Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-01-14 Minutes• • MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission vas held Monday, January 14, 1985 at 5:10 P.M. in the Board of Director's Boom of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: Newton Hailey, Ernie Jacks, Sue Madison, Fred Hanna, Joe Tarvin, Barbara Crook, Stan Green, and Trey Trumbo MEMBERS ABSENT: Melanie Stockdell OTHERS PRESENT: Planning Consultant Wood, Ervan Wimberly, Gordon Houston, Kenneth Lazenby, Gary Carson, Danny Wright, Roy Hawkins, Southwestern Bell Representative, Jerry Combs, Ken Colvin, Gary Carnahan, Bobbie Jones, Paula Brandeis, members of the press and others The regularly scheduled meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Hailey and the minutes of the December 14, 1984 meeting were considered. MINUTES Ernie Jacks made the following correction: On page 2, second paragraph from the bottom "...the percentage of acreage...could be used to determine the impact..." this is a method of determining a rational nexus. The following additions and corrections were made by Sue Madison: 1. On page 8, fourth paragraph, "...in opposition to the variances..." not the concept plat as stated; 2. page 10 last paragraph; "...there needs to be another street intersecting with Lover's Lane..." should have been "...intersecting with Crossover Road; and 3. Ernie Jacks suggestion that the amendments agreed upon by the Update Committee be given to City Attorney, McCord to draft before the Planning Commission addresses them was omitted. With these corrections and additions, the minutes stood approved. 1 • • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING -REZONING APPEAL 84-20 ZED JOHNSON - 2607 BL1. MISSION The second item on the agenda was a request to rezone the north 450 ft. of property located at 2607 Mission from R-1 to C-2; Public Hearing Rezoning Appeal 84-20 which was tabled at the November 13th and December 10, 1984 meetings. Consultant Wood gave his updated zoning.'report. He said at the December 10th meeting he had recommended C-1 zoning for this property and that recommendation remains the same. Ervan Wimberly was present to represent this appeal. He said that the petitioner will probably return with a request for rezoning of the rear portion of the property to R-0 at a future time and that C-1 was acceptable as suggested. Crook said the proposed U-shaped drive accessing the rear of this property was a good idea and she wondered if the street could be added to the Master Street plan. Wood said it would be considered a local street and not show on the Master Street plan. Wimberly said this property will probably be back within the year with a large scale development plan at which time streets will be considered. MOTION Crook moved approval of this appeal. Seconded by Jacks, the motion to approve passed 8-0-0. PUBLIC HEARING -REZONING APPEAL 85-1 EAST OF PORTER, SOUTH OF DEANE - GORDON HOUSTON The third item on the agenda was Public Hearing on rezoning appeal 85-1 for 5.86 acres located east of Porter Road and South of Deane Street submitted by Gordon Houston; from R-1 to R-2. Consultant Wood gave the following recommendation: He recommended considering the change to R-2 because of the mixed residential character in the area of Porter Road, Deane Street and U.S. Highway 71 making this property suitable for apartment development. In the near future, Wood said he believes the area around the interchange will undergo land use changes not contemplated by the General Plan. He added that the area around this property has been the subject of a special land use study which was not adopted by the Planning Commission. 2 • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 3 Madison asked how this property assumed that Houston would probably He added that although both would idea to have them both. will be accessed and Wood said he use both Porter and Deane as access. not be necessary it would be a good Mrs. Beal, a property owner to the south, said that although she was not opposed to this rezoning, she would like to have assurance that the land would be well -drained. Madison asked Houston how he intends to access the property and he replied that there is a 50 ft. easement off Porter Street (between Lots 12 & 13) and that he could use all of Lot 9 as a drive as well. Chairman Hailey explained that if this property were presented for development it would need to be accompanied by drainage plans. Madison replied bedroom asked how many units could be placed on this parcel and Ms. Jones about 24 per acre (R-2) if they are condominiums, or 21 two units or 25 one bedroom apartments. Madison said she would vote against this rezoning because of the potential for so many units and that she did not care for the access situation. In answer to Green's question, Houston said that there is nothing on Lot 9 now and he added that there is R-2 zoning just north of here. It was determined that approval of a large scale development could be denied if this property were not presented with adequate access or if it presented a traffic hazard. MOTION Jacks commented that in the past, this parcel has been denied rezoning mainly because of opposition which was not present at this time. He moved approval of this appeal. Hanna seconded, followed by discussion. Tarvin asked if anyone lives on Lot 12 or 13; Houston replied that they did. The motion to approve passed 7-1-0, Madison voting "nay". PUBLIC HEARING -REZONING 85-2 1015-1031 N. COLLEGE - KEN LAZENBY The fourth item on the agenda was a Public Hearing on rezoning 85-2 for property located at 1015 and 1031 N. College from R-0 to C-2 by Kenneth Lazenby. 