HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-09-05 Minutes>.85.1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A regular meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was held on
Tuesday, September 5, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. in the Directors' Room of the City
Administration Building at 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
PRESENT: Mayor William Martin; Directors Michael Green, Russ Kelley,
Ernest Lancaster, Paul Marinoni, Jr., Shell Spivey and Fred
Vorsanger; City Manager James Pennington, City Prosecutor Terry
Jones, City Clerk Suzanne McWethy; members of the staff, press
and audience
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Mayor, with seven Directors present. The
Mayor welcomed the new City Attorney, Jerry Rose, asked those present to stand
and recite the Pledge of Allegiance, and then asked that a brief moment of
respectful silence be observed.
285.2 The Mayor welcomed the public watching the meeting on television, and those
present in the audience. He said everyone present would have an opportunity to
address the Board on every item under discussion. He asked that those wishing
to speak introduce themselves, give their place of residence, keep their comments
concise and non -repetitive, and address the entire Board. He said any questions
for the Board or staff should be directed to the Mayor.
FULBRIGHT HONORED
285.3 Dan Ferritor, University of Arkansas Chancellor, said on September 22 J. William
Fulbright, for many years the junior senator from Arkansas, would be returning
to his home in Fayetteville, and during that time a number of people at the
University and in the city have dedicated three days to "Welcome Home Bill" time.
Ferritor told the Board that fifty years ago this month Senator Fulbright became
President Fulbright of the University of Arkansas and served in that post for
two years before moving on to Congress and the Senate.
285.4 Ferritor said, in order to show Fulbright how much the community appreciates him,
he was requesting the Board set aside a space on the west side of the Old Post
Office on the Square right outside the building, to place a plaque commemorating
Senator Fulbright and his many long years of homecomings to Fayetteville and his
long years of service to the United States and to the world.
285.5 Ferritor said John Lewis, President of Bank of Fayetteville, wrote a letter to
the City Board expressing his regret that he was unable to attend the meeting,
but expressing his support of the request. Ferritor read Lewis' letter to the
Board.
1
•
•September 5, 1989
It was moved by Martin and seconded'by Vorsanger to approve the request. 286.1
Bill Giese, Fayetteville resident, said he wanted to make sure it was included 286.2
that, it was through Fulbright's leadership that the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
was pushed through.
George Blackwell, Fayetteville resident, said Fulbright was the compelling force 286.3
in the acquisition of the Veterans' Hospital in Fayetteville, and has spent a
lot of his lifetime for the benefit'of'the veterans and their families.
Upon roll call, the motion.passed, 7-0:
RESOLUTION 76-89 APPEARS ON PAGE 1 s OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
CONSENT AGENDA
•
The Mayor introduced consideration of items which may be approved by motion, or
contracts and leases which can be approved by resolution, and which may be
grouped together and approved simultaneously under a "Consent Agenda." The Mayor
explained that the Consent Agenda represents items on which there is thought to
be unanimous agreement by the Board, but pointed out any Director may request
the removal of an item from the Consent Agenda. The Mayor read the items
contained in the consent agenda, as follows:
Minutes of the August 15, 1989 regular Board meeting and the August
9; 1989 special Board meeting;
286.4
286.5
286.6
B. Consideration of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk 286.7
to execute a one-year agreement with Continental Ozark, Inc., for
lease of the north one-half of the executive aircraft hangar at the
Fayetteville Municipal Airport;
The City Manager recommends approval of the lease. The term
of the lease is to be from September 1, 1989 through August
31, 1990, with three options to renew, at a monthly rate of
$653.48. This is an increase of $33.48 per month over the rate
charged in 1986, 1987 and 1988.
RESOLUTION 77-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
C. Consideration of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk 286.8
to execute a one-year agreement with the University of Arkansas for
the south one-half of the executive hangar at the Fayetteville
Municipal Airport;
September 5, 1989
37.1 The City Manager recommends approval of the lease. The term
of the lease is to be from July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990,
at a monthly rate of $653.48. This is an increase of $33.48
per month over the rate charged in 1987 and 1988.
RESOLUTION 78-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
87.2 D. Consideration of the award of Bid #89-35, for the purchase of a
water main drilling machine; and a request for approval of a budget
adjustment;
87.3
287.4
287.5
The City Manager recommends award to the second lowest bidder,
Municipal Pipe and Supply of Ft. Smith, whose bid was within
5% of the lowest bidder, an out of state vendor. Arkansas law
gives Arkansas vendors preference over low out-of-state bids
when their bid is within 5% of the lowest bidder.
BID AMOUNT: $15,602.45
BUDGET: $11,500
The City Manager recommends approval of a budget adjustment
of $4,103, to be taken from funds budgeted for chemicals which
will not be used.
E. A request for approval of a budget adjustment to cover the cost of
repairs to the City -owned ROA Head Start facility located at 2052
S. Garland;
The Head Start Program, operated under the direction of the
Economic Opportunity Agency, is currently housed in a City -
owned building constructed with Community Development Block
Grant funds.
The City Manager recommends approval of the budget adjustment,
in the amount of $5922.15, to be taken from Unreserved Fund
Balance. The funds would be used to repair ceiling and floor
damage caused by a water line in the ceiling of the facility
which froze and broke last winter.
F. Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City to participate
with the University of Arkansas in the cost of a study to compare
water quality in Mud Creek now and prior to the discharge of treated
sewage from the City's wastewater treatment plant;
The Mayor asked if any Director wished to request that any item be removed from
the Consent Agenda. The Mayor requested the removal of Item F.
It was moved by Vorsanger and seconded by Marinoni to approve the Consent Agenda.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
1
,
A
September 5, 1989`
MUD CREEK WATER QUALITY STUDY
` ,
In• reference to Item F, Martin explained that Mud Creek ran through his property,
and that in 1985 and 1986 when the first study was done, he abstained from the
decision in an effort to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest and
thought, in the interest of consistency, he should abstain again from the issue.
.
•
288.]
Director Vorsanger suggested that in the proposal where the figure is mentioned, 288.:
"cost not to exceed $10,000" be inserted. Martin said he thought that was
appropriate.
Upon roll call, the resolution was:approved,-6-0-1, Martin abstaining.
RESOLUTION 79-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
RECYCLING AWARENESS MONTH
The Mayor presented a proclamation to Edward Hejtmanek, representing "Trash
Busters", in which the September 23• Recycling Rally was endorsed by the City,
and in which the month of September was declared as "Recycling Awareness Month".
Hejtmanek, on behalf of "Trash Busters", expressed his appreciation to the Board
for the cooperation received from City employees in working towards realization
of an effective recycling program for the City. He said they realized the
recycling portion of the solid waste management program was only the first step
in what must be a massive effort to reduce, reuse and recycle as outlined in the
City Manager's Task Force report. He urged the Board to approve the funding
necessary to implement the drop off stations for recyclables, the yard waste
composting program, the household hazardous chemical pickup program, and to
develop a sanitation rate restructure that will reflect the urgent need to reduce
the waste stream in our society. He said the rates could be structured in a way
that reduction of waste will be rewarded, and inattention to the amount of waste
an individual generates becomes more costly. He said they believed the citizens
of Fayetteville were ready for and can appreciate the need for such
restructuring, and they will continue to work with the City to help educate
friends and neighbors about the need for and the mechanics of recycling and to
demonstrate to the institutional and commercial segments how important it is that
they join in the effort to reshape our lifestyle with regard to waste. He said
it was their intent to be a visible force in the community to fight waste and
refuse wherever they find it.
Special guest, "Trashbuster", addressed the Board, reminding them of the
Recycling Rally on September 23 at Wal Mart Fiesta Square. He urged the Board
to save their recyclables for the rally and observe how much it reduces their
solid waste. He thanked the City staff for their diligence but stressed that
we must continue our efforts to reduce solid waste.
The Mayor urged everyone to attend the Recycling Rally.
288.:
288./
288.`
288.(
288.',
September 5, 1989
289.1 Director Green noted this was the second recycling rally held in Fayetteville,
and commented that he felt the public was ready to recycle. He said it was a
great idea and something we can all get behind. He said it was a first step
towards solving our solid waste problem. He said the Trashbusters put in a
tremendous amount of effort.
289.2 Bonnie Schleiff, Fayetteville resident, asked how the handicapped and elderly
would be helped by the program. Scott Smith, City Recycling Coordinator, said
he and Trashbusters have been in contact with people who have volunteered to help
their neighbors who could not participate in the program, and act as small
recyclable haulers.
289.3 The Mayor said anyone wishing to participate in the rally should call the City
Manager's Office for assistance either in transportation or in transport of their
recyclables.
289.4
COMPOSTING CONTRACT
The Mayor introduced consideration of a resolution authorizing award of contract
for development of a municipal leaf and yard waste composting facility. He told
the Board the staff recommended award to the only qualified firm submitting a
proposal, Hileman-McKinney and Associates, proposing a fee of $24,400. He said
the budget contained $35,000 to cover the expense.
289.5 It was moved by Green and seconded by Martin to approve the resolution.
289.6 In answer to a question from a citizen, Public Works Director Bob Kelly said the
city anticipated being ready on the site, if city land can be identified, for
the fall. Kelly said the term of the contract is for one year.
289.7
289.8
289.9
Director Vorsanger said it should be pointed out that citizens will be able to
avail themselves of the end product.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
RESOLUTION 80-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
BID AWARD/RECYCLING DROP-OFF STATION CONTAINERS
The Mayor introduced award of Bid #89-38 for the purchase of seven recycling
drop-off station containers. He said the staff recommended the award to the only
bidder, Feberex, Inc. of Virginia Beach, Virginia, bidding $28,735. He said this
request was added to the agenda at this time so that the containers could be used
for the recycling rally.
289.10It was moved by Green and seconded by Marinoni to approve the recommendation.
September .5,.1989$...-
h
Director Vorsanger said about six months ago we declined.,the purchase of a truck
to be used to pick up recyclables. He asked how•we were going to pick them up
now. City Manager Pennington explained the original,prograin had changed from
door-to-door pickup to drop-off stations..
Director Spivey asked if the City had �a�crane available right now to pick up the
containers. Public Works Director telly said the City would have to purchase
a flatbed truck with a crane. He°said in the meantime the equipment would be
leased. .
Upon roll call, the motion passed,"14.
