HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-07 MinutesA Public Forum
April 7, 1992,
West Mountain,
.«MINUTES OF PUBLIC -FORUM
meeting of the City Board. of Directors vas held on
at 7:00 p.m. in the Board of Directors Room, 113
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
thi
Mayor Vorsanger opened the Public Forum at 7:00 p.m. explaining the
purpose of this meeting was for citizen input on non -agenda items.
Mayor Vorsanger reported that the Board was to have their picture
taken to be placed in a time capsule for 100 years.
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
Director Nash reported that she had received questions regarding
the Vegetation Management Plan and suggested this be a topic for
discussion at the next agenda session. _
Mayor Vorsanger presented a letter from Barbara Moorman regarding
the progress of the Vegetation Management Plan and asked that Staff
review and respond to the letter.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
lOV
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF TEE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A regular meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was
held on Tuesday, April 7, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. in the Directors' Room
of the City Administration Building at 113 West Mountain Street,
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
PRESENT: Mayor Fred Vorsanger; Assistant Mayor Mike Green;
Directors Ann Henry, Dan Coody, Julie Nash, Shell
Spivey and Bob Blackston; City Manager Scott
Linebaugh; City Attorney Jerry Rose; City Clerk
Sherry Thomas; Planning Management Director Alett
Little; Administrative Services Director Ben Mayes;
members of Staff, press, and audience.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor, with seven Directors
present. The Mayor asked those present to stand and recite the
Pledge of Allegiance, further asking that a brief moment of silence
be observed in honor and memory of a great benefactor to the City
of Fayetteville and outstanding individual, Sam Walton.
Mayor Vorsanger introduced special guests present in the audience,
Dr. Yon Min, a visiting Ophthalmologist from Beijing, China. Dr.
Min is being hosted by Dr. J.E. McDonald for eight weeks during her
six month visit to the United States. In addition, there were
students from the University of Arkansas present to observe
governmental operations.
The Mayor welcomed comments on any item on the Agenda. He further
stated that in order to allow equal attention to all items, the
Board requests that comments be limited to 3 minutes per person per
item. He explained that the Agenda for the Board Meeting was set
on the Wednesday before the meeting. Any item a citizen wishes to
be presented to the Board not on this Agenda must be presented at
the next Agenda session or brought up by a Director at that session
for discussion at the following meeting.
OLD BUSINEBB
TWIN CITY TAXI
Mayor Vorsanger reintroduced a request by Code Eleven, Inc., dba
Twin City Taxi, for the Board of Directors to authorise a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the tazi to
operate within the City of Fayetteville.
He reported that a Public Hearing was held at the March 3, 1992
Board of Directors meeting to allow public input on this taxi
request. A copy of the Board minutes are attached as well as any
additional information received on the taxi request. Vorsanger
stated that the Board was being asked to review comments from the
April 7, 1992
Public Hearing and render a decision as far as granting of this
license.
Green, seconded by Nash, made a motion to authorize the Certificate
of Public Convenience and Necessity to Code Eleven, Inc.
Everett Cole, owner of C&H Taxi, addressed the Board asking if in
the event the Board authorizes the granting of this Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity, whether he can raise his rates to
$1.50/mile, matching those of Code Eleven, Inc. without formally
requesting approval from the Board to raise his rates. Cole stated
that he currently charges $1.00/mile (as the crow flies) and 50C
per passenger compared to Code Eleven's $1.50/mile (by meter) and
$1.00 per passenger. In addition; Cole stated that when he began
his service 13 years ago, the use of the City's name in his company
name was prohibited, and he inquired whether this rule applies to
any cab company.
City Attorney Jerry Rose explained that the same laws apply to both.
cab companies, and the rates asked for when applying for such .a
license are approved as part of the application for operating
within the City. Therefore, in order to raise cab rates, C&H would
be required to make formal application to the City for a rate
increase, and that permission could not be unreasonably withheld.
In response to Mayor Vorsanger's question regarding the use of
"City" or "Fayetteville" in the cab company name, City Attorney
Rose responded that he has been unable to find such an ordinance.
He further explained the City Board at the time Mr. Cole's license
was granted probably made this specific request for the reason that
it infers that the City operates the cab company.
Mr. Cole stated that data he collected from approximately 100 of
his customers indicated that very few citizens wanted to pay higher
rates for 24 hour service. Therefore, Cole could not justify
charging higher rates to maintain a 24 hour service. Currently,
Cole sees no emergency need for 24 hour service with the exception
of limited requests from bar patrons after 1:00 to 2:00 a.m. He
further stated that%there is not enough business in the City of
Fayetteville for two cab companies. 'Cole reported that years ago
before he started his company, Fayetteville had 3 or 4 different
cab companies, none,ofwhich were making any money. The companies
gradually dropped out -until the City .had no cab service for 6
months. It was at that time that Mr. Cole began his cab service,
after learning of Ozark Transit's interest to start a cab company
with ridiculous rates'.• ,It is impossible to compete with the
University's Ozark` Transit which receives government aid to
operate. In addition„ Cole. pointed out that the City recently
granted a license for, a 24 hour handicapped taxi service which
serves those not wanting, to summon an ambulance. The airport
limousine service adequately handles the majority of airport
.4
•
•
•
•
104
April 7, 1992
business. It was for these reasons that Mr. Cole supported Twin
City Taxi's move to Springdale as he was losing money.
In response to Mayor Vorsanger's question regarding Twin City Cab
Company, City Attorney Rose responded that they have already
submitted their application which includes their rates. C&H would
be required to modify their permit in order to raise their rates.
Mr. Cole stated that he does not recall submitting his rates with
his application, but he recalls the City set his rates when he
began his service. He has formally requested rate increases twice
in the past.
City Attorney Rose reiterated that it is his understanding that cab
company rates are part of the permitting process and approved by
the Board at the time a permit is granted.
Mayor Vorsanger pointed out the application letter from Twin City
Taxi sets out proposed rates and discounts to senior citizens.;
these rates are automatically approved with the application.
Director Spivey stated that in the spirit of competition and in
allowing the operation of two taxi companies in the City, these
rates should be considered the maximum and not a requirement, and
lower rates could be charged at each company's discretion.