3 • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 4 Consultant Wood gave the following report: In 1971, the City Board initiated a rezoning (R71-10) of all the property on the west side of Highway 471 from Trenton Boulevard to North Street, from R-0 to C-2. The recommendation on R71-10 was to retain all of the property in R-0 district. The basis of the recommendation was the terrain which has caused high retaining walls to be constructed on portions of the west side of Highway 471, terrain and road alignment which creates sight distance problems, narrow width and shallow depth lots and the exposure of the back of the lots to single-family houses on Pollard Avenue. It was felt that if any of the property in this area changed to C-2 District, it would be a precedent for a change in the whole strip and the potential trip generation of C-2 District uses would create a greater traffic hazard. The situation has not changed since 1971, except the traffic volume has increased from approximately 13,000 ADT to 21,000 ADT. It is recommended that the property under application be retained as R-0 District. Madison asked if the shop to the north was an upholstery shop and non -conforming and Jones replied that it is listed as an interior decorator shop and is allowed, as was the adjacent beauty shop which has since left the area. Tom Hecox, 1009 Pollard, stated that he was representing several residents of Pollard Street. He said that when they purchased homes here they had the understanding that the lots behind their homes were zoned R-0 and they are concerned that if these lots were rezoned, as requested, their homes would decrease in value. In addition, Hecox said there is a problem with excess traffic and the litter that the traffic creates. He added that he felt the R-0 lots serve as a buffer between the noise of the highway and the resident's homes and they would like to see it remain R-0. Martha Gannon, 945 Pollard, stated that there is a drainage problem because the lots on N. College are uphill from the residential homes on Pollard and the rainwater rushes down the concreted parking places into backyards. Another resident stated that there is a serious problem with trash and unkept backyards (on N. College) and another resident agreed, saying she preferred the zoning remain as it is. Madison asked if the corner lot has been offered for sale, as she felt it would be ideal as a doctor's office. Lazenby said it hadn't. H • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 5 MOTION Crook said she thought the corner of North and N. College was presently a traffic problem. and that any more intense development would only contribute to the problem with professional offices probably impacting the area the least amount. She moved to recommend denial of this appeal. Seconded by Madison, followed by discussion. Green asked if there were any other property nearby zoned Commercially and Jones replied that property north of North Street and east of College was, as well as that east of College and south of Baxter. She said the R-0 District extends from North Street to Trenton. The motion to recommend denial passed 8-0-0. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL BY GARY CARSON FOR DOWERS ESTATE 1614 EAST HUNTSVILLE ROAD The fifth item on the agenda was a request for a Conditional Use for a duplex in an R-1 District located at 1614 E. Huntsville Road by Gary Carson, attorney for the estate of Jeff Dowers. Chairman Hailey advised that, regardless of the history of this particular case, he felt the issue before the Commission tonight was to decide if this location was suitable for a duplex in R-1 District. Carson, representing the estate of Dowers, stated that in 1981 Dowers built a house that would meet his needs of housing his children in one section of the house and he and his wife the other section. Carson said the late Mr. Dowers was a mechanic and needed a shop building (located in the front of the property) for his work area. The Board of Adjustment granted variances to permit two principal structures on one lot if the shop building would be torn down upon sale, lease or assignment of the land. Carson said the house was a single family residence but was built exactly like a duplex with one unit above the other and no internal connection. He said that the property in question is the only tangible asset of the estate and from which four children need to be supported. Carson said the estate will be tearing down the shop building but the problem is that the property can not be sold unless the house can be used as a duplex. Carson said he thought that if this property cannot be sold it will rot. Danny Wright, attorney representing neighbors in this area, stated that these property owners are opposed to the Dowers house being used as a duplex. He said in 1981, the neighboring residents agreed to the building of a residence on the Dowers property as a non -conforming use in an R-1 zone because Dowers had told them that he was having problems with vandalism as well as economics He said that Dowers 5 Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 6 had also told the residents