SANITATION RATE INCREASE
•
The Mayor introduced an ordinance to increase residential, commercial and load -
all sanitation rates to compensate for costs of operations; left on first reading
on August 15. He explained the increase would be in addition to the one adopted
on August 15 to pay off the incinerator. He said the proposed increase in
residential rates would amount to $2.38 per month, while the average increase
proposed for commercial rates would be $3.83 per month.
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the second time.
Director Green said he still felt this rate increase was really untimely. He
said he realized we had a real shortfall in the sanitation budget and needed to
do something about it very quickly. He noted. we were in the middle of re-
evaluating our rate structure and said, until we can look at the whole picture,
he really felt we should postpone this until staff can propose an entire program
instead of just an across-the-board rate increase. Green, seconded by Marinoni,
moved to postpone the ordinance until the City Manager and staff has had a chance
to look at the total rate structure.
290.1
290.4
290.:
290.2
290.`
290.E
Marinoni said that at the last meeting staff said they were in the process of 290.:
doing the study, and it was suggested then that the study would take until
November 1st to complete, or three months. Marinoni suggested limiting the
postponement to three months.
In answer to a question from Director Lancaster, Assistant City Manager Linebaugh
explained the commercial rate was just an average, and not necessarily on a per -
can basis. He said the rate would cover more than one can or a "load -all".
Director Kelley asked whether we had the time to delay the rate increase for 90
days. He said he would like a shorter delay, suggesting 30 days. Linebaugh said
he projected we would lose $500,000 this year, and the increase would amount to
approximately $60,000 per month, so a delay of three months would mean a loss
of .$180,000 in revenue. He said, financially, it would not "put us under" to
delay it.
290.1
290.'
September 5, 1989
291.1 City Manager Pennington said many alternatives have been developed and the sooner
these are brought before the Board the easier it will be to move into a new
system. He said all the alternatives being studied are designed to cut the cost
of operations, which means reducing the level of service. He said there is no
discussion at this point about increasing the level of service. Pennington said
he hoped, by the middle of October, to have a complete session with the Board
and the public to discuss the alternatives.
291.2 Director Vorsanger said two weeks ago, when the ordinance was read the first
time, he understood the ordinance would be read for the second time now, and a
third reading would take place in October, giving the Board sufficient time to
look at all the problems. He said the City hadn't had a rate increase since
1982 and it seemed to him that for the past seven years we ought to have been
studying the problem. He said the Board was now looking at a deficit of $500,000
for this year and really not doing very much about it. He said, if $180,000
isn't going to make that much difference, "then there's something wrong with
our bookkeeping". He said he thought it made a big difference. Vorsanger said
"there's nothing more permanent around this place than a temporary solution."
He said he thought we ought to move ahead with this, and added that we ought to
look at what we can do in cutting our services, keeping in mind the elderly and
those who can't afford to pay any increased rates.
291.3 Director Lancaster told the Board that about three years ago the staff worked
up a cost -of -service increase and told the Board at that time a rate increase
would be needed. He said the Board at that time saw fit to not even consider
it because of public opinion and the issue of the incinerator. He said he
thought the whole picture should be looked at, but said the longer we wait the
more we're going to be in trouble.
291.4 Director Vorsanger said he received a very thoughtful letter regarding the rate
increase written by Carol Hatcher and asked the City Clerk to enter it into the
record. He said the letter discussed the very problem of reducing some services.
291.4
291.6
Director Green said Vorsanger was correct in that we need to take immediate steps
towards being fiscally responsible, but said in any business enterprise there
are two ways to reduce a deficit - increase the fees or improve the efficiency.
He said he didn't think we had completely looked at how we can improve the
efficiency of our operation, and how we can equitably charge rates based on cost
of service, prior to just arbitrarily raising the rates.
Martin said the delay would hopefully result in citizens having a choice as to
the amount of increase they would have to bear, with those who produce less solid
waste having to pay less. He said it was clear we can't have unique solid waste
collection service for every individual, but thought we could do better than a
single rate for a broad class of customers. He said he favored the delay for
that reason.
291.7 Kelley asked if we knew yet how much money we would save between implementation
and the end of the year. City Manager Pennington said he thought the staff felt
comfortable that the $2.38 increase is needed to maintain twice weekly back -door
pickup, with once weekly trash pickup. He said it was intended all along to make
1
•
September 5, 1989;=
),
•
changes, but said he had no projections at this point'of cost savings. Kelley
asked if between now and the end of the year we will have cost savings and
projections, with a program implemented. NPennington said,,he wouldn't want to
stake his reputation on that. Kelley asked if waiting another 90 days would
cause the rate increase to be higher to make up for the continued deficit during
the time period. Pennington said he didn't think any staff could say "no, that's
not a possibility." Kelley said the only way he could support a delay in
sanitation rates would be if the delay were no longer than thirty days.
The Mayor asked for public cornnent.,,.
Fran Alexander, resident of Fox Hunter Road, said she was afraid that, if the
bill is not itemized, people will think recycling is the cause of the increase
in rates. She urged the staff to break down the increase between the cost of
operations and the cost of recycling on the bill. She suggested the citizens
pay for the service they receive, whether it be to take their trash to a
landfill, or whether they recycle their trash.