City Attorney Rose responded the ordinance is set up to where
proposed rates of an applying taxi company is one of the
considerations of the Board in granting or denying the permit. The
ordinance currently does not address the setting of maximum or
minimum taxi rates; however, this could be done through amending
the current ordinance.
Director Spivey suggested the Board consider such an ordinance to
allow a ceiling on the rates as well as competitive advantage to a
taxi company that is able to operate efficiently and charge the
lower rates.
Director Henry addressed Mr. Todd, owner of Twin City Taxi Company,
who verified that he is currently unable to cross the City line
into Fayetteville after C&H Cab Company closes even though he is
ready, willing, and able to do so, without the Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity. Further, Henry asked whether
Twin City Taxi Company perceived the need for their service to
Fayetteville basically between the hours of 1:00 and 6:00 a.m.
Mr. Todd responded that his intent is to operate in Fayetteville 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, as they do in Springdale, including the
time between 1:00 and 6:00 a.m. when C&H Tax Company is not
operating. Todd further concurred with Director Spivey regarding
setting maximum rates and explained his company is required to
charge the higher rates due to the quality of his vehicles and
ar
April 7, •1992;
reliable 24 hour service they provide. In addition, Todd refuted
Mr. Cole's statements regarding Twin City's metered service and
practice of running up the fares. The name "Twin City Taxi" has no
connection to the City of Fayetteville; but merely a name they made
up as Fayetteville and Springdale are considered "twin cities"
given their location and approximate equality in size. Todd
further verified that he has not made application for a limousine
service, nor has he ever intended to station a taxi at the airport.
He also stated that Twin City Taxi's dispatch center is located in
the city limits of Fayetteville just north of the Mall on Johnson
Road.
Director Green agreed that whatever rates the Board approves should
be considered maximum rates across the board in order to avoid
discrimination against any one particular company. Green further
stated that the City of Fayetteville is grateful to C&H Taxi
Company for their service over the last 13 years. He believes that
this type of competition may have a positive effect on both cab
companies in that it will probably increase citizen use of the cab
services. _
Mayor Vorsanger asked if Director Green wished to amend his motion
to include the maximum rates.
Green, seconded by Nash, amended his motion to make the proposed
rates of Twin City Taxi the maximum allowed rate and to apply to
all cab companies.
Marilyn O'Neal, employee of C&H Taxi Company, addressed the Board
requesting that they consider that the majority of citizens who use
a cab are elderly on fixed incomes and should not be required to
pay a higher price to ride in newer equipment. In addition, O'Neal
expressed her concern that if cab drivers can not make money, they
will quit and Fayetteville may once. again find itself without any
taxi service.
Mayor Vorsanger called for a vote on the amendment to the proposed
motion.
Upon roll call, the amendment to the motion passed by a vote of 7
to 0.
With no further comments, Mayor Vorsanger then called for a vote on
the motion to authorize a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity to Twin City Taxi.
s
Upon roll call, the motion passed by a vote of 7 to 0.
RESOLUTION 44-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
t
164
April 7, 1992
NEW BUSINESS
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Vorsanger introduced consideration of items which may be
approved by lotion, or contracts and leases which can be approved
by resolution, and which may be grouped together and approved
simultaneously under a "Consent Agenda."
A. Minutes of the March 17, 1992 regular Board meeting;
B. A resolution approving Change Orders 2 i 3 with Branco
Enterprises for the Fayetteville Nigh School Construction
Project in the amount of $34,411;
Change Order 2 for $29,217 includes the cost of rock
excavation as well as credit for anticipated soils
undercutting and backfill. Change Order 3 for $5,194 adds the
cost of construction of a retaining wall in the basement of
the existing high school building.
The City has approximately $190,000 remaining in the school
escrow account. After these funds have been expended, the
City will have depleted all the money authorized and available
for this project.
C. A resolution authorising the City to pay half of the
construction costs of Cornell Street as an easement to Davis
Park in the amount of $10,933, and approval of a budget
adjustment. In addition, this resolution would authorise the
City to pay the cost of the street in Davis Park from Cornell
Street to Princeton Street in the amount of $22,500 and
approve an easement across Davis Park to RE/MAX for extension
of Columbia Avenue;
The total cost for these Davis Park related items is $33,433
of which the $22,500 will be funded in the 1993 budget
process. The 1992 budget adjustment of $10,933 will be for
street construction and is available from the balance of the
cost of the Transportation Study which came in under budget.
Both the Parks Board and Staff recommend approving these
construction costs for Davis Park.
RESOLUTION 45-92 AB RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
D. A resolution approving the renewal of the Lake Fayetteville
Boat Dock Operator's contract with Jim Black in the amount of
$15,840 for the period beginning April 6, 1992 and terminating
on December 31, 1992;
April 7, 1992.,:.
Staff recommends --approval .of this contract renewal which
includes a 4% increase from last year's contract amount.
RESOLUTION 46-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
E. A resolution approving the establishment of an Economic
Development Reserve Account to designate surplus Economic
Development funds with the City Board controlling the
destination of these funds;
Surplus funds for 1991 of $8,978.18 were reverted back to the
City by the Chamber. Staff recommends establishing the
Economic Development Reserve Account for these funds.
RESOLUTION 47-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
A resolution awarding a contract based on RFP 91-15 for
maintenance of radio equipment to Motorola, Inc., at a cost of
$3,400 per month for a two year period;
The City received two responses to the RFP, and Motorola,
Inc., offered the contract which is most advantageous to the
City. Therefore, Staff recommends awarding the contract to
Motorola, Inc.
G. A resolution awarding Bid 91-69 for the purchase of pumps and
equipment for the.Pollution Control Plant to the low bidder,
American Power and Supply Company, in the amount of $26,322;
Staff recommends awarding the bid.
RESOLUTION 48-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
H. A resolution awarding an engineering contract to DeShazo,
Starek, and Tang, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $36,500.00
for the 1992 CIP Traffic Study plus a contingency of $5,500.00
for anticipated, yet unidentified, intersection analysis for
a total not to exceed $42,000.00;
Staff recommends approving the contract. The study will
review, justify, or change the proposed 5 -year and long range
street construction plans. It shall also establish
priorities, recommendations, 'project rankings, schedules,
scope, and cost estimates for proposed street improvements
and/or construction.
