HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-04-20 MinutesMINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
The Fayetteville, Arkansas, Planning Commission met at 4:00 P.M.,
Tuesday, April 20, 1971, in the Directors Room, City Administration
Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas,
Members Present: Byron Boyd, Dr. James Mashburn, Dr. Walter Brown,
Roy Clinton, Ernest Jacks, Helen Edmiston,
Members Absent: Al Donaubauer, Albert Witte, L. M. McGoodwin.
Others Present: Gene Thrasher, Ervan Winberly, Gene Garrett, Larry Wood,
Harold Lieberenz, Joe Cogdell, David Faught, Lois
Slaughter, Wesley Howe,
Chairman Roy Clinton called the meeting to order.
The first matter considered by the Planning Commission was the Final
Plat Phase II Development and a Replat of Final Plat of Phase I
Country Club Estates. Mr. Lieberenz explained that Phase I had
already been filed, but it was found that Phase II made some changes
in the dimensions of some lots shown on Phase I, The plat has been
held up for months to satisfy Paul Mattke, City Engineer. Everything
has now been cleared to his satisfaction and he has signed the plat.
Ernest Jacks said the Subdivision Committee has also reviewed the
plat and are satisfied.
COUNTRY CLUB
ESTATES, Final Plat
Phase II and Replat
of Phase I
The second matter considered by the Planning Commission was the
petition to close that portion of Elm Street between Leverett Avenue
and Chestnut Avenue filed by Gene Thrasher and John B. May. Harold PETITION TO CLOSE
Lieberenz explained that everything is in order except written con- PORTION OF ELM ST,
firmation from the telephone company has not been received. The local Gene Thrasher
representative feels there is no problem. Mr. Lieberenz suggested that t
the Planning Commission might approve the closing of the street with
the recommendation that the Board of Directors not act until the
telephone company approves. Roy Clinton questioned whether the University
might have fenced the 20 ft, dedicated for a street just South of the
University Farm. Mr. Lieberenz did not feel they had because it was
not reflected on Mr. Thrashers survey.
The third item considered by the Planning Commission was the Preliminary
Plat of Thrasher -May Subdivision, a Replat of Block 2 and part of Block 3,
Parkers Plat of Valley View Acres. Mr. Lieberenz explained that this
plat divides the property into two main areas. It has gone before the
Plat Review Committee. Everything seems in order.
Preliminary Plat
Ernest Jacks asked what the difference between a dedication of easement
for street purposes and a dedication for street right of way was and why
the plat showed an easement for utilities and street on the North side.
Mr. Lieberenz said he had recommended this because Mr. Thrasher does not
need the street for his development and does not wish to build the street.
Roy Clinton asked if he planned to improve Leverett and Mr. Thrasher said
he did. Mr. \Clinton said a performance bond or contract would be required
to insure the improvement of the portion of Leverett Street North of Poplar.
4-20-71 -2-
Wesley Howe explained that from an administrative standpoint there is some
advantage to the easement rather than a ROW dedication. With a ROW
dedication, the City has the responsibility of cutting weeds, etc. If
it is an easement, it stays in ownership of the developer and he has
the responsibility of maintaining it until it is developed as a street.
He was of the opinion the easement was what the City wants.
The next matter discussed was the revised Large Scale Development
Plan for Leverett Garden Apartments submitted by Gene Thrasher. LEVERETT GARDEN APTS,
Mr. Thrasher explained it was necessary to come b`ck for approval L. S. Development
again, because the FHA changed the apartment layout. Mr. Lieberenz
said the only problem encountered on plat review was a setback problem
on some of the buildings. However, the Subdivision Committee did not
think we were following exactly the requirements of the ordinance as
the plan did not show utilities, proposed and existing, nor did it
show drainage and proposed grading changes. The Developer has since
presented a plan correcting setbacks to meet the zoning requirements,
showing water mains, sewer mains and proposed drainage. Mr. Jacks
said he was concerned about topo changes and where the storm Crater
would go. Mr. Lieberenz asked Mr. Thrasher to clarify what he intends
to do with the North 186 ft. Mr. Thrasher said he would like to have
this deleted from the plan. He will still build the street to the ROW
for the North street. The width of Poplar Street was discussed. Ervan
Wimberly said it is already 30 ft. off the centerline on the North side.
