HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-02-08 Minutes•
•
•
MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A meeting of the Planning Commission was held at 5:05 P.M'.i, Monday, February
8, 1982, in the Director's Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville,
Arkansas
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Ernest Jacks, Morton Gitelman, Barbara Crook,
Don Hunnicutt, David Williams, Melanie Stockdell, Windell
Cullers, Newton Hailey.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Martin Redfern.
Duane Nelson, Tom Hopper, Robert Melton, Rev. Arnold J.
Baughman, Bobbie Jones, Cynthia Stewart, and members of the
press and audience.
Ernest Jacks asked Newton Hailey APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS
to give the Committee's slate of
officers for the Planning Commission.
Newton Hailey stated the Committee proposes that Windell Cullers serve as
Secretary, Don Hunnicutt as Vice Chairman and Ernest Jacks as Chairman, and so
moved.
Morton Gitelman arrived.
David Williams seconded. The motion passed (7-0-1) with Morton Gitelman
abstaining.
The minutes of the January 25, 1982 meeting
of the Planning Commission were approved as
mailed.
The next item of business
was the public hearing on Rezoning
Petition R82-2, Duane Nelson to
rezone property located West of Highway
71 North, North of Highway 71 By-pass, and
East of Gregg Avenue from A-1, Agricultural District to R-2, Medium Density
Residential District.
Duane Nelson and Tom Hopper were present to represent.
The Chairman asked for the Planning Consultant to give his report.
Larry Wood stated he is recommending the requested R-2 zoning for the following
reasons:
MINUTES
REZONING PETITION R82-2
DUANE NELSON
'.'WEST OF"THE. MALL
1. The public facilities and services are available to serve the nature of the
development allowed within the district requested.
2. The R-2 district will serve to establish a use transition from Commercial
to the East to lower density residential to the West.
/2
Planning Commission Meeting
February 8, 1982
•
Page 2
3. R-2 District will add support to the established R-0 District zoning
transition to the North, on the West side of the shopping center.
4. Medium density residential is suggested as the transitional use in the
General Plan.
Jacks asked for a clarification of the major streets in the area. Larry
Wood pointed out the proposed minor arterial street which would be an extension
of Stearns Road West, and the collector street which is proposed to take off
from the by-pass service road and head North to intersect with Stearns and
eventually connect with the Main street in Johnson.
Bobbie Jones stated this was an amendment to the Master Street Plan by
ordinance 2514 in April of 1979.
Melanie Stockdell asked if these two proposed streets would intersect in this
property. Larry Wood stated the East/West minor arterial street is proposed
for the South part of this property because of the way the property aligns with
Stearns Road.
Windell Cullers asked how the Board of Directors action to change Stearns
to 67 ft. will affect this property.
Tom Hopper, with Grafton, Tull and Associates, addressed the Commission, he
stated that Stearns Road in connection with this property is proposed as an
80 ft. right-of-way. The North/South collector, in connection with this property
is:iproposed to be a 60 ft. right-of-way, located on the West side of this property
Morton Gitelman asked if the developer would dedicate 40 ft. of right-of-way
for Stearns. Hopper stated the East/West street will require 80 ft. of right-
of-way and the Developer will dedicate 40 ft. The North/South street requires
60 ft. of right-of-way and the developer will dedicate 30 ft. of that.
Gitelman stated the development plans should show this.
Jacks asked if there was anyone else present in favor of the request. There
was no response.
The Chairman asked for comments in opposition to the request. There was
no opposition.
Morton Gitelman asked Larry Wood what would happen to the R-1 property
North of the property under petition should the Planning Commission and the Board
of Directors agree to rezone this property as requested. It is R-1 district now
and it abuts R-0 District. There is R-1 and R-0 zoning directly North of the
property under application.
Larry Wood stated that the R-1 property is presently under mall ownership
and he felt the present zoning is questionable. He felt it would probably be
requested to be rezoned.
David Williams moved that Rezoning Petition R82-2 be recommended to the
Board of Directors for approval.as requested.
Don Hunnicutt seconded.
The motion passed (8-0).