Director Vorsanger asked where the money for the recycling program was coming
from. Assistant City Manager Linebaugh said part of it will come from the
sanitation budget and the fixed asset costs will come from sales taxes.
Vorsanger asked which part would be paid from sanitation fees. Linebaugh said
operations costs, such as the Coordinator's salary, would come from sanitation
fees.
292.1
292.2
Vickie Kelley, speaking on behalf of Northwest Arkansas Waste Management, said 292.3
landfill prices were "in the air" and are going to keep climbing. She said they
were in a quandary, were filling up, losing space, and having expansions put on
hold. She said those things would "come back on the City" and be reflected in
present contract negotiations. She said they will have some limitations on
services they can offer. She said they can only receive what they are permitted
to receive, which has eliminated tires for the present time and which was the
basis for the recent denial of medical wastes. Kelley congratulated the City
for its efforts towards composting, commenting that these types of things will
reflect on the longevity of the landfill. She said for every ton of yard and
leaf waste taken out of the landfill, they can bury an additional three tons of
municipal garbage.
Director Spivey said an alternative solution would be a temporary increase until
January 1, after which time the increase would be removed, giving us time to put
new measures into operation. He said this would put the staff under a deadline
to complete their work and, hopefully, the amount of the increase could be rolled
back.
There being some questions regarding the intended length of the motion to
postpone, the Mayor stated it was for no certain time, that it was to be until
staff completed their study and that it had been suggested that study would be
completed by November 1.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-2, Directors Kelley and Spivey voting in
the minority.
292.4
292.`
292.E
September 5, 1989
CD FUNDS
293.1 The Mayor introduced consideration by the Board regarding the use of an
additional $16,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds; and a request for
approval of budget adjustments to transfer the funds to the Community Development
Program accounts.
293.2 The Mayor explained that, since the 1989 CD budget was approved in the amount
of $412,000, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has awarded the City
an additional $16,000 in funds. He said the City Manager recommends the funds
be allocated to the following Community Development activities:
Elderly Taxi Program $ 5,000
Administration 5,000
Public Improvements 6,000
The Mayor said the following Board action was necessary in connection with the
use of these additional funds:
293.3 A. A public hearing on the use of $5,000 to supplement current funding
being used for the Elderly Tau Program.
Because this program is a new activity, the public hearing is
required for input from the general public as to how these funds
might be used.
293.4 B. Approval of the recommendation that $11,000 of the additional funds
be allocated to supplement 1989 activities currently in progress,
as follows:
$5,000 to purchase an IBM Personal Computer and software for use by
Community Development staff; and $6,000 to supplement funds for
improvements to Block Street.
293.5 C. Approval of budget adjustments in the amount of $16,000 to transfer
the funds to the Canin;ty Development Program accounts.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
293.6 Elaine Walker, with the Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission,
distributed the most current statistics on the usage of the Elderly Taxi Program
from January through the end of August. Walker said her agency has been
evaluating and monitoring the program. Walker said the report shows the program
to be an overwhelming success, with ridership being far more than initially
anticipated. Walker said the Area Office on Aging provided 85% of the funding
up to this point.
293.7 Judy Williams, Program Administrator for the AAA of Northwest Arkansas, said most
of the elderly using the program are at or below poverty level. She said the
City was introducing transportation to people who might otherwise not have the
opportunity. She said if additional funding from their agency should become
;September 5, 1989,;.
•
available, they would be interested in`negotiating a higher contract with the
City.
Walker pointed out the program had advantages over other transportation programs,
in providing a greater flexibility and freedom over other fixed -route programs.
She emphasized that, through August, there have been no procedural or
administrative problems. She said the City had done a splendid job administering
the program She said C&H Taxi had,done a very good job'and was enthusiastic
about the program providing very accurate records.
294.1
There being no other public comments,_the public hearing was closed.
Director Vorsanger said he thought it was a wonderful program and said the 294.2
statistics show we are really serving a large part of our elderly community.
He said it was one of the best things ever done in Fayetteville.
The Mayor noted the recommendation for the usage of the additional $16,000 was 294.3
that $5,000 be used for the Elderly Taxi Program, $5,000 for the purchase. of an
IBM personal computer, and $6,000 for additional public improvements to Block
Street.
It was moved by Kelley and seconded by Vorsanger to approve the recommendation. 294.4
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
REZONING/R89-20
The Mayor introduced an ordinance rezoning property as requested in Rezoning 294.5
Petition R89-20.
Size of parcel: 1.72 acres
Location: At the northwest corner of Old Farmington Road and Shiloh Drive
Petitioner: Lee and Effie Pennington, by Kirk Elsass
Change requested: From A-1 "Agricultural" to C-2 "Thoroughfare Commercial
Planning Commission action: Recommended approval, 5-3
The Mayor said the petition was considered in a public hearing before the
Planning Commission on August 14, 1989 and the Planning Management Director
recommended approval of the rezoning.
He reported no public opposition was expressed at the hearing, and a motion to
recommend approval passed by a vote of 5-3, Commissioners Jacks, Seiff and
Springborn voting against the motion and Commissioner Nash being absent.
