HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-01-28 MinutesThe Fayetteville City Planning Commission met in special session in the City Council
Chambers in the City Administration Building at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 28,
1964.
Members present: Ernest Jacks; Allan Gilbert, Jr.; Clark McClinton and Suzanne
Lighton. Also present were the following: Harold E. Lieberenz, City Building
Inspector; Hugh Dill, petitioner; Sidney P: Davis, Jr., attorney; Clyde McClintock
and his wife; W. C. Rogers, petitioner; James D. Cypert, attorney; Carl Yates,
engineer; Be L. Lewis; H. C. Agee; Clifford Ward; J. 0. Wasson and J. Be Pomfret of
the University of Arkansas.
Members absent& Henry I Shreve.e J. F. Palmer; Bill Dalton; Wade Fincher and Bryan
This special meeting was called to order by Vice chairman Suzanne Lighton who presided
in the absence of Chairman J. F. Palmer. Miss Lighton reported that the purpose of
this special meeting was to hold a public hearing to hear and consider the petition
for rezoning submitted by We C. and Cleada. Rogers, husband and wife, and ,.
petition for rezoning submitted . • Hugh We and Kathryn Dill,, husband and
quorumAlthough a of the Planning Conmd sion was not present at the hearing,
Miss Lighton reported that the hearing would be held and action would be taken at a
later meetings
• The Vice chairman reported a request had been made that the rezoning petition of W.
C. Rogers and Cleada Rogers be heard first due to an appointment of a representative
of Mr. Rogers. Mise Lighton said if the other petitioner, Mr. Hugh W. Dill, had no
objections, Mr. Rogers' petition would be heard first. Mr. Sidney P. Davis, Jr.,
attorney for Hugh W. Dill, reported that his client had no objections.
Suzanne Lighton explained the usual procedure of the public hearings held by the
Planning Commission, MiAs Lighton asked that each person be as brief as possible
when given the opportunity to be heard, The Vice chairman said that each person
who wished to be heard would be and declared that those present who favored the raw
zoning petition of We C. and Cleada, Rogers,, husband and wife,, and wished to be heard
would not be so.
James D. Cypert, attorney for W. C. Rogers, and Carl Yates, engineer for the
petitioner, were present to represent the petitioners and to answer any questions
the interested parties or the Planning Commission might have relative to Mr. Rogers,
proposal.
James Cypert said his clients had requested a zoning change from RrlB Single Family
Residential District and al Open Land District to C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial
District of real estate 300 feet East of the East line of U. S. Highway 71 extending
600 feet East along the South line of Harold Street, thence South for a distance of
1,422 feet, more or less, thence West to a point 300 feet East of the East line of
U. S. Highway 71 and thence in a.Hortherly direction 300 feet from and parallel to
the East line of Us S. Highway 71 to the beginning point. Approximately one half of
• this property petitioned for rezoning is located in a al Open Land District.
The proposed zoning change, as Mr. Cypert pointed out, would not conflict with
surrounding land uses, existing buildings or depreciate property value of
Is adjacent propertys With the exception of one wall area north of Harold Street,, t
area petitioned to be rezoned is adjacent to areas already zoned C�2 or is adjac
to areas owned entirely by the petitioners and is to be developed by the petitionj
as a desirable residential neighborhood.
L:
- - 1 • 11 � 1 - - I
FA
♦114 11= =1 AI• - 1:
11 •Ill I - - 1
Clark McClinton for his own benefit and for the benefit of anyone else interested
read from Zoning Ordinance No. 1239 what was permitted and prohibited in the C-2
Thoroughfare Commercial Zone.
There was nothing more to be added at this point; therefore the opponents of the
petition for rezoning were given the opportunity to speak.
Mr. H. C. Agee, 1315 Stubblefield Road in the Stubblefield Addition east of the
property in question, acted as spokesman for those people living in the Maplecrest
Addition to the north and the Stubblefield Addition to the east. Mr. Agee and
property owners in the two previously mentioned additions were of the opinion that
• the 600 additional feet being requested for rezoning would.devaluate property and
create a traffic problem. Harold Street is not wide enough to satisfactorily serve
as a collector street. The amount of traffic would begreatlq increased with the
residential area to the south and to the east emptying into Harold Street from the
proposed north -south street shown on the drawing presented by W. C. Rogers. The
houses in both additions were built on the assumption the zoning would remain
residential in use.
