HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-12-05 MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A regular meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was
held on Tuesday, December 5, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the Directors'
Room of the City Administration Building at 113 West Mountain
Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
PRESENT: Mayor William Martin; Directors Michael Green, Russ
Kelley, Ernest Lancaster, Paul Marinoni, Jr., Shell
Spivey and Fred Vorsanger; Assistant City Manager
Scott Linebaugh, City Attorney Jerry Rose, City
Clerk Sherry Thomas; members of the staff, press,
and audience.
CALL TO ORDER
.i`L14
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor, with seven Directors. 394.1
present. The Mayor asked those present to stand and recite the
Pledge of Allegiance, and then asked that a brief moment of
respectful silence be observed.
The Mayor welcomed the public watching the meeting on television,
and those present in the audience. He said everyone present would
have an opportunity to address the Board on every item under
discussion. He asked that those wishing to speak introduce
themselves, give their place of residence, keep their comments
concise and non -repetitive, and address the entire Board. He said
any questions for the Board or staff should be directed to the
Mayor.
CONSENT AGENDA
394.2
The Mayor introduced consideration of items which may be approved 394.3
by motion, or contracts and leases which can be approved by
resolution, and which may be grouped together and approved
simultaneously under a "Consent Agenda." The Mayor explained that
the`Consent Agenda represents items on which there is thought to
be unanimous agreement by the Board, but pointed out any Director
may request the removal of an item from the Consent Agenda. The
Mayor read the items contained in the consent agenda, as follows:
A. Approval of Minutes of the November 21, 1989, regular Board 394.4
of Directors meeting;
•
B. A resolution authorizing approval
earnest money to the Library Board
the Medark Building;
•
of repayment of $50,000 in 394.5
which was,used to purchase
In December 1988, the City'Board voted to purchase the Medark
Building for a total of $360,000 with -$50,000 down for
purposes of expanding the City Library. The property sale has
been closed and the Library Board, which paid the $50,000, now
•
December 5, 1989
needs to be reimbursed. Funds were budgeted in the Sales Tax
Construction Fund to cover this expense.
RESOLUTION 120-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND
RESOLUTION BOOK
395.1 C. Approval of a budget adjustment in the Sewer Plant
Construction Department for the self-insurance account in the
amount of $96,139.00.
Due to a chlorine leak, the effluent filter computer and
contaminated sand had to be replaced. The funds will be
transferred from the contract services account where
sufficient funds remain after completing outstanding
contracts.
RESOLUTION 120A-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND
RESOLUTION BOOK
395.2 D. Approval of an agreement between the City of Fayetteville and
City Manager James L. Pennington regarding the terms of his
resignation and pending consultant status.
Kelley,
Agenda.
seconded by Vorsanger, made a motion to approve the Consent
Upon roll call, the motion passed by a vote of 7-0.
395.3 HUNTINGDON HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Mayor Martin introduced a request by Jim Treadway of the Huntingdon
Homeowners Association to discuss storm drainage runoff problems
in the Huntingdon neighborhood between Tartan Way and Kings Cross.
395.4 Jim Treadway addressed the Board representing the Huntingdon
Homeowners Association. He explained that the Huntingdon
neighborhood was a Planned Unit Development (PUD) started about 10
years ago. The developer went bankrupt and has not maintained the
streets and drainage in the development. Building permits since
that time have been issued for individual homes by the City of
Fayetteville. There is one area that has particularly serious
drainage problems, and that is between the Tartan Way cul-de-sac
to the Kings Cross cul-de-sac. Several years ago, a concrete swale
was built from the Tartan Way cul-de-sac half way toward Kings
Cross. When the water reached the end of the concrete, it
eventually made its way down to Kings Cross, ending up eventually
on Warwick Street. About a year and a half ago, construction was
begun on a house and the drainage diverted from that to Charring
Cross through a couple of yards. The water was then diverted again
in another direction. This new route then created problems for a
couple of residents on Kings Cross. Again, the water was diverted
at the request of these homeowners. A ditch was dug through
another man's property to Kings Cross. When the City dug this
1
1
1
•
December 5, 1989+
ditch, they thought they, were placing the ditch in a utility
easement. However, the property owner questions this and thinks
the ditch is not in a utility easement and raises the question
regarding the legality of running storm water through a utility
easement.
On November 2, some of the members of the Association met with Bob 396.1
Kelly, Public Works Director, to discuss the.problems and potential
solutions. The association -is hopeful that some attention and
quick action can be taken to help alleviate the drainage problems.