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Marinoni,
seconded by Kelley, moved to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its
294.E
294.;
294.:
September 5, 1989
second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read
for the second time. Director Marinoni, seconded by Kelley, moved to further
suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and final reading. Upon
roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read for the third time.
295.1 The Mayor noted the Board had toured the property that morning. It was also
noted the petitioner, Kirk Elsass, was present. The Mayor asked if anyone
present wished to speak against the ordinance. No public opposition was
expressed.
295.2 Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0. During roll call, Director Lancaster
said the only reason he voted for the ordinance was because there is C-2 zoning
all around the property.
ORDINANCE N0. 3447 APPEARS ON PAGE /,20 OF OpINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
XXV
REZONING/R89-21
295.3 The Mayor introduced consideration of an ordinance rezoning property as requested
in Rezoning Petition R89-21.
Size of parcel: 1 acre
Location: Along Shiloh Drive, north of Old Farmington Road
Petitioner: Morris I. Barnes and Vernon and Catherine Lirely, by Kirk Elsass
Change requested: From A-1 "Agricultural" to C-2 "Thoroughfare Commercial"
Planning Commission action: Recommended approval, 6-2
295.4
295.5
The Mayor reported the petition was considered in a public hearing before the
Planning Commission on August 14, 1989 and that the Planning Management Director
recommended approval of the rezoning.
There was no public opposition expressed at the hearing, and a motion to
recommend approval passed by a vote of 6-2, Commissioners Jacks and Springborn
voting against the motion, and Commissioner Nash being absent.
295.6 City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Kelley,
seconded by Marinoni, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance
on its second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance
was read for the second time. Director Kelley, seconded by Marinoni, made a
motion to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and
final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read
for the third time.
1
September 5, 1989
It was noted that Kirk Elsass was present to represent the petitioner. The Mayor 296.7
asked if anyone present wished to speak against the ordinance. No public
opposition was expressed.
Director Green commented that, since this was not a unanimous vote of the 296..
Planning Commission, he thought we• at least owed everyone an explanation. He
said, since both this tract ofl land and the previous tract (R89-20) was
essentially surrounded by commercial development, he thought it appropriate to
rezone, since there is an automatic buffer of R-2 zoning there. He said he
thought otherwise some Directors might want to stop strip -type commercial
development which he thought was a Concern of some commissioners.
Director Lancaster said this pointed out a weak link in our zoning. He said not
too long ago there was quite a controversy about where to stop commercial
encroachment to the north from Highway 62. He said the Commission and Board in
the past felt that Old Farmington Road should be, the boundary. He explained the
land for the proposed Ozark Cooperative Warehouse was zoned C-2 because it was
the only zoning where a warehouse could be located. He explained the warehouse
plans fell through.
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0.
296..
296.i
ORDINANCE NO. 3448 APPEARS ON PAGE /30 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK XX V
REZONING/R89-24
The Mayor introduced an ordinance rezoning property as requested in Rezoning
Petition R89-24. •
Size of parcel: 1.06 acres
Location: 1654 E. Zion Road
Petitioner: Jamie Jones
Change requested: From A-1 "Agricultural" to R-1 "Low Density Residential"
Planning Commission action: Recommended approval, 8-0
296.'
The Mayor said the petition was considered in a public hearing before the 296.1
Planning Commission on August 28, 1989, and that the Planning Management Director
recommended approval of the rezoning.
He said there was no public opposition expressed at the hearing, and a motion 296.'
to recommend approval passed by a vote of 8-0, Commissioner Ozment being absent.
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Lancaster, 296.1
seconded by Kelley, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance
on its second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance
September 5, 1989
was read for the second time. Director Lancaster, seconded by Kelley, made a
motion to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and
final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read
for the third time.
297.1 It was noted the petitioner was present. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to
speak against the ordinance. No public opposition was expressed.
297.2 Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 3449 APPEARS ON PAGE /3.2. OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
RECESS
297.3 The meeting recessed at 9:10 p.m. and reconvened at 9:20 p.m.
PROPERTY CLEANUP/513 S. LYTTON
297.4 The Mayor introduced an ordinance ordering the abatement of unsightly conditions
and the razing and removal of an unsafe structure located at 513 S. Lytton
Avenue.
297.5 City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Marinoni,
seconded by Lancaster, moved to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its
second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-2, Directors Martin and
Kelley voting in the minority. City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the
second time. Director Marinoni, seconded by Lancaster, moved to further suspend
the rules and place the ordinance on its third reading. Upon roll call, the
motion failed, 3-4, Directors Lancaster, Marinoni and Spivey voting for the
ordinance and Directors Vorsanger, Green, Martin and Kelley voting against the
ordinance. The ordinance remained on its second reading.
297.6 Freeman Wood, Inspection Superintendent, presented slides of the property to the
Board. Wood said a building permit was issued several months ago and work was
begun to repair the property but then stopped.
The Mayor asked if anyone present wished to speak for or against the ordinance.
297.7 Don Johnson, resident of Springdale, said he spoke on behalf of the property
owner, his aunt, Olive Johnson, who he said was 83 years old and in very poor
health. He asked for 60 days time to do something about the structure. He said
the family hoped, by October 1, to begin to do something to either remedy the
situation or tear down the structure. He said his aunt owned four other rent
houses, the income from which she makes a living, along with a small check.
