HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-08-15 Minutes•
•
•
MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was
August 15, 1977, in the Board of Directors Room, City
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Chairman
held at 5:00 P. M., Monday,
Administration Building,
Chairman John Power, Vice -Chairman Ernest Jacks, Jack Ray, Bill
Kisor, Rita Davis (arrived 5:10), Donald Nickell, Keith Newhouse.
Peg Anderson, John Maguire.
Bobbie Jones, Angie Medlock, David McWethy, Carter Schell,
Scott Van Laningham, J. C. Rucker, Danny Thomas, Frank Blew,
Jim Lindsey, Loris Stanton, Ken Jones, J. E. McClelland,
Ervan Wimberly, Helen Edmiston, Claude Prewitt, Ann Sugg, Bill
Lazenby, Grover Thomas, Mrs. John Lineberger, John Webb, Bud Mills,
Bob Blackston, Dr. Glenn Fincher, Bryce Davis, Don Peak, Roy Bruce
Baker, Edna Baker, Tina Shepard, Mrs. Wayne Coffin.
John Power called the meeting to order.
The minutes of the July 25, 1977 Planning Commission were MINUTES
approved as mailed.
The second item for discussion was the
approval of the Final Plat of Rolling Meadows, Final Plat
Phase II, located north of Rolling Hills Drive
and between Sheryl Avenue and Old Missouri Road; Realty Development Company, Inc.,
developers.
J. C. Rucker, Mickle-Wagner $ Associates, was present to represent.
Bill Kisor said the Subdivision Committee had looked at this. He said there was a
question about whether to require sidewalks on Loxley between the subdivision and
Harold Street. He said personally he didn't feel they need to extend the sidewalk.
He noted that the street light spacing on .Cortland Street needs to be waived to
350 feet in one instance and 310 feet in another instance. He said they would
need to provide the City with a contract, designate the "Zone A" flood plain area
on the drainage easement along the east end of the subdivision and noted that the
easement along the north is not drawn to::scale. He said two boundary measurements
do not correspond to the legal description. He said two measurements wre not
drawn to scale.
Bill Kisor said Ozarks Electric is asking for an overhang utility easement on Lot 95
to serve Lot 96 and one on Lot 72 to serve Lot 71.
Ernest Jacks made a motion to waive the sidewalks on the section of Loxley outside
the subdivision and waive the street light spacing in two instances on Cortland
Street. Bill Kisor seconded the motion, which was approved unanimously.
Bill Kisor made a motion to approve the final plat of Rolling Meadows, Phase II
with the following contingencies:
1) the developer provide the City with a contract; 2) designate as "Zone A" flood
plain area on the drainage easement along the east end of the subdivision; 3) the
easement along the north side be drawn to scale; 4) correct the two boundary
measurements which do not correspond to the legal description and correct the
two measurements which are not drawn to scale; 5) provide the overhang utility
easement on Lots 95 and 96 and Lots 71 and 72.
Donald Nickell seconded the motion.
Bobbie Jones said the Board of Adjustment did waive the minimum lot width for
Lots 80, 81, and 82 on the cul-de-sac but attached a condition that the setback
line be 40 feet so they would have adequate lot width at the setback line.
The motion to approve the final plat passed unanimously.
ROLLING MEADOWS, Phase II
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977 -2-
Next was the approval of the Informal WHITE RIVER HOMESTEAD ESTATES
Plat of White River Estates located on Informal Plat
the east side of Harvey Owl Road north of
Highway 16 East; Danny B. and Evelyn Mae Thomas, developers.
Bill Kisor said they would not be able to set two monuments on the west side of
Tract 6 because they would be across the road; and also the Planning Commission
needs to waive the scale to permit a scale of 1" = 300'.
Keith Newhouse made a motion to approve the informal plat of White River Homestead
Estates with 1) waive the scale to permit 1" = 300' and 2) the two monuments on
the west of Tract 6 not be set.
Jack Ray seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
Next was the approval of the final plat of COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES
Lots 26 through 38 of Country Club Estates Lots 26 through 38
located northeast of Fayetteville Country Club; The Final Plat
Stanton Company, Inc., developers.
Grover Thomas was present to represent.
