The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-12-11 Minutesr -I L • E MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A regular meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was held on December 11, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, room 219, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES Jerry Allred, Jana Britton, John Forney, John Harbison, Gary Head, Phyllis Johnson, Charles Nickle, Conrad Odom, and Bob Reynolds Alett Little, Rich Lane, Jim Beavers, and Janet Johns Minutes of the November 11, 1995 meeting were approved as distributed. OLD BUSINESS ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 159.34 - GUARANTEES IN LIEU OF INSTALLED IMPROVEMENTS Ms. Little stated currently policy allowed only the final pavement to be bonded out. She stated the proposed ordinance would allow bonds not only on the final pavement but also on the sidewalks, landscaping, and/or tree replacement requirements. Ms. Johnson inquired regarding the procedure by which a bond or letter of credit was called. Discussion ensued. Mr. Head stated letters of credit were either revocable or irrevocable and Mr. Nickle urged the ordinance specify irrevocable letters of credit. Discussion ensued and Ms. Little stated the draft should be amended at Section 1, B (2): "...in an amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost of the remaining improvements..." Discussion ensued and Ms. Little stated the draft should be amended at Section 1, D (2): "Amend the original letter of credit to provide for any uncompleted improvements in an amount equal to 150%..." Discussion ensued regarding whether or not 150% was adequate to cover the City's exposure Mr. Head requested that the proposed ordinance be "fleshed out" regarding the letters of credit and requested that Ms. Little contact him regarding same. Discussion ensued regarding the punch list and a definition of "substantial" and whether or not the proposed ordinance should make provisions for enforcement of same and Mr. Bunn stated he felt confident the ordinance did not need to address those issues. Ms. Johnson directed staff to make the necessary corrections and additions and bring the item forward on the next agenda. 17 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 2 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 160 - FACILITIES EMITTING ODORS AS CONDITIONAL USE IN 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONES Ms. Little introduced the draft Ordinance which would make facilities which emit odors and facilities manufacturing explosives a conditional use. She stated Section 1 defined the facilities affected by the proposed ordinance. She stated Section 2 established Unit 31 - as a conditional use necessitating approval by the Planning Commission. She stated Section 3 removed several uses from Use Unit 23. She stated Section 4 created Unit 31 and listed the uses which would be governed by the proposed ordinance. She stated Section 160.101 delineates the standards by which the affected items should be considered by the Commission which include notification procedures, building inspection, and large scale development review. She stated the proposed ordinance would carry the emergency clause. Ms. Johnson suggested that textile mills be included as well as wrecking and demolition uses. Ms. Little stated textile mills were not considered to be odor eminators and wrecking/demolition operations were performed at a site and therefore would not produce odors/noise in an industrial zone. Discussion ensued regarding including noise issues in the proposed ordinance. Mr. Nickle noted there was currently an ordinance addressing the noise issues. Discussion ensued regarding whether or not the proposed ordinance strengthen regulations of the subject facilities. • Ms. Little stated that currently the facilities are approved by right and the proposed ordinance would make certain that the Planning Commission approve the subject facilities as conditional uses therefore strengthening regulations. Mr. Nickle requested amendment to Section 4 to reflection Facilities Manufacturing Explosives. 113 foil Y 11W Mr. Nickle made a motion to approve the proposed ordinance as presented and forward it to the City Council. Mr. Odom seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 7-0-0. 0 34 q • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 3 REPORT FROM PARKING INCENTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE Mr. Harbison reported the Subcommittee had held its first meeting and discussed their individual views on the Dickson Street parking situation. He invited all those interested to attend the next meeting of the subcommittee at 11:00 on December 14 at the law offices of Odom and Elliot for discussion with the Dickson Street Improvement District and at 1:00 on December 14 with the Chamber of Commerce at the law offices of Odom' and Elliot. L� C� J -2-q • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 4 CU95-38.00 - K.D. BERGER N OF DICKSON, W SIDE OF WEST ST The last item of old business was the parking waiver request from K.D. Berger for property located north of Dickson, west of West St. The property is zoned C-3, Central Business Commercial. Staff recommended a waiver (without use of other lots or shared parking) of 8 spaces and an assessment of $66,000. Mr. Harbison inquired how the assessment formula was derived. Discussion ensued. Mr. Berger contended that adequate public parking was available. Mr. Forney responded that there were differing viewpoints on parking availability. Discussion ensued. Ms. Britton stated there were a total of 67 parking spaces needed and only 4 were available on site. She stated she felt it should be a requirement that the Burlington Northern parking lot be brought into compliance with the parking lot ordinance. Discussion ensued regarding the attempts made by Mr. Berger to obtain shared parking, nonconforming parking lots, and shared parking with designated hours. Mr. Allred noted that $66,000 assessment would kill the project. I eir [$I 1114rh] • Mr. Nickle made a motion to accept 28 spaces in the Burlington Northern lot (conditioned that the parking lot be brought into compliance with the parking lot ordinance), 25 spaces in the University of Arkansas lot #53, and 22 spaces at the Westend Warehouse. Mr. Allred seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 5-3-1. Ms. Britton, Mr. Harbison, and Ms. Johnson voted against the motion and Mr. Reynolds abstained. • pyD Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 5 NEW BUSINESS PP95-23.00 - MARVIN GARDENS, PHASE I ROBERT WESTPHAL - S OF MEADNDERING WAY, W OF CROSSOVER The next item on the agenda was the preliminary plat for Marvin Gardens, phase I, submitted by Jorgenson & Associates on behalf of Robert Westphal for property located south of Meandering Way, west of Crossover Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, and contains 10.02 acres with 25 proposed lots. Staff recommended approval of the subject to: 1. Plat Review comments, including all requested easements and crossing. 2. Approval of final drainage and grading plan(s) and drainage calculations. 3. Approval of detailed plans, specifications and calculations where applicable for all public improvements including water, sewer, streets, and drainage. Further, all street designs shall be in accordance with the City of Fayetteville's "Chapter 6 - Pavement Design", pavement design standards, page 1-7, which adopts the AASHTO Guide for the Design of Pavements Structures. • 4. Addition of a permanent cul-de-sac to the west (if the street does not connect to Shadow Ridge Drive.) 5. Addition of a temporary cul-de-sac to the east with the requirement that a permanent cul-de-sac be constructed within a two year period from the filing of the final plat if the property to the east has not been developed within this two year time frame. Additionally, the developer shall post a bond for construction of the permanent cul-de-sac prior to the filing of the final plat. 6. Approval of a Final Tree Preservation Plan submitted with the final drainage/grading construction plan(s). 7. Construction of other required improvements, including sidewalks on both sides of all streets in accordance with City Ordinances, and street lights as shown and discussed at the plat review meeting. 8. Payment of Park fee. Ms. Little stated the plat had been pulled from the agenda. 341 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 6 FP95-14.00 - FINAL PLAT FOR HERITAGE VILLAGE, PHASE 1 C & B CATTLE CO., INC. - N O F WEDINGTON, W OF 54TH The next item on the agenda was the final plat for Heritage Village, Phase I, submitted by Development Consultants on behalf of C & B Cattle Co., Inc. For property located north of Wedington, west of 54th Street. The property is zoned R-1.5, Moderate Density Residential, and contains 24.67 acres with 100 lots. Staff recommended that the Commission make a determination regarding the eastern segment of Heritage Street and whether or not it would be left at 24' width or require 31' width. After resolution of the street issues, staff recommended approval subject to the following: Plat review and subdivision comments 2. Record and furnish a copy of the park land deed for the 4.25 acres. 3. Furnish a bond in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of the sidewalk construction. 4. Complete the installation of the street lights. 5. All improvements, with the exception of the bonded sidewalks shall be complete and pass the City's final inspection, including all remedial work and punchlist items prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. • 6. Compliance with all requirements of the Department of Pollution Control and Ecology regarding the chicken dump sites. 7. Construction of a permanent cul-de-sac at the north end of Heritage Avenue if no further development occurs to the north within two years from the filing of the final plat. 8. Placement of barricades at the end of Tradition Avenue and both ends of Fountain Street. 