Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-01-17 Minutes• MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was held at 5:00 P. M., Monday, January 17, 1977, in the Board of Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman John Power, Peg Anderson, Vice -Chairman Ernest Jacks, Keith Newhouse, Bill Kisor, John Maguire, Donald Nickell, Jack Ray, Rita Davis. MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: None. Bobbie Jones, Angie Medlock, Larry Wood, Scott Van Laningham, David McWethy, Pete Estes, Jr., Carrell Dean Whillock, Greg Dowers, Mrs. Marty, Rev. R. D. Riggs, Ken Lazenby, James Powell, Mr. F, Mrs. David Carter, Charles Hubbard, Charles Brewer, Dennis Hill, Polly Martin, James A. Pennington, Joe W. Segers, Wanda Yoe, Attorney Marshall Carlisle, Jim Lindsey, and other unidentified persons. Chairman John Power called the meeting to order and requested that Vice -Chairman Ernest Jacks conduct the meeting due to the fact that Chairman Power had been ill Peg Anderson noted that on Page 1 of the minutes, "some of the MINUTES most successfully built thoroughfares are located in that area" should read "some of the most successfully built thoroughfares are built along railroad tracks". With this correction, the minutes of the December 13, 1976, Planning Commission -t Meeting were approved as mailed. Vice -Chairman Jacks opened the public CARRELL DEAN $ VERA WHILLOCK hearing on Rezoning Petition No. R76-40 Rezoning Petition R76-40 Carrell Dean and Vera Whillock, to rezone NE corner of Hwy 71 South g Whillock property located on the Northeast corner of Highway 71 South and Whillock Street, from R-1, Low Density Residential District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District (that part not already C-2). Larry Wood summarized the recommendations contained within the Planning Report. Carrell Dean Whillock was present to represent. Mr. Whillock stated that he could better use his property if he could get it all zoned C-2. He said he needs to get the other 140 feet zoned the same as the rest of his property. Vice -Chairman Jacks noted that if the East 140 feet were zoned R-0 he could build offices, and a few limited types of sales would be allowed. Mr. Whillock said he would rather have it zoned so he could build something besides offices. Vice -Chairman Jacks stated that•200 feet is already zoned C-2. Larry Wood said the General Plan indicates commercial would be extended in a consistent line. Vice -Chairman Jacks stated that there should be a buffer between commercial and residential property and now there isn't a buffer. John Maguire noted that only having 200 feet zoned commercial limits the use of the land because of the required setbacks. Bobbie Jones said there would be a 50 foot setback from the right-of-way of Highway 71 and a 15 or 20 foot setback from the East line. There was no one present to oppose the petition. John Maguire moved to approve the rezoning petition, R76-40 as requested. Bill Kisor seconded the motion. Peg Anderson said she doesn't like the commercial being across the street from the private homes. The motion was passed 8-0-1, with Peg Anderson abstaining. Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -2- Vice-Chairman Jacks opened the public hearing WADE 4 PEGGY BISHOP on Rezoning Petition No. R76-41, Wade and Rezoning Petition R76-41 • Peggy Bishop, to rezone property located East East of Mission Blvd. $ North of Viewpoint of Mission Blvd. (Highway 45 East) and North of Viewpoint Drive, from R-1, Low Density Residential District to R-2, Medium Density Residential District. Vice -Chairman Jacks noted that the Commission had a request for this rezoning to be tabled. Chairman John Power asked Bobbie Jones if this was a written request and Bobbie Jones said it was a telephone call. Chairman Power moved to approve the request to table Rezoning Petition R76-41. Jack Ray seconded the motion. Bobbie Jones stated that the Commission could table this for 45 days. She noted that the Planning Office had received the following petition in opposition to this rezoning request: We the undersigned of the Harter's Fairview - Subdivision and adjoining neighborhood of single family dwellings request the Planning Commission and the Fayetteville Board of Directors to deny the rezoning of Petition Number R 76-41 from R-1 Low Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential. This denial is based on: (1) The neighborhood consists of established single family residents. (2) The area is zoned R-1 Low Density Residential except for one commercial zone. (3) The