The next matter discussed by the Commission was the proposed Preliminary
Plat of Garrett -Richardson Subdivision for property located on the South
side of Mt. Comfort Road, Harold Lieberenz explained this has been
through the Plat Review Committee and Subdivision Committee. Larry Wood
asked for a stub street to either the East or West and one is shown to
the East. There is no sewer service in this area yet. One lot is 7 ft.
narrower than requirement for lots with septic tanks. Planning Commission
can vary this. Easements are adequate for sewer service at a later date.
One property owner has not been contacted, this person is incompetent and
they are unable to determine who to contact in her behalf. Mr. Garrett
plans to develop part at a time and would like a building permit for.the
lot adjoining Mt. Comfort Road. The Plat Review Committee did not object
so long as the house faces the proposed street and has access off the
proposed street.
Ernest Jacks asked why Larry Wood had not felt a street should be stubbed
both East and West. Mr. Wood explained that the creek to the South made
it unlikely that a network of streets would develop here. He foresees
rather a loop pattern off and back onto Mt. Comfort Road.
The next matter discussed was the resubmittal on the preliminary plat
of East Gate Addition No. 2. Harold Lieberenz gave a history of the
original submittal on East Gate No. 2. The plat had been disapproved
because of the street lay out. One property 'owner with one lot is
blocking his adhereing to the recommendations of the Planning Commission.
This proposal covers only 4 lots. The Plat Review Committee recommended
denial unless he will off set the street 25 ft. on the South. The
Subdivision Committee agrees with this. Mr. Barrett was contacted by
phone by the engineer and agreed to offset the street.
GARRETT-,
RICHARDSON SUB.
EAST GATE ADD. #2 I
Preliminary Plat
4-20-71 -3-
The next item before the Commission was the development plan for property
abutting Highway 71 By -Pass, a controlled access highway, at 16th
Street and West Custer Lane submitted by Joe B. Cogdell. Harold
Lieberenz referred to a map showing the location of the 71 By -Pass
right-of-way. There is an ordinance calling for an access road to
be constructed alongside the By -Pass. There are some other problems
here dealing with setbacks for which Mr. Cogdell is going before the
Board of Adjustment. Another problem the Commission will have to
decide on deals with the curb cuts. Entrances shown on the plot plan
do not comply with the ordinance regulating curb cuts. The Commission
may vary the curb cut regulations.
Mr. Cogdell told Mr. Clinton that all the other lots to the South are
residential. The difficulty of getting an access road at this point
was discussed at length. The platted lots back up to the right-of-way
for the By -Pass. It was noted that it would not be possible to use
West Custer Lane as an access road because it curves back to the East
and houses are already built on it.
JOE B. COGDELL
The discussion of I-1, Heavy Commercial & Light Industrial, around
the rezoning request of Kelley Brothers Lumber & Supply Company was DISCUSSION ON I-1
deferred until the next meeting. Larry Wood had not had time to ON JOHNSON ROAD
study this and compare it with the trucking uses on Highway 112. The
Board of Directors had deferred final action on the Kelley Brothers
rezoning request until the Planning Commission decides what to recommend
on the balance of the I-1.
Under "Other Business", Mr. Lieberenz told the Commission that the Plat
Review Committee had reviewed the Bob J. Mayes request for permission
to develop a mobile home park East of Garland and South of the University
Farm as requested by the Commission April 6. Although the Major Street
Plan does not show a street through here, it has been recommended by
Mr. Wood and other people that this be an BO ft. street. David Malone,
City Attorney, Wesley Howe, City Manager, Larry Wood, Paul Mattke, Water
and Sewer Superintendent, and Junior Parker, Street Superintendent, had
met to determine a policy on this problem. They recommend that this
trailer park request be denied as the property is only 104 ft. wide.
Also, the City Engineer was not sure they could get into sewer mains, and
if not, they would need 40 acres for a septic tank system. It has been
recommended that the Commission deny this application.
The Commission returned to action on the matters previously discussed.
