HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-01-10 MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
A meeting of the Planning Commission was held at 5:00 P.M. on Monday,
January 10, 1983 in Room 107 of the Continuing Education Center, Fayetteville,
Arkansas.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ernest Jacks, Morton Gitelman, Newton Hailey, Jr.,
Windell Cullers, Jialie Nash, Don Hunnicutt, David Williams,
Melanie Stockdell and Barbara Crook
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
None
Jim Lindsey, Gary Carnahan, Ginger Parker Crisp, Sue Madison,
Bernard Madison, B. J. Dow, Kim Hendren, Dwayne McChristian,
Bill Mandrell, John Everett, Bobbie Jones, Suzanne Kennedy,
members of the press and others.
The Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of MINUTES
December 13, 1982 were approved as mailed.
This item was a request by Jim SIDEWALK AND PATHWAY DESIGN
Lindsey for approval of the sidewalk HYLAND PARK SUBDIVISION
and pathway design in the Hyland Park JIM LINDSEY
Subdivision. Lindsey was present.
Chairman Ernest Jacks said this item was
tabled at the November 22, 1982 Planning Commission meeting and tabled again at
the December 13, 1982 Planning Commission meeting with the requirement that the
City Attorney find out (1) if the '!Hyland Park Sidewalk and Pathway Specifications"
are legal and a part of our ordinance and where it was approved; (2) if Clayton
Powell approved those specifications, we should make an inspection of the area
with the specs in hand for Phases 3, 4 and 5; and (3) if the specs were not
approved, that McCord report back to the Commission. Jacks quoted from a letter
written by the City Attorney, Jim McCord, dated January 4, 1983, in which he
stated "it is my opinion that only the use of cross ties and asphalt or gravel
was approved, i.e., the use of the natural surface as a pathway meeting sidewalk
requirements has not been approved."
Jim Lindsey stated that immediately after the 12-13-82 Planning Commission
meeting lie reviewed the pathways and found some of the deficiencies to be
obvious, such as water seepage. He said he began graveling pathways in advance
of the 1-4-83 letter written by the City Attorney. He said he thought it should
be understood that a developer initially draws a line on one side of the street
or the other where he wishes the sidewalk to be and if the developer still owns
the lot five years later, he builds the sidewalk in that location. He said on
10-10-77 the Planning Commission recommended to the Board of Directors that
because of terrain, sidewalks be waived for Hyland Park. (Bobbie Jones clarified
here that this action was on the Revised Preliminary Plat for Phases 4, 5 and 6.)
Lindsey said the Board of Directors subsequently denied the recommendation.
Lindsey said it was his feeling that his building of the pathways caused him to
take on an extra expense and he did it because he thought "it would make it a
better deal". He pointed out he built all the sidewalks on the top of Hyland
Park (Phase 2) because those lots had frontage of 250 to 300 feet. He thinks
you cannot build sidewalks on the high side of the streets without a retaining
wall He stated he is willing to gravel and place cross ties all throughout
Planning Commission
January 10, 1983
Page Two
the subdivision at what he thinks will be a substantial expense. He asked
that the neighbors get together and decide on which side of the street
sidewalks would be acceptable to everyone and stated, if they would partici-
pate, he would build sidewalks on every vacant lot (he then stated he thinks
he owns about 1/3 of those lots). He admits what is there is inadequate
and hopes to change things so that the situation is acceptable He said, in
his opinion, sidewalks can be built in advance on the street but it will create
additional grade problems and sidewalks are going to get torn up during housing
construction. He said if the sidewalks are built after the fact, the developer
or individual lot owners would have to put the sidewalks in.
Windell Cullers said he thinks it always has been intended that sidewalks
should be an additional expense for any subdivision and said that he thought
that at the time Lindsey went before the Board, the Board had been waiving
sidewalks for others and that, not too long after that, the Board began to
require sidewalks in almost every case.
Lindsey did not agree that it should always be at the developer's expense,
but it should be at the expense of whomoever owns the lot after five years.
There was further discussion of the problems involved with building a flat
sidewalk on steep and hilly terrain. Lindsey stated if he was to have to build
sidewalks, in his opinion it will have to be on the uphill sides of the lots
where you can cut rather than fill.
Melanie Stockdell said she thought Lindsey's intent from the beginning has
been the same as the intent of the subdivision regulation, in that he did not want
to do anything that would nullify the effect of the subdivision regulation on
sidewalks. She said she thought the real issue was the clarification of what was
and was not approved.
