Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-03-16 Minutes0 I* MINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING The Fayetteville Planning Commission met at 4:00 P.M., Tuesday, March 16, 1971, in the Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas. Members Present: Helen Edmiston, Roy Clinton, Dr. Walter Brown, L,,, M. McGoodwin, Albert Witte, "A1" Donaubauer, Ernest Jacks, Dr. James Mashburn. i Members Absent: Byron Boyd, Others Present: Wesley Howe, Harold Lieberenz, Larry Wood, Paul Jameson, Laverne Heflin, Lewis Jones, Lynn Wade, John Carson, Charles Scharlau, Pete Young, Paul Engskov, C. T. Pearson, Jr. Mike McDowell, and other unidentified persons. Chairman Roy Clinton called the meeting to order. The first item on the agenda was the proposed replat of a portion of Meadowlark Addition. As a form of explanation, Mr. Clinton stated REPLAT PORTION OF that the public hearing on the preliminary plat had been closed at MEADOWLARK ADDITION the last meeting and the Commission did not expect to hear any opponents or proponents. However, a number of people opposing the replat were present and were represented by Paul Jameson, Attorney and requested to be heard. Mr. McGoodwin said the Commission has demonstrated a great deal of concern for the neighbors by withholding action prior to this time and he saw no choice but to approve the plat as it meets all requirements. L•. M. McGoodwin moved that the Commission approve the preliminary plat to replat Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 7, and Part of Lot 2, Block 6, Meadowlark Addition. Dr. Walter Brown seconded the motion. Paul Jameson said one of his clients had received a letter advising them a hearing was to be held on this matter today. Mr. Lieberenz said no letter was mailed, but an agenda was mailed to one of the opponents. Laverne Heflin said he had understood at the last meeting this was put off until this meeting so the opponents could come back better prepared. Ernest Jacks arrived at 4:15 P.M. Mr. Jameson said he was retained after the last meeting and had made about 4 trips to the Planning Office and obtained certain documents and papers and was led to believe there would be an opportunity to present a case today. Mr. Lieberenz said this was not the case, the Planning Office is obliged to give any information requested to attorneys. Mr. McGoodwin withdrew his motion and Dr. Brown withdrew his second. Mr. Witte said it has been said the Commission has no basis to approve the plat and therefore, he moved that the Commission re -open the case to discuss one question. Does this comply with our regulations or not: 3-16-71 -2- Helen Edmiston seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously. The proponents said they had nothing else to add; they felt the plat complied with the City's requests and what the ordinance requires. Mr. Lieberenz explained the reason for sending Mr. Heflin the agenda was because he had approached the Planning Office at various times before and after the public hearing, and it was felt he should receive an agenda showing this matter would be brought up today. Paul Jameson speaking on behalf of the opponents said he thought the Commission had the authority to act with judgment on these matters rather than to just administer the minimum standards. He gave as reasons why he did not feel the plat met standards: (1) Cato Springs Road was 50 ft. wide, the General Plan calls for urban collectors to be 60 ft. wide with curb and gutter and rural collectors to be 80 ft. wide with drainage. (2) Subdivision regulations require blocks to be two tiers of lots except when fronting on a major street or when impossible due to topography; Block 6 1s only one tier of lots. (3) In Block 7, Lots 1, 22 3, and 4, and Lots 12, 132 14, and 15 are arranged with their backs abutting the sides of the adjoining lots. He labeled this poor planning. Lewis Jones, Attorney for Meadowlark, told Mr. Jameson that Block 6 was already platted as only one tier of lots, this is only a replat. Larry Wood said there has been no determination as to what is defined as an urban street and what is defined as a rural street. It has been assumed anything inside the City was an urban street. Cato Springs Road is shown on the Major Street Plan as a collector street. Dr. Mashburn arrived at 4:45 P.M• Chairman Clinton declared the public hearing on Meadowlark replat closed. L. M. McGoodwin moved that the preliminary plat to replat part of Meadowlark be approved. Ernest Jacks seconded. The votecwas taken. Voting for approval of the plat were Jacks, Mashburn, and McGoodwin. Voting against approval of the plat were Donaubauer, Witte, and Brown. Chairman Clinton said he must vote to break the tie and voted for approval of the plat, whereupon Mrs. Edmiston said she must vote against approval of the plat. There remained a tie vote. No action was taken further. Lewis Jones remarked that failure of the Planning Commission to either approve or disapprove the plat in his opinion would actually be deemed approval of the plat. The next item on the agenda was the rezoning petition of A. W. Realty