BOB J. MAYES
Appeal for
Mobile Home Park
Ernest Jacks moved that the Commission approve the Final Plat of Phase II Final Plat of
Development and a Replat of Final Plat of Phase I. Country Club Estates. COUNTRY CLUB
Byron Boyd seconded. It was approved unanimously. ESTATES
RESOLUTION PC -20-71 xxxxxxKXXXXXxxxxxxxxx
Dr. James Mashburn moved that the Commission recommend approval of the CLOSING ELM ST*
closing of Elm Street between Chestnut and Leverett if the telephone
company consents. Ernest Jacks seconded. It was approved unanimously.
4-20-71 -4-
Ernest Jacks recommended approval of the preliminary plat of Thrasher -
May Subdivision if this matter of dedication of right-of-way versus THRASHER -MAY SUED.
easement for street is worked out. Dr. Mashburn seconded. It was
approved unanimously.
Regarding the Leverett Garden Apartments plan, Mr. Lieberenz pointed
out that the day care center shown on the plans is a conditional use LEVERETT GARDEN APT
and must be approved by the Commission. Ernest Jacks moved that the
development plan be apprvoed with amendments shown and with the day
care center and further with the suggestion that they set the line
on the North where they want it to be. He noted he did not intend
this for approval of mobile homes on the North 186 ft. Dr. Mashburn
seconded. It was approved unanimously.
Ernest Jacks moved that the preliminary plat of Garrett -Richardson GARRETT-RICHARDSON
Subdivision be approved and that Mr. Lieberenz be authorized to issue Preliminary Plat
one building permit on Lot 1, Block 1, and that the Commission waive
the 100 ft. frontage requirement for one lot. Dr. Mashburn seconded.
It was approved unanimously.
Dr. Mashburn recommended approval of the resubmittal on the Preliminary
Plat of East Gate Addition No. 2 with the 25 ft, offset in street EAST GATE ADD. #2
design requested by the Plat Review Committee, Byron Boyd seconded. Preliminary Plat
It was approved unanimously.
The Commission discussed the Joe B. Cogdell development plan again.
Mr. Jacks was concerned because there is a lot of property between JOE B. COGDELL
this intersection and Cato Springs Road. The map giving access points Controlled Access
granted by the Arkansas Highway Department was checked and also the
engineering plans for this intersection.
Dr. Brown left the meeting at 5:15 P.M.
Mr. Howe, Mr. Lieberenz, and the Commission discussed the curb cuts
shown in relation to the ordinance regulating curb cuts.
Ernest Jacks recommended that the development plan be approved as to
curb cuts and access road (none shown). Byron Boyd seconded. It was
approved unanimously.
Ernest Jacks moved that the appeal for a mobile home park on the property
South of the University Farm and East of Garland by Bob J. Mayes be
denied because the City needs property here for a future street and BOB J. MAYES
because of the sewer problem, etc. Helen Edmiston seconded. It was Mobile Home Park
approved unanimously.
Ernest Jacks also recommended the initiation of a public hearing on
designation of street immediately South of University Farm rather than MAJOR STREET PLAN
Elm Street as a major street. Dr. Mashburn seconded. It was approved
unanimously.
0
4-20-71
-5-
Larry Wood presented some recommendations to the Commission that had
evolved from a study he and Harold Lieberenz had made of the various STUDY OF R-0 DIST.
R-0, Residential -Office Districts. On a map showing the existing
R-0 he had prepared an overlay with his recommendations for changes.
1. GREEN ACRES ROAD: Properties South of Poplar on the West side
of Green Acres Road have the zoning split between R-0 and C-2.
He recommended they be split with the R-0 on the North and the
C-2 on the South to Sycamore. He wanted to check and be sure
no single piece of property was split by zoning.
David Faught, who took Mike McDowell's place as Assistant Executive
Director of the Housing Authority, was introduced.
2. AROUND TRENTON STREET AND HIGHWAY •7,1: Mr. Wood recommended
the section bordering on College remain R-0, with R-2 to the
West as far as Park Avenue. The R-2 would serve as a buffer
between the R-0 and R-1.