Mayor Martin asked Scott Linebaugh if the Staff had any responses, 396.2
recommendations, or requests in regard to the homeowner's petition.
Linebaugh stated that he would like to request two weeks for the
Staff to thoroughly research the problem and come up with
recommendations.
•
Mr. Treadway stated the Homeowners Association had no problem with
the two week time period.
Director Green requested that the Staff also make suggestion about
how to prevent this type of situation from happening again. This
type of situation has not been addressed by ordinances, i.e., who
has to foot the cost of repairs and maintenance in one of these
developments (PUD) when the developer goes bankrupt.
Director Vorsanger requested the Staff recommend where the funding
is to come from to pay for any improvement and renovations in the
neighborhood. He stated this is an age-old problem that keeps
happening within the City.. It is the developer who paved the
substandard streets, put in the sewer lines, and dealt with the
drainage situations. It is then all of the citizens in the City
that is paying for the renovations. He feels some of this cost
should be shared by the property owners. He also feels there
should be some mechanism to put money from developers in escrow,
like the Green Space program, to fund renovations under these types
of circumstances.
396.3
396.4
Director Kelley asked if_the_Staff has come up with any temporary 396.5
solutions for the runoff problems. Bob --Kelly, stated that the
problem as it exists now is a temporary solution --diverting the
drainage to an open ditch. It has eliminatedthe flooding to the
houses down below the ditch, but dumps quite a'bit of debris on the
street.
Mr. Treadway stated he felt it was good that the City study how to 396.6
handle PUD's in the future. The.homeowners are.concerned that the
City has authorized building permits seemingly at times without
regard to the drainage problems°that_the new.homes contribute to.
Eric Malstrom,
Eric.Malstrom, 3248 Charing Drive, addressed the Board He stated
much of the drainage has gone through .the -yards of the people
396.7
December 5, 1989
residing on Warwick Road. A lot of the residents have gone to
considerable expense to protect their property by building berms
to divert the water. The water has been at a depth of over 6
inches in the yards of the Warwick Road residents. He stated he
was concerned about the possibility of the homeowners having to
share the cost of correcting the drainage problems. He asked if
it would be premature to discuss with the city some of the
alternatives to alleviate the problem.
397.1 Mayor Martin stated it would be premature for the Board because
they have not yet had a recommendation from the Staff, but the
Staff will be in contact with the homeowners during this period to
have input into the alternative process.
397.2 Malstrom suggested a couple of alternatives: (1) Make more
permanent the current ditch that exists that drains the water onto
Kings Cross. This could be done above ground by using crushed rock
or underground at an increased cost. (2) Make more permanent an
existing natural drainage that goes behind his property through
the green space and winds up at the corner of Catherine and
Warwick. He stated that if we had had a wetter season, several of
the residences could have suffered structural damage. In this
regard, he asked that the problem be addressed in the shortest time
period possible.
397.3 Mayor Martin asked if he and/or his neighbors had considered the
"fix" the City found themselves in regarding the PUD planned
drainage versus the City approved and accepted drainage system.
Martin asked if the Huntingdon residents acknowledged the
differences in responsibility the City had for a normal subdivision
and a PUD.
397.4
Malstrom stated he found it hard to believe that the PUD had been
approved initially. He lives on a cul-de-sac, and there is not
enough room to turn a vehicle around if there is another vehicle
parked on the side of the road in the cul-de-sac. He understands
that the PUD has gone through several problems through its
evolvement. However, he sees as another problem the fact that the
City has issued building permits.
397.5 Mayor Martin stated that the association has asked good questions
and presented good points. He stated the City had been involved
in legal complications about issuing building permits, so he hopes
the public will also wait until there is a full report from Staff
because some of the permits may or may not have been under City
control.
397.6 Bill Pritchard, a resident of Elkins but a property owner in the
Huntingdon area, addressed the Board. He owns the lot where the
ditch has been dug to channel water. He stated the ditch the City
dug through his lot was not through the utility easement. This has
been very detrimental to the value of his property.
v..
December 5, 1989 !;
SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT
Mayor Martin introduced consideration of a resolution authorizing 398.1
the award of a bid to the lowest bidder, Fayette Tree & Trench,
Inc., and a budget adjustment for the Davidson Street Sewer
Rehabilitation Project.
The low bid for this project was $243,378.91, of which $220,000 was
budgeted requiring a budget adjustment of $23,400. This project
includes six sewer replacements: (1) Davidson Street, (2) Willow
Street, (3) Walker Park, (4) Calvin Street, (5) Halsell Street, and
(6) Center Street. The Center Street replacement is an emergency
project and will be completed as soon as possible. The remainder
of the projects will be carried forward and constructed in 1990.
