Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2006-11-21 - Minutes - Archive
MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 21, 2006 REGULAR MEETING OF THE • HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS The Housing Authority of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas met in Regular Session at 8:00 a.m., November 21, 2006, in the City Administration Building, Room 326, Fayetteville, AR. Betty Turner, Chairperson called the meeting to order at approximately 8:00 a.m. Commissioners Present: Janet Richardson, Deborah Olsen and Betty Turner Commissioners Absent: Richard Royal Others Present: Fredia Sawin and Laura Higgins (Fayetteville Housing Authority) Old Business A. Update of Seven Hills $150,000 Permanent Supportive Housing Grant Proposal - Ms. Sawin updated the board and handed out the plans done by Ledford • Engineering on the proposed site at Morgan Manor. There would be approximately 28 additional units built at an estimated cost of around $1,500,000.00. Ms. Sawin explained that possible funding could be sought through ADFA, Fannie Mae or other sources and the board agreed that it looked very promising. Ms. Sawin just requested approval to submit the task order to Quadel Consulting. Motion was made by Ms. Olsen to move up Item H, Approval of Resolution No. 782 Authorizing the Spending of Funds for the Fayetteville Housing Authority's Hired Consultant Fees in Reference to Task Order #1, seconded by Ms. Richardson and carried unanimously. Ms. Sawin reviewed the task order with board members and a motion was made by Ms. Olsen to accept Resolution No. 782, seconded by Ms. Richardson and carried unanimously. (At the end of the meeting Ms. Sawin advised that she will call Jim Slater at the HUD office to check on the status of the $150,000. grant from Seven Hills). B. Further Discussion of Preference for Homeless Individuals and Families as Requested in Reference to the Violence Against Women Act -Ms. Sawin will keep this on the agenda until the regulations are finalized by HUD. New Business A. Approval of Minutes of Previous Annual Meeting -Ms. Olsen motioned to accept the October 17, 2006 Minutes, seconded by Ms. Richardson and carried unanimously. 0 B. Approval of October 2006 Financial Statements -Ms. Richardson motioned to • accept the October 2006 Financial Statements, seconded by Ms. Olsen and carried unanimously. D. Discussion to Possibly Change the Time and Place of Future Board Meetings -This item will be moved to the next regular meeting due to the absence of board members. Ms. Richardson asked those present to think about this and finalize it at the next regular board meeting. E. Election of New Housing Authority Commissioner -Ms. Sawin advised that only one application had been submitted for the open commissioner position. Due to Mr. Royals' absence, Ms. Richardson requested that a special meeting be called to either vote on the one application submitted or to possibly re -advertise after discussing the issue with Mr. Royal. Ms. Richardson so motioned, seconded by Ms. Olsen and carried unanimously. This special meeting will be conducted either November 27`h, or November 28`h, 2006. Ms. Sawin will check and advise the remainder of the board for date, time and location. F. Approval of Resolution No. 780 Authorizing the Submission of Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) Certification for Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/06 -Ms. Sawin explained that this is the annual report for the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program that is submitted to HUD. Ms. Richardson motioned to accept Resolution No. 780, seconded by Ms. Olsen and carried unanimously. G. Approval of Resolution No. 781 Authorizing the Submission of Public Housing Management Assessment Program (PHAS) Certification for Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/06 -Ms. Sawin explained that this is the annual report for the Public Housing • Program that is submitted to HUD. Ms. Olsen motioned to accept Resolution No. 781, seconded by Ms. Richardson and carried unanimously. I. Executive Directors Report- Ms. Sawin reviewed her written report. Ms. Olsen announced that the Christmas Party for the tenants will be held on Monday, December 11, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. and invited the board members to attend. Ms. Richardson requested that the next regular board meeting be moved to Monday, December 18, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. as she will be going out of town after this date. Ms. Sawin will check with the City of Fayetteville to see if the room will be available that date. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Chairpergon ATTEST: 4 0 0 FAYETTEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY #1 North School Ave. Fayetteville, AR 72701-5928 PH: (479)521-3850 FAX: (479)442-6771 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT November 16, 2006 1. The Lewis Plaza Play Ground Project is completed. The ribbon cutting -dedication ceremony was held on November 1st. The next CDBG Project is the Willow Heights Head Start room addition. This new room will be used as a therapy room for handicapped children who are enrolled in the Head Start Program. The plans and bidding for this project are in the final stages. 2. Public Housing has 3 vacancies, 0 at Willow Heights, 1 at Lewis Plaza, 2 at Hillcrest Towers, and 0 at Morgan Manor. The Section 8 Program is full. The • Shelter Plus Care Program has 6 participants and the Disaster Voucher Program has 7 participants. 3. The development plans created by Ledford Planning and Engineering for the Morgan Manor excess land and the eight supportive housing units, are enclosed in this months Board Meeting Packets. I received these drawings last Thursday (November 9th). With the Holidays and end of the year book work, there was not enough time for a Special Meeting. Since it was only one week before our Regular Board Meeting, I opted to put it on the agenda and cover it then. 4. The Commissioner opening was publicized and one application was submitted to the City of Fayetteville's City Clerks office. I e-mailed a copy of this application to each of you, just in case you did not get the copy, one has been provided in your packet. The election for a new Board member has been placed on the agenda. Is � I I I I I I I I I I .I I C ---------------------C ■ | SCHEMA nC SITE PLAW MORGAN _•_ ,, �\ F�FAY��� ul I ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS PRELIMINARY _r / 9 �!m #{ f a . |=72 |; E' « z E| _[ . ! .,..