Bill Kisor made a motion to approve the final plat of Country Club Estates with
1) a private drive to serve Lots 28 and 29 --the cul-de-sac right-of-way will be
retained but there will not be a cul-de-sac constructed; 2) waive the street light
spacing in one instance to 390 feet on East Ridge Road; 3) correct the dimension on
all lots; 4) indicate iron pins set at points of intersection with the curves; and
5) Country Club Drive will only be constructed to the point of radius on Lot 33
(it will not be constructed all along the south side of Lot 33).
Keith Newhouse seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
The fifth item for discussion was the approval of the
final plat of Bassett Place located east of Highway 71
North and north of Stearns Road; Johnie and Ora Bassett
and Ottis and Winifred Harris, developers.
Bill Kisor made a motion to approve the final plat of Bassett Place with 1) the
temporary turn -around at the north end of Frontage Road be changed to show an
additional 30 feet east and west which would make the turn around 110 feet instead
of 50 feet and SO feet north/south; add a note that all but 50 feet of this
east/west dimension would revert back to the property owners when the street is
extended; 2) need a letter to Wally Brt to allow the sanitation trucks to go onto
private property to Lots 5A, 6A, and 7A; 3) lable the 25 -foot on the east side of
Frontage Road as utility easement; 4) the Planning Commission waive the distance
on the jog between Frontage Road and the bypass access road; 5) furnish a contract
or bond to the City; 6) show the scale and date; and 7) add a note prohibiting driveway
access to Highway 71 and Stearns Road.
Jack Ray seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
BASSETT PLACE
Final Plat
wy 71 $ Stearns Rd.
The sixth item for consideration was the approval of SUNSET WOODS
the preliminary plat of Sunset Woods, a Planned Unit Planned Unit Development
Development located west of Sunset Avenue and south Preliminary Plat
of North Street; Sugg -Bowen Enterprises, Inc., developers.
Ervan Wimberly and others were present to represent.
Ervan Wimberly said they are not asking for approval of the preliminary plat now.
They asked to table the preliminary plat until the next meeting.
Ervan Wimberly said this was originally planned as a Planned Unit Development with
private streets. He said there was now a question as to whether they could build
a house on a private street. He said if they cannot, they would like the Planning
Commission to waive the width of the public street to permit a 20 or 24 foot wide
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977
pavement instead of the 31 feet pavement required in the Subdivision Regulations.
He said the street right-of-way .will need to be narrow or the setback reduced
because they have a problem with the terrain. The street will be constructed to
City standards with curb and gutter, etc.
Chairman Power asked that City Attorney McCord check, before the next meeting, to
see if they can build on private streets.
Ervan Wimberly said they would like to provide a through street on Oak -Lewis for
fire protection, police, etc. He said the people in the neighborhood don1t want
them to connect Cedarwood and Eva. He noted that they could build two culs-de-sac
there back to back but they would only have 50 feet frontage on Lots 3 and 5.
Chairman Power acknowledged the following letter from William Bonner:
MEMORANDUM
Fayetteville City Planning Commission
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Subject: Proposed Plat for Sunset Woods
A Planned Unit Development
A Planned Unt.t Development must meet the requirements of Article 8,
Section 12 of the city's zoning regulations as well as the requirements of
the subdivision regulations. It is our opinion that the requirements for
a planned unit development must be satisfied prior to the filing of an application
for preliminary plat approval. Article 8, Section 12, Paragraph (F) of
the Zoning Regulations states, in part, the following:
Before any zoning permit or building permit is issued for land
or a building or a planned development, the developer shall obtain
approval by the Planning Commission of an over-all plan for develop-
ing the land. For this purpose he shall submit to the Planning
Commission a plan prepared by a recognized land planner or a registered
architect which:
Shall define the location of the areas to be devoted to specific
uses;
Shall
Shall
Shall
Shall
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
state the
set forth
include a
include a
open recreation
other public or
If the plan is approved by the Planning Commission, the developer
shall thereafter submit a detailed plan, containing all the information
required for any part or section of the land for which he expects to
seek subdivision approval in the immediate future.
acreages to be devoted to specific uses;
the proposed density of dwelling units;
street plan and a public utility plan; and
separate plan showing the location of parks,
areas and other open spaces, schools and
community uses.
We have no evidence that the procedure and the requirements set forth
•
above have been complied with by the developer.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977
-4-
It is our understanding that the developer intends that Fowler and
Cedarwood Avenues would be the only public streets within the proposed
subdivision. We do not find in the zoning regulations any reference to
private streets or to streets being considered a portion of the community
open space. In fact we find that Article 8. Section 7 states that every
building "shall be on a lot adjacent to a public street."