9. Payment to the City of $20,000 ($200 per lot x 100 lots) for the further development of sewer capacity in the watershed prior to the City Engineer signing the final plat. Ms. Little requested that the Commission make a determination on the street issue. Mr. Bundrick contended that no through street could be developed due to the grade of the terrain. Discussion ensued. Mr. Reynolds noted the street was complete and therefore widening same to 3 P was an undue hardship. MOTION Mr. Reynolds made a motion to approve the final plat subject to staff recommendations. Mr. Odom seconded the motion. isUpon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 8-0-1. Mr. Head abstained. • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 7 RZA95-22.10 - JED DEVELOPMENT MICHELE A. HARRINGTON - W OF DEANE SOLOMAN, N OF GOLF COURSE The next item on the agenda was the annexation request submitted by Michele A. Harrington on behalf of JED Development, Inc. for property located west of Deane Soloman Road, north of Razorback Golf Course. The request is to annex 4.59 acres. Staff recommended approval of the annexation request due to the proximity to Fayetteville City limits Ms. Johnson stated the proposal arose in connection with development to the east (Crystal Springs, Phase 1) concerning ingress/egress to the east connecting with Deane Soloman Road. Discussion ensued. Ms. Little stated minutes were distributed of the Commission meeting wherein approval of the Crystal Springs plat was addressed and wherein the decision was made to require a connection to Deane Soloman Road. Ms. Britton inquired regarding the time frame for connecting to Deane Soloman Road and whether or not it was the City's responsibility to construct same. Discussion ensued and Ms. Little stated at the time the developer begins construction of their road, the City will participate and contribute its share for same to facilitate the connection. MOTION • Mr. Head made a motion to approve the annexation. Ms. Britton seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0. 40 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 8 RZ95-39 - JED DEVELOPMENT, INC MICHELE A. HARRINGTON - W OF DEANE SOLOMAN, N OF GOLF COURSE The next item on the agenda was the rezoning request submitted by Michele A. Harrington on behalf of JED Development, Inc. for property located west of Deane Soloman Road, north of Razorback Golf Course. The request was to rezone 4.59 acres from A-1. Agricultural, to R-1, Low Density Residential. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning as consistent with the General Plan and compatible with adjacent land uses. MOTION Ms. Britton made a motion to approve the rezoning. Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0. • 0 3d • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 9 RZ95-38.00 -}( MHOON MARK FOSTER - SW CRN OF HUNTSVILLE/HAPPY HOLLOW The next item on the agenda was the request submitted on behalf of Mark Foster for Bryon Mhoon for property located at the southwest comer of Huntsville and Happy Hollow. The request is to rezone 5.03 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. Staff recommended denial of the rezoning as requested. Staff stated they would support a rezoning of the northern most section of the property to C-1 and leaving the southern section zoned R- 1. Discussion ensued regarding the single family home on the C-1 zone to the west. Mr. Jorgensen stated he was representing the applicant on the subject request. Ms. Johnson inquired if the applicant could agreed with staffs recommendation to rezoning the northern most section of the property to C-1 and leave the southern section zoned R-1. Mr. Jorgensen stated it was the applicant's position that R -O would provide a better buffer. Discussion ensued regarding the vacant gas station in the R -O zone directly across the street. Ms. Little stated staff contended there was adequate R -O zoning in the subject area and therefore opted to leave the southern section of the tract R-1. • Further discussion ensued regarding the various zones in the subject area and various options for rezoning the subject tract. (Refer to page 9.3 of the staff report.) Mr. Reynolds noted construction on a new single family home had been initiated on the property due west. MOTION Mr. Reynolds made a motion to approve staff's recommendation (refer to page 9.3 of staff report) to rezone the northern most section of the tract to C-1 and leave the southern most section zoned R-1. Mr. Head seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0. 34"6 �Ite • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 10 RZ95-40 - FREDA WISE POORE S OF HWY 62, W OF HOOT OWL The next item on the agenda was the rezoning request submitted by Freda Wise Poore for property located on the south side of highway 62, west of Hoot Owl Lane. The request is to rezone 1.61 acres from A-1, Agricultural, to C- 2, Thoroughfare Commercial. Staff recommended denial of the rezoning as requested. Staff stated they would support a zoning such as R-2 which would allow multifamily, and act as a buffer between the Smokehouse to the east and the single-family residential properties to the west. Ms. Johnson stated there had been two prior rezoning requests. The first was August, 1988 and the second July, 1994. She stated staff felt approval of the request would lead to strip zoning along Highway 62 and was not consistent with the General Plan. Ms. Little stated the parcel did adjoin an R-2 parcel to the west. Ms. Poore stated it was her opinion that residential zoning along a 5 lane corridor was not appropriate and she presented a petition