HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-10-23 MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
• FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was held on October 23, 1995 at 5:30 p.m. in the City
Administration Buildling, 113 West Mountain, Room 219, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry Allred, Jana Britton, John Forney, John Harbison,
Gary Head, Phyllis Johnson, Charles Nickle, Conrad Odom,
and Bob Reynolds.
STAFF PRESENT: Don Bunn, Rich Lane, Alett Little, Janet Johns, and Beth
Sandeen
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of September 11, 1995 meeting were approved as distributed.
The minutes of the regular meeting of September 25, 1995 meeting were approved as distributed.
The minutes of the special meeting of October 5, 1995 were approved as distributed.
•
0
��
•
Planning Commission Minutes
• October 23, 1995
Page 2
OLD BUSINESS
REZONING R95-24 - NANCHAR AMD MARJORIE S. BROOKS
E OF GREGG ST, N OF US71 BYPASS, W OF 71 BUSINESS
The first item on the agenda was the request to rezone 59.48 acres from A-1 Agricultural and R-1, Low Density
Residential to R -O, Residential Office.
REZONING R95-25 - NANCHAR AND MARJORIE S. BROOKS
E OF GREGG ST, N OF US71 BYPASS, W OF 71 BUSINESS
In conjunction with R95-24, the next item on the agenda was the request to rezone 10.61 acres from A-1
Agricultural to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial and 30.07 acres from A-1 Agricultural and R-1 Low Density
Residential to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial with restrictions totaling 40.68 acres.
REZONING R95-25.1 - NANCHAR AND MARJORIE S. BROOKS
E OF GREGG ST, N OF US71 BYPASS, W OF 71 BUSINESS
In conjunction with R95-24 and R95-25, the next item on the agenda was the request to rezone 200.62 acres from
A-1 Agricultural to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and 8.99 acres from A-1, Agricultural to C-2, Thoroughfare
Commercial with restrictions totaling 209.61 acres.
is
Ms. Johnson stated she had requested that staff include the rezoning request on the agenda because of the discussion
at the City Council meeting of October 3, 1995.
Ms. Little stated the Council had not requested any further action from the Planning Commission.
0
3VI
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 3
BUSINESS
CONDITIONAL USE CU95-34 - SUZIE STEPHENS
NIBBLES - LEE AVENUE
The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Suzie Stephens for property located at the
northeast comer of Lee and Bertha Streets (part of Lot 29 & all of Lot 30 in Maple Crest Addition.) The property is
zoned R -O and the request is for a conditional use under use unit 13 - eating places to permit a catering service.
Staff recommended approval of the conditional use request contingent upon the following conditions:
1. Signage be in accordance with the sign ordinance at Section 158.49 limiting signs in
R -O districts to 16 square feet.
2. All lighting be minimized, directed downward, and so situated to minimize its impact
on existing single-family residences.
3. Compliance with parking lot ordinance.
4. Installation of appropriate screening.
Ms. Little stated that the refuse area and required utilities will be addressed at the time the building permit is issued.
Ms. Britton inquired as the required amount of parking and how same was derived. Mr. Lane stated the number of
required parking spaces was 10 and same was computed from the parking lot ordinance under retail use unit
Ms. Stephens agreed to comply with the staff recommendations.
MOTION
Mr. Head made a motion to approve the conditional use subject to staff recommendations.
Mr. Odom seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
,/0
4 /1
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 4
CONDITIONAL USE CU95-35 - BILL GRAUE
E OF STONE BRIDGE, S OF WYMAN ROAD
The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Bill Graue for property located east of
Stone Bridge, south of Wyman Road. The property is zoned R-1 and the request is for a conditional use to allow
tandem lot development.
Staff recommended approval of the split subject to the following:
1. Approval of the administrative lot line adjustments.
2. No change in the street right of way dedication on the west side of the subdivision.
3. Adjustments as necessary of the utilities serving the lots.
4. The dedication of any easements made necessary by the lot line adjustments.
Discussion ensued regarding Mr. Graue's development plans. He stated there was 25 feet right of way and a 10 feet
easement on the west side of the property and he was requesting a tandem lot because if would be easier to build on
the site.
Discussion ensued regarding access to the lot. Ms. Johnson stated Lot 1 would be accessed from Wyman Road and
• Lot 4 with the existing house would be accessed from Highway 16.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not the lots would meet the required buildable area requirements in light of
the right of way and easements. Ms. Little stated staff could ascertain that at the time building permits were issued
and if those requirements could not be met then the tandem lot approval would be nullified.