& � kk)k | SCHEMA nC SITE PLAW MORGAN _•_ ,, �\ F�FAY��� ul I ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS PRELIMINARY _r / 9 �!m #{ f a . � _[ � I• • 0 name Are you a Fayetteville registered voter! Yes K3. No ❑ 1. What are your qualifications for serving on this committee, Including education and expertise in the subject matter? 2. Why would you like to be considered for appointment to this committee? A; r of 1-4& PWARC Baa 140 tS 4-obi`rok Z References; U)04M5. 4::A#, I FO 443 -(A52 Address— F ° ' Phone 111Z0 6n pVAIIo, Al -/4 -741 -5Z) -L655 How did you hear about the opening(s)? NWA Times ❑ Free Weekly ❑C�AA7ccessfayettrAfffe org ❑I ` Government Channel ❑ Chamber of Commerce C1 Other �.w OST-VLL"A2bSC>jJ Please fill out application COMPLETELY and return to: City Clerk's Division 113 W. Mountain Street, Fayetteville 72701 Fax to 718-7695 or Email to city_clerk &i.fayettevilh:.ar us If you have any questions call 676-8323 Office Use Only :.: Term Begins - Appointed: .. . Term Expires:.. -... .Replaced:. , OCT 162006 Terminated:Resigned: CITY OFFAYETTEvCE RESOLUTION NO. 780 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF SECTION 8 MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (SEMAP) CERTIFICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING 9/30/06 WHEREAS, The Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority is required to review the Annual SEMAP Certification and authorize the submission of the SEMAP Certification and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority did review the attached SEMAP Certification for Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/06. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY: That the Executive Director of the Housing Authority is authorized to execute the attached SEMAP Certification for Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/06. • PASSED AND APPROVED THIS it OF 2006 2006 ATTEST: SECRETARY • THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FAYETT�EVII(LLE, ARKANSAS �! CHAIRPERPON RESOLUTION N0, 780 Section 8 Management Assessment U.S. Department of Housing OMB Approval No. 2577-0215 (exp. 8131/2003) and Urban Development Program (SEMAP) Office of Public and Indian Housing Certification • Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 12 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. This collection of information is required by 24 CFR sec 985.101 which requires a Public Housing Agency (PHA) administering a Section 8 tenant -based assistance program to submit an annual SEMAP Certification within 60 days after the end of its fiscal year. The information from the PHA concerns the performance of the PHA and provides assurance that there is no evidence of seriously deficient performance. HUD uses the information and other data to assess PHA management capabilities and deficiencies, and to assign an overall performance rating to the PHA. Responses are mandatory and the information collected does not lend itself to confidentiality. Instructions Respond to this certification form using the PHA's actual data for the fiscal year just ended. Fayetteville Housing Authority 109/30/2006 Check here if the PHA expends less than $300,000 a year in Federal awards Indicators 1 - 7 will not be rated if the PHA expends less than $300,000 a year in Federal awards and its Section 8 programs are not audited for compliance with regulations by an independent auditor. A PHA that expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards in a year must still complete the certification for these indicators. Performance Indicators Selection from the Waiting List. (24 CFR 982.54(d)(1) and 982.204(a)) (a) The PHA has written policies in its administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list. PHA Response Yes F✓ No O (b) The PHA's quality control samples of applicants reaching the top of the waiting list and of admissions show that at least 98% of the families in the samples were selected from the waiting list for admission in accordance with the PHA's policies and met the selection criteria that determined their places on the waiting list and their order of selection. PHA Response Yes a No 2. Reasonable Rent. (24 CFR 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(()(7) and 982.507) (a) The PHA has and implements a reasonable written method to determine and document for each unit leased that the rent to owner is reasonable based • on current rents for comparable unassisted units (i) at the time of initial leasing, (ii) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (iii) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a 5 percent decrease in the published FMR in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA's method takes into consideration the location, size, type, quality, and age of the program unit and of similar unassisted units, and any amenities, housing services, maintenance or utilities provided by the owners. PHA Response Yes O No 71 (b) The PHA's quality control sample of tenant files for which a determination of reasonable rent was required shows that the PHA followed its written method to determine reasonable rent and documented its determination that the rent to owner is reasonable as required for (check one): PHA Response a At least 98% of units sampled = 80 to 97% of units sampled n Less than 80% of units sampled 3. Determination of Adjusted Income. (24 CFR part 5, subpart F and 24 CFR 982.516) The PHA's quality control sample of tenant files shows that at the time of admission and reexamination, the PHA properly obtained third party verification of adjusted income or documented why third party verification was not available; used the verified information in determining adjusted income; properly attributed allowances for expenses; and, where the family is responsible for utilities under the lease, the PHA used the appropriate utility allowances for the unit leased in determining the gross rent for (check one): PHA Response © At least 90% of files sampled 80 to 89% of files sampled a Less than 80% of files sampled 4. Utility Allowance Schedule. (24 CFR 982.517) The PHA maintains an up -lo -date utility allowance schedule. The PHA reviewed utility rate data that it obtained within the last 12 months, and adjusted its utility allowance schedule if there has been a change of 10% or more in a utility rate since the last time the utility allowance schedule was revised. PHA Response Yes ✓� No a HQS Quality Control Inspections. (24 CFR 982.405(b)) A PHA supervisor (or other qualified person) reinspected a sample of units during the PHA fiscal year, which met the minimum sample size required by HUD (see 24 CFR 985.2), for quality control of HQS inspections. The PHA supervisor's reinspected sample was drawn from