Mr. Agee said that although these people who lived in the Maplecrest Addition and
the Stubblefield Addition did not favor the rezoning as requested, they were pro-
pared to offer in compromise the rezoning of the property from a point 300 feet east
of the East line of U. S. Highway 71 east along the South side of Harold Street to
Lee Street and if the north -south street shown on the submitted drawing empties into
Harold Street as shown that Harold Street be widened to sufficiently handle the
traffic, but if the northmsouth street dead ends before reaching Harold Street that
only the entrance -be widened. Mr. Agee remarked that all persons felt that such a
compromise was reasonable.
A petition with the signatures of 36 persons who felt that the real estate located
between Highway 71 -North and the -Missouri Road owned by W. C. Rogers should be
developed in such a may that would be of benefit to the area; that the C-2 zone should
not -extend past Lee Street and that streets should not empty into Harold Street was
submitted to the Planning Commission for the records. This petition was attached to
W. C. and Cleada Rogerst petition for rezoning so that the material would readily be
available for public inspection.
• Mr. H. L. Lewis, Jr., 213 County Road (Harold Street), strongly opposed the zoning
change requested. Mr. Lewis said that the proposed C-2 Zone could come (east) back
to the front of his house. She ,proposed street would empty into Harold Street in
front of his house. Mr. Lewis felt that this adjacent C-2 Zone as proposed and
• the north—south street which would feed traffic into Harold Street would devaluate
his property and affect himself or any future buyer. Mr. Lewis remarked he assumed
the people in the Stubblefield and Maplecrest Additions had no objections to the house
which was moved in on the south side of Harold Street across the street from his
home being.usid as a church which is not permitted in the Rr-1B-Single Family
Residential District.
i
If a church were considered without consulting the people, Mr. Be L. Lewis felt that
anything could and would be done. He also remarked that when the subdivisions were
developed they were set back far enough to make an allowance forthe commercial zone
along the highway.
Clifford Ward, 1403 Stubblefield Road, said Mr. Agee bad expressed his feelings
relative to the soning.change.
Clyde McClintock, builder and property owner of real estate within the Maplecrest
Addition, felt that if the zoning were changed for the benefit of the entire city
no one would object, but this proposed zoning change would benefit only one person.
• J. 0. Wasson, 104 Alice Street, was of the opinion that the proposed expansion of
the C-2 Zone should not go any further east than Lee Street.
Ernest Jacks asked W. C. Rogers if any restrictions had been made. Mr. Rogers said
he had not as yet composed any.restructions for the property being considered;
however restrictions were contemplated. Nr. Rogers briefly explained his past
experiences with building and developing both commercial and residential areas.
Mr. Rogers contended that more and more of the businesses of today want areas of
greater depth than the 300 -foot width along U. S. Highway 71 which is too narrow for
a commercial zone to be of meaningful use. The businesses require a great deal of
space for buildings, driveways, parking areas and landscaping. He told those present
how regretful Springdale is today because of its past narrow strip zoning. Mr. Cypert
injected for consideration whether small commercial strips are more attractive to
small or large businesses and which is the moat desirable.
With the objectors' concern of the traffic problem, Mr. Cypert said Mr. Robeers,if
the petition were granted, had consented to dedicate for street purposes 10 feet off
the north side of his property to make Harold Street fifty (50) feet wide. It was
also mentioned that Ralph Stubblefield plans to continue his subdivision farther east
and had proposed to widen Harold Street. This widening of Harold Street and the
proposed east -west street to the south as shown on the plan submitted by W. C. Rogers
would alleviate the traffic problems. Mr. Cypert pointed out that Mr. Rogers owns
additional property to the east and to the south. This additional land would be
developed for residential use; henceforth the streets would be beneficial in several
respects: The residents in the proposed residential development would not have to
depend entirely upon Harold Street as an inlet-outlet since the street to the south
• running east -west and connecting Highway 71 North and the Missouri Road would serve
the same purpose; the residents could use the proposed south street as a means of
entering the commercial area; and Harold Street, therefore, would continue to be used
by those persons now using it.
• Mr. Be L. Lewis had several questions directed to Mr. James Cypert and Mr. W. Co
Rogers concerning why the people in Maplecrest were not considered and given a
buffer zone. A rather lengthy discussion_followed.
Mr. Agee speaking in behalf of those parties whom he represented said his people
still would oppose the rezoning even if Mr. W. C. Rogers provided the restrictions
Mr. Lewis questioned whether or not any restrictions could be made binding on future
property owners. Miss Lighton replied that if the property owner were to put
restrictions upon the property, the restrictions could be made binding, but neither
the Planning Commission nor the City Council can require that such restrictions be
put on the property.