for property located on the East side of Highway 71 North in the vicinity of Stearns Road and Joyce Street and extending South of Mud Creek from A.W. REALTY A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Low Density Residential District, East side of to I-1, Heavy Commercial & Light Industrial District, C-2, Thoroughfare Highway 71 N Commercial District, C-3, Central Commercial District, and R-3, High 40 Density Residential District, continued from March 2, 1971. V 3-16-71 -3- Wesley Howe presented a memo to the Commission upholding the staff recommendations made by Larry Wood at the March 2, 1971 meeting. He gave as the basis for his conclusions the statement of Community Land Use Goals and development objectives which the Planning Commission forwarded to the Board of Directors when the General Plan was adopted. He felt the real need at this time was for residential development. His memo was prepared because the Commission had requested a revised Staff Report to be prepared for this meeting. Lynn Wade, John Carson, and Charles Scharlau were present to represent the rezoning request. They offered to compromise on part of the zoning request by making the following changes: (1) Change the zoning requested on 40 acres in the Northeast portion from C-2 to R-2 and propose a planned unit development with a density of 450 units on the 40 acres. This is a part of Tract 3. (2) Reduced the request for Tract 5 from R-3 to R-2. Mr. Carson stated the reason for requesting C-3 on Tract 2 rather than C-2 was that a greater density is permissible in C-3 and a few uses, among them apartments, are permissible in C-3 not permissible in C-2. He said the change in request for a portion of Tract 3 as R-2 changed the ratio of residential to commercial. Mr. Howe said he felt the proposed road between Stearns Street and Joyce Street would be a logical buffer between the commercial areas and the residential area to the North. Mr. Donaubauer asked Larry Wood if the compromises offered followed his thinking. Mr. Wood said in part, yes, in part, no. His recommendations would be: (1) R-2 on 40 acre tract is reasonable on a planned unit development. If you take it out of the planned unit, he had reservations. (2) C-3 for Tract 2 is still too strong. (3) R-2 is reasonable on Tract 5. (4) Reluctant to go commercial on the North side of the street; he would tend to go R-2. (5) He felt the location of the industrial request was unfortunate, but was willing to "live with it." (6) He felt Tract 2 would'be better with R-0 South of the creek and C-2 North of the creek. He said the long range plan does not recognize anything but residential on this property nor any commercial North of the existing commercial on Millsap Road, Ernest Jacks suggested R-0 on that portion of Tract 3 between the 40 acre tract and the intersection of the two roads and C-2 West of the intersection. Mr. Wood said the uncontrolled use of R-0 bothered him because of the possible density. He cautioned the Commission to be careful of any precedent it might set on zoning. In answer to questions from Mr. Witte and Dr. Brown, Mr. Wood said he thought C-1 would take care of what is planned on Tract 4, rather than C-2. He would personally like to see that located elsewhere. John Carson again agreed to the 40 acre R-2 with a planned unit development in Tract 3, but said they had to have some flexibility. Since they foresee this as a major growth area for Northwest Arkansas, he feels they need all the commercial.requested and need the C-3 in Tract 2. They hope to enhance and use the creek in their development. Mr. Scharlau said the lease on Arkansas Western Gas's present downtown facility expires October, 1972. There is a sense of urgency. Also, Mr. Carson said I.D.C. was ready to proceed with development,:but must have zoning first. He conceded Tract 2, North of the Creek as C-2 as the Commission had requested. I• 3-16-71 -4- Mr. Witte said he was now willing to accept everything requested South of the road, but was still bothered by Tract 3. Mr. Clinton summarized the original request and changes that have been made. He said one problem the Commission has is that there is a lot of land zoned commercial and not being used. Mr. Carson offered to accept R-O,East of the intersection in Tract 3. Mr. McGoodwin said he would like to see Tract 4 reduced to C-1. They said the type of development they envision would require C-2. The Commission asked Mr. Wood his opinion of the changes thus far agreed upon. 