Jacks stated the City Attorney has essentially agreed with the Planning
Commission that they have approved an alternative to sidewalks along the streets
and the only question was what the surfacing was to be, and apparently McCord
agreed with what Jacks thought, that the Planning Commission never really
intended only a cleared area for the pathways
Ginger Parker Crisp, resident of Hyland Park, said she was astounded to
discover there was supposed to be a pathway behind her house, because there is
not. She stated she is concerned about the safety of the children who need to
walk to the bus and whose alternative is to walk in the street and said she
sees no reason why sidewalks are not possible to build along her section of the
street (Hyland Park Road). She said she understood when a subdivision is built,
sidewalks are required of the developer in order to obtain approvals. She said
she understood the waiver was conditioned upon the pathway development, to be
with cross ties and asphalt or gravel, the expense to be borne by the developer.
She asked Mr. Lindsey if he was willing to trade off that expense for the
expense of the sidewalks, if the residents decide they would prefer sidewalks
to gravel pathways. She said a gravel pathway through the woods, in her
opinion, would wash away from runoff. She asked that the surfacing be done to
comply with the spirit of the subdivision regulation which is to provide safe
foot access for pedestrians, particularly children.
Sue Madison, 573 Rockcliff, said it was never clear at the last meeting
whether the Planning Commission had ever approved the surfacing specifications.
She also asked if the Planning Commission ever looked at the map which shows the
layout of the pathways, was it approved and is it binding?
•
•
•
Planning Commission
January 10, 1983
Page Three
Jacks said the Planning Commission approved, phase by phase, the
placement of the pathways, he said that he thinks there are some gaps in the
design and the only issue is really the surfacing. Jacks said he thought
Lindsey has the right to rely on this original pathway layout unless there is
some subsequent agreement entered into by Mr. Lindsey and the residents of the
subdivision to do something else. He said that any new agreement between the
residents and Mr. Lindsey could be looked at by the Planning Commission and
they would probably agree with it.
Stockdell pointed out that the Commission had approved a continuous system
of pathways which may be slightly different from the map they saw and she said
that was implicit in the City Board's approval.
Cullers said the Commission altered that design at one time.
Lindsey pointed out that since Phase 6 has never been completed, there are
gaps in the system.
Crisp asked again if Lindsey would be willing to take the money he would
expend putting in pathways and use it as credit towards sidewalks if the
landowners in her area were willing to put up the rest of the expense in
order to have sidewalks.
Lindsey said, if sidewalks in her area could be tied into the system and if
everyone else in her area would approve it, his answer would be yes.
Barbara Crook pointed out it could create a problem having isolated stretches
of sidewalks for those individual landowners who wish to have sidewalks, as
there needs to be a continuous system so that people can get from one end of the
subdivision to the other.
Lindsey said he thought it would be necessary to "replat" the subdivision,
with all property owners signing the "replat".and he is willing to go through
that process.
Bernard Madison, 573 Rockcliff, said he thinks what happened in Phase One
impacts the situation, because sidewalks were traded off for something else.
He said he felt the Planning Commission must protect the public interest, that
some people might not want sidewalks in front of their house, that when the
sidewalks were waived in Phase One, there was much undeveloped land abutting
Phase One; but now the sidewalks are needed. He said the paths are absolutely
unusable at night, are not lighted, and are not substitutes for sidewalks under
any circumstances, as they cannot be ridden on with bicycles, and cannot be
walked on by children on muddy, cold days. He thinks the Planning Commission
needs to consider what is going to happen in the future. He said he read in
the City's new calendar that the City was not interested in granting sidewalk
variances last year, that they had granted very few. He said he would agree to
meet with Lindsey to come up with some design that makes the pathways usable
but that, if this cannot be done, there must be the best quality surfacing
possible.
Cullers reiterated his comments about the Board's change of attitude
towards waiving sidewalks and said he thinks the Planning Commission has the
opportunity to see to it that the pathways are at least to the standards
mentioned in McCord's letter.
Stockdell asked if the phrase "asphalt or gravel" means it is up to the
Commission to decide between the two or is the City Attorney saying he is
unclear whether it is to be asphalt or gravel.
Jacks thinks the Commission approved gravel but thinks the way it is
stated, it is at the option of the developer.
