Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-01-11 Minutes14, MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE FAYETTEVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Payetteville"Planninq Commission was held on Monday, January 11, 1993 in .the Boarcik of. Directors Room on the second floor ,of. the, City, Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: MINUTES /Jana Lynn Britton, Tam Suchecki, Chuck';Nickle, J. E. Springbojn, Kenneth Pummill, Joe Tarvin,' Jett Cato, Bob Reynolds, and Jerry Allred " •=Alett Little, Tim Conklin, Don Bunn,. SharonLangley, members of the press and others ' Me. Britton and Mr.sNickle made corrections to 1992 Planning Commission -:meeting.,. The minutes. the minutes"of-the-December,l4,,<. were approved as\corrected:' • PUBLIC BEARING'- REZONING"R93-1tz< RANDALL GARRISON -'N' -OF WEDINGTON DR., W OF RUPPLE RD. The next item on the agenda was a public hearing of Rezoning R93-1" for property located on the north.=side Of Wedington Drive, west of Rupple..Road, eubmitted7by Dennie Smith_on.behalf:of Randall Garrison and represented Dy TrutanYancey. „The.: request is to "rezone 47.86 acres from R-1, Low Density ateeideitial, to R-2, Medium Density,Reeidential. Mr. Conklin explained -the site was -currently uddeveloped',land with'eurrounding uses including -undeveloped: land and a proposed developdiant tc:the south'. He stated the purposeg -,of the: rezoning to allow the .developer '•to cbnabruct duplexes on the property;t He advised approval'of the;;iezonirig'tequest would"[ allow the developer to increase the density from four unite per°acre to 24<units'' per acre. He noted^sadjacent zoning included -R=1, R2 and'A li: how'ever/ the adjoining R-1 'was parte of anothek' rezoning applications also -"requesting R-2 zoning. • - Mr. Conklin stated rezoning the subject property to R-2 would provide a natural extension of the existing R-2 zoning south of - the -site and would also provide the ,t opportunity'o develop more affordable houeing.for.;;the,City: He 'recommended approval of -the request. Mr. Truman Yancey stated they_ concurred,.with city staff .findings -and recommendations ih=the that.the requested:change.Was compatible with the eurrounding5area.; Mr. Tarvin asked if'it-wae:a:condition of approval that duplexes be:constructed on'the property. Mr: Nickle'etated =it=would' be optional. - Mr. Conklin`agreed and stated it was possible to construct single-family, duplex and multi -family homes. He noted:he had been'incorrect in stating.the'develbper planned on conetructling duplexes. He explalnedcthat.was on the':next rezoning to be heard. • Mr. Russell Black, an adjoining property owner, expressed concernthat there -were a number.of duplexes being constructed in -the area. He asked ifcthoee duplexes • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 2 would be in demand 5, 10 or 15 years from now. He stated he would prefer to see single-family dwellings. In response to a question from Mr. Nickle, Mr. Yancey stated the developer anticipated the density to be 16 units per acre with both single-family and duplexes in the area. Me. Britton stated she had been disappointed in the recommendation of staff. She further stated the report looked at surrounding zoning but nothing else. She advised there was one access out of the neighborhood which had already been developed extensively in duplexes. She pointed out that, further back in the neighborhood, the quality of the duplexes went down considerably. She stated the neighborhood was verging on deterioration and she did not feel further density would help that problem. She reminded the Commission that in the last month they had approved a final plate for 4 different developments which produced 152 unite all funneling onto Wedington Drive. She further pointed out the lots could produce almost 400 new occupants and, together with the 47 acres BMP wanted to develop, there would be another 200 families. She stated there would be almost 1,000 new residents. She pointed out that, in some parts of Arkansas, that would be a whole city. She recommended that, instead of providing more housing in that area, they ,needed to look at other services for the residents. Me. Britton further stated she felt the words "affordable housing" had been utilized at the discrimination of the developer; that she was not sure who it was affordable for -- the purchaser or the developer. she expressed her belief that, for any of the subject area to be developed, there needed to be another access onto Rupple Road so all of the traffic would not be funneled onto Wedington. She further stated she could approve R-1.5 if there was another access. Mr. Springborn agreed with Me. Britton. He stated that, rather than concentrating R-2 in a very large area, they should mix the zoning and have R-1, R-1.5, and R-2. He also agreed there should be access to Rupple Road. He, too, stated he could support R-1.5. Ms. Little pointed out the property did not adjoin Rupple Road and would require off-site improvements. She further stated they had not previously required off- site improvements for rezoninge except for major intersections. She advised R- 1.5 would allow 12 families per acre, which was less than the use proposed by the developer. • Mr. Nickle suggested that, if the property were rezoned, the Commission could look. at -some extensions to the east at the time they reviewed the preliminary plat. • MOTION ,.,,•. Mr. Springborn moved to grant the rezoning.for.R-1.5 rather than R-2 with the understanding the developer and staff would undertake'a way'to promote access to Rupple Road. 'The motion died for lack of a second. " MOTION Me. Britton moved to deny the petition and suggested the petitioner come back with a compromise with part R-1.5 andrpart R-1?for the subject area, allowing a transition and buffer area of R-1.5 between.R-2?,and R-1., She stated she believed .the major part of this property should be R1. Mr. Springborn seconded the motion. dC" a re 100 Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 4 Me. Britton noted the subject property, since it was not as large as the previously considered tract, would not have as much as an impact but she did not see any reason to treat it differently. MOTION Me. Britton moved to deny the petition for rezoning. Mr. Springborn seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. CONDITIONAL USE CU93-1: TRIPLEX JERRY & KAREN ALLRED - 125 BOLES The next item was a request for approval of a conditional use to locate a triplex in an R -O, Residential -Office, zone presented by Richard Shewmaker on behalf of Jerry & Karen Allred. Mr. Nickle advised the owner had expressed his desire to withdraw this item. CONDITIONAL USE CU93-2: MOBILE HOME PARK RANDALL BARNBS - OFF CARRIAGE WAY, N OF WEDINGTON DR. The next item was a request for a conditional use for a mobile home park to be located off Carriage Way, north of Wedington Drive, presented by Harry Gray on behalf of Randall Barnes. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential. Mr. Conklin reported the site was currently undeveloped with the surrounding land being vacant to the north, east and west and presently under development to the south (Northwest Acres, Phase III). He advised access to the site was under construction and would be provided from two public streets once the proposed development south of the site was completed. Mr. Conklin explained that, under the zoning code, mobile home parks had to be at least three acres in size. He noted the proposed site did meet the area requirement. He also noted mobile home parks were permitted as a conditional use in R-2 and R-3 zoning districts. He advised that, if the conditional use were approved, the developer would be required to submit an official plat to the City which would be subject to the subdivision regulations and the mobile home park regulations before development could occur. He further noted the plat would also have to be recorded at the County. Mr. Conklin stated zoning to the north and east of the site was R-1 and zoning to the south and west of the site was R-2. He advised the existing land uses included duplex development directly west (Northwest Acres, Phase II), proposed developed to the south (Northwest Acres, Phase III), and vacant land to the north and east of the site. He advised the Planning Commission would have to make the finding that granting the conditional use would not adversely affect the public interest. He expressed his belief that a mobile home park could be compatible within an R-2 or R-3 zoning district. He recommended approval of the conditional use to allow the mobile home park. Ms. Britton asked what rules applied to a mobile home park that did not apply to a subdivision. 