Mr. Nickle inquired as to whether or not the private drive was required to be paved and Mr. Bunn stated that under
the code provisions 15 feet was required to be paved.
Ms. Britton inquired regarding access on the east side of the property. Discussion ensued.
MOTION
Mr. Allred made a motion to approve the conditional use request subject to staff recommendations. Further he
motion that if recommendation two could not be met the result would be nullification of the conditional use
approval.
Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
9
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 5
CONDITIONAL USE CU95-36 - ALNIC TRUST (KWIKIT)
JIM WRAY - 2350 WEDINGTON
The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Alnic Trust (Kwikit) for property located
east of Porter Road, on the north side of Wedington (2350 Wedington.) The property is zoned R -I and the request
is for a conditional use to permit limited neighborhood commercial development.
Staff recommended approval of the conditional use on the basis that it would provide that the "neighborhood feel'
of the area would be maintained, that it would ensure that the commercial use is compatible in size, scale, massing,
and residential appearance with adjoining and surrounding residential uses, and it would bring a nonconforming use
into compliance.
Regarding the schedule AHTD project on Wedington, Mr. Head inquired as to the effect same would have on the
location of the pumps and Mr. Wray stated the pumps would stay in the same position.
Ms. Britton expressed concern regarding the location of the high growing shrub species on the east. Ms. Little
stated the view triangle should be maintained.
Ms. Johnson inquired regarding the difference between the existing pavement square footage and the proposed
pavement square footage. Ms. Little stated the square footage would triple amounting to 16,855.22 square feet of
• pavement. Discussion ensued.
Ms. Britton inquired regarding building materials and Mr. Crook, Trustee stated siding would be used.
Ms. Britton inquired regarding canopy height and Ms. Little stated that would be regulated by the inspection
department and would be built to code.
MOTION
Mr. Head made a motion to approve the conditional use subject to staff recommendations and preservation of the
view triangle to the east.
Ms. Britton seconded the motion.
Mr. Forney inquired as to the parking formula and Ms. Little stated l I spaces were the maximum allowable.
Mr. Head amended his motion to approve the conditional use subject to staff recommendations, preservation of the
view triangle to the east, and limiting the number of parking spaces to 11.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
11
3 t2
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 6
CONDITIONAL USE CU95-37 - ED DAGGETT
2623 N. GREGG
The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Ed Daggett for property located at 2623
N. Gregg. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential, and the request is for a conditional use to allow
tandem lot development.
Staff recommended approval of the conditional use for a tandem lot on the basis that development of the U of A
Experimental Farm to the west and railroad to east prevented normal access routes.
Discussion ensued.
MOTION
Mr. Allred made a motion to approve the conditional use.
Mr. Reynold seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
LOT SPLIT LS95-35 - ED DAGGETT
• 2623 N. GREGG
The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by Ed Daggett for property located at 2623
N. Gregg. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential, and the request is for a lot split to create a new
lot of 1.65 acres and a,remaining parcel of 8.08 acres.
Staff recommended approval of the lot split.
1331471 iif43i;l
Mr. Reynolds made a motion to approve the lot split.
Mr. Odom seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
•
31.,
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 7
CONDITIONAL USE CU95-38 - K.D. BERGER
325 AND 347 NORTH WEST AVENUE
The next item on the agenda was the conditional use request submitted by K.D. Berger for property located at 325
and 347 North West Avenue (north of Dickson, on the west side of West Street.) The property is zoned C-3,
Central Business Commercial, and the request is for a conditional use to permit a parking waiver of 63 spaces.
Staff did not make a recommendation but prepared an issue paper which addressed the redevelopment of the
Dickson Street District, historical analysis of previous waivers granted in the subject area, affect of the parking lot
ordinance on the subject conditional use request, and criteria for granting the subject parking waiver.
Ms. Little presented an amended letter from University Baptist Church making their adjacent parking lots available
to the applicant at specified hours and she requested that consideration be given to assessment fees for parking
spaces waived. Discussion ensued.
Mr. Mark Sugg made a statement regarding the parking situation in the Dickson Street area
Mr. Berger presented photos of the building on the subject tract and a survey of parking availability in the area. He
stated that since he had filed his application he had attained commitments for 160 spaces and presented a
commitment letter for 28 parking space located at the old Burlington Northern Railroad Terminal, limited hours of
• parking for 22 spaces located at 339 N. West Avenue from Crossbrooks Graphics, Inc., and limited hours of parking
for 36 spaces located at 325 and 347 N. West Avenue from the Arkansas Archeological Survey.