3
•
•
Planning Commission
January 10, 1983
Page Four
Stockdell said in Article IV of the subdivision regulations, it is also
indicated that "the Planning Commission may grant a variance to the subdivider
. . . provided that the variation will not have the effect of nullifying the
intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations."
B. J. Dow, 571 Rockcliff, commented that she had hiked on the pathway
which had been recently graveled and it was about 4 inches deep in gravel.
She said walking on it was exhausting after about 100 yards, that you could
not ride a bike over it.
David Williams said his opinion is that the Commission can say what the
requirement is now and can attach a criteria for what is needed to meet it.
He said, according to McCord's letter, the very minimum interpretation is that
the requirement was for footpaths, varying the materials on the pathways from
asphalt to gravel. He said he did not think the intent was to provide a
bicycle path but was to replace sidewalks with some dependable, all-weather
footpath terrain that would enable safe movement back and forth as a reasonable
substitute for sidewalks. He did not think it would be acceptable to have gravel
that was washing away nor a place where gravel was used that could cause holes
or places to trip. He said he imagined paths surfaced with a combination of
gravel and asphalt.
Williams moved the Planning Commission's interpretation of
both fact and intent is (a) the agreement was for a pathway MOTION
with varied materials from asphalt to gravel and (b) the intent
is that asphalt and gravel be used in such a way as to provide
a substantial, dependable, all-weather footpath in lieu of being able to build
a sidewalk.
The motion was seconded by Windell Cullers.
Stockdell said she would vote in favor but would like the minutes to reflect
that the intent of the sidewalk requirement in the subdivision regulation should
be that a child can ride a bicycle across a sidewalk and she is not sure a
pathway is a substitute for that.
Morton Gitelman said in some cities it is illegal to ride a bicycle on a
sidewalk and questioned if this is permitted in Fayetteville.
Cullers disagreed with Stockdell,and stated he thought this instance is
a rare circumstance.
Williams stated he simply wished to set out a minimum intent, even though
he may not agree with the people who made the original decision.
Lindsey said he accepts full responsibility for the lapse of time causing
the current situation. He pointed out they cannot get hot mix asphalt to the
site and will have to use some kind of cold pack hot mix, probably in the front
of a backhoe bucket, to get to some of the locations.
Don Hunnicutt suggested concrete might be used and Lindsey agreed this
could be feasible in some cases.
The motion passed, 9-0.
Jacks brought up the fact that in 1977 there was a whole different
attitude about sidewalks and they were waived frequently, that when Lindsey
said it would be better to go through the woods with pathways than to try to
build sidewalks on the hillside, the Planning Commission agreed, that since
that time the City Board has adopted a different attitude.
Sue Madison asked if there was not already some delinquency involved on
getting the pathways built. She said she thought it was determined at the last
meeting that Mr. Lindsey did not have the required sidewalks built on Cliffside.
She asked when the work was supposed to be done.
4
Planning Commission
January 10, 1983
Page Five
Lindsey said his lots were bonded to the City under contract as security
that he complete the work. He said "the five-year rule" could be interpreted
to apply to this, although he is trying to take steps as fast as he can to
accomplish the work.
Cullers asked why the "five year rule" couldn!t apply to the pathways,as
it'does to the sidewalks.
Lindsey stated the rule would apply in Phase 3 and asked Bobbie Jones what
the effective date would be.
Jones stated the ,date should be five years from the date of final plat
approval.
Lindsey said he would report back forthwith, weather permitting, that the
work has been accomplished and asked if Clayton Powell would inspect the work,
taking the Planning Commission's interpretation as a basis for whether the
work has been done adequately.
There was general agreement from Planning Commission members that this
would be the case.
Julie Nash asked Mrs. Dow and Mrs. Madison if they had any agreement in
mind when they bought their homes that the developer was supposed to build
sidewalks. Mrs. Madison stated she thought the City was to build the
sidewalks. Nash asked if Dow and Madison had been notified of the meetings:.
One of them stated it was only when they noticed a lot of activity that they
wondered what was going on.
Bobbie Jones explained that the Planning Office had written to Jim
Lindsey and asked him when he was going to build pathways.
B. J. Dow said she had known nothing about sidewalks and Ginger Parker
Crisp stated her husband knew about pathways in lieu of sidewalks.
David Williams said, if the neighborhood comes up with any new agreements
with Lindsey, he would be in favor of upgrading the standards. He asked, if
a new agreement is reached to relocate sidewalks and pathways and have more
sidewalks, does this cancel all previous agreements?