3 • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 3 The motion carried 6-3-0 with Commissioners Britton, Springborn, Nickle, Reynolds, Tarvin and Cato voting "yes" and Commissioners Allred, Suchecki, and Pummill voting "no". PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING R93-2 DR. JANES MOORE - N OF WEDINGTON DR., W OF RUPPLE RD. The next item was a public hearing of Rezoning R93-2 for property located on the north side of Wedington Drive, west of Rupple Road, submitted by Dave Jorgensen on behalf of Dr. James Moore. The request is to rezone 10 acres from R-1, Low Density Residential, to R-2, Medium Density Residential. Mr. Conklin explained the site was currently undeveloped land with surrounding uses including undeveloped land and a proposed developed to the south. He advised a preliminary plat for Northwest Acres, Phase IV, had been submitted for the subject tract of land with the applicant proposing to develop 23 lots containing duplexes. Mr. Conklin noted rezoning the subject property to R-2 would provide a natural extension of the R-2 zoning and the existing development of Northwest Acres situated south of the site. He recommended approval of the rezoning request. Mr. Dave Jorgensen stated it was a coincidence that a request for rezoning of the subject property was at the same meeting as the previous rezoning request. He pointed out the property to the south was R-2 with duplexes. He advised the subject property was 10 acres, 330 feet wide east and west by a quarter of a mile north and south. He informed the Commission there was a cul-de-sac on the north end of the subdivision because there was a deep ravine making it unfeasible to extend the roadway any further north. He further advised the subdivision provided streets to the east and west for future access in the event the adjoining property developed. Mr. Jorgensen stated they had requested R-2 zoning because it seemed to be the natural rezoning since the property to the south was R-2. In response to a question from Mr. Nickle, Mr Jorgensen stated the access to the property was Carlsbad Trace. He stated the property did not connect to Rupple. He noted the only access into the area was Wedington Drive. He again pointed out the subdivision would provide access to both the east and west as that property developed. It was noted the preliminary plat referred to by Mr. Jorgensen would be presented at the January 25 Planning Commission meeting. Various members of the audience had questions regarding the rezoning. Ms. Mary Watson, 1302 Carriage Way, stated she was not in favor of the rezoning since it would bring more traffic and more duplexes. She explained their property value was already dropping from the existing duplexes. She advised the Commission they had attempted to sell their house but had no buyers because of the neighboring duplexes. She stated they needed more single family homes. Mr. Mike Pehosh, a resident of the area, stated there were three items on the agenda which were in his neighborhood. He further stated he had not seen any of the plans for this development but was not as concerned about the subject rezoning since it was behind existing duplexes. Mr Loy Luttrell, a resident of the area, stated R-1 would be a good zoning for the area. He stated he had been a resident of the neighborhood for a number of years and wanted to continue being a resident of the area. • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 5 Mr. Conklin explained some of the rules applying to mobile home parks included having recreational areas, tenant storage facilities, and screening. He stated the section regarding screening read as follows: "Whenever the external boundaries of a mobile home park abuts an R or R -O district or city street or highway, there shall be provided in such park along the common boundary line a screening wall meeting the standards of the city zoning code." Ms. Britton asked if that meant a fence or vegetation. Mr. Conklin stated either would meet the requirements. He further stated the rules included adequate water supply, annual permits, and that all trash and garbage must be removed from the premises. He stated the requirements were quite stringent and very detailed. In response to a question from Mr. Nickle, Mr. Conklin explained mobile home parks were not allowed by right in any zoning district. Mr. Nickle asked if, since the rezoning for the adjoining land had been denied, the staff was now recommending against the conditional use. Mr. Conklin stated that was correct. He explained he did not believe a mobile home park would be a compatible use next to an R-1 district. Mr. Harry Gray stated mobile home parks were not an allowable use by right in any zone. He pointed out the density for a mobile home park was far less than the density allowed in an R-2 zone. In response to a question from Mr. Nickle, Mr. Gray stated he did not know how many mobile home units were proposed. He explained the minimum lot with was 60 or 80 feet. Mr. Conklin stated the minimum lot size for a mobile home park was 4,200 square feet or 10 units per acre and R-2 zoning would allow up to 24 duplexes per acre. Mr. Fred Rehad, an area property owner, stated he was in favor of single-family homes or duplexes but not mobile homes. He related his experience in owning property near a mobile home park and stated he had to sell his property due to the nuisance. Mr. Russell Black, Westwood Gardens, stated he owned 5 acres in the immediate vicinity. He advised he did not want to see the area developed into an enclave of low rent housing. He explained he believed the worst thing that could happen to the area would be a mobile home park in regard to crime, trash build up, etc. Mary Watson, 1302 Carriage Way, explained they had been told, when they purchased their property, there would be single-family homes in the neighborhood. She stated that instead they had duplexes, some of which were very shabby. She told of trying to sell their home and being unable to do so because of the duplexes. She stated people living in mobile homes were transient and mobile homes would lower her property values even further. She pointed out there were a number of mobile home parks in the city which needed to be condemned. Mike Pehosh pointed out the largest growth was taking place on the west side of Fayetteville. He advised he did not believe a mobile home park would make a good entryway from the west. He recognized there were mobile home parks that could be nice and look nice, but pointed out it took stringent rules and regulations. He further advised he believed a mobile home park would devalue the adjoining property and it was not the best use of the property. He requested the conditional use be denied. • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 6 Mr. Gray pointed out only two of the people present that were protesting the mobile home park were actual adjoining property owners, that the rest of the people opposing the mobile home park lived in the area. Mr. Conklin stated he had received a call from the property owner at 4621 Wedington Drive expressing concerns regarding the mobile home park. Mr. Millard Goff, a resident of 46th Street, reminded the Commission they had previously expressed concern regarding the traffic on Highway 16. He pointed out this would add to the problem. He advised that some of the houses in the area were on 4 - 5 acre lots and were only 1,000 feet or so from the subject property. He expressed his concern they would be building a alum. Mr. Gary Adams, 760 N. 46th Street, stated he would be starting a new business at the intersection of Rupple and Wedington. He expressed his objection to a mobile home park in the area. He stated he knew the type of people the mobile home parks brought in and they would cause problems for the adjoining residents. He expressed concern regarding the value of their property. Mr. Loy Luttrell stated he had been a resident in the area since 1970 and agreed with other comments made by residents of the area. MOTION Mr. Suchecki stated he had a problem with locating a mobile home park adjacent to a housing area and moved to deny the conditional use. Mr. Cato seconded the motion. Ms. Britton stated mobile homes were affordable housing and that was desired in the community. She advised there did not seem to be adequate control of mobile home parks in Fayetteville. She noted there were two mobile home parks that were neat and she would not mind living in one if she had to but there were several in town that were dumps. She explained that, since they did not have control over the mobile home parks, she did not believe they should take the risk. Mr. Springborn stated there were inconsistences in the definitions relative to trailer parks and mobile home parks and between the ordinance covering those and the remainder of the planning ordinance. He expressed his belief that, before another conditional use for a mobile home park came before them, they should take a hard look at straightening that up. The motion carried unanimously. WAIVER TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS - SPLIT #2 CLAUDE & FRANCES LANGHAM - 2140 N. COLLEGE The next item was a request for a lot split presented by Claude and Frances Langham for property located at 2140 N. College. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial. Mr. Bunn explained this was a request for 2140 N. College. He advised the request tract from the original 0.95 acre tract. split involved a 0.15 acre lot which had a second split of property located at was to further split off a 0.32 acre He reminded the Commission the first been approved in September, 1990. He noted utilities to serve the proposed lot were located on North College. He further advised it was possible that both water and sewer might lie in North College and could be expensive to access. • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 7 Mr. Bunn stated the proposed lot was of sufficient size to meet the zoning requirement of the City. He pointed out that the 0.48 acre tract (Tract 2) created by the split had no direct frontage onto North College and would require an access easement. Mr. Bunn recommended that the split be approved subject to the construction of a sidewalk along North College as required by the Master Sidewalk Plan and the provision of a permanent access easement for Tract 2. In response to a question by Mr. Nickle, Mr. Bunn stated an access easement did not affect any frontage requirement because there was no minimum frontage requirement. He further advised there was a zero side setback in C-2 zoning so the only requirement that would need to be met was the minimum distance between buildings, as defined by the building code. Mr. Claude Langham explained they were requesting the lot split in order to develop the rear portion of the property. He further explained they wanted to have the option to sell the building fronting on College. He pointed out the paved driveway going up the hill. He advised all of the utilities were available to the property. MOTION Mr. Allred moved to grant the lot split subject to staff comments. Ms. Britton seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. ALLEY VACATION V93-1 JULIE KROHN & BRUCE CULLY - NORTH -SOUTH ALLEY 900 BLK E LIGHTON TR. The next item was a request to vacate a north -south alley in the 900 block of Lighton Trail submitted by Julie Krohn and Bruce Cully. Mr. Bunn explained the applicants were requesting the city vacate a 27 -foot alley off of Lighton Trail on Lots 8 and 9, Block 1 of Rogers Place. He recommended approval of the vacation subject to the granting of a 15 -foot easement off the west side of Lot 8 as requested by the utility companies. Mr. Cully explained the existing alley split his property in half. He further noted it had already been vacated in various spots so it was not contiguous. MOTION Mr. Tarvin moved to approve the alley vacation subject to staff comments. Mr. Pummill seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT - SPECIALTY FASTENING SYSTEMS, INC. SPECIALTY FASTENING SYSTEMS, INC. - 1501 ARMSTRONG AVE. The next item was a large scale development for Specialty Fastening Systems, Inca presented by Ken Shireman on behalf of Specialty Fastening Systems, Inc. The property is located at 1501 Armstrong Avenue, is zoned I-2, Heavy Industrial, and contains 4.78 acres. • s Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 8 Mr. Bunn stated there had been no significant comments from any of the utility representatives. He noted the Fire Chief had requested an additional fire hydrant at the entrance on Armstrong and indications had been that the expansion would be sprinkled. He advised the main issue on the subject development appeared to be drainage. He stated there was a drainage problem on the site that had to be taken care of to complete the project. He explained the owner would have to submit a grading plan for the site as well as a drainage plan. He advised Mr. Shireman had indicated he would need the cooperation of the City in order to provide the necessary drainage. Mr. Bunn recommended that the Large Scale Development be approved subject to the plat review and subdivision committee comments; the submittal and approval of a grading plan and drainage plan; and the additional fire hydrant as requested by the fire chief. Ms. Britton stated the Subdivision Committee had discussed the drainage problem. Mr. Shireman stated he was present to answer any of their questions. He advised they had inherited a bad situation regarding the drainage problem. He explained they planned on extending an existing culvert to the southwest past the property line. He further advised the new addition would be raised at least one foot above the existing floor level. MOTION Mr. Suchecki moved to approve the large scale development subject to staff comments. Mr. Pummill seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT - WEST FAYETTEVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST STEVE MILLER - N OF WEDINGTON, E OF 51ST AVE. The next item was a large scale development for West Fayetteville Church of Christ presented by Steve Miller on behalf of the church for property located on the north side of Wedington, east of 51st Avenue. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural. Mr. Bunn explained the large scale development consisted of a church building located on 4.77 acres (Lots 2 and 3 of Pond Addition to the City of Fayetteville). He noted there had been no significant comments from the utility representatives other than some additional easements had been requested and agreed to by the owner. He advised the Fire Chief had recommended the addition of a fire hydrant at the entrance to the development. He noted other staff remarks had included comments on the sanitation pick-up and the location of the water meter. Mr. Bunn recommended that the large scale development be approved subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; the installation of a fire hydrant at the entrance to the development; the construction of a sidewalk on Highway 16 in accordance with the City's Master Sidewalk Plan; and the execution of a 15 -foot public utility easement by separate instrument in accordance with the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Mr. Steve Miller explained they were putting a single, 3,000 square foot building on 4.77 acres 400 feet back from the street. He advised the owner had agreed to all stipulations requested by staff. 3 • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 9 In response to a question from Mr. Nickle, Mr. Miller stated the church was currently meeting at the West Fayetteville Campus of the high school. MOTION Ms. Britton moved to grant the large scale development subject to staff comments. Mr. Reynolds seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES - 1901 COMMERCE DR. The next item was a large scale development presented by Robert Bracy on behalf of Superior Industries for property located at 1901 Commerce Drive. The property contains 35.99 acres and is zoned I-2, Heavy Industrial. Mr. Bunn explained the large scale development provided for the expansion of Superior Industries at their present site (36 acres) in the South Industrial Park. He noted the expansion consisted of an additional 260,000 square feet of manufacturing area. Mr. Bunn stated there had been no significant comments by any of the utility representatives at the plat review meeting. He noted Don Osborn commented on the location of the water meter and on the need for backflow prevention and the Fire Chief had commented on the need for the proper fire connections on the 8 -inch fire line. Mr. Bunn explained the City was involved in the extension of Commerce Drive to the east and also the extension of water and sewer to serve the expansion. He noted a grading permit application had already been submitted and approved by the City. Mr. Bunn recommended the large scale development be approved subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; approval of street, water, sewer, and drainage plans; and construction of sidewalks in accordance with City ordinances. Mr. Bracy appeared before the Commission and advised the facility would be 280,000 square foot manufacturing facility. He also noted this would create approximately 400 new jobs in the area. MOTION Mr. Cato moved to approve the large scale development subject to staff comments. Ms. Britton seconded the motion. The motion carried 8-0-1 with Commissioners Reynolds, Britton, Springborn, Suchecki, Nickle, Pummill, Cato, and Allred voting "yes" and Commissioner Tarvin abstaining. FINAL PLAT - SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE I & PHASE II MARK FOSTER & BUDDY PEOPLES - S OF SKILLERN, E OF CROSSOVER The next item was presentation of a final plat for Savanna Estates, Phase I, presented by Dave Jorgensen on behalf of Mark Foster and Buddy Peoples. The property is located south of Skillern, east of Crossover Road and is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential. Phase I contains 13.35 acres with 20 proposed lots and Phase II contains 27.48 acres with 21 proposed lots. 9 • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 10 Mr. Bunn noted there had been no significant comments from any of the utility company representatives other than some additional easements requested and agreed to by the owner. He advised there had been comment that, if the easement along the west side of the development was a SWEPCO easement, it needed to be clearly noted on the plat. He advised staff had no comments on the plats except that subdivision covenants would be required to provide for maintenance of the common areas and that a contract for the unfinished public improvements be