rezoning of the parcel would also constitute spot zoning. (4) The neighborhood consists of families working in Fayetteville and surrounding areas who are concerned with their neighborhood and the future of Fayetteville. Mr. F, Mrs. E. Rex Thompson Mrs. Joe D. Mitchell • Mr. $ Mrs. Jerry L. Delezen Mr. g Mrs. Winston Sloan • 1823 1833 1818 1807 The motion to table the rezoning request was Bobbie Jones agreed, at Vice -Chairman Jacks' for February 14, 1977. Vice -Chairman Ernest Jacks opened the public hearing on Rezoning Petition No. R76-42, Peter G. and Louise Estes to rezone property located West of Crossover Road (Highway 265) Viewpoint Viewpoint Viewpoint Viewpoint approved unanimously. request to put this back on the agenda PETER G. & LOUISE ESTES Rezoning Petition R76-42 West of Crossover & South of Hwy 45 East and South of Highway 45 East, from R-1, Low Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial District. Pete Estes, Jr., was present to represent. Planning Consultant Larry Wood said this rezoning is in keeping with the Highway 265 Land Use Plan, but he still doesn't recommend any commercial zoning that would allow intensive uses until public facilities are there the use. There is no sewer at this point. Peg Anderson questioned why this came back before the Planning Commission. Bobbie Jones said no petitions could be submitted within one year from the date of denial, but on this one, since it was for a different zoning request, the City Attorney had told her it would have to be processed. Pete Estes, Jr. said the property is approximately.525 feet along Highway 265 by 417 feet deep and lies approximately 300 feet from the intersection. He presented a map to the Planning Commission showing what zoning is intended for that area. He noted that C-1 divides in half the uses that are permitted in C-2. The property across the street is approximately 30 acres which is zoned C-2. Just north of the Estes property is a parcel which he understood the First National Bank is in the process of trying to obtain for a branch bank. West of that property is a mobile District to C-1, adopted zoning or to serve i Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -3- home park. On the Northeast corner of the intersection is Phillips' Grocery Store and on the Northwest corner of Highway 265 and 45 is a piece of property, he understands Mcllroy Bank is trying to obtain. Based on the characteristics of the property and the other uses in the surrounding area and the compatible land use, they would like to have it changed from R-1 to C-1. The public hearing was concluded. Peg Anderson stated that the only way the Planning Commission and the City can have any power over situations where sewer is not available is through zoning. As long as we don't have sewer service in that area, there is nothing to keep people from using septic tanks. Vice -Chairman Jacks asked if they are on record as turning down Large Scale Developments where there is no sewer available. Peg Anderson said the Planning Commission's only power is to keep from rezoning. Bobbie Jones said the Subdivision Committee may deny approval of a Large Scale Development if sewer is not available. Peg Anderson asked if this is one piece of property and Bobbie Jones said it is one 5 -acre tract Vice -Chairman Jacks mentioned that in order to subdivide it, Mr. Estes would have tocome back to the Planning Commission. Bobbie Jones said he could have three lot splits on the property without it coming back before the Planning Commission. Vice -Chairman Jacks asked Bobbie Jones if they could develop these lot splits on septic tanks without coming back before the Planning Commission and she said they could, unless the Planning Commission wished to stipulate otherwise. Keith Newhouse stated that this (commercial) is the way this property should eventually be zoned. This may put more pressure to put sewage in. Rita Davis stated that she agreed with Peg Anderson. Pete Estes stated that the property, at the present time, has no structures on it. John Maguire asked Larry Wood if this should ultimately be commercial and Larry Wood said "yes". His only reservation is the lack of sewer. Mr. Maguire said it seems that Mr. Estes would hesitate to build his sewer without knowing which direction (zoning) the Planning Commission would take in this area. He said he would like to send this on to the Board. Mr. Maguire said they wouldn't want to build sewer if they can't use the property. He said he would like to see it where he couldn't obtain a building permit until sewer is there. Vice -Chairman Jacks said the more appropriate thing to do would be to bring any lot splits on this property back to the Planning Commission. John Maguire moved to recommend to the Board of Directors that Rezoning Petition R76-42 be approved as petitioned and that there should not be any permits issued for building until sewer is available. Jack Ray seconded the motion. Mrs. Mary Ackerman, Highway 265, said the neighborhood opposition hasn't died down. She said the opposition had recently went to a meeting of the City Directors and the Board voted to return this to the Planning Commission for further study of the area. She asked the Planning Commission if they have restudied it. She said she is afraid this will set a precedent. Chairman John Power stated that rezoning this into commercial won't set a precedent. Vice -Chairman Jacks mentioned that the last item on the agenda for the meeting in progress is a report on the study of the intersection of Highway 265 and Highway 45. Peg Anderson stated that the Planning Commission should note the number of signatures on the petition presented two months ago to oppose Mr. Estes' earlier rezoning petition. Chairman John Power asked if this would be eventually "C" zoning instead of "R" and Larry Wood said it would. Larry Wood said he doesn't recommend any changes in the Land Use Plan at this time. The motion passed 7-2, with Power, Jacks, Newhouse, Kisor, Maguire, Ray and Davis voting "Aye" and Anderson and Nickell voting "Nay". • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -4- Vice-Chairman Jacks opened the public hearing on Rezoning Petition No. R76-43, Nancy A. Henderson, to rezone property located North of Deane Street and West of Garland Avenue (Highway 112), from R-1, Low Density Residential District to R-2, Medium Density Residential District. Greg Dowers was present to represent. Planning Consultant Larry Wood stated that there are presently single: -family developments on three sides. It is basically the only piece of property available for development in this area, and he sees putting R-2 zoning in as an intrusion. Vice -Chairman Jacks acknowledged the following petition in opposition. NANCY HENDERSON Rezoning Petition R76-43 North of Deane St. $ West of Garland We, the undersigned, who are residents and or property owners on Janice Avenue, Ward 4, Fayetteville, request the Planning Commission's consideration and approval of the following requests: 1. To deny the request for the re -zoning of Janice Street from single family dwellings to multi -family dwellings. 2. To reject any proposal to "spot -zone" any area on said street and change it from single family dwellings to multi -family dwellings. Marvin and Marian Harris Kay N. DuVal John DuVal Floyd and Nancy Tribble Robert Twiggs Jean Twiggs Margaret Seay Thomas Watson Ronnie Collins Mr. $ Mrs. Barron Mrs. A. J. Martin Harold E. Duggar Millie Duggar Jim Haskins Bertha McCoy Barbara Stefferud Ann Waligorski Conrad P. Waligorski James H. Moore Betty Lou Moore Marvin C. Bradley Dortha B. Bradley Earlene H. Riggs Darrell Riggs Shirley Stowe -Rains George Stowe -Rains Sharene Jordon Kenny McAlister Ruby N. McAlister 1766 1754 1754 1790 1775 1777 1753 1753 1778 1778 1832 1832 1900 1900 1820 1820 1820 1886 1806 Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Janice Ave. Greg Dowers said he would like to request the petition be tabled at this time due to the opposition. Chairman John Power asked Mr. Dowers if he understands the differences between R-1 and R-2 and he said he does. • Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -5- Vice-Chairman Jacks stated that if the petition is tabled, the Planning Commission would have to rehear this within 45 days. Mrs. Alfred Marti, 1776 Janice Street, said this street has been very quiet and safe for people to raise families. She said people who live there take a great deal of pride in their street, and they hope the Planning Commission will not consider allowing multi -family dwellings because of the increase of traffic and she feels this may set a precedent in the area. Rev. R. D. Riggs, 1900 Janice Street said three years ago he choose to live on Janice Street because it is single-family. He said there are plenty of places in Fayette- ville for duplexes and apartments without rezoning this piece of property. There is no place to park on the street now as it is. This would really make a traffic jam. The public hearing was concluded. Chairman John Power moved to table Rezoning Petition No. R76-43, Nancy A. Henderson. Bill Kisor seconded the motion, which was passed