Bobbie Jones said, back in November, Cullers raised the question that,
since the pathways had not been put in within the contract period time, could
the City now require Lindsey to put in standard concrete sidewalks along one
side of the street and around the culs de sac, even though the Planning
Commission had previously waived the standards to allow pathways. City Attorney
McCord's answer was "No - the contract prescribes the City's remedy.".
Cullers stated there might be instances where sidewalks could be
substituted for pathways and cited an example which he had brought out at the
last meeting where a pathway needed to be relocated in Phase 4 because a house
was scheduled to be built in the middle of the pathway design, and the minutes
show that Lindsey agreed to change the pathway to a sidewalk to be built to
City standards because he was given permission to move it out to the street
(In this case, the developer asked to make the change to please a potential
buyer.) Bobbie Jones said this change was made before the final plat for
Phase 4 was recorded.
Chairman Jacks said he thinks the developer and the Hyland Park residents
should try and work out some agreement.
Ginger Parker Crisp asked, if an agreement were to be worked out, would it
be necessary to come before the Planning Commission for approval.
Jacks stated this would be necessary.
5
Planning Commission
January 10, 1983
Page Six
The next item was to
consider a conditional
use request submitted by
Kim Hendren (KEZA-FM 108)
to have a radio station
studio and 300 -foot tower
at Futrall, Wedington and
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST
RADIO STATION STUDIO AND TOWER
FUTRALL, WEDINGTON AND FULBRIGHT EXPRESS
KIM HENDREN
Fulbright Express; zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial
District. Mr. Hendren and Mr. McChristian were present.
Bobbie Jones said the Planning Office did not notify any adjacent property
owners because she thought the property was surrounded almost completely by
streets. She said that a person had come into the office and asked that the
Planning Commission take into consideration the fact that the approach path for
the airport lies across this proeprty and be sure the height was cleared with
the FAA.
Jacks stated he thought that was a legal necessity that he did not think
the owners would forget to check.
In answer to a question, Mr. McChristian explained this would be a microwave
tower.
David Williams moved approval.
The motion was seconded by Melanie Stockdell.
There was a question about Futrall Drive and Bobbie Jones explained it was
formerly Cabinet Lane and before that, Giles Road, and it is part of the service
road on the City's Master Street Plan, but she said this was an area where the
State did not build a service road and she did not know what future plans the
State might have.
In answer to a question, Mr. McChristian said the area in question was
3.45 acres.
The motion passed, 9-0.
Next was a request by Bill
Mandrell (The New School) for a four-
month extension of time on paving
their parking area at 2470 North
Gregg. Mr. Mandrell was present.
Chairman Jacks explained
the Planning Commission had approved a one-year extension which ran out on
October 26, 1982 and that Mr. Mandrell has now submitted a letter explaining
the reasons for his request.
Bobbie Jones explained Mr. Mandrell is requesting a four-month extension
from today, rather than from October 26, 1982.
Windell Cullers moved approval for a one-year extension from October 26,
1982 to October 26, 1983.
The motion was seconded by Newton Hailey, Jr. and passed, 9-0.
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION
ON PAVING PARKING AREA
THE NEW SCHOOL
2470 NORTH GREGG
BILL MANDRELL
The last item onthe agenda
was a request for a variance
from the lot size requirement
applicable to a lot split submitted
by Lois Stratton for property north of
Highway 62 and east of One Mile Road.
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM
LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT
FOR LOT SPLIT
LOIS STRATTON
6
I
•
•
•
Planning Commission
January 10, 1983
Page Seven
Chairman Jacks said he had received a call from Bill Storey saying he
has an interest in this issue and just found out about it and asked that the
Planning Commission table the item
John Everett, Attorney from Prairie Grove, stated he represented an
adjacent property owner who also asks that this item be tabled.
It was noted that no one was present to represent Lois Stratton and
Windell Cullers moved to table the request.
The motion was seconded by Morton Gitelman and passed, 9-0.
Chairman Jacks stated the request would be considered again at the
January 24 meeting.
With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:00 P.M.