RESOLUTION 49-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
I. Ratification of a Resolution supporting the placement of the
Arkansas School for Mathematicsrand Science on the University
of Arkansas campus at Fayetteville;
•
3
1.86
April 7, 1992
J. A resolution renewing the Blue Cross Blue Shield contract for
group medical, dental, life, AD&D, and LTD insurance plans for
the policy year 5-1-92 through 4-30-93;
Staff recommends approving the renewal of this contract.
There will be no changes to benefit provisions of the policy.
The group medical premium will increase by 15.4% due to cost
trends and projections. Staff recommends using the
retrospective premium refunds held in escrow to fund the
increase, and there will be no increased cost to the
employees.
RESOLUTION 50-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERx'8 OFFICE
E. A resolution approving an engineering contract amendment in
the amount of $19,300.00 with Kilholland Engineering for the
Stubblefield Road/Missouri Creek Drainage project;
Staff recommends approving the amendment to the original May,
1989 contract because changes were requested by the City to
realign Stubblefield Road which included waterline
replacements, negotiations with property owners, sidewalk
construction, and road redesign and engineering costs have
gone up since the original contract was signed.
RESOLUTION 51-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
L. A resolution approving payment of attorney fees to McDermott,
Will and Emery in the amount of $8,823.41 for December 1, 1991
through January 31, 1992 and to the Nibiock Law Firm in the
amount of $7,983.89 for January and February, 1992 for
services rendered on the incinerator disengagement and related
lawsuits;
Staff recommends approving payment of the attorney fees.
Mayor Vorsanger requested that Item "F" be pulled from the Agenda
for further discussion.
Director_ Coody asked that Item "I" be pulled; Director Green
requested that Item "B" be pulled; and Director Nash asked that
Item "L" be removed.
Henry, seconded by Nash, made a motion to approve the consent
agenda, with the removal of Items "B", "F", "I" and "L". Upon roll
call, the resolution passed by a vote of 7 to 0.
ITEM "8"
Director Green stated that since his firm is indirectly involved in
the Fayetteville High School Construction Project, he will need to
abstain from the vote on this particular item.
•
April 7, 1992
Henry, seconded by Blackston, made a motion to approve the
resolution. Upon roll call, the resolution passed by a vote of 6
to 0 to 1, with Director Green abstaining.
RESOLUTION 52-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITYICLERR'S OFFICE
ITEM "F"
Mayor Vorsanger.stated.that due to the total cost of this two year
contractswith Motorola',: Inc., approximately $76,000 to $80,000,
the resolution warranted further discussion. He specifically asked
about the other bids submittethand why Motorola was chosen.
r.
introduced Kathy Stocker, Director of
and head of a team of employees on the
Besides.: Motorola, Smith Two Way also
1
a t
City Manager Linebaugh
Communication Services,
selection committee:' .
submitted a bid.
P•
Kathy Stocker, Director of Communication Services, addressed the
Board stating that the amounts of:the bids received were $3,055.6.0
from Smith Two Way and $3,400 from Motorola. Stocker stated the
subcontractor for Motorola, Allcom, is the only authorized Motorola
service dealer in Northwest Arkansas as well as the only authorized
service and repair ifacility,able to perform warranty work- on
Motorola equipment.' .Motorola provides free factory training to
their subcontractors, and currently have three technicians with
Motorola training available to the City compared to one technician
at Smith Two Way. Smith Two Way can perform warranty work but must
sustain the cost of the repairs and order any parts. The Selection
Committee selected Motorola as they have the best trained
technicians available to work on the City's system which cost over
$900,000. Motorola offers field technicians free of charge to the
City, and she reported a time last year when the City used this
service. The technician worked on the City's system along with
Staff for over 12 hours. This same type of service normally costs
$750/day. Stocker reported that Motorola's original bid was
$3,800; however, the Committee voted unanimously for Motorola and
subsequently negotiated the price of $3,400. Another concern of
the Selection Committee was that in the event the City signed a
contract with Smith Two Way, and later were dissatisfied with the
service and wished to go back with Motorola, it could potentially
be costly to bring the system back up to Motorola's standards.
In response to Mayor Vorsanger's question, Ms. Stocker reiterated
that it is her understanding that Smith Two Way is not an
authorized Motorola dealer. Therefore, Mayor Vorsanger stated that
if the City allowed a nonauthorized technician to work -on their
equipment, the warranty with Motorola could be void.
Andrew Montgomery, representative from Motorola, addressed the
Board explaining that Motorola, Inc., has over 900 service centers
set up throughout the United States. Allcom Communications is the
log
April 7, 1992
only authorized Motorola service center in Northwest Arkansas and
are entitled to subcontract for Motorola and perform authorized
warranty repair for products that they sell along with the direct
sales force. The use of any other nonauthorized service center may
present warranty problems. Montgomery reported that Smith Two Way
was formerly the authorized Motorola repair center in this area;
but that contract was terminated.
Blackston, seconded by Green, made a motion to approve the
resolution. The resolution passed by a vote of 7-0.
RESOLUTION 53-92 AS RECORDED IN TEE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
ITEM "I"
Director Coody questioned whether there was a way for the City to
assist the University and work with Bernie Madison to "sweeten the
pot" for placement of the Math and Science School in Fayetteville.
Coody reported that there are several cities with a lot of
determination vying for the school as it would be a real asset to
a community.
City Manager Linebaugh reported that the City has been involved
with Bernie Madison and the University helping in every way
requested; however, he will contact them again with regard to the
matter.
Director Coody suggested that there may be some things the City
could do that haven't been thought of yet.
Henry, seconded by Blackston, made a motion to ratify the
Resolution. Upon roll call, the motion passed by a vote of 7-0.
RESOLUTION 35-92 AS RECORDED IN TEE CITY CLERIC'S OPPICE
ITEM "L"
Director Nash stated that a portion of the fees are from December
1991, and stated her concern that the bill was not timely. In
addition,. Nash asked City Attorney Rose to verify the trial date
set for the incinerator lawsuit and when this date was set.
