Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-01-13 Minutes• MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission was held Tuesday, January 13, 1976, at 4:00 P. M, in the Board of Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Ernest Jacks, Peg Anderson, Vice -Chairman John Power, Keith Newhouse, Bill Kisor, Rita Davis, Jack Ray. John Maguire, Donald Nickell. Larry Wood, David McWethy, Bobbie Jones, Janet Bowen, Sam and James Mathias, Gordon Houston, David Horne, Ken Lazenby, J. E. McClelland, Doyle Hall, John Lavallard, Mrs. Allen, Allen Bridges, Kenneth Cox, Donna Bair, Dale Evans, Truman Smith, Jim Akin, Alan Beauchamp, Jim Dickson, Wayne Ball, John Box. Vice -Chairman John Power called the meeting to order. Rita Davis arrived late and only 6 members were present at call to order. The minutes of the December. 9, 1976 Planning Commission meeting were approved as mailed. MINUTES Report from Larry Wood H. L. MATHIAS REZONING The first item was a report by Planning Consultant Larry Wood of the area surrounding the H. L. Mathias Rezoning Petition such area being South of the Square, North of Archibald Yell Boulevard and South Street, West of College Avenue, and East of School Avenue. Mr. Wood pointed out the General Land Use Plan and zoning in the concerned area and pointed out that the General Plan called for public use in the area under application. He was concerned about the application opening up more commercial in the area and also about access onto Archibald Yell; therefore, he basically recommended that the zoning be left R-0. REZONING PETITION R75-26 Sam and James Mathias were present to represent H. L. Mathias Rezoning Petition R75-26 and stated that they had access onto both Block Avenue and Archibald Yell, and they had not had any traffic problems in the past. They felt that the only other possible property that could develop for commercial would be across Block Avenue, .anddid. not thinkthis rezoning would open up strip commercial. They said they needed this rezoned because of a non -conforming sign and they would like to construct another building in:. the future. In answer to inquiries by the Planning Commission about how close the G7.4 Zoning would come to this area, Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones stated that the regulations for C-4 Zoning was approved but so far there had not been any petitions to rezone property. She said the Planning Commission had indicated it would consider petitions only as far South as:_Rock Street. There was no -opposition present. The public hearing was closed. After further discussion, Keith Newhouse moved to deny Rezoning Petition R75-26, H. L. Mathias. Ernest Jacks seconded and the motion, to deny was approved 4-2 with Jacks, Newhouse, Anderson, and Power voting "Aye and Kisor and Ray voting "Nay". Planning Commission -2- January 13, 1976 REZONING PETITION R75-32 Public hearing was opened on,Rezoning Petition R75-32, Gordon R. Houston Gordon R. Houston, to rezone property located on the Porter Rd $'Deane St. Southeast corner of the intersection of Porter Road and Deane Street from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District. At the request of Vice -Chairman John Power the following letter in opposition to the petition is hereby made a part of these minutes: "January 3, 1976 Mr. Ernest Jacks Secretary, Planning Commission City Administration Building Fayetteville, AR 72701 We, the undersigned property owners on Porter Road and Deane Street, do strongly protest Petition No. R75-32, whereby Gordon R. Houston requests rezoning property from R-1, Low Density Residential, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District. 5/ S/ S/ S/ S/ S/ S/ SI Donna L. Bair Jessie Lee Dunaway Jeff J. Black Beulah H. Parkhurst Kenneth M. Cox Larry A M (last name Mary F. Melvin Glenn Melvin S/ S/ S/ S/ S/ illegible) 5/ S/ Mrs. Ben Porter Nellie Barrentine Mrs. W. A. Smith Opal Hart Mrs. Lee Hughes Byrna R. Bridges Allen C. Bridges" Larry Wood gave the Planning Report recommending the change to R-2. He did not recommend approval of this a year ago because of the lack of sewer facilities. Mr. Wood said sewer is presently under construction and should be available by summer. Attorney David Horne along with Mr. Houston were present to represent. Mr. Horne pointed out that there was already a diversity of uses in the area and that there was only one dwelling on Deane Street that was not rental property. He said Mr. Houston also owned the property immediately to the South which would serve as a buffer from the residential, and that Mr. Houston's usage of the property (duplexes) would be planned to enhance rather than decrease property values. Mrs. Allen, 2323 Deane Street, said that all the property on Deane Street from Porter Road to Sang Avenue was "home" owned except for the duplex on the corner and she would like to see the area stay under private ownerships. Kenneth Cox (1525 Porter Rd.), Donna Bair (1594 Porter Rd.),and Allen Bridges (16 72 Porter Rd.) all felt that this was a quiet neighborhood and the R-2 Zoning would create more traffic and affect drainage. Mr. Bridges, who just recently purchased property in that area, indicated that he would move if it were rezoned to R-2. In answer to some of the Commissioners' questions, Mr. Houston said that the lot that would serve as a buffer had 100 foot frontage on Porter Road and was about 350 feet deep. He said access to the property requested for rezoning would be on Deane Street. Mr. Horne said they understood that duplexes were allowed in an R-1 Zone but that there was a square footage problem and they would be allowed to build more units in the R-2 Zone. The public hearing was concluded. Ernest Jacks agreed with Larry Wood's principle of mixing multi -family with single-family but indicated that he was sympathetic with those present in opposition. A • ri• Planning Commission -3- January 13, 1976 Peg Anderson felt this mixture of usage did not always degrade property values as adjoining property owners sometimes felt and that the economy would eventually