that he would change professions within a few years and tear down the shop leaving only a residence. Wright said Dowers had also promised Chester Grigsby, a neighbor, that he would build a retaining wall with a fence between them which never came to pass. Wright says there is problem in that the neighbors perceive what appears to be several different families living in the dwelling at this time. He said the neighbors are also afraid of the fire potential in the shop. He noted that a suit has been filed by the City to remove the shop building (October, 1984). He stated that the estate now wishes to sell what was to never have been constructed in the first place in order to salvage the economics of the estate. Wright said the surrounding neighborhood is all R-1 and the neighbors would like to keep it that way and are concerned that allowing a con- ditional use would open a path for similar cases in this area. Hailey asked if there are any existing duplexes either on Sherman or Highway 16 and Wright replied that there is one on Sherman and Attorney Carson said there is one on Highway 16 as well. It was determined that the duplex is on 5th Street at Happy Hollow and not Sherman Madison said she had driven by this neighborhood and thought that there was a commercial -type building to the west and a service station to the east, a mixed character neighborhood. She said she thought that because Highway 16 is an arterial street it is not the most suitable for R-1 development and she did not see a problem with a duplex here. Crook advised that this issue needed to be considered fresh as to whether or not the Commission will grant a conditional use for a duplex. Green inquired about the commercial building to the west of Dower's and Jones replied that it is zoned R-1 but Wright said it has been vacant for over 6 months. Green agreed with Madison regarding medium density residential being appropriate on the highway and he said it was now a matter of relative risk and that he would be more concerned if the structure were to stand vacant for a long period of time. Wright repeated that the neighbors would prefer to maintain the R-1 district with no duplexes. He said these neighbors are also very dismayed that a person could secure permission to build a single family residence and then completely disregard this by building a duplex and come back to the City with a request to approve the action. Green said that it seemed to him that the Bill of Assurance was an integral part of the deal that Dowers had struck and that he was hard pressed to say that it is fair to allow someone to do something that was a mistake in the first place and then ask the Planning Commission to approve of it after the fact. He added that he thought it was borderline to ask for a duplex in this case because although duplexes are suitable along the highway, it is in the middle of R-1 and has been too much of an on-going situation with the neighbors objecting 6 • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 7 strongly. He said if the neighbors didn't object that he might consider approving this request. Tarvin agreed with Green saying that the change is not justified. Madison said that, considering the issue as if it were the beginning and this much opposition was voiced from the neighbors, she might not approve of it. Wright went on to explain that there was not enough room for the two buildings on this property and that with the neighbors agreement in hand, Dowers went to the Board of Adjustment to ask for a variance in the building setback with the understanding that the shop would be torn down at a later date. He said these residents made a good faith agreement and have been let down. Carson explained that there was a variance allowing two principal structures on one lot. He pointed out that Dowers submitted building plans to the Inspection Department and relied on their approval when he proceeded with the construction. He commented that the children of the late Mr. Dowers are the ones to suffer from a mistake they did not make. Madison suggested connecting the first and second floor but Carson said he could not see where in the structure this could be done. Wright said that most of the Dowers' children are grown and Carson stated that three of the children are under the age of 18. Jones advised that the variances granted by the Board of Adjustment involved allowing a 10 ft. rear building setback instead of the required 20 ft. and allowing two principal structures on a single lot. She said the application for building permit states "single family". Crook said she will look at this case as to whether or not she would allow a conditional use for a duplex on this lot. She said there may always be opposition from neighbors for duplexes but she said she prefers duplexes scattered in R-1 neighborhoods rather than lined up along streets. She said it is unfortunate but beside the point that this case has got to where it is in the way that it has and she would be inclined to vote for granting conditional use for duplex on this lot. Mr. Roscoe Slaughter, 548 Sherman, asked if agreements are made and not kept, what purpose did the Commission serve. Crook said she thought this was the first time the Commission has examined this particular request. 