City Attorney Rose responded that the judge set the trial for June
22, 1992, early in March during a hearing between all parties.
Director Coody further expressed his concern that these attorney
bills continue to be submitted four months late, and the City
continues to pay them without any type of recrimination.
City Attorney Rose responded that he has requested many times that
these law firms submit their statements in a timely manner; he
doesn't see what else can be done.
Blackstone
resolution.
to 2, with
April 7, 1992?'
seconded by Green, made a motion to approve the
Upon roll call, the resolution passed by a vote of 5
Directors Coody and Nash voting no.
RESOLUTION 54-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFBICS
ELDERLY TAXI SERVICE
i -0
Mayor Vorsanger introduced a report on the 1991 Elderly Taxi
Program presented •by, Elaine Walker of the Northwest Arkansas
Regional Planning Commission.
Elaine Walker, Director of the Elderly Taxi Program, addressed the
Board reporting that this program has been very positive with 1991
ridership up 5% over ;1990. She explained the reason for this small
increase was partially due to the great service being provided free
of charge by the University of Arkansas, through Razorback Transit,
with 35% of their riders non -students;-. many elderly and some
wheelchair riders.Ms.. Walker stated that Razorback Transit
reports that their ridership has doubled since last year on the
mall route with 150 to 200 riders per day. Wheelchair Transit,
Inc., a newly formed business, reports that the majority of their
rides are to grocery stores and doctors' offices In addition,
Wheelchair Transit handles backup trips'for the Rehab Hospital and
Ozark Transit; however they currently only haul 7 to 13 riders per
week. Ms. Walker, --explained that the jury is still out on
Wheelchair Transit, as a young business .that hasn't done much
advertising or marketing. Ozark Transit has started a human
service, elderly, and -handicapped system in the urbanized area,
using Federal Transit Administration ."Section 9" funds. Ms. Walker
further reported that the Elderly Taxi"Program currently has 275
participants with an,average participant age of 84.4, and the
oldest rider is 101.years old. The average participant income is
$6,417. The report further shows 41% of the trips for shopping
purposes, 30% for medical purposes, 6% to beauty shops, and many
trips for personal visitation purposes. Ms. Walker further
reported that it has been shown that the participants shop
primarily on weekdays in the middle of the day where they can take
advantage =of multipurpose shopping at close proximity to their
homes, and they tend to stay home during extreme weather
conditions. There were 6,282 coupons used in 1991, or an average
of 523 per month at a 75% savings, with an average trip cost of
$2.67. Ms. Walker explained that a survey was sent to all
participants -of the Elderly Taxi Program in October and November
1991 of which 45% responded; with only 6% of the respondents
unhappy with the program. The major complaint was being picked up
in a reasonable amount of time. The new cab service may solve some
of this problem. Ms. Walker reported receiving many positive
comments on the Elderly Taxi Program.
Director Henry inquired as to the procedure for anyone interested
in participating in the program. Ms. -Walker responded that they
190
April 7, 1992
should contact Jan Simco with the Community Development Office for
an application.
Director Nash reported on comments regarding the federally opposed
cap on income of participants ($16,000 in Fayetteville) and
questioned why Fayetteville's cap is higher than Springdale's.
Ms. Walker responded that Fayetteville uses CDBG funds with
criteria mandated by HUD; and Springdale uses general funds.
Mayor Vorsanger commended Ms. Walker for her work with the Elderly
Taxi Program
WATER SERVICE REQUEST
Mayor Vorsanger introduced a resolution approving a request for
rater service by John McDonnell for 17.3 acres on Highway 45 East.
Mayor Vorsanger introduced John McDonnell, U of A Track Coach,
commending him as one of the most successful University track
coaches in America.
City Manager Linebaugh explained that the property is located about
one-half mile east of the present growth boundary and is adjacent
to the Goshen city limits on the east side. Mr. McDonnell plans to
divide the 17.3 areas into 4 tracts. The Renager development is
directly south of the McDonnell property and has had city water
since 1977. There are no technical reasons why the City could not
serve the property with water. The water line would need to be
extended along Hwy. 45 or come from the development south of Mr.
McDonnell's at his expense. Mr. McDonnell will be forwarding an
annexation certificate and a waiver from the White River Rural
Water Authority to the City. Staff intends to look at the cost
effectiveness of enlarging this line at the time the water line is
approved, and Staff recommends approving this request.
Director Henry asked for verification that all policy questions
have been resolved and conditions met from the 1988 request for
water service to the area.
City Manager Linebaugh reported that there is a possibility that
Goshen may extend their city limits and annex the area. At that
time, an arrangement would need to be worked out with these lines.
However, this type of arrangement has been worked out before with
other surrounding towns.
John McDonnell addressed the Board explaining that he desires to
build a home on the property and is requesting four water hookups,
with plans to sell the other three parcels.
9
April 7, 1992
Director Green stated that there doesn't appear to be a downside as
far as the City is concerned, especially if studies indicate that
it would be advantageous to up-size the water line.
Green, seconded by Blackston, made a motion to approve the
resolution._ Upon roll call, the resolution passed by a vote of 7
to O.
RESOLUTION 55-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
BUILDERS' REGISTRATION.REOUIREMENT
Mayor Vorsanger introduced an ordinance requiring -state
registration for all -builders (1-4 rdwelling units) wishing to
obtain building permits within the City:
A public hearing was:held on March 24; 1992 on this registration
requirement.f
sy
*
City Manager Linebaugh reported that there were 21 members from the
public present at the public;hearing'with 8 additional comments
received before the„ Marche 31st deadline. He reported limited
discussion on public liability or,property damage insurance. The
majority of the discussionsand disagreement centered around
Workers' Compensation insurance and whether this should be required
by the City. The Home Builders Association is attempting to form
a pool under which the builders:may become self-insured. Linebaugh
reported that Staff recommends supporting the acquisition of
insurance by all persons engaged in home=building; however, Staff
is hesitant to require registration.: Therefore, Staff recommends
that a resolution be passed -in' support of the Arkansas Home
Builders Association becoming a self-insured pool.