Lois Slaughter who owns the motel on Trenton objected to her property
being in the R-0. She said it was commercial when they purchase; it.
Dir. Wood explained he had left it R-0 because of the bad grade on College
and that property_hdre is beginning to corner into the residential area.
3. AROUND DOWNTOWN AREA: Mr. Wood recommended that the C-2 and
C-3 along College be connected together and that the R-0 be taken
off College. On the East side of College, he recommended that
• the Tebbets House, Library, and medical offices be R-0. He
felt R-0 for the Tebbets House would provide a retaining buffer
between commercial and R-1.
He proposed reducing some of the C-3 to R-0. He recommended
following the railroad tracks from Meadow to South with R-0, as
this is all residential now. He said his proposals and the needs
of the Housing Authority correspond.
James Mashburn moved that a public hearing be called for the purpose of
amending the R-0 and other zoning districts as proposed. Helen Edmiston
seconded. It was approved unanimously.
XXXXXXXXY=J0O(XXXXXX= RESOLUTION PC 22-71 XXxXxXXXxXXXxxXXxxXX
Mr. Faught assured Mr. Clinton this would not create any problems for
the Urban Renewal Program. He said this would effect all zoning changes
within the project area.
The minutes of April 6, 1971, Planning Commission meeting were approved
as mailed.
Mr. Clinton asked the Commission to keep in mind the letter from Mr. Eason
concerning duplexes in R-1.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 P.M.
0
RESOLUTION PC 20-71
WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Tuesday, April 20, 1971, the
Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of
Directors on the final subdivision plat known as Phase II Development
and a Replat of Final Plat of Phase I Country Club Estates submitted
by Jimmie Taylor Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
SECTION 1. That the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas accept the final
plat along with the land dedicated for streets and other public uses in
the Phase II Development and a Replat of Final Plat of Phase I Country
Club Estates subdivision described as follows:
Part of the Northwest Quarter (NW ) of the Northwest Quarter (MI -41)
and part of the Southwest Quarter (SW�) of the Northwest Quarter (NIV11)
and part of the Northwest Quarter (Nrlw) of the Southwest Quarter (SI -114)
all in Section 27 and part of the Northeast Quarter (NES) of the
Northeast Quarter (NE�) and part of the Southeast Quarter (SE4) of
the Northeast Quarter^(NE ) and part of the Southwest Quarter (SW -41)
of the Northeast Quarter (IES) and part of the Northeast Quarter (NE14)
of the Southeast Quarter (SEW) all in Section 28, T -16-N, R -30-W,
Washington County, Arkansas, and more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the NEJ of the SE4 of said
Section 28 thence S 86°14140" E, 794.96.'feet along the South line
of said NE4 of the SE� to the centerline of an existing road;
thence N 05058158" E, 69.86 feet along the centerline of an existing
road; thence N 05°58'58" E, 285.47 feet along the centerline of an
existing road; thence N 05°00142" W, 83.91 feet along the centerline
of an existing road to an intersection with the centerline of Country
Club Road, said intersection being at a point of curvature in Country
Club Road; thence Southeasterly along the centerline of Country Club
Road along an arc having a length of 395.42 feet with a radius of 309.32
feet to a point of curvature in Country Club Road; thence Southeasterly
along the centerline of said road along an arc having a length of 187.33
feet and a radius of 216.23 feet to a point of curvature, thence S 28037'02" E,
49.97 feet along a tangent section of said Country Club Road; thence
S 28037102" E, 45.30 feet to a point on the South line of the NE,-, of
the SE14 of said Section 28; thence S 86014140" E, 69.15 feet to the
Southeast corner of said NEIV of the SE4 of Section 28; thence S 87011120"
E, 1323.22 feet along the South line of the NW14 of the SVI--,i-, of Section 27
to the Southeast corner of said NW� of the SW4 of Section 27; thence
NO3006'40" E, 849.55 feet along the East line of said NW14 of the SW,'
of Section 27; thence N 70003130" W, 350.19 feet; thence N 44047'00" W,
332.31 feet; thence N 22016'00" W, 423.66 feet; thence N 13031133" W,
379.20 feet; thence N 13127140" W, 170.85 feet; thence N 11044100" W,
227.99 feet; thence N 07101'201' E, 331.63 feet to the North line of