7
PAGE SUBJECT DATE
1 Jim Lindsey (SW g Pathway - Hyland Park Subdivision)
11"6 Kim Hendren (Radio Station Studio - Futrall, Wedington $ Fulbright)
6 Bill Mandrell (The New School - 2470 North Gregg)
6 Lois Stratton (Req..for Lot Split - Property N. of Hwy 62'$ E of One Mile)
8 University Baptist Church (Vandeventer Avenue)
8 Lois Stratton (Req. for variance on lot size requirement)
9 Gordon Wilkins (Req. to omit streetlight - East Oaks Subdivision)
10 App. of Committee to nominate officer for 1983
(Morton Gitelman, David Williams, Julie Nash)
10 Johnie & Ora V. Bassett (Rezoning Petition R82-20)
11 David McWethy (Rezoning - City of Fay. - Park Property)
12 George Faucette, Jr. (Rezoning - ARI Corporation)
12 Carol McDaniel (Child Care - 1901 Austin Drive)
12 Roy Faubus (Extension on time on paving parking - 1901 Moore lane)
13 Election of Officers nominating committee (Sec.: Ernest Jacks;
Vice Chairman: Melanie Stockdell; Chairman: Newton Hailey, Jr.)
13 Rogers Company (Rolling Meadows - Phase III)
15 Jim House (Rezoning - Huntsville Road)
16 James T. Calabria et al case ( Amendment chapter 18, sec. 18-13)
17 Sam Miller (Happy Hollow Rd. $ 5th St. - Lot Split)
18 Larry Wood (Hwy 16 West - Study of Newly Annexed area)
20 Johnie $ Ora V. Bassett (Rezoning P. R82-20 - Hwy 16 West)
20 George Faucette (Rezoning P. - ARI Corporation - Hwy 16 West)
21 Zeek Taylor (Rezoning P. - 1317 North Garland Ave.)
22 C.D., City of Fay. (L.S. Development plan - Walker Park North)
23 The Salvation Army (LSD plan - Corps Community Center)
23 Guy Seaton (Lot Split - Molly Wagnon Rd.)
11,4 Wade Bishop (W of Safety Zones - 6 Lots - Regency N. Ph. 2)
