HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-01-04 MinutesMINUTES OF A RETREAT OF TEE CITY BOARD 08 DIRECTORS
A Retreat Meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was
held on Friday, January 4, 1991 at 8:00 a.m. in Room 326 of the
City Administration Building at 113 West Mountain Street,
Fayetteville, Arkansas.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Vorsanger. He pointed out
that no official Board action can be taken at the retreat meeting.
COURT RULING
INIE
City Manager Scott Linebaugh reviewed the ruling by the Court
concerning the petition to change the form of city government which
was filed by Robert Reus. The Judge ruled in favor of the City on
every point that was made. The Judge commented on the efficiency
of the City in preparing its case and in trying to give every
benefit to the petitioner. Jerry Rose commented on the fact that.
the. City had an exceptional client in City Clerk Sherry Thomas. The
Board congratulated him on a job well done.
GENERAL BUDGET
Julie Nash expressed her concern over the Hot Check Program. She
felt it could be postponed for the time being. Vorsanger responded
by saying this item would be on the agenda for further discussion.
Michael Green expressed his desire to concentrate on balancing the
budget and not having a deficit. He suggested making across-the-
board reductions to help reduce the deficit. It was suggested that
the Air Museum be funded through the A&P.
Linebaugh addressed the Board concerning the salary, increase that
has been budgeted. The employees are eligible fora raise from 0
to 13 per cent. The amount of increase depends on how long an
employee has been with the City and their job performance. The
total overall budgeted salary increase is $123,000, which is the
smallest increase budgeted in years. This is an average increase
of 3.5% and will be given to the employee on his/her anniversary
date.
Linebaugh further explained that a lot of work was done in,choosing
the firm to help with the salary studies. In order to get a raise
the employee goes through a performance evaluation, and ,that is
graded as to their performance. Their raise will be based upon
where they sit on the pay matrix comparing comparable positions in
the region.
Mayor Vorsanger explained to the Board that a decision should be
made as to whether or not to keep present employees at their
present salary, hire new people, or forego some new positions to
•
16
17
help present employees.
Mr. Rose is requesting
It was pointed out that
raises for at least 10
•
January 4; 1991
Mr. Rose's office was used as an example.
an attorney to assist him with his duties.
the salary for that one attorney would make
people.
Linebaugh addressed the Board regarding the fund balance. He
stated that at the end of 1991, the City will end up with a fund
balance of $2,938,000 which is above the 10 percent margin that is
maintained. He emphasized that unless something is changed by the
end of 1993, going into 1994, there would be a deficit situation in
the budget. Further, there have been numerous cuts made. He
proposed that across the board cuts not be made because it would
drastically affect the efficiency of the entire operation. To come
up with an additional $370,000 this year is going to be difficult.
It would mean eliminating some programs and raising some revenue
such as the pool fees, lakes fees, or decrease money given to the
Youth Center, ambulance service, animal services, etc. These are
areas that really cannot afford to be reduced financially.
According to revenue sources, we are not competitive with other
cities.
Mayor Vorsanger stated that 1990 was a record year for building
permits in Fayetteville. There was $15,000,000 in new buildings.
He wanted to know if this money has been reflected in the budget
thusfar.
Linebaugh responded by saying the Budget Staff would review the
major categories of revenues and how the estimate was made. Growth
is included in that study.
Judy Cohea, Budget Coordinator, stated that when the property tax
was calculated, a final 1990 final assessed figure was not
available from the assessment office at that time. The new
building debt was completed in 1990 and the City would receive
money on it in October of 1992. This calculation was based on last
year, and there is a 90 per cent collection rate built in. The
County did a little better than 90 per cent last year as far as
collecting property tax. The 1991 figure has not changed
significantly since the figures were obtained. The sales tax has
a built-in four per cent increase. The franchise taxes have a two
per cent growth increase, except for Warner Cable, which went from
a three per cent franchise to a five per cent franchise.
OPEN CHANNEL
Mayor Vorsanger asked if all of the Warner Cable franchise was
dedicated to Open Channel. Cohea responded by saying that it was
not dedicated to Open Channel. She explained that the Board did
enter into a contract with Open Channel that will use this
increase, and the Open Channel contract is budgeted on the
expenditure side. Cohea stated that the Board is not obligated to
m January 4, 1991.04
give that five per cent to Open Channel,'but it should be. spent for
public information. The contract that the City has with Open
Channel is for $75,000 and runs from November 1, to October 31,
1991.
Mayor Vorsanger asked if there would be any increases because of
the Alcohol Beverage Tax. Cohea responded by saying that unless
there is great growth in population, and additional establishments,
the Alcohol Beverage Tax is based on sales. Franchise taxes are
figured upon population growth also.
Mayor Vorsanger asked about the low figure on the state insurance
turnback for fire and police on the intergovernmental revenue.