required. He further noted the Subdivision Committee remarks had included comments on the improvement of Skillern Road, the construction of the sidewalk along Skillern Road, and the lack of immediate cable service. Mr. Bunn recommended approval of the final plats for Savanna Estates, Phase I and Phase II, be approved subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; construction of sidewalks along Skillern Road; a notation on the plat regarding the lack of immediate cable service for the subdivision; resolution of the street names; and submittal of the subdivision covenants prior to the filing of the final plat. Mr. Jorgensen advised one of the recommendations was that sidewalks be installed throughout the subdivision including along Skillern Road. He advised they were constructing sidewalks on both sides of the street except along Skillern. He pointed out it might not be practicable to install sidewalks along Skillern Road. He requested the possibility of a Bill of Assurance. Mr. Yancey presented photographs of the south side of Skillern Road. He pointed out the housing in this development would not open onto Skillern Road and would be fenced off from Skillern Road. He advised the sidewalk would have to go at the top of a bank and, at some future date, the road would be widened, curbed and guttered. He stated it would then be reasonable to install the sidewalks. He further stated sidewalks along Skillern would serve no one at this time. Mr. Nickle reminded the Commission there had been a similar situation on Township Road. He asked how the city had handled that matter. Mr. Bunn stated he believed the city had approved a Bill of Assurance. Mr. Nickle asked if the staff would recommend a Bill of Assurance in this matter. Both Ms. Little and Mr. Bunn stated they would be agreeable with accepting a Bill of Assurance. MOTION Mr. Springborn moved to approve the final plats for Savanna Estates, Phases I and II, subject to staff comments and the acceptance of a Bill of Assurance regarding sidewalk. Mr. Suchecki seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. FINAL PLAT - CROSSOVER HEIGHTS, PHASE III BEATING ENTERPRISES - S OF MISSION, E OF CROSSOVER The next item was a final plat for Crossover Heights, Phase III, submitted by Dave Jorgensen on behalf of Keating Enterprises, for property located south of /0 • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 13 Dr. Joan Conners, 885 Fritz, agreed with Mr. Cochran. She advised they had been told a year ago there would only be three houses located on the acreage which would preserve the natural quality of the area and allow children to play. She stated nine lots was far too many and the traffic would increase significantly. Mr. Nickle asked how many lots had been approved through the lot splits approved previously. Mr. Bunn stated the lot splits allowed 7 lots. He advised approval of the subdivision would create 13 lots, making 6 additional lots. Mr. Allred asked if the drainage problem would be addressed if the subdivision was approved. Mr. Bunn explained the engineer had indicated all of the drainage from the area would be taken to an existing storm drain. He advised he had not reviewed the drainage plan but did feel it could be handled and would be improved. Ms. Britton stated the property owners at Fritz and Prospect had to construct a moat all around the house due to the run-off. Grey House, one of the developers of the property, stated the development would put all of the drainage underground. He further stated the drainage for the entire area would be improved. In response to a question from Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Gray stated all adjoining property owners had been sent a certified letter advising them of the meeting. Mr. House advised he had personally contacted many of neighborhood residents and none of them had voiced any objections. He explained they had constructed many homes in the area already and the neighbors were happy with the homes. Mr. Bunn advised he had received 11 green cards back from the certified mail out of 14 mailed so notifications had been made around the first of the year. One of the residents of the area advised they had not had the water problem they now have until the developers started cutting down the trees in the area. MOTION Mr. Allred moved to approve the preliminary plat subject to staff comments. Mr. Pummill seconded the motion. Mr. Bunn advised there was a water line running north and south across the subject property. He stated they would like to make the approval subject to the granting of an easement along the water line. He noted they would require a 15 foot easement. Mr. Allred amended his motion to include the easement. The motion carried unanimously. PRELIMINARY PLAT - KAITLYNN MEADOWS BOB & DONNA TREAT - E OF DOUBLE SPRINGS RD., S OF DOT TIPTON RD. The next item was a request for approval of a preliminary plat for Kaitlynn Meadows presented by Mel Milholland on behalf of Bob and Donna Treat, for property located east of Double Springs Road, south of Dot Tipton Road. The // Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 12 Mr. Bunn stated there had been a total of 5 lot splits (approved in early 1992) on two different properties on this site creating a total of 7 lots. He explained that four of the lots created by those splits were excepted from the subject subdivision with the remaining three lots being subdivided and constituting Rosewood Heights. He noted there had been no significant comments by any of the utility company representatives other than some additional easements requested and agreed to by the owner. He advised staff remarks included comments on the location of the fire hydrant and the planned location of water meters. He noted it had also been pointed out that a grading and drainage plan would be required for the subdivision, and that each lot in the subdivision where the grade exceeded 20 percent would require an individual grading permit prior to any dirt moving operations. Mr. Bunn stated there had been comments on the driveway going back to the two tandem lots. He advised staff had recommended the driveway be paved and the engineer had indicated that it would probably be gravel as allowed by the ordinances governing tandem lots. He stated discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included drainage concerns, stability of the soils, and sidewalk location. Mr. Bunn recommended that the preliminary plat be approved subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; approval of drainage, streets, water, and sewer plans; submission and approval of a grading plan; construction of sidewalks and payment of parks fees in accordance with City ordinances; and paving of the entire length of driveway to the tandem lots. Ms. Britton recommended a notation on the plat that there was a common drive for the two tandem lots. She also recommended leaving the developer the option of placement of the driveway rather than going up the center, considering the terrain. Mr. Harry Gray stated he concurred with staff comments. He further stated he was not sure they would want a notation on the plat regarding the common drive because there was always the possibility the owners of the two tandem lots would not want to share a common drive. Ms. Britton stated if there were two separate drives, the run-off would be changed and the drainage might not be adequate to handle two drives. In response to a question from Mr. Tarvin regarding ownership of the driveway, Mr. Bunn stated it appeared the owners of lots 2 and 5 would own the property and the owners of lots 3 and 4 would be given a permanent access easement. He further noted the owners of lots 3 and 4 would be responsible for the maintenance of the driveway. Mr. Russell Cochran, a resident of Fritz Street, stated he was representing some of the neighborhood. He advised they had been told there would be 6 more homes constructed in the subdivision. He pointed out there was quite a bit of run-off because the soil was composed of slate and clay. He stated the run-off had increased due to construction and the property at the corner of Fritz and Prospect was receiving a great deal of water. He further stated the water ran down city streets, causing damage to the streets. He noted the establishment of a subdivision at this location would block immediate access to the park for the neighborhood children. Mr. Cochran advised the neighborhood had been quiet but, streets were being torn up, they were having drainage heavy traffic. due to construction, the problems, and there was • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 11 Mission, east of Crossover. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential, and contains 8.13 acres with 23 proposed lots. Mr. Bunn noted there had been no significant comments by either the utility company representatives or the staff. He stated there had been some changes in the fire hydrant location and an extension of a 6 -inch water line in response to staff comments. He advised there was also an off-site easement requested by Southwestern Bell Telephone. Mr. Bunn recommended approval of the final plat subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; payment of parks fees and construction of sidewalks in accordance with city ordinances; the execution of a contract with the City for any unfinished improvements; and the granting of the off-site easement as requested. He noted the easement was to be granted by separate instrument and would be a general utility easement. MOTION Mr. Cato moved to approve the final plat subject to staff comments. Mr. Pummill seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. FINAL PLAT - HAMMOND PLAZA RUTH HAMMOND TRUST - S OF APPLEBY, W OF N. COLLEGE The next item was presentation of the final plat of Hammond Plaza presented by Mel Milholland on behalf of the Ruth Hammond Trust, for property located south of Appleby, west of North College. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial, and contains 5.14 acres with 8 proposed lots. Mr. Bunn stated there had been no significant comments either by the staff or the utility company representatives. He advised that all public improvements, except the street, had been completed. Mr. Bunn recommended approval of the final plat subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; construction of sidewalks in accordance with the City's Master Sidewalk Plan; and the execution of a contract with the City for the unfinished improvements. Mr. Milholland stated he concurred with staff's recommendation. MOTION Ms. Britton moved to approve the final plat subject to staff comments. Mr. Springborn seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. PRELIMINARY PLAT - ROSEWOOD HEIGHTS ALEXANDER -HOUSE REALTY VENTURES - OFF FRITZ DRIVE, N OF PROSPECT The next item was a preliminary plat for Rosewood Heights presented by Harry Gray on behalf of Alexander -House Realty Ventures, Inc. for property located off Fritz Drive, north of Prospect. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, and contains 2.50 acres with 9 proposed lots. Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 14 property contains 8.25 acres with 4 proposed lots and is located outside the City Limits. Mr. Bunn stated there had been no significant comments by any of the utility company representatives other than some easements being requested and agreed to by the owners. He advised water was already existing on Double Springs Road nd individual septic tanks would be utilized for sewage disposal. Mr. Bunn recommended the preliminary plat be approved subject to plat review comments and subject to whatever requirements the County might impose on the development. Me. Britton asked if the County had made any comments on the plat. Mr. Milholland stated they had addressed the street improvements and drainage. MOTION Mr. Springborn moved to approve the preliminary plat subject staff comments. Me. Britton seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. INFORMAL PLAT - CMN PROPERTIES NANCHAR, INC. - N OF HIGHWAY 71 BYPASS, W OF N COLLEGE The next item was an informal plat for CMN Properties presented by Mel Milholland on behalf of Nanchar, Inc. for property located north of Highway 71 Bypass, west of North College. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural, and R-1, Low Density Residential, and contains approximately 300 acres. Mr. Bunn explained the purpose of the submittal of the informal plat at this time was to let both the City and the utility companies be aware of the general plans for the area. He advised that, among the issues discussed, were wetlands, drainage, the location of the planned 36 -inch water line in the area, the extension of Joyce Street and Shiloh Drive, and general development issues. He noted no action was being requested on this plat at this time. Mr. Milholland explained the developers did not intend to develop the entire tract immediately but did intend to do some improvements, including the extension of Joyce Street over to Johnson Road. He advised they had numerous meetings with City staff regarding this matter and had worked closely with the developer of the Duane Nelson property for the alignment of Joyce Street. There was discussion regarding the proposed zoning for the area. Mr. Nickle pointed out it appeared there was a lot of proposed C-2 zoning. Mr. Bunn advised there was a request to the Corps of Engineers to make a wetlands determination on the subject property. He also noted Mr. Milholland had proposed some extensive drainage improvements along Mud Creek. He stated the City was committed to the extension of Joyce Street and would be participating in that extension. He noted Joyce would have to curve to the south since there was a subdivision in Johnson which would keep the street from going straight across. Mr. Springborn asked how the City of Fayetteville worked with an adjoining city in a matter such as street extension. Mr. Bunn stated they had not had any communication with the City of Johnson on this particular issue. He advised the road could go through a portion of Johnson • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 15 and there would need to be some relocation of Johnson Road in order to accommodate the route they had in mind. He stated they would have to meet with the City of Johnson to discuss the issue. He further advised one city did have the right of eminent domain over the property within another city. He stated they expected to deal with individual property owners within Johnson but they certainly would contact the City of Johnson and do everything they could to work with them. PRELIMINARY PLAT - CNN PROPERTIES NANCHAR, INC. - N & S OF MILLSAP,R W OF N. COLLEGE The next item was a request for approval of a preliminary plat for CMN Properties submitted by Mel Milholland on behalf of Nanchar, Inc. for property located on the north and south sides of Millsap, west of North College. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial, and contains 32.7 acres with 19 proposed lots. Mr. Bunn stated there had been no significant issues raised by the utility company representatives other than several requests for easements which were agreed to by the owner. He noted staff comments had included questions on fire hydrant locations, street names, drainage, and flood plain location. He stated the developer had been advised that they might need a Corps of Engineers determination on wetlands because of the pond located on the property. Mr. Bunn advised discussion at the subdivision committee centered mainly around the question of the street name. He stated it had been indicted that the name of the street connecting Futrall and Millsap should be named Futrall and furthermore, the existing Millsap portion should be changed to Futrall. He further stated the Planning Management Director had requested that buildings constructed on Lots 1 through 9 have two "fronts" since they will be facing both Futrall and the Bypass. Mr. Bunn recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; fire hydrant locations as required by the Fire Chief; the construction of sidewalks in accordance with City ordinances; approval of a grading plan for the site; and approval of final plans for water, sewer, streets, and drainage. He noted the street name issue would be resolved by the City Council. Mr. Nickle asked if this project would tie onto the 12 -inch water line and bring it across. Mr. Bunn stated he believed there was an 8 -inch at that point and it would tie over to an existing 8 -inch on Millsap. Mr. Nickle asked if they had thought about up-sizing that line. He suggested looking into it. Mr. Milholland stated they concurred with staff comments. He noted they still needed a street name for the street to the south. Mr. Tom Lewis of Lewis Brothers Leasing Company, an adjoining property owner, stated he wanted to voice their approval of the proposed plat. MOTION Mr. Suchecki moved to approve the preliminary plat subject to staff comments. Mr. Cato seconded the motion. /5 • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 16 The motion carried unanimously. PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPRING PARR, PHASE II DUANE NELSON - W OF SHILOH, N OF HIGHWAY 71 BYPASS The next item was a request for approval of a preliminary plat for Spring Park, Phase II, submitted by Robert Brown on behalf of Duane Nelson for property located west of Shiloh, north of Highway 71 Bypass. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial, and contains 67.35 acres with 11 proposed lots. Mr. Bunn reported the utility company representatives had requested changes in some of the easements and some additional easements which were agreed to by the developer. He explained that all of the lots within the subdivision would have to go through the large scale development process and additional easements would probably be requested at that time. He further noted the Fire Chief made some general comments on the fire code requirements regarding fire hydrant spacing. He advised there had also been some comments on the need to provide an easement for the 36 -inch transmission line planned to go on the south boundary of the subdivision, the question of drainage through the site, the improvement of Shiloh Drive, and a question concerning a wetlands determination from the Corps of Engineers. Mr. Bunn noted a major issue had been raised at the Plat Review meeting regarding whether or not the streets within the subdivision should be publicly owned and maintained or privately owned and maintained. He advised staff indicated they felt the streets should be public while the developer felt otherwise. He stated Subdivision discussion centered on traffic concerns within the subdivision and in the general vicinity of the subdivision. He noted specific items included improvements to Shiloh Drive, a turn lane at Shiloh and College, and possible improvements to the intersection of Joyce and Highway 71B. He advised the Subdivision Committee voted to forward the plat to the full Planning Commission without any specific conditions or recommendations. Mr. Bunn recommended that the preliminary plat be approved subject to plat review and subdivision committee comments; submission and approval of a grading plan and a drainage plan; approval of the detailed plane for streets, drainage, water, and sewer plans; improvements to Shiloh Drive on the east side of the development; a wetlands determination by the Corps of Engineers; participation in the improvements at Joyce and Highway 71B; and granting of a 50 -foot utility easement across the entire south side of the property for the planned 36 -inch waterline and other utilities. Mr. Bunn advised the Commission the City was no longer requiring that streets within the subdivision be public; however, the City was concerned about streets within the subdivision as they related to emergency vehicles and general traffic circulation. He stated each of the large scale developments would be reviewed with traffic flow in mind. Mr. Robert Brown, Development Consultants, stated he was in agreement with the comments given by Mr. Bunn. He advised he had requested a determination from the Corps regarding a wetlands determination and had contacted the State Highway Department regarding improvements to Joyce Street. He further advised they would be providing detailed plans with the large scale developments they would be filing later in the week for the first three lots. He suggested they would be willing to participate in the improvement of the intersection of Joyce and North College at a prorated factor. Mr. Nickle asked what the benefit would be to the property owner to retain ownership of the streets. th • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 17 Mr. Brown explained they did not want through street construction on the subject property other than the extension of Joyce Street. He pointed out the streets on the property were primarily drives within a large shopping center concept. He explained the intent was to have separate ownerships within the tract but it would be one large shopping center development. He noted they would see more details on the ingress and egress with the filing of the large scale developments. Mr. Ed Valars, Vice President and General Manager of Northwest Arkansas Mall, spoke in support of the proposal. He did, however, express concern regarding the intersection of Joyce and North College and noted they would be improving the intersection at Zion Road and North College. MOTION Mr. Cato moved to approved the preliminary plat subject to staff comments. Mr. Pummill seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. REVISIONS TO SECTION 98 OF FAYETTEVILLE CODE - CLOSORE OF STREETS, ALLEYS & EASEMENTS Ms. Little stated the proposed draft of the ordinance was different than the one presented to the Commission earlier. She pointed out the current draft did not include easements. She explained she had visited with the City Attorney and was hoping easement vacations could be approved administratively since it did not involve ownership of land. She advised that, should the City Attorney determine easement vacations needed to be reviewed by the City Council, the ordinance would be redrafted. Ms. Little also pointed out the latest draft included a hearing for alley and street closures at the Planning Commission level. Mr. Allred stated it seemed to him they were having double hearings and, if that was the case, he would prefer the City Council hear the requests. Ms. Little pointed out they had been handling street and alley vacations in that manner and had been directed by the previous Board of Directors to change the procedure and bring the requests to the Planning Commission. Mr. Allred stated they would be requiring the petitioner to present and defend himself at two public hearings. He stated he believed this would be adding another layer of bureaucracy. Mr. Reynolds pointed out the Board had wanted to put the responsibility on the Planning Commission. Mr. Springborn noted the Planning Commission dealt with the Master Plan for streets on a regular basis and it would be appropriate for the Commission to hear the requests. Mr. Allred stated they could hear it and then have their decision appealable to the City Council. Ms. Little stated that, by law, it took action by the City Council. Ms. Britton reminded the Commission of an earlier street vacation where the petitioner owned property on both sides of the street. She pointed out he had /7 • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 18 received property approximately the size of a city lot. She asked if there should not be some type of compensation to the City. Ms. Little explained the City would not have given up the right-of-way if it had a use for the right-of-way. Mr. Tarvin pointed out that, when a lot was purchased, the purchaser was paying for the right-of-way also. Mr. Nickle pointed out the petitioner also had to pay property taxes when the property went into the petitioner's name. He reminded the Commission that, at the time of the vacation of Vandevender Street, residents had complained that it had not come before the Planning Commission for a public hearing. Ms. Little explained the reason it had not come before the Planning Commission was that, for the last 9 years, the City had followed a state statute that said it could go directly to the City Council. NOTION Mr. Cato moved to pass the proposed ordinance. Mr. Springborn seconded the motion. The motion carried 8-1-0 with Commissioners Allred, Britton, Suchecki, Springborn, Nickle, Reynolds, Tarvin and Cato voting "yes" and Commissioner Pummill voting "no". DISCUSSION OF SIDEWALKS Me. Little stated they required the developer to show the sidewalk on the plat according to the Master Sidewalk Plan. She advised they had begun requiring the sidewalks be placed four feet in from the curb. She explained this was in response to a number of concerns, including safety of the pedestrian. She advised the other reason for this change was often the post office required the property owner to place the mail box on the side most convenient for the carrier. She pointed out sometimes the mail box was on the same side of the street as the sidewalk which made the sidewalk impassible. She advised a four foot median would give adequate room for the mail box and provide the homeowner an area for landscaping. She further explained if the terrain was unsuitable to have the sidewalk set back, the property owner could request a waiver. Ms. Little explained the developer did not install the sidewalk because it would have to be cut for the driveway. She advised that, in the future, she would bring before the Commission a requirement that the developer must install the sidewalk as part of the improvements. In response to a question from Ms. Britton, Mr. Bunn explained it was possible the sidewalk would not have to be disturbed upon installation of the driveway. Ms. Britton pointed out that, if they required the sidewalk be built at the same standard as the driveway, it would not have to be removed. Mr. Nickle explained it was a matter of the grade for the driveway. Ms. Little also noted Mr. Ken Shireman was present and had written her a letter regarding setting the sidewalks back four feet from the curb. Mr. Shireman informed the Commission he felt very strongly about setting the sidewalks back four feet. He explained he believed it was long overdue for the • • • Planning Commission January 11, 1993 Page 19 City. He stated he believed it was a matter of safety for pedestrians and further believed the sidewalk should be set back further than four feet. He further stated he would like to see the sidewalks on major arterials set back 12 to 20 feet from the curb. He also agreed with Ms. Britton there should be sidewalk standards. He explained he believed this should be in the form of an ordinance. DISCUSSION OF PARRS FEES • Ms. Little stated she had received a question from a Planning Commissioner regarding parks fees. She explained parks fees were an impact fee and collected for each residential lot. She noted the developer of apartment complexes paid the fee at one time. She further explained the Parks Board made the determination as to whether they wanted to collect parks fees or took land, in lieu of parks fees. She advised the parks fee was paid by the person developing the lot which resulted in no parks fees being collected on lots that were not developed. She explained impact fees had to serve those residents that paid them. Ms. Little explained the question had come up as to whether the developer should be paying the parks fees upon approval of the final plat. She advised the Planning Department collected those fees, at the present time, at the time the building permit was issued. Mr. Nickle stated he had been under the impression that the developer paid the green space fees and had been corrected by two individuals that had just purchased lots. He recommended a notation be made on the plat that green space fees would have to be paid at the time the building permit was issued. Mr. Bunn pointed out that often someone purchasing a lot never saw the plat. Mr. Nickle stated at least it would be noted. OTHER BUSINESS: Welcoming of New Planning Commissioner Mr. Nickle stated he wanted to welcome and introduce the new Planning Commissioner, Bob Reynolds. He stated Mr. Reynolds had asked if the Commission had a tour to go review the items coming before them. Mr. Nickle stated he agreed with Mr. Reynolds that one was needed. He requested the Planning Commissioners contact Ms. Little if there was any interest in setting up a tour. Mr. Springborn also welcomed Ms. Britton and Mr. Nickle as being reappointed to the Commission. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. 9 /7 K) ACCESS MANAGEMENT 451 ADKINS, TILLMAN & BETTY (R93-38) 315 ALBRIGHT, SPENCER ET AL (R93-23) 179 ALBRIGHT, SPENSER ET AL (R93-24) 179 ALBRIGHT, SPENSER ET AL (R93-25) 179 ALEXANDER -HOUSE REALTY VENTURES - ROSEWOOD HEIGHTS (PP) 13 ALLRED, JERRY & KAREN (CU95-1) 3 ALL RENTS - ROB WOOD (LSD) 214 APPEALS TO CITY COUNCIL 348 APPOINTMENT OF NOMINATING COMMITTEE 29 ARKANSAS REGION ATHLETIC CLUB - DAN HART (LSD) 452 ASSOCIATION OF BAPTIST STUDENTS (CU93-34) 452 ATLAS CONSTRUCTION (R93-43) 378 0-_ ATLAS 'CONSTRUCTION - BOXWOOD ADDITION (PP) 439 BABCOCK, ROBERT & SERENA (LS#1) "` 160 BABCOCK, ROBERT & SERENA (CU93-16) 160 BAILEY, SCOTT & SHIPLEY (LS#1) 2L BAILEY, THOMAS (PARKING WAIVER) BAILEY, THOMAS - GEORGIAN PLACE (PP) 8 BAILEY, THOMAS & PEARSON. - GEORGIAN PLACE (FP) 252 BAKER, HARRY (R93-47) 406 BAKER, BARRY - WOODLAWN ADDITION (PP) 470 .BARNES, RANDALL (CU93-2) 3 BENEVOLENT BUILDING CORP PRIVATE LODGE (CU93-3) 21 BENEVOLENT BUILDING CORP - ELKS ADDITION (CCP) 386 BLACK, CECIL & SULLAVAN (V93-6) 196 BMP DEVELOPMENT- PINECREST (PP) 47 BOARDWALK SUBDIVISION, PHASE IV - JIM LINDSEY (PP) 192 BOARDWALK SUBDIVISION, PHASE IV - JIM LINDSEY (FP) 260 BRACY, ROBERT - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES (LSD) 475 BROOKS, W.J. (LS#1) 28 BROOKS, W.J. (CU93-17) 146 BROOKS, W:J. (LS#1) 146 BROPHY ADDITION, PHASE I - RALPH BROPHY (PP) 336 BROPHY ADDITION, PHASE I - RALPH PROPHY (FP) 397 BROPHY, RALPH; .BROPHY ADDITION, PHASE I (PP) 336 BOXWOOD ADDITION - ATLAS CONSTRUCTION (PP) 439 BUNDRICK, RICHARD.& JENNIFER (R93-9) 56 BUNDRICK,'RICHARD & JENNIFER - HORSEHOE ADDITION (PP) 134 CAIN,,HOWARD & DIXIE & SMITH (R93-28) 198 CAIN, HOWARD'& DIXIE & SMITH (R93-29) 198 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE & SMITH (R93-30) 198 CAIN, HOWARD &DIXIE & SMITH (R93-31) 198 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE & SMITH (R93-28) 206 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE & SMITH (R93-29) 206 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE & SMITH (R93-30) 206 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE & SMITH (R93-31) 206 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE (R93-39) 372 CAIN, HOWARD & DIXIE (R93-40) 372 CALDWELL, JANICE & LLOYD & NEWHART (LS#1) 452 CALDWELL, JANICE & LLOYD & NEWHART (LS#1) 453 CANFIELD, CAL (PARKING WAIVER) 90 CANFIELD, CAL (PARKING WAIVER) 148 CASTLE DEVELOPMENT - WALNUT VIEW ESTATES, PHASE I (FP) 201 CASTLE DEVELOPMENT - WALNUT VIEW ESTATES, PHASE II (FP) 304 CEDARPOINT SUBDIVISION - DOY GILLIHAN (PP) 158 CEI ENGINEERING - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT (LSD) 84 CEI ENGINNERING - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT (LSD) 354 CEI ENGINEERING - (R93-19) 155 CHANCE, DAVID & PATRICIA (R93-17) 138 CHURCH OF CHRIST AKA WEST FAYETTEVILLE/STEVE MILLER (LSD) 8 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE SHOP - BILL OESTREICH (LSD) 359 CLARK, L. GLENN & WINIFRED - MISSION HILLS (FP) 352 CLARY DEVELOPMENT & DUANE NELSON (CU93-8) 58 CLARY DEVELOPMENT - SPRING PARK PHASE II (LOTS 4,6,8&11) (FP) 225 CLARY DEVELOPMENT (V93-8) 226 CLEVENGER, CLIFFORD (R93-42) 377 CLIFFS, THE & UNDERWOOD & LINDSEY (CP) 216 CLOSURE OF STREETS, ALLEYS & EASEMENTS - SECTION 98 (REVISIONS) 17 CMN PROPERTIES - NANCHAR, INC. (CP) 14 CMN PROPERTIES - NANCHAR, INC. (PP) 15 CMN PROPERTIES - NANCHAR, INC. (FP) 371 COILLIER, PIERCE (V93-2) 42 COLLEGE STREET STORAGE - KEATING ENTERPRISES (LSD) 69 COMMERCE DRIVE - REQUEST FOR STREET NAME CHANGE 447 COMPLAINTS 29 CONDUCT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS 350 CORNISH, H.L. - HILLSIDE TERRACE (PP) 334 CORNISH, H.L. - STERLING ESTATES AKA HILLSIDE TERRACE (PP) 412 CROSSOVER HEIGHTS, PHASE II - KEATING ENTERPRISES (FP) 51 CROSSOVER HEIGHTS, PHASE III - KEATING ENTERPRISES (FP) 10 CROSSOVER STORAGE - GORDON WILKINS & DANNY VILLINES (LSD) 259 CROSSOVER PLAZA - VILLINES & WILKINS 450 CROSSOVER PLAZA - VILLINES & WILKINS 475 CRYSTAL SPRINGS, PHASE I - JED DEVELOPMENT (PP) 264 CRYSTAL SPRINGS - JED DEVELOPMENT (PP) 324 CULLY, BROWN AKA KROEHN, JULIE (V93-1) 7 CUMMINGS, STEVE (LSD) 319 • DANDY, GARY - SPOT NOT CAR WASH (LSD) 321 DAWN ACRES - SAM MATHIAS (PP) 49 DAWN ACRES - SAM MATHIAS (FP) 304 DELP, MELISSA (LS#1) 388 DUELL, CHARLES & DIANA (V93-10) 449 DOZIER, DORIS (CU93-24) 230 DRAINAGE ORDINANCE 162 DRAINAGE ORDINANCE 197 DRANE, ELZA & BETTY (LS#1) 257 DUNAWAY, DUB (R93-36) 310 DUNAWAY, DUB - JUSTIN ADDITION (PP) 416 DUNAWAY, DUB - JUSTIN ADDITION (FP) 449 ELKS ADDITION - BENEVOLENT BUILDING CORP (CCP) 386 ELSASS, KIRK (LS#3) 258 ELECTION OF OFFICERS 53 EDWARDS REVOCABLE TRUST (R93-18) 140 EPPERLY, DANIEL AND REBA (R93-44) 435 EPPERLY, DANIEL AND REBA (R93-45) 435 EVANS, MARSHALL DALE (R93-6) 34 FAUBUS, DOYLE (CU93-18) 211 • FEE IMPACT REPORT REQUEST 258 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (LSD) 68 FOSTER, MARK & PEOPLES - SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE III (PP) 190 FOSTER, MARK & PEOPLES - SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE IV (PP) 190 FUGIT, BILL (CU93-11) 86 FUGIT, BILL (CU93-11) 136 FUTURE PLANS 29 • GARRISON, RANDALL (R93-1) 1 GARRISON, RANDALL (R93-13) 104 GARRISON, RANDALL (R93-14) 104 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 137 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 297 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 351 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 389 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 420 GENERAL LAND USE PLAN 448 GEORGIAN PLACE - TOM BAILEY (PP) 84 GEORGIAN PLACE - TOM BAILEY & TOM PEARSON (FP) 252 GILLIHAN, DOY - CEDARPOINT SUBDIVISION (PP) 158 GIS INFORMATIONAL MEETING 53 GLENNBROOK ADDITION, PHASE II - GORDON WILKINS (PP) 261 GLENN, TOMMY & LETHA (CU93-15) 159 • GRAY, HARRY (CU93-21) 227 GRAY, HARRY (CU93-22) 227 GRAY, HARRY (LS#1) 227 GREENE-ANDERSON ENTERPRISES (LS#1) 161 GREGG PLAZA (LSD) 371 GROFF, MARTIN & BEATRICE (R93-52) 459 HAMM, DOYNE & GELENE - HAMM ESTATES (PP) 384 HAMM ESTATES - DOYNE & GELENE HAMM (PP) 384 HAMMOND PLAZA - RUTH HAMMOND TRUST (FP) 13 HANCOCK, CATHY (CU93-6) 41 HANNA WAREHOUSES, PHASE II (LSD) 397 HART, DAN - ARKANSAS REGIONAL ATHLETIC CLUB (LSD) 452 HECKATHORN PROPERTIES - SANG AVENUE APARTMENTS (LSD) 168 HEGER, GREG - WILD HAWG GRILL (LSD) 242 HEINZELMANN, PETER (LS#1) 204 HEINZELMANN, PETER (LS#1) 204 HILLSIDE TERRACE - H.L. CORNISH (PP) 334 HILLSIDE TERRACE AKA STERLING ESTATE - H.L. CORNISH (PP) 412 HINKLE, WAYNE (LS#1) 490 HOLIMAN, RANDY & GRETCHEN (CU93-35) 475 HOLIMAN, RANDY & GRETCHEN (LS#1) 475 • HOLLAN, DAVID LYLE (LS#1) 417 HOLLMAN, DAVID LYLE (LS#1) 195 HOLLMAN, DAVID LYLE (LS#1) 430 HOLLMAN LOT SPLIT SETTLEMENT OFFER 370 HORSESHOE ADDITION - RICHARD & JENNIFER BUNDRICK (PP) 134 HORSESHOE ADDITION - C&B LAND & DEVELOPMENT CO. (FP) 363 HOYET GREENWOOD ESTATE (LS#2) 203 JED DEVELOPMENT (ANNEXATION) 183 JED DEVELOPMENT (R93-22) 183 JED DEVELOPMENT - CRYSTAL SPRINGS, PHASE I (PP) 264 JED DEVELOPMENT - CRYSTAL SPRINGS (PP) 324 JED DEVELOPMENT (ANNEXATION & R93-22) 454 JOHNSON, DARAN (R93-20) 164 JOHNSON, HAROLD (R93-54) 479 JOHNSON, HAROLD (R93-55) 479 JONES, HAROLD - WOODSIDE ADDITION (PP) 482 JUSTIN ADDITION - DUB DUNAWAY (PP) 416 JUSTIN ADDITION - DUB DUNAWAY (RP) 449 KAITLYNN MEADOWS - BOB & DONNA TREAT (PP) 11 KAITLYNN MEADOWS - BOB & DONNA TREAT (FP) 52 KEATING ENTERPRISES - CROSSOVER HEIGHTS, PHASE II (FP) 51 KEATING ENTERPRISES - CROSSOVER HEIGHTS, PHASE III (PP) 10 KEATING ENTERPRISES - COLLEGE STREET STORAGE 69 KING, CHRIS (R93-8) 54 KIRBY, HELEN R. (ANNEXATION) 113 KIRBY, HELEN R. (R93-11) 113 KIRBY, HELEN R. - KIRBY'S MILL SUBDIVISION (PP) 114 KIRBY'S MILL SUBDIVISION, HELEN R. KIRBY (PP) 114 KLINGER, TIM (PARKING WAIVER) 255 KLINGER, TIM (LS#1) 256 KLINGER, TIM (PARKING WAIVER) 317 KLINGER, TIM (LS#1) 318 KROEHN, JULIE AKA BROWN CULLY (V93-1) 7 