Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-08-10 Minutes• MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was held on Monday August 10, 1987 in the Board of Directors Room of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: Ernie Jacks, Stan Green, Butch Robertson, Gerald Seiff, Julie Nash, Frank Farrish and Fred Hanna MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Sue Madison and B.J. Dow John Ragland, Jerry Allred, Richard Windham, Robert Shultz, Sandra Carlisle and Tessi Franzmeier WAIVER OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (LOT SPLIT) WADE BISHOP - REGENCY NORTH, PHASE II, LOT 11, BLOCK 9 The first item on the agenda was consideration of a waiver of the Subdivision Regulations (lot split) submitted by Wade Bishop and represented by John Ragland. Property located in Regency North, Phase II, Lot 11 Block 9. Property zoned R-2, Medium Density • Residential District. Chairman Jacks asked if anyone would like to speak for or against this request. There being no opposition the public hearing closed and discussion. returned to the Planning Commission. • MOTION Hanna moved to grant the lot split as Nash. The motion to approve as requested requested, seconded by passed 7-0-0. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST - CHILD CARE PATTI DUTTON - 736 E. JACKSON The second item on the agenda was consideration of a request for conditional use for child care, submitted by Patti Dutton. Property located at 736 E. Jackson and zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District. Carlisle explained Mrs.Dutton was unable to attend this meeting, but thought a representative would be present. There was no one present to represent the request. • • Planning Commission August 10, 1987 Page 2 Jacks advised a letter had been submitted from an adjoining property owner by the name of Carolyn De Luic. Carlisle explained the letter stated Ms. De Luic would not object to the request. Seiff felt would not Also Ms. traffic to the explanation should be expanded in that Ms. De Luic object if the number of children remained the same. De Luic recommended a fence in the rear yard with be routed up Lakeside Drive and down Jackson. Carlisle advised Perry Franklin had not had a chance to review the traffic situation, as the letter came in at 4:30 this afternoon. MOTION Robertson moved to table this request until a representative could present this request, seconded by Seiff. The motion to table passed 7-0-0. APPROVAL OF A REPLAT OF A REPLAT OF A FINAL .PLAT - CLOVER CREEK PHASE II, LOT 50 - JERRY ALLRED - SOUTH OF CATO SPRINGS ROAD The third item on the agenda was consideration of a replat of a replat of a final plat for Clover Creek, Phase II, Lot 50 (PUD). Submitted by Jerry Allred and represented by Robert Windham, property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District. Robert Windham advised the original development of Clover Creek was developed by Edmonston Pruitt. He then advised there was a replat of lots 26-49 to redeveloped lots 50-68. Mr. Windham said somewhere down the line this became a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and added the developer was seeking to continue the PUD concept. He said the new developer Jerry Allred had developed this to less than R-1 Density and was like 3.8 dwelling units to the acre. He said the concept was to develope the Subdivision to be in harmony with the surrounding addition. He also said the idea was to provide affordable housing for people in Fayetteville. Jacks asked why this was a PUD, and Mr. Windham said they could get smaller lots. Jacks said the developer was no where near approaching the R-1 Denisty that was allowable, and asked how does the smaller lots come into play. • Mr. Windham said the developers plan was to have some larger lots with private open space. • • Planning Commission August 10, 1987 Page 3 Carlisle explained the proposed replat was already a PUD. Jacks asked if some of the property was in the Flood Plain, and Carlisle advised the west portion of the property was Flood Plain. Seiff asked when the original Subdivision was developed and Mr. Windham advised the first replat was done in 1975. Mr. Windham stated basically the developer was taking one 7.25 acre lot and creating 27 single family residential lots. Jacks then noted the only reason the PUD Ordinance came into play was the developer was allowed to have smaller lots in some cases. Seiff asked the size of the smallest lot and Mr. Windham advised they were shooting for 6000 sq.ft., with some being a tad bit smaller than that. He explained some lots angle on the cul-de- sac and fall short. He said the developer had not really pin- pointed the exact size of each individual lot as yet. MOTION Nash moved to approve the replat of a replat of a final plat of Clover Creek, Phase II, Lot 50, seconded by Seiff. The motion to approve as submitted passed 7-0-0. CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST - ANTIQUE SHOP ROBERT SHULTZ - 347 N. WEST AVENUE The fourth item on the agenda was consideration of request for a conditional use request for an Antique shop submitted by Robert Shultz. Property located at 347 N. West Avenue and zoned I-1, Light Industrial and Heavy Commercial. Jacks advised antique shops at the present time were allowable by a conditional use in any zone in the City. Mr. Shultz said he really did not have anything to add to his request. MOTION Hanna moved to approve the conditional use for an Antique shop as requested, seconded by Seiff. The motion to approve past 7-0-0. • Mr. Shultz advised there was a brick building close by that was very hazardous. He said the building looked as though it was • • • Planning Commission August 10, 1987 Page 4 going to fall down and was concerned about children being hurt. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the July 27, 1987 meeting were approved with the following correction. Page 13, paragraph 2, fourth line, change "but felt they could do it legally." to "but felt they could not do it legally." Page 13, paragraph 1, sixth line, change "nursering" to "nursing" OTHER BUSINESS Carlisle introduced Mr. Dennis Becker who was the representative from the Board of Adjustment to the Planning Commission for this quarter. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 5:17 p.m.