the SW� of the NW4 of said Section 27; thence N 86052'10" 111 264.93
feet along the North line of said SW,-, of the Nrli of Section 27; thence
�' N 03010100" E, 873.56 feet; thence N 8695120" W, 183.39 feet; thence
S03003'40" W, 916.03 feet to an intersection with the centerline of
an existing road;. thence S 28032114" W, 97.91 feet along said center-
line to a point of curvature; thence Southwesterly along the center-
line of said road along an arc having a length of 196.98 feet and a
radius of 463.74 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 04011'59' lel,
109.91 feet along the centerline of said existing road to a point of
curvature; thence Southwesterly along the centerline of said existing
road along an are having a length of 284.60 feet and a radius of 183.30
feet to a point of tangency; thence N86°50129" W, 670.41 feet along
the centerline of said existing road to an intersection with the
centerline of Country Club Road; thence N 08°00127" E, 204.41 feet to
the centerline of Country Club Road at a point of curvature; thence
Northeasterly along the centerline of Country Club Road along an
are having a length of 171.91 feet and a radius of 280.72 feet to a
point of curvature; thence N 47123138" E, 142.67 feet along the center-
line of Country Club Road in a tangent section; thence Northerly along
the centerline of; Country Club Road along an arc having a length of
186.02 feet and a radius of 70.76 feet to a point of curvature; thence
N 13013140" W, 36.05 feet to the'North line of the SE4 of the NE4 of
Section 28• thence N 86°52110" W, 409.28 feet to the Northwest corner
of said SEI of the NE4 of Section 28; thence S 031091101, W, 655.16
feet along the West line of said SEI of the NEW of Section 28; thence
S 03017f2011 W, 326.77 feet along the West line of the SE,i-, of the NEW
of Section 28; thence S 64°11110" W, 313.91 feet; thence S 03°28'40" 'W3
177.91 feet to the South line of the SWI of the NE4 of said Section 28;
thence S 86°58140" E, 278.73 feet along the South line of said SWI of
the NE4 to the Southeast corner of said SWI of the NE4 of Section 28;
thence S 03041150" W, 1315.77 feet along the West line of the NEI
of the SEI of said Section 28 to the point of beginning. Containing
119.42 net acres.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of April , 1971.
ATTEST:
ERNEST JACKS, SECRETARY
APPROVED:
ROY CLINTON, CHAIRMAN
• RESOLUTION PC 22-71
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made a study of the R-0, Residential
Office Districts, in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission now desires to have a public hearing on the
rezoning of certain R-0, Residential Office Districts, and surrounding zoning
districts.
M13 THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED:
SECTION 1. That a public hearing be held on the question of rezoning the
folloving hereinafter described tracts and to rezone each tract as hereinafter
noted.
Tract No. 1: Beginning at the Nif corner of Lot Ten (10), Block
1^, Park village Addition <<r]?icll is a point located on ttie east
ROW line of Park Avenue, thence north along the east P.r1'.':' line of
Park Avenue to the point where the east ROW line of Park Avenue
intersects ::ith the south ROW lire of Prospect Street, thence
east in a :Northeasterly direction along the south ".!'•:' line of
PTOSpeCt Street to the point ?-:here the south ::".Ot" line of Prosnect
Street intersects with the :gest ROl!" line of north -south portio,.
of alley between Block 17 and Mock 13 in Parti:. Village '11dditi011
• thence so'Sti! in a SOut'n.lesterly dlrect;0il alomi the '.gest line of
alley to the sout.ieast corner of Lot 1, Plock 13 in Parl: Village
Addition, thence westerly along the south line of Lots 1, 2, 3
and part o`_ I.ot 4 of Block. 13 in Parh Village Addition to a point
on Lot 4 ,;lie'i is due north of. ?;rest ".Oi:' line of. Lollar Lane, thence
south to file southeast corner of Lot l of clock 19 in Park. Village
Addition., thence west along south lin.!: of Lot 6 to tine soutlirest
corner of Lot 6, thence south in a Southwesterly direction along
the south line of Lot 7 of Bloc; 1S in ?'ark ':'i.11age %rAlitien to the
northeast corner Of Lot 10 of Bloc`: 1S In Park Village rtdditl.on,
tinea crest along the north lido of Lot 1.0 of Dlocl: l'II in :'ar'.•:
Villaae !'-.ddition to the noi.nt of 1.`euli?n1P.r_: from �'.-0. �£s;dential
Iffice ,istrict to R-1, Lo?. Density ?.•side:rtial District.
