Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-01-12 Minutes• • • MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held January 12, 1998 at 5:30 p.m. in Room 219 of the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: ITEMS REVIEWED: 1. RZ97-22.10: Shahryar Khajehnajafi 2. RZ97-23.10: Shahryar Khajehnajafi 3. RZ98-1.00 Richard Mayes 4. RZ98-2.00 Sam Rogers 5. CU98-2.00 Jim Smithwick APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES The minutes were approved as distributed. OLD BUSINESS: Conrad Odom, Phyllis Johnson, Lee Ward, John Watkins, Gary Tucker, Lorel Hoffman, and Bob Reynolds Alett Little, Tim Conklin, Dawn Warrick, and Sharon Langley ACTION TAKEN Approved/fwd City Council Approved/fwd City Council Approved w/conditions/fwd City Council Approved/fwd City Council Approved w/conditions RZ97-22 10' SHAHRYAR KHAJEHNAJAFI (pp 401) N SIDE OF WEDINGTON, W OF RUPPLE ROAD The first item before the Planning Commission was rezoning request RZ97-22.10 submitted by Lew Steenken on behalf of Shahryar Khajehnajafi for property located on the north side of Wedington Road, west of Rupple Road. The property contains 5 61 acres and the request is to rezone from A-1, Agriculture, to R -O, Residential Office. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends approval of the requested R -O zoning with no conditions. Mr. Steenken reminded the Commission they had reviewed the tract previously when his client had requested commercial zoning. He stated the applicant had modified the requested change to R -O. • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 2 Ms. Hoffman stated she had indicated at that previous meeting she could support R -O zoning since she believed it would support the neighbors' needs more appropriately than commercial. She did, however, express concern as to commercial traffic on Meadowlands. She explained she had believed there would be a buffer between the residential area and the subject property. Mr. Steenken advised his client did not have a development plan. He pointed out the tract would be required to go through the large scale development process prior to any construction. Mr. Odom pointed out the property would be some what protected by the R -O zoning, since it was restrictive. Public Comment: There was no public comment. In response to a question from Mr. Forney, Mr. Steenken stated the property was 333 feet deep. Mr. Forney stated the depth of the tract would necessitate Meadowlands handling some commercial traffic but would also eliminate some curb cuts on Wedington. MOTION Mr. Forney moved to approve RZ97-22.10. Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-2-0 with Commissioners Forney, Odom, Hoffman, Ward, and Reynolds voting "yes" and Commissioners Watkins and Tucker voting "no". • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 3 RZ97-23 10: SHAHRYAR KHAJEHNAJAFI (pp 401) N SIDE OF WEDINGTON. W OF RUPPLE ROAD The next item before the Planning Commission was rezoning request RZ97-23.10 submitted by Lew Steenken on behalf of Shahryar Khajehnajafi for property located on the north side of Wedington Road, west of Rupple Road. The property contains 3.24 acres and the request is to rezone from A-1, Agriculture, to R -O, Residential Office. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends approval of the requested R -O zoning with no conditions. Mr. Steenken advised the subject tract adjoined the property on which the Commission had just voted and was to the west of the E -Z Mart. He contended residential use on this tract was minimal and R -O would make the property much more useful. In response to a question from Mr. Reynolds, Ms. Little advised the widening of Wedington into a 4 -lane road would include the subject property. Public Comment: There was no public comment. Mr. Tucker stated there was still considerable vacant R -O property in the area and, therefore, he would vote against the rezoning. Mr. Watkins stated he had voted no on the previous rezoning and would vote no on this rezoning also because they were starting the "domino effect" on Wedington Road. He reminded the Commission there was another rezoning request coming later in the meeting for rezoning on Wedington. He contended they were approving strip development all along Wedington which was inconsistent with the 2020 Plan. MOTION Ms. Hoffman moved to approve RZ97-23.10 from A-1 to R -O. Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion. Mr. Forney stated he agreed that they did not want to encourage strip zoning. He advised that, in many cases, R -O had been applied as a way to get more dense use than strictly residential on Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 4 properties such as the one they were discussing. He expressed his belief the R -O zoning was the best tool they had to deal with sites such as the subject tract. He further stated he would like to see some of the R -O property be developed residentially. He advised he believed they should consider some alternative strategy other than R-1, -2, -3 and R -O or an amendment to R -O. He further stated he believed the tract was large enough that they could control the access and limit curb cuts. Mr. Tucker expressed his belief there was already sufficient land zoned appropriately. Mr. Watkins stated he would feel better about working on alternative plans if the Commission were to impose a moratorium. He advised that, since he lived in Fayetteville, anyone who wanted something rezoned got it rezoned, creating the domino effect. Mr. Reynolds pointed out there was a business to the west of the subject tract. He also noted the State Highway Department was widening Wedington in the area to four lanes. He expressed his belief no one would want to construct a residence on the subject tract. Mr. Tucker stated a plant nursery (the business to the west) was a conditional use in A-1 zoning. He advised he did not believe that was extending commercial zoning. Ms. Hoffman advised she also was not in favor of "strip development". She pointed out there was an absence of neighborhood services in the subject area and, by providing those services, the traffic on Wedington would be cut down. She further stated to rezone the property R -O was within the 2020 Plan guidelines by providing services available to residents where they were needed. Ms. Johnson stated she did not believe the Commission had contributed to the "domino effect". The motion carried 6-2-0 with Commissioners Forney, Odom, Hoffman, Ward, Reynolds and Johnson voting yes and Commissioners Watkins and Tucker voting no. • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 5 NEW BUSINESS: RZ98-LOO: REZONING REQUEST - RICHARD MAYES AUTO 1637 NORTH LEVERETT (W SIDE OF LEVERETT, S OF SYCAMORE) The next item was a rezoning request submitted by Dave Jorgensen, Jorgensen & Associates, on behalf of Richard Mayes for property located at 1637 North Leverett (west side of Leverett, south of Sycamore) The property contains .29 of an acre and the request is to rezone from R-2, Medium Density Residential, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning from R-2 to C-2. Mr. Jorgensen explained the location was scheduled for improvements both by the City and by Mr. Mayes. He reminded the Commission they had, a few months earlier, brought the same tract forward for a conditional use for a parking lot for the Mayes Auto business. He stated that, since that time, they had decided to construct the new building behind the existing building and then demolish the existing building once they were moved into the new building. He questioned the staff's requirement that the business would have to go through the large scale development process, since it was less than 1 acre, there would not be 25 new parking spaces and the curb cuts would remain the same. Mr. Conklin stated the site would be completely redeveloped with 33 total parking spaces and changes in the curb cuts. Mr. Jorgensen explained there were time restraints due to the City asking the owner to have the building and move completed by September. He stated it would be much faster if they did not have go take the project through large scale development. Mr. Odom stated the Planning Commission did not have the authority to waive the large scale development requirement. Mr. Conklin stated