force mixed housing. Bill Kisor moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of Rezoning Petition R75-32, Gordon R. Houston. The motion, seconded by Keith Newhouse, was approved unanimously by a vote of 6-0. REZONING PETITION R75-33 Vice -Chairman Power opened the public hearing on McBroom, McBroom Rezoning Petition R75-33, Homer McBroom, Julia McBroom, Meredith and Hinkle Bulah Meredith, Lillian Hinkle, and Ken Lazenby (Realtor), Happy Hollow Road to rezone property located on the West side of Happy Hollow Road (Highway 16 By -Pass) between 15th Street (Highway 16 By -Pass) and Huntsville Road from R-1, Low Density Residential, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District. Planning Consultant Larry Wood gave the Planning Report recommending approval of the rezoning. Since this was under four different ownerships, only one of which had more than one acre, he did recommend that the ordinance be written as one piece of property and that building permits not be issued until a joint large scale development plan was approved. He felt the City Attorney should be contacted concerning the legality of this recommendation. Realtor Ken Lazenby was present to represent. He said there were proposals ranging from an automotive service to a fast food service 'if the property could be rezoned to C-2. He said each property owner involved in this was in accordance to selling this as one piece of property if that could be arranged. Mr. McBroom, owner of the major portion of the property under application was present but did not make any comments. There was no one present in opposition, and the public hearing was closed. Peg Anderson was concerned that without a large scale development plan the parking could become very hazardous and it could also end up strip commercial. Ernest Jacks was more concerned about driveways onto Highway 16. Ernest Jacks then moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of Rezoning Petition R75-33 but to accept it as a large scale development rather than 5 pieces of separate property; also to contact the City Attorney concerning the legality of this contingency. The motion was seconded by Jack Ray and approved unanimously 6-0. Public hearing was opened on Rezoning Petition R75-34, Flowers F, Interior Accessories by Doyle REZONING PETITION R75-34 Flowers P, Interior Accessories by Doyle On Behalf of Nell Brown, Property Owner 107-111 West Lafayette on behalf of Mrs. Robert (Nell) Brown (Property Owner), to rezone property located on the Southwest corner of the intersection of Lafayette Street and Highland Avenue (107-111„West Lafayette)from R-0, Residential Office District, to C-1, Neighborhood.. Commercial District. Planning Consultant Larry Wood gave the Planning Report in which he did not recommend the rezoning for the following reasons: (1) Request for C-1 District would place residential --uses in between two commercial districts. (2) Request for rezoning to C-1 would tend to commit other properties in the area to commercial zoning and further erode a residential area. (3) Existing R-0 District permits a variety of use suitable for the structure involved in this application. The following memo is hereby made a part of these minutes at the Vice -Chairman's request: • • Planning Commission -4- January 13, 1976 "January 9, 1976 TO: City Planning Commission FROM: Bobbie Jones, Planning Administrator SUBJECT: Rezoning Petition to rezone Mrs. Robert (Nell) Brown's property at 107-111 West Lafayette Mrs. J.S. Treece, 113 West Lafayette called the Planning Office today to talk about the above rezoning petition. She said in addition to the residence, electronics shop, and flower shop on this property, there are also at least 3 apartments. She said they do not park in front of the two shops, but park all down the side of the street, even blocking the cut in the curb which makes it possible to get onto her property. She has an apartment rented out to a young man and the situation with parking is so bad that her renter has had to get permission from the I. G. A. so he can park on their parking lot. Mrs. Treece said she has always been friends with the Browns and does not really object to the rezoning and thinks the flower shop itself is "just grand", but she does object to the parking situation. Her house is immediately West of the flower shop. Mrs. Treece is 89 years old and could not be present at the Planning Commission meeting herself and asked that+I-pass this information on to you. S/ Bobbie Jones" Rita Davis arrived at 5:01 P. M. J. E. McClelland (1216 N. Vandeventer), a long time friend of Mrs. Brown was present representing Mrs. Brown who is recovering from major surgery. He felt this would not encourage commercial because of setback and parking problems in this area and he felt that a flower shop was more compatible with residential area than some of the uses allowed in the R-0 District and certainly more so than the Red Cross office which had previously been located in this building. He said there would be less of a parking problem with the flower shop usage than there was with the Red Cross office. He said Mr. Hall (operator .of the flower shop) indicated that a lot of the parking in front was a result of people inquiring about the location of the Red Cross building. He said when Lafayette was widened, a few years ago it took a strip of land which was street right-of-way but was used for parking and this created the limited parking situation. He said the parking was not as bad as Mrs. Treece had indicated in her telephone call. Vice -Chairman Power pointed out that restaurants (without entertainment) were allowed in the R-0 Zone on appeal to the Planning Commission and that that use certainly required more parking than a flower shop. Doyle Hall (operator of the flower shop) said he did not anticipate any more than 5 cars parked at any one (including holidays) since he did most of his business by telephone. He said he had been in the building approximately 2 months and thought at the time it would be okay since the Red Cross office had been located there previously to this. He confirmed Mr. McClelland's statement about the inquiries into the location of the Red Cross office. • • • Planning Commission -5- January 13; 1976• John Lavallard (owner of a small electronic service at 109 West Lafayette) said he used to have to park in the I. G. A. parking lot when the Red Cross office was located in there and he was now free to park in front of his premises. Note: Mr. Lavallard has been operating at that location for approximately 21 years without a Certificate of Occupancy and when asked about this Mr. Lavallard said he had been living in Fayetteville for 27 years and knew nothing about any zoning requirements. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones said that a Certificate of Occupancy was required by ordinance but that people did not always realize this and sometimes went into business without first checkingwith the Planning Office. She also explained that this could not be treated.as a change of non -conforming use since the Red Cross office located there previous to the flower shop was a permitted use in the R-0 Zone under "Social and welfare agencies" which is listed under Use Unit 12. Dale Evans (400 Mission Blvd.) said he walked this way every day on his way to the University and stated he was concerned about the safety of children having to cross this intersection and the traffic problem it would create if this were rezoned to C-1. He felt that the traffic was bad enough already. After further discussion the public hearing was concluded. Mr. Newhouse wondered about the possibility of Mr. Hall using this more for a studio since this would be allowed under the R-0 Zone. However, Mr. Hall stated that it would mainly be used for the flower shop usage. Peg Anderson felt the parking situation on Lafayette would not be alleviated no matter what usage went in at that location. It was the general feeling of the Planning Commission that they would prefer having the flower shop there as to some of the uses permitted in the R-0 Zone but they did not feel that it should be rezoned. The only other alternative, as mentioned by Planning Consultant Larry Wood, was to amend the ordinance to include flower shops in the R-0 Zone. It was pointed out, however, that amending the ordinance would take time and in the meantime Mr. Hall, along with Mr. Lavallard, were operating in violation of the ordinance. After considerable discussion Keith Newhouse moved to deny Rezoning Petition R75-34. The motion was seconded by Peg Anderson and approved unanimously 7-0. Ernest Jacks felt that the uses in the R-0 Zone should be investigated and Vice -Chairman Power suggested that it could be put on a later agenda. REZONING PETITION R75-35 The Vice -Chairman then opened the public hearing on Leo Peel Rezoning Petition R75-35, Leo Peel to rezone property Highway 71B (South School) located East of Highway 71B (South School Avenue), West of Grandview Apartments, and extending from 24th Street (Country Club Road) on the North to 26th Street on the South from C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District. Planning Consultant Larry Wood gave the Planning Report in which he recommended approval of the rezoning. He did note that the depth of the C-2 District would be reduced to a point where there would be a potential loss in value and restriction of possible uses. Attorney Truman Smith was present to represent Mr. Peel. He said Grandview Apartments was to the East of this property and that the remaining frontage on Highway 71 South is also owned by Mr. Peel. He pointed out that Mr. Peel was asking for a lesser zoning district (dezoning). In answer to questions about future plans, Mr. Smith said apartments would probably be built. Mr. Power commented that it would have to be processed as a large scale development before this could be done. There was no opposition to the request. • • • ,i Planning Commission -6- January 13, 1976 Ernest Jacks moved to recommend to the Board oe Directors the approval of Rezoning Petition R75-35, Leo Peel. Jack. Ray seconded the motion.. The vote to approve was unanimous. REZONING PETITION R75-36 Public hearing was opened on Rezoning Petition R75-36, City of Fayetteville City of Fayetteville to rezone the following de- Fayetteville Public School District scribed properties owned by the Fayetteville Public School District: ' Tract E: Ramay Junior High School, Fayetteville High School West Campus, etc., located West of Sang Avenue, South of Stone Street, and North of Old Farmington Road to rezone from R-1, Low Density Residential District. to P-1, Institutional District, Tract F: Site for future school located East of Crossover Road (Highway 265) and North of Highway 45 (Mission Boulevard), to rezone from R-1, Low Density Residential District to P-1, Institutional District. Tract G: Asbell Elementary School located North of Lawson Street,. South of Lewis Avenue, to rezone from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to P-1, Institutional District. Planning Consultant Larry Wood gave a summary of why the schools were being rezoned to P-1, Institutional District and recommended the rezoning. Jim Akin, Highway 45 East, said he was not opposed to the rezoning of the future school site on Highway 45 East. He said they presently had it leased to someone and there were some cattle grazing on it. He said he was against the possibility of the school leasing it to someone and having a large number of cattle on the property. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones explained that where people owned undeveloped property and had run cattle and horses on- this before it came into the City, they could continue to do this. She said if they had not been run there when it was zoned R-1, then the change to P-1 would not allow it either. There was no other opposition. The public hearing was concluded. Mr. Power felt that what Mr. Akin was talking should be handled as a complaint and would be for Mr. Akin and the school to work out. Ernest Jacks moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of Rezoning Petition R75-36, City of Fayetteville. The motion, seconded by Jack Ray and Rita Davis was approved unanimously. ALAN BEAUCHAMP The next item was the large scale development plan and conditional Old Wire Road use request submitted by Alan Beauchamp to develop tennis courts and with a single-family residence on property lying North of Crossover Road Old Wire Road and West of Crossover Road (Highway 265). Property L. S. D. is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District. (This development plan would be seriously affected by the proposed extension of Elaine Street as shown on the proposed amendments to the Major Street Plan. The Board of Directors, after having this called to their attention, referred that part of the amendments to the Major Street Plan back to the Planning Commission for further study. That, and two other amendments to the Major Street Plan, which contained errors will be re -advertised for consideration January 27. Ernest Jacks gave the Subdivision Committee Report. He said 10 feet of additional right-of-way was needed along Old Wire Road and pointed out that this was needed before the Board of Directors would even consider it. He said part of the cul-de-sac was over a high pressure gas line, and that electric service was not shown. He said Mr. Beauchamp had not indicated what he would do about getting water to the property. • • Planning Commission -7- January 13, 1976 Mr. Beauchamp waspresent.and told the Planning Commission that the water was being worked .out and that he thought something could be worked out on the electric. - The public hearing was concluded. Peg Anderson expressed concern about the drop between Old Wire Road and Mr. Beauchamp's proposed road. Ernest Jacks moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of the large scale development plan of Alan Beauchamp on the basis that (1) the cul-de-sac be moved off the high pressure gas line. (2) that he show the water to the approval of the City Engineer and (3) he provide dedication of 10 foot of additional right-of-way on Old Wire Road Bill Kisor seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. Note. The conditional use. request was granted December 19, 1972 contingent upon Mr. Beauchamp bringing the Planning Commission a large scale development before developing the property. FARM SERVICE CO-OP Next was the large scale development plan and conditional 1332 Beechwood Avenue use request submitted by Farm Service Co-op to construct L. S. D. a garden and nursery center East of Beechwood Avenue, West of Razorback Road (extended), and North of 15th Street (Highway 16 By -Pass). Property is zoned I-1, Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial. Although this immediate plan covers only the garden and nursery center, it is the tentative plan of Farm Service Co-op to eventually relocate its operation at Highway 71.and Highway 62 on this 37.79 acre tract. Further development plans will be submitted as the future phases of this development materialize. Ernest Jacks gave the Subdivision Committee Report revealing that a 20 foot easement is required along Beechwood Avenue and 40 foot of right-of-way from the centerline of Razorback. He said a 50 foot utility easement was being asked for along Razorback in addition to the 40 feet of right-of-way from the centerline, reason being that Razorback probably will become part of the State Highway System and utilities cannot be located in State Highway right-of-way. Mr. Jacks pointed out that these were required by ordinance before consideration by the Board of Directors. Jim Dickson and Wayne Ball were present to represent. Mr. Dickson said Farm Service Co-op did not object to the easements but did contest dedication for additional right-of-way for Razorback at this time. He explained that the entire Co-op operation would eventually be located here but that it would be approximately 10- 15 years from now. He said they presently did not have the means to pave that part of Razorback, but that they would dedicate the right-of-way when they eventually get their loan from the main office to move the entire operation to that location,if it had not already been paved by someone else at that time. He said if they posted a bond for Razorback, it would mean the Co-op would be promising to pave it and they could not do so at this time. Planning Consultant Larry Wood suggested that the Planning Commission could recommend the Board of Directors to defer the dedication of additional right-of-way on Razorback since they would have to bring another large scale development plan in at a later time. Ernest Jacks moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of the large scale development plan with the following contingencies: (1) 20 foot easement be provided along Beechwood Avenue (West side of the property) (2) that a 50 foot wide easement be provided along what would be Razorback beginning on the East side at a point 40 feet from the centerline of Razorback extended.(3)Recommend to the Board of Directors that the dedication of.40 ft. of right -of -:way from the centerline of RazoxbackyRoad, be deferred at thistime:.Mr.-Newhouse seconded the motion which was approved .unanimously Ernest Jacks moveo approve the conditional use request; Peg Anderson seconded the motion which was approved unanimously, Planning Commission -9- January 13, 1976 OTHER BUSINESS It was suggested that (beginning in March) the day and time of the Planning Commission meetings be changed to 5:00 P. M. the second and fourth Mondays of each month. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones said this would involve an amendment to the Planning Commission By-laws. She said they could be amended or repealed by an affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the full membership of the Planning Commission but that the amendments should be presented first -in writing at a regular meeting and placed on the agenda of the subsequent regular meeting for action unless 10 days written notice of the proposal has been given to all Commissioners, in which case action may be taken by any regular or called meeting. Or, an amendment may be made by unanimous vote without notice. Since two of the Commissioners were absent, Bobbie Jones said she could get the notice in the mail to be voted on at the next meeting. Also under "Other Business" with the consent of the Commissioners, Vice -Chairman Power appointed a nominating committee consisting of Bill Kisor, Rita Davis, and Jack Ray to make nominations for the positions of Chairman, Vice -Chairman, and Secretary of the Planning Commission. This matter will be voted upon at the first meeting in February. There was no further discussion. The meeting was adjourned at 6:28 P. M. Planning Commission -8- January 13, 1976 RALPH GOFF 555 West 15th Street Next was the large scale development plan submitted by L. S. D. Ralph Goff to construct office (s) on property at 555 West 15th Street. • Mr. Jacks said the Subdivision Committee recommended that the Planning Commission take no action on this item since the large scale development did not really show anything. No one was present to represent. Mr. Jacks then moved to reject the large scale development plan. He suggested that the Planning Administrator explain in her letter to Mr. Goff that everything seems okay but the Planning Commission could not really tell by the plan submitted to them. The motion was seconded by Peg Anderson and approved unanimously by a vote of 7-0. DR. J. B. HAYS North College Avenue The next item for consideration was a L. S. D. large scale development plan submitted by Dr. J. B. Hays to construct a retail sales outlet store between The Automotive and Western Sizzlin Steak House on North College Avenue. Mr. Jacks said the Subdivision Committee had found no problems except for controlling on-site drainage. Contractor John Box was present to represent. He told the Planning Commission that drainage was being taken to a catch basin on Highway 71. Peg Anderson expressed concern about the appearance and the eroding of the hillside behind the proposed site. Ernest Jacks moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the approval of the large scale development of Dr. Hays contingent on the drainage not running into Highway 71. The motion, seconded by Jack Ray, was approved by a vote of 6-0-1 with Mrs. Anderson abstaining. The last item on the agenda was the proposed amendment L..S. D. ORDINANCE to the Large Scale Development Ordinance (Article IV, - Proposed Amendment Section I, Appendix C. Subdivision Regulations, Fayetteville Code of Ordinances, (Ordinance 1750 as amended by Ordinances 1998, 2016, 2044, 2073) to simplify the procedure for approving a large scale development Plan, and for other purposes, tabled December 9, 1975. It was brought out in a letter from the City Attorney (which was attached to the proposed ordinance) that Planning Consultant Larry Wood had pointed out that neither the existing ordinance nor the proposed amendment required the developer to construct any public improvements. The ordinance merely requiresthe developer to dedicate street right-of-way and utility easements under certain circumstances. Mr. Wood had suggested that the ordinance be amended to require the developer to install public. improvements necessitated by his development. Mr. Wood said he thought that the City Attorney was going to include this in the proposed ordinance. Peg Anderson felt that a commercial ad in the newspaper concerning the Subdivision Committee meeting would not be noticed as much as. it would in the legal notices. Administrative Assistant David McWethy suggested that they forget the display and merely have the alternative that the developer get the signatures of the adjoining property owners on the plans or send registered letters. Mr. Power felt that the Planning Commission should talk with Jim Lindsey and Ervan Wimberly (participants in the "task force" study) before actually taking any action on the proposed ordinance. After further discussion, Jack Ray moved to table this item until the January 27 meeting. Ernest Jacks suggested that Larry Wood contact City Attorney Jim McCord to resolve what Mr. McCord had mentioned in his letter and that the Planning Administrator notify Jim Lindsey and Ervan Wimberly and request they attend the January 27th meeting. There was no second to the motion and no vote taken, but by general concensus the other Planning Commission members agreed with the motion. Planning Commission -9- January 13, 1976 OTHER BUSINESS It was suggested that (beginning in March) the day and time of the Planning Commission meetings be changed to 5:00 P. M. the second and fourth. Mondays of each month. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones said this would involve an amendment to the Planning Commission By-laws. She said they could be amended or repealed by an affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the full membership of the Planning Commission but that the amendments should be presented first -in writing at a regular meeting and placed on the agenda of the subsequent regular meeting for action unless 10 days written notice of the proposal has been given to all Commissioners, in which case action may be taken by any regular or called meeting. Or, an amendment may be made by unanimous vote without notice. Since two of the Commissioners were absent, Bobbie Jones said she could get the notice in the mail to be voted on at the next meeting. Also under "Other Business" with the consent of the Commissioners, Vice -Chairman Power appointed a nominating committee consisting of Bill Kisor, Rita Davis, and Jack Ray to make nominations for the positions of Chairman, Vice -Chairman, and Secretary of the Planning Commission. This matter will be voted upon at the first meeting in February. There was no further discussion. The meeting was adjourned at 6:28 P. M. RESOLUTION PC 1-76 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Planning Commission, Tuesday, November 11, 1975, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected on the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted on Tuesday, January 13, 1976, to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the petition of Mr. H. L. Mathias, R75-26 for rezoning;; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVITT.F, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the petition requesting the rezoning of property, described as follows, from R-0, Residential -Office District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial or C-3, Central Business Commercial District, be denied. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of Block Forty (40) in City of Fayetteville Beginning at a point which is three hundred fifty eight and one half (3582) feet south of the north east corner of said Block Forty and running thence south eighty six and one half (862) feet to north east corner of lot conveyed by H. M. Hudgins to H. M. Powers; thence west one hundred sixty two (162) feet eleven and one fourth (lley) inches; thence north eighty six and one half (862) feet, more or less, to a point due West of the beginning point; thence east one hundred sixty two (162) feet eleven and one fourth (11*) inches to the place of beginning. SECTION 2. That the rezoning of the above described real estate would not be presently desirable. PASSED AND APPROVED this day ofC`,x, v% , 1976. APPROVED: John Power, Vice Chairman • • • RESOLUTION PC 2-76 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Tuesday, January 13, 1976, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R75-32, Gordon R. Houston. Nod, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to R-2, Medium Density Resi- dential District, said real estate. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 7 & 8, Replat of Lots 11 through 16, University Acres Subdivision SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District, so that the petitioner may develope the property accordingly. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1976. APPROVED: John Power, Vice -Chairman • i • RESOLUTION PC 3-76 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Tuesday, January 13, 1976, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R75-33, Homer McBroom, Julia Jewel McBroom; Bulah Meredith; Lillian Hinkle; and Ken Lazenby, Realtor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVIIJF, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, said real estate. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SW4, NWy, Section 23, T -16-N, R -30-W, being more particu- larly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West right - of -way line of State Highway No. 16 which point is 660 feet South and 213 feet West of the NE corner of said 40 acre tract, and running, thence West 162 feet to a point which is 662 feet South of the North line of said 40 acre tract, thence North 662 feet to the North line of said 40 acre tract, thence East 327 feet to a point on the West right-of-way line of State Highway 16 which is 48 feet West of the NE corner of said 40 acre tract, thence in a Southerly direction bearing West along the West right-of-way line of State Highway 16 702.2 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, so that the petitioner may develope property accordingly. PASSED AND APPROVED this APPROVED: day of , 1976. John Power, Vice -Chairman r 0 • RESOLUTION PC 4-76 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Planning Commission, Tuesday, January 13, 1976, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected on the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the petition of Mrs. Robert (Nell) Brown, Flowers & Interior Accessories by Doyle, R75-34 for rezoning; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILJF, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the petition requesting the rezoning of property, described as follows, from R-0, Residential Office District, to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District, be denied. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Block 1, Public School Addition to Fayetteville, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Block 1, thence South 472 feet; thence West 1382 feet; thence North 472 feet; thence East 1382 feet to the point of beginning. =ION 2. That the rezoning of the above described real estate would not presently be desirable. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1976. APPROVED: John Power, Vice -Chairman RESOLUTION PC 5-76 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Tuesday, January 13, 1976, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R75-35, Leo P. Peel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District to R-2, Medium Density Residen- tial District, said real estate. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the SWI, NEI, and part of the SEk, NWt, Section 28, T -16-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point 110 65 feet East of the NW corner of the SWk, NEk, Section 28, T -16-N, R -30-W, thence South 22° 391 West 172.22 feet, thence South 22° 44' West 401.77 feet, thence East 118.67 feet, thence North 27° 441 29" East 598.27 feet, thence West 175.58 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.79 acres, more or less. SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District to R-2, Medium Density Residential District, so that the petitioner may develope property accordingly. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1976. APPROVED: John Power, Vice -Chairman RESOLUTION PC 6-76 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Tuesday, January 13, 1976, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R75-36, Ramay Junior High School, Future School Site, and Asbell Elementary School. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVITJF, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential District to P-1, Institutional District, said real estate. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract E: Ramay Junior High School, Fayetteville High School West Campus, etc., located West of Sang Avenue, South of Stone Street, and North of Old Farmington Road, more particularly described as follows: The SW*, SW4, Section 17, T -16-N, R -30-W, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, containing 40 acres, more or less. Tract F: Site for future school located East of Crossover Road (Highway 265) and North of Highway 45 (Mission Boulevard), more particularly described as follows: Part of the NW Fractional Quarter; Part of the NW4, SW4, part of the NE4, SW4, all in Section 1, T -16-N, R-30 W, more particularly described as follows, Beginning on the North line of the Right-of-way of Highway 45, at a point 854.3 feet South and 837.7 feet West of the SE corner of the frac- tional NW4 of Section 1, and running thence North 2,173 feet or to the Section and Township line; thence West with said line 1,130.3 feet to a point 667.26 feet East of the NW corner of Section 1; thence South 2,480.1 feet to a point on the North line of Right - of -way of Highway 45 which is 667.25 feet East and 155.5 feet North of the SW corner of the NWi, SW4, Section 1, thence Northeasterly with said Right-of-way line to the point of beginning, containing 60.3 acres, more or less. Tract G: Asbell Elementary School located North of Lawson Street, South of Washington Plaza Apartments, and on the East side of Sang Avenue and on the West side of Lewis Avenue, more particularly des- cribed as follows: The SA, NE4, NW4, Section 8, T -16-N, R -30-W, less and except 25 feet of equal and uniform width off the West end thereof, embraced in Sang Avenue. SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District to P-1, Institutional District so that the petitioner may develope property accordingly. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1976. APPROVED: John Power, Vice -Chairman , PLANNING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1976 •A +00 Z Keith Newhouse -rt-ii Vq •r4 A N N U fq N FA $4 p) .G 3 ^0a o 0j, CIO 7R as fi rC 9-1 -rl GO CO +3 p -r1 0 xo `JtQa g5 •, x January 13 X X X X X X X January 27 X X X X X X X X X February 10 X X X X X X X X X February 24 X X X X X X X X March 15 X X X X X X X X X March 29 X X X X X X X April 12 X X X X X X X X April 26 X X X X X X X X X May 10 X X X X X X X X June __--_ - June— — 28- July 12 14 X X X X X X X — X-- —X— X X _X X X X X X X X -- X X X July 26 X X X X X X X ____ August_ 9 X X X X X X X X __. _August. _23 X X X X X X X X X Sep_tember 13 X X X X X X X September 27 X X i11 X X X X X X October 11 X X _X X X November_8, x X X X X X X X X X X— X X X November 22 X X X December 13 X X X X X X X COMMITTEE MEMBERS of Fayetteville's Boards, Committees, and Commissions Members' Names Address Telephone No, Term Expires: Date Appointed: Airport Study Committee Board of Adjustment Board of Directors Board of Construction Appeal City Hospital Board of Trustees Civil Service Commission Community Appearance Committee •Community Development Committee Charles Oxford W. E. Sohl Ray Ellis Carl Yates, Ch. Janes 11. White Suzanne C. Lighton David Newbern Connie Clack Ernest Lancaster John Todd Paul R. Noland C.A. "Al" llughes Marion R. Orton, Ch. Russell T. Purdy Morris li. Collier Bryce Davis, Ch. Neal Albright Miller Ford J. Palmer Boggs Kenneth Ball Alsey Holland, Ch. Joe B. Hall Mrs. 11. J. Meenan John Lewis Ed Connell Marion Crider Barry Vandergriff Dr. Ruth Lesh G. C. Thomas Gerald Jones Hugh Brewer Bill Underwood Gene Thrasher Charles Carnes Floyd Carl, Jr. Steve Brown, Ch. Stan Brown Victor Watts Doris Milton John Marinoni Bianca Delille Lucile Malone Betty Smith Tom McHale L.M. McGoodwin Pat Watkins Beverly Melton Mona Donahue Virginia Ricks Paul D. Lewis Lynn Wade Sylvia Swartz Billy Carroll Joe McFerran Christine Bailey Dorothy Seaton Frank Sharp • Ilarold Johnson George Gray Lester W. Bale Lewis Chesser Mollie K. Wilson Alice Ludwick 1024 Eastwood Drive 1355 last Ridgeway 1500 iiotz Drive 1400 Eastwood Drive 2770 Elizabeth Avenue 424 N. Willow 734 N. Willow 725 Dogwood Lane 300 West Fifteenth Street 2381 Winwood Drive 2190 Manor Drive 965 Hall 1641 Ilalsell Road 868 Skyline Drive 6300 Huntsville Road 1120 Oak Manor Drive 2880 Centerwood Road 859 Peel Street 1 Texas Way 2100 N. Leverett 549 East Prospect 5 Mt. Nord Street 1401 Vista Drive 1463 Woodbrook Drive 1845 East Fourth Street Greenland, Arkansas 940 Sunset Drive 356 North Washington 4 Ranch Drive 200 Holly Street 1544 Columbus 1727 Rockwood Trail 545 East North Street 741 North Lewis 325 Louise 2575 West Sixth Street 1393 Mally Wagnon Road 1619 West Maple Street 2233 Elaine 1370 Harold Street 637 North Leverett 1121 East Ridgeway 1016 Wood Avenue . 621 North Razorback 1146 North Mission 1417 Elmwood Drive 927 Applebury Drive 1445 Viewpoint 105 North Willow 116 East Maple Street 1656 West Maple Street 607 North Razorback 1713 Maine Street 408 West North Street 3 West Elm Street 1701 West Center Street Smokehouse Trail Dowell Road 3420 Caty Lake Road 3637 Wellington Drive 1655 West Markham 692 Crescent Drive 107 Moreno 442-4259 442-4752 442-8964 442-4005 442-2029 442-6174 521-8374 442-8542 442-2714 521-4687 442-8820 443-3295 521-4984 442-4390 521-6331 442-8071 442-9127 443-3021 521-1752 521-4253 442-2494 442-5705 '442-6406 521-3609 442-2671 443-2738 442-4142 .442-2163 442-4197 442-4178 443-2263 442-8793 521-4622 521-5728 442-7622 442-8894 442-9044 442-5586 521-6261 442-8049 443-3053 521.