We see a legal question for the city. Do the city's subdivision regula-
tions and standards apply only to publicly dedicated streets in a subdivision
or do they also apply to private streets? We believe the city's regulations
apply to all streets, whether public or private. If required standards
are not applied to private streets, developers could utilize the device
of private streets as a means to undertake street developments that do not
meet citystandards. This would be subverting the intent of subdivision
• regulations which is to establish minimum standards of development.
We do not find any indication in the regulations for a Planned Unit
Development that the city intended the developer to be exempt from any
requirements pertaining to improvements.
The procedure and requirements for a Planned Unit Development cited
previously must be adhered to and the detailed plan for the development,
including not only the physical aspects but also the maintenance of the
common open spaces, must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to any
approval of the preliminary plat as required in the subdivision regulations.
From the information available to us, the developer has failed to provide
certain specific information required by the subdivision regulations. These
include: five foot contour intervals, a general drainage plan, information
on location and size of proposed utility lines and protective covenant.
We believe that the nature of the terrain is such that adequate planning
can not be achieved without five foot contour intervals. If a Planned Unit
Development concept is to be followed, the plan should indicate sittings of
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977
all buildings as well :s
to the prohlem of storm
the subdivision as well
plans for the
water drainage
as from without
Lommon areas. Ive also call attention
- both from water originating within
Based on the topographic information provided, the plan appears to be
feasible. Lewis Lane may have a grade in excess of 7% on the south portion,
which is acceptible for a local street. However, the street may carry
considerable storm water southward which will need to be properly handled
so as not to adversely affect the adjacent property on the south side of the
proposed subdivision.
The only design feature of the proposed subdivision to which we object
strenuously is the connection of Cedarwood and Eva Avenues. We believe it
is more feasible and desireable that lots 4 and 6 be served from an extention
of the present cul de sac on Cedarwood and that lots 3 and 5 be served from
an extended cul de sac of Eva.
We also call attention to the situation that currently exists on Cedarwood
Avenue. The street and its drainage appear to be misaligned to the west.
This situation would need to be corrected prior to any development which
requires access and drainage improvements within the subdivision.
714 4/ C <..,
8/14/77
•
•
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977 -6-
Chairman Power also acknowledged a petition with all except one residential
owner in the neighborhood's signature.
Ernest Jacks asked why they object to tying Eva and Cedarwood as through streets.
Mr. Bonner said they don't want the traffic and traffic problems.
William Bonner said the Commission has to recognize that it is the intent of the
subdivision regulations to establish requirements for subdivisions in the City.
He said the waiving of those requirements because it is a public or private street
is a subvention of having the regulations.
Mrs. John Lineberger, Cedarwood, said the problems she is concerned about are
traffic control and drainage.
John Webb, 800 Cedarwood was also concerned about drainage. He was afraid it would
provide a natural drainage channel onto his property.
Rita Davis said she doesn't feel a 20 -foot wide street would be wide enough.
Ervan Wimberly said they may go to a 24 -foot wide street. He said if they have a
30 -foot street in a 50 foot right-of-way and a 25 -foot building setback they
couldn't use the land because of the shelf which is only 100-150 feet wide.
Ernest Jacks made a motion to table this preliminary plat until August 29 with
City Attorney Jim McCord to review the Planned Unit Development regulations and
advise if a Planned Unit Development may have private streets. At that time the
Planning Commission is to rule on whether, to waive street width if it is to be a
public street and whether to delete the street connection between Cedarwood and
Eva Avenues.
Donald Nickell seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
The next item for discussion was the public REZONING PETITION R77-22
hearing on Rezoning Petition No. 77-22, Ken Ken Lazenby
Lazenby to rezone property located south of Old Missouri Road
Zion Road and west of Old Missouri Road from
R-1, Low Density Residential District to R-2, Medium Density Residential District.
This item was tabled at the July 11, 1977 meeting.
Bill Lazenby and Attorney Bud Mills were present to represent.
Chairman Power said he would have to abstain from voting because he owns property
in the area.
Chairman Power noted the recommendation by Planning Consultant Larry Wood which
said
The requested R-2 District is not recommended at this time.