James Cypert said he felt that Mr. Rogers would be willing to work out something
which would be satisfactory to the property owners in the Maplecrest Addition relative
to a buffer zone.
Ernest Jacks wondered if the businesses planned would benefit the subdivisions rather
than the highway traffic. Mr. Rogers said yes* Mr. Jacks questioned if the proper
zone were being petitioned.
Xre James Cypert said he felt that his case had been presented and that there Wmia
nothing else.to be added to his comentse Mr* Cypert said he would be willing
so would Mr# Rogers to meet with the people in the Maplecrest and Stubblefield
Addition inorder to.work out a resonable compromise. With this latter statement
Vice chairman suggested that both parties meet and be prepared to report on the
action at the next Planning Commission meeting which would be Februar7 4.
There being no further discussion from either side on the W. C. Rogers* petition for
rezoning, Suzanne Lighton reported that the rezoning petition of Hugh W. Dill and
Kathryn Dill would be heard. Those present who favored the rezoning petition of
Hugh W. Dill and Kathryn Dill were asked to be heard.
Mr. Sidney P. Davis, Jr., attorney for Hugh W. and Kathryn Dill, told those present
that the petitioners had requested the rezoning of property on Razorback Road.
This property is 170 feet north and south and 217 feet east and west and is more
particularly described as lots 6, 7 and 8 in Block 1 of the Fairground Addition to
the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. This property is presently zoned for Rr2 Two
Family Residential District and Mr. Dill has petitioned to rezone the property to
R.-3 Multi -Family Residential District.
Mro Daviszoning
surrounding land uses because the property is located across -the street from the
University of Arkansas multimofamily apartment dwellings,o the property is within one
half block of the Washington County Fairgrounds and county
is best suited for R�3 zoning to alleviate young married couples and married students'
housing needs,* the general area in question
is becoming multionfamily residential
Davisnature as reflected by the location of the university multionfamily housing apartments,
Mro , or 22 unit apartment house could be erected upon the property
and still meet:the requirements of the zoning ordinance; however Mr. Dili plans to
build a 12 unit apartment house,
•Mr.Universityof the
Jacksa not for the Planning Comnissione Mr* stated that he did not
•
•
LI
he agreed, but he was to present it to the Planning
was at the hearing for information. In the not Mr.
University did believe in the validity of sones and
residents across Razorback Road west have opposed r
ioned that any areas adjacent to the University coni
growth and expansion. .
Commission. Mr. Pomfret said he
Pomfret pointed out that the
not in spot zoning; that the
zonings in the past; and he meat=
erned the University as to
There being no one present to be heard in opposition to the petition and no further
Suzanne havinghearing
been accomplished., the public hearing was adjourned.
Date:
November 5, 1963
• Harry Lewis' building problem was heard. Action taken ............. 44
City Attorney requested to notify D. D. Bailey and Burl Ramey
about selling samller lots from large tracts of land .......... 445 45
Willard Williams'(Marie Starr) lot and building problem on
McClinton Street was heard. Action taken ..................... 45
Minutes of October 8 and October 22 approved ....................... 45
Report regarding employing planner given by Chairman ............... 45
November 12, 1963
Public hearing held on rezoning petition of House-Latrecchia-Cates.
No action taken as quorum eras not present ..................... 46
Public hearing held on Cliff Mills' petition for rezoning. No
action taken as quorum was not present ............ 46, 47
Chairman J. F. Palmer reported on the Arkansas Municipal League
Convention of City Planners and Commissioners ................. 47
November 18, 1963
Public hearing held to consider amendment to zoning ordinance
for automatic zoning to 0-1 of newly annexed lands.
Action deferred ...............................................
48
Rezoning petition of Cliff Mills considered and approved ...........
48, 49
RESOLUTION PC 21-63 ................................................
49
Rezoning petition of House-Latrecchia-Cates approved ...............
492 50
RESOLUTION PC 20-63 ................................................
50
December 3, 1963
Several persons in North Washington Avenue area appeared at
•
meeting because of article in newspaper .......................
51, 52
Minutes of October 31, November 5, November 12 and November 18
approved......................................................
52
Preliminary and final platBof Clay Yoe's subdivision of Part of
Block 8 of Broadview Subdivision approved .....................
52
Loy Kinzer's preliminary plat of Kinvrood Second Addition approved ..
