Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-09-11 MinutesMINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING The Fayetteville Planning Commission met at 4:00 P.M., Tuesday, September 11, 1973, in the Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Marvin Murphy, Donald Nickell, John Maguire, Ernest Jacks, Helen Edmiston, Roy Clinton, Christine Childress, Morton Gitelman. Al Hughes. Larry Wood, F. H. Martin, Joe Steele, Tom Burke, J.W. Gable, Raymond Harrel Richard Hipp, Ervan Wimberly, Chase Reid, Rene Diaz, Joe Segers, Russell Purdy, David McWethy. Chairman Roy Clinton called the meeting to order. The first item scheduled on the agenda was a public hearing on Rezoning PETITION R73-30 Petition R73-30, Associated Produce, Inc., to rezone property located ASSOCIATED PRODUCE on the East side of North College Avenue (Highway 71 North) and North N. College of Zion Road, from A-1, Agricultural District, and C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District for the entire parcel. Chairman Clinton announced that a letter had been received from Sidney P. Davis, Jr., Attorney for the petitioner, requesting permission to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to re -file a petition to rezone all or part of the subject property within one year. Chairman Clinton asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak in support of or in opposition to the petition. There was no:response. Ernest Jacks moved to permit the petition to be withdrawn without prejudice and to allow the petitioner to refile at a later date. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. Chairman Clinton opened the public hearing on Rezoning Petition R73-31, PETITION R73-31 Steele Investment Company, to rezone property located on the South side STEELE INV. CO. of Highway 71 By-pass and on the West side of North College Avenue N.College & By-pass (Highway 71 North), from A-1, Agricultural District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District. Larry Wood presented the Planning Report. Morton Gitelman arrived at 4:10 P.M. F. H. Martin, Attorney, and Joe Steele were present to represent Petition R73-31. Mr. Martin said that the Steele Investment Company had acquired the property about 1961 and that it had been used for farming purposes since that time until it was split by the By-pass. It had been irrigated from a pond on the North side of the By-pass. Mr. Martin said he felt the proper use of the property is commercial and that this is a highly desirable commercial area now with the other development out there. With our limited C-2 in commercial areas, values have gone high. All the adjacent property owners have signed for their approval of the rezoning with the exception of Harvey Smith and Mr. Martin said he thought they just had not gotten around to contacting him. The access road has been laid out to intersect with Millsap Road because they were told this was where the planners felt it should go. He said Mr. Steele was willing to bring the service road on down to his South property line. Mr. Steele was granted two points of access to the By-pass by the Arkansas Highway Department. Mr. Steele pointed out the two access points and said he had a letter from the Arkansas Highway Department stating that if the By-pass ever became 4 lanes wide, they would allow a cut in the median so he could cross. Mr. Martin said he believed it would be easier for traffic leaving this property and going North to exit directly onto the By-pass East of its intersection with 71-B. Planning Commission -2- 9-11-73 Marvin Murphy asked for specifics on what is permitted in the R-2 District. Chairman Clinton told him it allows mostly apartments with up to 24 units per acre. • Marvin Murphy moved to approve Petition R73-31, Steele Investment Company, as presented. Donald Nickell asked Larry Wood if he felt the traffic volumn would be greater with C-2 zoning as opposed to R-2. Mr. Wood said he did and would hope in the total design of this area that if this were commercial, filtering of traffic through this area from the residential area to the South would not be encouraged. If, however, it were zoned residential, he would hope it would filter through. Mr. Wood said that on the By-pass plan the access road on the South side did not go all the way to Johnson Road. It turns South and hits Appleby Road, then Appleby Road intersects with Johnson Road. Ernest Jacks asked if the access road would turn South on this property. Mr. Wood said it would turn South West of this property. Ernest Jacks said this seemed like a lot of commercial property and he thought Mr. Wood's recommendations better. Mr. Wood pointed out on the drawing of the Steele property what portion he had