Director Marinoni, seconded by Kelley, made a motion to approve the
resolution. Upon roll call, the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION 121-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND
RESOLUTION BOOK
CITY MANAGER SELECTION PROCESS
398.2
398.3
Mayor Martin introduced consideration of the selection process for 398.4
selecting a new city manager for the City of Fayetteville.
Director Vorsanger stated he felt the advertisement announcing the 398.5
vacancy should be placed in both local and state newspapers. He
commended the suggestion that the Personnel Director be the
individual where applications and resumes are sent. He would like
to make some editorial changes in the ad and will get with City
Staff on these.
Director Vorsanger stated he would like to discuss with the Board 398.6
and public the importance of the'selection process. The Board's
responsibility is tohire_ra-professio an lly'trelned;.pers and the
selection-of-rthe city manager is the Board's decision t make. ''
ar—s he -search process is essential,. and he would.like to suggest that
the:Board-take=t7ieTneteSSa'ry=t me:4toreview^the_city's mission
and purpose, (2) conduct their own. audit of the city's major
strengths and needs.; (3) establish. priorities, -for the next period
of executive leadership;: (4) articulate particular skills and style
that the Board is seeking in thet new city. manager; and (5)
establish clear objectives and/expectations far'the first year�of _
service.by the new city manager. He feels the city manager form
of government is on trial and' at risk -in this community, and he
feels selecting a new city manager is "one of. the most important,
tasks the Board will ever have before it.
,
December 5, 1989
399.1 Mayor Martin stated that the proposed selection process would
incorporate some of the suggestions Director Vorsanger made
regarding the whole Board acting as the search committee and be a
committee of the whole.
Director Lancaster, seconded by Kelley, made a motion to adopt the
selection process.
399.2 Robert Royce addressed the Board and informed them that he would
be circulating a petition calling for an election to reorganize
the form of government of the City.
399.3 Mayor Martin stated that Mr. Royce was entitled to his position.
Every petition to change the form of government since the city
manager form has been adopted has been defeated by the voters.
Upon roll call, the motion to approve the selection process passed
by a vote of 7-0.
OTHER BUSINESS
ADVERTISING AND PROMOTION COMMISSION
399,4 Director Green stated that the Advertising and Promotion Commission
met Monday and is in the process of establishing a new proposed
budget that should be brought to the Board in the next couple of
months.
RESOURCE RECOVERY AUTHORITY
399.5 Assistant City Manager Linebaugh stated that on the advice of the
attorneys on the incinerator lawsuit, the Board needs to reactivate
the Resource Recovery Authority and reappoint the 4 City Board
members who served on the Authority in the past. The basic reason
for this is because of the terms of the members. There will need
to be an Authority meeting sometime this week, tentatively
scheduled for Friday at 2:00 p.m. to disuusz the "tolling
agreements." He stated there was not other business the Authority
gould deal with other than t*o +^
.... "'ng ay�ecmen�a.
399.6 City Attorney Rose stated that the "tolling agreements" are
agreements between the City and any individual the City might want
to bring suit against at some point in time after the time for
filing a suit has legally expired. Attorneys agree that the time
limit for the City will be on or about December 15, 1989, so they
find it very important to receive these tolling agreements.
1
December 5, 19894
Director Vorsanger, seconded by Kelley,
Directors Kelley, Lancaster, Marinoni,
Recovery Authority. Upon roll call, the
RESOLUTION, 121A-89 APPEARS ON PAGE
RESOLUTION'BOOK
made a motion to reappoint
and Martin to the Resource
motion passed unanimously.
OF ORDINANCE AND
z
402.1
•
PUBLIC HEARING -CENTRAL FAYETTEVILLE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP
Mayor Martin stated a public hearing would be held on Wednesday, 402.2
December 6 from 7:00-10:00 p.m. concerning the Central Fayetteville' '
Development Plan Workshop from' Dickson Street to the• Square
Corridor. He stated this hearing is very important and encouraged
anyone that has input about the development of the Dickson Street`
area to attend the meeting and make their views known.
BEAVER LAKE WATER QUALITY PROJECT
Mayor Martin stated he had received a letter from the Department 402.3
of the Army stating that the Beaver Lake Water Quality Project was
recently funded by Congress and development and implementation of
plans to improve water quality will get underway in 1990; The
Corps of Engineers will hold an informal briefing for civic leaders
and elected officials from the lake area at -10:00 a.m.on
Wednesday, December 13 at the Beaver Resident Office in Rogers.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
•
•
•