Tract :Io. 2: Beginning at;:oit:t l?cre `e as i i line o=
a
1llfiwith Avenue intersects ith the north line Of i?i C':s On `;tTeef,
thence inert?' aion h nn ..1 lin. ' :1 _ � t0
the £est r. t. e o= io�lan Ave -:?:e
Northt!est (-N'ti) corner of Lot �- Of "loci: tell (10) of ti. '..O itn ty
Court P.`{d; tion, thence ea-st alone! north line of Lot a to t'^c
Northeast corr-er of Lot 3 1:hici? is a ;;Din ..
t on '::e :':est �7f iine of
OliC^e .'.Vi?,^.11e, tl.ence souti, along tie `:est �•'.�?�'i line O` r-oll",^,C
i n t', r C i �•0 Bf i in t o
Avenue to �!.e nein_ >.`In rc t'le gest e of Cel lege .'.vena_.
intersects :;i�'.^, the north "-''''i line of est
along tL'e nO r'ii ,�+i'i line Of Spr i,? CtT'(?,t t0 t.nC JOIIt,l'.Csf CO1'nCr
of Lot r, elvo (12) o t.^.e S.i?DdiV151011 0= F,', CC' ()ne (1) Of tile.
Original Tori.': Flat :'riiiCt? L c point. OP. t}1C C%LSt line of tl?C
• north -south alley location in Bloc I of the Original i
thence north along east line of the alley running north and south
in Bloch: 1 to the south ROP.1 line of Dickson Street, thence rest
along the south line of Dickson Street to a point where the east
ROW line of Highland, if extended south, would intersect with the
south line of Dickson Street, thence north to the point of be6inning;
from R-0, Residential District to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial
District,
Tract No. 3: Beginning at a point on the north ROW line of Spring,
£troot -here the north 11.011; line of Spring Street intersects v:ith
the east R011i li.ne of College Avenue, thence east along the north
8018 line of Spring Street 220 feet, thence- north 110 feet, thence
east 60 feet, thence north to the north, line of Dickson Street
Rnw, thence :rest along north ROW line of Dickson Street 120 feet,
thence north 250 feet, thence west 160 foot to the east ROIL' line of
College Avenue, thence south along the east 1:0111,1 of College Avenue
to the point of beginning; from R-0, Residential Office Di -strict to
C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District,
Tract X'o. 4: Beginning on the north ROI,' line of Spring Street at
the point where the north ROP: line of Spr.inal Street intersects with
the west RMI.7 line of Block Avenue, thence :Pest along the north Rm0 ,
line: -of Spring Street 155 feet, thence south along the north -south
alley located in Block 12 of the n1ri.ginal Towle Plat to t; -le north --
ROW line of '11eadoiv Street, thence crest to the east ROW line of
Church Avenue, thence north along the east I' i':' line of Church
Avenue to the north POW line of Sarin,a. Street, thence west alone
north Ito' -r line of Spring Street to the Sig corner of Lot 18 of Vic
Subdivision of Block 5 of the Original Town Plat vlii.ch is a point
on the north-s.uth alley in Block 5 of the 0rigi.nal Tol':n Plat,
thence north along the north -south alley in said Bloc'. S to the
Sout1west corner of Lct 3 of rloc1: 5, thence east to the Southeast
comer of Lot 3 of Block 4 of the Subdivision of Bloc'.: of the
Original Town Plat, thence north 65 feet, thence east to *;,e :.est
8011' line of Block Avenue, t1ionce south t0 t1'e poi-nt of beginnlncr;
from C-3, Central Commercial District to R-0, Resi'lenti.al. Iffice
District.
