into sewer line.
Mr. Oldham said he holds two letters giving taps to Mr.
Fletcher which should reduce the cost. Mr. Oldham said
there will be a 12 ft. drop from his building to the
sewer line as he has put about 80 loads of fill in and
leveled the forepart of the lot. Mr. Mattke said if
Mr. Oldham wanted to install a sprinkler system, it can be
done but it will take a while because the water line is on
the North side of the highway.
5. Harold Lieberenz: Parking spaces shown are sufficient, but
they need to be located at least 5 ft. from the side property
line and screened. Mr. Lieberenz noted that permits have been
obtained from the Arkansas Highway Department for the driveway
entrances.
The next matter discussed was the large scale development plan submitted
by Calvin Edens. This had been reviewed September 16, 1971, but there CALVIN EDENS
were a few unresolved problems and the Planning Commission would not L.S.Development
approve the plan until the problems were alleviated. Comments were
as follows:
1. Harold Lieberenz: Mr. Edens had talked to Luther Tharp,
Sanitation Superintendent, in the presence of Mr. Lieberenz
and had worked.out a satisfactory solution to the trash
problem. The parking lot and its access drive are to be
paved, but a graveled drive will circle from the South end
• of the parking lot, to the East, and back up the proposed
street.
10-27-71 -2- 78
2. Paul Mattke: Asked whether proposed street is an easement
for future street or right-of-way dedication. It was determined
of it is an easement for future street and utilities. Mr. Ma'ttke
said this is satisfactory; if it had been a right-of-way
dedication, any drive or improvement would have to be done to
minimum street standards.
Twelve units is the dividing line between master metering and
individual metering on complexes. Since 12 units are proposed
this can be metered either way. Mr. Edens said he preferred
master metering.
Mr. Mattke repeated his previous statement on the Replat of Leflar's
Addition:
1. Need easement between Lots 4 and 3 widened to either 71 feet
either side of sewer line; or 5 ft. on one side and 10 fte
on the other side for a total of 15 ft.
2. Extend water line.
The next matter discussed was the large scale development plan submitted
on behalf of Consumer's I.G.A. for property North of Highway 62 and West CONSUMER'S'
of Highway 71 By-pass. Ralph Goff, Jr.; and Gene Schism were present. I.G.A
Comments were as follows: L.S.Development
.aw�PcO
1. Herbert Holcomb: Requested 5 ft. easement along the West
property line.
2. Clyde Terry: TV cable buried somewhere along the West property
line, but not sure exactly where.
3. David Tucker: No problem, but will have to bring line across
Highway 62.
4. Paul Mattke: Asked about provision for service road. Mr. Goff
said none of this property touches the By-pass right-of-way.
Will be necessary to do one of two things to get sewer service:
(1) Obtain public sewer easement across the Coleman property
to the East to get to the sewer manhole, or (2) Have to tunnel
under the Highway 62 to get to sewer line on South side of
Highway 62. The Highway Department does not want utility lines
in highway right-of-way. He estimated the cost of tunneling
to be a minimum of $50.00 a foot. The City has a forced line
coming in from Farmington in the future. The City might be
able to share the cost of crossing.
The water line is also on the South side of Highway 62. The
cost of crossing will be about the same on water. The two
lines cannot be put in the same tunnel; they must be separated
by at least 10 ft. If the developer wants to sprinkle, it
40
may require an 8 inch line.
10-27-71 -3- 79
5.
Clayton Powell: Plan indicates drainage from the property
goes to Highway 62. The developer will have to work with
the Arkansas Highway Department on that.
6.
Larry Wood: (not present, but phoned in comments) Suggested
an agreement be worked out with Mr. Coleman to make the
eastern most access point a^joint access point (20 ft. on
each property). He noted the rezoning of the properties had
been a joint effort. The access to the rear of the property
appears very tight; only 18 ft. on the East side of the
building. He questioned whether they could get their service
trucks through the 18 ft. width. Signs far exceed the present
regulations. What is the other proposed building? It will
block a driveway loop around the building.
i
7�.
Ralph Goff, Jr.: No chance of working with Mr. Coleman.
Mr. Goff felt an 18 ft. driveway to the rear was sufficient
and said he did not intend to loop around the building.
Driveway access will have to be farther West than I.G.Als
East property line because of median.
(Mr. Goff phoned later in the week and said that the highway
regulations require the driveway to be set in a minimum of
6 ft. from the property line and that the median comes out
20 or 30 ft. into the I.G.A. property.)
8.
Harold Lieberenz: Reviewed sign regulations. Questioned
provisions for trash disposal. Required State Health Department
approval before issuance of building permits. Parking area
required to be dustless. Need parking area drawn in. Also,
need wheel barriers to keep cars inside parking area.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 P.M.
0