staff did want the project to go through the Large scale development process. He explained the applicant would be removing an existing building, developing new parking, and meeting the commercial design standards. He advised staff would be more comfortable with the Planning Commission reviewing the design of the proposed building. Mr. Odom pointed out a large scale development could be approved at the subdivision level. • • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 6 In response to a question from Mr. Odom, Ms. Little stated the ordinance set forth the conditions when a large scale development was required. She advised staff believed the proposed project met those conditions. Public Comment: There was no public comment. MOTION Ms. Johnson moved to approve RZ98-1 from R-2 to C-2. Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion. Ms. Hoffman noted that, in 1992, the applicant offered a bill of assurance which prohibited the use of the adjacent C-2 property for establishments which distributed or offered the sale of alcoholic beverages of any kind or allowed the property to be used for a night club, private club, or dance hall. She asked if the applicant was also offering the same bill of assurance for the subject tract Mr. Jorgensen advised they were offering the same bill of assurance Ms. Johnson stated the motion was contingent upon the offer from the applicant to assure the property would never have a liquor store or any business serving alcoholic beverages or a dance hall. Mr. Reynolds seconded the amended motion. The motion carried unanimously, 0-0. Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 7 RZ98-2.00 REZONING REQUEST - SAM ROGERS N OF WEDINGTON, W OF SALEM ROAD The next item was a rezoning request submitted by Kurt Jones, Northwest Engineers, on behalf of Sam Rogers for property located north of Wedington, west of Salem Road. The property contains 5.20 acres and the request is to rezone the property from R-2, Medium Density Residential, to R -O, Residential -Office Recommended Motion: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning subject to access to the entire tract being limited to one curb cut on Highway 16/Wedington Road and one curb cut on Salem Road. Mr. Jones stated the Highway 16 section was a very long strip of land to be limited to one curb cut (almost 700 feet of frontage). He advised there were specific plans for the corner -- construction of a bank. He pointed out the sale of the corner to the bank would require a lot split and he requested they discuss the curb cut issue at the time the lot split was considered. • Ms. Little explained the concem was the stacking from the stop light at Salem and Wedington. She advised any curb cut on Wedington would need to be clear of that stacking area. Mr. Jones stated he was not sure where the tract would be split since there were no final. designs and again requested the curb cut issue not be decided until the large scale development or lot split stage. Ms. Little stated the Planning Commission could delay the decision if they so wished. Ms. Johnson asked if there was any configuration under which the property could develop which would cause staff to change their recommendation to more than one curb cut. Ms. Little stated that, without seeing every possible configuration, she could not answer the question. She went on to say, however, that the recommendation was a very solid recommendation, noting they needed to protect the traffic flow on Wedington. She advised the chances of changing the staff recommendation were not great. Ms. Johnson stated that, due to the heavy traffic on Wedington, the fact that the roadway would soon be 4 -lane, the proximity to Rupple Road, the difficulties with the by-pass lights, etc., she did not believe they could ever agree to more than one curb cut. Ms Little agreed and stated it would be very difficult to envision a scenario where more than one • curb cut could be judged as safe. Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 8 In response to a question from Mr. Odom, Ms. Little advised she had recently talked with Eric Phillips, State Highway Department, to coordinate the curb cut policy. She stated she had been assured that, while the Highway Department had standards, the city could have more stringent standards than the Highway Department which would be enforced by the Highway Department. Public Comment: There was no public comment. Mr. Odom advised he would be very reluctant to approve the rezoning without the staff recommendations. He added he would listen to a request for a waiver at a later date should they have a configuration that would appear to be safe. Mr. Ward pointed out the Overlay District ordinance allowed a curb cut every 250 feet. Mr. Tucker asked if the applicant contemplated any residential uses on the tract. Mr. Jones stated the area immediately to the north (zoned R-2) would be developed residentially but he did not anticipate any residential development in the R -O area. Mr. Watkins asked how many acres of the 5.2 would be necessary for the bank. Mr. Jones stated he believed it would be 11/2 to 2 acres. He explained that, once the design began on the bank, he would have a better idea of how much land would be required and they would apply for a lot split. Ms. Little asked if the bank location had been determined. Mr. Jones stated the bank was interested in the southeast comer of the property. Ms. Little stated she believed the decision regarding curb cuts could be better made when they reviewed the lot split request. She suggested waiting until the lot split request was reviewed to make the access decisions. In response to a question from Mr. Odom, Ms. Little advised the Planning Commission could limit curb cuts at both lot split review and large scale development review. Mr. Forney stated he supported the staff's recommendation. He advised the applicant he would be willing to listen to a future proposal to amend the recommendation but he believed this was the time to place the limitation on the number of curb cuts. He further stated he did not believe the R -O zoning classification was inconsistent with the land use plan. He noted they might want Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 9 to review the R -O zoning classification since he did not believe there were any residential developments zoned R -O. MOTION Mr. Forney moved to approve RZ98-2.00 subject to staff recommendations. Ms Hoffman seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-2-0 with Commissioners Forney, Odom, Hoffman, Ward, Reynolds and Johnson voting "yes" and Commissioners Watkins and Tucker voting "no". • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 10 CU98-2.00: CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST (DUPLEX IN R-1 ZONE) JIM SMITHWICK - 420 ILA STREET (pp. 445) The last item on the agenda was a conditional use request to allow a duplex in an R-1 zoning district submitted by Stephanie Nelson on behalf of Jim Smithwick for property located at 420 Ila Street. Recommended Motion: Staff commended approval contingent upon compliance with Section 160.195, Conditions governing applications of conditional uses; procedures, of the zoning code. Mr. Conklin presented a petition which had been submitted to the Planning Office signed by residents of the area opposing the conditional use. He advised the Commission the applicant had also submitted a letter stating that, when he had purchased the house in 1991, the previous owner had constructed a second unit in the basement in 1947. He stated the second unit had at times been used as a rental. He explained to the Commission the house had caught on fire in August, 1997 and that the Inspection Division had discovered a second kitchen was being constructed when the house was being renovated from the fire He advised that, when there was a non -conforming condition which was destroyed by more than 50%, the condition can no longer occur. He stated duplexes were allowed in R-1 zoning districts only by conditional use. He further stated that, if the applicant intended to renovate the basement area into a second dwelling unit, they would need to apply for a conditional use. Ms. Stephanie Nelson, representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission and explained they just