recommended for C-2. Chairman Clinton stated that in looking at the map, it seems all we have out there is C-2. There will probably be a (traffic) light located at the entrance to the Ramada Inn; there will not be one at the entrance to Northwest Arkansas Plaza, only warning lights. Whether or not the necessity of a light at Millsap Road will someday be a reality, he could not say. The proposed bank will be across College Avenue at Millsap Road. The situtation with the access road and the access North and East is not a particular problem at this time. The biggest problem is coming out of the East part of the property and turning back to the North for which there is no solution at this time. Mr. Clinton said a light would be a solution of sorts, but access is going to be the key. He thought they could all look at the situation now and say that nothing has worked. The City, Highway Department, and the developers have all agreed that nothing has worked out there yet. Mr. Clinton said that • personally he had no qualms about zoning all the property C-2. Morton Gitelman said that he did have qualms. Marvin Murphy said that is all commercial out there and it is going to stay that way or get more so and it looks like it would be better to go on and zone it C-2 rather than try to work out the engineering this afternoon on any future problem. Larry Wood recommended that the petitioner extend the service road to his South property line and work with Mr. Jim Lindsey in terms of getting some relief on the access problem. Mr. Steele said he thought the access road should go on to his South property line. John Maguire seconded the motion made by Marvin Murphy to approve the rezoning petition to rezone all 45 acres C-2. He said the Commission would be looking at anything that is done out there anyway. Morton Gitelman said he liked Mr. Wood's recommendation better. He thought 45 acres, considering some requests we have out there, goes too far, especially with 2 access points. One thing the Commission has been trying to avoid was to encourage any commercial stripping along the By-pass and it seems this would generate other petitions to rezone A-1 property on the other side of the By-pass and up to Johnson Road. John Maguire questioned whether the Commission can avoid the pressure along the By-pass for rezoning for large motel sites and such that require 10 acre or so sites. He thought there will be requests for retail service establishments out there, too. Morton Gitelman said that 45 acres is a lot of C-2. We have a lot of C-2 out there now that is undeveloped. John Maguire said that in interstate systems, you observe 8 or 10 miles of nothing but motels. Ernest Jacks asked Mr. Maguire if he was making a case for (commercial) stripping of the By-pass. Mr. Maguire said he thought this is what the land owners will want. The vote was taken on the motion to approve the petition. Maguire, Murphy, and • Clinton voted "Aye"; Childress, Nickell, Gitelman, Jacks, and Edmiston voted "Nay." The motion to approve the petition failed to pass. Planning Commission -3- 9-11-73 Chairman Clinton asked the Commission whether it desired to consider taking action on the recommendation of Larry Wood to rezone the Eastern portion of • the property C-2 with the depth continuing in a straight North-South line with the C-2 property to the South, and the balance of the property R-2. He also asked Mr. Steele whether he would like to have them consider this recommendation. Mr. Steele asked if he would have to wait a year to come back before the Commission. He was told he had the right to appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the Board of Directors. He said he had a man wanting to buy the western point of the land for an implement sales and service. He had no plans to change the land on the North side of the By-pass which he owns at this time. He said he felt an injustice had been done him; the land looks like a perfect commercial plot of land to him. Chairman Clinton said the Commission has disapproved rezoning the 45 acres to C-2, but they could place the recommendation of Larry Wood on the agenda for the next meeting. Morton Gitelman moved to table the recommendation of Larry Wood on Rezoning Petition R73-31, Steele Investment Company, to rezone a portion of the property C-2 and the balance R-2. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. • • Chairman Clinton opened the public hearing on Rezoning Petition R73-32, PETITION R73-32 James B. & Margaret A. Blair, to rezone property located East of North JAMES B. BLAIR College Avenue (Highway 71 North) and North of Zion Road. Tract I is N. College requested to be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District. Tract II is requested to be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-0, Residential Office District. Larry Wood presented the Planning Report. Attorney Tom Burke and J. W. Gable were present to represent the petition. Mr. Burke said there is a lot of C-2 property out there and that they would not have an access problem. Access into the property would come off Zion Road. He said the Elks Club had given them access across their property to serve the C-2. The R-0 requested would serve as a buffer between the C-2 and the property to the East. He said it would not be unreasonable to zone the front portion C-2 and the Eastern portion R -O. Ernest Jacks asked if they have any access off Highway 71. Donald Nickell said there is a high bluff along there. Larry Wood asked Mr. Burke if the applicant did not have a driveway which goes to his house up next to Clear Creek. They do. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones said this section of the Highway is designated "controlled access" which calls for a service road. Morton Gitelman asked if the access from the Elks Club was to be a road paralleling Highway 71 North from the Zion Road. Mr. Burke said the Elks Club will grant an easement in to provide commercial access. Chairman Clinton said that the area requested for C-2 should not have to have its access through the area requested for R-0 off Zion Road. There was no opposition present. Ernest Jacks moved to approve Petition R73-32, James B. & Margaret A. Blair, as presented. Morton Gitelman seconded the motion. Chairman Clinton said that the Commission would look with disfavor on Mr. Blair using the northern access point just South of Clear Creek which leads into his house as access to get into the commercial area. The motion to approve Petition R73-32 was approved unanimously. A large scale development plan and conditional use request had been submitted by Trinity Temple, 1100 Rolling Hills Drive. This also included a request TRINITY TEMPLE for Planning Commission approval of off-site parking. The matter had been continued from July 24, 1973, so that the Church could furnish the Planning Office information on the floor area of the auditorium so the parking requirements could be computed. Also, some type of agreement should be submitted on the off-site parking. Planning Commission -4- 9-11-73 Ernest Jacks reported that the Subdivision Committee had reviewed the information on the proposal. There is a problem with the setback of 5 parking spaces from Rolling Hills Drive. Otherwise everything appears to be fine. The Planning Commission need to approve off-site parking. They have submitted letters to provide plenty of off-site parking. Ernest Jacks moved to approve the large scale development plan and conditional use request of Trinity Temple with the exception of the setback of the one parking lot being brought into conformance with the zoning ordinance and also moved to approve the off-site parking for Trinity Temple to use the K -Mart parking lot according to the agreement contained in the letters submitted. Helen Edmiston seconded the combined motion which was approved unanimously. James E. Holder had submitted a large scale development plan for property JAMES HOLDER on North College Avenue between Wheeler Motor Company and Gibson's-Wyattts, OTASCO for a proposed OTASCO store. Attorney Richard Hipp and Raymond Marre were N. College present to represent the proposal. L.S.Development Ernest Jacks reported for the Subdivision Committee. The property owner went to the Board of Adjustment, which denied a request for a variance from the 20 ft. setback from the property to the East. The City Engineer has asked for certain sewer easements. The power, telephone, and gas companies have asked for easements which Mr. Jacks understood the developer would be willing to furnish. The big problem concerns Lee Avenue. The City Street Superintendent has asked that Lee Avenue be improved or barricaded and not used for any access. Lee Avenue comes through residentially zoned property, but it is presently being used for access to the commercial property North of this site. Mr. Jacks asked Mr. Hipp and Ns. Marre if they had any questions about the setbacks or easements requested. They did not. Mr. Hipp said that Lots 1, 2, and 3, Maple Crest Additon abut Lee Avenue, are zoned residentially, and are owned by Mr. Holder, but are not part of this development plan. • Chairman Clinton said that he felt that if the Street Department wants to go out and barricade Lee Avenue, they have the right to do so. He stated that under no circum- stances would the Commission ever approve any access back through those three lots to Lee Avenue. Ernest Jacks moved to approve the large scale development plan of James Holder with 3 provisions: (1) That the setback on the East side be increased to that required by the zoning ordinance; (2) That the easements required by the City and the utility companies be furnished. Some of these easements will have to come across those three residentially zoned lots to the East. (3) That there be no access across those three residentially zoned lots to the East. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion. Morton Gitelman asked if the Subdivision Committee had discussed the signs. Mr. Jacks said the Committee had discussed the signs, but that Bobbie Jones said they would be willing to comply with the sign regulations. Mr. Jacks said the Commission would not be approving any sign. The motion as voiced by Mr. Jacks was approved unanimously. The proposed Final Plat of Winwood II Subdivision, Phase I, being developed by Fayetteville Land Company, Mildred Winborn, President, was presented for WINWOOD II SUBD. approval. Ervan Wimberly and Chase Reid, both with McClelland Engineers, FINAL PLAT, PHASE I were present to represent the proposed plat. Ernest Jacks reported that the Subdivision Committee had reviewed the plat. Access with Winwood Drive needs to be shown. A contract needs to be entered into between the developer and the City to insure the completion of the improvements. A sidewalk needs to be shown on one side of Susan. There was a suggestion that the names Elmwood Drive and Elmwood Lane be changed because of the confusion. Mr. Jacks suggested that the developer of this subdivision get together with the developer of Elmwood Subdivision and have the City change the name of the North-South section of Elmwood Drive because the section on this plat shown as Elmwood Lane does just extend the East-West portion of Elmwood Drive. Planning Commission -5- 9-11-73 Mr. Jacks moved that the Commission approve the Final Plat of Winwood II, Phase I, with these three provisions: (1) Access with Winwood Drive be shown • on the plat; (2) A Subdivider's Contract between the developer and the City be entered into to insure the installation of the required improvements; and (3) Sidewalk be shown on Susan Drive. Street names are to be worked out. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. A large scale development plan had been submitted by Sam Taylor to construct SAM TAYLOR a single family dwelling on property on Stone Bridge Road. No one was present Stone Bridge to represent Mr. Taylor. Road Ernest Jacks reported the Subdivision Committee had looked at the plan. L.S.Development The only problem is on street right-of-way. Chairman Clinton said that there is a road there as shown with a private drive across the North end of Stone Bridge Road which leads to the Rushing property. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones said that the City Plat Book does not show any street right-of-way on this. The drawing mailed to the Commission on this was prepared from the maps which Jim Vizzier had prepared for the City and were based on aerial photographs. Helen Edmiston said the street would have to be dedicated and improved. Chairman Clinton did not agree. He said he did not think the City would have a case in which Mr. Taylor could not show that this was a street in use when it was annexed into the City. As far as Mr. Taylor is concerned, it is a street by right of the use of the people in the area. John Maguire asked if a survey would not indicate where his property lines are and the adjoining property owner's lines are with relation to the street. Chairman Clinton said it would, but Mr. Taylor did not want to have his land surveyed just to find out where the street is. Both Chairman Clinton and John Maguire testified to having personally used this section of street for many years. Chairman Clinton said that if his house is far enough off the road, then Mr. Taylor has no problem except he may lose some trees or something in the future. The City will assume • the road is a public street if he wants to build a single house. If he wants to build another house, then we need right-of-way dedicated. Every case is an individual case. Christine Childress asked if this property has been annexed into the City and they have been using it as a street or a road, would it be necessary for them to dedicate it as a road and improve it? Morton Gitelman said that if that road has been there all that time, then the public has an easement there whether it is dedicated or not. Mrs. Childress asked if the Commission could approve this without knowing who the street belongs to. Mr. Gitelman said he thought it could because this is not a subdivision. If it were a subdivision he would have to give right-of-way. Christine Childress moved to approve the large