4 Mrs. Marie Terry (Amendment to Z.O..- Mobile Homes)
25 Bill Bracey (Lot Split - Davidson Shoe Bldg.)
25 Committee Reports and Review
26 Sequoyah Land Co. (Final Plat - Sequoyah S., Ph. I)
27 Douglas D. Knapp & Sandra J. Pringle (T close & vacate Alley)
27 Loren R. Heiple (Driveway Safety Zone - 1492 Century Dr.)
29 ARI Corporation (R.P. R83-1 - Hwy 16 West)
29 Jim Lindsey (Construct 40 apartment units at 2581 & 2607 Kantz Dr.)
30 Parks Ordinance
31 Hwy 16 West (Public Hearing - Amendment to the Gen. & Master St. Plans)
35 Johnie Bassett (Rez. P. R82-20 - Hwy 16 West)
36 Jim Lindsey $ William Elsass(LSD Plan - Oakshire Apts., E. Oak &Kantz Dr.)
37 Bryce Davis (Rez. Pet. - K of Hwy 71 bypass, N. of Old Farmington Rd)
37 ARI Corp..(Rez. Pet. - N. of Wedington Dr. $ E. of County Rd 877)
39 Sylvia Swartz (CUR for a Duplex - 607 N. Razorback Rd)
39 Cydney Thompson (CUR for Child Care - 890 S. Washington St.)
40 Ginger L. Hansen (CUR Home Occupation of Child Care - 3355 Martin Ave.)
40 Shelton Sales $ Service, Inc. (CUR for Heating, ect. Sales - 2717 Drake)
41 Johnie Bassett (Req. for Lot Split - Lot 2, Block 2, Carlon Ctr.)
41 Ward K. Adams (Ext. of paving - parking area & driveway - 1368 Leverett)
42 Cecil $ Georgia Drake (Abandon ROW - 8th st. between Blocks 3 & 4)
43 Loraine L. Couch (Vacate & Abandon unimproved St. ROW - 8th St.)
44 Robert Whitfield, Inc. (Oakland Townhouses - 1376 N. Oakland Ave.)
45 Leon Edens (LSD Plan, Apt. Complex - Leverett Ave. - 1300 block)
05 Bryce Davis (Rez. Pet. - W. of Hwy 71 Bypass $ N. of Old Famington Rd)
7 CAL -GAS (Lot Split - Pump Station Rd. g Armstrong Ave.)
47 Donna Caudle (CUR - Day Care - 1034 S. Washington)
01-10-83
01-10-83
01-10-83
01-10-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
01-24-83
02-14-83
02-14-83
02-14-83
02-14-83
02-14-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
02-28-83
03-14-83
03-14-83
03-14-83
03-28-83
03-28-83
03-28-83
03-28-83
03-28-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-11-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
PAGE SUBJECT DATE
48 Jeremy Hess (Driveway Setback Waiver - 11 N. Duncan Ave.)
48 Abundant Life Tabernacle (CU, Church, etc. - 1855 N. Porter Rd)
James W. Maddox (Lot Split - Abandant Life Tabernacle)
Kathryn Coatney (Waiver of Req., Access to Public St. - 1639 S.'School)
Northbriar Subdivision (Formerly Rolling Meadows, Ph. III - Subdivider's Cont.
Housing Types for Elderly or Dependent Relatives (Commi•ttee.Report)
Controlled Access Highway $ Service Road Requirements (Committee Report)
Jerry L. Wilson (CUR - Keyport Self -storage - Sycamore St. 8 Hwy 71)
Jerry L. Wilson (LSD Plan - Keyport Self -storage - Sycamore $ Hwy 71)
Zola Stanberry (Lot Split - S. of 16 East & East of Mally)
St. James Baptist Church."(Setback for Driveway $ Safety Zone - 101 S. Willow)
Al Romine (Off -Site, Off -Street parking - Bull's Eye PUB - 409 W. Dickson)
Jeremy Hess (Driveway Setback Waiver - 11 N. Duncan Ave.)'
Animal Fair (Sign Ordinance - S. School Ave.)
Barbara Crook (Alternate Housing for elderly as a temp. cond., Committee Rep.)
Ben Israel (LSD, Lot 5, College Market Addition)
Rogers Company (Final Plat - North Briar Subdivision)
A.W. Realty (Final Plat - Vantage Square)
Dr. James Maddox (LSD Plan - Abundant Life Tabernacle - 1855 N. Porter Rd)
Kaylor Investments (Rez. Pet. - S. of Joyce St., W. of Hwy 265)
Lindsey, Sexton $ J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. (Rez. R83-6, Joyce St.)
John Power (Lot Size - S. of Sycamore F, W. of N. College)
Industrial Development Corp. (Waiver of frontage on public roadway, Lot split)
Jeremy Hess (Driveway setback waiver - 11 N. Duncan Ave.)
Red Lobster Restaurant (Lot Split - 3885 N. Shiloh Drive)
Red Lobster Restaurant (LSD Plan - 3885 N. Shiloh Drive)
Chicken Country Restaurant (LSD Plan - 1889 N. College Ave.)
III7 Johnny Quinn (LSD Plan - Andrew Corp. Industrial Park Area)