Alett Little, Director of Planning, !reported another issue
discussed at the pubiic hearing was 'the handling of Workers'
Compensation by general contractors with relation to their
subcontractors. The State Insurance Department verified that as
per a 1981 law, 'a : contractor was '.made liable for their
subcontractors. In the event subcontractors do not have this
insurance., the general method of acquiring Workers' Compensation
insurance is for the general contractor to buy the coverage for
them. Workers' Compensation insurance is required by state law for
any person having two or more employees.
In response to Mayor Vorsanger, Director Green reported from the
agenda session that they are currently looking at passing a
resolution to support the Arkansas Home Builders Association in
developing a pool for self-insurance, instead of an ordinance
actually requiring builders to be state registered and carry all
required insurance. If this plan were to work out, the City would
avoid creating an overlying ordinance on top of existing state
requirements. Green .stated his support for passing such a
192
April 7, 1992
resolution as it may work out the current problems for all
concerned.
Green, seconded by Coody, made a motion to pass the resolution
supporting the Arkansas Home Builders Association insurance pool.
Bill Whitfield, builder from Fayetteville, addressed the Board
with a list of cities in Arkansas who have passed similar
ordinances in support of a self-insurance program Whitfield
reported that due to the high cost, a majority of builders do not
carry Workers' Compensation insurance on their employees as per
state law; a builder basically builds using subcontractors. He
referred to the recent excavation ordinance passed by the Board
with the basic purpose to protect people. In addition, Whitfield
stated that due to Arkansas' outdated laws, most people he builds
for are totally unaware of their ultimate liability and the
importance for the builders of their homes to have Workers'
Compensation insurance. Whitfield reported knowing of only ten
builders in Fayetteville who carry Workers' Compensation insurance.
Rogers, who recently passed this ordinance, has registered 70
builders who have purchased Workers' Compensation policies.
Whitfield addressed Director Coody reporting that the way the
Workers' Compensation law is currently written, it does not refer
to "remodeling".
Director Coody stated that he hires only sub -contractors with
Workers' Compensation insurance. Coody reported that his insurance
carrier reports that Workers' Compensation insurance rates have
quadrupled in the last ten years and are expected to quadruple
again in the next five years. Coody stated his support for the
resolution to encourage a home builders self-insurance pool as a
good alternative where builders could be insured at a lower, more
stable rate.
Mr. Whitfield stated that in Little Rock where an ordinance such as
this is in place, builders report that they use only subcontractors
who have their own Workers' Compensation insurance. He further
stated that there are only two alternatives - either license
everybody who builds on your house and require insurance or put the
responsibility on the builder which would be the easiest way for
the City to administer. The ordinance cannot be based on waiting
on the Arkansas Home Builders Association self-insurance program
because it needs to be done anyway. Custom home builders have no
idea what their exposure is until they are faced with it, and some
of them will not voluntarily carry this insurance.
Director Henry stated that due to the wage structure, individuals
working for these contractors do not have there own insurance and
are dependent upon them to have insurance.
Whitfield stated that in the event that the Arkansas Home Builders
Association is able to put together a workers' compensation self-
C19
April 7, 1992
insurance program similar to Tennessee and Mississippi, the local
association will have a part in the decision making process on the
program. The program would place incentives in the program to
keep rates down for those builders who don't have claims. Those
builders that have a lot of claims would pay higher rates.
Gary Streigler, C&S Custom Homes, addressed the Board relating an
incident which would have forced he and his partner out of business
had they not had Workers' Compensation insurance. There are many
abuses of the system, and it is necessary to get everybody into the
system in order to have control over it.
4.
Mark Marquess, BMP Development, addressed the Board in support of
the ordinance. He stated that regardless of the reasons given for
not carrying Workers' Compensation insurance which include the high
cost and inability to compete, an ordinance is necessary to protect
the homeowner, community, and workers, including the small home
builder. A first time homeowner has enough trouble understanding
all the legal terms required for financing let alone realizing the-
importance of insurance 'coverage. Marquess questioned the
advisability of putting..off.the ordinance to give the Arkansas Home
Builders Association time to develop a self-insurance pool.
Pat Tobin, a resident and •developer, addressed the Board stating
that before the Board 'addresses this problem, they should look at
this special interest legislation. If th'e state thought the self-
insurance program was viable, then they should have adopted it.
Restraint of the free enterprise system'will definitely take place
if this ordinance is passed. It will'eliminate the small builder,
and create a monopoly' for a certain group of people thereby
increasing the cost of housing,in.generai. Tobin stated that the
City Board and builders should be looking'at how to reduce the cost
of housing.
Ray Ragsdale, a small volume builder,addressed the Board stating
that it is unfair for all subcontractors not to have Workers'
Compensation insurance: Ragsdale reported that Fayetteville is the
largest municipality. in -Arkansas that does not have this ordinance.
There are a lot of "_fly-by-night" contractors from other states
that come -into town with no insurance and do "shoddy" work.
Director Coody asked Alett Little if the Arkansas Home Builders
Association has advised when the self-insurance pool is expected.
Little responded that a member service survey has been completed
with 20-25% of their members responding. A tabulated report will
be sent to the actuaries by April 15, and the actuarial company
will rate the reports within 30 days. The considerations of the
ratings would be the number of insured, the premiums currently
being paid, the histories of loss ratios in numbers and dollars
paid balanced against a modification factor (State rate based on
the actual experience). The ARBA expects to hear back from the
April 7, 1992
actuarial company by mid May with any obstacles this program faces;
however, there is no guarantee at this time whether they will be
able to become a self-insured pool.
Bill Whitfield addressed the Board at the request of Bruce
Blackhaw, the Executive Director of Arkansas Home Builders
Association, stating that Blackhaw has requested that the self-
insurance pool II4t be a consideration in adopting this ordinance.
He further stated that it has been brought about as a delay tactic
by builders in opposition to the ordinance. Whitfield further
stated that if the self-insurance pool program fails, the AHBA will
commence working on another program.