unanimously, by a vote of 9-0. Rita Davis asked that those who came to the meeting be notified before the rezoning is brought up again The sixth item for discussion was the request for KEN LAZENBY rehearing submitted by Ken Lazenby for a Duplex Request for Rehearing Conditional Use Request located on East Farmers East Farmers Drive Drive. The applicant now requests five duplexes, each with a street frontage of 80 feet. Ken Lazenby was present to represent. Mr. Lazenby apologized to the Planning Commission for having missed the former meeting. He said he was confused about the time of the meeting. Peg Anderson said this is a different request and he should go through the whole application request again. Rita Davis said this is a conditional use and not a rezoning and she thinks the Ordinance allows them to rehear with unanimous approval of the Commission. Bobbie Jones said this is correct, it is in the by-laws. Keith Newhouse mentioned that there was a lot of opposition last time this was brought up and asked if these people had been notified and Bobbie Jones said they had been. Chairman John Power said he thinks there is a legal question here and Mr. Lazenby said he had talked to City Attorney Jim McCord and he told Mr. Lazenby to follow this procedure. Bobbie Jones said the by-laws say that once final action is taken on a matter, a vote would have to be taken to rehear it. Bill Kisor moved to reopen the hearing for Ken Lazenby. John Power seconded the motion. The motion failed with Kisor, Power, Maguire, and Newhouse voting "Aye", and Anderson, Davis, Ray, and Nickell voting "Nay". Vice -Chairman Jacks abstained, for a vote of 4-4-1. Chairman John Power told Mr. Lazenby he would be willing to talk to him and City Attorney about this, and asked him to schedule a meeting later this week if possible. The next item for discussion was the request for JAMES POWELL a fourth lot split and a conditional use request Fourth Lot Split for a tandem lot submitted by James Powell for North of Maple $ West of Gray property located North of Maple Street and West of Gray Avenue. James Powell was present to represent. Vice -Chairman Jacks said the Subdivision Committee recommended the approval of the fourth lot split with the provision that the present utility easement along the west side of the property be changed to read "utility and street" easement, in case there is a need in the future to bring a street in on that particular side. Jim Powell said this request is to build a house on that piece of property. • • 1 Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -6- Vice-Chairman Jacks said this fits the reason behind a tandem lot ordinance. He said there has been two contacts with the Planning Office, a phone call from Mrs. Charlton noting that the lot is below the sewer main and stating that she is not in favor of a septic tank and she also notes the street extension possibilities. The other contact was from Gordon McNeil, 629 Gray Avenue, who expressed the same concerns. Peg Anderson asked what the size of the lot is and Jim Powell said it is two acres. No one was present to oppose the request. Bobbie Jones said the Street Superintendent recommended that Maple be constructed to the west line of Rev. Salmon's property. Chairman John Power made a motion to accept the conditional use for a tandem lot for the property on Maple. He amended his motion to accept the conditional use for the property on Maple contingent upon their changing the present utility easement along the west side of the property to read "street and utility" easement. Donald Nickell seconded the motion, which was passed unanimously, by a vote of 9-0. Vice -Chairman Ernest Jacks opened discussion on ROBERT DAVID CARTER the eighth item, a conditional use request for Conditional Use Request a roller skating rink in the I-1, Heavy Southeast corner of Ash $ Chestnut Commercial and Light Industrial District, submitted by Robert David Carter, for property located on the Southeast corner of Ash Street and Chestnut Avenue. Bobbie Jones reminded the Planning Commission that Mr. Carter would have to process a Large Scale Development if this is approved. Mr. Carter said he is aware that there is some opposition to this. He showed the Commission pictures of what he is.proposing to build. He said a business which involves that much money to build Would certainly be well supervised, and times of operation would be restricted. He is planning to have 2 days per week for parties, afternoon sessions, family night, and would expect to have about 150 people on Friday and Saturday