The next item of business
was a request by Ross M. Fefercorn,
Omni -Shelter, Inc., to use
bituminous curbing within the Bronze Tree
Development in lieu of concrete curb and gutter.
BRONZE TREE VILLAGE
REQUEST FOR BITUMINOUS CURBING
OMNI SHELTER, INC.
13
•
•
•
Planning Commission Meeting
February 8, 1982
Page,, 3
Robert Melton was present to represent.
Jacks stated there appears to be a difference of opinion concerning the
asphalt curb and gutter. Bobbie Jones stated that Clayton Powell does not
want to recommend anything one way or another, but that he is against private
streets because he thinks the City will end up maintaining them.
Robert Melton stated that he is representing Omni -Shelter, Inc., he said
that actually he did not feel this particular area was a private street, but
a driveway approach serving the townhouses.
David Williams asked for a clarification of the request. Bobbie Jones
read the ordinance concerning the construction of curbs and gutters in a PUD.
Jacks stated that actually, the developer could install ditches to carry water
run-off. Jacks felt the asphalt curbing proposed was better than ditching but
not as substantial as concrete curbing.
Crook asked if the street cross section will remain the same, whether it
was curbed or not. Bobbie Jones stated the specifications for construction
of streets regarding sub -base, base and pavement are the same whether the
curbing is asphalt or concrete. The only thing waived is the width and the
provision for ditches.
Jacks asked if this PUD was approved with bar ditches. Bobbie Jones stated
approval was based on drainage meeting with the approval of the street superintendent.
She said the developer does not want to go to ditching.
Gitelman asked if the PUD was approved with private streets. Jacks stated
that is correct. Morton Gitelman stated there will be covenants for the
provision of street maintenance, and did not feel the City would ever be responsible
for maintaining the streets.
Windell Cullers moved that the Developer's request for asphalt curbing be
approved. Morton Gitelman seconded. The motion passed (8.t0).
The next item of business was NORTHEAST UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD
a request by Reverand Arnold J. Baughman for CONSIDERATION OF EXPANSION
the Planning Commission to consider 605 APPLEBY ROAD
any applicable restrictions that may be placed
on the Church if they purchase the property
at its present location. The Church is
located at 605 Appleby Road. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential
District.
Reverand Arnold J. Baughman was present to represent. He stated that the .
Church has been renting the property at 605 Appleby Road since the Planning
Commission gave a Conditional Use for a Church use at this location last July.
He stated lately, the owner of the property has offered to sell the lot to the
Church. Mr. Baughman stated he was concerned about any restrictions that may
be placed on the Church due to its residential zoning regarding expansion or
the construction of a new sanctuary, if the Church chooses to purchase the
property.
Jacks stated the approval for the Conditional Use did not contain a time
limit. He stated any expansion or future development may require improvements
to Appleby Road such as sidewalks, etc. Also, any future addition or extension
would have to meet the zoning setbacks.for the district.
Morton Gitelman stated a change of ownership of the lot would not affect
the approval for a church use at this location.
IL/
Planning Commission Meeting
February 8, 1982
Page 4
There being no action required on this item, the Planning Commission
considered other business.
Under other business, there OTHER BUSINESS
was an informational item,concerning a consent
decree in the case of the City vs. Riley Skillern.
Skillern is enjoined from selling additional parcels of less than five acres
from the original tract without first complying with the Subdivision Regulations,
unless a contract is entered into with the buyer that the buyer will comply with
subdivision regulations or obtain a lot split.
Bobbie Jones stated that the City Attorney has drafted an ordinance to amend
the Subdivision regulations which has been set for public hearing at the February
22, 1982 Planning Commission meeting whereby large parcels of land may be sold
without subdividing the property.
At its last meeting, the Planning Commission ZION ROAD/ZION PLACE
requested the Planning Administrator to
research the history of Zion Road and, if the
designation for Zion Road and Zion Place had not been changed, to advertise
a Public Hearing for amendment to the Master Street Plan. Bobbie Jones stated
that upon research of the matter she had discovered that the Master Street Plan
had been amended in December of 1975 to designate Zion Place as a Minor street
and Zion Road as a Collector Street.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:30 P.M.