7 Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 8 Madison asked for a show of hands of residents of the immediate area that are opposed to this request. There were six responses. One resident said there are three or four more neighbors who are opposed but could not attend this evening's meeting. Hailey said that since 1978, the neighbors in this area have done marvelous things to improve and maintain their properties. He said he trusted their judgement, considering the track record of what they have accomplished. MOTION Crook moved approval of the conditional use request. The motion died for lack of a second. MOTION Green moved to deny approval of the condition use. Hanna seconded and Green said he wished to clarify that he was not insinuating that the Inspection Department had made a mistake. The motion to deny approval of a conditional use passed 7-1-0, Crook voting "nay". CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST BY SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE WEST SIDE OF STARR RD. SOUTH OF HWY.45 The sixth item on the agenda was a request for conditional use by Southwestern Bell Telephone for property located on the west side of Joe Fred Starr Road 700 ft. south of Highway 45. The area has been approved for a Planned Unit Development by Jerry Sweetser. A letter was distributed to Commissioners just prior to this meeting from SWEPCO stating that they have no objection to this particular installation. In answer to Madison's question, Bell's representative stated that the size of the proposed building is 10 X 13 sitting on concrete pad 20 X 20. Madison asked if approving this request would change anything in the PUD that surrounds it. Jones advised that Sweetser has not built anything on this particular' section of the PUD since the approval but he has built on the portion - to the south of this in Sequoyah Woods. Ernest Stanberry, owner of property east of Starr Road, stated that he is not opposed to this request but was wondering what the exterior of the building would be composed of. The Bell representative explained that the building is pre—fabricated and covered with brick veneer with a pitch roof similar to the neighboring condominiums. Stanberry g Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 9 asked why it would look only similar and not exactly like the condos and the rep said it would be as close as possible but could not be exact because of the differences in the scale of the building. Roy Hawkins, engineer with Southwestern Bell said the initial installation will take quite some time. He explained part of the installation and said that because of the cost of materials they will install the equipment in the new building as it is required over a two year basis. He continued that, once the equipment is installed and in working order, there would probably be a man out there once a week to insure that everything is working. Hawkins said that in two years there would be another installation crew that will add equipment at which time they will enter another two year cycle. He said at certain times there may be someone in the building every day for a period of three week followed by a period of a year or two when no one will be present. Stanberry expressed his concern regarding the possibility of additional traffic generated by telephone personnel and Hawkins explained that there will be no one permanently stationed at this facility. Hawkins said that the type of equipment being installed requires less maintenance than anything used before and he added that the less personnel employed, the better for Southwestern Bell. Madison asked if there were anything about the proposed lighthouse that could pose a danger to small children. Hawkins said that it will be fed with light guy cable buried 36" deep but that if a child got into the building, they could suffer eye damage if they were to look directly into a fiber. He added that the building will be locked although there will be no surrounding fence. He said the possibility of a child entering this building was very remote and that a security alarm goes off automatically if the door is opened. Madison said, because this is a residential neighborhood, she would like to see landscaping on three sides instead of the two sides as shown. Sweetser said that Bell has agreed to let him supervise the planting (or plant landscaping himself) if he desired because he is the adjoining property owner. He said he is in favor of landscaping. MOTION Jacks moved approval of this conditional use request. Seconded by Tarvin, the motion passed 8-0-0. 9 • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 10 REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT JERRY WAYNE COMBS CITY LAKE RD SOUTH OF PUMP STATION The seventh item on the agenda was a request for a waiver of subdivision regulations for property located 1/2 mile south of Pump Station Road west of City Lake Road by Jerry Combs. Combs was present to speak for this request. He stated that he thought when he bought this property that everything was in order. Combs said he originally bought Tract "C" and "D" as a single one -acre parcel together with a friend who later wanted his half -acre deeded separately. He said his land partner ended up with Tract "C" less a roadway 15' wide along the north side for access to Tract "D" both of which belong to Combs. Chairman Hailey advised that the issue to be addressed here was two lot splits and a waiver of the requirement that all property have public road frontage. Crook inquired as