nights. He said people would not be permitted to go in and out during a session. He mentioned that the problem of people congregating in the parking lot had come up, and said he plans to make such people leave. He stressed the fact that alcohol would not be any part of the business and would not be permitted in the building. He said he understood that there is supposed to be a bridge built over Scull Creek on Sycamore and Sycamore opened from College to Garland and that would provide another access into the skating rink. He mentioned some of the other things which are allowed in that zone, such as swimming pools, automobile sales, etc., and many of these other things would generate a lot more traffic than a skating rink. Charles Hubbard, 664 West Ash, (Red Ball Transfer and Storage) presented the following petition signed by 15 property owners and businesses in the area in opposition to the request. We, the undersigned property owners and businessmen of the surrounding property subject to the conditional use request submitted by Mr. R. D. Carter do hereby oppose said request due to the: (1) Inadequacy of access and egress to the proposed site. (2) Proposed business creating additional traffic which would substantially increase the overloading and congestion of Poplar Street and other existing roads which are already inadequate for the heavy truck and automobile traffic which they are presently asked to handle. r Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 1 • 1V 5111 -4 • • -7- Lu 2 J ncdvI t-{ O. gAu.e. 9-/ (fir +, d. 2:49'71 G `ikt- s � 0;)11-445.12e,./'1l w :,• YfiZ_ d -J 1 41 4 - Charles Brewer, Brewer's Delivery Service, (Acting agent for Mistletoe Express) speaking for Mr. John Lilley, objected because of the traffic and the flow of people in and out of the skating rink. He said Mistletoe Express had looked for 6-8 months to find a quiet industrial place to put in their business. When they bought the property they understood this would be industrial businesses only. They need a place with a small amount of traffic flow which is still accessible to a large part of the city. Mr. Lilley had told him there have been businesses such as this built where they have buildings in other cities and there has been a tremendous amount of vandalism and break-ins because of this. Mr. Brewer said this street is narrow (30 feet). They have trucks coming in both day and night. They feel that with a skating rink there would be more people in and especially in the evenings around the business, since they are located directly across the street from where the skating rink is proposed. He said he is all for young children at the skating rink, but older people would be there. He had talked with some of the people at the city when they were proposing to build and they didn't think Sycamore would be opened for some time. Joe Segers stated that something would be put in there, if the skating rink wasn't. It is a shame that there is no one place in the City of Fayetteville that children can go at night. Someone who's willing to invest in putting in a nice skating rink in a nice neighborhood and that will be well supervised should be allowed. It seems we have an opportunity to add something to the City. If it is well built, well super- vised, and will close at 10:00 or 11:00, he feels the Planning Commission would be making a mistake to say they don't want this in their city. Dennis Hill said one thing brought up was the fact that access roads are crowded now. He said there are streets even more crowded. This would benefit the whole community. Vandalism is a problem for any business. Traffic is a problem but it doesn't stop people from coming into their business. David Carter asked Larry Wood what the status of the opening of Sycamore is. Larry Wood said he thought the money was appropriated, but he wasn't sure. He said the traffic is poor for industrial at this time but the Arkansas Highway Department is about to build Gregg into a four -lane between Township Road and North Street. The Sycamore bridge should have been built by now. There is a minor arterial proposed just north of this location (south of University Farm) that would connect Gregg to Old Wire Road. Mr. Wood said he thought there is also needed an access to North Street through this industrial area to keep the trucks out of the residential area. • • • Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -8- Bobbie Jones said the residential property owners to the west may not be aware of the proposed skating rink because there is about a half block of undeveloped