297.8 Director Green, seconded by Kelley moved to postpone the third reading of the
ordinance for 60 days Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
•
September 5, 19891'
•
PROPERTY CLEANUP/1300 PETTIGREW STREET
•
•
The Mayor introduced an ordinance ordering the abatement of unsightly conditions
and the razing and removal of an unsafe structure located in the 1300 block of
Pettigrew Street; left on first reading on August 15. ,
•
•
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the second time.' Director Marinoni,
seconded by Lancaster, moved to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its
third and final reading. Upon roll` call, the motion failed, 4-3, Directors
Vorsanger, Lancaster, Marinoni and Spivey voting for the motion and Directors
Green, Martin and Kelley voting against the motion (five affirmative votes being
necessary to suspend the rules). The ordinance remained on its second reading.
The Mayor noted the Board toured`the property on August 15.
298.1
298.2
Director Green asked for the status of any repairs or cleanup of the property. 298.3
Inspection Superintendent Wood responded that it was not apparent that anything
had been done. He said attorney Rick Osborne called him in the morning and said
he would try to talk to the owner and see if she would authorize the expenditure
of funds to clean up the property and, if she would, he would get the property
cleaned up. Director Lancaster pointed out that the letter from Osborne asking
for twenty days to clean up the property was dated August 15.
PROPERTY CLEANUP/411 S. LOCUST
The Mayor introduced an ordinance ordering the abatement of unsightly conditions 298.4
and the razing and removal of an unsafe structure located at 411 S. Locust
Avenue; left on first reading on August 15.
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the second time. Director Vorsanger, 298.°
seconded by Green, moved to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its
third reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-2, Directors Martin and
Kelley voting in the minority. The ordinance was read for the third time.
The Mayor noted the Board had toured the property and seen slides of the property 298.E
at the last meeting.
Director Green said the reason he would prefer to accelerate the passage of this
ordinance was because he felt it presented an immediate safety problem. He said
the building was burned out and looked like it was about to fall down. He added
that children were seen playing in the vicinity.
Director Marinoni said he was anxious for action to be taken on the property. 298.E
He said two weeks ago he observed an electrical wire, once connected to the
building, which had burned loose and was hanging loose in the yard. He said as
of today not even the removal of the electrical wire had been done.
The Mayor asked if anyone present wished to speak for or -against the ordinance.
No public comments were expressed.
298.;
September 5, 1989
299.1 Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE N0. 3450 APPEARS ON PAGE /3'( OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
XX✓
299.2
PROPERTY CLEANUP/707 N LEVERETT
The Mayor introduced an ordinance ordering the abatement of unsightly conditions
and the razing and removal of an unsafe structure located at 707 N. Leverett
Avenue; left on first reading on August 15.
299.3 City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the second time. There being no motion
to suspend the rules, the ordinance was left on its second reading.
299.4 In answer to a question from Director Green, Planning Director Merrell said the
staff could contact all the owners of the property prior to the next reading of
the ordinance.
299.5 Director Vorsanger said it looked to him today that there had been some attempt
to fix up the property.
299.6 The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak for or against the ordinance.
299.7 Don Dees, representing the owner, told the Board that Building Superintendent
Freeman Wood pointed out to him he needed a building permit. He said he informed
the owner and this afternoon obtained his signature on an application for a
building permit. He said in the next couple of days he would obtain the permit.
He said work has been done, such as painting, removing broken glass, loose wire,
all trash and debris around the house. He said they were working to get the
house up to Code.
299.8
299.9
EASEMENT VACATION/VALLEY ADDITION
The Mayor introduced an ordinance vacating and abandoning a portion of a utility
easement located in the Valley Addition. He said the owner, James Lambeth, is
requesting the east 10 feet of the easement be vacated. He said utility
companies and Warner Cable have concurred in the request and the City Manager
recommended approval.
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Kelley,
seconded by Martin, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance
on its second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance
was read for the second time. Director Kelley, seconded by Marinoni, made a
motion to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and
final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read
for the third time.
1
September 5, 1989k
The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the 300.1
ordinance. No public comments were expressed. Upon roll call, the ordinance
passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 3451 APPEARS ON PAGE 04 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK X X ✓
SMOKING REGULATED
The Mayor introduced consideration of an ordinance to regulate smoking in certain 300.2
places in Fayetteville; tabled on December 20, 1988.
The Mayor explained that a petition was filed in July of 1987 by citizens who 300.3
supported an ordinance that would prohibit or restrict smoking in certain public
places in the City. He said the northwest Arkansas chapter of "Arkansans for
Nonsmokers' Rights" proposed such an ordinance which was reviewed at a Board
agenda session but deferred so city staff could research similar ordinances in
other cities and what impact an ordinance would have on proprietors of retail
eating establishments.
The Mayor said a revised ordinance was proposed by the City Manager at a November
1988 City Board meeting where public comments were heard, and that further
revisions were made to theordinance and considered at a December 1988 Board
meeting. He said that "Arkansans for Nonsmokers' Rights".proposed an addition
to the ordinance at that same meeting.