The northeast part of Fayetteville is experiencing a great deal
of development pressure and much of the development is taking
place without full utility services. Sewer facilities are about
4000 feet south of this property and could not economically be
extended for this development. Each development that goes on
septic tank puts the possibility of sewer extension just that
much further away. Until a full range of facilities can be
provided more intensive development is not recommended.
Note: The R-2 District zoning that surrounds this property on
the north, west, and south was done in 1971, and the
recommendation was made on the basis that a planned unit
development would be processed including sewer extension.
The request now before the Commission would not require
a large scale development plan.
Bud Mills said this is a very small tract of land. The property to the north
is R-2 and is already developed. The property to the west and north can be
developed with multi -family units at any time He said it is not economically
•
•
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977 -7-
feasible to develop this with single-family because they only have half an acre
of land and could not get the market value for a single-family home in the middle
of multi -family. He said they are not asking for "spot zoning" --they are asking
for a spot to be rezoned to be consistent with the area. He said the owner would
probably develop this as single-family if he could not do otherwise; but'itwould
not be economically feasible. He said he would probably be willing to have this
rezoned with the condition that he will not develop multi -family until sewer
becomes available
Bobbie Jones noted that they could not attach a condition to a rezoning but the
property owner could willingly submit a Bill of Assurances stating that he would
not develop with multi -family until sewer is available and it would be binding
with the land.
No one was present in opposition.
Jack Ray acknowledged a letter in opposition from Liallies Hasler who owns the
adjoining A-1 parcel. She said she is "very much against any type of rezoning".
Keith Newhouse made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning with a
Bill of Assurances being provided to the City, saying that they will connect
onto sewer when it becomes available and that there will be no development other
than R-1 development without sewer.
Donald Nickell seconded the motion, which passed 6-0-1, with Ray, Kisor, Davis,
Jacks, Nickell and Newhouse voting "Aye" and Power abstaining.
The eighth item for discussion was the public hearing
on Rezoning Petition No. R77-28, Enoch Bailey to
rezone property located east of Old Missouri Road
REZONING PETITION R77-28
Enoch Bailey
Joyce Street
and north of Joyce Street from A-1, Agricultural
District to R-1, Low Density Residential District.
Bob Blackston, Homestead Realty, was present to represent.
He said they need to get the property rezoned so the owner can build a residence
on each of the two lots without having the 200 feet frontage for each required
in the A-1 district.
Chairman Power acknowledged Larry Wood's planning report which says he is not in
favor of granting this rezoning because
1. The area lacks sufficient water and sewer facilities
to support an urban density potential,
2. Approval of the application will establish more precedent
for development without sewer facilities, development with
insufficient water to fight fires and move the day these
facilities will be provided further away.
Donald Nickell questioned how the purchaser of the property
Bob Blackston said there would be approximately 6 acres per
Dr. Glen Fincher, 2100 Green Acres Road, said he would plan
one 6 -acre lot and would hope someone would buy the other 6
home but he couldn't assure the Commission of that.
Bobbie Jones said she had suggested they go the tandem lot route. She said a
tandem lot is not limited by zoning district. The lot behind the tandem lot
would only have 70 feet frontage so he needs to get it rezoned to R-1, Low Density
Residential District. If the property remains A-1, they would need 200 feet
frontage for the back lot.
Bill Kisor questioned if they could tie on to City water and Mr. Fincher said
he had checked with the water department and they said he could.
plans to develop it.
lot.
to build a home on
acres and build one
•
•
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977 -8-
Chairman Power asked if they would be willing to submit a Bill of Assurances that
they would tie on to sewer when it became available and Mrs. Fincher questioned if
the 6 acres would not be adequate for a septic tank.
Donald Nickell made a motion to grant the rezoning.
Ernest Jacksseconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
Next for discussion was the conditional use request for a
tandem lot submitted by Enoch Bailey for property
located East of Old Missouri Road and north of
Joyce Street.
Chairman Power questioned if they could approve the tandem lot on the A-1 property.
Bobbie Jones said the owner could develop the tandem lot in A-1, but could not
develop the back portion of the property without rezoning to R-1, because he wouldn't
have adequate frontage.
Ernest Jacks made a motion to approve the tandem lot request for Enoch Bailey.
Donald Nickell seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
ENOCH BAILEY
Tandem Lot
Joyce Street
The next item for consideration was the public
hearing on Rezoning Petition No. R77-29, James E.