8 Phillip D. Yoakum (Rez. - Drake St. and Highway 71 Bypass)
68 John Maguire (Rez..= Sycamore St. F, Hwy 71 Bypass - M.A.P. Group)
70 Garry Drake (Lot Split - Hwy 45 F, Woodsedge Rd. - Grouth Area:)
71 Danny Wright (CUR - University Baptist Church)
77 James $ Mary Rush (Rez. Petition R83-9 - Stone St.)
79 First Pentecostal Church of God (LSD Plan - 1351 Morningside Drive)
79 Huntsville Road as a Collector (Public hearing,: amendments to master st. plan)
82 University Baptist Church (Rehearing - CU - Ark. Inst. of Theology)
85 Beach $ Phillips (Rez. - Lot 1, Pond Addition - Hwy 16 West)
86 Terry Beach (Lot Split - Lot 1, Pond Addition - Hwy 16 West)
86 Terry Beach (CU for a tandem lot, Lot 1, Pond Addition - Hwy 16 West)
87 Johnie Bassett (CU - Plumbing, Heating F, AC - 618 N. College Ave.)
87 University Baptist Church (CU - Ark. Inst. of Theology)
89 Daniel McCormick (CU for a triplex - 301 W. Spring St.)
91 Lindsey, Sexton $ Reynolds (Lot Split - Paradise Valley Condos., E. Joyce St.)
92 Lindsey, Sexton $ Reynolds (LSD Plan - Paradise Valley Condos., E. Joyce St.)
92 Lindsey, Sexton $ Reynolds (CU - Golf course fairways - paradise valley )
93 Jim Hatfield (Concept Plat - Sunny Lane Addition - Old Missouri $ Old Wire Rd)
94 Linde Homecare Medical Systems (CU - Liquid Oxygen Bulk Tank - 3042 Market Ave)
95 John Eichler (Lot Split - W. of Oakland $ Zion Rd - Grouth area)
95 Bill Graue (Lot Split - CU - Tandem Lot - 2625 f, 2637 N. Old Wire Road)
96 Joe Terminella (Lot Split - Willoughby Road)
97 Howell TrumboiiLawsuit (Access from the Bypass to Howell Trumbo)
98 Leonard Linstead (Lot Split - Outside City Limits)
_99 Morton Gitelman (Controlled access ordinance study - Committee Report)
0 Newton Hailey (Study of Planning Commission Bylaws - Committee Report)
01 Fox Run, Inc. (Final Plat - Hwy 45 East - Outside city limits)
50
50
51
53
54
55
56
56
57
58
58
58
60
60
61
62
63
63
64
65
65
65
66
67
04-25-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
)04-25-83
04-25-83
04-25-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-09-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
05-23-83
06-13-83
06-13-83
06-13-83
06-13-83
06-13-83
06-13-83
06-27-83
06-27-83
06-27-83
06-27-83
07-11-83
07-11-83
07-11-83
07-11-83
07-11-83
07-11-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
07-25-83
08-08-83
08-08-83
08-08-83
08-22-83
PAGE SUBJECT DATE
101
111,02
03
106
107
110
110
113
113
114
115
115
116
116
118
119
119
119
120
120
121
121
123
123
125
126
27
30
130
132
134
136
139
140
140
141
144
145
145
147
148
150
151
152
154
157
158
160
161
161
163
164
66
66
167
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. (CU - Teleph. Equip. Bldg. - 3911 N. Front)
Dale Brown (Lot Split - Whitham avenue $ Douglas St.)
University Baptist Church (CU - Ark. Inst. of Theology - 505
Fayetteville Code of Ordinances (Proposed ordinance to amend
Fayetteville Master St. Plan (Public Hearing - Amendments)
John Maguire (LSD Plan - 4210 $ 4226 N. Frontage Rd.)
M.A.P. Group (Preliminary Plat - Point west subdivision)
Lloyd €, Joan Hays (Rez. - Mt. Comfort & Deane Solomon Rds.)
Lloyd P, Joan Hays (Lot Split - Mt. Comfort F, Deane Solomon Rd
Joe B. Morris (Lot Split - Masonic Drive $ US 71)
Altha Morrison (Lot Split - Birwin $ Old Wire Rd.)
Liz Sledge (CU - Child Care - 1203 Carter St. )
Jim Lindsey (CU - Condos. - Joyce St. & Hwy 265)
Randall Webb (Amend CU request - Plant Nursery - 845 Longview)
Burlington Northern Railroad (Rez. - 512 W. Dickson St.)
Amendment to By -Laws
Bill Graue (Waiver of driveway safety zone - 2625 Old Wire Rd
William Kim Fugitt (Driveway safety zone - 3226-28-34-36 Kings Cross)
Dewitt Smith (Driveway setback - 1148 E. Rodgers Drive)
Review of IBstrictions on Non -Conformities
Hwy 16 W. Annexed Area (Drainage and sewerage evaluation)
James Davis (Req. to change the ordinance so storage units
First Federal Savings $ Loan,¶Branch Facility (LSD - North
Kenneth Paul Williams (Rez. - 1634 N. Gregg)
John M. Walker (Rez. - 1657 Sunrise Mountain Rd.)
John M. Walker (Lot Split - 1657 Sunrise Mountain Rd.)
Hwy 16 West (Sewerage $ Drainage study - report from Eng: '$ Planning
Wagner, Zinn P, Jackman (Alley vacation - Dowell Addition)
James D. Davis (Req. to amend ordinance - Mini -storage in C-3)
John M. Walker (Lot Split - 1657 Sunrise Mountain Rd. )
Don Carlon Bassett (Rez. - Rebecca F, Washington)
Gordon Houston (Rez. - Deane St. $ Porter Rd.)
Eddie Sutton (CU- St. John's Lutheran Church - Hwy 265, N. of Hwy 45)
Johnnie Wright (Lot Split - 460 Skelton St.)