land between the proposed skating rink and the residential area. Mr. Brewer said there was only one notice mailed out, just before the first meeting. None of the people with whom he has talked are aware of it. Mr. Hubbard said everytime he asks when Sycamore is going to be opened he gets a very evasive answer. He said it was supposed to be opened seven years ago. He asked if Mr. Carter could assure them that parking would be adequate. He is also concerned about the children being out in the street waiting for their parents to pick them up. He stated that he is not opposed to skating in general, but he would like to see it located somewhere else in the community. It seems to be incompatible with what is already permitted there. David Carter said there is more than an acre available for parking. One parking space is needed for every 200 square feet of building; 90 parking spaces are required. He said there would not be a knob on the door from the inside so people would not be free to come and go as they please. Rita Davis asked what he means about not being a knob on the door and he said there would be a button to push to let people out. The public hearing was concluded. Bobbie Jones again said this would require processing of a large scale development if the conditional use is approved. Peg Anderson said she has had children attend skating parties and they seemed to be well supervised. Peg Anderson moved to approve the conditional use of the skating rink. Bill Kisor seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-2-1 with Newhouse, Nickell, Kisor, Anderson, Maguire, and Ray voting "Aye" and Davis and Jacks voting '!Nay". Power abstained from voting. Chairman Power left the meeting at this point (6:43 P. M.) The next item for discussion was the request POLLY MARTIN for a renewal of the temporary conditional Temporary Conditional Use use request for a real estate sales office Highway 16 East in the R-1, Low Density Residential District, submitted by Polly Martin, located on Highway 16 East. Donald Nickell moved to reapprove the conditional use for one year. Peg Anderson seconded the motion, which was passed unanimously, by a vote of 8-0. (Chairman Power was out of the room when the vote was taken). The next item for discussion was a feasibility E. H. SONNEMAN study for a Planned Unit Development on the Feasibility Study of a PUD west side of Deane Solomon Road (between the West side of Dean Solomon Road Trailwood Mobile Home Park and Razorback Golf Course). E. H. Sonneman, Developer, requested the Planning Commission's feelings prior to undertaking annexation, rezoning, and engineering. Proposed PUD shows 114 units on 15.96 acres. James A. Pennington was present to represent Mr. Sonneman. Vice -Chairman Jacks said the Subdivision Committee recommended that the Planning Commission approve the concept of a Planned Unit Development on the West side of Deane Solomon Road. John Maguire asked Mr. Pennington where this was located from the pro shop and he said it is directly south. Mr. Nickell said he feels this is an excellent area. Peg Anderson moved to approve the concept of a Planned Unit Development in this area Donald Nickell seconded the motion, which was passed unanimously, by a vote of 8-0. (Chairman Power was absent from the room when the vote was taken). Planning Commission Meeting January 17, 1977 -9- Chairman Jacks opened discussion on the approval of the preliminary plat of Sassafras Row Addition located outside the City, North of Highway 45 East and East of Sassafras Road; Joe W. and Gail T. Segers, Developers. Chairman Power re-entered the room at 6:49 P. M. SASSAFRAS ROW ADDITION Final Plat North of Hwy 45 East $ East of Sassafras Road Vice -Chairman Jacks said the Subdivision Committee voted to recommend approving this as a final plat (since it is outside the City) with the contingency that Mr. Segers submit signatures of the adjoining property owners. Bill Kisor moved to approve this final plat with the contingency stated above. Keith Newhouse seconded the motion, which was passed unanimously, by a vote of 9-0. The next item for discussion was the approval of the final plat of the Replat of Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 2 and Lots 6, 7, 8, 10, Block 3 of Shelton Addition, located North of Highway 45 East and East of Shelton Road (outside City); Developers. Vice -Chairman Jacks said the Subdivision Committee voted final plat of the Replat. .John Power made a motion to approve the final plat. Peg which was passed unanimously, by a vote of 9-0. T. EWING $ ALICE G. SHELTON Final