recently completed HQS inspections and represents a cross section of neighborhoods and the work of a cross section of inspectors. PHA Response Yes I ,/ I No 6. HQS Enforcement. (24 CFR 982.404) The PHA's quality control sample of case files with failed HQS inspections shows that, for all cases sampled, any cited life-threatening HQS deficiencies were corrected within 24 hours from the inspection and, all other cited HOS deficiencies were corrected within no more than 30 calendar days from the inspection orany PHA -approved extension, or, if HQS deficiencies were not corrected within the required time frame, the PHAstopped housing assistance payments beginning no later than the first of the month following the correction period, or took prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations - for (check one): PHA Response 0✓ At least 98% of cases sampled ElLess than 98% of cases sampled Previous edition is obsolete form HUD -52648 (8/2000) Page 1 of 4 ref. 24 CFR Part 985 7. Expanding Housing Opportunities. (24 CFR 982.54(d)(5), 982.153(b)(3) and (b)(4), 982.301(a) and 983.301(b)(4) and (b)(12)). Applies only to PHAs with jurisdiction in metropolitan FMR areas. Cheek here if not applicable • (a) The PHA has a written policy to encourage participation by owners of units outside areas of poverty or minority concentration which clearly delineates areas in its jurisdiction that the PHA considers areas of poverty or minority concentration, and which includes actions the PHA will take to encourage owner participation. PHAIResponse Yes FV No F7 (b) The PHA has documentation that shows that it took actions indicated in its written policy to encourage participation by owners outside areas of poverty and minority concentration. PHA.Response Yes 0 No F7 (c) The PHA has prepared maps that show various areas, both within and neighboring its jurisdiction, with housing opportunities outside areas of poverty and minority concentration; the PHA has assembled information aboutjob opportunities, schools and services in these areas; and the PHA uses the maps and related information when briefing voucher holders. PHA Response Yes a No (d) The PHA's information packet for voucher holders contains either a list of owners who are willing to lease, or properties available for lease, under the voucher program, or a list of other organizations that will help families find units and the list includes properties or organizations that operate outside areas of poverty or minority concentration. PHA Response Yes 71 No 0 (e) The PHA's information packet includes an explanation of how portability works and includes a list of neighboring PHAs with the name, address and telephone number of a portability contact person at each. PHA Response Yes O No 71 (1) The PHA has analyzed whether voucher holders have experienced difficulties in finding housing outside areas of poverty or minority concentration and, where such difficulties were found, the PHA has considered whether it is appropriate to seek approval of exception payment standard amounts in any part of its jurisdiction and has sought HUD approval when necessary. PHA Response Yes M No 8. Payment Standards. The PHA has adopted current payment standards for the voucher program by unit size for each FMR area in the PHA jurisdiction and, if applicable, for each PHA -designated part of an FMR area, which do not exceed 110 percent of the current applicable FMR and which are not less than 90 percent of the current FMR (unless a lower percent is approved by HUD). (24 CFR 982.503) PHA Response Yes F✓ No = Enter current FMRs and payment standards (PS) • 0 -BR FMR 420 1-B 443 554 807 R FMR 2 -BR FMR 3 -BR FMR 4 -BR FMR 829 PS 420 PS 443 PS 554 PS 807 PS 829 If the PHA has jurisdiction in more than one FMR area, and/or if the PHA has established separate payment standards for a PHA -designated part of an FMR area, attach similar FMR and payment standard comparisons for each FMR area and designated area. 9. Annual Reexaminations. The PHA completes a reexamination for each participating family at least every 12 months. (24 CFR 982.516) PHA Response Yes E71 No 10. Correct Tenant Rent Calculations. The PHA correctly calculates tenant rent in the rental certificate program and the family rent to owner in the rental voucher program. (24 CFR 982, Subpart K) PHA Response Yes✓1 No a 11. Precontract HOS Inspections. Each newly leased unit passed HOS inspection before the beginning date of the assisted lease and HAP contract. (24 CFR 982.305) PHA Response Yes 171 No El 12. Annual HOS Inspections. The PHA inspects each unit under contract at least annually. (24 CFR 982.405(a)) PHA Response Yes Y] No 13. Lease -Up. The PHA executes assistance contracts on behalf of eligible families for the number of units that has been under budget for at least one year. PHA Response Yes Y1 No 11 14a. Family SelfSufiiciency Enrollment. The PHA has enrolled families in FSS as required. (24 CFR 984.105) Applies only to PHAs required to administer an FSS program. Check here if not applicable F✓ PHA Response a. Number of mandatory FSS slots (Count units funded under the FY 1992 FSS incentive awards and in FY 1993 and later through 10/20/1998. Exclude units funded in connection with Section 8 and Section 23 project -based contract terminations; public housing demolition, disposition and replacement; HUD multifamily property sales; prepaid or terminated mortgages under section 236 or section 221(d)(3); and Section 8 renewal funding. Subtract the number of • families that successfully completed their contracts on or after 10/21/1998.) or, Number of mandatory FSS slots under HUD -approved exception form HUD -52648 (8/2000) Previous edition is obsolete Page 2 of 4 ref. 24 CFR Part 985 b. Number of FSS families currently enrolled c. Portability: If you are the Initial PHA, enter the number of families currently enrolled in your FSS program, but who . have moved under portability and whose Section 8 assistance is administered by another PHA Percent of FSS slots filled (b + c divided by a) 14b. Percent of FSS Participants with Escrow Account Balances. The PHA has made progress in supporting family self-sufficiency as measured by the percent of currently enrolled FSS families with escrow account balances. (24 CFR 984.305) Applies only to PHAs required to administer an FSS program. Check here if not applicable PMA Response Yes = No Portability: If you are the initial PHA, enter the number of families with FSS escrow accounts currently enrolled in your FSS program, but who have moved under portability and whose Section 8 assistance is administered by another PHA Deconcentiation Bonus Indicator (Optional and