wanted to restore the home and were not adding anything that had not been there prior to the fire. She explained they planned to sell the house after it was restored. Ms. Susie Stephens, 318 Ila, informed the Commission she had watched the neighborhood go from rental property to owner occupied properties; they had spent thousands of dollars to upgrade the area to become a historical neighborhood, on the historical register. She noted the Smithwick home was the only house on the north side of Ila which was not included on the historic register. She expressed fear that allowing a duplex in the neighborhood would start a new cycle of rental properties. In response to a question from Mr. Odom, Ms. Stevens advised she had not been aware the property had been a duplex prior to the fire. 6 • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 11 Mr. Fred Stephen, 625 Wilson, echoed Ms. Stephens comments. He advised the neighborhood was improving and home owners were renovating the homes. He informed the Commission he had circulated the petition in opposition and not one person he had spoken to had been in favor of the conditional use. He expressed his belief a duplex was not compatible with the rest of the neighborhood. He also expressed concern regarding parking for a duplex. Mr. Joel Hersh, 622 Wilson, stated the subject house had been an owner -occupied residence for at least the last 12 years. He expressed his belief the proposed use was not compatible with the rest of the neighborhood. He further advised there were major traffic problems in the area due to the proximity to the university. Ms. Beverly Melton advised she had owned property in the subject neighborhood and had rented that property to college students. She told of the problems to her house and the neighborhood from renting her home. She also stated one of the major problems had been the lack of parking even though she had three parking spaces. She pointed out the Smithwick home also had three parking spaces and contended that was not enough when renting to college students. She advised the Smithwicks had not rented the basement area but their son had lived there. She expressed her belief a family with a relative living in the basement (like the Smithwick's) might work. Ms. Johnson asked the number of driveways on the Smithwick property. Ms. Nelson advised there was one driveway and it was located on Wilson. She stated that, as the owner of a residential design business, she too wanted to see the Wilson Park area maintained as a residential area. She further stated she just wanted to see the property restored as it was prior to the fire. Mr. Odom asked if they could require that one of the units be owner -occupied. Ms. Little advised the Planning Commission could ascribe any conditions to the conditional use request. In response to a comment from Ms. Hoffman, Mr. Odom stated that, since the item before them was a conditional use request, he believed the Planning Commission could add conditions. Mr. Watson advised he was in favor of requiring one of the units to be owner -occupied, noting he had lived in that neighborhood previously. MOTION Ms. Johnson moved to approve CU98-2.00, subject to staff comments and with the additional • condition that at least one of the residential units in the duplex must be owner -occupied. • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 12, 1998 Page 12 Mr. Tucker seconded the motion. Mr. Odom advised he would be more comfortable with the motion if the conditional use was re- visited or allowed to be re -visited within a certain period of time so that, if it was not working out, the applicant could come back. Ms. Johnson agreed it would be a good addition. Ms. Little stated that, if there were substantial complaints within a one year time frame, the conditional use is brought back before the Planning Commission. AMENDED MOTION Ms. Johnson added to her motion that, if there were adequate number of neighbor complaints within a one year period, the staff would bring the conditional use back before the Planning Commission. Mr. Odom advised he was in favor of the motion. Mr. Watson also stated he was