Plat of Replat of Block 2 $ 3 Shelton Addition T. Ewing and Alice G. Shelton, to recommend approving this Anderson seconded the motion, The next item for discussion was a request from RELOCATION OF ELKINS PLANNING the Town of Elkins for the Fayetteville AREA BOUNDARY Planning Commission (and City Board) to approve the relocation of the Elkins Planning Area Boundary to coincide with the Fayetteville Planning Area Boundary in the area of Lake Sequoyah. No one was present to represent. Bobbie Jones said their proposal is to relocate their Planning Area Boundary to coincide with the Fayetteville City Limits, which is what the Fayetteville boundary is supposed to do. She said there is an error in the legal description of the Fayette- ville Planning Area Boundary (or the City Limits Boundary one) which Fayetteville should correct. Peg Anderson moved to approve the relocation of the Elkins Planning Boundary with the proper people making the corrections. Bill Kisor seconded the motion, which was passed unanimously. The last item for discussion was the report INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 45 from Planning Consultan Larry Wood on a study EAST f HIGHWAY 265 STUDY of the land use and zoning of the intersection cf Highway 45 East and Highway 265 (Crossover Road). Larry Wood summarized the report, which reaffirmed the existing amended land use plan for Highway 45 East and Highway 265. Keith Newhoi4e moved that the Planning Commission send Larry Wood's report, which recommends no change in the present Land Use Plan, to the Board of Directors with a favorable recommendation. John Power seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. The Commission decided to hold the next meeting on January 24th because two items had already been advertised for hearings on that date. The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 P. M. • • • RESOLUTION PC 1-77 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Monday, January 17, 1977, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R76-40, Carrell Dean and Vera Whillock. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That.an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District (that part not already C-2), said real estate. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Ni„ NWy, Section 33, T -16-N, R -30-W, described as follows, to wit: Beginning at the NW corner of the NEe, NW,i-„ Section 33, and running thence East 315 feet, thence South 200 feet, thence West 105 feet, thence South 10 feet, thence West 235.57 feet to the East line of the right of way of U. S. Highway 71, thence in a Northerly direction along the East line of said Highway right of way to the North line of said 80 acre tract, thence East 21.2 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, containing 14 acres, more or less. SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District (that part not already C-2), so that the petitioner may develope property accordingly. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1977. APPROVED: Ernest Jacks, Vice -Chairman • • • RESOLUTION PC 2-77 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Monday, January 17, 1977, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R76-42, Peter G. and Louise Estes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential District to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District, said real estate. LEGAL DESCRIPTION• Part of the SE4i SE4„ Section 2, T -16-N, R -30-W, being more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point which is 313 feet South of the NE corner of said 40 acre tract and running thence South 525 feet, thence West 417 feet 4 inches, thence North 525 feet, thence East 417 feet 4 inches to the place of beginning, containing 5 acres, more or less. SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District, so that the petitioner may develope property accordingly. PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of , 1977. APPROVED: Ernest Jacks, Vice -Chairman • • • RESOLUTION PC 3-77 WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Monday, January 17, 1977, the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the final ,subdivision plat dated , 19 , known as Sassafras Row Addition submitted by Jow W, Jr. and Gail T. Segers and NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVII.T,F, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. That the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas accept the final plat along with the land dedicated for streets and other public uses in the Sassafras Row