Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-08-04 MinutesMINUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING The Fayetteville Planning Commission met at 4:00 P.M., Tuesday, August 4, 1970, in the Directors Room of the City Administration Building, Fayetteville, Arkansas, Members Present: Ernest Jacks, Dr. Walter Brown, Helen Edmiston, Clark McClinton, Byron Boyd, Morton Gitelman, Dr. James Mashburn, Members Absent: Roy Clinton, Al Donaubauer. Others Present: John Murphy, Walter Niblock, Herb Christner, Larry Wood, Jim Tidwell, Jim Brock, Chairman Clark McClinton called the meeting to order. The first item on the agenda was a review of the expansion plans of Wood Avenue Baptist Church, 1225 Wood Avenue. The church is located in the R-2, Medium Density Residential District, Use WOOD AVENUE BAPTIST CHURCH Unit 4, Cultural and Recreational Facilities, are permissible onExpansion appeal to the Planning Commission. John Murphy represented the appeal. He stated they desire to add classrooms on the West or back side of the building. They now have 31 parking spaces developed. There is ample room for additional spaces at a later date. The setbacks for the addition meet the regulations. The lot area is 2 acres. No opposition has been made to the addition. Morton Gitelman asked if there is only one entrance to the parking area; there is. He said the only thing he saw was that the parking in his opinion would be better located farther away from Wood Avenue. Byron Boyd moved the Commission approve the expansion plans of the Wood Avenue Baptist Church; Dr. Brown seconded the motion; and it was approved unanimously. The next item on the agenda was a reopening of the public hearing on the rezoning petition of Red Arrow Land Company, Inc., for roperty located on the West side of Highway 265 and approximately mile North of Highway 16 East from R-1, Low Density Residential District, to R-2, Medium Density Residential District. The petition was filed under,Ordinance No. 1239, but was tabled November 18, 1969. Walter Niblock, Attorney, represented the petition. He stated the zoning is sought in order to build some medium priced housing on the approximately 40 acre tract. Dr. Brown asked if a mobile home park was part of the plans. Mr. Niblock said it was not; the old A-1 zoning would have permitted mobile home parks. He said the applicant's still plan to proceed with the plat on the North portion. Mr. Gitelman said he thought the Commission should see a plat showing plans for the entire area before rezoning. He had no objection to R-2 zoning in that part of town, but felt 40 acres was too much. In discussion, Mr. Niblock was told that they could RED ARROW N0. 3 ; 8-4-70 4. build single family and duplex family dwellings under the present zoning. At this time, they don't know where or how much multiple family units they wish to build. Mr. Niblock and Herb Christner, Engineer, discussed the matter and thought it might be a good idea to work out a total land use plan and come back to the Commission with it, if the Commission was agreeable. Dr. Brown moved that in accordance with this, the Commission retable the rezoning petition until the petitioner has studied further into a development plan when he can ask that the matter be reopened. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion; it was approved unanimously. Mr. Niblock agreed to submit a letter accepting this motion. The next item on the agenda was a report from Morton Gitelman on COMMITTEE REPORT the study conducted by his committee (Larry Wood and Jim Vizzier) Sign and Billboards regarding signs and billboards under Ordinance No. 1747. Mr. Gitelman submitted and read a written report. The last paragraph states, "In summary, the Committee recommends no changes in the setback requirements for billboards in the C-21 I-1, and I-2 districts; that the A-1 Zoning District not be changed to permit Use Unit 24 either as of right or conditionally; and that the Planning Commission hear evidence and decide whether such hardship exists so as to recommend amending the ordinance to provide for a longer period in which to eliminate non -conforming is billboards." Ernest Jacks asked why the committee had not gone into the spacing of billboards. Mr. Gitelman thought the outdoor advertising industry regulates itself on this. Dr. Brown moved that his motion of July 7, 1970, be brought off table. This motion was that the Commission recommend to the Board of Directors that we adhere to the setbacks under Ordinance 1747 with regard to billboards. He amended this motion to have the Commission adopt the committee report submitted by Mr. Gitelman and send this report to the Board of Directors. Helen Edmiston seconded the motion and its amendments. It was approved unanimously. RESOLUTION PC 9-70 Dr. Brown nominated Al Donaubauer as Vice -Chairman. Dr. Mashburn moved that the nominations cease; Dr. Brown seconded the motion. Elect: It was approved and Ma. Donaubauer was elected by acclamation. The next item on the agenda was approval of the