'He said he felt they could be acceptable. Dr. Mashburn said the Commission has wanted a large scale plan like this for some time, this is the first one presented. They are going to build an East-West street and develop Mud Creek. He moved that the amended rezoning request be approved. Al Donaubauer seconded. It was approved unanimously as amended through mutual agreement. • • ••• ••• ••• •••• The next item on the agenda was the request for permission to change from one non -conforming use to another non -conforming use property ASKEW ENTERPRISE located at 245 North Church Avenue. The request was filed by Askew Change of non - Enterprises. Paul Engskov represented the request. He said the conforming use building was originally designed for preparation of food, has recently been used for warehousing and storage, and they propose to use it as a food processing plant, probably employing 4 persons initially. Dr. Mashburn moved that the request be approved; Mr. Donaubauer seconded. It was approved unanimously. Mr. Witte left the meeting. The next item on the agenda was a large scale development plan submitted by C. T. Pearson, Jr. for property located on the Southeast corner of the intersection of Sixth Street and South School Avenue. C.T.PEARSON, JR. Large -Scale There was a discussion on the recommendations of the Subdivision Committee, Development Plat Review Committee, and variances granted by the Board of Adjustment. The Subdivision Committee reported the Arkansas Highway Department had requested that 30 ft, additional ROW on School Avenue be dedicated. Mr. Pearson said he had consulted Junior Parker and he had felt that 20 ft. would be enough. He was told the Planning Office had contacted Curtis Pangle, District Engineer for A.H.D., and they had requested 30 ft. Mx. Pearson said he understood at the last meeting that if the sewer had to be replaced, it would have to be at his expense in cutting the paving. He said he had consulted Junior Parker in constructing the drainage structure. Mr. Howe asked if all parking shouldn't be back of any future street widening. 10 Mr. Jacks said the entrances and exits would need to be redesigned and worked out with the Highway Department. He also felt there should be no 3-16-71 -5- opening onto Locust Avenue since it is a residential street. Someone said the Methodist Church has purchased all that property between Sixth and Seventh Streets except one house. Mr. McGoodwin moved that the Commission approve the plan subject to Mr. Pearson dedicating the property required by Arkansas Highway Department for widening of Highway 71 and Sixth Street and meeting highway construction requirements. Al Donaubauer seconded. It was approved unanimously with a request that a letter be obtained from the Arkansas Highway Department stating these conditions have been met. The next item on the agenda was a resolution finding that the Urban Renewal Plan conforms with the Comprehensive City Plan and Zoning RESOLUTION ON Ordinance of Fayetteville. Mike McDowell of the Housing Authority URBAN RENEWAL was present. Larry Wood had reviewed the plans with him and stated some changes in zoning will need to be made, but the changes will be less intensive than existing. Mr. McDowell said the Board of Directors will be required to hold a public hearing on the Urban Renewal Plan later and if it is approved, the zoning in the Urban Renewal will become the zoning. Dr. Brown moved that the resolution be approved. Al Donaubauer seconded. It was approved unanimously. The Commission requested that the study of the R-0 Districts by Larry Wood and Harold Lieberenz be placed first on the agenda for April 6. Mr. Howe said the Commission could consider his 'memo regarding subdivision regulations and the Major Street Plan'at the April 6 meeting. He asked that a designation between urban and rural streets be added to the discussion. The minutes of March 2, 1971, were approved as mailed. The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 P.M. RESOLUTION PC 13-71 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission, Tuesday, March 2, 1971, fifteen (15) days after a sign was erected upon the property and after a notice was published in the Northwest Arkansas Times, a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to continue the rezoning petition of A W Realty Company for the portion of real estate herein- after described as Tract No. 1, Tract No. 1-A, Tract No. 2, Tract No. 3, Tract No. 4, and Tract No. 5. TRACT NO. 1: That portion of hereinafter described real estate which is presently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, and is to be rezoned to I-1, Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial District, more particularly described as follows: A part of the SW� of the NW� of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30•-W and a part of the SE4 of the NE4 and a part of the NES of the SEJ of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particu- -larly described as follows: Beginning at the SW corner of the NWw of said Section 25; thence S 67°30' W 460 feet, more or less; thence South 230 feet, more or less; thence S 84° W 300 feet, more or less; thence North 650 feet, more or less; thence curving Northeasterly 650 feet, more or less, along a 4° 18' curve; thence S 460 E 470 feet, more or less; thence South 200 feet, more or less; thence West 140 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 1-A: That portion of hereinafter described real estate which is presently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, and C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, and is to be rezoned to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, more particularly described as follows: A part of the NE4 of the SE4 