Director Henry asked Bill Whitfield for verification that in order
for builders to be eligible for this self-insured program, they
would need to be members of the Home Builders Association. She
also ventured that those builders opposed to this ordinance are not
members nor interested in becoming members of the ARBA.
Mr. Whitfield confirmed Director Henry's statements.
Director Coody responded that if the AHBA does become self-insured,
then the Board could look at this ordinance again and immediately
require Workers' Compensation insurance permits. This would give
builders an alternative to the standard insurance companies.
Director Henry stated that Workers' Compensation is already
required by the state except for very small subcontractors with
less than 2 employees. The problem is there is not a check point,
and the state has no registration system. Henry stated that she
supports the ordinance and registration as it allows the City to
get a better handle on the very thing they have been concerned
about - establishing track records of who is building and making
sure that permits are issued.
Director Nash concurred with Director Henry, stating that since the
issue on the agenda to be addressed is the ordinance, she suggested
that the ordinance be read and those opposed vote against it,
rather than adopt a resolution that is not a law but only
encouragement. Nash further stated that she doesn't see this as
the state dumping enforcement on the City. This is protection for
all homeowners who live in Fayetteville and not for special
interest groups. In addition, Nash stated that the Board members
took an oath to uphold the state constitution and statutes, and the
state has a statute they are asking the City to enforce.
Mayor Vorsanger asked whether this applied to the building of
office buildings as well as residential homes. Mr. Whitfield
responded that this law does not include office buildings, but
applies only to residential dwellings, single family, and multi-
family homes.
19
April 7,, 1992
Alett Little stated that persons constructing office buildings are
probably covered under the State Contractors Licensing Board and
was considered by the Home Builders Registration Act specifically
to include those other than single family builders. The State
Contractors Licensing Board just passed legislation at the last
session which applies to all other contractors.
Director Green stated that he believes this issue is more complex
than it appears on the surface. One issue is that it is putting
the City Board in the position of legislating insurance.
Director Henry responded that the legislature is putting the City
Board in the position:•of enforcing.insurance regulation that is
already in place. T;
Director Green stated that he is all'for protecting the homeowner,
contractor and workers;`involved. He suggested the City encourage
public (homeowner) education and make people aware of the risk of
not requiring certificates of insurance: In addition, the added
administrative costs to City Staff to administer this program
should be considered. - ,;hj
' S fzH'-
Alett Little responded that she has not compiled figures on -the
added administrative costs; butit will involve additional time to
make the check. Ms: Little reported'that the Inspection Division
has discussed this matter,•and the "confrontational" aspects as far
as enforcement will he handled'at the permit window.
Director Green further stated, his concern that the way the
ordinance is set up, it creates a requirement for a state
registration fee of,$25, and the Cityris'actually administering the.
program. Green stated he is in favor_of creating a program to
protect the public against the uninsured contractor; however, he is
not convinced at this time.that'this ordinance is the best way to
accomplish it. Therefore,"he stated his -support for the resolution
supporting the Home'Builders Association pool in order to give the
City more time to assess the administration cost, how the program
will be administered and enforced as'well as further assessment of
the proposed ordinance. t
_ r
Director Nash reiterated that rather.:than going through with the
resolution, it would accomplish the same thing in giving them
additional time, if they simply leave the ordinance on its first
reading. ..
Director Spivey stated that he would like further clarification on
the potential liability for the City in the instance of a builder's
insurance being canceled, the City receiving notification of this
cancellation, but for whatever reason, the license was granted
anyway.
yvv
April 7, 1992
City Attorney Rose responded that in such an instance of tort
negligence, the City would raise the defense of tort immunity.
Mayor Vorsanger asked for a vote on the resolution to support the
Arkansas Home Builders Association self-insurance pool.
Upon roll call, the resolution passed by a vote of 6 to 0 to 1,
with Director Green abstaining.
RESOLUTION 56-92 AS RECORDED IN TEE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance was read for the first time
and left on its first reading.
BID WAIVER/TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT
Mayor Vorsanger introduced an ordinance waiving the requirements of
competitive bidding for the purchase and maintenance of traffic
signal equipment.
Staff recommends waiving the requirements of competitive bidding
which would allow the Traffic Department to continue purchasing
equipment from Tranyst Traffic Control Equipment and Valmont
Traffic Signal Poles. Equipment has been purchased from these two
companies since 1980. In order to stock parts and maintain current
equipment, it is necessary to continue current purchases with the
same manufacturer. The equipment has proven to be both reliable
and economical.
The ordinance was read for the first time. Blackston, seconded by
Henry, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance
on its second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed by a vote
of 7 to 0. The ordinance was read for the second time. Blackston,
seconded by Green, made a motion to further suspend the rules and
place the ordinance on its third and final reading. Upon roll
call, the motion passed by a vote of 7 to 0. The ordinance was
read for the third and final time.
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed by a vote of 7 to 0.
ORDINANCE 3606 APPEARS ON PAGE 429 OF ORDINANCE BOOK X X VI
AMERICAN AIR FILTER
Mayor Vorsangsr introduced a resolution authorising the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute a Mortgage Agreement with American Air Filter
and Snyder General Corporation.
City Attorney Rose explained this request is based on the Arkansas
Industrial Revenue Bonds, normally referred to as Act 9 Bonds, and
it does not appear that the requested mortgage adds any new
potential liability to the City for the bond issue. The City is
1
April 7, 1992
being asked to sign a Mortgage Agreement at the request of Snyder
General Corporation. Rose explained that in 1978, the City of
Fayetteville issued Act 9 bonds in the amount $4,000,000 to
American Air Filter for construction of the American Air Filter
Plant at 2355 Armstrong Road. He further explained that Act 9
bonds essentially use the City as a -conduit to allow industrial
development in the City, allows the issuance of bonds without the
City being liable in their general fund should those bonds fail,
and essentially is a maneuver in which the IRS allows bond holders
to get the City benefit of a non -taxability status for their bonds
without putting the City's credit on the line for those bonds.
Rose reported that in 1988, this project came back before the
Board. American Air Filter, at that time a division of Allis
Chalmers & Co., who took bankruptcy, and Snyder Corporation bought
American Air Filter and took a mortgage on the property. Rose
introduced Bruce Harland from Snyder General Corporation, who wants
to request the Board agree to a new mortgage in order to take
advantage of the low interest rates currently available.
Bruce Harland, representative from the General Counsel's Office of
Snyder General Corporation based in Dallas, addressed the Board
explaining that a second and: inferior. mortgage to the City's was
put on this property.in'.1988 when purchased by Snyder General from
American Air Filter.- Harland stated that they are simply asking
the City to maintain the status quo; it will not alter the City's
rights and obligations. In order for'Snyder General Corporation to
refinance at a lower:interest rate, their lender Citicorp, requires
that all first lien holders, in this case the City of Fayetteville
acknowledges that there is a refinancing happening, and they have
no objection. € ,
City Attorney Rose further'explained that it is normal procedure in
these transactions for the City to give to the trustee of the bond
issue, all of its rights under the bond. The trustee of this bond
issue is Boatman's National Bank �f St..Louis assigned to the City
in 1978 and 1988. They have been -requested to sign the same
document the -City is being asked to:sign. Rose reported that
Boatman's National Bank advised him that they are requiring bond
holder approval before signing the Mortgage Agreement. Therefore,
Rose recommended that the Board sign the Mortgage Agreement, but
onlyafter it has been signed by Boatman's National Bank of St.
Louis as trustee. The.resolution before the Board sets out that it
is expressly_contingent upon prior execution of the agreement by
Boatman's National Bank.
Green, seconded by Blackston, made a motion to adopt the
resolution.
Director Coody inquired as to the principal amount left on the
bonds. Mr. Harland responded that at last check, it was
approximately $800,000. The original bond issue in 1978 was
1.98
April 7, 1992
$4,000,000. Harland further stated that this is a thirty year bond
and due to retire in the year 2008.
In response to Director Coody's question; Mr. Harland responded
that the interest rate was 13 3/4% and will be reduced to under 12%
although the rate has a floating feature.
Jim Crider, Director of Economic Development with the Chamber of
Commerce, addressed the Board encouraging them to consent to the
refinancing. American Air Filter has been a long standing valued
corporate citizen in Fayetteville since 1978. He explained that
this will help American Air Filter remain competitive in the world
market place.
Director Spivey concurred with Jim Crider agreeing that American
Air Filter has been a good corporate citizen and commended Bob
Hughes, the plant manager. Spivey reported having the opportunity
to tour their plant and stated that it is one of the finest plants
in Northwest Arkansas.
Upon roll call, the resolution passed by a vote of 7 to 0.
RESOLUTION 57-92 A8 RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
DALTON ARTS CENTER
Mayor Vorsanger introduced a resolution approving a change order
with McClinton -Anchor in the amount of 5150,300.00 for the
construction of the Town Creek Garden at the West Avenue parking
lot, and approval of a budget adjustment.
This change order will cover the reconstruction on the stone
structures, landscaping, a water feature, sidewalks, lighting, and
terraced walkway, and a pavilion with a skylight across from the
Walton Arts Center canopy. There are $110,000 in uncommitted funds
for this project, but a budget adjustment of $50,000, which will
include a $10,000 contingency, is required to cover the cost of the
Town Creek Garden project.
David Cox, the City's project coordinator, presented drawings of
the landscaping of Town Creek Garden at the West Avenue parking lot
including reconstruction of the stone arch with a water flowing
feature, landscaping with replacement and replanting of trees, a
pavilion matching the canopy of the Arts Center with a skylight.
Every effort is being made to complete this work before the Art
Center opens.
Director Nash asked if a public hearing has been held on the
addition of these landscaping features. Cox responded the last
public hearing was in the summer of '91 regarding approval of the
overall plan. Cox further explained that this landscaping plan was
1
April. 7, 1992
developed from the overall plan and contained the same amount of
landscaped area.
Director Nash expressed her concern that the trees and stonework
were removed and now the City is spending extra money to
reconstruct it and suggested the money may be better spent on an
existing park area rather than "reinvent the wheel".
Director Green asked what it would take in order to get the cost
back down to the original estimate of $110,000 and what features
would need to be taken out.
Cox responded that there have been several options explored. The
total removal of the pavilion would save $48,000, and $20,000 would
be saved by eliminating the skylight. Cox further reported that
the original estimate for this landscaping was $170,000.
Modifications were made to reduce the change order to $150,000.
Any further reductions would necessitate scraping the design and
starting over.
Director Green stated that the particular design being presented
was a result of many compromises in dealing with a lot of public
-input. Scraping the plans and paving this area for a parking lot
would be a dangerous course after the City Board committed to the
compromise as presented. The Walton Arts Center will be a very
pleasant facility for citizens to enjoy with green space, the water
feature and a pavilion. These positive features are the major
amenities left for this parking area. Perhaps there is a way to
reduce the cost by negotiation without changing the concept and
destroying what has been created and at the same time avoid being
accused of overdoing the landscaping.
Director Nash agreed that the landscaping plan is beautiful;
however, she expressed her concern that they need $150,000 worth of
"beautiful" when the majority of complaints against the plans were
to save the existing trees. Nash therefore suggested that they may
want to make this the maximum on this landscaping.
. 1
David Cox responded that this change order for a budget adjustment
would completely cover the cost for the garden, including changes
in the amount of $4,300_ to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act. There are two other parking lots to be
considered which will require some minor change orders to comply
with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Some of the costs are
unit costs, and it is anticipated that the full price will not be
needed for the 400 block of Dickson parking lot and there may be a
credit coming back on that..The $50,000:budget adjustment is being
requested to ensure that $10,000, remains in contingency funds to
make additional handrail modifications to comply with the Act.
4
Director Coody stated that.he.,also sees irony in this project since
hundreds of people representing thousands asked the Board to
- 44
•
4UU
April 7, 1992
preserve one-third of an acre for a park which was denied due to
lack of money and the ability to maintain. The City had the money
to tear out the stone wall, cover up the creek, remove the trees,
fill it in and pave it over. Now they have the money to recreate
the stream, rebuild the stone wall, and replant trees. Coody,
therefore, stated that the vote the Board took to bulldoze this
area was the biggest public relations snafu the City has done for
quite awhile. The best thing the City could have done was to spend
half the money and fix up the existing area.