in support of the requested rezoning. Discussion ensued regarding the concept of mixed use development. Ms. Little stated it was not a zoning category • but was a land use category allowing various zones and use units based on percentages in a specific area. Discussion ensued regarding various rezoning options and Ms. Poore requested the Commission's assistance in determining an appropriate zone. Ms. Little stated due to the size of the parcel, R -O would not be an appropriate zone. She stated that an adjoining tract had been rezoned to R-2 and therefore rezoning the subject tract to R-2 would be appropriate. Mr. Jimmy Benton, a resident along Highway 62 stated his support for rezoning to C-2. Discussion ensued regarding the various use units allowed in C-2, C-1, R -O, and R-2. Further discussion ensued regarding strip zoning and the 2020 General Plan. Mr. Nickle inquired as to what type of business the applicant would propose on the subject tract. Discussion ensued regarding retail use and day care facility use. MOTION Mr. Head made a motion approve the rezoning to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. Mr. Nickle seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion failed with a vote of 3-6-0. Commissioners Britton, Forney, Harbison, Johnson, Odom, and Reynolds voted against the motion. MOTION • Mr. Harbison made a motion to approve the rezoning to R -O, Residential -Office. • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 11 Mr. Allred seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 5-4-0. Commissioners, Britton, Forney, Johnson, and Odom voted against the motion. • • 01 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 12 CU95-39 - TERRY HAYES S OF 6TH, W OF LOCUST The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Terry Hayes for property located south of Sixth Street, west of Locust. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and the request is for vehicle storage (use unit 2l.) Staff recommended approval subject to: 1. No vehicle storage visible from S. School Street. t. 2. Installation of a vegetative screening along the east, and west property line to be approved by the Landscape Administrator. 3. No razor wire is allowed on any part of the fencing. 4. Entrance will be from 9th Street. 5. No storage in the section of the lot running along S. School Street. Discussion ensued regarding the tree line on the subject property which provides a natural, vegetative screen. • Mr. Young inquired if the property would be purchased or leased and Mr. Buysee stated it would be leased. Discussion ensued regarding refurbishment of Walker Park. Ms. Little stated refurbishment was underway and she added that the City's Community Development Department had Block Grants had been established for the area. Further she stated that appropriate restrictions regarding screening the storage area were paramount. Discussion ensued regarding screening measures. Ms. Little encouraged the Commission to request specific landscaping requirements and suggested that at maturity, the screen should allow for no more than 1 square foot of visibility. Discussion ensued. MOTION Mr. Allred made a motion to approve the conditional use request subject to staff recommendations. Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 7-1-0. Mr. Harbison voted against the motion. 41 54 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 13 CU95-40 - BARBARA & RANDALL WEBB E OF GREGG, S OF SUNBRIDGE The next item on the agenda was a conditional use requested submitted by Barbara & Randall Webb for property located east of Gregg, south of Sunbridge Drive. The property is zoned R -O, Residential -Office and the request is for a Plant Nursery (use unit 2.) Staff recommended approval subject to the following: I. Signage in accordance with the sign ordinance at section 158.49 limiting signs in R -O districts to 16 square feet. 2. All lighting be minimized and directed downward. 3. Compliance with the parking lot ordinance at time of large scale development. 4. Installation of appropriate screening to be decided at time of large scale development. 5. Consideration at time of large scale development of measures to achieve compliance with item 1-4 and 7 of Section 160.195 (c): Ms. Little stated the Planning Department was in receipt of 5 letters in support of the conditional use request and • same had been distributed to the Commission. Mr. Young inquired if the property was owned or leased by the applicant. Mr. Webb responded it was under contract of sale contingent upon conditional use approval. MOTION Mr. Head made a motion to approve the conditional use subject to staff recommendations. Mr. Odom seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 8-0-0. 0 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 14 CU95-41.00 - CENTRAL EMS W OF SCHOOL, S OF 6TH The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Central EMS for property located west of School, south of 6th Street. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and the request is for an Emergency Medical Station (use unit 3.) Staff recommended approval subject to the following: L The 12' by 132.35' portion of property to the north being purchased and a property line adjustment made. 2. Approval by the Board of Adjustment for a variance request from the rear setback requirements (approved 12/4/95.) 3. Compliance with Section 160.195. 4. Garage doors designed facing south to obscure visibility of the ambulances while parked in the bays. Mr. Hickerson stated the applicant had lost their lease and wanted to locate'in the subject area. He added a site had been obtained near the Aldi's store for another facility. He noted they had a contract of sale on the property to the north and the Board of Adjustment had approved theirvariance request. He agreed to the southerly orientation of • the parking bay doors. MOTION Mr. Allred made a motion to approve the request subject to staff recommendations. Mr. Odom seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 8-0-0. 11 Mao 351 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 15 CU95-42 - DR. LUKE KNOX E OF HWY 265, N OF OAK BAILEY The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Dr. Luke Knox for property located east of Highway 265, north of Oak Bailey Road. The property is zoned R-1.5, Moderate Density Residential, and the request is for a Martial Arts Studio (use unit 4.) Staff recommended approval subject to the following: 1. Signage in accordance with the sign ordinance. 2. Building height shall not exceed 30'. 3. All lighting be minimized and directed downward. 4. Compliance with the parking lot ordinance at time of large scale development. 5. Installation of appropriate screening to be decided at time of large scale development. 6. Compliance with Section 160.195. 7. Large scale development review which will assure compliance with the drainage is ordinance and the tree ordinance. Ms. Johnson noted the property consisted of 16 acres and the center would include an open workout area with offices, reception area, and locker rooms. She stated the hours of operation would be from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with a total of 150 clients and 6 employees. Further she noted the property was surrounded by A- I zone except to the west which is R-2. Mr. Skyles, architect, was present to represent the applicant. Mr. Young inquired if the subject property was owned or leased by the applicant and Mr. Skyles stated the applicant owns the property. Ms. Britton objected to the requested. Discussion ensued regarding the Williams Center and issues involving a similar type business. Ms. Skyles responded that the Williams Center had over 1000 clients and had a much greater impact on the neighborhood. He stated the lot was heavily wooded and would be completely shielded from the road. Discussion ensued regarding the site plan, traffic issues including ingress/egress, and tree preservation. Dr. Windburn, a resident on Old Wire Road, spoke in opposition to the conditional use. Mr. Allred inquired if additional buildings would be allowed without the matter coming back to the Commission. Ms. Little stated all development would be subject to large scale development review. • Mr. Reynolds inquired if the General Plan provided for this type of facility in the subject area and Ms. Little stated the area was designated as R-1.5 and required conditional use for the requested use unit. Discussion ensued. Planning Commission Minutes • December 11, 1995 Page 16 MOTION Mr. Reynolds made a motion to deny the conditional use. Mr. Head seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 8-0-0. • C1 J 3 ;� Al "41 • Planning Commission Minutes December 11, 1995 Page 17 RZ95-41 - CALHOUN-BARRE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SE CRN OF HWY 265 & OLD WIRE ROAD The next item on the agenda was the rezoning request submitted by Calhoun -Barre Development Corporation for property located at the southeast comer of Highway 265 and Old Wire Road. The request is to rezone 6.55 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential to R-2, Medium Density Residential. Staff recommended approval of the R-2 zone for the tract as consistent with the General Plan 2010. Ms. Little presented a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Crandel in opposition to the proposed rezoning (copy on file in Planning Department.) She stated a prospectus booklet had been distributed by the applicants. Discussion ensued regarding the prospectus, survey, and flood plane. Ms. Harrington gave a brief overview of both the requested rezonings. She stated the reason the request was submitted in two parts was because there were two different zones (6.55 acres of R-1 and 1.8 acres of A-1) both tracts were requested to be rezoned R-2, Medium Density. She distributed photographs depicting the type of development. She stated they were aware of and would comply with the Drainage and Grading Ordinance and Tree Ordinance. She offered a Bill of Assurance for 180 units. Mr. Mark Crandel, an adjoining property owner, spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning citing issues of density and neighborhood character. • Dr. Windburn, a resident in the subject area, spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning citing issues of flooding, traffic, and density. Ms. Calloway, a resident in the subject area, spoke in support of the proposed rezoning. She expressed