and a part of the SE4 of the NE� of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 750 feet West of the SE corner of the SE4 of the NE4 of said Section 26; thence North 210 feet, more or less; thence curving Southwesterly along a 4° 18' curve 450 feet, more or less, to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 71; thence S 00 46' E 240 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 7° 46' W 202.2 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 00 46' E 175.3 feet along said right-of-way; thence N 841 E 538 feet, more or less; thence North 440 feet to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 2: That portion of hereinafter described real estate which is presently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential District, and A-1, Agricultural District, and is to be rezoned to 0-3, Central Commercial District, more"particularly described as follows: -2- A part of the NE4 of.the NE4 and a part of the SE4 of the NE-, of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, and a part of the NW4 of the NW4 and a part of the SW4 of the NW4 of Section 25, T -17-N, R-30-1, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 535 feet East, more or less, and 50 feet North, more or less, of the SW corner of the M4 of the NW4 of said Section 25; thence curving Northwesterly 1204 feet, more or less, along a 3° 42' "urve; thence N 33° W 260 feet, more or less; thence Northwesterly 403 feet, more or less, along a ll° curve to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 71; thence S 00 46' E 205.9 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 400 40' W 113.4 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 49° 50' W 181.2 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 30 49' W 125.4 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 10 411 W 700.7 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 00 46' E 400.0 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 100 33' W 204.0 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 0° 46' E 560.0 feet along said right-of-way to a point which is 115 feet North of the South line of the NES of said Section 26; thence Northeasterly 1100 feet, more or less, along a 4' 18' curve; thence N 430 E 150 feet, more or less; thence Northeasterly 960 feet, more or less, along a 0° 50' curve to the point of beginning. TRACT N0. 3: That portion of hereinafter described real estate which is presently zoned A-1, Agricultural District, and is to be rezoned to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, more particularly described as follows: iA part of the NE4 of the NE4 of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, and a part of the North half of the NW4 of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-w, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of the NE4 of the NKof said Section 25; thence West 1814 feet along the South line of the North half of the NW4 of said Section 25; thence curving Northwesterly 1522 feet, more or less, along a 30 42' circular curve having a radius of 1550 feet; thence North 33° West 260 feet, more or less; thence curving Northwesterly 403 feet, more or less, along an 110 00' circular curve having a radius of 525 feet; thence East 935.5 feet, more or less; thence South 484.6 feet along the East line of the NE4 of the NE4 of said Section 26, thence East 1400 feet; thence North 654.12 feet; thence East 1233.7 feet along the North line of NE4 of NW4 of said Section 25; thence South 1320 feet along the East line of the NE4 of the NW4 of said Section 25 to the point of beginning. TRACT N0. 4: That portion of hereinafter described real estate which is presently zoned A-1, Agricultural District, and is to be rezoned to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, more particularly described as follows: A part of the Wj of the NW4 of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 111.07 feet West of the NE corner of the SW4 of the NW4 of said Section 25; thence West 370 feet, more or less; thence Northwesterly 318 feet, more or less, along a 3° 42' curve to a point; -3 - thence Southwesterly 450 feet, more or less, along a 0° 501 curve; thence S 610 E 320 feet, more or less; thence East 640 feet, more • or less; thence North 460 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. TRACT N0, 5: That portion of hereinafter described real estate which is presently zoned A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Low Density Residential District, and is to be rezoned to R-3, High Density Residential District, more particularly described as follows: A part of the 4 of the NWI, of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, and a part of the SEI, of the NEI, of Section 26, T -17-N2 R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which is 98.93 feet East of the SE corner of the SWI, of the NWI, of said Section 25; thence West 1288.6 feet; thence North 200 feet, more or less; thence N 460 W 470 feet, more or less; thence N 430 E 150 feet, more or less; thence Northeasterly 510 feet, more or less, along a 00 501 curve to a point; thence S 611 E 320 feet, more or