Cohea explained that a portion of that goes into the local pension
funds.
CHARGES AND SERVICES
The HMR administrative charge is a percentage of collections. The
county municipal court fees are what the county contributes for
half of our Judge's salary and half of our Clerk's salary provided
by state law. The boat stalls, and daily fishing permitsare all
based on previous years' revenues. Administration building•rent is
what the general fund charges other divisions that are - in this
building or funded from another source, which include building
maintenance, janitorial, utilities, etc. Cost allocation'is the
cost center for the general fund to all other funds for general
administration, finance, accounting, city attorney, etc. This is
the first year for the fire station allocation. This is an
allocation to the Airport Fund for Fire Station #3, and each year
we plan to increase this until we get to the actual cost of Fire
Station #3 being charged to the airport.
. .
•
Cohea explained that the Airport Fire Station has to be dedicated
to fight just the airport fires. Even if there is a fire across
the street,• it cannot go across the street to fight the fire.
BUILDING MAINTENANCE REVENUES
Cohea explained that this department's revenue is an accounting
function. If the Building Maintenance Staff does something for
another fund, the charge for the service is put into the general
fund revenues rather than taking it back against their expense
accounts in 1991. This is not a new practice, it's just a new way
of accounting for it.
The planning office fees are basically flat, and based on last
year's fee structures. For any parking meter on or next to the
street rather than in a parking lot the general fund receives the
revenue.
•
18
:15
January 4, 1991
The administration fee is the fee the City charges for off-street
parking. The traffic division writes all the tickets and does all
the maintenance on the parking meters and all of the parking lots.
The gross revenues from the swimming pool, gross revenues from the
pool concession and gross revenues from the park concession are all
in the budget. The tennis court fees are the revenue from the
coin-operated lights.
The prosecutor fee is a fee that is required by state law that the
prosecutor's office collects.
The Hot Check Fees are $70,000, and the Hot Check Postage Fees are
$23,000. This is the revenue that we have from the Hot Check
Program. Total revenues would have to be reduced if this program
is deleted.
The Municipal Court fees are fees charged for postage.
The Fire Contract outside the City is for any home or association
within two miles of the city limits that choose to have an outside
contract with the city. These fees go into the General Fund and
then the Fire Department is funded from the General Fund.
Cohea explained that cost allocation is where user departments are
charged for services rendered by the central service areas which is
the city manager, city attorney, finance, administrative services,
postage, overall phone lines, etc. It brings money out of an
enterprise fund, into the general fund, which supports these
functions. These figures dropped due to the cutback in Staff.
FINES AND FORFEITURES
This estimate is based on previous years' experience. There are
two new fees that are added for 1991. They include a court cost
and a warrant fee, which are planned to be implemented.
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
The transfer of excess HMR and CEC was budgeted at $300,000. This
is the excess above the debt service requirement in the Continuing
Education Center Bond Fund that is returned to the City General
Fund. At this time it is pledged to the debt service of the Arts
Center and to Advertising and Promotion.
The transfer from off-street parking is the part of the collection
of the parking fines. The other transfer would be for the
maintenance of the meters. The other categories included are:
interest categories for the general fund, bad debt revenued that
are collected through our collection agencies, etc.
•
January 4•, 1991
Mayor Vorsanger asked the Board if they had any questions about the
subjects discussed, and if they had any proposals for areas to be
cut back.
Director Nash asked about each department's travel and training
budgets. Kevin Crosson, Administrative Services Director,
responded that the City was trying to increase the capabilities of
its staff, and without training, it would be harder to achieve that
goal.
Mayor Vorsanger explained that the Board would have to have a good
justification for raising taxes if it is determined that is what is
needed. The Board does not anticipate this happening.
There was discussion about the fact that maybe more was being spent
on better equipment when a cheaper brand would work just as well.
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
Mayor Vorsanger discussed that the greater expense in this
department could be due to the inflated cost of fuel. He explained
the use of personal city cars could be an area where money could be
saved.
Coody asked how it was determined who drives a city car. Linebaugh
responded by saying that there are only a limited number of people
who are allowed to take a car home. Primarily, only people who are
on call take cars home. The Ford Taurus was chosen because of the
efficiency of this vehicle (front wheel drive, fuel efficiency,
etc.) The number of vehicles that are being driven home by
employees has been cut by 50 percent.
HOT CHECK PROGRAM
The major reason this program is being proposed now is that the hot
check problem has 'been neglected for many years. There are
constant complaints from businesses that hot checks are not being
handled. We are trying to solve that problem by implementing this
program and starting a Hot Check Division, where there are police
officers to serve the warrants, etc. The total net effect of the
program for the first year is a cost of $30,000. After that, the
program will generate revenue for the General Fund. At the same
time, it will cause the merchants to not have the problems that
they are currently having. This year there is an expense of around
$10,000 to implement the Hot Check Program in this budget. This
would, in essence, create a monopoly in the hot check collection.
Local collection agencies will have a decrease in their hot check
transactions.
Vorsanger asked if there was a need to pass an ordinance to enforce
the Hot Check Program. City Attorney Jerry Rose responded by
120
•
21
January 4, 1991
saying that approving the program in the budget would be all that
was needed to start the program Possibly the collection fee would
have to be established by ordinance.
It was pointed out that Springdale seems to have a very successful
hot check program currently in operation.
Vorsanger asked if the Board would like to vote on keeping the Hot
Check Program in the Budget. The consensus of the Board was to
leave the Hot Check Program in the Budget.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
In the past, until this past year, the Advertising & Promotion
Commission did fund $10,000-$12,000 per year in Economic
Development advertisements. When the Board got involved in doing
the same, A&P stopped their funding. There was no need for it
being done from both places. At this time there is a partnership
agreement with A&P.
Director Coody stated that he was not against Economic Development,
but he felt there were other ways to attract industry. He stated
that there are plans to budget $1.5 million over the next four
years to buy land in the south industrial park. He expressed his
desire to make Fayetteville a more visually attractive town, thus,
attracting more people to the area. He was not in support of
buying industrial park land.
Economic Development Coordinator Richard Shewmaker stated that in
regard to the new industrial park, the benefits will be recognized
in the future in the way of improvement of the tax base,
improvement of sales tax, more jobs, more revenue circulating in
the community, etc. if only the Board will proceed, and support the
industrial park development under City ownership. The industrial
park should have access to all modes of transportation, although
rail is rarely used these days, in order to make it marketable.
The industrial park is being bought by the City from a non-profit
organization.
Coody stated that there are people that think we do not need this
industrial park. Seventy five percent of the people polled said
they would like to see Fayetteville have more parks and greenspace
land, but we can't have parks and green land because we are buying
industrial park land.
Mayor Vorsanger addressed the Board regarding the operating budget
that is being proposed for economic development. The whole budget
is $7,000 more than the budget of 1990, because the Program was not
in full force in 1990. The Board was asked for a consensus of how
they felt in regard to continuing this program. It was the
1
•
•
r
a,.
January 4, 1991,
consensus of the Board to target the industrial park and cut back
on Economic Development.
Blackston voiced his opinion on the need to target industries that
could not only help the City solve one problem, by buying
industrial park land; but can solve other problems such as the
Solid Waste situation. His opinion was that the City try to
recruit people using recyclables and make their goods into a
marketable product.
It was the general consensus of the Board that the problem could
not be solved by just batting the subject of where cuts could be
made back and forth among the Board members. Crosson suggested
that his department take the figures, study them, and make a new
proposal to the Board at a later date.
REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Director Green addressed the Board concerning the regional
philosophy that has been developed. It is not known exactly what
role the Regional Planning Commission will play as this process
evolves. There are various other entities that are getting
started, and they all have their areas of expertise and weaknesses:
The whole role that they play in Fayetteville has changed
considerably since the City's planning office has been developed to
do most of the expert consulting. The main fearhe expressed, is
that since their dues are on a per capita basis, Fayetteville will
be the largest entity of their membership. It's going to take a
considerable amount of revenue out of that organization, and it
would greatly impair their ability to keep staff and data together.
They support several successful programs, but it is difficult to
put a monetary value on the programs that they support.
There was discussion about the fact that the Regional Planning
Commission thusfar has not presented to the Board a reason why they
are an effective, viable organization. The Board expressed concern
regarding justifying the city's contribution to this organization.
Mayor Vorsanger voiced. his support of the Regional Planning
Commission and the role that they play as a viable organization.
He suggested that the Board continue their support this year, and
warn the Commission that they should re-evaluate the effectiveness
of their Program and suggest they play a more active role in the
future.
Planning Management Director John Merrell commented on his concern
about the Regional Planning Commission's lack of communication and
inactive role in viable regional planning. He stated that it was
his perception that they don't really like to deal with the City
Staff.
,.22
G3
January 4, 1991
It was suggested that a vote be taken on the issue of continuing to
support the Commission in the 1991 budget. Upon roll call, it was
decided to exclude the Regional Planning Commission from the 1991
Budget by a vote of 4 to 2, with Vorsanger and Green voting in the
minority.
The next meeting of the Board will be inclusive of the Police and
Fire Departments, to be held following the Agenda session on
Wednesday, January 9, 1991.
Vorsanger commented that he had received letters from fifth graders
at Washington Elementary School pertaining to a visit made by the
Mayor. He said the consensus of the fifth graders was that they
were all pleased with the program that was presented by the
policemen. The following sentence was contained in every letter
received by Mayor Vorsanger: "Please give them (the policemen) a
raise."
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 a.m.
1