Director Coody asked why the spring that was to be left exposed
under Scheme "B" has been covered up. Cox responded this was part
of the contract for the West Avenue parking lot. Cox further
reported that minor modifications were made to the schematic plan.
The "L" shaped landscaping plan in Scheme "B" was modified in order
to construct more parking places and contain the spring using a
spring box into an overall landscaped area. These changes were
contained on the drawings presented Board approved the plan for the
West Avenue parking lot.
Director Coody further questioned the use of "SB2" on the parking
lot when it was agreed that asphalt would be put directly on the
clay base. Cox responded that Director Coody is referring to the
change order on the Dickson Street lot rather than this lot.
Director Spivey reminded Director Coody that the vote the Board
took to bulldoze this area was a call they had to make in order to
avoid having a hole in the ground when the Walton Arts Center
opened due to being tied up in litigation. This issue has been
addressed and agonized over at many meetings and was not a flippant
decision. A decision has been made, and they do not need to go
over it again. There has been a lot of money spent, and it will be
a very nice facility. Spivey also stated that by not choosing this
path, they could have secured more property for parking.
Mayor Vorsanger asked for verification on Director Nash's
suggestion that they could use this money for improvements at
existing parks and whether it is an "even/or" situation.
City Manager Scott Linebaugh responded that the money has been
designated by the Board to be used for only this purpose.
Director Nash responded that the Board designates and undesignates
every day. In closing, she agreed that it is time to complete this
project.
Henry, seconded by Blackston, made a motion to adopt the
resolution.
David Franks, resident of the Walton Art Center "Disapprovement"
District, addressed the Board stating that there used to be a park
at West and Dickson which was bulldozed with "misused" City funds.
' April 7, 11992
Franks stated that the City has stabbed "them" in%the back and now
is compromising by not twisting the knife so badly. He expressed
his displeasure with the proposed landscaping plan. He stated it
is not a garden, or a park, or a, spring, or the wall. Franks
reported that the row of trees on the east side, unless planting
poplar trees, the parking lot is visible from every lobby window in
the Walton Arts Center building.`. In addition, this will produce a
glare for the afternoon performances. from the parking lot and cars.
Mr. Franks further asked if someone planned to monitor that only
the elderly and infirmed park on this one-third acre.
,..„
Charles Moorman, resident of Finger Road,''addressed the Board
stating that City Manager Linebaugh was reported as lamenting the
fact that the sales tax suit had deprived the taxpayers of a number
of needed services, such as street improvements,ipark maintenance,
etc. Therefore, the Board should consider reallocating the
$150,300 for those purposes rather than spending the money to make
amends for the destruction of Town Creek Park by replacing what was
once a beautiful, natural, wooded green space with what appears to
be an unneeded, pretentious, a wholly artificial garden with its
spur of the moment addition of a glass pavilion entirely alien to
the historical character and way of life of the area, and designed
as yet another mindless feature of a self-indulgent facility.
Moorman stated that the last existing tree on the Arts Center
grounds, at the corner of Dickson and School, went down this week
in the course of constructing the Arts Center parking lot which
inartistic asphalt slabs have already cost the City $2.5 million.
Barbara Moorman, resident of Finger Road, addressed the Board
stating that for just phase II of this particular parking lot, they
are proposing to spend $800,000 which will probably be over $1
million after the purchase of land, demolition, and other phases.
The budget for Walton Arts Center parking was $2,480,037 and
$2,369,737 has already been spent, and now the City wants to exceed
the budget at $2,530,037. Moorman stated that the Arts Center,
fostered and fed by the City, is a monster as greedy as it is
tasteless and is swallowing money just as it has swallowed trees
and green space and the character of original Fayetteville. Ms.
Moorman requested that the City Board cut off the Arts Center's
allowance and to start compensating for the damage and suggested a
better idea would be to put the money toward buying the land and
trees for a park next to Leverett School which the City claims they
can't afford.
John Quinn, resident of Stagecoach Drive, addressed the Board
endorsing the proposed parking facility across from the Walton Arts
Center. He plans to attend some of the activities taking place at
the facility; and he will want close, convenient parking. Quinn
stated that theplan is a reasonable compromise that most
reasonable citizens of Fayettevillewould approve and agree to in
trying to restore green space that was taken and yet provide
efficient parking utilization for the facility.
20
L232
April 7, 1992
Mayor Vorsanger called for a vote on the resolution.
Upon roll call, the resolution passed by a vote of 6 to 1, with
Director Nash voting no.
RESOLUTION 58-92 AS RECORDED IN THE CITY CLERR'S OFFICE
OTHER BUSINESS
"3 MINUTE BEEPER"
Director Coody requested that the little "beeping device" be moved
to another location as it really has no purpose and is annoying.
City Manager Linebaugh responded that the device is Board policy
and was instituted by the Board at their wishes.
Director Blackston stated that he would rather see the "3 minute
rule" enforced rather than do away with the beeping device; it is
annoying to him when the beeper goes off and there's no action
taken.
Mayor Vorsanger stated that it is probably his fault that the rule
is not being enforced.
NEWSPAPER ARTICLE
Mayor Vorsanger stated that in the same newspaper article that Mr.
Moorman mentioned, there was a quote by Mr. Robson which mentioned
Mayor Vorsanger's name, ". . the lawsuit was filed and I didn't
even know it had been filed . ." Mayor Vorsanger reported that
for the record, he would be giving the press tonight transcripts of
the hearing and depositions sworn under oath. Mr. Robson is
mentioned by five out of six of the individuals that filed the
sales tax lawsuit against the City as the individual who they
talked to, and in most cases, were asked by Mr. Robson to be a
party to that suit.
Tiny Hamilton
discussed, he
Director, and
HAMILTON REOUEST
requested that since this issue has already been
be allowed to speak with Mayor Vorsanger, a Board of
the press after the meeting.
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
Director Nash reiterated that Jerry Cooper would be presenting a
report at the next agenda session.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:02 p.m.