52
Roy Adams preliminary plat approved subject to correction in
legal description 0000
52
Planning Commission recommended closing of an alley which extends
off Gregg Avenue in Block 4 of Wilson -Adams Addition ..........
52
January 28, 1964
Public hearing held to consider the rezoning petition of W. C.
and Cleada Rogers. No action taken ............................ 53, 545 55,
and 56
Public hearing held on rezoning petition of Hugh W. and Kathryn
Dill. No action taken ........................................ 56, 57
February 4, 1964
Meeting postponed because a quorum could not be present ............ 58
February 11, 1964
Minutes of December 3, 1963, meeting approved ...................... 58
Planning Commission acted favorably on rezoning petition of
• Hugh W. and Kathryn Dill ................................... 58
RESOLUTION PC 1-64 ....................................004000060. 58, 59
Rezoning petition of W. C. and Cleada Rogers considered.
• Action taken to rezone the property ::::::::::.::::::::::::::: 591 60, 61
RESOLUTION PC 2-64 61, 62
Public hearing date set for rezoning petitions of Ralph Brophy
and property owners of lots in Park Village Addition ......... 62
February 18, 1964
Minutes of January 28 and February 11 approved with corrections ... 63
Election of officers of the Planning Commission for 1964 00.109010. 63
March 10, 1964
Park Village Addition rezoning petition considered at public
hearing. No action taken until more study is given .......... 64, 65, 66
Public hearing held on James 0. and Mildred Witt rezoning
petition. Action taken ...................................... 65, 66
RESOLUTION PC 3-64 ................................................ 66
J. W. Shepherd's building problem referred to Subdivision
Committee for study .......................................... 66, 67
March 17, 1964
Further consideration and action taken on Park Village Addition
rezoning petition68
RESOLUTION PC 4-64 68
Public hearing held on Ralph Brophy's rezoning petition.
Petition withdrawn by attorney for petitioner ................ 69
Street problem in Bryce Davis' Rolling Hills Addition discussed ... 69
Building problem and street"problem. of J.-W.°.:Shepherd, on'_
• Highivay.71 North_ discussed 0000...6000 ........................ 69, 70
Building problem of Morris Unsell and question of extending
Washington Avenue discussed .................................. 70
Discussion of street widening in Roy Adams subdivision plat
between Hawthorne Street and Prospect Street ...............i. 70
Resolution 844 from City Council on procedures for amendments
to the zoning ordinance.discussed ............................ 70
,Chairman submitted list of committees for the year ......0000...... 71
(Quorum was not present during the entire meeting; therefore no
formal recommendation could be made.)
.April 7, 1964
Minutes of February 18, March 10 and March 17 were approved 0000...
72
Preliminary subdivision plat of Winbaugh Heights approved .........
72
Further discussion of Resolution 8-64 from City Council ...........
72
Committees for the year approved ..................................
72
Morris Unsell's building and street problem considered and action
taken by the Planning Commission .............................
72, 73
Sketch of preliminary plats of W. C. Rogers Addition and Oaks
Manor Addition presented .....................................
73
Action taken on question of widening street in Roy Adams
Subdivision ..................................................
73
Preliminary subdivision plat of Rolling Hills Addition approved ...
73
Sketch of Coger Addition accepted .................................
73
No recommendation made on W. G. Shipley Addition ..................
73
Planning Commission discussed recommending vacant building on
• Trenton Boulevard and North College Avenue be razed. To
consider further .............................................
73
• April 14, 1964
Public hearing held on Dr. R. E. Clack's rezoning petition ........
Rezoning petition of J. A. and Frances Russell heard ..............
Recommendation made on Dr. R. E. Clack's petition ..................
RESOLUTIONPC 5-64 ................................................
Parking problem on Meadow Street discussed and action taken
RESOLUTIONPC 6-64 ................................................
Recommendation made on J. A. and Frances Russell's petition
RESOLUTION PC 7-64 ................................................
Future hearing dates set to be held May 5 (rezoning of property
west on Highway 71 South) and May 12 (rezoning petition of
Ed McClelland and amendment to the zoning ordinance) .........
Chairman to take over duties of secretary while secretary is
on vacation ......................................0.0.00......
•
•
May 5, 1964
Public hearing held on Chamber of Commerce property on west
side of Highway 71 South. Recommendation made ...............
RESOLUTIONPC 844 ................................................
Recommendation made to accept 60 foot strip of land on property
discussed at public hearing for street purposes ..............
Minutes of April 7 and April 14 approved ..........................
