Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-05-18 Minutes1*16 . - - - . . . .111111. : . . I, : • s . 1 : FIT; Members present: J. Fe Palmer, Suzanne Lighton., Bryan Walker, Ernest Jacks, Wade Finc4er and Allen Gilbert, Aembero absent.: Clark McClinton, Henz7 Shreve and Bill Dalton. ChairmanOthers present: J. A. Vizzier, Planning Consultantoo Walter Niblbck; Betty Siegel. The meeting was called to order by .: minutes .1April 13, 1965, and April 27, 1965., were approved as written and mailed to the Planning Cormiiesion rs, Chairman Palmer askednnthe - Subdivision .uml approvedSuzanne Lighton moved that the final subdivision plat of IEE ADDITION be by .: :..Commission _ :.. that after.: have : . • rr:. that the firAQ plat of said addition be referred to the City Council with the r-'ecommendation.: 1- final (1) Utility easements outside the subdivision not be shown on 1- final plat; (2) Building'setback lines on the cast side be shown as 15 feet and not 10 feet; Bearings 1degreesand minutes . lines which are not at 90* angles be shown; (4) Misspelled words .1 1:India Ink copy of1_ finill plat be correet,�.t. The motion was seconded by Allan Gilbert and passed unanimously. • I motion Suzanne I . 1and secondedthePlanning .111111 : • 1voted to approvethe finalplat ofHILLSIDE ADDITION 1: the street profile is submitted to J. A* Vizzier, Planning.Consultaut,, for that thesignature of theproperty owner on the preliminary plat and that the following corrections are made, and after thecorrections have beenmadethe finalplat of said addition be referred to 1: City Council1 the recommendation 1: 1: final be accepted. (1) Utility easements outside thesubdivision not shown •1 the final plat; 1 pressure gas main andeasement I • shown . IJ 1 boundaries of the subdivision.o (3) Misspelled words •1 .: India1 .1 1: final plat be The NnAlsubdivision plat of'I:1I ARROW ADDITION was discussed. Suzanne . 1 moved that the Plannin• nrm - •t approve the final plat of Y:U ARROW ADDITION subject to the belxm corrections being made and after the necessary have :r made thatthe final plat be referred to the City Councilwith the recommendation that said finalaccepted. The motion s .. >. by Bryan Walker and .::'_. unanimously. Temporary vehicularr • nr.. with a radius of 50 feet be :r.at tra and of Arrowhead r mn- . - are to be noted on the final covenants(3) Notation of plat .0 givenmade on the final plat; (4) Blocks are to be numbers; (5) Area labelled "Future Davleopment" should be labelled "Not I Part of Plat", .n from the corporation and Certificate to cert copy of Resolution is true and correct is to be prepared lettered on the final plat; (7) Misspelled words on India Ink copy are to be corrected.] The preliminary subdivision plat of SMYTHADDITION filed by Richard:r was referred to the Subdivision Committee for studyand . um nd . r on motion by Suzanner .r seconded by Allan Gilbert, the Planninr .m - .r unanimously •.: .. final subdivision plat of TONLYNr 1.+ ADDITION subject to certain corrections being made and after these corrections have :. made thatthe final plat of said addition be referred to the City Council with the rec ndation that said plat be accepted. (1) The 20 foot easement dedicated for street purposes in the northeast • r: subdivision :r... High pressure gas mains and setbacks from easements shown; (3) Areas at thesouth and subdivisionto be given nunbere,s Vicinity map not shown on the final (5) Title be changed to: TOMLYN VALLEY VIEW ADDITION SECTION 11 r�. a.• %• 3.1 and 12 of the ORIGINAL TOMLYN VALLEY 11`ADDITION; renumbered;(7) Misspelled .: on the India ink copy to be corrected; (8) Easement as requested by the power campamy be shown (Lots 81 91 103 3.10 14� 15 w The preliminary subdivision plat of SHIPLOY ADDITION filed by W. G. Shipley and presented to the Planning Office May 14, 1965s was discussed. This preliminary rcluded property owned by only Shipley* Walter Niblock, attorney for Mrs. L. S. Roberts, was present to make know his clientb objection to being left out of tha subdivision plat of Shipley Addition. Mrs. Roberts had purchased property from the Shipleye when it was outside the city limits. Later after the property was annexed to the city additional property was purchased with the understanding that W. G. Shipley would subdivide the property. This was evident by the reference to lots in the proposed Shipley Addition as stated in the abstract. Betty Siegel also made known her objection to the exclusion of her property from the Shipley Addition. Me and her husband had purchased two proposed lots (Ioot 5 and 6) and were prepared to purchase lot'7 and lot 8 as shown in the preliminary subdivision plat su13mitted July 1963 and later resubmitted February 1965, It was reported that Je F. Robin=4 attorney for Thomas Schiewetz, had contacted the Plannin OfficeHe could not be present at the .. meeting, Chairman Palmer referred the preliminary subdivision plat of SHIPIEY ADDITION Springsdated April 16, 1965, to the Subdivision committee, The division into lots of a parcel of land on the south aide of Cato :. was discussed. Susanne _Lighton moved that the Planning Commission Naive the fo divisionplat procedure requirements because the of land is not according to the Subdivision • DDEFINITIONS Article V. A. VAXIANCES, but that the property owner, John Askew, be required to file with the County Recorder an informal plat after the Secretary and/or Chairman of the Plannin Commission has signed . . we Subdivisionseconded by Bryan Walker and passed unanimously. Cecil Ramey's division into lots of a parcel of land on the north side of Bailey Drive was referred to the Committee Programformal action, I I J. A. Vizzier, Planning Consultant, reported to the Plannin Commission that Community Renewal .. had been filed. U.., approval of this Community _. applicationsubmitted. This ,: park studyproblem in Fayetteville and a drainage of Fayetteville. No special camittees were appointed by Chairman Palmer. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:50 p.m. n U Date: