HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-08-15 Minutes`0'00160; 11
MINUTES OF A MEETING
OF THE
FAYETTEVILLE CITY COUNCIL
A ANJ$UST 15, 2000
A meeting of the Fayetteville City Council was be held on August 15, 2000 at 6:30 p.m in Room
219 of the City Administration Building located at 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville,
Arkansas.
PRESENT: Mayor Hanna, Aldermen Reynolds, Austin, Davis, Trumbo, Daniel, Santos, Young
and Russell; City Attorney Jerry Rose; Staff; Press, Audience.
CONSENT
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Approval of the minutes from the July 18, and, July 25,
2000 meetings.
,
Mayor Hanna stated Wings Air would be removed from the consent agenda.
Alderman Austin stated he would like to have the' Skate Park removed from the consent agenda
to allow public comment.
Alderman Young moved to approve the minutes. Alderman Daniel seconded the motion.
Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
ARKANSAS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK: An ordinance approving a bid
wavier and an agreement (Amendment No. 1) to a previous contract for additional professional
services with EGIS Consulting Inc. regarding the USCOE 404 permit for the Arkansas Research
and Technology Park: The total contract amount is $164,050.00. , • 4 =T`-' J
Mr. Rose read the ordinance for the first time. • ;
,. i - }
Alderman Daniel stated she agreed with the bid waiver. She wondered how the public would
benefit from the wetland and woodland reserve would benefit the public and if it could be used to
supplement biology classes. + . - ' 4, • IM t
Mayor Hanna stated he did not think that there were any plans at the present how the property
would be used. It would be considered a wetland and they would have to be careful on what they
did with it.
Mr. Venable stated they would have to be restrictive. There was the Arkansas Darter present
000161
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 2
and there was some concem over that fish. There could be some trails put m, but they would
have to be careful not to disturb the wetland.
Andrea Radwell, an area resident, she expressed an interest in the preservation of the Wilson
Springs wetlands. Her comments were to provide some information to the City Council to may
be helpful in making decision regarding the development of the Arkansas Research and
Technology Park. The first issue was the Arkansas Darter, a fish species found in Wilson
Springs and Clabber Creek. The Arkansas Darter is a candidate species for endangered status. It
would be in the city's best interest to proceed as though it was fully hsted. The Corps of
Engineers concurs with this recommendation. The Wilson Springs wetland is a very high quality
wetland. Over three hundred species of living things have been identified. It should be kept m
mind that our objective is the preservation of the wetland as a whole. The other issue that is
relevant to decisions regarding the development of the Arkansas Research and Technology Park
is the proposed sewer line that is shown in preliminary plans along the eastem border of the Park.
A 404 permit is required for each section of the line that crosses a stream or wetland. I talked
with Ken Lyon at the Corps of Engineers last week posing the question of how this would be
handled since the line is in an area that already requires a permit, He said only one 404 permit
will be required. But it needs to be addressed how the sewer line will be designed to minimize
impacts on Clabber Creek. It is a large line with a one hundred foot easement. The Fish and
Wildlife Service has expressed their concems about the impact of the line because it crosses
Clabber Creek near its confluence with Wilson Spnngs. The design of the line and
considerations for protecting the stream dung construction will need to meet the approval of the
Corp and Fish and Wildlife before the 404 permit will be issued. Her intent was to inform the
council on the status of the Arkansas Darter and the plan to include a sewer line m the mitigated
area of the Park. Informed decisions are required to arrive at a plan that is acceptable to all
interested parties.
Alderman Santos stated he had confidence m EGIS that they would do everything they could to
protect the darter as part of their contract.
Ms. Radwell stated she would like to see the land used for educational purposes, however, it was
a delicate situation because it was wetland. She thought there was an area that could be used as a
park.
Mr. Drew Holt, EGIS Consulting, stated Ms. Radwell was correct about there being concern
about the fish and the wetland EGIS has worked with the city to reduce the impact associated
with the first project plan. He believed that they had reduced the impact to a point that the
project would be economically feasible and environmentally friendly. They were at the point
now, that they were wanting to finalize the mitigation plans to move forward with the project.
The fish species would be a major consideration in the final design as were the wetlands. The
mediation plans included thirty acres of preservation and approximately fifty acres of creation.
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 3
There was approximately ninety acres of mitigatidn>, The creation was where they created
wetlands and upland buffers as part of the mitigation?ifhe preservation was leaving it as it was.
Alderman Santos moved to suspend the rules and move to the second reading. Alderman
Davis seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion earned unanimously.
Mr. Rose read the ordinance for the second time.
Alderman Trumbo moved to suspend the rules and move to the third and final reading.
Alderman Daniel seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Rose read the ordinance for the third and final time.
Mayor Hanna asked shall the ordinance pass. Upon roll call the ordinance passed
unanimously.
ORDINANCE 4266 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
BEKKA DEVELOPMENT: Consideration of a claim by Bekka Development for legal
expenses in conjunction with Town Center. A claim for parking rental revenue was approved at
the June 20 2000 meeting of the Fayetteville City Council. If the claim is approved, approval of
a budget adjustment to fund the approved claim is also requested.
Mayor Hanna explained, they had seen this item earlier and it had been their desire to wait until
the judge ruled on the motion to pay for their expenses. They had been turned down, so it was
now back to them. w ,
t • 1 y •
Alderman Daniel stated that even though the City Attorney had stated in his opinion they were
not legally responsible for this. Bekka Development had been very cooperative. It would have
been impossible to do the Town Center Project without their cooperation. They had been.
through a lot legally. She was personally in favor of this and would be voting for the
compensation.
k
Alderman Trumbo stated he agreed with Alderman Trumbo. No one anticipated the Town
Center lawsuit. They had been brought into. The city had benefitted from the expertise of Jack
Butt and his law firm. He did not have a problem paying the legal fee.
Alderman Russell stated he had voted for paying for the lost parking revenues, but he did not
believe they should go along with this unless they were obligated to by contract. The Amencan
rule was that they could be sued for anything and when you are you paid your own attorney fees
unless they could get the plaintiffs to pay because the law suite was frivolous or another person
U U U 1.044 -
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 4
was contractually obligated to pay. He had supported their right to go before the judge and try
and get the plaintiff to pay the lawsuit, but the judge denied the motion. They were getting some
benefit from the Town Center, so he would be voting against the resolution.
Alderman Davis asked if they were setting themselves up for further attorney expenses due to the
appeal.
Mr. Rose stated the case may or may not be appealed, they did not know yet. The time for appeal
had not run. If Bekka chose to have an attomey to represent them in the appeal, then attomey
would be incurred
Alderman Trumbo moved to pay the legal expenses as submitted by Bekka Development
Co. Alderman Reynolds seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion failed by a vote of
3-5-0. Russell, Austin, Davis, Santos, and Young voting nay.
FAILED BYA VOTE OF 3-5-0.
FULTON PARKING LEASE: A resolution approving a lease agreement with Fulton
Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Town and Country Shop, located at 9 South Block Street for the lease of
four parking spaces.
Alderman Trumbo stated they had leased thirteen parking spaces to the Television station that
had moved into the old Campbell Bell Building. Part of their reasoning in leasmg those spaces
was that they were mvestmg in an old building and were bnnging more life back into the
downtown square The rate was fifty dollars per space per month. The reason they were looking
at approving parking leases for property owners on the square was because they were land
owners on the square because of the investment they had made. He thought it was the nght thing
to do for people who had business on the square. They were looking at detailed parking policy in
the future on leasing other public parking spaces. These were the only ones that he was aware of
that was for land owners on the square. It would help the people who had a great deal of capital
invested in the downtown square.
Mayor Hanna stated the leases were going to play an important part in their ability to build a
parking deck on that lot, which they were doing some studies on now. They would be leasing
more spaces as time went on, because they were going to have more spaces.
Alderman Daniel stated she did not see an overall picture here. She thought if they started
leasing out the spaces it would start effecting general pinch on public participation. People who
come to the Farmers Market. She was concerned about leasing those out until they looked at the
overall picture.
City Council Minutes
August 15; 2000
Page 5
Alderman Russell stated he understood the concerns of businesses around the downtown area.
He has spoken with at least one business owner down there had he completely understood the
concerns about customer parking, especially after the lease of the parking spaces to NBC. He
was not categorically opposed to any leases of the downtown parking spaces;ftpwever, since
there was a comprehensive parking plan in the works he thought it would be more appropriate to
consider these leases after that plan was developed He apologized and took one-eighth of the
responsibility of having leased those parking spaces to NBC without a plan being in place and
without asking the Parking Management Coordinator what she thought about it. He thought
more leases might make the situation worse. ' •
Alderman Russell moved to table the item. Alderman Daniel seconded the motion. Upon
roll call the motion failed by a vote of 4-5-0. Reynolds, Austin, Davis,.Trumbo, and Mayor
Hanna voting nay.
Alderman Austin stated some cities gave incentives to corporations to locate in there city. If they
were going to bring items to council they needed to vote on them. Up or down.
Alderman Santos did not believe it was time for them to be voting. He did not believe they had
enough information. He was concerned they were going to kill the business downtown if they
did not protect public parking for customers.
Alderman Austin asked if he was protecting them from themselves. If the owners were leasing
spaces so they could have business.
Alderman Young stated the whole purpose of having an overall policy to help decide these
things. These leases may be just fine, if they had an overall policy. The policy needed to address
more than just the square. It needed to address Dickson Street. Some day it would have the
same kind of problems. If the parking deck was constructed what would happen to these lease.
Who would have priority. There were a lot of questions that were unanswered.
Alderman Austin asked how long they had been dealing with the parking issue and how many
other potential leases are out there.
Mr. Maguire replied they had started dealing with this about April or May of this year. His take
on this was that the leases were for property owners that owned property on the west side of the
square. That was the only request that they had. It was probably the only ones they would
consider. He did not expect any from the Bank. He did expect a request from Merryship to lease
to tenant in the condos in the Campbell Bell building. Those leases would be held to the area
along the alley. The retailers that were on the agenda, he viewed them as protecting their
customers. Not someone's employee spaces. The policy issue was political bull
0001(35
City Council Mmutes
August 15, 2000
Page 6
Alderman Davis asked how far along they were on developmg the policy.
Mr. Maguire stated he had just given them the policy.
Alderman Reynolds stated they should be proud that NBC came to the square He did not think
they had another business that they could compare to NBC or them needing the thirteen parking
spaces. He was in favor of the leases, but he would like to limit the number of leases per owner
or business, so the public would not loose all the spaces.
Mayor Hanna stated he did not believe they were leasing the spaces for themselves. He thought
they were leasing it for their customers. They had been advised that the city would not police
those spaces and that they would have to do their own.
Alderman Trumbo stated if they were going to have feasibility to float a bond issue to add a deck
to the parking lot. There were not gomg to get a debt rating by bond rating agency to float a bond
issue unless they had leases to provide cash flow to repay the debt. He thought this was a
preparatory step to get the leases and cash flow in place. He thought the policy could come later
in the bond issue. They had to have substantial lease revenue as a repayment source in order to
float a bond.
Alderman Darnel stated she did not agree with his reasoning. She thought a bond agency would
see that it was a good investment. She was not against helping their busmesses. She thought the
city should be very actively involved. She was against doing it piece mill this way.
Alderman Russell stated there was a member of the city staff call the Parking Manger who has
expressed interest in developing a policy. She thought it would take a month or two to come up
with the policy. He was wilting to wait until then to consider the lease. He could not vote for
this tonight because of the lack of the policy. He stated he would like to vote for this after a
policy was in place.
Alderman Austin stated it seemed to him that when someone made an application to the city for
something that had no policy on the books. They were operatmg on what the accepted policy is
and they stopped that and started wntmg policies then they were acting m bad faith. The strongly
felt they needed to vote those up or down.
Alderman Santos stated this was not political bull coming from this side of the room. He and his
colleague were concemed about preserving public parking downtown. They were only asking
that they look before they leap.
Mr. Maguire stated the policy was that they were leasing to property owners on the west side of
the square. As far as it being political, let him suggest to them that if they wanted to micro
•
City Council Minutes.
August 15, 2000
Page 7
manage city employees, show him in the policy where they could do that. They were managing
his business and his employees. He did not appreciate that. He thought it was political.
a i
'Alderman Santos replied he thought Mr. Maguire worked for them. And that they represented
the public and he was supposed to represent the public and not himself.
'
Mr. Maguire replied he did. 3
A se
• Mayor Hanna asked for public comment. -
Mr. John Lewis, Bank of Fayetteville, stated they had been involved in this discussion about
leasing the parking spaces behind their bank. His first comment would be to congratulate the
board on leasing spaces to NBC. That was the essential ingredient that got a run down building
remodeling into something the entire community could be proud of. He was at channel five on
Sunday, and the first thing he had noticed was that they had designated parking spaces at the
mall. It was important to them to have access to their vehicles and the studio. The first step was
to accommodate a new citizen to their city and to allow them to conduct their business the way
they needed to do that. He was concerned about parking on the square for thirty years. He could
remember when the parking problem on the square was that no one wanted to park on the square
and the landscape problem on the square was that they had to get the grass out of the cracks of
the sidewalk. They had seen great progress from aJoint effort of tax payers for voting taxes upon
themselves to build the Continuing Education Center and all the other civic improvement that
had been built downtown. He concurred with the number of leases that they were looking at. He
supported that. The bank had made a decision not to ask the city for any leases. They would like
for the lot to be run as a short term parking lot. The lot was not for his convenience. He did not
park in that parking lot because that was for the customers of the bank and for Town and
Country. They were going to have to use the trolley more until they could get all the parking
problems downtown solved. He concurred with these leases. The bank was not going to ask for
any spaces. What they had asked the city to do was to consider more short tern parking so their
customers could use them. It was not for the benefit of the employees or the management of the
bank. It was for the benefit of their customers and the other customers of business in the
downtown area. He would like to see more short term parking. It was a difficult decision.
Mr. Jeff Erf, resident, asked if the Parking Management Coordinator's opinion was sought for
this lease and the other leases.
Alderman Austin stated he did not want to get into that issue, because he thought that was in-
house issue. The management that reported to the Mayor were present to answer to the public.
He did not want toexamine what they did in-house.
Mr. Maguire replied she reported directly to Ms. Cramer in the Accounting. There were some
1
000167
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 8
issues within the city that they did not consult with second and third level management. They
would consult with them if they thought they would have input. In this case they did not see any
input in there.
Mr. Erf stated there had been a lot of talk about parking spaces. He thought one of the selling
points for the Town Center was that they would be providing parking for the downtown area.
What was the sudden interest m parking spaces.
Mayor Hanna replied the sudden interest in parking spaces was the fact that they gotten some
renovation on the west side of the square and those people have requested parking spaces. They
have had a lot of parking congestion around the square because of the construction both on the
pnvate building and the Town Center. The Town Center parkmg would not be ready until April.
It would relieve a lot of parking problems in the downtown area. He stated they were also
planning on decking the lot behind the west side of the square. One of the things they were
trying to do was to get it set up so they could sell a bond issue that could be supported by the
revenues of the parking.
Mr. Erf reminded them that it was public parking. He had concerns that if all the business started
leases spaces then they were going to limit parking for everyone. He questioned the enforcement
issue.
Mayor Hanna stated it would not be a city issue, it would be up to the person who leased the
space.
Ms. Liz Fulton, Town and County Shop, stated her family had been in business on the square for
forty years. They had seen a lot of business come and go over the years. They had seen a lot
more retail businesses go then they have seen come. They were positive about the square, their
customers loved conung to the square. More and more she was hearing them say that they would
have stopped but they had not been able to find parking. This hurt her busmess. What they were
asking for was short term parking spaces for their customers So her customer would believe that
they would have a good chance of finding a parking space. They wanted those spaces to be short
term and not for employee that had time to plug the meters. They did not allow their employees
for to park near the square. She was not asking for her employees or herself. It was important
for retail to have designed spaces for retail.
Alderman Trumbo stated he use to work on the square. Most of the people parking in the lot
they were discussing tonight were employees on the square.
Ms. Fulton stated most of those spaces were designed as long term parking. There was only a
small area near the bank and her store that were short term parking meters. The problem was the
employees that were working in the area.
4 vl vlij,
City Council Minutes -'
August 15, 2000
Page 9
Alderman Davis stated one of the reasons his business had to leave the downtown area was
because of the lack of parking. Their customers could not get close enough to come to their
office. He thought they should allow these applicants to have these spaces.
Alderman Austin stated they had a problem with managing success. It was a goodproblem to
have. These were good problems for Fayetteville to have.
Alderman Trumbo moved to approve the resolution as presented. Alderman Davis
seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion carried by a vote of 5-4-0. Russell, Daniel,
Santos, and Young voting nay. •
RESOLUTION 114-00 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
DAVID AND CATHY, INC.: A resolution approving a lease agreement with David and Cathy,
Inc. located at 21 S. Block Street for the lease of two parking spaces.
Alderman Trumbo moved to approve the resolution as presented. Alderman Reynolds
seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion carried by a vote of 5-4-0. Russell, Daniel,
Santos, and Young voting nay.
RESOLUTION 115-00 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
AD 00-24: A resolution approving Administrative Item AD 00-24.00 submitted by Jay Studer on
behalf of Kappa Sigma Fraternity to change the name of West William Street behind the Kappa
Sigma house (between University Ave. and the alley to the west) to Whiteside Street in honor of
Charlie B. Whiteside III.
Alderman Daniel stated she was against changing street names. She was not in favor of this.
She had asked the fraternity to find some other way to honor Mr. Whiteside. ;t et.
s • l` ..R i :.. r
-
Alderman Santos asked if they had received a reply from the University or the Fire Department.
•
Mr. Tim Conklin, Planning Director, stated he had contacted Vice Chancellor Richard Hudson.
His statement had been that they were pleased that the city was considering -honoring Mr.
Whiteside and they would support renaming the street, if that was what the City Council had
decided. If the city council decided not to rename the street, they would encourage the fraternity
to find a different way to honor Mr. Whiteside. Mr. Gary Smith, University Transit, was not
opposed to the street name change. University Police Department was not opposed to it.
Arkansas Highway Department, this was an institutional drive. They did maintain that segment
of Williams Street. They were opposed to it.
L
1
000169
Mayor Hanna asked if there were any residents on that street.
Mr. Conklin replied there were no houses on Williams Street.
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 10
Mayor Hanna stated the street was bound by a cemetery on one side and the other side had the
University Parking lot and the fratemity property. There was one lot that faced University that
was vacant.
Alderman Santos asked if they were requesting the other block of Williams to change too. If
they were changing one block he would like to change the next block. He noted it did not have
any residents on it.
Alderman Trumbo stated he had served on the Board of Student Affairs at the University of
Arkansas with Mr. Whiteside. He would be abstainmg of the vote because they worked for the
same stock exchange company.
Alderman Reynolds asked who West Williams was and why the street had been named after him.
Ms. Paula Marmon', Board of Evergreen Cemetery and Washington County Historic
Preservation Society, any street that was named after a person in the central part of the town was
probably histonc The street was named after the family of James H. Williams. He purchased
the property which now house the Soundware House and Underwood. In 1881 he had built a
home on Dickson Street. He was a banker. He was hsted in the history books of Fayetteville.
They had been a prominent family on Dickson Street. At first she had been opposed to it.
Evergreen Cemetery was is the burial place of many of the founding contnbutors of Fayetteville.
It was very important to the history of Fayetteville and to the State. They had been worlang with
families trying to restore some of the monuments. To restore these sites is very expensive. If
they could encourage people to take ownership it would preserve this for the city. It was not
something the city was obligated to do They had two main neighbors there. The cemetery,
which was very susceptible to vandalism. She had asked the fraternity to enter into an agreement
with the cemetery. The fraternity would agree to do all in their power to keep the street in a
condition that would serve as a source of pride to the men of Kappa Sigma and Mr. Whiteside.
They would enter mto an informal neighborly agreement with the Board of the Historic
Evergreen Cemetery and to adopt the cemetery as an ongoing community project. This would
involve helping to watch out for vandalism and inappropriate behavior in the cemetery and to
report such activity to the police and to the Board. We further agree to work with and under the
direction of the board on and on going annual project in the cemetery. If the remaining portion of
William St. is ever in jeopardy they would join with the community to make sure the remaimng
portion was preserved If they had one portion that was preserved then his memory is still in
tack. She urged them that this was a turning pomt in time. Would not cost them anything to help
insure the cemetery was watched out for. The Heritage Committee helped them to erect a fence
. - L-
')�I�
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 11
on the north side of the property which has help considerably. They were able to find someone
who was dedicated and interested as a grounds keeper to was doing'a good job and he was
locking and unlocking the gates. The bicycle cops also policed the cemetery. Still there is
vandalism.
In response to questions from Alderman Russell, Ms. Marinoni stated she had written the letter
with the current president. They were in full agreement. This did not bind the city, but she
wanted it documented. It would be reading into the fraternity. minutes. She thought it was a very
positive partnership for the future. The Board of Evergreen Cemetery are for this under these
conditions.
Alderman Davis stated his concern was what kind of house this would be in a few years. Most
houses when through cycles. He did not think they could expect any fraternity to help them
forever, because of the change in membership
Ms. Marinom stated she wanted it in writing. There was competition nationally to stand out as a
chapter. This chapter of Kappa Sigma has seen very prominent national recognition. This was
high profile project and would be in their best interest to be a part of this now. She stated she
was aware of the risk. The opportunity far out weigh the risk. The had the fraternity as a partner
was a situation they wanted to take advantage of at this time. They needed them to help them..
Alderman Austin stated this was a win win situation. Even if they quit helping in two years, they
had received two years free help.
Mr. Jay Snider, Kappa Sigma, stated they took a lot of pride in community serve. He stated it
would be taken care of.
Alderman Santos moved to pass the resolution. Alderman Russell seconded the motion.
Upon roll call the motion carried by a vote of 6-0-1. Trumbo abstaining.
RESOLUTION 116-00 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
CRAFI'ON TULL AND ASSOCIATES: A resolution censuring the Board of Directors of
Crafton, Tull, and Associates for the firing of Fayetteville Alderman Cyrus Young.
Alderman Santos stated the firing of Cyrus Young by Crafton Tull was a very public gesture by a
firm who thrived on public business firing a public figure. In the letter from Crafton Tull to Mr.
Young it directly implied that the interest of Crafton Tull should have been the interest he was
representing rather than the interest of his constituents. He stated he would like to remove
sections two and three from the proposed resolution, which addressed punishing Crafton Tull
He wanted to remove any mention of punishing Crafton Tull and to leave it as a censure of their
000171
actions.
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 12
Alderman Santos moved to amend the resolution to remove sections two and three.
Alderman Russell seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion carried by a vote of 6-0-
1, Young abstaining.
Alderman Trumbo stated it was incumbent upon anyone elected to keep frivolous items from
being brought to the city council Especially to listen to the City Attorney's legal advise. If a
city alderman brought forward an issue knowing that something slanderous might be said m a
public forum, then the City of Fayetteville opened itself up for a law suite. He thought it was
incumbent upon all aldermen elected to not bnng forward something of this nature. He did not
agree with what he was trying to do. City government was not suppose to be a forum for special
interest.
Alderman Russell asked Mr. Rose if his legal advise change any with the amendment to the
resolution.
Mr. Rose asked them to ask themselves these questions about what they were doing. Number
one, does Crafton Tull have contracts or the expectancies of doing business within this
community. Two, do they had knowledge of those contracts. Third, what was their motive in
passing this resolution. If that motive was to induce or to cause other to breach some existing
relationships with Crafton Tull or to harm m anyway their ability to do busmess within the
community. They had to examine their own motives and what they had said to others that might
come to light in any trail. Have they caused any damage to Crafton Tull by their actions. Have
they lost profits or has their reputation been harmed in the community. If their answer was yes to
those questions, then they had just been found guilty of tort, tortuous interference with a business
relationship or expectancy. The truth was not a complete defense. At issue is your motivation.
It was not just what they say, but the reason for which you say it. Law was a little confusing.
This would be a jury issue. He could not get it thrown out on a summary. They could nsk the
tax dollars of the city on the faith of that jury ruling in your favor. He did not think it was in the
best legal interest for the city to pick a fight if they did not have to. His piece was only legal.
His positive advise, if they wanted to take some affirmative action, he would feel more secure if
they passed some general resolution, that was supportive of either Cyrus Young or a particular
pnnciple rather than derogatory in any way toward Crafton Tull.
Alderman Austin stated he supported Cyrus Young. He respected him as a person, because he
was honest. He like his bull dog spirit on the things he was convicted on. He had noticed Cyrus
had abstained on the projects that Crafton Tull had done.
Alderman Santos stated this was not just about Cyrus, this was about private corporations
influencing City government by punishing the employees for representing the public interest over
_.
00.01v
1
7_2
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 13
the interest of the firm. He would like a censure, a slap on the wrist. No more than what they
gave Red China over Tibet.
•
Alderman Davis stated he did not want to do anything that was going to jeopardize the city.
Alderman Santos stated he did not want to either, that was whyhe had backed down on the
punishment of business!. That was not the intent of this'resolution! It was to censure thein for
this one public action.
.
t 4
Alderman Reynolds stated he liked Cyrus, but this was a personas judgment and he thought
Cyrus should handle this with Craflon Tull himself. He did not think k the city should be involved
in it. He would not support the resolution at all. 7
Alderman Daniel stated she was also concemed about Cyrus. She had agreed to bring this to the
pubhc and to let it be on the agenda. She did not believe she had ever keep a request from the
public, even if she did not agree with it personally.
A citizen stated she did not understand. People were afraid of losing their job. If a person was
trying to do their job that they had been elected to do, why they should have to fear losing their
job.
Mr. Rose stated Mr. Young and the ability to hire an attorney and to do what ever he felt was
appropriate legally against his former employer for any wrong which had done against him.
The citizen did not believe that it was a personal thing. She did not understand.
Alderman Austin stated the council was not the party to deal with this type of issue. They were
not a party to that act That was between Cyrus and Crafton Tull He did not believe they were
the remedy for the differences between the two.
•
Alderman Santos reminded them, he was talking about the affect on the city. They were not
taking about employee and employer, personnel things. They were discussing the chilling affect
on free speech and control of elected officials. It was not a personal thing. It was not Cyrus. It
was bigger than that. It was an affront to the city. It was an affront to democracy.
Mr. Rick Crochran, an area resident, stated he hoped the motion before them would drop and that
they would not vote it up or down. He would like to see them not vote it. He thought they had
expressed their vote of confidence. He was concerned at individuals could pay a price for doing
what they felt in their heart. Following the ordinance and laws and upholding those. He did not
think what he heard in the media explained everything, but what he had seen, he felt that it was
not right. He did not want to involve the city and the public in a lawsuits that they could not win..
000173
Mr. Rose had given them good legal advise and council.
City Council Mmutes
August 15, 2000
Page 14
Mr. John DuVal, an area resident, stated he was glad they had amended the resolution. He did
not believe they needed to enter into a contest of whether they could beat up on Crafton Tull He
did not believe the way the resolution was now proposed was a threat to Crafton Tull, but it did
tell them they did wrong They did wrong to the city. He did not believe he was spouting a
political philosophy either. He thought it was the interest of all the citizens of Fayetteville to
make it known it was wrong to interfere with the elective process. He thought that was good for
the country. This was a basic principle the country could not exist, if freedom of speech was
threatened. It was intimidating to be treated with a lawsuits and if for that reason they declined
to vote, he could understand. If they were womed about the votes or the respect of the citizens
of the city they would vote for the resolution. The city did want to be defended by Just speaking
what was nght and what was good.
Alderman Trumbo moved to deny the resolution as amended. Alderman Reynolds
seconded the motion.
Alderman Russell stated some of the members of the public had a grievance against a firm with
which the city does business with on a regular basis. These members of the public have
approached an alderman with a request to discuss this grievance with the city council at a public
meeting. He believed it was their job to listen to the public concerns and to do so with respect.
After doing so they may chose to either act upon those concerns tonight or to act upon them in
the future or the tell the members of the public that they understood the members of the public
that they understood their concems but the believed that this was not the appropriate form or time
for them to be addressed. While he supported the public right to air their grievances about a firm
with which we spend their tax money. He felt uncomfortable subjecting the city or himself to a
possible lawsuits by taking any categorical action against Crafton Tull in an official capacity. He
would be opposing the resolution on those grounds. His personal views had been made public.
With every vote they took they had to weigh the principles involved against the risks of public
back lash or a number of other things. He thought there was a great deal of principle in this
matter, but he did not believe it was worth risking a lawsuits for the city.
Alderman Austin asked if they would be best served by voting on the resolution or by tabling the
issue.
Mr. Rose replied there was some finality opposed to tabling it.
Alderman Russell stated his personal preference would be to table it. He did not want anyone to
construe a "no" vote on the resolution as a vote in support as a vote in support of what happened
to Cyrus.
City.Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 15
Upon roll call the motion passed by a vote of 6-1-1. Santos voting nay,. Young abstaining..
RESOLUTION FAILED. ' if ` , i ` `�
s -•2 c� r
CREDIT CARDS: A resolution establishing credit/debit card convenience fees.
'. 17 `} sp
Mr. Rose stated this would be a resolution to allow credit/ debit cards to be used when making
certain payments to the city of Fayetteville and establishing a convenience fee for such use.
e 4
Mr. Steve Davis; Budget and Research, stated they were asking to have a resolution passed to
authorize them accept credit cards for payments in the business office. What this will do will
offer the citizens another payment vehicle. This would allow people to pay their water bill with a
credit or debt card. In order to use your credit card to pay the water, they would need to come to . .
the business office State law required that they pass the charge on. They could not absorb the
Cost. There would be a nominal two percent fee. The bank charged the city 1.97%. They then
had the cost associated with the telephone line.
In response to questions from aldermen, Mr. Davis stated currently they had $65,000-68,000 a
year write-off in the Water and Sewer Fund. By having the ability to accept credit cards they may
be able to avoid some of that. They had planned to have a credit card machine in the Parks and
Recreation, Solid Waste, and the Animal Shelter divisions.
Ms. Nan Simmons, an area resident, stated this was good idea. She would like to see it applied
to the Animal Services Division Many times a resident coming to get their animal out, their
fines were so large that it was a hardship for them to come up with that much cash. She would
like to see it extended to them.
Alderman Reynolds stated they were going to experiment with this for sixty to ninety days, then
phase it in.
Alderman Austin moved to approve the resolution. Alderman Daniel seconded the motion.
Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION 117-00 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
CREDIT CARDS• A resolution accepting a proposal from the Bank of Fayetteville for
credit/debit card processing services, approval of and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to
sign a Visa/MasterCard Merchant Agreement and setting convenience fees associated with
credit/debit card acceptance.
Alderman Trumbo moved to approve the resolution. Alderman Reynolds seconded the
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 16
motion. Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION 118-00 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
SISTER CITIES: A report on the Sister Cities Committee's status, program, and recent trip to
the Dominican Republic.
Alderman Russell stated as a member of the Sister Cities Committee that went on the trip. The
city's sister city is San Diego in the Dominican Republic. Their relationship with San Diego was
dormant until a couple of years ago when a couple of went on a trip to revitalize the relationship.
Seven of them had gone down there in June. He introduced a video of their trip.
NO ACTION REQUIRED.
WINGS AIR, INC.
A resolution approving a lease agreement with Wings Air, Inc. for an above ground facility
which they will locate south of the terminal buildmg ramp. This will allow self-service fueling
by the pilot using a credit card. Annual compensation will be $384.00 for the ground area with
three three-year renewal options. Flowage fees will be remitted to the City as set forth in Section
91.16 of the Code of Fayetteville.
Ms. Alett Little, Economic Development, explained this would be a self-service fueling facility.
It would allow credit card purchase of fuel twenty-four hours a day. She wanted to make them
aware of two things. There were two contingencies on this lease. One was that Mr. Shawsha and
Wings Air must receive approval through the large scale development process. They were on the
agenda for plat review for tomorrow. The second contingency was that they must have a license
from Air British Petroleum in order to set up the tanks. One of the things they needed to get
approval was this lease. There was one item Mr. Shawsha wanted to bnng to their attention
tonight. There was an eight hundred dollar fee in the city's code for non-residential
development. The area they were discussing for placement of the tank was fourteen by thirty-two
feet. It was a very small area. He had disagreement that it should cost eight hundred dollars to
get that approval The main thing that they city would do would be to coordinate the utilities and
make sure that the tanks were a save distance from buildmgs.
Alderman Santos agreed that they were not getting eight hundred dollars worth of review on this
project. He asked if they needed to amend the resolution.
Alderman Russell stated the agenda stated they were only approving the lease. He asked if under
the Freedom of Information Act if they had the proper notification for the fee waiver.
Mr. Rose stated he was not concerned about the freedom of information act. What he was
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 17
concerned about was.their own Rules and regulations, which required them to go further than
legally required to inform citizens of the items to be considered by the City Council. He was not
sure if it was appropriate to consider at this point. It would take an ordinance to waive the fees.
Mr Tim Conklin, City Planner, stated typically he did not accept an application without
accepting a fee.
Ms. Little stated there was no question that it needed to reviewed. The question was should the
fee be eight hundred dollars. This could be considered an economic development matter.
Frequently there were incentives for economic development activities. She stated those were not
normally published in advanced.
Mr. Rose suggested that they process the large scale development tomorrow and make the
approval contingent upon payment or waiver of the fee.
In response to questions from Alderman Austin, Ms. Little stated they currently had an operator
on the field who did serve fuel to airplanes. What they did not have was the ability for people to
self serve. They also did not twenty-four hour operation. She did not know of a twenty-four
hour operation. They would give them something else to offer people. They had offered the
opportunity to the fix base operator about three years ago. They had looked into it and made a
decision not to offer this service.
In response to questions from Alderman Reynolds, Ms. Little stated when they had fuel sales on
the Airport, they collected a fee that went back into the Airport Fund. The more fuel they were
able to sell the more fund would go back into the Airport Fund. The city was not making any of
the investment in the equipment. This was only a land lease. They were offering a service that
was not currently available. This was City of Fayetteville property. The Airport Board had acted
on this at their August 3 meeting. The Fire Chief and the State Fire Marshall had signed off on
this. •
1 II.
Mr. Kenneth Shawsho, applicant, stated they presently had a business on the field. They were
going into their third year. They saw an opportunity for growth with Fayetteville. It has been a
lengthy process. The city of Fayetteville had an ordinance that exceeded the State ordinance.
This drove the overall project costs from forty thousand to over ninety thousand dollars. They
were asking for the fee waiver because it was going to be on leased property. They had brought
their avionic shop to where they were not offering maintenance as well as avionics to the field.
They were attracting aircraft from other states. They felt this would be a good and valuable asset
for Fayetteville As far as the market was concerned. This would bring more aircraft to the
airport. They felt that adding another business to the airport as another step in the direction to
attract more business to the airport. He presented drawing illustrating their proposed project.
000177
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 18
In response to questions from Alderman Austin, Mr. Shawsho stated they did not intend to have
unfair competition, however, they did intend to make the business work.
Mr. Burl Thompson, Manager of the Springdale Airport, stated he had learned that they needed a
healthy FBO. This airport almost died when they lost the airlines. Their was only a small
amount of profit bemg made now. The fuel sales were only about ten percent of what they used
to be. He knew this was not the thing to do. It was hard to make a living at an FBO . If they
allow this, the current FBO would be cutting their hours and services, then things would start
going down hill. They were going to down grade their service to the jets. They were
jeopardizing their jet fuel sales. He felt they needed to support their current FBO one hundred
percent
Mr. Chuck Chadwick, Fayetteville Air Service, he explained the FBO took care of fuelmg the
aircraft and the passengers and pilots. They sold fuel to pay for the personnel to provide all those
services. They provided a nice environment by the sale of fuel. Fuel was the cash cow at an
airport. Mr Shawsho wanted to sale fuel, but he did not want to provide any of the other
services they provided. They had a twenty-four hour FBO it was out at the regional airport. Their
company ran it. Their company ran the one at Springdale. It was not twenty-four hours. There
was a good reason for that. The market did not pay them to. Their fuel prices were consistent
and they were fair. They could land at Springdale or Fayetteville and pay a twenty-five dollar
call out fee. That was the normal practice in the aviation business, where the market did not pay
for someone to say open twenty-four hours a day. There were small airports that had this type of
tank operations. Ms. Little nor Ken where there three years ago when there had been discussion
on where or not they were going to put in a twenty-four hour fueling tank They had not been
offered that option. It had been talked about in great detail. Mr. Fredenck had done study, rt had
been determined that it was not feasible for the city or the FBO to do it. It was not that they were
offered the opportunity to do it and turned it down. This Fixed Base Operator did not tum down
that opportumty. The only good benefit the Fayetteville airport had was the traffic going to and
from the University and the football games. They had for the past three years catered free food
the pilots and passengers to the games. What Mr. Shawsho wanted to do was get the fuel sales
from the games and not provide the service. They had nearly one hundred aircraft in about on
hour and half during a game. Their job was to make sure they had enough personnel to park the
aircraft, take proper fuel orders for all different kinds of aircraft. They provided transporting on
the ramp for passenger and pilots to and from the FBO. They paid for these serves by selling
fuel. Mr. Shawsho had stated he wanted to put in fuel later. The city had spent a substantial
amount of money to construct a fuel faun. They were paying rent on the fuel farm now. The city
had not investment in these tanks. His obligation to the city was thirty-two dollars a month. They
paid more than that for the pilots to watch tv. It was not a level playing field. He was either
going to make a heck of a good profit or have fuel so low they could not compete. The minimum
standards state that they should have uniformed linemen on duty eight hours a day. That he shall
provide heat and air-conditioned lounge. None of that was m the proposal. He stated they would
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 19
like to move into the terminal.
Alderman Trumbo stated his argument sounded good, but why would the Airport Board vote
unanimously for this.
Mr. Chadwick stated he had not be present during the meeting. They were so eager to get
something going that they did not want to turn down anyone. He was not sure the Airport Board
understood the FFA regulations. They did not have an exclusive right to sell fuel, but what the
grant assurances do say was that they would not treat them unequally. He asked that they not
give them a different standard to go by. '
Alderman Austin asked Mr. Chadwick if the Airport Board was dissatisfied with their service.