scale development plan of Sam Taylor with the inclusion of a power easement as requested Helen Edmiston seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. A large scale development plan had been submitted by Rene Diaz to construct RENE DIAZ a single family dwelling on property on Halsell Road. Mr. Diaz was present. Ernest Jacks reported the Subdivision Committee had looked at the proposal. The Plat Review Committee wants him to give an additional 5 ft. of right-of-way. There are a number of people who live up and down Halsell Road with their houses so close to the street that they could not give an additional 5 ft. Planning Administrator Bobbie Jones said that Mr. Diaz had asked what the legal description for the 5 ft. the Plat Review Committee wants would be. Chairman Clinton suggested an agreement in which Mr. Diaz would agree to give the 5 ft. additional right-of-way at some future time when the City determines the legal description of that 5 ft. Bobbie Jones said that most of the legal descriptions she had platted out on Halsell Road run to the center of the street on the Plat Book. • Mr. Diaz said he had found out that it could cost him a survey and the legal fees to change the abstract and that to widen the street to 50 ft, would put the line in some people's living rooms He said he was in full agreement to deed over the amount Planning Commission -6- 9-11-73 needed when the City needs the right-of-way. The man who had asked him for the 5 ft. could not tell him where the 5 ft. would be in relation to his property line. He said he did not like to take on the cost of these legalities at this time. Chairman Clinton suggested an agreement that Mr. Diaz could sign in which he would agree to give the 25 ft. from the centerline of Halsell Road. Morton Gitelman said that would put the responsibility on the City to locate the centerline. Ernest Jacks moved to approve the large scale development plan of Rene Diaz on condition he would give additional property as needed to provide as much as 25 ft. right-of-way from the determined centerline of the street at the call of the City. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. A letter had been submitted by J. C. Terry, District Sales Manager, for INTERPRETATION Texaco, Inc. requesting an interpretation of the use units contained in OF USE UNITS the zoning ordinance. They desired to install additional tankage to Texaco, Inc. handle low lead fuel as a distributor from their bulk plant located at 1533 West 6th Street. This property is located in the I-1, Heavy Commercial & Light Industrial District. "Petroleum bulk station and terminal" is listed in the I-2, General Industrial District. "Fuel and ice establishments including fuel dealer and fuel oil" are listed in the I-1, Heavy Commercial & Light Industrial District. A representative of Texaco stated that since their bulk plant is located in the I-1 District, they could not install the additional storage tanks unless the Commission interpretated the storage of low lead fuels as being included in the "Fuel and ice establishments." There was a discussion. Helen Edmiston moved to interpret the wholesale storage of fuel and oil under Use Unit 21. Ernest Jacks seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. Joseph William Segers, Jr. had written a letter to the Commission appealing for permission to place a mobile home on an individual lot on Oakland APPEAL TO PLACE Avenue which is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential District. Mr. Segers MOBILE HOME ON was present. INDIVIDUAL LOT Helen Edmiston said the Commission just could not approve this. Ernest Jacks Joe Segers said he had looked at the regulations and did not see how the Commission could approve it. Mr. Segers said he was asking the Commission to make a determination because he knew what the ordinance says. The oft cursed mobile home needs a chord struck for it and he was doing it. There are mobile homes on Oakland in the area. The lot in question is 72 ft. by 72 ft. and the mobile home is 12 ft. wide and probably worth more in value than the homes presently located on North Oakland. All the homes are occupied by students who are renting them from somebody else. The area is zoned R-2 and is basically a student area. He felt the ordinance discriminates against people who want to live in the area in a mobile home. Mr. Segers said he did not see where a poor person who wants to live in a residential area and live in a mobile home. It doesn't matter what it is constructed out of. Mr. Segers agreed there was not much the Commission could do in this case without overriding an ordinance of the City. Donald Nickell asked Mr. Segers if he intended to make this his residence. Mr. Segers said