-5021 442-5730 442-4019 442-9125 442-7514 442-6663 521-8777 521-2998 442-2633 521-5461 442-2416 521-4025 442-8525 443-5622 521-1901 267-3205 442-4309 443-3633 442-2954 442-8072 521-4079 442-8005 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1/1/80 1/1/78 1/1/76 1/1/79 1/1/77 12/31/78 12/31/78 12/31/78 12/31/78 12/31/76 12/31/76 12/31/76 /1/77 /1/79 /1/80 /1/76 /1/78 /1/78 /1/76 /1/78 /1/78 ndefinite ndefinite ndefinite • ndefinite ndefinite ndefinite /1/81 /1/78 /1/76 /1/80 /1/77 /1/78 /1/76 /1/76 /1/76 /1/76 /1/76 /1/76 /1/76 /1/78 0/1/75 0/1/75 0/1/77 0/1/76 0/1/76 0/1/76 0/1/75 0/1/77 0/1/75 0/1/77 0/1/77 0/1/77 0/1/76 0/1/76 0/1/75 0/1/77 0/1/75 0/1/77 0/1/77 2/18/75 3/18/75 • Electricians Licensing Board Firemens' Relief and Pension Fund Board Housing Appeal Board [lousing Assistance Plan Committee (Fayetteville) Housing Authority Industrial Park Committee (Roberta Fulbright Memorial) Library Board of Trustees Cecil England Everett W. Coonfield G. F. Patrick (Alt. bl) Rodney Greer (Alt. n2) Donald L. Grimes Darlene Westbrook Pat Tobin Charlie McWhorter Donald Miller Ronald McArthur James Ilarris Iloward Boudrey J. E. McClelland Ronnie Bumpass Chester !louse Lois Fry, Ch. Mark Doyle Claud I'rewitt Anita Whitlock Hazel Buchanan James Vizzicr Stanley Potts Lydia Hancock Ruby Bottoms Pearl Blye 8111 Gould, Ch. Bill Underwood Sherman Morgan Roy Clinton Phil Taylor Joe Fred Starr Don Trumbo Kenneth Cotterman James Jefferson • Larry Belzung R. Dale Christy E. Leighton Rudolph, Ch. Dottie Wood Narnee Murphy George E. Shelton Woodson Bassett Donald L. Grimes Herbert Lewis, Jr. Licensing Board for Dance Halls Claiborne Bell Jack Wallace LeMon Clark Municipal Parking Authority Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Manning Commission C. Garland Melton, Jr., Ch. Curtis Shipley Marcus Walden James Gibson W. C. Morton, Jr. George Holland, Ch. Barbara Broyles Romcy Thomason Ben Winborn Rodney Ryan David Lashley Jerry Marshall Elizabeth Reagan Morton Gitelman, Ch. Ernest Jacks Helen Edmiston Rita Davis. John Maguire Donald Nickell John Power Jack Ray 8111 }Clear 904 North Garland Street 507 Huntsville Road 122 W. Meadow 2017 Green Acres Road 442-4397 521-2488 442-6334 521-7684 1580 Woodbrook Drive 521-7106 517 Happy Ilollow Road ' 442-6156 1097 East Ridgeway 443-2686 1234 South Duncan 442-4659 1210 Lake Sequoyah Drive 442-4L70 1952 Juneway Terrace 443-5784 Wyman Road 442-8478 662 Lake Sequoyah Drive' 442-9464 1206 North Vandcventer 442-8563 790 Longview 521-1326 1881 Brent Lane 442-8758 1508 Wedington Drive 668 Gray Avenue 915 Lawson 16 West Poplar Street 127 Willow Avenue 2185 Smokehouse Road Morningside Drive 1 North School Avenue 1928 Custer Lane 120 North Washington 1200 West Ridgeway 1727 Rockwood Trail 610 South Willow 2 Lovers Lane 1409 Oak Manor Drive 492-5047 443-3097 521-5598 521-1198 443-3013 267-3506 443-2206 442-8724 521-1469 942-4308 442-6015 442-8793 442-5737 442-6455 442-8935 Fred Starr Road - 442-6515 902 Eastwood Drive 442-9963 721 Winbaugh Drive 521-2872 1866 South Custer Lane 492-2782 1515 Clark Street 521-3036 1403 Meadowcliff 521-4020 513 Highland 1045 Oak Manor Drive 1230 Crestwood Drive 400 Williams Drive 2210 Manor Drive 1580 Woodbrook 327 North Washington 790 Elm Street 1327 South Duncan 1500 Clark 927 Applebury Drive 1132 East Ridgeway 1305 Crossover Road 1919 Wheeler Avenue 805 Sunset Drive 884 Shrewsbury 1525 Hope Street 2650 Loxley 2332 Winwood Drive 2317 Juneway Terrace 1418 Elmwood Drive 1245 Crestwood 241 East Thirteenth 1229 West Lakeridge 310 Williams Drive 1419 Woolsey 1106 Shadowridge 2202 South Canterbury 817 Ovcrcrest 1056 Bonnie Lane 1495 Zion Road 2715 Sheryl 943-2694 443-3574 442-6726 521-5917 492-6666 521-7106 521-8635 443-5156 521-7992 521-7657 442-6663 443-3672 942-8359 442-9405 492-7606 521-2212 442-4244 521-6412 521-6672 442-7009 442-5656 442-8818 492-4404 521-1568 442-8453 442-4516 442-8790 442-6710 442-6459 521-4789 521-4831 521-2634 5/1/77 5/1/77 5/1/77 5/1/77 Indefinite Indefinite Indefini In Indefi nice 5/1/76 5/1/76 5/1/77 5/1/77 3/1/76 3/1/78 3/1/77 0/1/77 0/1/75 0/1/77 0/1/77 0/1/77 0/1/76 0/1/76 0/1/75 0/1/75 0/1/76 /1/79 /1/76 /1/78 /1/77 /1/80 /1/77 /1/77 /1/78 /1/78 /1/78 ndefinite /1/76 /1/80 /1/76 /1/76 /1/80 definite definite definite definite definite /5/79 /5/78 /5/76 /5/80 /5/77 /1/76 /1/77 /1/76 /1/76 /1/77 /1/77 /1/76 /1/77 /1/76 /1/76 /1/76 /1/80 /1/78 /1/78 /1/80 /1/78 /1/80 5/20/75 5/20/75 5/20/75 5/20/75 3/18/75 3/18/75 Plumbers Licensing Board Pollcemens' Pension Fund Board Pollution Control Committee I larold 0, Johnson Earnest Shackelford J. C. Cole Donald L. Grimes Pat Tobin Glen Biggins Dan Epperley Coy Kaylor James Kimzey, Ch. W, E. Sohl Richard Meyer Lyell Thompson Carl Osborn Shelley Cooper Jim Dickson Lester liowick Lois Imhoff Ruth Rich John Page • Dowell (load 1420 South West Avenue Zion Road 1580 Woodbrook 1097 East Ridgeway 1035 South Washington Mount Comfort Road 1651 Rockwood Trail 1665 Carolyn DrLve 1355 East Ridgeway Highway 45 East 412 Ila 1216 Stephens 7 Court Street 340 Highland 1624 Carolyn Drive 224 West Cleburn 215 East Center 1500 Elmwood Drive 442-4309 442-8924 442-4165 521-7106 443-2686 443-3266 942-7430 442-8764 521-4415 442-4752 521-4147 442-9215 442-9320 521-9951 521-3869 442-8787 442-9948 442-2605 443-2435 5/1/77 5/1/77 5/1/77 Indefinite Indefinite indefinite Indcfinitc Indefinite 1/1/78 1/1/77 1/1/76 1/1/76 1/1/76 1/1/78 1/1/78 1/1/76 1/1/76 1/1/77 1/1/78 5/20/75 5/20/75 5/20/75 i•• rdrl•i•i••� •..antira 13, i c -Me Po_a-✓ Rai - ✓ Peq-?(e ✓ Pejo-7(0 ✓ ELI] r/c9 / Pe la- 7(o ✓ ‘9 , a4, fl• l �.J R7s-aGI ce:-.,-: J ticri s R'1s-3AcrytA (rc 6 t9 _., ,:Jefit, -- _R:757733_ ark`, _vc _ 75.3 s'cttk a ,024R_ 5.36 '» L._CA.114.04.(okcJeLL:7„,444 04,s4 Si9-tettri Gl_RYb7.1 erk. cP (o- or( (La. 4,1alykah_idiclietatizas) Pe -i3 -2(p vetak tanixt.,t PUA _ Pe aa- e7ci o °(��a�� �te 6 y0 Pe, 4 -"Hp✓ exi S ..a R94-3 4- Pc, lc IceZ. 'l(0- P0_I(9-ee-R'7G-5- Pc 11- 76 ✓ niaast, inG-(Qaost of ••••••••••-••••f••••••• •• •••• i Pc.g-ece✓ wafeta 716-7 rck. P ao c✓_ - R1(0-9 PQ -011 -Yr/ (Seiteel atiorzyc.,2_, (�l94LA. - y/.t1t.a3 y. ZI _Pc a5=��✓c�r„� �-�.�.`` (��-�%s: 1� •••••••••dir,••• •i•T ��� 5�� 21 ✓ X S 7‘,--.1-c) • /3 Pe. ,°a etc ,owe Pe /926 amc2ice(¢ d S7 06 ✓ ,(/.,C/ acid/€.7(42) e76 -a9 °'3o.-/ 58- X ✓ 4.s . 4 X- c3a d nrt - G_i-76 02 oVe.e, £ d to of Pe 607- % ✓ OS teLa4 o. , . Pita -24 �yae uecR %1y ?� , — Pc Co3- V PC CEO& &, J Ceztge2 7/,_ PPC los - ZG1/4/ L _ -R76-342. Peia -2(a ??6- 3 s. —Riar 76 Lad zeg LA -41 -cu. 8, /976 Pc- (08-i4,* __Pc. 69-7_61/ Pc. eh) -26 Fc. fl -1(0 P C '! -%(off o. oso_. u:6,.Q �-c J u_awu r 1 mace 0 �-LA As eau,) e7 -06 _a2 R 94 -0_0_7_ -dere oho. - c -P ?, - o u._ /' a,Pic-P JZJWYKAW9-r `A -4-d aa, i 976 Pe 2.3-26 ski••••• • ,:►•••••••••••••••• 4e iS, i92 Pe -z//2 -3i - a /i ni-_ 7i /owl _2a �n. s L -,-• .1 ,. _ /J r c /a - ir." y .c.- ✓ 1 (0 -=L/ /r -arc -'-c. i ocic.44..cxcx-. IAC 76 - 76 124d1 174 7-- a/170.