KWIK INDUSTRIES, INC - KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE (LSD) 397 KWIK KAR LUBE & TUNE - KWIK INDUSTRIES, INC (LSD) 397 LAKESIDE VILLAGE APARTMENTS - JIM LINDSEY (LSD) 432 LANDERS, PAMELA (CU93-14) 145 LANGHAM, CLAUDE & FRANCES (LS#2) 6 LAWRENCE, BOB (LS#3) 446 LAZENBY, BILL (R93-26) 181 LAZENBY, BILL (R93-27) 181 LAZENBY, BILL (LS#1) 182 • LINDSEY FAMILY TRUST (V93-5) 147 LINDSEY, JIM - BOARDWALK SUBDIVISION, PHASE IV (PP) 192 LINDSEY, JIM - BOARDWALK SUBDIVISION, PHASE IV (FP) 260 LINDSEY, JIM & UNDERWOOD - THE CLIFFS (A PUB) 216 LINDSEY, JIM - LAKESIDE VILLAGE APARTMENTS (LSD) 433 LLOYD, LYNN - V93-9 449 LYNN -LEIGH HILL ADDITION - JIM WHEELER (PP) 463 MASTERS, THE - WRIGHT & PENCE (PP) 274 MASTERS, THE - WRIGHT & PENCE (PP) 488 MATHIAS, SAM - DAWN ACRES (PP) 49 MATHIAS, SAM - DAWN ACRES (FP) 304 MCBRIDE DISTRIBUTING - BOB MCBRIDE (LSD) 215 MCCHRISTIAN, GLENN (LS#2) 287 MCFARLAND, GENEVA & MILLER (R93-35) 239 MCFARLAND, GENEVA & MILLER (R93-35) 477 MCFARLAND, GENEVA & MILLER (R93-35) 491 MCILROY, HAYDEN (CU93-28) 367 MERRY -SHIP, ROB (R93-33) 235 MERRY -SHIP, ROB - THE MEWS (PP) 442 THE MEWS - ROB MERRY -SHIP (PP) 442 • MILLER, CHERYL & MCFARLAND (R93-35) 239 MILLER, CHERYL & MCFARLAND (R93-35) 477 MILLER, CHERYL & MCFARLAND (R93-35) 491 • MISSION BLVD. SUBDIVISION - WILKINS & VILLINES (FP) 178 MISSION HILLS - L. GLENN & WINIFRED CLARK (FP) 352 MOORE, DR. JAMES (R93-2) 4 MOORE, DR. JAMES - NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE IV (PP) 27 MOORE, DR. JAMES - NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE IV (FP) 224 MOORE, DR. JAMES - NORTHWEST ACRES (PP) 32 MOORE, DR. JAMES (R93-4) 31 MOYER, JERRY (LS#1) 202 NANCHAR, INC - CMN PROPERTIES (CP) 14 NANCHAR, INC - CMN PROPERTIES (PP) 15 NANCHAR, INC - CMN PROPERTIES (FP) 371 NELSON, DUANE - SPRING PARK, PHASE II (PP) 16 NELSON, DUANE & CLARY DEVELOPMENT (CU93-8) 58 NETTLESHIP, DR. MAE - SUNBRIDGE CENTER (PP) 484 NEWHART, VENOMA & CALDWELL (LS#1) 452 NEWHART, VENOMA & CALDWELL (LS#1) 453 NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONERS 19 NIBLOCK & PARTNERS - RIDGEMONTE DOWNS (PP) 172 NIBLOCK & PARTNERS - RIDGEMONTE VIEW (PP) 171 NORTH HILLS CENTER - PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES (LSD) 244 • NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE IV - DR. JAMES MOORE (PP) 27 NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE IV - DR. JAMES MOORE (FP) 224 NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE V - DENNIS SMITH (PP) 142 NOTICE OF APPEAL 29 OWL CREEK - MIKE PENNINGTON (PP) 468 PARKER, MAX (CU93-26) 253 PARKER, MIKE - REMINGTON PLACE (PP) 246 PARKS FEES - DISCUSSION 19 PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES - NORTH HILLS CENTER (LSD) 244 PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES (LS#1) 288 PEARSON, TOM & BAILEY - GEORGIAN PLACE (FP) 252 PENCE & WRIGHT - THE MASTERS (PP) 274 PENCE & WRIGHT - THE MASTERS (PP) 488 PENNINGTON, MIKE (R93-48) 409 PENNINGTON, MIKE - OWL CREEK (PP) 468 PEOPLES, BUDDY & FOSTER - SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE III (PP) 190 PEOPLES, BUDDY & FOSTER - SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE IV (PP) 190 PHILLIPS & ROBLES - RIDGEWOOD SUBDIVISION (FP) 304 PINNECREST - BMP DEVELOPMENT (PP) 47 • PINEVALLEY ADDITION - JAMES POTTS (PP) 72 PINE VALLEY, PHASE I - BMP DEVELOPMENT (FP) 304 • PLANNING COMMISSION TOUR 29 PLANNING WORKSHOP 137 POND, LLOYD & JAMES & PATRICIA POND (R93-7) 36 POND, LLOYD (R93-15) 110 POND, LLOYD (R93-16) 110 POTTS, JAMES - PINEVALLEY ADDITION (PP) 72 PRATT WOODS ADDITION - SASSAFRAS HILL ENT. (FP) 51 PRESTIAGE PROPERTY (R93-3) 20 QUAIL CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE II - MILLER FAMILY TRUST (FP) 251 RATIONAL NEXUS CALCULATIONS 346 R&B VENTURES, INC. (R93-53) 465 REID, ALAN (CU93-25) 231 REMINGTON PLACE - MIKE PARKER (PP) 246 REQUEST FOR STREET NAME CHANGE - COMMERCE DRIVE 447 RETAIL DEVELOPMENT - CEI ENGINEERING (LSD) 81 REZONING & CONDITIONAL USE RQUESTS 349 RIDGEMONTE DOWNS - NIBLOCK & PARTNERS (PP) 172 RIDGEMONTE DOWNS, PHASE I - NIBLOCK & PARTNERS (FP) 193 RIDGEMONTE VIEW - NIBLOCK & PARTNERS (PP) 171 RIDGEMONTE VIEW - NIBLOCK & PARTNERS (FP) 194 RIDGEWOOD SUBDIVISION - PHILLIPS & ROBLES (FP) 304 • ROBLES & PHILLIPS - RIDGEWOOD SUBDIVISION (FP) 304 ROGERS, JAMES (R93-37) 312 ROLLER, NANCY (R93-10) 57 ROLLER, NANCY (CU93-9) 57 ROLLER, NANCY (LS#1) 57 ROSEWOOD HEIGHTS - ALEXANDER -HOUSE REALTY VENTURES (PP) 13 SANG AVENUE APARTMENTS - HECKATHORN PROPERTIES (LSD) 168 SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE III, FOSTER & PEOPLES (PP) 190 SAVANNA ESTATES, PHASE IV, FOSTER & PEOPLES (PP) 190 SECTION 98 - CLOSURE OF STREETS, ALLEYS & EASEMENTS (REVISIONS) 17 SHEWMAKER, RICHARD (PARKING WAIVER) 472 SHIPLEY, CAL & BAILEY (LS#1) 221 SHOFFIT, MARILYN (LS#1) 289 SIDEWALK ORDINANCE 163 SIDEWALK ORDINANCE 342 SIDEWALK ORDINANCE 389 SIDEWALK ORDINANCE 428 SMITH, DENNIS - NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE V (PP) 142 SMITH, DENNIS - NORTHWEST ACRES, PHASE V (PP) 142 SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-28) 198 • SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-29) 198 SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-30) 198 . SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-31) 198 SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-28) 206 SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-29) 206 SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-30) 206 SMITH, DENNIS & CAIN (R93-31) 206 SOUTHWOODS SUBDIVISION - DREW SPURLOCK (PP) 199 SOWDER, GLENN (V93-4) 89 SPECIALTY FASTENING SYSTEMS, INC. (LSD) 7 SPOT NOT CAR WASH - GARY DANDY (LSD) 321 SPRING PARK, PHASE II - DUANE NELSON (PP) 16 SPRING PARK, PHASE II - CLARY DEVELOPMENT (FP) 43 SPRING PARK, PHASE II (LOTS 4,6,8&11) - CLARY DEVELOPMENT (FP) 225 SPRING STREET CENTRE, INC. (R93-21) 166 SPURLOCK, DREW, SOUTHWOODS SUBDIVISION (PP) 199 SPURLOCK, DREW (CU93-20) 212 STARR, JOE FRED - VIEWPOINT ESTATES (PP) 469 STEPHENSON ADDITION - E.L. STEPHENSON (CCP) 50 STERLING ESTATE AKA HILLSIDE TERRACE - H.L. CORNISH (PP) 412 STERLING ESTATES - STERLING INVESTMENTS, LTD. (FP) 475 STERLING INVESTMENTS, LTD - STERLING ESTATES (FP) 475 STREET NAME CHANGE - CENTER STREET 472 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS & DENSITY 338 • SULLAVAN, JOEL & BLACK (V93-6) 196 SUNBRIDGE CENTER - DR. MAE NETTLESHIP (PP) 484 SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES (LSD) 9 SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES - ROBERT BRACY (LSD) 475 SWARTZ, SYLVIA (LS#1) 76 SWARTZ, SYLVIA (LS#2) 76 SWARTZ, SYLVIA (LS#3) 76 SWEETSER, MIKE (V93-3) 42 SWEPCO (CU93-23) 228 SWEPCO (CU93-23) 282 T&K ENTERPRISES (LSD) 449 TAYLOR ESTATES - ESTHER TAYLOR (PP) 46 TAYLOR ESTATES - ESTHER TAYLOR (FP) 304 TAYLOR ESTATES - ESTHER TAYLOR (FP) 306 TAYLOR, ESTHER - TAYLOR ESTATES (PP) 46 TAYLOR, ESTHER - TAYLOR ESTATES (FP) 304 TAYLOR, ESTHER - TAYLOR ESTATES (FP) 306 TELEVISED MEETINGS 205 TELEVISED MEETINGS 233 THE CLIFFS (A PUD) - UNDERWOOD & LINDSEY (CP) 216 • THE MASTERS - WRIGHT & PENCE (PP) 264 THE MASTERS - WRIGHT & PENCE (PP) 488 TIMBERSIDE SUBDIVISION - KEN STAHMAN (PP) 74 TOMLINSON, HAYLEY & GERALD (LS#1) 445 TORNATORE, RICK - WHITE OAK MANOR (PP) 360 TORNATORE, RICK - WHITE OAK MANOR (PP) 381 TRAFFIC GENERATION PLAN 341 TRAIL PLAN 400 TREAT, BOB & DONNA - KAITLYNN MEADOWS (PP) 11 TREE ORDINANCE 29 TREE ORDINANCE 53 TREE ORDINANCE 80 TREE ORDINANCE 95 TREE ORDINANCE 137 TREE ORDINANCE 154 UNDERWOOD, BILL & LINDSEY - THE CLIFFS (A PUD) (CP) UNITED WAY HEADQUARTERS (LSD) 216 323 VIEWPOINT ESTATES, JOE FRED STARR (PP) 469 VILLINES, DANNY & WILKINS - MISSION BLVD. SUBDIVISION (FP) 178 VILLINES, DANNY & WILKINS - CROSSOVER STORAGE (LSD) 259 VILLINES, DANNY & WILKINS - CROSSOVER STORAGE (LSD) 475 VILLINES, DANNY (R93-46) 404 VILLINES, DANNY & WILKINS - CROSSOVER PLAZA (PP) 450 VINES, MARYE K. (CU93-4) 25 WALLACE, RONALD & LINDA (R93-34) 236 WALKER, RALPH - WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION (PP) 222 WALNUT VIEW ESTATES, PHASE I - CASTLE DEVELOPMENT (FP) 201 WALNUT VIEW ESTATES, PHASE II - CASTLE DEVELOPMENT (FP) 304 WASHINGTON COUNTY UNITED WAY (R93-32) 210 WATSON, JIM & DANNY (R93-50) 458 WENTZ, KENNITH & BRENDA (R93-5) 33 WENTZ, KENNITH & BRENDA (CU93-10) 60 WENTZ, KENNETH & BRENDA (LS#2) 60 WEST FAYETTEVILLE CHURCH OF CHRIST - STEVE MILLER (LSD) 8 WEST RIDGE BAPTIST CHURCH (CU93-7) 41 WHEELER, JIM (R93-51) 461 WHEELER, JIM - LYNN -LEIGH HILL ADDITION (PP) 463 WHITE, ALLEN (R93-56) 478 WHITE OAK MANOR - RICK TORNATORE (PP) 360 WHITFIELD, BOB (R93-41) 353 WILD HAWG GRILL - GREG HEGER (LSD) 242 WILKINS, GORDON & VILLINES - MISSION BLVD. SUBDIVISION (FP) 178 WILKINS, GORDON & VILLINES - CROSSOVER STORAGE (LSD) 259 WILKINS, GORDON & VILLINES - CROSSOVER STORAGE (LSD) 475 • WILKINS, GORDON - GLENNBROOK ADDITION, PHASE II (PP) 261 WILKINS, GORDON & VILLINES - CROSSOVER PLAZA (PP) 450 WILLOW SPRINGS ADDITION - RALPH WALKER (PP) 222 WOOD, ROB - ALL RENTS (LSD) 214 WOODLAWN ADDITION - BARRY BAKER (PP) 470 WOODSIDE ADDITION - HAROLD JONES (PP) 482 WRIGHT & PENCE - THE MASTERS (PP) 264 WRIGHT & PENCE, INC. - THE MASTERS (PP) 488 • •