Lindsey to rezone property located north of
Poplar Street and between Birch and Chestnut Avenues
from R-2, Medium Density Residential District to I-1, Heavy Commercial and Light
Industrial District.
Jim Lindsey was present to represent.
Mr. Lindsey said that Skull Creek is the dividing point --all the land on the east side
of the creek is designated as industrial and the property to the west of the creek is
designated as R-2. He said he is trying to get the property in line with the Land Use
Plan. .;
Chairman Power asked why he was going from R-2 to I-1 without some other considerations
and Jim Lindsey said he was going with what Planning Consultant Larry Wood felt it
should be.
No one was present in opposition.
Keith Newhouse made a motion to approve Rezoning Petition No. R77-29.
Jack Ray seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
REZONING PETITION R77-29
James E. Lindsey
Poplar Street
The next item for discussion was the public
hearing on Rezoning Petition No. R77-30, Bryce J.
Davis for Frank Lynch and Frank Krupa to rezone
property located west of Highway 71 Bypass and North of
Highway 62 West from A-1, Agricultural District to R-2,
Bryce J. Davis was present to represent.
Bryce Davis presented drawings of the proposed bypass access road, which will go from
Old Farmington Road to Highway 62 West. He felt all of the land along the bypass
needs R-2 or some kind of buffer from the residential. He said if the Planning Commission
doesn't rezone all of the property, he would like them to consider rezoning the east
600-700 feet. Some of the property owners in the area were concerned about the road
and Bryce Davis assured them that when the plan is developed, they will have to have
proper access to the development.
Bill Kisor asked what they are planning to use the property for and Bryce Davis said
they are proposing a mobile home park.
Don Peak, Old Farmington Road, owns property adjacent to this. He was concerned about
the road and also about the drainage flowing to the east.
Roy Bruce Baker, 2975 Old Farmington Road, said he feels the property should stay
zoned A-1. He stated that there are no roads or sewer to the property and said he
feels there should be some "green land" around the perimeter of Fayetteville.
REZONING PETITION R77-30
Bryce J. Davis
Hwy. 71 Bypass $ Hwy 62 W
Medium Density Residential District.
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977 -9-
Bryce Davis pointed out that if they leave the property as A-1, they could run
livestock on it. He said the developer knows if he develops it, he will have
to put an adequate road in. Bobbie Jones said that no development at all can
be built on the bypass without the approval of the Planning Commission.
Ernest Jacks said he would like to see an overall plan of how they would like
to rezone and show a buffer zone.
Edna Baker, 2975 Old Farmington Road, reminded the Planning Commission that this
area has still retained a rural character. She said they are talking about a
large number of people on an odd -shaped piece of land among about 70 people
in the neighborhood now. She felt the Planning Commission should consider the
impact on the neighborhood.
Ernest Jacks made a motion to table this matter so that the developer can submit
an overall plan. Keith Newhouse seconded the motion.
Chairman Power said he would like to see an alternative rezoning showing buffering.
Bill Kisor said he is not sure he will be in favor of any rezoning without
adequate streets into the area. Rita Davis and Donald Nickell agreed.
Penny Shepard, corner of One Mile Road and Old Farmington Road, said she would
not be opposed to the development but said she has a big problem with the dust
from the roads.
The vote was unanimous to table the petition. Bobbie Jones advised Mr. Davis
this must be acted upon within 45 days.
The eleventh item for discussion was the
public hearing on Rezoning Petition
No. R77-31, Mathias Real Estate
Partnership (John A., James I., Berniece J.,
and Sam H Mathias) to rezone property located west of Easy Avenue and north of
Poplar Street from R-1, Low Density Residential District to R-2, Medium Density
Residential District.
Chairman Power noted the following recommendation by Planning Consultant Larry Wood:
The adopted General Plan recommends medium density residential,
however, several years ago the Commission reviewed a recommen-
dation and concurred that the area west of the railroad tracks,
east of Skull Creek, north of North Street and south of Town-
ship Road would provide a convenient and close -in light indus-
trial area. Since then the Commission has recommended rezoning to
I-1 District on several tracts and substantial development has
followed. This request for R-2 District is not compatible with
the developing light industrial character of this area and is
therefore not recommended for approval. Residential development
should be convenient to industrial areas but not mixed in with
them.