Discussion of the parking agreements ensued. Regarding the UBC commitment letter, Ms. Johnson noted that the
agreement did not specifically guarantee any parking spaces. Regarding the Burlington Northern Railroad Terminal
parking, Mr. Forney inquired regarding whether or not the gravel lot would be required to be developed to the
parking lot ordinance and Ms. Little stated that it would need to be paved. Discussion ensued. Regarding the
Arkansas Archeological Survey, Mr. Harbison inquired as to whether or not the signature was an authorized agent
who could convey the parking spaces on behalf of the University of Arkansas.
Discussion ensued regarding various waivers which were granted in the subject area and the planning department's
efforts to track the agreements. Specifically, Ms. Little noted that the City had spent around $2.5 million on parking
in the area.
MOTION
Mr. Forney made a motion to postpone the parking waiver.
Ms. Britton seconded the motion.
Upon roll
call, the
motion passed with
a vote of 7-1-1. Mr.
Head voted no and Mr. Reynolds abstained on the
basis that
he was a
property owner in
the subject area.
Ms. Johnson directed the staff to provide more information on assessment fees for waived parking spaces and to
collect and analysis data on parking commitments.
• Ms. Little stated staff would also contact the Walton Arts Center and the Dickson Street Improvement District
requesting that they report on the parking situation in the area.
3/C
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 8
LOT SPLIT LS95-34 - HUGH MAHAFFEY
3531 DINSMORE TRAIL
The next item on the agenda was the lot split request submitted by Hugh Mahaffey for property located at 3531
Dinsmore Trail. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural and the request is for a lot split to create a new lot of 2
acres and a remaining lot of 23.75 acres.
Staff recommended approval of the lot split subject to the granting of an additional 5 feet of street right of way off
of each side of the existing Dinsmore Trail right of way.
Ms. Little presented an aerial map of the subject area. She stated the sign had originally been posted at the wrong
location but the error had been corrected and she felt as if proper notification requirements had been met.
Ms. Mahaffey agreed to grant the additional right of way.
MOTION
Mr. Head made a motion to approve the lot split subject to the staff recommendation.
Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion.
• Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
0
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 9
LOT SPLIT LS95-37 - DAN EPPERLY
2525 MT. COMFORT ROAD
The next item on the agenda was the lot split request submitted by Dan Epperly for property located at 2525 Mt.
Comfort Road. The property is zoned R- 1, Low Density Residential and the request is for a lot split to create a new
lot of .52 acres and a remaining lot of 1.23 acres.
This item was withdrawn from the agenda.
E
0
MR
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 10
LOT SPLIT LS95-26 - ANDRE MARC
4185 CANVAS MOUNTAIN ROAD
The next item on the agenda was the lot split request submitted by Andre Marc for property located at 4185 Canvas
Mountain Road. The property is located outside the City Limits, and the request is for a lot split to create a new lot
of 1.48 acres and a remaining lot of 1.48 acres.
Staff recommended the lot splits be approved subject to the following:
1. Approval of Washington County.
2. Granting of septic tank permits by the County Health Department.
3. No prohibition of lot splits by the existing subdivision covenants or property
owner 7s association agreements.
Mr. Bunn stated his office was in receipt of the approval by the Washington County Planning Board, perk test
results allowing septic systems on the subject tracts, and he stated there were
no prohibition of lot splits in the covenants and POA agreements.
Ms. Little requested copies of the documents on file in engineering supporting the fulfilment of staff
• recommendations.
MOTION
Mr. Head made a motion to approve the lot split.
Mr. Odom seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
0
;11
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 11
PRELIMINARY PLAT PP95-20 - PINE VALLEY, PHASE IV
BMP DEVELOPMENT, INC. - S OF MT COMFORT, E OF WOODFIELD
The next item on the agenda was the preliminary plat for Pine Valley, Phase IV, submitted by Northwest Engineers
on behalf of BMP Development, Inc. For property located south of Mt. Comfort, east of Woodfield. The property
is zoned R-2 and contains 3.05 acres with 8 proposed lots.
Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following:
1. Plat Review and Subdivision Committee comments;
2. Approval of a Tree Preservation Plan;
3. Approval of the detailed plans for public improvements;
4. Approval of a Drainage and Grading Plan;
5. Construction of sidewalks;
6. Contribution of bridge costs of $480 per duplex; and
• 7. Contribution of off-site sewer improvements of $200 per lot.