that the person he was representing intended to make it his residence. Ernest Jacks asked Mr. Segers if he was asking the Commission to amend the zoning ordinance. Morton Gitelman reviewed for Mr. Segers the public hearings before the zoning ordinance was adopted. Originally the ordinance had been written to permit mobile homes on an individual lot in any residential zone of the City. There had been a lot of objections from the public, so the ordinance had been changed to permit them only in mobile home parks. Donald Nickell stated he felt trailer parks are the place for trailers. Mayor Purdy said that when the new mobile home park ordinance was passed and a single mobile home was made a temporary use under certain conditions in the A-1 district, it was a combined committee composed of the Planning Commission and Board of Directors • • • Planning Commission -7- 9-11-73 that drafted that ordinance. John Maguire said that if the Board of Directors wants the Commission to open it back up for a public hearing, the Commission is subservient to them. If a public hearing is held on the subject, he did not think you would have a meeting hall large enough to hold all the people and he thought Mr. Segers should be present to talk to them. Mr. Segers stated he assumed the Commission had unanimously denied his petition. He indicated he would pursue the matter further. Donald Nickell moved to deny the appeal to place a mobile home on an individual lot in the R-2 District. Christine Childress seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. Marvin Murphy left the meeting. Under "other business" Ervan Wimberly appeared before the Commission seeking CLOVER CREEK a waiver of certain requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. He was Waive Street preparing the final plat for Clover Creek and measuring from the center of Length street intersection to the end of the cul de sac, two of the streets exceed the maximum length for a dead end street. The two dead end streets cannot be extended without bridging a creek. Ernest Jacks moved that these particular streets be approved with the lengths shown on the plat submitted by Mr. Wimberly at this time. Morton Gitelman seconded the motion. Nickell, Maguire, Jacks, Clinton, Childress, and Gitelman voted "Aye." Edmiston abstained because of a conflict of interest. Larry Wood reported on his continuing study on the recommendations of the LAND USE PLAN Board Street Committee and Board of Directors for revisions to Land Use Hwy. 62 W. Plan for Highway 62 West between Highway 71 By-pass and the City Limits. This matter had been continued from July 24, 1973. Mr. Wood reported that his updated map showed the service roads as recommended by the Board Street Committee. The proposed land use changes recommended by the Board had all been made with the exception of the West side of One Mile Road and Finger Lane which the Planning Commission felt should be commercial. Morton Gitelman said that the plan looks much better than the shared access points originally discussed, whether we will ever see it is another question. It was noted that until the service road is a developed reality, temporary access points will have to be given to people building along Highway 62;;but that this should be done with the clear understanding that when the service road is put in, the temporary access points are to be closed. Helen Edmiston asked why it is better to have the service road along the front of the residential with the highway to its back. Why couldn't it stay along the highway and ben fenced off. Mr. Wood explained that it was placed away from the highway in the residential area to discourage funneling of commercial traffic through the residential areas. He said that he recognized the distance between some points is great and wanted to add a note to the plan that there is a possibility that the Commission will split the distance between certain roads and he also wanted to put street names on the drawing before taking it to the Board. Christine Childress moved that the Commission adopt this plan as presented by Mr. Wood. John Maguire seconded the motion which was approved unanimously. The study of the area bounded by Highway 71-B; Highway 16 By-pass and Highway 71 By-pass was continued again until September 25, 1973. The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 P.M. • RESOLUTION PC 29- 73 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held ber 11, 1973, fifteen (15) days after a a notice was published in the Northwest circulation; and by the Planning Commission, Tuesday, Septem- sign was erected upon the property and after Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general WHEREAS, after the public hearing the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on Rezoning Petition R73-32, Mr. and Mrs. James B. Blair. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVII.TF, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning from (Tract 1) A-1, Agricultural District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial Dist. (Tract 2) A-1, Agricultural District to R-0, Residential -Office District. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1 A part of the SE*, NE* and a part of the SW*, NE* of Section 23, T -17-N, R -30-W, described more particularly as follows: Beginning at the SW corner of the first mentioned 40 acre tract and running East 354.3 feet thence North 1° 55' West 578.4 feet to an existing rail fence and thence continuing along fence S 79°45' West 244.8 feet, thence S 730 25' West 179.4 feet, thence S 61° 55' West 210.8 feet to an existing fence, thence continuing along said fence to the South line of the said Northeast 4 des- cribed as S 4° 35' E 60.4 feet, thence S 7° 43' East 64.5 feet, thence S 3° 59' E 102.4 feet, thence S 70 37'E 181.7 feet, thence East 225.7 feet to the point of beginning, less existing highway right-of-way, leaving 6.73 acres, more or less. Tract 2 A part of the SE*, NE*, and a part of the Ni of the NE**, SE*, both being part of Section 23, T -17-N, R -30-W, being more particularly described as beginning at a stone located at the SW corner of the SE*, NE* of Section 23, T -17-N, R -30-W, and running thence North 40 feet and East 354.3 feet to the point of beginning. Thence N 10 44' W 580.4 feet, thence N 80° E 10.8 feet, thence N 73° 10' E 160.7 feet, thence N 66° 15' E 190.8 feet, thence N 66° 20' E 80.7 feet, thence N 73° 5' E 72.7 feet, thence N 75° 20' E 121.4 feet, thence N 68° 431 E 80.4 feet thence S 43° 53' E 444.99 feet, thence S 0°5' E 1128.4 feet, thence S 896 531 W 362.8 feet, thence North 630.8 feet, thence West 604.6 feet to the point of beginning, con- taining20.5 acres more or less. SECTION 2. That the above-described property be rezoned from (Tract)1) A-1, Agricultural District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial Dist. (Tract 2) A-1, Agricultural District to R-0, Residential -Office Dist. PASSED AND APPROVED this It day of 5EPTM3SFZ APPROVED• , 1973. ROY CLINTON, Chairman • • • RESOLUTION PC 29.1-73 WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Tuesday, September 11, 1973, the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the final plat of Winwood II Subdivision, Phase I submitted by Fayetteville Land Company, Inc, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that because the necessary improve- ments have not been installed in said subdivision that Fayetteville Land Company, Inc. enter into and furnish the City with the necessary subdivision contract before the Board of Directors accepts this final subdivision plat. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYEITEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. The necessary subdivision contract be executed with the City prior to the Board of Directors accepting the final subdivision plat, access with Winwood Drive be shown on the plat, and sidewalk be shown on Susan Drive. SECTION 2. That the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas accept the final plat along with the land dedicated for streets and other public uses in the Winwood II Sub- division, Phase I described as follows: A part of the WA, NW Frac. t and part of the NWt, SWy, of Section 2, T -16-N, R -30-W, of the 5th P.M., Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which is N 1° 8' 39" E 200 feet from the SE corner of the NWj, SWy, of said Section 2, and running thence N 1° 8' 39" E 1323.78 feet; thence N 89° 16' 19" W 776.92 feet; thence S 00 31' 24" W 764.62 feet; thence S 87° 59' 5" E 73 feet; thence S 2° 15' 39" W 344.23 feet; thence S 89° 16' 19" E 402 feet; thence S 8° 26' 19" W 165.05 feet; thence S 89° 16' 19" E 131.30 feet; thence S 1° 8' 39" W 50 feet; thence S 89° 16' 19" E 190 feet to the point of beginning. PASSED AND APPROVED this llth day of September , 1973. APPROVED* ROY CLINTQN, Chairman RESOLUTION PC 29.2-73 WHEREAS, a discussion was held by the Fayetteville Planning Commission, Tuesday, September 11, 1973, and WHEREAS, after the discussion, the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on a proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan on Highway 62 West to the City Limits; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the proposed amendment, attached hereto and made a part hereof, be adopted to amend the Land Use Plan in accordance with the plan presented by Mr. Larry Wood, Planning Consultant. PASSED AND APPROVED this llth day of September , 1973. APPROVED: ROY CLINTON, Chairman