May 12, 1964
Public hearing held on rezoning petition of Rhea Segraves and
M. A. McClelland .............................................
Public hearing held to amend Article IX of Ordinance No. 1239 .....
Recommendation made on rezoning petition of Rhea Segraves and
M. A. McClelland ..............................................
RESOLUTION PC 9-64 ................................................
Recommendation made to amend Article IX of Ordinance No. 1239
on the procedure for amendment by City Council members ..40660
RESOLUTION PC 10-64 ...........••.•....••.....•.......••
74
75
75
75
76
76
76
76
77
77
78
79
79
79
80
80
81
81, 82
82
82
May 19,1964
Petition of Tom Feathers for rezoning of Lessie Stringfellow
Read property heard at public hearing. No action taken 0000.. 84, 85
May 22, 1964
Preliminary subdivision plat of W. C. Rogers Subdivision approved.. 86
Preliminary subdivision plat of Oaks Manor Addition approved 0000.. 86
Final subdivision plat of Roy Adams Subdivision presented and
approved ..................................................... 86
Prelindhary subdivision plat of Coger Addition approved ........... 86
J. A. Vizzier talked to Planning Commission about employing a
planner ...................................................... 87
June 9, 1964
Public hearing held on rezoning petition filed by Robert Lee
Curtis. No action was taken ................................. 882 89
Minutes of May 5 and May 12 approved 89
Action deferred on Tom feathers rezoning request for the
Lessie Stringfellow Read property ............................ 89
July 2, 1964
• Further consideration of Tom Feathers petition for rezoning.
Recommendation made 90
RESOLUTION PC 11-64 ............................................... 90, 91
Consideration given to the rezoning petition of Robert Lee
Curtis. Recommendation made on the petition ................. 91
RESOLUTIONPC 12-64 ............................................... 91
July 7, 1964
Discussion on street problems of territory to be annexed. Petition
for annexation filed by Kitchens, Will and Perry. No quorum
present and no action taken .................................. 93
Final subdivision plat of Oaks Manor discussed .................... 93
July 8, 1964
Minutes of May 12, May 22 and June 9 approved .....................
94
Final subdivision plat of Rollings Hills Addition approved 0000....
94
Final subdivision plat of Oaks Manor Addition approved ............
94
W. G. Shipley subdivision plat discussed and referred back to
owner ........................................................
94
Street layout of territory petitioned for annexation by
Kitchens, Will and Perry requested by Planning Commission 0000
94
RESOLUTION PC 13-64 ................................................
94, 95
Mrs. Henry Seay requested consideration be given to street access
problems on property SW of W. C. Rogers Addition .............
95
July 17, 1964
• Public hearing held on rezoning petition of B. C. and Jessie
Snawder. No quorum present and no action taken ..............
96
Further consideration given to street access problem of
Mrs. Henry Seay. No action taken by Planning Commission 0000.
96
July 27, 1964
Recommendation made on B. C. and Jessie Snawder's rezoning
petition ..................................................... 98
RESOLUTIONPC 14-64 ...........................................".... 98, 99
Final subdivision plat of W. C. Rogers Addition approved .......... 99
Street problem in annexed area discussed. Glen Will presented
plat of Sunrise Mountain Addition. Street layout approved ... 99
August 11, 1964
Minutes of July 2, July 7, July B, July 17 and July 27 approved ... 100
Street layout in Paul Marinoni's plat of Angus Acres approved 0000. 100
Recommendation made to close Meridth Street in Stubblefield
Addition ..................................................... 100
Discussion on future subdivision of R. T. McClinton's property
north of Cato Springs Road ................................... 100
Goldie England's letter requesting permission to install beauty
shop in R-lA zone given consideration ........................ 100, 101
Building Inspector to call no more meetings until city employs
planning consultant .......................................... 101
• August 17, 1964
Deed from Doyle Brooks for street dedication and extension of
Hillcrest Avenue accepted 0000 ......................0.00.0.... 102
September 28, 1964
• Minutes of August 11 and August 17 approved .......................
Final subdivision plat of Sunnydale Addition filed by Richard
and Kay Coger approved ........................................
Preliminary subdivision plat of Angus Acres approved ..............
Final subdivision plat of Winbaugh Heights approved ...............
Preliminary subdivision plat of Virginia Hills filed by James
R. Hale discussed and referred to Subdivision Committee ....
J. A. Vizzier reported on organizational progress being made in
planning office ..............................................