Discussion ensued regarding the tree preservation plan and Ms. Sandeen stated it was included on the drainage and
grading plan and had met the requirements.
Discussion ensued regarding the agreement of the street location and park land dedication. Ms. Little noted 15 acres
had been dedicated as park land and she expressed her appreciation of the generosity of the developer, Mr. Mark
Marquess.
Mr. Jones inquired as to the location of the sidewalk and reduced street width. Discussion ensued regarding various
options for same. Ms. Little amended the staff recommendation to reflect the following:
5. Construction of sidewalks along lots 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 and entirely around the culdesac;
8. Reduction of street with Marigold and the unnamed street to the culdesac to 26 feet. The
north bound stub out should remain 31 feet.
Mr. Bunn made clarification to staff recommendation 6 and 7. (Tape change prevented recordation of specific
amendment to the recommendation. Contact engineering regarding same.)
10 WI 11
Ms. Britton made a motion to approve the preliminary plat subject to amended staff recommendations including
sidewalk on both sides of the street and a reduced street width of 26' from Merigold to the culdesac.
Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion.
• Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
, )q
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 12
PRELIMINARY PLAT PP95-21 - WEDINGTON PLACE
N OF WEDINGTON, W OF HWY 71 BYPASS, E OF SALEM
The next item on the agenda was the preliminary plat for Wedington Place submitted by Clary Development
Corporation on behalf of Geneva McFarland, et al for property located north of Wedington, west of Hwy. 71
Bypass, east of Salem. The property is zoned C-2 and contains 32.36 acres with 2 proposed lots.
Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following:
1. Plat Review and Subdivision Committee comments;
2. Payment of $1,500 per acre as a contribution to the construction of bridges on Salem
Road and Shiloh Drive;
3. Approval of a grading and drainage plan for the site;
4. Payment of off-site sewer improvement costs equivalent to $200.00 per residential lot;
5. Conformance in all respects to the requirements of the Overlay District;
6. Subsequent approval of specific large scale developments on each of the lots; and,
• 7. Construction of sidewalks along Wedington.
Mr. Bunn clarified staff recommendation #2 stating that bridge construction contributions would be $1500 per
commercial acre and $800 per residential lot which would be due prior to approval of the final plat.
Regarding sewer improvement costs, Ms. Little noted the assessment for a commercial lot would be less than the
$200 per residential lot but that a fee would be charge for sewer improvement in connection with commercial lot
development which would a due prior to approval of the final plat.
Discussion ensued regarding an alleged agreement with the subject developer to construct a fifth lane at the Joyce
Street and Highway 71 intersection. Mr. Bunn stated the construction was implied but not a condition of the Spring
Creek development.
Mr. Robert Brown representing DCI Engineers and Mr. Jeff Maxwell representing Clary Development agreed to
comply with the staff recommendations.
Mr. Harbison inquired regarding a tree preservation plan. Ms. Sandeen responded that some trees had been
removed to facilitate an access easement and same would be covered in the replacement canopy requirement. Mr.
Harbison requested the staff recommendations reflect approval of a tree preservation plan as recommendation #8.
Mr. Allred inquired if the access point issue had been resolved since Subdivision Committee meeting. Ms. Little
stated it had been surveyed and the revised plat reflect compliance with the code requirements. Additionally she
stated there would be one ingress/egress point per lot from the proposed street and the throat would accommodate
three cars.
• Discussion ensued regarding proposed street alignments and connections. Ms. Little stated those would be
discussed in detail during subsequent large scale development plans. Further discussion ensued. Ms. Britton
suggested requested 50 feet right of way on the west side for street connections. Discussion ensued. Mr. Brown
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 13
agreed to provide a connection to Timberline. Discussion ensued.
MOTION
Mr. Reynolds made a motion to postpone approval of the preliminary plat until street alignment and connectivity
could be worked out.
Ms. Johnson seconded the motion.
Discussion ensued and Mr. Brown agreed to provide access but stated without firm commitments and contracts for
sale of land he was hesitant to agree to locations and dedication of street right of way.
Upon roll call, the
motion passed with a vote of 6-3-0.
Mr. Allred,
Mr. Nickle, and
Mr. Odom voted against
the motion.
is
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 14
LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT LSD95-36 - CAR MART
BILL FLEEMAN - N OF HWY 629 W OF 71 BYPASS
The next item on the agenda was the large scale development for Car Mart submitted by WBR Engineering on
behalf of Bill Fleeman for property located north of Highway 62, west of 71 Bypass. The property is zoned C-2 and
contains 1.52 acres.
Staff recommended approval of the large scale development subject to the following:
1. Plat Review and Subdivision Committee comments;
2. Submittal of a Grading and Drainage Plan prior to any construction activities;
3. Approval of the Tree Preservation Plan;
4. Two curb cuts providing two lane ingress and one lane egress (220 feet between cuts); and,
5. Construction of a 5 feet sidewalk along Highway 62.
Ms. Little stated the applicant was in disagreement with recommendation #4. Mr. Fleeman stated he would prefer
two lane ingress and two lane egress. Discussion ensued.
` Regarding recommendation #3, Ms. Sandeen stated she had received a complaint that trees were removed from the
site prior to issuance of a grading and drainage plan. Upon investigation, she stated the applicant, a Rogers resident,
was unaware of the tree ordinance and he had informed her the trees that were removed were diseased. She stated
she had contacted the Prosecuting Attorney as provided in the tree ordinance and was informed that without
documentation there was no proof that a crime had been committed. Further she stated that she was satisfied that
the tree ordinance had been met and the situation remedied as per ordinance with the proposed replacement canopy.
Ms. Mormon made a statement urging the Commission to pursue enforcement of the tree ordinance.
Mr. Reynolds stated he had witnessed the tree removal and stated that ignorance was no excuse for disobeying the
law.
Mr. Fleeman apologized to the Commission.
Discussion ensued regarding enforcement procedures as provided under the tree ordinance and Ms. Sandeen stated
the ordinance provided two remedies: replacement canopy and referral to the City Prosecutor.
MOTION
Mr. Allred made a motion to approve the large scale development subject to staff recommendations.
Ms. Britton seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 8-1-0. Mr. Reynolds voted against the motion.
0
Re
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 15
WAIVER WA95-4 - JULIAN ARCHER
NW CORNER OF SANG AND HASKELL
The next item on the agenda was the waiver request submitted by Julian Archer for property located at the
northwest comer of Sang and Haskell. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, and the request is for a
waiver of the Subdivision Regulations.
Staff recommended denial of the request for waiver on street improvements.
Staff recommended denial of the request for waiver on sidewalk requirements.
WAIVER WA95-5 - JULIAN ARCHER
HALSELL HEIGHTS - E OF CROSS AVENUE
The next item on the agenda was the waiver request submitted by Julian Archer for property located on Halsell
Heights, east of Cross Avenue. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, and the request is for a waiver
of the Subdivision Regulations.
Staff recommended denial of the request for waiver on street improvements.
Staff recommended denial of the request for waiver on sidewalk requirements
• With regarding to waiver of street improvements, Mr. Bunn clarified that the recommendation was for a
contribution in lieu of actual construction of the street and same would be refunded after 5 years if the City had not
made the recommended improvements. Mr. Bunn stated staff would agree to the sidewalk being outside of the
street right of way to preserve the trees if the City was granted an easement and same should be constructed
immediately.
Mr. Archer contended the recommended street improvements were not scheduled improvements and the sidewalk
requirements would ruin the neighborhood character. Further Mr. Archer alleged that he had researched lot splits
for the previous year and no other applicant had been required to perform improvements.
Mr. Williams presented a petition supporting the request for waiver of the sidewalks.
Mr. Glen Adams residing at the comer of Haskell Heights and Sang made a statement supporting the request for
waiver of the sidewalks.
Ms. Connie Cramer former resident of Markham Hill and speaking on behalf of Julie Rogers who owns property on
Cross Avenue made a statement supporting the request for waiver of the
sidewalks.
Mr. Cyrus Sutherland, neighbor to the subject area, made a statement supporting the request for waiver of the
sidewalks.
Mr. William Feldman, neighbor of the subject area, expressed his concern that the recommended improvements
would ruin the neighborhood's character.
• Mr. Nickle inquired as to the cost of the recommended improvements and Mr. Archer responded his engineer had
figured $12,000.
• Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 16
Discussion ensued regarding bonding and Bills of Assurance
MOTION
Mr. Harbison made a motion to waive the sidewalk under request WA95-4.
Mr. Forney seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion failed with a vote of 2-7-0. Mr. Allred, Ms. Britton, Mr. Head, Ms. Johnson, Mr.
Nickle, Mr. Odom, and Mr. Reynolds voted against the motion.
Discussion ensued.