less; thence East 640 feet, more or less; thence North 460 feet, more or less; thence East 210 feet, more or less; thence South 1321 feet to the point of beginning. All of the above described property is located on the East side of Highway 71 in the vicinity of Stearns Street and Joyce Street and extends South of Mud Creek. WHEREAS, at a meeting on March 16, 1971, the public hearing was continued and after reviewing additional staff recommendations the Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on amending the petition of A W Realty Company for rezoning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That an ordinance be adopted for the purpose of rezoning the following hereinafter described property known as Tract 1, Tract 1-A, Tract 2, Tract 3, Tract 3-A, Tract 3-B, Tract 4, and Tract 5. TRACT 1: That the following described property in Tract 1 be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to I-1, Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial District, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the SWI, of the NWI, of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W and a part of the SEW of the NEI, and a part of the NEI, o£ the SE4 of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SVI corner of the NWI, of said Section 25; thence S 67° 30t W 460 feet, more or less; thence South 230 feet, more or less; thence S 84° W 300 feet, more or less; thence North 650 feet, more or less; thence curving Northeasterly 650 feet, more or less, along a 4° 181 curve; thence S 461 E 470 feet, more or less; thence South 200 feet, more or less; -4 - thence West 140 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 1-A: That the following described property in Tract 1-A be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and C-2, Thoroughfare CommerciAl District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the NE� of the SE4 and a part of the SE4 of the NE� of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30•-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 750 feet West of the SE corner of the SES of the NE� of said Section 26, thence North 210 feet, more or less; thence curving Southwesterly along a 40 18' curve 450 feet, more or less, to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 71; thence S 0° 46' E 240 feet along said right -o£ -way; thence S 70 46' W 202.2 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 0° 46' E 175.3 feet along said right -of -bray; thence N 840 E 538 feet, more or less; thence North 440 feet to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 2: That the following described property in Tract No. 2 be rezoned from R-1, Low Density Residential District, and A-1, Agricultural District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the NE� of the NE4 and a part of the SE� of the NE1 of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30•W, and a part of the Wk of the N'.1and a part of the SWw of the Ndil; of Section 25, T -17-N, R -306-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 535 feet East, more or less, and 50 feet North, more or less, of the SW corner of the NW4 of the NW4 of said Section 25; thence curving Northwesterly 1204 feet, more or less, along a 31 42' curve; thence N 33° W 260 feet, more or less; thence North- westerly 403 feet, more or less, along a 11° curve to a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 71; thence S 0°'46' E 205.9 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 400 40' W 113.4 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 490 50' W 181.2 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 3° 49' W 125.4 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 10 41' W 700.7 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 00. 46' E 400.0 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 100 33' W 204.0 feet along said right-of-way; thence S 0° 46' E 560.0 feet along said right-of-way to a point which is 115 feet North of the South line of the NEI' of said Section 26; thence Northeasterly 1100 feet, more or less, along a 4° 18' curve; thence N 430 E 150 feet, more or less; thence Northeasterly 960 feet, more or less, along a 0° 50' curve to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 3: That the following described property in Tract 3 be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District. is -5 - LEGAL A part of the NEI, of the NEI, of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, and a part of the NWI, of the NW -14 of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which is 170.0 feet South of the Northwest corner of Section 25,, -said -,point beingzon�thea.ceriterline of Stearn Road; thence.South 484.6-feet;'thence East 500.0 feet; th6nce'South 575.0 feet, more or less; thence curving.Northwesterly 1204.0 feet, more or les, along a 30 42' curve which has a radius of 1550 feet; thence North 33° West 260.0 feet; thence Northwesterly 403.0 feet along a 110 curve which has a radius of 525.0 feet, to a point on the Easterly right-of-way of U. S. Highway 71, said point also being on the centerline of Stearn Road; thence East 935.5 feet along the