HomeMy WebLinkAbout1959-11-20 Minutes• MINUTES OF THE
FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING C014MISSION MEETING
OF NOVEMBER 20, 1959
The Fayetteville Planning Commission met in special
session at 7:30 p.m. at the office of E. E. Gose, with
George Caudle, Chairman, presiding and other members present
being E. E. Gose, Hugh Stubblefield, Clay Yoe, Paul Young, Jr.,
Garland Wheeler and Suzanne Lighton. Raymond Nelson of the
University's Planning Division also was present.
Mr. Caudle reported about the problem of Mr. Paul Psevy's
proposed construction of a building on a lot in his Meadow
Vale Addition where there would be a conflict between the
planned building and the suggested location of a street
under the City's Major Street Plan. The problem had been
referred to the Planning Commission by the City Council.
Mr. Caudle said that after the Planning Commission had
approved Mr. Peevy's plan on June 8, 1959, it was realized
that there was a conflict between the plat and a street
as suggested under the Major Street Plan; Mr. Peevy was
notified of this by letter on June 19 and that from dis-
cussion afterward it was believed the problem was worked
out. However, Mr. Caudle said that he had made two trips
today (November 20) to inspect the property, accompanied
by representatives of the City Council's street committee and
by Mr. Peevy, and that the problem could be resolved by
locating the suggested street to run on Ashwood Street in-
stead of on Brower Street. Mr. Caudle ate• had, his
pin._po_is ing of the street would mean the t eev-SS's
lan R not be affected by the Major Street Plan. On
motion of Mr. Gose, seconded by Mr. Wheeler, it was unanimously
voted that this portion of the City's Major Street Plan
be pinpointed to locate the street on Ashwood Street, and
that the Planning Commission recommend that the City survey
the areatIg rtdi,to fix the definite location of this sug-
gested stree to%Razorback Road.
Detailed discussion of the proposed Subdivision Re-
gulations was resumed following similar discussion at pre-
vious meetings on November 3, November 11 and November 18,
at all of which meetings, including the present meeting,
revisions were made in the proposed regulations to incorporate
suggestions made by various groups,. -those made at the for-
mal public hearing and those made by members of the Planning
0
A ,ti
•
CI
1J
Commission. All suggestinns having been considered and
revisions made, it was moved by Mr. Stubblefield, seconded
by Mr. Yoe, and unanimously voted that the Planning Com-
mission approve the proposed Subdivision Regulations and
recommend to the City Council that they be adopted.
There being no further busines% the meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
uza a ghton, Secretary