HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-07-02 MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING
• OF THE -# ;•
CITY COUNCIL ; }
JULY 2, 2002
•
•
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 1
A meeting of the Fayetteville City Council was held on. July 2, 2002 at 6:30 p.m. in
Room 219 of the City -Administration Building located at 113 West Mountain,
Fayetteville, Arkaiisas. .,,, „ t S.
PRESENT: Mayor Coody, Aldermen Thiel, Young, Marr, Bechard, Davis, Santos,
Jordan, and Reynolds, City Attomey Kit Williams, City Clerk Heather Woodruff, Staff,
Press and Audience.
NOMINATING COMMITTEE REPORT
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Jackson White/One three-year Certified Public Accountant term ending 12/31/04
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND BOARD OF SIGN APPEALS
Sheree M Alt/One five-year Public -at -Large term ending 03/31/07
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
Stanley E. Adelman/One three-year term ending 03/31/05
CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Jerry Bailey/One one-year Alternate term ending 03/31/03
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS COMMITTEE
Jeremy Webb/One three-year Local Industry term ending 06/30/05
Marti Benedict/One three-year Science Discipline tern ending 06/30/05
Steven R. Jackson/One three-year Citizen -at -Large term ending 06/30/05
Stacey Wingate/One three-year Citizen -at -Large term ending 06/30/05
Chen Lynn Coley/One three-year Citizen -at -Large term ending 06/30/05
Linda Rupe/One three-year Citizen -at -Large term ending 06/30/05
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOARD
Jon C. Lofton/One two-year term ending 06/30/04
Kenneth Myers/One two-year term ending 06/30/04
Gary Ault/One unexpired term ending 06/30/03
TREE AND LANDSCAPE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
John Clark Rupe/One unexpired University Representative term ending 12/31/03
WALTON ARTS CENTER COUNCIL, INC.
Linda A. Gaddy/One three-year term ending 06/30/05
City Council Mmutes
July 2, 2002
Page 2
YOUTH ADVOCACY COMMT1 LEE
Barbara A. Lofton/One two-year Teacher term ending 05/31/04
Alderman Santos moved to appoint. Alderman Thiel seconded. Upon roll call the
motion carried unanimously.
Alderman Santos stated they were in a four-four tie between Steve Frankenburger and
Troy Wilson for Planning Comnussion. It was the consensus of the Council to interview
applicants for the Planning Commission again.
CONSENT
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
GARVER ENGINEERS: •A resolution awarding an engineermg contract to Garver
Engineers m the not -to -exceed amount of $275,000 to provide engineering services for
the accelerated waterlme replacement project.
RESOLUTION 101-02 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
USINFRASTRUCTURE: A resolution awarding the engineenng contract to the firm of
USlnfrastructure for engineering studies and recommendations for (1) the upper
Hamestring Creek Basin and (2) the Shenandoah Trailer Park area. The contract price is
not -to -exceed $93,424; and approval of an engineering contract contingency in the
amount of $10,000.
RESOLUTION 102-02 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
AATC LEASE: A resolution approving a lease with Northwest Arkansas Aviation
Technologies Center for an executive hangar located at 4248 South School.
RESOLUTION 103-02 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Alderman Davis moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Alderman Santos
seconded. Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
VA 02-1.00: An ordinance approving vacation request VA 02-1.00 as submitted by Ken
and Kathie Marvin for property located in Rochier Heights Subdivision. The request is to
vacate the alley between Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11 of Block 5. The ordinance was left on the
1st reading at the June 18, 2002 meeting.
Alderman Davis moved to table the item. Alderman Reynolds seconded. Upon roll
call the motion carried unanimously.
ITEM WAS TABLED.
NEW BUSINESS
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 3
RZN 02-15 004 An ordinance approving rezoning request RZN 02-15 00 as submitted by
Dave Jorgensen of behalf of Larry Garriott for property located `north of Persimmon
Street and west of 46th Street. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural and contains
approximately 57.82 acres. The request is to rezone to R-1, Low Density Residential;
and to accept the attached Bill of Assurance.
Mr. Williams read the ordinance for the first time.
Alderman Jordan stated he had met with some of the people in that area. They were
concemed about traffic congestion and drainage. This proposal had been turned down in
1998.
Alderman Young asked where the traffic congestion was that the residents were
concerned about.
Alderman Jordan stated they were concemed about the traffic on 46th Street and
Persimmon. They had stated • they were already ,having trouble getting out- onto
Wedington as it was They. had suggested another access road coming out of this
development going to Wedington.