REZONING PETITION R77-31
Mathias Real Estate Partnership
Easy Avenue
Chairman Power felt they should table this until someonecould be present to
represent.
Donald Nickell said he had gone down and looked at the property and he felt
R-2 would be the right zoning for the area.
Ernest Jacks said he would like to talk to Planning Consultant Larry Wood on his
recommendation.
Bill Kisor made a motion to table this until the meeting on August 22, 1977.
Ernest Jacks seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
•
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 1977 -10-
Next was a conditionaluse request for a mobile home
park submitted by Bryce J. Davis for property located West
of Highway 71 Bypass and north of Highway 62 West. The
MOBILE HOME PARK
Conditional Use
Bryce J. Davis
property is being rezoned under Petition No. R77-30.
If the request for the mobile home park is approved, it should be conditioned upon
receiving rezoning from the Planning Commission and the Board of Directors.
This item was tabled on a motion by Mr. Jacks, seconded by Mr. Ray, until the
developer brings back a preliminary plan showing the zoning.
The next item for discussion was the DUPLEX CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST
conditional use request for a duplex Mrs. Wayne Coffin
submitted by Mrs. Wayne Coffin for Cato Springs Road
property located North of Cato Springs
Road and east of Garland Avenue, property zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District.
Mrs. Wayne Coffin was present to represent.
Mrs. Coffin said she wants to add on to her existing house to build an apartment
for her mother.
Claude Prewitt said he felt this would enhance the area. He said it will be a
very appearling house and will look nice. He said he has a duplex conditional
use across the street from this property. There was no one present in opposition.
Bill Kisor made a motion to approve the conditional use.
Ernest Jacks seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
Next was the proposal to amend the AMENDMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Commission's By-laws to BY-LAWS
require five (5) affirmative votes
to grant a conditional use request.
Ernest Jacks made a motion to add this to the Planning Commission by-laws. Keith
Newhouse seconded the motion, which passed unanimously.
The last item was the appointment of a committee APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTEE
to study and make a recommendation on
a) green space in subdivisions, and
b) creation of an "offices" only zone.
Chairman Power asked that this be put back on the agenda for August 22, 1977.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:10 P. M.
•
•
•
RESOLUTION PC 42-77
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Monday, August 15, 1977, the Planning
Commission voted to approve the final subdivision plat dated
19 , known as Rolling Meadows, Phase II, submitted by Realty Development
Co.; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that because the necessary
improvements have not been installed in said subdivision that Ernest R.
Coleman enter into and furnish the City with the necessary subdivision contract
before the Board of Directors accepts this final subdivision plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. The necessary subdivision contract be executed with the
City prior to the Board of Directors accepting the final subdivision plat.
SECTION 2. That the City Planning Commission of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
hereby approves the final plat along with the land dedicated for streets and
other public uses in the Fox Hunter's Estates Subdivision described as
follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36,
T -17-N, R -30-W, Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being a _
part of Blocks 3, 4, and 7 of Stubblefield Addition, and being
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing on the West line 81.5 feet South of the Northwest
corner of said Section 36, said point being the Southwest corner of
Lot 1, Block 5 of Stubblefield Addition, dated April 4, 1966; thence
S 88° 21' E, 1320 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 3, Block 7
of said Stubblefield Addition for a Point of Beginning; thence S 88°
21' E, 722.8 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 35 Rolling Meadows,
Phase I as filed October 20, 1976; thence S 01° 08' W, 184.6 feet along
the Northerly Boundary of said Rolling Meadows, Phase I; thence S
050 56' W, 300.0 feet along said Northerly Boundary; thence S 10°
24' W, 129.0 feet along said Northerly Boundary; thence N 88° 30' W,
365.1 feet along said Northerly Boundary; thence N 78° 25' W, 310.6
feet along said Northerly Boundary; thence N 88° 21' W, 280.7 feet
along said Northerly Boundary; thence N 01° 39' E, 278.9 feet; thence
N 88° 21' W 435.6 feet, thence N 01° 39' 280.0 feet to the South
line of Block 2, said Stubblefield Addition, thence S 88° 21' E
705.0 feet along said South line to the Point of Beginning.
Containing 16.05 acres, more or less.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1977.