Mr. Chadwick replied he thought some of the members of the board were dissatisfied with their
inability to push them into ways they were not willing to go. He stated the passengers and pilots
that came to his FBO seemed very satisfied. There was a complaint box. In the past three years
they had only had one complaint. They were not going to satisfy one hundred percent of the
people all the time, but they wanted to make good business decisions and satisfy the people you
could satisfy.
Alderman Austin asked if they approved this lease would his company be able to survive.
Mr. Chadwick replied they could not if they continued to spend the kind of money the were
spending on a month basis. Two things were going to happen. They were going to reduce their
services that they provide to such a degree that there were going to be no services provided on
the field or they were going to be asking for concessions from the City of Fayetteville to give
them a deal they could operate under as far as their.rent was concerned.
Alderman Austin stated he did not believe it was in the city's best interest to pull back services
on an airport they were trying to build.
� 1 I4
Mr. Chadwick stated when the grant assurances stated that they shall treat everyone of alike
business equally, it didn't work when -they had one business providing all the services and one
only providing fuel. He added this lease did not even have to come to the council. Alett, had
assured him that he would have more of a forum than Just the Airport Board,if that was what he
requested. His thought was that the Airport Board did not believe that they could turn him down
because of the non-exclusive language of the grant assurances and two they were so eager to be
pro -active to bring business onto the field that they were afraid to turn anyone down
Alderman Austin stated he had been under the assumption that this item would be non- -
controversial issue. This was a tough issue for him.
000179
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 20
In response to questions from Alderman Russell, Mr. Chadwick explained the grant assurances
stated that they could not have an exclusive nght on the airfield to operate any one type of
business. Everyone had a nght to come on and do it. However, they were to treat those types of
businesses equally and hold them to the same standards. They could not treat one to a lower
standard or unfairly. They could deny other business from coming on if there was not adequate
facilities to handle that. There were some exceptions to that, but as a general policy statement
they could not have an exclusive right to operate a business on the field, but they could not
unfairly treat the participates.
Alderman Russell quoted from the Airport Board minutes that Dr. Wallas had stated that it was
not their role to keep someone from going into busmess on the Airport so long as they meet our
standards. Mr. Chadwick was indicating that he did not beheve that the proposal met the mimum
standard in a couple of ways.
Mr. Chadwick stated that he believed m order to be a fuel service provider on that field you had
to have adequate space for the pilots and passengers to be taken care of. The minimum standards
were set by a city ordinance
In response to questions from Alderman Reynolds, Mr. Chadwick stated they provided the same
services at Springdale and Regional. They were building a maintenance facility at Regional. The
fuel prices were the same as Regional and Springdale.
Mr. Shawsha stated they did meet all the minimum standards. They had a lounge, courtesy car,
they did supply maintenance and aviomc needs He submitted that they had more services to
provide at Fayetteville now than Fayetteville Air, with the exception of the fuel. They were
willing to build a tank at the their own expense to further enhance their ability. They did intend
to go into the full service FBO business. The only reason they withdrew their request for the
Airport terminal building location was the length of the process had made it economically
unfeasible to get started and to capture any of the busmess from the football sales. At the point
when they could go into the Jet A business, then they would be going for that business. If
Fayetteville Air wanted to be on equal ground, give them the same opportunity they were asking
for. They were going to a lot of expense. They provided every thing in the fuel and oil sales that
was asked for. They did not have to have a lineman if they had self service. As soon as they
could put a truck in, they would be operating out of their facility across the field. They had all
the required things. They would be operating m conjunction with their other business. All they
wanted to do was expand their horizons and do a good business for the city of Fayetteville.
Alderman Davis stated he did not know enough about what was going on.
Alderman Davis moved to table the item. Alderman Daniel seconded the motion. Upon
roll call the motion carried unanimously.
•
.-
City Council Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 21
ITEM WAS TABLED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
SKATE PARK
A resolution approving a contract with Purkiss-Rose-Rsi for the design and contraction
supervision of the Skate Park.
g,� L •
Alderman Austin asked if the City of Fayetteville's park be unique or would it be a revised plan
from a prior project in California: Had they presented pictures or video of other projects.
..
_
Alderman Russell stated he was on the selection committee. Thirteen firms applied. They
narrowed itdown to five and requested proposal from them. This was the firm that the selection
committee decided on unanimously: The committee decided they were the'most qualified The
firm had submitted a list of their projects. They had approximately one hundred skate parks that
were complete, in progress or under contract A lot of those projects were in California. They
had stated that they would conduct at least two public meetings in Fayetteville with some of their
staff to get input from Fayetteville citizens on the design of the park.
Alderman Austin asked how they were going to determine neighborhood concerns and collect the
data.
Mr. Terry Gulley, Parks and Recreation, stated they had a subcommittee which had
recommended Walker Park as the site. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board had met at the
site. There had not been any concerns expressed to them or the Parks Board about the site
selection. The design of the park would be brought up at the public meetings.
Alderman Austin asked if they were going to get out into the neighborhood and find out what
their concerns were and were they going to address them.
Ms. Brenda Thiel, Parks and Recreation, stated she had concems about the Architectural firm. A
good firm was really needed that has worked in this area to facilitate these public meetings. She
felt they needed to spend the money up front to get their expertise so they could plan a park that
the kids could enjoy and that will last.
Mr. Venable stated they did have a local firm hired to do part of the engineenng work. So not all
of the money was going to the firm in California.
Alderman Davis moved to approve the resolution. Alderman Trumbo seconded the
motion. Upon roll call the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION 119-00 AS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
The meeting adjourned at 10:05 p.m.