HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-02-05 - Minutes - ArchiveMINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
The Housing Authority of the City of Fayetteville, ARkansas met in Special
Session at 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 5, 1980 in the office of the Authority
#1 North School, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Upon Roll Call, the Following were present:
Commissioners Present: Windham, Seaton, Endress
Commissioners Absent: Morgan, Shreve
Others Present: Chad Kumpe, Bromo Wilson , Pat Donat
Mr. Windham opened the meeting. We will start this meeting going from the
meeting we had Monday, February 4th. Our alternatives being Appealing,
going with Comley or going Conventional.
Chad stated that Mr. Howard had confirmed that we do not have to specifically
advertise for any Architect. If we interview two or four that would be more
than sufficient.
After further discussion, Mr. Seaton made a motion to go with the Conventional
Method. Mrs. Endress seconded the motion.
Chad mentioned that he has to be in Little Rock Thursday, February 7, 1980 and
that he would drop into the Little Rock Office and get some guidlines. Also
I will get a Zoning map from the City to look at when we interview the Architects.
After further discussion, the meeting was adjourned.
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
IRMAN
•-eoueing cautkorit y
•
•
of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
1 NORTH SCHOOL - 21P 72701
TELEPHONE 521-3850
URBAN RENEWAL OFFICE
Phone 442-5326
January 29, 1980
NOTICE TO ALL COMMISSIONERS AND PAST CHAIRMAN, PHIL TAYLOR
The Acting Chairman of the Board has called a Special Meeting of the
Board of Commissioners of the Fayetteville Housing Authority. The
reason for this call is to meet with a group of HUD Officials from
Little Rock. They will explain the rejection of the Turn -Key Preposal
as well as discuss the Conventional method of Constructing Low Income
Housing. The Leader of the delegation will be Lloyd Clapsaddle who
is Director of Multi -Family Housing for the ,prea Office.
Chad Kumpe
Executive Director
•
•
•
•
1509 Oak Manor Drive
Fayetteville, AR 72701
July 23, 1979
Mr. Andy Watts, Area Manager
Dept. of Housing & Urban Development
Union National Bank Building
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Watts:
On April 3, 1978, we received a notification of Housing Assistance
availability. On May 5, 1978, we made the necessary application and on
May 18, 1978, the City expanded our cooperation agreement to include the
new 52 units. On September 21, 1978, we were informed that our application
had been approved and the Director was instructed to attend a Project
Planning Conference on October 21, 1978. As a result of this meeting a
time table and developers' packet were formulated and sent to HUD on
February 20, 1979. This packet was subsequently approved as of March 21,
1979. We advertised for developers and opened bids on May 8. The bids
were too high, primarily because of the scattering of the units throughout
the community and inflation.
On June 22, 1979, our developers' packet was submitted with a signifi-
cant decrease in the number of sites (from 16 to 4). We would certainly
desire to continue to pursue the construction of this housing under the
Turn -Key method as we have considerable time and some money invested in
this procedure. We feel we can attract qualified developers, and the money
market is not as tight in Northwest Arkansas as in other parts of the State.
I am sure you are aware of the growth of this area. Consequently, we are
in desperate need of new rental units for low income families. Our current
waiting list, with completed applications, totals 42 families.
The delays in this project have certainly been frustrating because of
the impact of inflation on construction costs. I am appealing to you for
your assistance in expediting the current review of our submitals in order
to provide assistance to that portion of our ever-growing population that
needs U.S. Government assistance in acquiring sanitary and decent housing.
We are fearful that further delay on this project, which we have been
working on for nearly a year, will either diminish the number of units we
•
•
Mr. Andy Watts, Area Manager
Page 2
July 23, 1979
can provide or ultimately kill the project. Moreover, inflation is dimin-
ishing our scarce resources. It is our opinion that extended delays have
been detrimental to this project.
I would appreciate hearing from you in the near future.
PHT/sel
cc: Chad Kumpe
•
rely,
Phillip H. Taylor
Charman of the Commission
Fayetteville Housing Authority
•
4
11111111
• b, so A"
REGION VI
•
:PARTMEN'f OF r.L. o .. ,,.\ •°OMEN
LITTLE ROCK AREA OFFICE
UNION NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, ONE UNION NATIONAL PLAZA
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
January 4, 1980
IN REPLY REFER TOi •
6.2HDH
Mr. Chad Kumpe
Executive Director, Housing
Authority of Fayetteville
#1 North School Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Dear Mr. Kumpe:
Subject: Turnkey Public Housing
Project No. AR -097-002
Fayetteville, AR
We have reviewed the proposals which were submitted in response to your
recent advertisement and find that we cannot concur in the selection of
Ernest R. Coleman Company as developer of the subject project.
Specifically, we have determined that we cannot agree with the increment
of value ascribed to the elements of Design and Construction Quality,
Developer Qualifications, and Price in the proposal evaluation system.
We believe the conclusions reached are in certain respects not supported
by the proposal contents and are therefore not reasonable. Also, certain
environmental and physical features of the sites;i.e., possible noxious
noise and odors, remoteness, steep slopes, heavy traffic, etc., render
some of the sites undesirable.