300.4
The Mayor said the City Manager's ordinance' was read -for the first time on 300.5
December 20 and public comments were heard. 'He said -the ordinance was tabled
for six months, although a resolution was approved,.encouraging the private
sector to voluntarily adopt a policy to restrict smoking in public places to
designated areas.•r
5
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Marinoni, 300.E
seconded by Kelley, moved to suspend the rules and place the.ordinance on its
second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-2, Directors Vorsanger and
Martin voting in the minority. The ordinance was read for the second time.
Director Marinoni, seconded by Kelley, moved.t6 further suspend the rules and
place the ordinance on its third and final' reading. Upon roll call, the motion
failed, 4-3, Directors Lancaster, Kelley, Marinoni and Spivey voting for the
motion and Directors Vorsanger, Green and Martin voting against it (five
affirmative votes being necessary to suspend the rules). -e -The ordinance remained
on its second reading. 1
City Manager Pennington said he discussed the ordinance with Dr. Richard Back, 300.;
representing the "Arkansans for Nonsmokers' Rights" and they felt in the next
few weeks they would like to determine what has occurred: in restaurants since
December. Pennington said he felt this was appropriate. He said the group would
like to conduct another survey, in conjunction with City staff, to see what
changes have taken place in restaurants and other facilities surveyed in 1988.
He said he assumed the survey would be done in the next two weeks.
September 5, 1989
301.1 Mayor Martin, seconded by Vorsanger, moved to postpone the ordinance until the
survey from "Arkansans for Nonsmokers' Rights" is received.
301.2 Director Vorsanger asked what would be surveyed by the group. Martin replied
that the last time the ordinance came up it was tabled to see if voluntary
compliance could result in a significant increase in availability of non-smoking
areas in restaurants. He said he thought it was important data for the Board
to consider.
301.3 Marinoni suggested the postponement be for a period of one month. Narinoni,
seconded by Green, moved to amend the motion to defer the ordinance for thirty
days
301.4 Director Lancaster said he thought there had been lots of improvement in six
months, pointing out that hospitals and doctors have no -smoking rules in their
facilities, and most restaurants have signs for non-smoking areas. He said he
thought some action should be taken on the ordinance.
301.5 Director Martin said the hospitality industry indicated it would comply
voluntarily and said that was important information which has a bearing on the
need to regulate the matter. He said no one liked the idea of regulating things,
but the question was whether or not non-smokers would have the same rights as
smokers, to enjoy eating at a facility without smoke.
301.6 Director Green said he felt we needed to keep the ordinance moving but not to
its third reading until we have as much data as possible. He said he didn't want
to keep postponing it indefinitely.
301.7 Director Kelley said he thought the staff should be reminded they promised to
research what impact such an ordinance would have on proprietors of retail eating
establishments.
301.8 Director Vorsanger said he would like to hear from the Hospitality Industry as
well on what their experience has been in the past six months.
The Mayor asked for public comment for or against the ordinance.
301.9 Coy Kaylor, Fayetteville resident, said restaurants will respond to their
customers' demands for smoking and non-smoking areas, or they don't survive in
their business. He said nobody in any business wants some government body
legislating any rule that will potentially get into their pocket. He said his
restaurant seats about 250, and at lunch 60 of these seats are designated for
non-smokers, while 58 are reserved for smokers. He said in the evening, when
there is less of a demand for non-smoking, he reserves 38 seats for non-smokers
and 80 for smokers. He said anything which infringes on his ability to sell
those seats will also infringe on the City's ability to collect sales tax
revenue. He said Fayetteville would be the only City in the state with a smoking
ordinance. He said he would like for once to not be the first to do this and
would like to see the Board do something to support business. He said the
ordinance did not address tobacco shops or cocktail lounges.
September 5, 1989:.
The Mayor said he didn't think this ordinance would really affect Kaylor's
restaurant. Kaylor said he didn't want to go around the restaurant every day
moving no -smoking signs around. The Mayor said it seemed Kaylor was already
substantially complying with the ordinance. Kaylor said he thought we had too
many rules and regulations and didn't think they were necessarily good.
Director Vorsanger said since Kaylor was already designating separate areas in 302.:
his restaurant, he thought he was opposed to the part of the ordinance which
states "in areas where smoking is permitted existing physical barriers and
ventilation systems shall be used to the greatest extent possible to minimize
the smoke in adjacent non-smoking areas." Kaylor said the whole ordinance
offended him deeply but that part really offended him, because he feared that
next year someone would mandate that he had two years to install "smoke eaters."
Vorsanger said he agreed with Kaylor and would vote against the ordinance.
Director Green asked Kaylor how he would propose solving..the problem for those 302.:
with serious allergies and problems who might make a special trip to his
restaurant. Kaylor said he would do the best to accommodate such people who want
a non-smoking area. Green said he didn't know what the 'answer was other than
creating a totally smoke-free world. Green said he was a former smoker who
smoked for twenty years. He said only until you get in the other person's shoes
do you appreciate their point of view. He said he tended to think we were over-
regulated but said we were seeing a nationwide trend,. because people are
accepting the fact that smoking ishazardous'to your health. He said this was
creating a new wave of demanding rights for non-smokers: He said he felt that
ultimately we were going to see smoking regulated on.a national level and would
like to see totally voluntary compliance. He said he,would like to see smoke-
free places to work and eat, and the only way 'this would happen would be for
everyone to quite smoking. He said a goal for Fayetteville might be "Smoke-free
by '93." Green said, however, he didn't want to create an ordinance that we
can't enforce or that will adversely affect business and economic development.