to how this situation came about and Jones replied that a realtor had phoned the Planning Office to inquire about one of the tracts involved and when the legal description was given, Jones said she found it did not agree with the plat book. After some research, it was found that these lot splits have been recorded in the Court House but the City was not informed. In answer to Madison's question, Jones said she has not applied the Green Space fee to those actions taken before the adoption of the ordinance which would require it. Madison said she was opposed to having a lot without frontage on a public street. Combs said this land has already been split off and he is trying to have these splits approved. He indicated that he has a deeded access across Tracts "B" and "C" but Jones said the legal descriptions supplied to her do not indicated any easement across Tract "B" although Combs may own said access by adverse possession. Jones reminded the Commission that the ordinance does not allow a tandem lot behind a tandem lot. Madison said she had spoken with the City Attorney and he had advised her that the fact that this land has already been split should not be taken into consideration but that it should be considered on its own merits. Crook asked what would happen if this split were not approved and Jones replied that she didn't feel she could issue any building permits for Tract "B", "C" or "D". Combs said he wasn't sure if he would ever build on any of the tracts but had considered selling it. jo • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 11 Hanna asked if these lots were on sewer service or could have a septic system installed. Combs said that sewer and water were available on City Lake Road and Jones said Combs could build on his lots with a septic tank permit because the acre and one-half requirement did not apply until 1976. Green asked Jones what would be required to make these splits legal and Jones replied that the Commission would need to approve the lot splits that have already taken place and waive the requirement of public street frontage for all lots. She said the 15 ft. easement along the north side of Tracts "A" and "B" is not covered in either deed. Green asked for the specific requirements that would have to be addressed and waived for access and Jones replied that the ordinance says that a lot must have frontage on a public street unless it is waived by the Planning Commission. (She cited the section of Fayetteville code pertaining to this issue). She said that the section of code which refers to tandem lots requires a 25 ft. access strip and states that there cannot be a tandem lot behind a tandem lot. Jones said that the property must be accessible to fire protection and sanitation vehicles. She added that this parcel lies downhill from Country Hill Estates with another piece of very steep land between the subdivision and Combs' Tract "D". Crook asked Jones if she could issue a building permit if only Tract "B" were in question and Jones replied that if Combs had title to the 15 ft. strip across Tract "A" she would. Crook next asked if Tract "B" could be split off from "C" and "D" and Jones replied that there would still be an access problem. MOTION Crook made a motion to approve a lot split which would split Tract "B" from the two acres west of Tract "A". The motion died for lack of a second. Madison said she would not like to approve this request if it meant that building on Tract 'B" precluded ever having access to Tracts "C" and "D". MOTION Green advised that, even if Combs did not already have access through "B", he could dedicate access at this time to Tract "C" which has dedicated access to Tract "D". In view of this, Green moved approval of the lot splits executed in 1973 and a waiver of public road frontage for Tracts "C" and "D". Hanna seconded followed by discussion. • Crook said she would vote against this because of her concern regarding other tandem lot situations that are more demanding. If • • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 12 Madison said she would vote against it because she felt that it would be a subdivision by lot split without benefit of improvements. The motion to approve this request passed 6-2-0, Crook and Madison voting "nay". CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST FOR PLANT NURSERY KEN COLVIN - 4674 NORTH COLLEGE The eighth item on the agenda was a request for conditional use for C-2 District property located at 4674 N. College by Ken Colvin for a plant nursery which is a conditional use City wide. MOTION Jacks moved approval of this request, seconded by Tarvin, the motion to approve 8-0-0. REPORT FROM SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE The ninth item on the agenda was a report from the Subdivision Committee on their special meeting on December 19, 1985. Madison advised that Howard Scott's Mini -Warehouses were approved contingent upon a performance bond being secured by him for off-site improvements to the east side Beechwood on his property frontage. She indicated that he has not secured this bond, which needs approval of the City Board, as of this date. Madison said that Law -Quad Apartments by Jeremy Hess on Sycamore had been approved as presented and the Lindsey Office Complex on Joyce had been approved with one change in plans on the northwest corner. Tarvin commented that he had learned at the committee meeting