in favor of the motion. He stated it appeared a reasonable balance between the neighborhood and the applicant. Ms. Hoffman stated she believed the conditional use was premature and speculative. Mr. Johnson stated it appeared to her the motion allowed the applicant to renovate the house to its status previous to the fire and also allowed the neighbors to have an owner -occupied house. Mr. Odom pointed out this was a unique situation since the property had burned. Mr. Tucker asked if had been being used as a duplex prior to the fire Ms. Nelson stated her parents had renovated the downstairs area and it had been habituated by her brother. She stated her brother had not paid any rent. The motion carried 6-2-0 with Commissioners Forney, Odom, Watkins, Tucker, Ward, and Johnson voting yes and Commissioners Hoffman and Reynolds voting no. The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. reL 0S PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1998 INDEX 2394 Big Oaks Drive (VA98-9) 08/10/98 2911 Birdie Drive (VA98-10) 08/10/98 70 East Poplar Street (LS98-5 & 6) 03/09/98 2097 Hailey Drive (VA98-8) 07/13/98 1780 Holly Street (RZ98-10) 05/11/98 4070 Huntsville Road (RZ98-13) 07/27/98 4070 Huntsville Road (RZ98-14) 07/27/98 420 Ila Street (CU98-2) 01/12/98 1285 Milsap Road (AD98-9) 02/23/98 1662 Mission (CU98-6) 02/23/98 2050 North College (AD98-18) 06/22/98 2050 North College (AD98-18) 07/27/98 2831 North Highway 112 (LSD98-12.1) 07/13/98 4045 North Hillside Terrace (CU98-12) 07/13/98 4045 North Hillside Terrace (LS98-25) 07/13/98 1637 North Leverett (RZ98-1) 01/26/98 3033 North Quail Drive (VA97-11) 02/09/98 226 North School (AD98-28) 10/12/98 4803 North Shiloh Drive (CU98-8) 04/27/98 1041 North Woolsey Ave. (CU98-16) 09/14/98 River Meadows Drive (AD98-11) 02/23/98 4500 South School Ave. (RZ98-3) 02/09/98 337 St. Charles Avenue (CU98-4) 02/09/98 4297 West Bellflower (VA98-6) 06/22/98 1 West Center (AD98-23) 08/20/98 310 West Dickson St (AD98-6) 02/23/98 310 West Dickson (VA98-4) 04/27/98 331 West Poplar Street (AD98-5) 02/23/98 406 West Sixth Street (AD98-12) 04/13/98 2701 Wyman Road (CU98-10) 05/11/98 Advanced Towing Barbed Wire Fence (AD98-5) 02/23/98 Advanced Towing Barded Wire Fence (AD98-5) 02/23/98 Alltell (CU98-8) 04/27/98 Amendment to Planning Commission ByLaws (AD98-13) 04/13/98 Amendment to Planning Commission ByLaws (AD98-13) 04/27/98 Arkansas Book Services (VA98-1) 01/26/98 Arkansas National Bank (LSD98-8) 04/27/98 Assisted Care Units (LSD98-13) 05/11/98 • Barrington Parke Subdivision, PH II (PP98-6) 08/24/98 Barrington Parke Subdivision, PH II (PP98-6) 08/24/98 Benard (CU98-26) 12/14/98 Bond, Paul & Geraldine (RZ98-13) 07/27/98 Bond, Paul & Geraldine (RZ98-14) 07/27/98 Cedar Lake Apartments (LSD98-4) 04/13/98 Cedar Lake Apartments (LSD98-19) 06/22/98 Charleston Place Street Design Variance (AD98-3) 01/26/98 Christian Life Church Access Road (AD98-9) 02/23/98 City of Fayetteville (CU98-3) 01/26/98 City of Fayetteville (RZ98-3) 02/09/98 CMN Business Park II, Ph I (PP98-4) 09/14/98 Cracker Barrel Signage (AD98-17) 06/08/98 Cracker Barrel (VA98-5) 06/08/98 Cracker Barrel (LSD98-14) 06/08/98 Davis (CU98-22) 11/09/98 Davis, Virginia (VA97-11) 02/09/98 Demaree Media, Inc. (RZ98-10) 05/11/98 DeWeese, John (CU98-5) 03/09/98 Dickson Downtown Enhancement Project 04/27/98 Dixie Development (RZ98-18) 10/26/98 Drake Field (RZ98-3) 02/09/98 Dykema, Dan (RZ98-7) 04/13/98 East Oaks Cul De Sac (AD98-27) 08/24/98 Easton Park Subdivision (PP98-2) 05/11/98 Easton Park Subdivision (AD98-20) 07/13/98 East Side Middle School (LSD98-11) 06/08/98 E.J. Ball Plaza (CU98-19) 10/26/98 Emerald Subdivision Ph II (VA98-11) Entel Technologies (CU98-17) 09/28/98 Fayetteville Senior Citizens Apts (AD98-4) 02/23/98 Fayetteville Senior Citizens Apts (AD98-4) 04/13/98 Fennel, Joe (AD98-6) 02/23/98 Fennel, Joe (VA98-4) 04/27/98 Gray (CU98-18) 10/12/98 Green, John & Lesley (VA98-9) 08/10/98 Guinn (PP98-9) 09/28/98 Hanna (LSD98-26) 09/28/98 Hayes, J.B. & Oma (VA98-7) 06/08/98 Hayes (CU95-39) 12/14/98 HMT of Fayetteville (LSD98-2) 02/23/98 Hog City Diner (AD98-23) 08/20/98 Hooker (CU98-15.1) 12/14/98 Hopkins Center (LSD98-29) 11/09/98 Islamic Center (CU98-25) 12/14/98 Jeffries, Nick (AD98-5) 02/23/98 Kantz Place (LSD98-15.2) 08/24/98 Kantz Place (LSD98-15.2) 08/24/98 Kantz Place (LSD98-15.2) 10/26/98 Keating Joint Venture (VA98-3) 04/27/98 Keating Joint Venture (LSD98-9) 04/27/98 Lee, Audra (CU98-6) 02/23/98 Liquor To Go (LSD98-12.1) 07/13/98 Marquess, Mark (RZ98-7) 04/13/98 Master Street Plan 11/23/98 Master Street Plan 12/14/98 • McAllister (CU98-21) 10/26/98 McAnamey, Robert (CU98-12) 07/13/98 McAnarney, Robert (LS98-25) 07/13/98 McCawley, Larry & Linda (CU98-10) 05/11/98 Medical Plaza (LSD98-12) 06/22/98 Mountain Mechanical, Inc. (AD98-21) 06/22/98 Nicholson, Lyle & Kelley (VA98-10) 08/10/98 Oates, Rozan (RZ98-21) 12/14/98 Parking Lot Ordinance Amendment (AD98-8) 02/23/98 Parking Lot Ordinance Amendment (AD98-8) 04/13/98 Parking Lot Ordinance Amendment (AD98-14) 04/13/98 Parking Lot Ordinance Amendment (AD98-14) 04/27/98 Pettus, Lamar & Donna (CU98-4) 02/09/98 Prestige Properties (RZA97-8) 04/13/98 Prestige Properties (RA98-5) 04/13/98 Richard Mayes Auto (RZ98-1) 01/12/98 Robbins, Larry (LS98-5 & 6) 03/09/98 41) Robertson, Butch (VA98-6) 06/22/98 Rogers, Sam (RZ98-2) 01/26/98 11110 Rogers, Sam (LS98-9) 03/23/98 Rohrbach, Terrell (CU98-16) 09/14/98 Rush, Richard (VA98-8) 07/13/98 Schmeiding Enterprises (RZ98-12) 06/22/98 Schmeiding Enterprises (LSD98-25) 09/14/98 Serenity Place, Ph II (RZA98-4) 02/09/98 Serenity Place, Ph II (RZ98-5) 02/09/98 Serenity Place, PUD (PP97-5.1) 05/11/98 Shahryar Khajehnajafi (RZ97-22.1) 01/12/98 Shahryar Khajelmalafr (RZ97-23.1) 01/12/98 Simmons First Bank (LSD98-20) 06/22/98 Skyline Drive (CU98-20) 10/26/98 Smithwick, Jim (CU98-2) 01/26/98 Staffmark II (AD98-29) 10/12/98 Stonebridge Meadows Sign (AD98-1 I) 02/23/98 Stonebridge Meadows Subdivision (AD98-11) 02/23/98 Stonebridge Meadows Subdivision - Final Plat (AD98-28) 08/24/98 Sturchio/King (RZ98-20) 11/23/98 Terminella (RZ98-19) 11/09/98 The Cliffs, Ph II (PP98-11) 12/14/98 The Dinerstein Companies (RZ98-6) 02/23/98 The Sanctuary of Fayetteville, Inc. (CU98-13) 06/22/98 The Three Sisters (AD98-26) 08/24/98 Town Creek Builders (AD98-13) 04/13/98 Transient Merchants (AD98-1) 01/26/98 Transient Merchants (AD98-1) 02/09/98 Transient Merchants (AD98-1) 02/23/98 Tune Plaza (LSD98-34) 12/14/98 Underground Utility Ordinance (AD98-30) 11/09/98 Washington Regional Medical Services (CU98-9) 05/11/98 Washington Regional Medical Services (LSD98-13) 05/11/98 Welsh (CU98-24) 11/23/98 Wendy's (AD98-18) 06/22/98 Wendy's (AD98-10) 07/21/98 West Haven Subdivision (PP98-3) 06/22/98 West Middle School (RZ98-11) 05/11/98 West Middle School (RZ98-11) 05/11/98 West Middle School (RZ98-11) 06/08/98 Whitfield, Robert (AD98-16) 05/11/98 °F° 3 A Item itr 'K. cam z ., Motion r ,:: z ',Ps ,\ Second K t t r\ k,)\ C k) v , -,, v -, , 0 tr, %,, ,, 6 Vote t MOTION P/AOPJ AriSn--• \ SECOND rlero /j GUI �i' _ \ ided 11 q .?,/ee4 (I V q bgr Aisi,,,, V( 14 i,p„e V V 7., lam. V 11 sn.1 I I I l MOTION LLLYYY J �� / 7 O (� SECOND 174/41(A0 19-, // cim Neg, Poksi• 41,,,,,,) V l q I. /' ,E,:i&, ii i v( q q mrizmin V 4- 1 (1 (1 6,tect (I li (/i I/44 v 11 \ l 'I 4 V q ti iy (72(a/2-) q y 1 v 4,„ . Lii q d -o ,,Dz, 7-1-o. Y -o -o. ' 1 / MOTION /I / SECOND IUUGvi ex (/- . ipi t clivs0A) el il A I /V:0 ui i , q 41/97/,.-6 ./ 4' gs/e5 6/ "LIA . il 1 �. Ocon-‘- (I (/( IF la -N- C A/ -Z-o. 1,-Z-0. VOTING LOG FOR PLANNING COMMISSION 3/7 /7( afreiud aid 6. `d7 L.598-5 0G. C,14•48`S MOTION Fftn�tyh�d SECOND �U/ori' Conrad Odom 1, l 7 John Watkins Y Phyllis Johnson Lorel Hoffman ,__^ Lee Ward y Gary Tucker V / Robert Reynolds V y John Forney J 7 y ea/ V SD 1) I/0 7.E., 0-0 710 ^V afreiud aid 6. `d7 5 M= sotFE tv Ire MIssa■i J _flM�I s-.+einn 111 AM aMaGiMM 111 :sinalea 1111111I • �S 2 c ■ NOME sir■■ of ■ Ni -----_■_■■■■1.1 0 ■ r■14.1144 11■■■ 111■'!"""'�'___-_ �1111.11 op � ®aNM NI iiia■■i■■■ MS MIIMM ■ 3 • In�1 mss. _ i a MIN u ION 'v.■..sa--f4ssr- smairran INN 231-M nier NM =Mr Wilr.allati.a-ca lll NM t L fl M_ L� II Ill !!i - iS.1 aktimsgs "•4 MIMIMN Mg - elks ag WarnI II II P r."11:a uU 111 a • Ilia MI Enloe eweal an a air Lngem =in . a a 0 00 • 8 8 8 CI p N CO Cal • m n • 0 m