Tract %Io. 5: Bcginn ing at tiie Sout':elst corner of L.Ot 1 Of '•l eC?c
1.°, of the origlllal IIowl, !'Iat at;l i.Cn is a pOlnt On the east -West
alley in "lock 13 Of the 4iria.inal 10i''n Plat, thence :Jest 3101?
east Brest alley In °LOCI: 1S to the COi:ti::•'Cet Col'11Cr Of TOt 2 Of
Blost( 13. T. honcc north along. the east "2!1'1:' l:.ne. Of LOc st ,i nnUe
to the Bout R li:' i_.i.ae of 8!eado:. Street, Blease east aeon^ tP,e
south 1.01' line of ieadow Street to t ,e :•:est. :�OPd line of ..aurci:
Avenue, thence south al.on the crest F:ni9 i.ine o_" Church -\venae to
the pOlilt Of i:eglnillnt from :-n, 1'.eSidC?1 `L 131 ^'ff _IC o :)iStr:Ct t0
C-3, Central Commercial District.
PAGE 3
Tract No 6: Beginning at a point on the Southeast corner of Block
36 of the Original Town Plat, thence nest along the north P.OF? line
of South Street to the point where it intersects with tilt east '.tn?�F
line of the spur track of the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad,
thence north in a Northwesterly direction along the ea€.t 8014 of file
railroad to the point where it i.ntersectstwi.th the south ROW line
of 'ieadow Street, thence east alone the south ROW line of ?V1eadoi,7
Street to the east ROW line of West Avenin thence south along the
east ROW line of 'Host :\venue to the point of beginning; from I-1,
Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial Di.str ict to R-0, Resi.dent.ial.
Office District,
t.Fli'.:1CC Y1C):i G?' j Q Cwt• F::O ':. C::. l,c._., to C;!F; C,,.. P„o
TRACT N0. 8: }o_:' ,:' c_?
i.`J1:. .. _.:_. F"iiL1 It_'l-s !.�: J)C.: �._:�' I:... ... __.,..•.l t I7=�o
it T3. li.__21' ft_.fC Cc:.,.:
i.' r:].l OS l':_ t)^' c__ !�Y ....•\•`:�r I':Fa�i','f'):'`'.)
}�^�,�ilnl'1
S` c
?lI?v
GZl i,}:.:1 tt.0i'Lil
TRACT No. 7:
�il`.7 li
^pA i"i•.i..o
,..
C_
t.Fli'.:1CC Y1C):i G?' j Q Cwt• F::O ':. C::. l,c._., to C;!F; C,,.. P„o
TRACT N0. 8: }o_:' ,:' c_?
i.`J1:. .. _.:_. F"iiL1 It_'l-s !.�: J)C.: �._:�' I:... ... __.,..•.l t I7=�o
it T3. li.__21' ft_.fC Cc:.,.:
i.' r:].l OS l':_ t)^' c__ !�Y ....•\•`:�r I':Fa�i','f'):'`'.)
}�^�,�ilnl'1
S` c
?lI?v
GZl i,}:.:1 tt.0i'Lil
ia).•i
�il`.7 li
^pA i"i•.i..o
,..
C_
Oi' j.};G
e,.:�i•
lift;) :.. •�
of
cn'I 'i C?.-.,
f.,nv �.},-
rr_,.•
...
9°7
C„
s
rU.
)
.I _.
no.-- i;..
Ci.' 'i.:..
_
220
i,p?1;:.
:;p:`i.Yl i7
iC�::G,.
C.. A.._ L'_..
i!?'%
fC':;
...�•._:,..•:
V
CC:i'i2C G'
.L
Qi'
_...
L' p
t.Fli'.:1CC Y1C):i G?' j Q Cwt• F::O ':. C::. l,c._., to C;!F; C,,.. P„o
TRACT N0. 8: }o_:' ,:' c_?
i.`J1:. .. _.:_. F"iiL1 It_'l-s !.�: J)C.: �._:�' I:... ... __.,..•.l t I7=�o
it T3. li.__21' ft_.fC Cc:.,.:
i.' r:].l OS l':_ t)^' c__ !�Y ....•\•`:�r I':Fa�i','f'):'`'.)