that the off-site improvements included the widening of Beechwood by adding a strip which he thought was worse than not widening at all. Green said he was concerned with whether or not the off-site improvements had been determined on a rational nexus basis. Hanna asked how a performance bond could be secured without having a definition of what the improvements would be and Madison said that the definition was "...100% of the cost of improving Beechwood for 180 ft. along Scott's property frontage..." and she added that Scott had been given an estimate for said cost at that meeting. She added that the Committee favored a performance bond because it was an easier instrument to call than a Bill of Assurance although some doubt had been expressed by Jones as to whether a performance bond could be had for this case. 12 • • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 13 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF GREEN SPACE ORD. CHESTNUT APTS. - CHESTNUT AVE. BY LINDSEY The tenth item on the agenda was a request for a waiver of the Green Space Ordinance on Chestnut Apartments on Chestnut Avenue by Lindsey Construction Company, Gary Carnahan representing. Jones read from the Green Space Ordinance the conditions under which a waiver or variance may be considered (Art.III, Sec.A,[1][k][5][a-f]). Carnahan said that at this time Lindsey would like to withdraw the request for a waiver and consider, instead, the donation of three acres of land from this development (Art.III, Sec.A, [1] [k] [1]). He added that after attending a meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, he felt that their attitude was to not accept any donation except cash and that the ordinance was not being carried out as it was intended. There was much discussion of this ordinance and several interpretations that could be made Jacks, one of the original members of the committee that produced this ordinance, said that he felt the intent of the ordinance was to serve the public with public park land, not private facilities. Crook said she thought that approving a waiver in this case would be substituting the developer for the City in the role of arbitrator for where our parks will be located. Jacks explained that the exceptions that have been made have been cases where the residents of a development would not impact any public facility because of certain limitations; he cited Butterfield Trail Village and a develop- ment created by a group of paraplegics in which the residents had unique recreational needs met by their own facilities. Discussion ensued as to what constituted previously platted land. MOTION Crook made a motion to table this request and 1. ask the City Board to determine if the Green Space Ordinance applies to this property as it had been platted previous to the passage of the ordinance and 2. if it does apply, that this request be brought before the Parks Board to determine whether the proposed three acre donation complies with their long range plans; and, 3. that the Board determine where the cut-off is going to be in terms of previously platted or previously developed subdivisions. Madison seconded, followed by discussion. Carnahan said he would like the City Board to give the Parks Board some criteria for the Green Space Ordinance and Crook suggested that he appear before the Board with this request. The motion to table this request passed 8-0-0. 13 • • • Planning Commission January 14, 1985 Page 14 BRADFORD PLACE - GARLAND & ERNIE JACKS BLVD. REQUEST TO BUILD BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED The eleventh item on the agenda was a request by the developers of Bradford Place (proposed 120 units on Garland and Ernie Jacks Blvd.) to build 35 units, a swimming pool and a community building before installing off-site improvements (Ernie Jacks Blvd.). Carnahan said that Lindsey would like to place a temporary ingress/egress on Garland to serve the 35 units and postpone the street improvement. Madison noted that similar permission had been granted to Woodland Hills development on Wedington Drive west of Garland (to forego improving James Street until either 40 units had been built or a year had passed). MOTION Jacks made a motion to approve this request. Seconded by Hanna, the motion to approve passed 8-0-0. OTHER BUSINESS ORIENTATION MEETING: Chairman Hailey announced a special meeting of the Planning Commission which will take place on Monday, January 21 at 5:00 P.M. in Room 111 to discuss several items that need clarifi- cation. NOMINATING COMMITTEE: Hailey appointed a Nominating Committee consisting of Ernie Jacks, Stan Green and Melanie Stockdell with Jacks serving as Chairman. RESOLUTION: Hailey made a motion that the Planning Department draft a resolution recognizing Dr. David Williams tenure as a member of the Planning Commission and the Update Committee. Seconded by Tarvin, the motion passed 8-0-0. CLOSING OF RAZORBACK ROAD: Madison expressed her concern regarding the closing of Razorback Road for three months. Crook said she had spoken with members of a steering committee at the University and that they had advised her that they had worked things out with the City's Street Department. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 P.M. IM PAGE SUBJECT DATE 2 Zed Johnson (Rez. 84-20 - 2607 Blk. Mission) 01-14-85 to .2 Gordon Houston (Rez. 85-1 - E. of Porter, S. of Deane) 01-14-85 III3 Ken Lazenby (Rez. 85-2 - 1015-1031 N. College) 01-14-85 5 Gary Carson for Dowers Estate (CU - 1614 E. Huntsville Rd.) 01-14-85 8 Southwestern Bell Telephone (CU - W. side of Starr Rd., S. of Hwy 45) 01-14-85 10 Jerry Wayne Combs (Lot Split - City Lake Rd., S. of Pump Station) 01-14-85 12 Ken Colvin (CU - Plant Nursery - 4674 N. College) 01-14-85 12 Report from Subdivision Committee 01-14-85 13 Chestnut Apts. (Req. for Waiver of Gr. Sp. - Chestnut Ave. by Lindsey) 01-14-85 14 Bradford Place - Garland P, Ernie Jacks Blvd. (Req. to build) 01-14-85 14 Nominating Committee (Ernie Jacks, Stan Green P, Melanie Stockdell) 01-14-85 14 Closing the Razorback Road 01-14-85 15 State Law - General Purpose of Planning 01-21-85 17 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 01-21-85 19 Office Processing and Fees 01-21-85 22 Descussion of Previously Platted Property (RE: Chestnut Apts.) 01-21-85 22 Discussion on Preparation for Meetings 01-21-85 23 Discussion on Washington Regional Medical Center 01-28-85 27 A.W. Realty Co. (Rez. R85-3 - Joyce St. F, Old Missouri) 01-28-85 31 A.W. Realty Co. (Rez. R85-4 - Joyce St. & Old Missouri) 01-28-85 31 Wade Bishop (Lot Split - Regency N. Sub. Lt. 9 Blk. 9 ) 01-28-85 32 Wade Bishop (Lot Split, Ph. II - Lots 8 $ 9 Blk 10 F, Lots 18,19,20F21 Blkll)01-28-85 32 Lindsey Construction (Butterfield Trail Office Condos - LSD) 01-28-85 32 Discussion of the Green Space Ordinance 01-28-85 33 Bob Brandon (649 Wilson - State Hwy Proj.#Z142-1$2, N. St. $ N. Gregg St.) 01-28-85 35 Election of Officers for 1985 (Report from Nominating Committee) 02-11-85 36 Warren Cotner (Rez..R85-5 - Hwy 112 NW of the Bypass) 02-11-85 III8 Carol McDaniels (CU - 2607 Old Wire Rd.) 02-11-85 ,9 Lifestyles (Lot Split F, LSD - Sycamore and Porter Rd.) 02-11-85 39 Carpet Cabin (LSD - 3246 S. School) 02-11-85 40 Woodland Hills (Req. for app. of changes Wedington W. of Garland) 02-11-85 41 Discussion of Proposed Ordinance Amendments as Recom. by the Update Commit.)02-11-85 44 Req. to examine land use plan in area Hwys. 265 and 45 02-11-85 45 Warren Cotner (Rez. R85-5 - Hwy 112 NW of Bypass) 02-25-85 51 B.R. Peoples (Waiver of DSZ - 2487 Bristol Place) 02-25-85 52 Revisions for Chestnut II Apartments 02-25-85 52 Lifestyles (Waiver of GSO - Sycamore W. of Porter) 02-25-85 53 The Greenspace Ordinance (RE: Cut -Off date) 02-25-85 S4 Discussion of Ordinance Amendments 02-25-85 SS Appointment of Subdivision Committee, 02-25-85 55 Dis. of Memo from Mr. Grimes (RE: Greenspace Ordinance) 02-25-85 64 Warren Cotner (Rez. R85-5 - Hwy 112 NW of Bypass) 03-11-85 67 Clarence Payne (Rez. R8S-6 - Hwy 265 $ 16 East) 03-11-85 70 Libby Simmons (Rez. R85-7 - Zion Rd East of Hwy 71) 03-11-85 71 Libby Simmons (Lot Split - Zion Rd East of Hwy 71) 03-11-85 72 McNaughton (Lot Split P, Waiver of\F. on a public Rd - W. Side of Hwy 71) 03-11-85 72 Discussion of PRAB Recommendation on Parks Plans, 03-11-85 73 Land use study for the area of Hwy 112 N. of Hwy 71 03-11-85 73 Report on Land use study for the area of Hwys 265 8 45 03-11-85 75 AW Realty (Rez. R85-4 - N. Side of Joyce St.) 03-25-85 79 Lindsey Office Complex (LSD - Joyce St. W. of Old Missouri) 03-25-85 80 Kenneth Horn (Rez. R85-8 - South Side of Drake Field) 03-25-85 s X80 C.E. Yerton (Rez. R85-9 - 3345 South School) 03-25-85 81 First Nat'l Bank of Talequah (Rez. R85-10 - Huntsville Rd at Sherman) 03-25-85 81 Robert Melton (Waive of DSZ - Country Way at Ferguson Ave.) 03-25-85 PAGE SUBJECT 82 Keith Cearly (City Board's req. that Planning Commission examine land \` use $ zoning in the Hwy 265 and 45 area) • J Howell Trumbo Office/Retail Complex (Front St. - Vantage Sq. Subdivision) d3 Richard's Furniture (College at Drake Street) 83 Consideration of three Ordinance Amendments - ART. III APP. C 86 Rational Nexus (Interpretation of the term req. by Commissioners) 95 Cart Behner (Table Rez. Petition - 308/310 West Mountain) 96 Bert Rakes for Harry Tunstill (City Initiated Rez. - 1500 S. College) 96 J.B. Hays (Rez. R85-11 - Masonic Dr. $ Hwy 71) 98 Thelma Pond $ Mary Alice Stastny (Rez. R85-12 - 1148 W. Cleveland -RI to P1) 99 Bryce Davis (Walnut Grove - Preliminary Plat - Wedington Dr.) 102 Hoyt Greenwood (LSD - Spee -Dee Mart - Wedington Dr./Rupple Rd.) 104 Hoyt Greenwood (Preliminary Plat - Spee -Dee Mart - Hwy 62 $ Razorback Rd) 105 Use Plan for Hwy. 265 $ 45 (Comprehensive Land) 109 Collis Geren (Waiver of MLW & Lot Split) 110 Ratio of Parking to Sq. Footage in Furniture Stores (Ordinance Amendment) 110 Performance Bond to Bill of Assurance (Req. Change) 112 Carl Behner (Appeal R85-13 - NW Corner Mountain $ Locust) 113 Hoyet Greenwood (LSD - Spee -Dee Mart, Hwy 16 at Rupple Rd.) 113 Bobby Marks (Appeal R85-14 - S. Side of Prospect at Gregg) 116 B. Block/S. Bates (Lot Split - 2033 S. Ashwood) 116 Dennis Home Furnishings (LSD - 3525 S. School) 116 Ralph. Gray (Woodland Hills - W. Wedington, W of Garland) 117 Screening Requirement 1917 Green Acres Road 117 First. Pentecostal Church of God (1355 Morningside Dr. - Sidewalk B/A) 118 Discrepancy between Tip and Master street plan 119 Sam Mathias (LSD - 3416-3422 N. College at Masonic) III 9 Discussion of Extension of Township Road .8 Hoyet Greenwood (Spee -Dee Mart - Wedington at Rupple Rd. - LSD) 129 First Nat's Bank of Tahlequah (Rez. R85-10 - NE Corner E. Huntsville Rd) 132 Lemar Pettus (CU - 246 E. Sixth St. at Willow) 134 Wade Bishop (Rez. R85-15 - S. Side of Appleby Rd., 1000'.E. of Gregg) 134 Wade Bishop (Prel. Plat - S. of Appleby Rd, 1000' E. of Gregg Ave.) 138 LBE, Jack Edmiston (Rez. R85-16 - Lots 1,9$10, Blk 10) 140 Thomas Pugh Const. (Waiver of DSZ -3248 Charing Cross) 140 First Nat'l bank of Tahlequah (Re -Pet. for Rez. - NE corner Huntsville) 141 Larry Wood (Parking Study - NW Ark. Regional Planning Commission) 142 Bed 6 Breakfast Inn's, Bobbie Jones, Planning Administrator 144 Update Committee Findings, Bobbie Jones, Planning Administrator 147 Washington Co. American Red Cross (Rez. R85-17 - Millsap Rd. E. of Hwy 471) 148 Quail Creek Addition (RE: Excessive culs-de-sac $ Waivers) 153 Bert Rakes (Duplex CU.