Final Plat for the Proposed Butterfield Addition. Mr. Lieberenz stated he had recommended some changes to the Engineer and these should all be BUTTERFIELD ADDITION reflected on the corrected sheet just submitted. Street and Final Plat drainage profiles have not been turned in to the City Engineer yet. A Subdivider's Contract will have to be prepared and entered into. He had discussed this with the Subdivision Committee and they agreed to recommend approval subject to: 1. That the engineer furnish Mr. Mattke satisfactory street and drainage plans and profiles; 8-4-70 -3- 2. Owners into a Subdivider's Contract with the City for completion of improvements. Ernest Jacks moved that the Commission recommend approval subject to the foregoing conditions. Dr. Brown seconded the motion. It was approved unanimously. Mr. McClinton was told that this will provide for Oakcliff and Hilldale to be extended and improved. XXXX}OQQ(X7IX RESOLUTION PC 10-70 Morton Gitelman asked that the City Manager be asked to find a replacement for him, as he will be moving in two weeks. The meeting was adjourned at 5:20 P.M. RESOLUTION PC 9-70 WHEREAS, the City Board of Directors has asked the City Planning Commission to conduct a study of the regulations and requirements for signs and billboards as contained in City Ordinance No. 1747. WHEREAS, at a meeting on August 4, 1970, the City Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the City Board of Directors on the regulations and requirements for signs and billboards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS, SECTION 1. That the City adhere to the setbacks under Ordinance No. 1747 with regard to billboards, and that no changes be made in the setback requirements for billboards in the C-2, I-1, and I-2 Districts. SECTION 2. That the A-1 Zoning District not be changed to permit Use Unit 24, Outdoor Advertising, either as of right or conditionally. SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission hear evidence and decide whether such hardship exists so as to recommend amending the ordinance to provide for a longer period in which to eliminate non -conforming billboards. • SECTION 4. That a report attached hereto and marked "TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Special Committee on Billboard Regulation" is hereby adopted by the City Planning Commission and forwarded to the City Board of Directors. PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th day of August , 1970. APPROVED: Clark McClinton, Chairman U 0 RESOLUTION PC 10-70 WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on Tuesday, August 4, 1970, the City Planning Commission voted to make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on the final subdivision plat known as Butterfield Subdivision submitted by Helen Edmiston and Loris Stanton known as ESCO Development Company, Inc., and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended that because the necessary improvements have not been installed in said subdivision that ESCO Development Company, Inc. enter into and furnish the City with the necessary subdivision contract before the Board of Directors accepts this final subdivision plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. The necessary subdivision contract be executed with the City prior to the Board of Directors accepting the final subdivision plat. SECTION 2. That the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas accept the final plat along with the land dedicated for streets and other public uses in the Butterfield Subdivision described as follows: A part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter, and a part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36 in Township 17 North of Range 30 West, and being more particularly described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the NW corner of the SW Quarter of the SW Quarter of said Section 36, said point of beginning being further described as being the S47 Corner of Oaks Manor Subdivision to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas; thence S89°351E 921.93 feet to the SE Corner of said Subdivision; thence N11°38'E 2122.28 feet; thence S70°E 420.00 feet; thence S120301W 1969.04 feet; thence N89°571W 38.00 feet to a stone monument marking the center of the SW Quarter of said Section 36; thence South 568.04 feet; thence S380431E 85.05 feet along an existing rock wall to the Northwesterly right-of-way of the Old Wire Road; thence along the Northwesterly right-of-way of said Road S51005'W 353.30 feet; thence continuing along said right-of-way S48°34'W 102.69 feet; thence NOO°O9'W 264.55 feet along an old fence line to the South line of the North Half of the SW Quarter of the SW Quarter of said Section 36; thence along the South line of said 20 -acre tract N89°57'W 1014.60 feet to a point on the West side of the SW Quarter of the SW Quarter; thence North 660.00 feet to the point of beginning, and containing in all 40.46 acres, more or less. PASSED AM APPROVED this 4th day of August , 1970. APPROVED: Clark McClinton, Chairman