APPROVED:
John Power, Chairman
•
•
RESOLUTION PC 43-77
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Monday, August 15, 1977, the
Fayetteville Planning Commission voted to approve the informal subdivision
plat dated , 19 , known as White River Homestead
Estates submitted by Daniel B. Thomas,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the City Planning Commission of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, hereby approves the final plat along with the land dedicated
for streets and other public uses in the White River Homestead Estates
Subdivision described as follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Part of Section 17 in Township 16 North of Range 29 West, and
being more particularly described as follows: to -wit: Beginning at
the Northwest Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter
of said Section 17, and running, thence East 2305.42 feet to the
centerline of White River, thence along said river centerline the
following bearings and distances: S 27° 0' E 299.12 feet, S 24° 47
E 278.55 feet, S 050 01' E 229.42 feet, S Ola 57' E 249.16 feet,
S 03° 06' W 349.82 feet, S 120 16' W, 292.91 feet, S 120 16' W
4.12 feet, S 29° 07' W 374.47 feet, S 340 19' W 319.46 feet, S
430 03' W 2.21 feet, S 430 03' W 441.13, feet, S 38° 35' W 425.35 feet,
S 17° 47' W 4.45 feet, S 17° 47' W 528.03 feet, S 18° 15' W 81.09
feet, S 19° 16' W 115.39 feet, S 39° 50' W 135.87 feet, S 840 37'
W 102.75 feet, N 88° 13' W 101.35 feet, S 89° 09' W 229.48 feet,
S 70° 02' W 239.16 feet, S 43° 39' W 52.21 feet, S 67° 31' W 245.91
feet, S 86° 16' W 282.16 feet to the South line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Said Section 17, thence West
along said forty line 58.01 feet to the Southwest Corner of last said
forty acre tract, thence North 792.0 feet, thence West 148.5 feet,
thence North 879.45 feet, thence East 148.5 feet, thence North
1150.83 feet, thence East 464.5 feet, thence North 468.6 feet, thence
West 74.50 feet, thence North 285.87 feet, thence West 360.0 feet to
the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
said Section 17, thence N orth along said forty line 345.87 feet to
the point of beginning, containing 179.05 acres, more or less. Subject
to that portion contained in County Road right of way along the west
side of herein described tract.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1977.
ATTEST:
Keith Newhouse, Secretary
APPROVED:
John Power, Chairman
•
•
•
•
RESOLUTION PC 44-77
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Monday, August 15, 1977, the Planning
Commission voted to approve the final subdivision plat dated
19 , known as Country Club Estates submitted by The Stanton Company; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that because the necessary
improvements have not been installed in said subdivision that The Stanton
Company enter into and furnish the City with the necessary subdivision contract
before the Board of Directors accepts this final subdivision plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. The necessary subdivision contract be executed with the
City prior to the Board of Directors accepting the final subdivision plat.
SECTION 2. That the City Planning Commission of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
hereby approves the final plat along with the land dedicated for streets and
other public uses in the Country Club Estates Subdivision described as follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 27, T -16-N, R -30-W, being more particularly described
as follows: Beginning at a point which is N 87° 11' 20" W
337.73 feet from the Southeast corner of the NW4 of the SW;,
Section 27, T -16-N, R -30-W; thence N 2° 48' 40" E 318.03 feet;
thence N 28° 00' 00" E 127.96 feet; thence N 57° 05' 00" E 353.07
feet; thence N 03° 06'4O'E'207.93 feet; thence N 70° 08' 30" W
339.85 feet; thence N 44° 47' 00" W 157.04 feet; thence S 28° 00'
00" W 265.53 feet; thence S 62° 00' 00" E 49.32 feet; thence S 28°
00'0" W397.32 feet; thence S 06° 08' 18" W 238.06 feet; thence
S 02° 48' 40" W 195.00 feet; thence S 87° 11' 20" E 350.00 feet
to the point of beginning.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
DAY OF , 1977.
APPROVED.
John Power, Chairman
•
•
•
•
RESOLUTION PC 45-77
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Monday, August 15, 1977, the Planning
Commission voted to approve the final subdivision plat dated
19 , known as Bassett Place submitted by Johnie $ Ora V. Bassett
and Ottis P, Winifred Harris; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that because the necessary
improvements have not been installed in said subdivision that Johnie P, Ora V.
Bassett and Ottis & Winifred Harris enter into and furnish the City with the
necessary subdivision contract before the Board of Directors accepts this
final subdivision plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. The necessary subdivision contract be executed with the
City prior to the Board of Directors accepting the final subdivision plat.