•
•
103
103
103
103, 104
104
104
October 13, 1964
Preliminary subdivision plat of Virginia Hills Addition approved .. 105
Final subdivision plat of Replat of Blocks 2 and 4 in Elmwood
Addition approved ............................................ 105
Recommendation on closing of Meridth Street in Stubblefield
Addition alearified.......................................... 1051 106
Sketch of Leeson Clark's proposed subdivision presented and
discussed .................................................... 106
J. A. Vizzier reported on trip to Fort Worth and plans for
recertification of the Workable Program ...................... 106
Chairman of Housing Code Committee reported on committee's
progress ..................................................... 106
November 3, 1964
Hearing held on petition presented by Monroe Laner for rezoning
of property on Rock Street. No quorum present ............... 107
November 5, 1964
Recommendation made on petition filed by Monroe Laner for rezoning
property on Rock Street ...................................... 108
RESOLUTION PC 15-64 ............................................... 108
Petition for dlosing certain streets and an alley in Rochier
Heights Addition discussed and recommendation made ........... 109
RESOLUTION PC 16-64 ............................................... 109
November 10, 1964
Report given on progress of Housing Code Committee by its Chairman.
Action on proposed amendment of zoning regulation for zoning of
annexed territory reviewed ...................................
Up to date report on action taken on mobile home parks given ......
Street standards within subdivision regulations discussed .........
Preliminary subdivision plat of LeMon Clark's Tomlyn Valley
View Addition and the plat of Country Club Estates were
referred to Subdivision Committee. Closing of Haddon
street referred to Subdivision Committee, also. ..............
November 17, 1964
Public hearing held on James Sanders' petition for rezoning.
No recommendation was made ...................................
Haddon Street recommended to be closed ............................
RESOLUTION PC 17-64 ...............................................
Humphrey Heasty presented problem on street width of street
west of Old Wire Road and recommendation made ................
RWOJ
ll0
110
110, ill
011
112, 113, 114
113
113
113, 114
•
•
•
LePion Clark's preliminary subdivision plat of Tomlyn Valley
View Addition to be returned to engineer ......................
114
December 15,.1964
Public hearing held on Planning Commission's
Minutes of November 3, November 5, November 10 and November 17
approved .....................................................
115
Public hearing held on rezoning petition of McIlroy Bank.
and on south side
Recommendation made ..........................................
115, 116
RESOLUTION PC 18-64 ...............................................
116
Preliminary plat of Letson Clark's Tomlyn Valley View Addition
approved .....................................................
116, 117
Final subdivision plat of Virginia Hills Addition approved ........
117
Paul E. Sullins lot division problem discussion and action taken ..
117
Recommendation made to accept 40 foot street west off the Old
Minutes of December 15, 1964, approved ............................
Wire Road ....................................................
117
Report given from Chairman of Housing Code Committee ..............
2.18
February 2, 1965
Public hearing held on Planning Commission's
petition for re-
zoning property in Meadowlark Addition
and on south side
of Cato Springs Road .........................................
119,
120, 122
Public hearing held on rezoning petition of
McClinton Brothers ....
120
Minutes of December 15, 1964, approved ............................
120
Discussion had on regular annual meeting ..........................
121
By -Laws of Planning Commission to be amended
......................
121
Preliminary subdivision plat of Red Arrow Addition approved .......
121
Corrected preliminary subdivision plat of W.
G. Shipley Addition
requested by Planning Commission .............................
121
Otis Stobaugh's building problem on Lot 4 of
Kenilworth Place
referred to Subdivision Committee ............................
121
Recommendation made on rezoning petition of
McClinton Brothers ....
122
RESOLUTIONPC 1-65 ................................................
122
February 12, 1965
Recommendation made on Planning Commission's
petition for rezon-
ing property in Meadowlark Addition and
on south side of
Cato Springs Road ............................................
1232
124, 125
RESOLUTIONPC 2-65 ................................................
1251
126
February 16, 1965
Discussion had on need for action on housing ordinance ............ 127
Minutes of February 2, 1965, approved ............................. 127
By -Laws proposed amendment discussed and approved ................. 127
Officers for Planning Commission elected .......................... 127
W. G. Shipley's preliminary subdivision plat discussed ............ 128
March 2, 1965
Minutes of February 12, 1965, and February 16, 1956, approved ..... 129
Report on W. G. Shipley Addition not ready ........................ 129
No report made on Otis Stobaugh's building problem ................ 129
Preliminary subdivision plat of Hillside Addition returned to
subdivider for revision ...................................... 129
Preliminary subdivision plat of Eastwood Addition referred back
to Subdivision Committee ..................................... 130