concern regarding flooding and traffic. Ms. Lee, a resident in the subject area, spoke in opposition of the proposed rezoning citing issues of flooding, traffic, and school overcrowding along with traffic. Mr. Remedy, a resident in the subject area, spoke is support of the proposed rezoning. He stated he had vehemently opposed previous rezoning requests. Mr. Wahls, a resident in the subject area, spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning. He expressed concern over flooding. Mr. Wright, a resident in the subject area, spoke in opposition to the proposed rezoning citing issues with the proposed intensity of development. Ms. Remedy, a resident in the subject area, spoke in support of the proposed rezoning. Ms. Little stated drainage issues would need to be addressed at the preliminary plat review. She stated traffic counts had recently been done and signalizing of intersections (Skillern & Old Wire) would be considered. Ms. Harrington reiterated that the R-2 zone would be an excellent buffer. • Discussion ensued regarding developing the subject area under Planned Urban Development regulations. Ms. Little noted the density would be the same as allowed under R-2 zoning and the major difference was the 30% greenspace requirement. She stated PUD's encourage clustering. Planning Commission Minutes • December 11, 1995 Page 18 Mr. Forney inquired if the developers would consider amending their request to R1.5 and Ms. Harrington responded that due to cost factors the project would not be feasible at that density. Mr. Reynolds stated that previous requests had been denied for office or neighborhood commercial development therefore the only option left would be a residential category. Discussion ensued regarding various residential zoning options. MOTION Mr. Odom made a motion to approve the rezoning request RZ95-41 subject to staff comments and bill of assurance for a maximum of 180 units.. Mr. Allred seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 5-2-1. Ms. Britton and Mr. Reynolds voted against the motion and Mr. Head abstained. • 0 Planning Commission Minutes is December I1, 1995 Page 19 RZ95-42 - CALHOUN-BARRE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION EAST OF HWY 265, S OF OLD WIRE The next item on the agenda was the rezoning request submitted by Calhoun -Barre Development Corporation for property located east of Highway 265, south of Old Wire Road. The request was to rezone 1.8 acres from A-1, Agricultural, to R-2, Medium Density Residential. Staff recommended approval of the request. MOTION Mr. Allred made a motion to approve the rezoning request RZ95-42. Mr. Odom seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 5-2-1. Ms. Britton and Mr. Reynolds voted against the motion and Mr. Head abstained. is 40 X55 Planning Commission Minutes • December I I, 1995 Page 20 PLANNING COMMISSION BY-LAW AMENDMENT The next item on the agenda was a proposed amendment to the Commission By -Laws to establish a procedure for rehearings. Ms. Johnson advised the amendment would be considered on the next agenda.. Discussion ensued regarding City Council disclosure of property ownership. Ms. Johnson stated the letter included in the packet was for informational purposes only. Discussion ensued regarding an upcoming parking waiver at 318 W. Dickson Street (Guido's.) Ms. Little stated the proposed parking waiver was for informational purposes only and would be considered on the next agenda. Ms. Little further stated that Alderman Williams had directed staff to work on an ordinance for community development standards which may entail establishing additional overlay districts. Ms. Little also stated the Council had directed staff to perform a study of signs and entrances within the highway right of ways. She stated this would entail a considerable amount of work. • Ms. Little stated that at the last Commission meeting the decision was made not to forward an ordinance requiring conditional use approval for commercial ventures with outdoor music. In the interim, the City Council has requested that the proposed ordinance be placed on their agenda for consideration at their meeting on December 12, 1995. Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. 0 M PAIINING mrnmissicm • VOTING LOG FOR IZ 11 9S • i'U.0 Q MOTION SECOND ALLRED y15 BRITTON l r=s \� FORNEY HARBISON �f J HEAD y{c �! JOHNSON NICKLE \��S ODOM REYNOLDS i'U.0 Q I -Mall G wrw r3s1on1 • VOTING LOG FOR IZ 1 l 9 CJ • N07 sc b �sIZZdY 0 MOTION NICU f= �(N0� Wap atT(CN SECOND ALLRED \/ BRITTON FORNEY HARBISON HEAD 1 �iAIN JOHNSON I 1 V \ r NICKLE ODOM LL �I REYNOLDSI� 53I i3-0-1 9-0-0 0 �RANQNS 02)Mn1 iSSIGN • VOTING LOG FOR IZ 1 I 195 XN 4 lol- ANJ • • 0 MOTION U tikrjL S I p4D HAn3tsN Au� SECONDfl Gn f I ICE ALLY �waam ALLRED \ % BRITTON Q� FORNEY V ^ I HARBISON N HEAD JOHNSON NICKLE \ ODOM 1 REYNOLDS �I 0 (RANI. imc- Corn tssoN . VOTING LOG FOR IZ I • w .II. . � ,v MOTION t l �rfawos SECOND Cooly Vokom 14044 ALLez ALLRED / y BRITTON Y Y Y FORNEY y HARBISON y y HEAD JOHNSON I y NICKLE ---- �- ODOM . Y REYNOLDS y y w PIA ukru mfYbl1'l ISS lG N • VOTING LOG FOR _ • • ;)-G - 1 070 MOTION SECOND �YYI ALLRED BRITTON n FORNEY HARBISON HEAD JOHNSON NICKLE ODOM REYNOLDS ;)-G - 1 070