only for PHAs with jurisdiction in metropolitan FMR areas). The PHA is submitting with this certification data which show that: (1) Half or more of all Section 8 families with children assisted by the PHA in its principal operating area resided In low poverty census tracts at the end of the last PHA FY; (2) The percent of Section 8 mover families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operating area during the last PHA FY is at least two percentage points higher than the percent of all Section 8 families with children who resided in low poverty census tracts at the end of the last PHA FY; or (3) The Percent of Section 8 mover families with children who moved to low poverty census tracts in the PHA's principal operating area over the last two PHA FYs is at least two percentage points higher than the percent of all Section 8 families with children who resided in low poverty census tracts at the end of the second to last PHA FY. PHA Response Yes F-1 No 0 If yes, attach completed deconcentration bonus Indicator addendum. I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the above responses under the Section 8 Management Assessment Program (SEMAP) are true and accurate for the PHA fiscal year indicated above. I also certify that, to my present knowledge, there is not evidence to indicate seriously deficient performance that casts doubt on the PHA's capacity to administer Section 8 rental assistance in accordance with Federal law and regulations. Waming: HUD will prosecute false claims and statements. Conviction may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. If U.S.C. 1001, 1010, 1012; 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802) • Executive Director, signature Chairperson, Board of Commissioners, signature Date (mmldd/yyyy) ��/ ,- .�O�p Date (mnVdd/yyyyy) //� Qo (o v The PHA may include with its SEMAP certification any information bearing on the accuracy or completeness of the information used by the PHA in providing its certification. • form HUD -52648 (812000) Previous edition is obsolete Page 3 of 4 ref. 24 CFR Part 985 • • U I Most'Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report As of September 30, 2006 Housing Authority: AR181 Housing Authority September 30, 2006 FYE: Reporting Rate as of September 30, 2006 Page 1 of 7 Download in Excel Print Page Back to Report Program Type Number of 50058s Required Number of 50058s Reported Reporting Rate 2 -Bedrooms ifi} (fo) (%) All Voucher Funded 430 432 100 Programs WASHINGTON COUNTY 1443 Indicator 8: Payment Standards Note:, Indicator 8 is self -certified. This information should be available during any on-site review Fair Market Rents in effect September 30, 2006 and published on October 1, 2005 County 0 -Bedroom 1 -Bedroom 2 -Bedrooms 3 -Bedrooms 4 -Bedrooms BENT ON COUNTY 1420 420 1443 554 807 829 WASHINGTON COUNTY 1443 554 807 1829 https://www l I.hud.gov/pic/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport. asp 10/9/2006 Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Page 2 of 7 Indicator 9: • Annual Reexaminations • E Percent of Families with reexaminations overdue (%) (SEMAP scores zero points when more than 10 percent of reexaminations are more than 2 months 0% overdue) [+] Families with reexaminations overdue https://www I l.hud.gov/pic/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport.asp 10/9/2006 11 Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Indicator 10: • Correct Tenant Rent Calculations • • Page 3 of 7 Percent of Families with incorrect rent calculation (%) 0% (SEMAP scores zero points when more than 2 percent of HA tenant rent calculations are incorrect) [+] Families with incorrect rent calculation(s) https://www 1 I.hud.gov/pic/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport.asp 10/9/2006 I' Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Indicator 11: • Precontract HQS Inspections • • Page 4 of 7 Percent of units that did pass HQS inspection before the beginning date of the assisted lease and HAP contract (%) 100% (SEMAP scores zero points when fewer than 98 percent of newly leased units pass the HQS inspection) [+� Families where HQS inspection did not pass before lease and HAP contract https://wwwl t.hud.gov/pic/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport.asp 10/9/2006 Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Indicator 12: • Annual HQS Inspections • Page 5 of 7 Percent of units under contract where annual HQS inspection is overdue (%) (SEMAP scores zero points when more than 10 percent of units under contract are more than 2 months 0% overdue) [+] Families with annual HQS inspections overdue https://www I I.hud.gov/pie/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport.asp 10/9/2006 Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Page 6 of 7 Indicator 13: • lease -Up • • Note:'; Information for Indicator 13 will be populated approximately 105 days after the PHA 's FYE. SEMAP scores zero points when utilization is less than 95 percent (either expenditure of budget authority or lease'up of baseline units) on an annual basis. No Data Available for AR181, SEMAP Indicator 13 https://wwwl I.hud.gov/pie/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport.asp 10/9/2006 Ob • Most Recent Scored SEMAP Indicators Report Page 7 of 7 S Indicator 14: Family Self -Sufficiency Enrollment Note: Indicator 14 is applicable only to PHA with mandatory voucher FSS programs. SEMAP scores zero points if the PHA has filled fewer than 60 percent of its mandatory FSS slots and less than 30 percent of FSS families have escrow account balances. JFamilies Enrolled Number of Number ofPercent of Number of Families with Percent of Families with Mandatory Slots (#) Families Enrolled JFamilies Enrolled (#) (%) Escrow Balances (#) Escrow Balances (%) 0 1 10 1 100 [+] Families enrolled in Voucher FSS Program https://wwwll.hud.gov/pic/Mtcs/Reports/mtcssemapreport.asp 10/9/2006 I• RESOLUTION NO. 781 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (PHAS) CERTIFICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING 9/30/06 WHEREAS, The Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority is required to review the Annual PHAS Certification and authorize the submission of the PHAS Certification and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority did review the attached PHAS Certification for Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/06 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY: That the Executive Director of the Housing Authority is authorized to execute the attached PHAS Certification for • Fiscal Year ending 9/30/06. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS a,.LDAY OF `2006. t • THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS CHAIRPERSON I • View Print Full Submission Management Assessment for Public Housing Agencies View/Print Full Submission PHA Code: AR097 FYE : 09/30 Fiscal Year: 2006 PHA Name: Housing Authority of the City of Fayetteville Submission Type: Submission Status : Draft Page 1 of 5 Inbox I Unit Turnaround I Capital Find I Work Orders I Annual Inspection I Security Econ. Self-Suff Sub -Indicator 1: Vacant Unit Turnaround Time ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT V12400 Total number of turnaround days. 2,754 V12500 Total number of vacancy days exempted for Capital Fund. 0 V12600 Total number of vacancy days exempted for other reasons. 0 V12700 Total number of vacant units turned around and lease in effect in the PHA's immediate past fiscal year. 111 V12800 Average number of calendar days units were in down time. 11.99 V12900 Average number of calendar days units were in make ready time. 7.03 • V13000 Average number of calendar days units were in lease up time. 5.79 V13100 Average Unit Turnaround Days. 24.81 1 https://www1I.hud.gov/H TD_Systems/mass/mass_view-nrint_full_submission.cfm?part... 11/16/2006 Sub -Indicator 2: Capital Fund ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Do you have any open Capital Fund programs(e.g. CGP, CF10000 HOPE VI)(Y/N)? Open = any program that does not have a pre -audit end date or that received a pre -audit end yes date during the fiscal year being assessed. Component 1: Unexpended Funds Over Three Federal Fiscal Years (FFYs) Old Total funds authorized over 3 FFYs old that do not have CF10050 a pre -audit end date or that received a pre -audit end $ 0.00 date during the fiscal year being assessed. Total funds expended over 3 FFYs old that do not have CF10100 a pre -audit end date or that received a pre -audit end $ 0.00 date during the fiscal year being assessed. • CF10200 Unexpended funds to be recaptured (enter dollar amt). $ 0.00 CF10300 Unexpended funds approved by HUD over 3 FFYs old $ 0.00 https://www1I.hud.gov/H TD_Systems/mass/mass_view-nrint_full_submission.cfm?part... 11/16/2006 I • • • View Print Full Submission Page 2 of 5 The date of last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site CF11700 inspection and/or audit related to contract 02/28/2006 administration (include A133 audit). CF11800 The number of findings related to contract administration. 0 CF11900 The number of findings related to contract administration that have been corrected by the PHA. 0 The number of findings related to contract CF12000 administration that the PHA is in the process of 0 correcting. Component 4: Quality of the Physical Work Date of last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site CF12200 inspection and/or audit related to quality of the physical 11/16/2001 work. CF12300 The number of findings related to the quality of the physical work. 0 CF12400 The number of findings related to the quality of the physical work that have been corrected by the PHA. 0 The number of findings related to the quality of the CF12500 physical work that the PHA is in the process of 0 correcting. Component 5: Budget Controls CF12700 Total amount of Capital Funds expended during the PHA fiscal year being assessed. $ 479,866.15 The amount of Capital Funds expended on approved CF12800 work items not subject to budget revisions during the $ 461,258.40 PHA fiscal year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended under budget CF12900 revisions with prior HUD approval during the PHA fiscal $ 18,607.75 year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended under budget CF13000 revisions not requiring prior HUD approval during the $ 0.00 PHA fiscal year being assessed. [rop of Pa e https://www l l .hud. gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfrn?part... 11/16/2006 (enter dollar amt). CF10400 Unexpended funds with time extensions due to reasons $ 0.00 outside of PHA control (enter dollar amt). CF10500 Adjusted total unexpended funds. $ 0.00 Component 2: Timeliness of Fund Obligation CF11100 Total funds authorized for grants over 2 FFYs old. $ 0.00 CF11200 Total funds obligated over 2 FFYs old. $ 0.00 CF11300 Unobligated funds approved by HUD over 2 FFYs old (enter dollar amt). $ 0.00 CF11400 Unobligated funds with time extensions due to reasons outside of PHA control (enter dollar amt). $ 0.00 CF11500 Adjusted total unobligated funds. $ 0.00 Component 3: Adequacy of Contract Administration The date of last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site CF11700 inspection and/or audit related to contract 02/28/2006 administration (include A133 audit). CF11800 The number of findings related to contract administration. 0 CF11900 The number of findings related to contract administration that have been corrected by the PHA. 0 The number of findings related to contract CF12000 administration that the PHA is in the process of 0 correcting. Component 4: Quality of the Physical Work Date of last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site CF12200 inspection and/or audit related to quality of the physical 11/16/2001 work. CF12300 The number of findings related to the quality of the physical work. 0 CF12400 The number of findings related to the quality of the physical work that have been corrected by the PHA. 0 The number of findings related to the quality of the CF12500 physical work that the PHA is in the process of 0 correcting. Component 5: Budget Controls CF12700 Total amount of Capital Funds expended during the PHA fiscal year being assessed. $ 479,866.15 The amount of Capital Funds expended on approved CF12800 work items not subject to budget revisions during the $ 461,258.40 PHA fiscal year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended under budget CF12900 revisions with prior HUD approval during the PHA fiscal $ 18,607.75 year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended under budget CF13000 revisions not requiring prior HUD approval during the $ 0.00 PHA fiscal year being assessed. [rop of Pa e https://www l l .hud. gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfrn?part... 11/16/2006 • View Print Full Submission Sub -Indicator 3: Work Orders ELEMENT DESCRIPTION Component 1: Emergency Work Orders .W10000 Total number of emergency work orders. W10100 Total number of emergency work orders completed / abated within 24 hours. W10200 Percentage of emergency work orders completed / abated within 24 hours. Component 2: Non -Emergency Work Orders W10500 Total number of non -emergency work orders. W10600 Total number of calendar days it took to complete non- emergency work