- 1700 Oakcliff) 154 George Kovatch (Duplex CU Req. - W. of the N. End of Lisa Ln.) 155 Donna Carothers (CU - Child Care - 1906 E. Lee St. ) 156 J.B. Hays (LSD - Park Place Rec Area - Hwys 265 & 45) 156 Kenneth $ Ella Caudle (Waiver of Subd. Reg. - Near Crossover & Wyman Rds.) 156 Sandy Behimer (Care Facility in use unit 4 - Res. Long-term) 157 Info. Item - Resolution Req. Recons. of Quail Creek Subdivision 157 Appointment of Committee for the Aged 158 Amending Code to Include Video and Other Games 159 J.B. Hays (Rez. R85-18 - 7.52 Acres S. of Mt. Comfort Rd. at Salem Rd.) 162 J.B. Hays, Michelle Addition (Mt. Comfort Rd. E. $ W. of Salem Rd.) 54 Joe Fred Starr (CU - Radio Tower - Frontage Rd.) • ^r H.H. Hudgens (CU - Tandem Lot & Lot Split - Hootowl Lane) �S Wood Ave. Baptist Church (CU - W. Side of Crossover Rd. at Wyman Rd.) DATE 03-25-85 03-25-85 03-25-85 03-25-85 03-25-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 '04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-08-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 04-22-85 05-13-85 05-13-85 05-13-85 05-13-85 05-13-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 05-28-85 06-10-85 06-10-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 06-24-85 07-08-85 07-08-85 07-08-85 07-08-85 07-08-85 07-08-85 PAGE SUBJECT DATE 166 Taco Bell (Waiver of DSZ - 1772 N. College) Abundant Life Fellowship (Deferral of off-site imp: - 1855 Porter Rd.) 41,17 J.B. Hays (Pk Place Ph. III 0 IV Final Plat - Hwy 45 at Hwy 265) 169 J.B. Hays (R85-18 - 7.52 Acres - Mt. Comfort Rd. E. of Salem Rd.) 170 Joe Fred Starr (CU - Radio Tower $ Station - Frontage Rd. Adj. Jim Ray 170 Report from the Committee on the Aged 170 Merryship (Waiver of Subd. Reg. - County Rd. 87, Old Wire Rd.) 171 Church (CU - W. Side of Crossover at Wyman Rd. Intersection) 172 Keith Robbins (R85-19 - 4748 & 4790 E. Huntsville Rd.) 172 Keith Robbins (Waiver of Subd. Reg. - 4748 G 4790 E. Huntsville Rd.) 172 Winwood Church (Lot Split - Township at_Winwood) 173 Jim Shcoolcraft (CU - Bible Study - 608 N. Garland) 174 Butterfield lbailVillage (CU - Truman Yancy - Temp. Real Estate Office) 174 Sweetser (Prel. Plat - Cedar Creek - E. of Old Wire Rd.) 175 H.H. Hudgens (Waiver of Subd. Reg. - Hoot Owl Ln.) 176 Addendum to Cedar Creek 177 Hugh Kincaid for Walker -Stone Townhouses (Approval of Off -Site 178 Larry Wood (Commit. for Study of Area Bounded by Hwy 112 N.) 178 Letter .of Resignation from Commissioner Frank Burggraf 180 Joe Fred Starr (CU - Radio Tower F, Station -(;Frontage Rd.) 181 Rick Faires (Rez. R85-21 Earthworks - 33.26 Acres - NE Cor. of 185 L.P. g H.B. Johnson (R85-22 - 7.04 Acres - S. of 6th, W. of 71 187 Bill Stiles (R85-20 - 40 Acres - 1934 E. Huntsville Rd.) 188 R. Lynn Waldren (Lot Split - 3/4 mile N. of Wedington Dr. on County Rd 882)08-12-85 188 Mistletoe Express 676 W. Ash (Waiver of DSZ $ MDW) 08-12-85 189 James A. Pennington (Waiver of Subd. Reg. - 10 E. Township(.92 Acres)) 08-12-85 189 Delvin J. Nation (Waiver of Subd. Reg. - Crossover Rd. S. of City Fire St.) 08-12-85 Butterfield Trail Office Condos (Waiver of SR - E. Joyce St.) 08-12-85 :.e Amendments to Ordinances - APP.A, APP.C, F, CHAP. 18 SEC. 18-28 08-12-85 191 Happy Hollow Elementary School (LSD - 300 S. Ray Ave.) 08-12-85 191 Washington Elementary School (LSD - 426 N. Highland Ave.) 08-12-85 192 Asbell School (LSD - Sang N. of Lewis) 08-12-85 193 Hoyet Greenwood (RE: Drainage prob. along State Hwy 16 W. at Rupple Rd.) 08-12-85 Parking) 112 & 71 Bypass) 07-08-85 07-08-85 07-08-85 07-22-85 Pont)07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 07-22-85 08-12-85 Byp)08-12-85 08-12-85 08-12-85 Y r C H Z j Z K tr1 z� aC) el n tno E nccn loom oo 0 0 z Dec. o Ult Nov. 12 Oct. 28 Oct 14 bN Z ppm lYt +`t R N C m 'C t (C)CON August 26 August 12 1 C - N G - G . N 00 01 4� \ `` X _ \ C C \ X w 0 < <`\*;x<<\\0 N )0 k4 ks , Hanna \ \ \ \ C` \ C \ \ z ladison Green 1 \\`\\ �\ C >c \` \ \ \ \X \ v x \ w K z _ t >i \ \ C \ \, w y Uo H w rn C C C ( r, i p t Y r C H Z j Z K tr1 z� aC) el n tno E nccn loom oo 0 0 z 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 D • m z D z c z z rni7 o rn n H 0 n cn \o O Cn m N 0 0 O z C4 y m A '. to W V June 10, 1985 May 4, 1985 May 13, 1985 April 8, 1985 April 22; 1985 March 25, 1985 3 H n I. (0 t0 00 N February 25, 1985 February 11, 1985 January 28, 1985 cy G w N H (0 Go 00 N January 14, 1985 X \ \ \ \ )( \ \ \ )( \ \ \\ x \ k \ ` \ \ \ \ \ )< >< >< ` k k \ \ \ \ \ X \ \ ` \\ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ S \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ k k \ \ \ \ \ k >c \ \ \/ k \ \ k \ \ \ 0. 4'it At 4 L bc,: 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 D • m z D z c z z rni7 o rn n H 0 n cn \o O Cn m N 0 0 O z