MOTION
Ms. Britton made a motion to deny waiver WA95-4.
Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 9-0-0.
• MOTION
Ms. Britton made a motion to deny wavier WA95-5.
Mr. Nickle seconded the motion.
Upon roll call, the motion passed with a unanimous vote of 8-1-0. Mr. Harbison voted against the motion.
•
�T
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1995
Page 17
ORDINANCE MAKING PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION EFFECTIVE FIFTEEN (15) DAYS AFTER
APPROVAL
Ms. Little presented the ordinance and discussion ensued.
Mr. Young spoke supporting and justifying the need for the ordinance. Discussion ensued.
No action was taken.
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 159.34 - GUARANTEES IN LIEU OF INSTALLED
IMPROVEMENTS
Ms. Little presented the ordinance and Mr. Young made a statement supporting and justifying the need for such an
ordinance. Discussion ensued.
No action was taken.
ORDINANCE MAKING FACILITIES EMITTING ODORS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE I-2, HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL ZONES
Ms. Little presented the ordinance and discussion ensued.
• No action was taken.
ORDINANCE MAKING FACILITIES PROVIDING OUTDOOR MUSIC A CONDITIONAL USE IN ANY
PERMITTED ZONE
Ms. Little presented the ordinance and stated she felt the new ordinance fully addressed the issue of outdoor music.
No action was taken.
•
0
`'LANAI A& COrnr oI
VOTING LOG FOR (0/23/95
N
� � Q
N
I If
MOTION
SraF�� suN�,
UITLE 1u#,I
ANO LAI1E
SECOND
ALLRED�
N
BRITTONEtil
Q
FORNEY
%
HARBISON
jam_,r
Q
HEAD
JOHNSON
NICKLE
v
0
UL
a
ODOM
REYNOLDS
I -T
•
•
•
RAtiuiuG COmmisstcxi
VOTING LOG FOR 10/23
h � �
0
ry
Al F� m
� ��-
•
�..q•,..�2 ■�
d
MOTION
I
Ill? -D
4cAc)
{i ll a-�,
SECOND
ACCRED
BRITTON
ES
Y�
�j
YDS
FORNEY
YES
yes
Y�
HARBISON
YES
Y�
HEAD
JOHNSON
YES
Yes
NICKLE
ODOM
REYNOLDS
Y�5
v
YES
YE�S
q_n_n 91.0 0 9•0•O 9.0.0
•
�..q•,..�2 ■�
d
QAIKwWi c mmissou
• VOTING LOG FOR 18�Z3 �5
•
CI
m
v-
f
MOTION
rr::gK "
Fc mN
�1
Hen
SECOND
Oco I
J rfmo
IJ
\
r�I.IG�
Otrm
ALLRED
YES
BRITTON
FORNEY
HARBISON
\ /�
\/ES
HEAD
IA
JOHNSON
v
\/FS
NICKLE
I-�-
�%
`/es
ODOM
\ /e5
REYNOLDS
Yes
AeST4t 15
\/E-5
9.0.0 7+1 1 9 0 0 9.0.0
m
•
0
RAQQlmG CO17M sS1oN
VOTING LOG FOR IG
CC
J�
MOTION
BE)
&sm
SECOND
ALLRED
YES
No
YES
BRITTON
FORNEY
YL
HARBISON
vels
Y
HEAD
YIES
\,k
JOHNSON
yr=s
NICKLE
yts.
n o
ODOM
�/
No
REYNOLDS
�1^�
•
•
rIAmkvm& (2�mmissioN
VOTING LOG FOR IO/z 5
Z^
'v Lq
MOTION
p
�V a
SECOND
ACCRED
BRITTON
No
FORNEY
\ /
\ I�
ve5
HARBISON
HEAD
I�
JOHNSON
NICKLE
ODOM
REYNOLDS
Nb
\ks
VIES
9.0^ S•1.0
MSM nEKKD Dal GD
whver
L
•
PLANNaItG C1'11%Ssick
VOTING LOG FOR 10/Z3S
0
OR
MOTION
SECOND
ALLRED
BRITTON
Z
FORNEY
111
HARBISON
HEAD
JOHNSON
NICKLE
ODOM
REYNOLDS
OR
•
•
E
f q9 AWmc, comm(Ssioi
VOTING LOG FOR 4 9
61
v
�
MOTION
SECOND
ALLRED
BRITTON
FORNEY
HARBISON
HEAD
JOHNSON
O
NICKLE
ODOM
REYNOLDS
61