The net effect of our review is that the relative order of your top two
proposals would be reversed; i.e., Comley, Coleman rather than Coleman,
Comley.
The Public Housing Development Handbook, 7417.1, provides that, if the
Area Office and the PHA cannot agree on the ranking of proposals, then
the program reservation will be canceled. However, before such action
is taken we believe it is appropriate to discuss the matter and seek
alternative solutions.
Please advise as soon as possible as to your desires in this matter.
SincerQly,
Alr
Kenneth D. Brown
Deputy for Development
Housing Division
•
g-Qoufaing c4uthoriiy
of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
1 NORTH SCHOOL - ZIP 72701
TELEPHONE 521-3050
URBAN RENEWAL OFFICE
Phone 442-5326
January 8, 1980
Kenneth D. Brown
Deputy for Development
Housing Division
Dept. of Hous. & Urban Dev,
Union National Bank Bldg,
Little Rock, AR 72201
Subject: Turnkey Public Housing
Project No. AR -097-002
Fayetteville, AR
We are stunned that you feel the locations and Developer,
as selected by the Local Housing Authority Board of Upstanding
Fayetteville Citizens, is not satisfactory to the Area Office
in Little Rock.
We do ascribe a great deal of value to scattered sites and
design and construction quality. What ever is constructed by the
Fayetteville Housing Authority,we, the citizens of Fayetteville,
must live with for the next fifty years. We already have two
Public Housing Complexes that have serious design problems. They
are very poorly located. And we want no more of that. We would
think that you should certainly feel the same. We also cannot
understand your example of poor physical features of site; i.e.
remoteness because this was one of the big reasons for choosing
Coleman rather than Comley. One of the two Comley sites required
a "Low Income Family" to have a car to even go to the Grocery Store.
This seems to be ridiculous.
When Andy Watts gave the main speech at our last NAHRO Con-
vention, he stoutly advocated scattered sites and getting away from
the "Project" image. We hole heartedly believed in what he said,
now it is his office that is attempting to force us to concentrate
Public Housing in traditional little boxes with brick stuck on the
outside. Why is there only one acceptable mold? Did Andy, himself,
actually review this decision?
Page 2
January 8, 1980'
We, of course, need many additional units of Public Housing and
we hope this disagreement does not result in the Program Reservation
being canceled. We would be very interested in discussing the matter.
We had thought we had picked the best alternative solution of the two
we had to choose from. If there are any other alternative solutions
we feel it would be up to you to suggest them.
As we all know time is of the essance. Please advise us for
how to proceed.
fs
Chad inpe
Executive Director
- — — -
•
•
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING ANL) URSAN DEvtLOPMENT
LITTLE ROCK AREA OFFICE
UNION NATIONAL BANK BUILDING, ONE UNION NATIONAL PLAZA
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201
January 22,1 1980
IN REPLY REFER TOI
6.2HDH
Mr. Chad Kumpe
Executive Director, Housing
Authority of Fayetteville
#1 North School Avenue
Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Dear Mr. Kumpe:
Subject: Turnkey Low Rent Public Housing
Project Number AR -097-002
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Pursuant to our telephone conversation this date, and to
reflect that this office and the Fayetteville PHA are
unable to agree on the ranking of proposals, you are
hereby notified that the program reservation for the
above captioned project is cancelled.
You are invited to submit a request for the same number
of units of conventional low rent public housing. This
should be done no later than February 12,_1980:
Sincerely,
21-fda—?ASQW41
ASL. D. Clapsaddle
Director, Housing Division
cc: Congressman John Paul Hammerschmidt
•
•
•
ouocn9 cAuLAortog
of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
f NORTH SCHOOL - ZIP 72701
TELEPHONE 521.3550
URBAN RENEWAL OFFICE
. Phone 442-5326
January 24, 1980.
L. D. Clapsaddle
Director, Housing Div.
Dept. of HUD
Union National Bank
Little Rock, AR 72201
After receiving your last letter, I have a feeling you three
guys put this Old Country Boy in a "Trick Bag". I feel that our
Board and Community need a little more explanation before we are
going to tell anyone we are even mildly satisfied. If past per-
formance are any indication, it now seems Fayetteville is 18 mos.
to two years away from any additional Public Housing This sure
will not be acceptable.
You need to answer a few questions for us. 1. How long will
the Conventional Process take? 2. How will we go about the site
selection process? After all, you saw an awful lot of potential
sites when you visited. We still do not know your criteria for
site selection and design qu0Lty.
It still looks to us that you are saying "Do it my way or not
at all" but yet we are not sure how your way works. It will be very
hard for us to accept the idea we have spent 18 mos. to get backed to
the starting line. We still need assurances that your decision,
originally made in Little Rock (Comley VS Coleman), was not Just a
you against us buracratic position.
When we talk face to face, I think we are on the same team.
Your explanations leave me with a feeling we are not even in the same
Ball Park.
ad Kump
Executive Director
•