Addition described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the EA of the SE; of Section 28, T=17 -N, R -29-W, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 1043.3 feet South of the Northeas corner of the SE,i--, of said section 28; thence West 990 feet; thence S 00°06'05" E 1130 7 feet; thence N 89°57'30" E, 978.1 feet; thence N 0°28'13" W, 987.04 feet; thence East 20 feet; thence North 143 feet to the point of beginning, containing 25.24 acres more or less. PASSED AND APPROVED this ATTEST: Rita Davis, Secretary day of , 1977. APPROVED: Ernest Jacks, Vice -Chairman • PLANNING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1977 0 H o O m ti G) C O 4-3 •.i 3 X 2 0 O H 0 b0 0,42 H 0 N X 1-1 1.i ro 4-3 m W o Il January 10 X X X X X X X 1.111 January 24 X X X X X X X X X February 14, 1977 X X X X X X X X X February 28, 1977 X X - X X X X X 11.1111111.111.1111111111.11 X X X X X X X X X X X March 14, 1977 March 28, 1977 April 11, 1977 X X X X X X X X April 25, 1977 X X X X X X X X X X X X —1.11111.111111. X X X X X X X X X May 9, 1977 May 23, 1977 ne 13, 1977 X X X X X X X MEM _ June .ec2a eeting 20, 1977 X X x X X x X SEEM= 111.1.1111.1 JUNE JUNE 27 1977 July 11, 1977 X X X X X X X X July 18, 1977 X X X X X X X July 23, 1977 X X X X X X August 15, 1977 X X ; :` X,.. i'..x'• 1.11111.1111/111 August 22,1977 X X x X X X X August 297 1977. ;. ` X X X X X X X X • September''12, 1977 X . X X X g X.,W X'. 11.111.111=11111 uminuSga - September416, 1977; - 4 iir;'11.11.111.111111Octotier 1'6°'•1977°' Octotier 2 : 1477- ' :;.X. Ilkovemb'er 14, 1977 November •28, 19177 :. X December 12, 1977 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X DATE RES # RESOLUTIONS APPLICANT/NO. APP. DENY H9_871 Pc 1-7-7 K7co-yah ck, x PC 2-77 2 7(o-ya hArb, x Pc 3-9•7 4 .o -a) ( G -e- cpe ) Pc )1-17 cSk akek Qddctc,il •Lt. plat- -) i -ay -D7 Pc 5-77 X K71-1 Z,c,1ca P c to -77%� 4'`J L�.( A- AS -'27 Pc7-77 710-LiI '84/J. -Ala) X PCS -77 CZmvnu¢. 6/14 c; .�c.v Pc -9 -77 ar+n-�cd -/mss 3-14/-77 Pc /o-77 1277-3 7 %4W X Pc 11-77 K77- 9 S,tt 1 0 : ' x Pc 12.-77 k17-5 2.9. e (i , Id) x • Pc I3 -77 O n trtzi 91d c na xc_.-) 2-1-11-77 Pc. E/-77 'J ( ci(axci. 1i 027( 5) 4rloc%la ai/iat) Pc_ IS -77 /c77-8 11(eitoA) x Pc 1(0-77 277-9 PDQ. x PC 17-77 £.77-/0 /ZJ.cEia e. X -as-97 Pc- /8-77 x ,km c1 ,bat ( -41. eat) Pc /9-77 £'7-i a i00,04,)- a.Qdni G., (0✓rKb,,lid) . Pc m -97 le 77- a 671vutim.) X Pc a1-77 646-1t.n.e.:n(� Qftrinnzt 5-1-77 Pc as -77 e77- 6, N7 o sfieide..2 X Pc- 23 -in c x ,l°'7-13 _, Pc air:/77 e°7-14, % x 13-77 Pc a5-77 /277-/I � (.GZrnt,n) X x Pc. a(-77 /2'77-15 eta,, ,, i Pc- 97-77 ie -'77 -/to etc4 X DATE RES k RESOLUTIONS APPLICANT/NO. -a APP. -.DENY 5-a3-77 pcak-77 £77 -Ji V PG aq-77 £'17-ia XY x ,t VW ('.al Pc20-17 &#) (o-13-'77 PC 31-77 ie'77-19 / 1 1 X .,..-J £77 Pc3a77 -an J& JC ra X . (-a7-77 Pc 33-77 IS4. Ig�np (Pun c,naiPeal) 7-11-77 PC 34-77 12 77-a-1 �/16Vna. �Q2"-,.) X X PC 35-17 /e 1c23 A VA; 1..A . Pc 310 -27A) -ti, a t"� itOrial - 7-1R-77 Pr_ 37-77 _Qos1.titara41 lpc2)8-77 (? .) a �� • p-77 Pc 39-77 k77 -ay 09.eAA a * X ii PC YO -77 e 77-a 5 d uy, -wilkuino x k -77-2(0 4- a..- (itihrAd Pc N1-77 x.77 -a'7 6the.a3G�L�L x A_)5.-7-7 pc in-y-7/PM!& .Pa ua ( ) et Pc J3-77 / i -a-- u..� Pc Wq-77 �� (6, tar �,tas., (Jona 0 fic f) Pr. hJs-71 '&2aQtt (1'.(7.aw .()rio L ` ) 0 I� y6-77 ,P77 -2a ediu_ '• , / X Q '' Pr. t/7-77 £`77 e-4 X -a8 -G P'c 218-77 ,e 71 -aa c. x ate 77 Pc. 49-77 ci6i[.r,H l (*eat..., (X-rtaiL n ..v (c') . PG 60-77 /277- 31 6-TAL.L4..) X illa.9- 77 PC 51.77 /e t17 -3a oY,zatA. x a- 77 PG sa-'77 k '77- 33 laid_ lata ka..Q. x DATE RES. H RESOLUTIONS APPLICANT/NO. APP. DENY w •' .r. .._ . . • W 1 -1? -77 £?th,. ( SA- /1d) Pc 53-'77 d3 d ,nLt . x Pc.. 54-7 7 £2.0 9 �ol .. ( 41,71.2iLL rI6,e) a -9b-77 l0-10-77 Pc ss -ii /Qyi_cc., it>)0 a.w (ivna.2. (plat) PC 5(0-'17 .'7-7-3 y Thar 4. O hacl_...- (It.QAtt-,.1 It) x Pc 57-7y l277-39 6)0.c1-0... x t0 as -77 PC 'g'-77 //&vitt 1 kl& 1Jtt_) L�totti tan1- ( f f Jc Pc. 59-77 1- ChaA, (.totL aCiti--2) 0141.4.(2-•,ipt.±) PC 496-77 2..77-3g IQa . (nY i°) X Pc. 1,1--1 7 £.77- 3q lAti Y 0C -I X PC 1'2-77 2.77- 2j �t�A (a/rnih,itj) x .a Pc t,3-77 /Q'77 -q1 O. la.Fhi.t✓ x Ll -77 Pc 104-T7 R 77- f c..3%i2o2.Q c9htu 4.6-0 x i Pc &5-77 4_.Q kan wil teheyw, t 11-2k-77 Pc &lo -7'7 t3)aZluci,._) .gti...ovexiifrrof-r.. (yz-nuQ t) x PC 117-77 R-77-44 A. x jia..4cPn,..2.) Pc log -71 )C77 -'s /3dc_t;itt-} 7c 2-1)--7-1 - en -to / Fc. 69-71 ._, , , vgiorAict X Pc 7U- 77 A9177 -q8 rnx ( lie 71-'77 i/Zui tali cati PUD, ItAiak. x .1.. g .. r r -. .v. }1i\ thio w •' .r. .._