Mr. Hugh Earnest, Urban Development:Director, stated the:Planning.Department had
prepared an aerial photo of the 'area and a list of all the: developments in the area within
the last two years. All the developments relate to a map that has been laid out over the
past ten years. The staff was very close to bringing thema recommendation for a master
traffic study/master street plan. What they would see in the sttidy.would be what the area
would- looklike at build out. Wedington was classified as a principle arterial and can
-
carry up to twenty thousand :park per, day.: Their current traffic count at Wedmgton and
469h. was thirty-six thousand vehicles per day.' The proposed development• at build out
would add a thousand trips per day on the Wedington• corridor, still leaving some
capacity. At some point the future the Wedington corridor will be at capacity. It was not
at capacity right now.
Alderman Thiel asked where Persimmon went and what did it link them to?
Mr. Earnest stated Persimmon would tie to the Rupple Road extension that they were
building to the Boys and Girls Club. 46th Street will be built as a collector to tie mto
Persimmon. Over time they would begin to see a grid of road that would service the area.
Alderman Young suggested that they educate them on the number traffic lights proposed
or something that would break up the traffic so people could get onto the road.
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 4
Mr. Earnest stated they were going to be getting some counts so that they could justify
the placement of the traffic signal. Somewhere on the corridor they were going to have
to install some signals to break up the traffic flow.
Alderman Jordan stated they were going to have to build the infrastructure to
accommodate their growth. They could not continue to develop without constructing the
infrastructure.
Alderman Reynolds stated Wedmgton was a State Highway and was not a city street. By
the time they get their school and the Boys and Girls Club they would convince the
Highway Department that they needed a traffic signal.
Alderman Santos stated it would take more development and more congestion out there
before the situation would get bad enough that the Highway Department would allow
them to up in a stop light. This was sprawl and it was costing all the citizens of
Fayetteville money. They needed impact fees to help cover the costs.
Ms. Sharon Davison, an area resident, expressed the need for the city to adopt impact fees
to help cover the cost of the development.
Mr. Bassam stated he lived on 46th Street. He did not oppose the development. This
development had been denied by the Planning Commission and the City Council m 1998.
The traffic had increased by one thousands traps in the last three years. The proposed
development will generate about twenty three hundred trips per day according to the
report done by the Traffic Department. The State had no plans for any improvements to
Hwy 16 for the next five to six years because there was no money.
Mr. Dave Jorgensen, Jorgensen and Associates, stated the developers were paying for
everything m this project, the streets, curb and gutter, the water/sewer, drainage, and the
privacy fence along Persimmon and 46th street. The widening along their side of the
street along Persimmon and 46th Street. The infrastructure was coming. The sewage
treatment plant was being designed at this time Water lines would be extended. This
was not in the middle of nowhere. There was a lot going on in this direction. He had met
with several neighbors. He would be glad to met with anyone else. They had offered a
bill of assurance to prove this was going to be a good development. A maximum of 158
homes. The project that had been brought forward before it had more lots. They were
allowed four lots per acre, 232 lots. They were offering a minimum of 1800 square foot
homes, eighty percent brick, sodded lawns. There would be one entrance on Persimmon
and two on 46th Street.
Alderman Reynolds stated he had voted against this project when he was on the Planning
Commission. He had done that because it was in the noddle of nowhere. That was not
the story now. He thought the project looked pretty good.
THE ORDINANCE WAS LEFT ON THE FIRST READING.
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 5
VA 02-4.00: An ordinance approving vacation request VA 02-4.00 as submitted by
Henry Renegar forproperty located at 925 Rockwood Trail. The request is to vacate a
10' wide utility easement.
Mr. Williams read the ordinance for the first time.
Alderman Davis moved to suspend the rules and move to the second reading.
Alderman Reynolds seconded. Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Williams read the ordinance for the second time.
Alderman Davis moved to suspendthe rules and move to the third and final
reading. Alderman Reynolds seconded. Upon roll call the motion carried
unanimously.
Mr. Williams read the ordinance for the third and final time.
Mayor Coody asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the motion carried
unanimously.
ORDINANCE 4405 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
RJN GROUP: A resolution approving an engineering contract with RJN Group for
sanitary sewer.rehabilitation design forRiver Basins 1-5, 18 and 19 and White
River mimsystem 27 (Industrial Park); in the amount of $548,653, and approval of a 5%
contingency of $27,433.
t; :4 .. • _:4
Mr. Greg Beottcher, PublicWorksDirector, stated this' was part of their sewer system
rehabilitation work that they had been continuing basin by basin through the city. It was
approximately 3.6 million .dollars inoverall construction. 4They had an ongoing
relationship with RJN, this was to correct the overflows and to deal with lines that could
still be rehabilitated. This was a budgeted infrastructure rehabilitation program to correct
the excess flow problems.
•
Alderman Santos moved to approve the resolution. Alderman Jordan seconded.
Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION 104-02 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
OUTDOOR MUSIC ESTABLISHMENT• An ordinance adding a definition of
"Outdoor Music Establishment" to Chapter 151 Definitions of the Unified Development
Ordinance and adding Section 163:30 to the Unified Development Ordinance to make an
Outdoor Music Establishment a Conditional Use m specified zoning distracts.
Mr. Williams read the ordinance.
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 6
Alderman Reynolds stated he would be abstaining from the item.
Alderman Marr stated he had developed the ordinance in response to concerns from an
area neighborhood association. They were concemed about a proposed outdoor music
establishment and the fact that they had no avenue on the front end to have discussion
about the things that would be discussed if it required a conditional use permit, such as
the hours of operation, amplification, types of music, number of days of the week. He
thought that was important because there was a very big difference between an
acoustical guitar and a singer verses a Van Hanlen Band on a deck. Currently, there was
nothing that regulated it either way. The On the Rock Restaurant was a single situation
that highlighted why they needed this conditional use. His intent was to encourage front
end dialogue so that both could be successful. The spint of the ordinance was to allow
them to coexist and not to prohibit. With a dance hall conditional use, most of the issues
that they talked about we music, noise, litter, parking, and compatibility.
The proposed ordinance was to encourage discussion on the front end. They were
encouraging a mutual respect of each other. He was going to recommend that they send
this to Ordinance Review. There were a hst of items from the Planning Staff that there
needed to be discussion about
Alderman Thiel stated there was nothing in the proposed ordinance that addressed
temporary.
Alderman Marr stated some of those issues were on the list to discuss at Ordmance
Review.
Alderman Young stated this would be a means to allow the neighbors to have some
control when there were problems. Residents were crucial to the whole mix. Urban
blight would kill Dickson Street faster than anythmg. They needed to set up a situation
where everyone could co -exist. If this ordinance passed it would be a conditional use
which would be appealable to the City Council.
Ms. Sharon Davison, an area resident, stated it was her opinion that it would kill the
music scene.
Mr. Daniel Gold, an area resident, stated he lived just off Dickson Street. He was against
the proposed ordinance and thought it would hurt the music scene on Dickson.
Mr. Stephen Pollard, Maple Street Apartments, stated the quality of life was impacted by
these establishments. It was very hard to get prospective tenants to come when there is
an increase in litter, noise from Dickson Street and illegal parkmg.
Mr Richard Maynard, an area resident, stated he did not find anything wrong with the
proposed ordmance. They did need to co -exist to keep the downtown area viable He
thought this was a good ordinance.
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 7
Mr. Jim Robertson, All About,Town,'stated he had been covering live music on. Dickson
for the past five years: He asked the' Council not to discourage the music, scene on
Dickson Street. r;
E
Mr. George Weiss, an area resident, stated any ordinance that promoted upfront
discussion was good. k w . _ ,
,'
Ms. Emily Greg Pritchard, an area resident, stated she was enthusiastic ' about this
proposal. They have needed it for a long time. This was a solution so that things did not
get out of hand.
Mr. Bob Jordan, an area resident, asked if the city police had any control over the
University parties.
Chief Rick Hoyt, replied it was State owned property and they were exempt from the
city's ordinances.
Mr. Wes Cooper, On the Rocks, stated the ordinance had been directed towards them.
They agreed that a proactive approach would have been better, rather than discussion
during his construction process. They were willing to go through a conditional use
process.
Ms. Paula Marinoni, an area resident, stated her main concern was not Dickson Street.
They had been lied to in the past. They wanted it in writing. It was not meant to keep
anyone from opemng up or to shut them down. Residents were very important. She had
lived in Kansas City on their plaza for twenty years. They had a balance there. The
complaint driven process did not work. All that it did was let the crowds know who to
come and abuse.
Mr. Gear Gambell, musician, stated this additional restriction would be a determent to
their ability to perform down on Dickson Street.
Mr. Cal Canfield stated they had been up front with the city sense the beginning with
what they had planned to do. The roof top patios had been in their proposal since the
very beginning in 1999. They were proud of what they were doing and wanted to be
good neighbors.
Ms. Irene Pritchard, an. area resident, stated there was a need for this conditional use
permit. Residents needed an affective method of compromise. This would save a lot of
conflict.
Mr. Jay Golden, an area resident, questioned the pohcy of the police in regards to the
noise ordinance.
City Council Minutes
July 2, 2002
Page 8
Chief Rick Hoyt stated that they were to take the reading at the boundary line of where
the noise emanates. There also suppose to use the most restrictive
SENT TO ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE ON THE FIRST READING.
Meetmg adjourned at 9:40 p.m.