J.B. Hays (Amendment to preliminary plat - Cambridge Place)
Highway 16 West (Public hearing - Sewerage P, Drainage study)
Review of Zoning Non -Conformities (Recomv from Board of Adjustment)
Lawrence Mong (LSD - Mong Dynasty Restaurant - N. College Ave.)
Paul Marinoni, Sr. (Rez. - Hwy 16 West)
William C. Sherwood $ Lee Ward (Rez. - 701 N. College Ave.)
Jim T. Hatfield (Rez. - Old Wire Rd. and Old Missouri Rd.)
Proposed Ordinance to Amend Article VII, Sec MIR Fay. Code of Ordi
Proposed Ordinance to Amend Chapter 13B Fay. .Code of Ordinances
Hwy 16 West (Sewerage and Drainage Studies)
Property Owners, South Gregg Ave. Between Ctr. St. F, Prairie
Fayetteville Municipal Airport (LSD - Drake Field)
Wade Bishop (Rez. - Stubblefield Rd. F, East of Summerhill)
Roy Cate (CU - Corner of Sycamore and Porter Road)
Paul Marinoni, Jr. (CU - S. of Wedington $ W. of Lonnie)
Huntingdon Subdivision (Req. for Waiver of Setback requirement)
Don Ward (Waiver of driveway width and safety zone - 2423 Golden Oaks Dr.)
Proposed Amendments to the Bylaws
Proposed Amendments to the Planning Commission Bylaws
B.W. Graue (Rez. - 4041 Wedington Drive)
Laverne Cooper (Rez. - 1693 Morningside Drive)
W. Maple St.)
ch. 18, Sec.18-13)
s.)
be allowed in C-3 Z)
College Ave.)
Consult.)
nances
(Req. for Downzon)
08-22-83
08-22-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-12-83
09-26-83
09-26-83
09-26-83
09-26-83
09-26-83
09-26-83
09=26-83
09-26-83
10-10-83
10-10-83
10-10-83
10-10-83
10-10-83
10-10-83
10-10-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
10-24-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-14-83
11-28-83
11-28-83
11-28-83
11-28-83
11-28-83
11-28-83
11-28-83
12-12-83
12-12-83
12-12-83
PAGE SUBJECT DATE
•
•
168
169
169
169
170
Ozark Forest Products (LSD - 833 Beechwood Ave.)
Phillip J. Joyce S. Warford (Lot Split - 5277 East Huntsville)
Commission --Amendment to the Parks Plan (Req. from the City Board of Dir.)
1984 Meeting Dates
Mr. Whitfield (Waiver of the Driveway Safety Zone at 1502 E. Stewart St.)
12-12-83
12-12-83
12-12-83
12-12-83
12-12-83
•
P1AMNfNC eatooSslon/
/9,3
Hunni- Stock-
B.Crook Cullers Gitelman Hailey cut Jacks Nash dell Williams
January 10
✓
✓
✓ [ i/
✓
✓
v
'e.'"--
._ ✓ 1 _ `�
X I ✓
.e. -----I
v I X
January 24
✓
✓
✓
February T44.---..-✓
v
v
X
c/
4----
February 28
'/
X
✓
✓
✓
March 14-
✓X
t/
,/
/
v
J
X
March 28
v
x
X
1
� ✓
April 11
`
v
✓
v
d ✓ X
April 25
1,/✓
/� V�
X
v
I
I X
May 9
V✓
V/
4.,/'
4-----
4,''-' v /moi !✓ i ✓
•May 23
✓
t/
!/
(✓ IV: X X
I X
June 13
✓
:( _
‘/
e----;
ii
c--'
X
June 27
X
V
✓
✓
✓ X
x 1 /<
1
July 11
✓
✓
x
/ ✓
4-----""
-\...- 1�
July 25
✓
/..--✓
X✓
✓ v 1 4.....---
4...H 10,11(
August 8
✓
P
�
X X
L ---------
August 22
August
V
\�
✓
i! ---G
1..-"*.-'e-�
September 12
t7
)(
XV
✓ ✓
✓
i••<
�'
September 26
✓
V/
✓ 17
X
;>4(
`
I/
October 10
///
e/ I/
C_
October 24
V
v/ /�1
i---- 4.----2(.., C✓
1
B. Crook Cullers Gitelman
Hailey cut Jacks
Nash
dell
Williams
/ ///x// a3
✓
1
✓
./
//. o-�/sr�
•
L
7
X
v/
•
1