centerline of Stearn Road to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 3-A: That the following described property in Tract 3-A be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the NEI, of the NWI, of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of said NEI,, of the NWI, of Section 25; thence West 1233.7 feet; thence North 1320 feet to the North line of • the said forty acre tract; thence East 1233.7 feet; thence South 1320 feet to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 3-B: That the following described property in Tract No. 3-B be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-0, Residential Office District, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the North half of the NWI, of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which is 1400.0 feet East and 654.12 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Section 25; thence South 642.68 feet, more or less; thence West 580.3 feet; thence curving Northwesterly 318.0 feet along a 3° 42' circular curve having a radius of 1550 feet; thence North 575.0 feet, more or less; thence East 900.0 feet, to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 4: That the following described property in Tract No. 4 be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, to C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, LEGAL A part of the 1.12 of the NWI, of Section 25, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 111.07 feet West of the NE corner of the SW,i-, -6 - of the N9I of said Section 25; thence West 370 feet, more or less; thence Northwesterly 318 feet, more or less, along a 3° 421 curve to a point; thence Southwesterly 450 feet, more or less, along a ot 00 50' curve; thence S 610 E 320 feet, more or less; thence East 640 feet, more or less; thence North 460 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. TRACT NO. 5: That the following described property in Tract No. 5 be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, and R-1, Low Density Residential District, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A part of the SJ of the NWI of Section 25, T -17-N, R-30-11, and a part of the SEI of the NEI of Section 26, T -17-N, R -30-W, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which is 98.93 feet East of the SE corner of the SWI of NWI of said Section 25; thence West 1288.6 feet; thence North 200 feet, more or less; thence N 46, W 470 feet, more or less; thence N 43° E 150 feet, more or less; thence Northeasterly 510 feet, more or less, along a 00 50f curve to a point; thence S 611 E 320 feet, more or less; thence East 640 feet, more or less; thence North 460 feet, more or less; thence East 210 feet, more or less; thence South 1321 feet to the point of beginning. SECTION 2. That the above described property be rezoned from A-1, Agricultural District, R-1, Low Density Residential District, and C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, to I-1, Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial District, C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial District, R-2, Medium Density Residential District, and R-0, Residential Office District, so petitioners may develop a large scale complex of commercial, industrial, office, medical and multi -family projects, architecturally integrated into a total community concept. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of March , 1971. APPROVED: ROY CLINTON, CHAIRMAN :0 RESOLUTION PC 14-71 A RESOLUTION BY THE FAYETTEVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THAT THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AIM PROPOSED ZONING PLAN FOR THE CENTER SQUARE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN CONFORMS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE CITY PLAN AND ZONING ORDI- NANCE OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, WHEREAS: The Urban Renewal Plan and proposed Zoning Plan for the Center Square Urban Renewal Project in Fayetteville, Arkansas was reviewed by the Fayetteville City Planning Commission at their regular monthly meeting held on the 16th day of March, 1971; and WHEREAS: A majority of the members of the Fayetteville City Planning Commission were present at the meeting; and WHEREAS: The Urban Renewal Plan shows the general location of streets, residential areas, office and commercial areas, public areas, and renewal actions; and . WHEREAS: The Zoning Plan shows boundaries for proposed zoning districts within the Center Square Urban Renewal Project. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE FAYETTEVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS: 1. That the Urban Renewal Plan for the Center Square Urban Renewal Project in Fayetteville, Arkansas conforms with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Fayetteville. 2. That the proposed Zoning Plan and timing of changes conforms with the Fayetteville Zoning Ordinance and Zoning District Map as amended. Adopted by the Fayetteville City Planning Commission, Fayetteville, Arkansas this 16th day of March , 1971. ATTEST: I I I 11 Fayetteville, 0 Planning Commission City Planning Commission Arkansas