orders. Average number of days PHA has reduced the time it W10700 takes to complete non -emergency work orders over the past three years. W10800 Average completion days. • ELEMENT Component 1 A10000 A10100 A10200 A10300 A10400 A10550 A10600 A10700 A10800 • Component 2: ria�fal Sub -Indicator 4: Annual Inspection of Dwelling Units and Systems DESCRIPTION Annual Inspection of Dwelling Units The total number of ACC units. The sum of units exempted where the PHA made two documented attempts to inspect and is enforcing the lease. Vacant units exempted for Capital Fund. Vacant units exempted for other reasons. Total number of units inspected using the Uniform Physical Condition Standards (UPCS). Total number of units inspected that did not require repairs. The number of units where necessary repairs were completed to comply with UPCS either during the inspection, issued work orders for the repairs, or referred the deficiency to the current year's or next year's Capital Fund program. Page 3 of 5 AMOUNT 94 94 100.00% 11358 3,391 0.00 2.50 AMOUNT 252 0 0 0 252 27 225 Adjusted units available. 252 Percent of units inspected by PHA. 100.00% Annual Inspection of Systems Including Common Areas and Non -Dwelling Space https://www l l .hud.gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfin?part... 11/16/2006 C, J View Print Full Submission Page 4 of 5 A11100 Total number of projects. 12 A11200 Total number of projects exempted from the inspection 0 of systems. Al 1300 The total number of projects where all systems were 2 inspected in accordance with the UPCS. Al 1400 Total number of buildings. 52 Al 1500 Total number of buildings exempted from the inspection of systems. 0 Al 1600 Total number of buildings where all systems were 52 inspected in accordance with the UPCS. The number of buildings and projects where necessary repairs were completed to comply with UPCS either Al 1700 during the inspection, issued work orders for the 40 repairs, or referred the deficiency to the current year's or next year's Capital Fund program. A11800 Percentage of projects inspected. 100.00% A11900 Percentage of buildings inspected. 100.00% frog of PageJ Sub -Indicator 5: Security • ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Component 1: Tracking and Reporting Crime -Related Problems S10000 The date that the Board adopted current policies to track crime and crime -related problems. 09/23/1998 S10100 The date that the PHA implemented the current procedures to track crime and crime -related problems. 09/23/1998 The date that the PHA implemented a current S10200 cooperative system for tracking and reporting crime to 09/23/1998 local police authorities. S10300 The number of crimes that the PHA can document it reported to local police authorities. 7 S10400 Percentage of developments where PHA can document it tracks crime and crime -related problems. 100.00% Component 2: Screening of Applicants S10500 The date the Board adopted current screening policies that reflect the applicable criteria. 09/23/1998 S10600 The date the PHA implemented current screening procedures that reflect the applicable criteria. 09/23/1998 PHA can document that current screening procedures S10700 result in successfully denying admission to applicants yes who meet the applicable criteria (enter Yes or No). S10800 The total number of applicants denied who met the • applicable criteria 11 Component 3: Lease Enforcement https://www l l .hud.gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfm?part... 11/16/2006 Print Full Submission Page 5 of 5 S10900 The date the Board adopted current eviction policies 09/23/1998 that reflect the applicable criteria. • S11000 The date the PHA implemented current eviction 09/23/1998 procedures that reflect the applicable criteria. PHA can document that eviction screening procedures S11100 resulted in the evicting of residents who meet the yes applicable criteria (enter Yes or No). S11200 The total number of evictions as a result of the applicable criteria. Component 4: Drug Prevention and/or Crime Reduction Program Goals S11350 The number of HUD -funded drug prevention and/or 0 crime reduction programs. The number of non HUD -funded drug prevention and/or S11450 crime reduction programs that the PHA requests to be 0 assessed. S11550 The number of documented program goals that are 0 related to drug -prevention and/or crime reduction. The number of goals the PHA can document it met S11600 under the implementation plans(s) for any and all of 0 these programs. Percentage of goals that the PHA can document it met S11700 under the implementation plans(s) for any and all of 0.00% these programs. lfop of Pagel Sub -Indicator 6: Economic Self -Sufficiency C1 ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT E10000 The number of HUD -funded economic self-sufficiency 0 programs. The number of non HUD -funded economic self - E10100 sufficiency programs that the PHA requests to be 0 assessed. E10200 The number of documented program goals that are 0 related to economic self-sufficiency. The number of goals the PHA can document it met E10300 under the implementation plan(s) for any and all of 0 these programs. Percentage of goals that the PHA can document it met E10400 under the implementation plan(s) for any and all of 0.00% these programs. Fop of Pagel Comments or Questions? Please go to6Technical Assistance Center or Contact MASS https://wwwll.hud.gov/HLTD Systems/mass/mass—view_print—full—submission.cfm?part... 11/16/2006 0 RESOLUTION NO. 781 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF PUBLIC HOUSING MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (PHAS) CERTIFICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING 9/30/06 WHEREAS, The Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority is required to review the Annual PHAS Certification and authorize the submission of the PHAS Certification and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority did review the attached PHAS Certification for Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/06 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY: That the Executive Director of the Housing Authority is authorized to execute the attached PHAS Certification for Fiscal Year ending 9/30/06. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS /V - DAY OF 006. F.UW112mrm 0 THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS FAF Lei; Fly 4 ON Opp .N I • View Print Full Submission Management Assessment for Public Housing Agencies View/Print Full Submission PHA Code: AR097 FYE : 09/30 Fiscal Year: 2006 PHA Name: Housing Authority of the City of Fayetteville Submission Type: Submission Status : Draft Page 1 of 5 Inbox I Unit Turnaround I Capital Fund I Work Orders I Annual Inspection I Security I Econ. Self-Suff Sub -Indicator 1: Vacant Unit Turnaround Time ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT V12400 Total number of turnaround days. 21754 V12500 Total number of vacancy days exempted for Capital 0 Fund. V12600 Total number of vacancy days exempted for other 0 reasons. V12700 Total number of vacant units turned around and lease in 111 effect in the PHA's immediate past fiscal year. V12800 Average number of calendar days units were in down 11 99 time. Average number of calendar days units were in make V12900 ready time. 7.03 V13000 Average number of calendar days units were in lease up 5.79 time. V13100 Average Unit Turnaround Days. 24.81 rLoP of Pagel Sub -Indicator 2: Capital Fund ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Do you have any open Capital Fund programs(e.g. CGP, CF10000 HOPE VI)(YIN)? Open = any program that does not have yes a pre -audit end date or that received a pre -audit end date during the fiscal year being assessed. Component 1: Unexpended Funds Over Three Federal Fiscal Years (FFYs) Old Total funds authorized over 3 FFYs old that do not have CF10050 a pre -audit end date or that received a pre -audit end $ 0.00 date during the fiscal year being assessed. Total funds expended over 3 FFYs old that do not have CF10100 a pre -audit end date or that received a pre -audit end $ 0.00 date during the fiscal year being assessed. • CF10200 Unexpended funds to be recaptured (enter dollar amt). $ 0.00 CF10300 Unexpended funds approved by HUD over 3 FFYs old $ 0.00 https //wwwl l.hud.gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfm?part. I 11/16/2006 View Print Full Submission Page 2 of 5 (enter dollar amt). • CF10400 Unexpended funds with time extensions due to reasons $ 0.00 outside of PHA control (enter dollar amt). CF10500 Adjusted total unexpended funds. $ 0.00 Component 2: Timeliness of Fund Obligation CF11100 Total funds authorized for grants over 2 FFYs old. $ 0.00 CF11200 Total funds obligated over 2 FFYs old. $ 0.00 CF11300 Unobligated funds approved by HUD over 2 FFYs old $ 0.00 (enter dollar amt). CF11400 Unobligated funds with time extensions due to reasons $ 0.00 outside of PHA control (enter dollar amt). CF11500 Adjusted total unobligated funds. $ 0.00 Component 3: Adequacy of Contract Administration The date of last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site CFI 1700 inspection and/or audit related to contract 02/28/2006 administration (include At 33 audit). CF11800 The number of findings related to contract 0 administration. The number of findings related to contract CF11900 administration that have been corrected by the PHA. 0 The number of findings related to contract CF12000 administration that the PHA is in the process of 0 • correcting. Component 4: Quality of the Physical Work Date of last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site CF12200 inspection and/or audit related to quality of the physical 11/16/2001 work. CF12300 The number of findings related to the quality of the 0 physical work. CF12400 The number of findings related to the quality of the 0 physical work that have been corrected by the PHA. The number of findings related to the quality of the CF12500 physical work that the PHA is in the process of 0 correcting. Component 5: Budget Controls CF12700 Total amount of Capital Funds expended during the $ 479,866.15 PHA fiscal year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended on approved CF12800 work items not subject to budget revisions during the $ 461,258.40 PHA fiscal year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended under budget CF12900 revisions with prior HUD approval during the PHA fiscal $ 18,607.75 year being assessed. The amount of Capital Funds expended under budget CF13000 revisions not requiring prior HUD approval during the $ 0.00 • PHA fiscal year being assessed. [fop of Page https-://wwwll.hud.gov/HLTD Systems/mass/mass—view—Print—full—submission.cfm?part... 11/16/2006 0 View Print Full Submission Sub -Indicator 3: Work Orders ELEMENT DESCRIPTION Component 1: Emergency Work Orders W10000 Total number of emergency work orders. W10100 Total number of emergency work orders completed / abated within 24 hours. W10200 Percentage of emergency work orders completed / abated within 24 hours. Component 2: Non -Emergency Work Orders W10500 Total number of non -emergency work orders. W10600 Total number of calendar days it took to complete non- emergency work orders. Average number of days PHA has reduced the time it W10700 takes to complete non -emergency work orders over the past three years. W10800 Average completion days. [fop of Page] Sub -Indicator 4: Annual Inspection of Dwelling Units and Systems ELEMENT DESCRIPTION Component 1: Annual Inspection of Dwelling Units A10000 The total number of ACC units. The sum of units exempted where the PHA made two A10100 documented attempts to inspect and is enforcing the lease. A10200 Vacant units exempted for Capital Fund. A10300 Vacant units exempted for other reasons. A10400 Total number of units inspected using the Uniform Physical Condition Standards (OPCS). A10550 Total number of units inspected that did not require repairs. The number of units where necessary repairs were completed to comply with UPCS either during the A10600 inspection, issued work orders for the repairs, or referred the deficiency to the current year's or next year's Capital Fund program. A10700 . A10800 Component 2: Page 3 of 5 AMOUNT 94 94 100.00% 17358 31391 0.00 2.50 AMOUNT 252 0 0 0 252 27 225 Adjusted units available. 252 Percent of units inspected by PHA. 100.00% Annual Inspection of Systems Including Common Areas and Non -Dwelling Space https://www l l .hud.gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfm?part. 11/16/2006 View Print Full Submission I Page 4 of 5 A11100 Total number of projects. 2 A11200 Total number of projects exempted from the inspection 0 • of systems. A11300 The total number of projects where all systems were 2 inspected in accordance with the UPCS. A11400 Total number of buildings. 52 A11500 Total number of buildings exempted from the inspection 0 of systems. A11600 Total number of buildings where all systems were 52 inspected in accordance with the UPCS. The number of buildings and projects where necessary repairs were completed to comply with UPCS either A11700 during the inspection, issued work orders for the 40 repairs, or referred the deficiency to the current year's or next year's Capital Fund program. A11800 Percentage of projects inspected. 100.00% A11900 Percentage of buildings inspected. 