Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-03-27 - Agendas - Final (L ? N nn. 4 .1 housfesmoRWARIFe thEylare Made'lrorn Wa ;on FEW, I 1., 4 H&Wwf 4u T 71 Ds v a - ien I V.15 Ne' .100 T6 Mfiiridng ews . o: tlw,7,�V u s1whave-t W -k *bl - Vith 0 Vit West Airk I. oa OW. co 0 si I O,TT M, a ar 2811 me I of. DU11 ng wasfmocuo­�, 1 11 1,Vft LOU W ' iiiii" tl&I;they TjUSL De" yop compati blliI. 'get ddwnsfui the col6or �.,'Wben,we I ri M66md ' think wWie really, -Jittle too IT e Morning II,744W�­ �-,l I-I If-I- g'a ACOmoo;'! strIngeilt in our ordinancef" said c6m. FayedeVille,.,Plinning isiiohm&6ibeAMbAdaY'I 11 , even" missiond Jerry ing-scht on to I the Cityo6u a ., I ribil ' ( I Tbi. ordinance would also address .1 Ile I �:re�ornmepndat" jgj* 'I building massing and building mater- �- roa4. . I I sed " irdinan' _,.4atZ 4 . iali; 1 '11 Alest propo :oo ce Eiihied ...location of ,parkirig,'.1 tff* trash and screening-, signs; the siie of providing limited. neighbdihoodor, 4 . ivindows and d commercial development in resi-j.,% oors; rhaterials; colors ,ciialuii.I Ind teittur6s- 'of.' buildin 'gs;" anld dential areas as a conditi Uses,i proposed , include zpermI lighting". s Vial se rvic�es such as-%ohair' Planners alsovoted to send back to o saloni, dry cicanir�g shops and the subdivision committee4or-more day-6aie..�,seryices; specialized Vork .the proposed preliminary. plat i'at 1114. . � ICZII, - I of - retaWservices . suclivas antique,. 4 for -Bois-De-Arc subdioifisi6fi'Iuntil -.bakenesf:o 11 shops, I book ., stores; , delicatessens, rgrocery I . stores,I - planners can further study a Proposed requirement fr6m staff that hard- , MapIF SL apptiance-repair shopi:,; IMN, be extended a-s" part of� the ware stores, neighbbrfi6Dd barsI. dc� menL ' -I I I restaurants, coffee shops or drug r 4 Planners and developers said they storc� professional ohfic�s; and,I I studios such cis art, dafice, musi��- 4 had not heard of, the proposalo until a " III I I I I *, ,oII I L. � Vi and photography. Monday. I. ','Similar Iuseg" may, alib:be Bois-De.Arc is : e proposed allowed under the proposal."if it 26A7acre,.19-lot residential develop. lardi ment north of Maple and east of Sang. is determined by the*city p er ; I , .. I III II,o . I. .... e I , , I . I � �Axio that. the use is similar. to 'o'th'e'r' Ptanners ' also 'voted to 'approve , 0 Sunbridge Center. pses ;I.isted. jj;#TII, I I .-I:sSuch f,"sintilarrit .- would - be . . . JIM .41 of y ? 0 band on whether the = 4�meets 1. 4 1- '1" the puk pose" of and f1he goals and pD*li6&i of the 1-4 . ; ,General, Plin,'f, whethdrothe use' . '4 ­Wo_uld ;;adversely ,.7iffect;. theL '11 neighboring .t�reside i 1 . I.�wheffier the "intensity and chairoo, . I I I IP acterisfics" of the use are similar I "I I I uses a to the other Rowed. I-Planners struck from the' s6cti pin I :I J: osal part on that would , I I Af a __ . I I : I require - bui I gs v III .a 'fachieve` iden I 2k ferringfinstead.to a b d- ::11 1 P: ings have ign . I n go . I i I e lar two and m found in the neigh "Ithinkitneeds tobecompati- -10 ble, but I'm not sure it needs to -14 look like a housc,".said commis-I. � 1 . 1 1 1 1 '. , I. JeIr.-V. .4:L Isioner�ICbarles ;Nick .4g I'li , � I --'. & Ojo� � Pe;.II Ch ')Jofi&bri % 4 . I,questioned�wfiethbr.'r I ,1 .1 1 VIIIII III I equuwg ,a*--, 1. .I S­�tol, V I �4 0 id%aket iiibi 'Ek Tom t n 0 e;I, wh P A 4 Il. I. I E S/ Pa il. e