SECTION 2. That the City Planning Commission of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
hereby approves the final plat along with the land dedicated for streets
and other public uses in the Bassett Place Subdivision described as follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Part of the SE' of the SES of Section 23 and part of the
NE; of the NE1 of Section 26, Township 17 North, Range 30
West, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point which is S 89° 08' 13" W.724.44 feet from
the Southeast corner of said Section 23 and running thence S 0°
48' 49" E 139.62 feet; thence S 89° 14' W 211.06 feet to the East
right-of-way of U. S. Highway 71; thence N 1° 02' 25" W 39.64'. along
said right of way; thence N 82° 27' 47" W 176.70 feet along
said Highway right-of-way; thence N 51° 27' 28" W 162.0 feet along
said Highway right-of-way; thence N 0° 07' 15" E 36.70 feet along
said right-of-way thence N 88° 26' E 136.70 feet; thence N 1° 11' W
162.00 feet; thence S 88° 26' W 136.70 feet to the East right-of-way
of U. SI Highway 71; thence N 1° 07''46" W 151.80 feet along said
right-of-wT thence N 3° 48' E 101.20 feet along said right-of-way
thence N 89 08' 13" E 654.45 feet; thence S 0° 48' 49" E 420.00
feet; thence'N 89° 08' 13" W 150.00 feet; thence S 0° 48' 49" E 60.38
feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 7.66 acres, more or
less, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1977.
ATTEST.
Keith Newhouse, Secretary
APPROVED:
John Power, Chairman
•
•
•
•
RESOLUTION PC 46-77
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission,
Monday, August 15, 1977, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon
the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas
Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to
make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition
R77-22, Ken Lazenby.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning
from R-1, Low Density Residential District to R-2, Medium Density Residential
District, said real estate.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Part of the Southwest quarter (SW;) of the Southeast quarter (SE')
of Section Twenty-four (24) in Township Seventeen (17) North of
Range Thirty (30) West, and being more particularly described as
follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point which is 612.23 feet North
and 142.45 feet East of the Southwest corner of said 40 -acre
tract, thence along an existing fence line North 1 degree 03
minutes West 126.50 feet, thence along an existing 'fence line
South 80 degrees.43 minutes East 211.50 feet to the West
right-of-way of the Old Missouri Road, thence along said right-of-
way South 18 degrees 13 minutes West, 109.44 feet to the intersection
of an existing fence line, thence along said fence line, North 86
degrees 09 minutes West 172.50 feet to the point of beginning,
containing in all 0.513 acres exactly.
SECTION 2. That the above
Low Density Residential District
District, so that petitioner may
PASSED AND APPROVED this
described property be rezoned from R-1,
to R-2, Medium Density Residential'
develop property accordingly.
day of , 1977.
APPROVED:
John Power, Chairman
•
•
•
RESOLUTION PC 47-77
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Monday,
August 15, 1977, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the
property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times,
a newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to
make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition
R77-28, Enoch Bailey.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning
from A-1, Agricultural District to R-1, Low Density Residential District,
said real estate.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Part of the NE;, NE4, Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, being more
particularly described as beginning at the Northwest corner of
said 40 acre tract and running thence East 562 feet; thence South
1320 feet; thence West 95 feet; thence North 467 feet; thence West 467
feet; thence North 853 feet to the place of beginning, containing
12 acres more or less.
SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from A-1,
Agricultural District to R-1, Low Density Residential District, so that
petitioner may develop property accordingly.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of , 1977.
APPROVED:
John Power, Chairman
•
RESOLUTION PC 48-77
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Monday,
August 15, 1977, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the
property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times,
a newspaper of general circulation; and
WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to
make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R77-29,
James E. Lindsey.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning
from R-2, Medium Density Residential District to I-1, Heavy Commercial and
Light Industrial District, said real estate.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots Numbered Eight (8) and Nine (9), BLock numbered
Four (4), Parker's Plat of Valley View Acres, as per
plat on file in the office of the Circuit Clerk of
Washington County, Arkansas.
SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from R-2,
Medium Density Residential District to I-2, Heavy Commercial and Light
Industrial District, so that petitioner may develop property accordingly.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
day of , 1977.
APPROVED:
John Power, Chairman