}�^�,�ilnl'1
S` c
?lI?v
GZl i,}:.:1 tt.0i'Lil
ia).•i
,..
C_
"✓..
_Ji'., t3 v_,.
i'.li i::.
:Cil
?.=
9°7
�.LC�
C„
s
rU.
)
no.-- i;..
Ci.' 'i.:..
:;!!
:
_._
...�•._:,..•:
V
CC:i'i2C G'
Qi'
.
l.l1iC
Of f,�
Mn
0
11.0<0 fermi. toiiihG^., co:rno;.' of "11c)o'I.
focc, {'. e7^.0 C(tE IJ fC:.:.l•y tll;:l :'.0 IiOi'i.}7 67 1C '.i:n {l}l:^.0 C,t %'('Ica.>
1:'.0340 Ox 1G 55 •1-r '; ks ."V'! .i.:L`.lG Of C: 'G"-1 !tC s'G: 1?O�;;i,g 'i:}7^T;CC ;Gi:ii.11 :.il
to t lJ S:C
r. Soucl:c
-i;orly
'oci,.o>1
.:h
vee;• RC%;
)JI .n�
n
o:
Gx•cGa
Ac}'c„
<t'
t0 t17"' ]30i11V YL?.7:i'.. tho 1:':.:: it 1?Ci}} .}J.lIG O% CiL CCI!1 !lCrCs 1:0!1 7�1:•C:. ,.JC'i:;�
i pn�.} ' E'. o 1',' i i. i
S lltti $}:J Si: S:• ._ 1:;11.• Ci.i 1}Oi'i•11 (;Cii.},Ciy.. !:'t'011ll 1.}?;1C:: �O u.l :11
Vic:,. '1: r ^ Y I n^•lo /
So` ..._. ,-• 1 ' e1.i`aco:i.ea .011[ t• t: P,G'.'} i;l . o.. Co_-ta :v :nn to 'i: e13
7102,1LIC o- 'Im 10L 11 R0'' 1h'c Of
.8 RC7i �C:.6
,
n
rest. t.0 t}i5: n0.'t11'G Ol 1)3'�{:i1117 a1105
TRACT NO. 9: i o:•::..., i o.1
}9CY1'�: R:::;o;10 C%'^1, T10'_'OU.p'}1f�. 'O (:0;: ;:-C 211, 1)',',,. --'i -'- $o R•rJ_..
all. of
}iG`;ani]J.iiC� civ }'O7_iL O' 111'J ::Oil:.}I. 1C(1;')
line, 01 1'O;". 1;1T
301; £Gail e of •I ) 11
i::ia �(C 1G: i• 'tiO'� l• O_ bl::; wt•.��}l:';::,;I CJ _7 ° . •) _
Of S Gt {.O_l Jg T`'?.0=}'y } • • 0 '': y {'11 :1^ C.'.Sv {t11
o t11^• ])O U,o*, h t}•C .r, LSl }.(T:i
1211^ of }'CfjJl•_^.1" }i'Ci'C:GiJ •L 'r1J:vh
- D
t}7':i?CO JOli1 211 �`:.iri;h: „u•C'2`1� ''L2',C''iII1Ui'[, t1.0 S'C.;t }?C):r ^
U. : L..011
I'y1] 0 of C'_'GCi21
Acrco Rood 620 fcc� thou :.' ]
D c tr: ;c to tho c",o 73`op:a-;.v 1-:ii1<; o_ t11
}'C;;y: :;tCi•illo i:C11p Cil t I7POPCI'1'-Yy tl:•^.'s?C-.^. YsO.: i:!1 cloi?•`� t}7?. E3::'•.: n:"i1•J::'i'i:y:
Mlle,' Of {;;:. SC11opl ): I" �• .
1=o r ;r to tl p09+r� o_
SECTION 2. That said public hearing shall be held on July 6, 1971, or at
the earliest nossible date thereafter, in the Directors Room, City Administration
Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of April , 1971.
APPROVED:
ROY CLINTON CH_4IFMAIN
.,T7 ST:
ER,%•::. JACKS, CHAIi-WAN _ —