HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-09-29 - MinutesThe meeting was called
Alexander, in Room 111
PRAB Members Present:
Staff Present:
Media Present:
PRAB
SPECIAL METING
SEPTEMBER 29, 1992
to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairman, Steve
in the City Administration Building.
Alexander, Anderson, Jenkins, Palmer,
Waite
Clark, Cox, Edmonston
Morning News-M.B. Lohr, NWA Times -Rusty
Garrett
Guests Present: Judy Brittenum, Bob Byers, Karen Rollet
BUSINESS:
I. LAKE FAYETTEVILLE EASEMENT
Springdale Water Department wishes to have an easement at
Lake Fayetteville to install a water line along Powell
Street on the northwest corner. Approximately 200 feet
of water line will be installed to serve .Springdale
residents.
MOTION:JENKINS/EINERT
The PRAB recommends to approve the request with
endorsement from the Environmental Study Center
personnel.
MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY 4-0
II. WALKER PARK DISCUSSION
Alexander- Glenn Sowder asked for me to let the PRAB
know his feelings. He wished for us to
look at other options to meet the needs
of baseball and soccer for .,the next 20
years. I think maybe we should consider
other property, too.
Jenkins -
I do not agree. This baseball group is
not as competitive as others, they just
need to have a centralized location. We
have already put lots of cost into Walker
Park. It would be a waste of money to
seek other places for baseball now.
Soccer also needs more fields there. We
are not going to come up with a field
without any trees. Just because I love
kids doesn't mean I don't love birds and
foxes. I am past 50 years of age and I
don't need baseball fields for myself.
PRAB Page 2
There are places I can go to see birds
beside here. People that don't want
anything done are closing their eyes to
the other places in Fayetteville such as
Lake Fayetteville, Lake Sequoyah, and
Lake Wilson. They say we don't have
nature places.
Alexander - Sowder thought our projection would be
short of reality. I think they have a
feeling baseball includes all ages, not
just six throughtwelve year olds. I do
agree we might be underestimating what is
happening to Northwest Arkansas.
Jenkins - I wish our city could get more industry
in here for a bigger tax base and afford
more. We might not have to have as many
volunteers. I know 1.3 million sounded
like a lot of money, but that included
other things besides just the baseball
and soccer fields.
Alexander -
Einert -
Jenkins -
Einert -
We have three alternatives
1. We can stop the process and look
elsewhere.
2. We can proceed as planned.
3. We can proceed as planned and follow
up with ongoing research for our needs in
the next 20 years.
We will either have to continue on or
clean up the nature area and leave as is.
It was purchased for development. I
don't think it can become a nature
preserve. How about the possibility of
the separation of the baseball and soccer
fields?
We are looking at immediate needs. If
baseball gave our soccer our fields, it
would only make them about two fields.
The baseball lights are already there.
It would be a waste to move everything.
What about the land across from Walker on
the south? Would that have been a good
spot?
Jenkins -
PRAB Page 3
The land looks good from the road because
fill has been added. Actually there is a
30 foot drop. It sold for $60,000
because it is not suitable.
Alexander - How much would it cost to move all of
soccer?
Anderson -
Jenkins -
It depends on how much topsoil would have
to be added to the land. The last soccer
field cost between. $50,000 and $70,000.
The irrigation was an additional $3,000
or $4,000. We have talked about the
possibility of having practice fields at
Combs and saving wear and tear on fields
at Walker. This way they would be
suitable for games and tournaments.
These fields won't suddenly be worthless
if we outgrow them. I have spent time,
thinking of Combs and Industrial Park as
sites. We have to face the fact that we
have four soccer fields and two more is
six. To add six elsewhere would cost
much more.
I think the people against the fields
would be against them anywhere they were
located.
Alexander - Gregory Park is a nature park, and is a
perfect example of under utilization.
The more picnic tables and such that we
add causes more utilization.
Palmer - What percentage of the 2500 acres of park
land that we. have are athletic fields?
Edmonston - I am currently doing a report on this.
We have approximately 20 acres of
athletics, including tennis courts and
the swimming pool. We have approximately
1700 acres of nature, including Gregory
Park, Lake Fayetteville, Lake Sequoyah,
Lake Wilson, Finger Park, Crossover Park,
and Gulley Park.
Palmer -
People say we emphasize playgrounds and
athletics. They don't do their homework.
There was a motion stating what we would
use the land for.
Einert -
Palmer -
Anderson -
Palmer -
Anderson -
Jenkins -
Edmonston -
Jenkins -
PRAB Page 4
There is also the money issue. I don't
think the people are against athletics.
If we found a perfect meadow, they
probably would not object.
Our main objective is location. This
property is adjacent to the current
facilities, and that is why we want this.
It is really not a great area to build
on. I can't support this plan because it
is not going to be as long term as I feel
is needed.
I disagree. I talked to the baseball
association. They will be happy with
this plan. It is a compromise.
I don't think it is the wisest investment
All of the money won't come from the
City. Baseball wants to have
fundraisers.
Has it been said that the City will pay
totally for the park?
The current soccer fields were paid by
private funding, community development,
and green space.
I think all we are doing is asking for
approval to complete this plan in the
future. We may not have it all for quite
awhile. It gives us a goal to work
towards.
Einert - We have to make a decision of going
forward with this or not.
Anderson - I think a lot of time and effort have
gone into this property for the best for
everyone concerned. It would have been
better had it been flat, but it's not.
MOTION:JENRINS/ANDERSOt
The PRAB accepts and recommends to the City Board of
Directors to approve the preliminary master plan
presented by Callans and Associates for the design of the
Walker Park Expansion project.
NOTION APPROVED 5-1 (PALMER NAY)
Einert -
Edmonston -
Anderson -
Waite -
PRAB Page 5
Do we have cost estimates yet? The two
main concerns from the public seem to be:
1. money 2. why are we going so fast?
I don'tthink it is going fast. We have
had requests for years from these sports
organizations. We finally purchased the
land and have owned it for six months.
These people have been on hold for years.
If we don't adopt it now, we are going to
keep rehashing the public meetings.
I don't think they realize how much that
we have put into this. It in fresh in
our minds. Why should we spread it over
two years or so? If we had ten more
public meetings, it would be the same
thing.
There was less room for compromise last
night. If we delay, what are we waiting
for? It has taken us a long time to get
here. If we wait, what are we going to
do?
Alexander - I am for the proposal because of what
Connie said.
Waite - If we waited for more public meetings, do
you feel it would change your view?
Einert - When it this going to the City Board
meeting?
Clark - We are on the October 6 agenda.
Edmonston - It is sad to give up things. We "do the
rightsthings, for the right reasons."
Waite - We are not going to satisfy everyone. We
have to compromise.
Jenkins - I think the silent majority will speak
out if needed.
These phases and cost estimates were presented by Callans
and Associates. See attached: Note that cost estimates
do not include renovating the house for the senior
citizens or the cost of building a park maintenance
building.
PRAB Page 6
OTHER BUSINESS:
The next meeting will be Monday, October 5, to meet with
Northwest Regional Planning Office for an update of the
park master plan.
The meeting adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
Minutes approved:
Secretary