100.00% Prop of Pagel Sub -Indicator 5: Security • ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Component 1: Tracking and Reporting Crime -Related Problems S10000 The date that the Board adopted current policies to 09/23/1998 track crime and crime -related problems. S10100 The date that the PHA implemented the current 09/23/1998 procedures to track crime and crime -related problems. The date that the PHA implemented a current S10200 cooperative system for tracking and reporting crime to 09/23/1998 local police authorities. S10300 The number of crimes that the PHA can document it reported to local police authorities. S10400 Percentage of developments where PHA can document 100.00% it tracks crime and crime -related problems. Component 2: Screening of Applicants S10500 The date the Board adopted current screening policies 09/23/1998 that reflect the applicable criteria. S10600 The date the PHA implemented current screening 09/23/1998 procedures that reflect the applicable criteria. PHA can document that current screening procedures S10700 result in successfully denying admission to applicants yes who meet the applicable criteria (enter Yes or No). • S10800 The total number of applicants denied who met the 11 applicable criteria Component 3: Lease Enforcement https://www l l .hud.gov/HM—Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfm?part... 11/16/2006 View Print Full Submission Page 5 of 5 S10900 The date the Board adopted current eviction policies 09/23/1998 • that reflect the applicable criteria. S11000 The date the PHA implemented current eviction 09/23/1998 procedures that reflect the applicable criteria. PHA can document that eviction screening procedures S11100 resulted in the evicting of residents who meet the yes applicable criteria (enter Yes or No). S11200 The total number of evictions as a result of the 7 applicable criteria. I Component 4: Drug Prevention and/or Crime Reduction Program Goals The number of HUD -funded drug prevention and/or S11350 crime reduction programs. 0 The number of non HUD -funded drug prevention and/or S11450 crime reduction programs that the PHA requests to be 0 assessed. The number of documented program goals that are S11550 related to drug -prevention and/or crime reduction. 0 The number of goals the PHA can document it met 511600 under the implementation plans(s) for any and all of 0 these programs. Percentage of goals that the PHA can document it met S11700 under the implementation plans(s) for any and all of 0.00% these programs. • [[oo of Pagel Sub -Indicator 6: Economic Self -Sufficiency ELEMENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT E10000 The number of HUD -funded economic self-sufficiency 0 programs. The number of non HUD -funded economic self - E10100 sufficiency programs that the PHA requests to be 0 assessed. E10200 The number of documented program goals that are 0 related to economic self-sufficiency. The number of goals the PHA can document it met E10300 under the implementation plan(s) for any and all of 0 these programs. Percentage of goals that the PHA can document it met E10400 under the implementation plan(s) for any and all of 0.00% these programs. [foo of Pagel Comments or Questions? Please go to Technical Assistance Center or Contact MASS httpsi//www l l .hud.gov/HUD_Systems/mass/mass_view_print_full_submission.cfin?part... 11/16/2006 1 • RESOLUTION NO. 782 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPENDING OF FUNDS FOR THE FAYETTEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY HIRED CONSULTANT FEES IN REFERENCE TO TASK ORDER #1 WHEREAS, the Fayetteville Housing Authority is pursuing the development of it's excess land connected to Morgan Manor Apartments. WHEREAS, the Fayetteville Housing Authority has used the expertise of (Ledford Planning and Engineering) to evaluate this piece of land to calculate the amount of units which could be placed on it. This was essential so as to determine whether to hire a developer or a contractor. WHEREAS, the Fayetteville Housing Authority is now ready to move to the next step of hiring a firm for the development of this piece of land and we have drawn up a Task Order #1 for the hourly rate consultant to: 1) To Prepare the RFP for a Developer or Contractor. 2) Develop the advertisement, and; 3) Assist with the procurement process. • WHEREAS, the Quadel Consulting Corporation has presented a cost proposal for this Task Order#1 in the amount of $9,685.82. WHEREAS, the Executive Director (Fredia Sawin) has reviewed this cost proposal and deems that it is fair and reasonable: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE FAYETTEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY that this Resolution #782 be PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2006 ATTEST: S CRETARY 11 THE HOUSING AUTHORITYOF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS • i0 o b b 000 �F o -: T 000000 N N V1 O 0000 O O O W O O O O P P N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O— O O NJ O O O m O vi O m vi Pm P VI 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O O O O O O app Aor 1 1,000 a w w O 10 e❑m N 0 a 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 1A 0 O O O O O O O O O 10 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C O ice o _ 0 oa P P m 3: b b yam` q F 5:: go 9r F- M N o b b 000 �F o -: .� 000000 0000 0 O O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O o L. b b 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O O O O O O app Aor 1 1,000 a w w O 10 e❑m N 0 a 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 1A 0 O O O O O O O O O 10 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ice o _ 0 oa q F 5:: N o m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O C o 0 o O C o 0 o O o O o 0 o p a w w O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 1A 0 O O O O O O O O O c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N or a ("�>� ❑,9. 9rra, w ', =r= ' o ry ry n ............................ ........................... .t F, — — rn v n F 91 o.r ' W ✓ U P ve o o m — n N �p O ry N b '^ rvNo ry comm � ..�.61o6 R 69 ..7 rr9r .9o. T yO o0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 000 O O ti gy; ............................. ............................ ............................. ............................ .....116 ....................... 6 r P P e r1 O V 1 O O O'O O O A h e O O x 61-06 e H ©p o y F a 9r 90 r D O� r r9 i H w U ©N N U ❑ r or T F y ❑ W O U 9 v a F V 0 90 r 9r w TG T C AOe O v Aj Cu C9 V tV W°_ e a x F u e W (j F F rt i E v a e o o n 1'e ?c L a A A A .W. c o E, V V G o m❑ o f .A. f 96o 969.6196 1616 _ v u _ a W 00 m a C F' L ql9 .Y C —9 C W❑❑ 6 V