Director Kelley said, before the'ordinance was put in final form, the staff 302.E
looked at several ordinances nationwide. 'Kelley said he thought the ordinance
was a good compromise. He asked Kaylor if he was saying the ordinance was not
a workable solution or compromise.. Kaylor said he thought€it might be a workable
compromise but thought, if it was already being done, the dumbest thing we could
do is legislate it. He said he thought it was restrictive to his rights as a
businessman and to everybody else who runs a restaurant.' He said until you have
been in the hospitality business, he wasn't sure you had a -right to an opinion.
Kelley said people with children who can't sleep after breathing secondary smoke
have a right to make a decision about -non-smoking areas in restaurants and public
places. He said an attitude about discriminating against him because he doesn't
smoke gives him an indication of which way to vote on a non-smoking ordinance.
Dan Coody, Fayetteville resident, said smoking ordinances were not new, stating 302.`
there have been such ordinances around the country for years. He asked what
point there was in waiting for another survey to be done. He said he thought
it was time to get something going on the issue.
302.]
September 5, 1989
503.1 Dave Bassett said the majority of the City's revenue came from sales tax coming
from small businesses. He said a lot of small businesses are located in
Fayetteville, and the only two things Fayetteville has on Springdale in the way
of small businesses is more attorneys and more restaurants. He said we could
either leave the issue alone and let the businessman make the decision for
himself, or ban smoking completely. He said the proposed ordinance was wishy-
washy. Bassett said he was a non-smoker and, although he didn't ban smoking in
his restaurant (B & B Barbecue) you have to ask for an ashtray if you want to
smoke.
303.2
Robert Reus spoke in support of the ordinance. He said his rights were being
restricted when he is exposed to others smoking in public places. He said
cigarette smoke had a substantial amount of hydrogen cyanide gas, and he had a
right to restrict this from his body.
303.3 Wayne Dyer, owner of the Hushpuppy Restaurant, said he was a non-smoker. He said
he had operated his business over the past six months no differently than he has
over the last 12 years - that is, to take care of whatever the customers demand.
He said if his customers ask for 100% non smoking, that's what he'd give them.
He said if has people in his lobby waiting to be seated and can't seat them
because of the ordinance, this would cost him money. He said, although there
has been discussion about the rights of smokers and the rights of non-smokers,
there hadn't been discussion about the rights of the business owners who have
made financial investments. He said the decision should be left to the
restaurant owners and their paying customers. He asked that we don't over -
regulate. He said he did provide a no -smoking area for his customers.
303.4 In answer to a question from Lancaster, Dyer said he hadn't made any changes in
his operations over the last six months because he already had a no -smoking
section.
303.5 Upon roll call, the motion to amend the motion to postpone the ordinance for
thirty days, passed by a vote of 6-1, Director Vorsanger voting in the minority.
303.6 Upon roll call, the amended motion, to postpone the ordinance for thirty days
passed by a vote of 7-0.
303.7
LEGAL SERVICES/INCINERATOR WITHDRAWAL
The Mayor introduced a request from the City Manager for approval of a budget
adjustment to cover payment of fees to McDermott, Will and Emery, for legal
services from May 8 through June 30, 1989, in connection with the City's
withdrawal from the solid waste resource recovery project.
It was moved by Martin and seconded by Kelley to approve the request.
303.8 Director Marinoni asked why the budget adjustment was requested in the amount
of $90,620 while the bill from the attorneys totalled $26,697.43. City Manager
1
R.,. September 5, 1989
Pennington said he estimated the $90,620 would carry us through to the end of
the year.
Martin re -stated his motion to approve the budget adjustment in the amount of
$90,620. The motion was seconded by Kelley.
Pennington explained he projected anticipated monthly bills through the end of 304.3
the year from McDermott, Will and Emery and from the Niblock Firm.
304.1
304.2
Director Vorsanger asked when this drain on our resources would end, commenting 304.4
that we were averaging $127 per hour. Pennington said his best estimate is well
into next year, if progress continues as is.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
•
DICKSON STREET IMPROVEMENTS
The Mayor introduced consideration of a resolution authorizing award of contract
for consulting services for the Walton Arts Center Impact Area on Dickson Street.
He said the contract would provide the planning, design and engineering for the
Dickson Street parking, street improvements, drainage improvements and control
of the overall scope of the projects in the area He said the City Manager and
Selection Committee recommended award to RM Plan Group of Nashville, Tennessee,
for a maximum not -to -exceed cost of $225,000. ^He said it was anticipated that
funding would be available in the Sales Tax Construction Fund.
Public Works
phase only.
It was moved
improvements
304.5
304.6
Director Bob Kelly amended.the request to be $125,000 for the first 304.7
ifs
4
by Green and seconded by Martin, oto approve the first phase of the 304.8
. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
RESOLUTION 81-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE,AND RESOLUTION BOOK
BID WAIVER/PHONE SYSTEM
•
•
,
The Mayor introduced an ordinance waiving competitive,bidding requirements and 304.'
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with Southwestern
Bell Telephone Company for a central office based telecommunications system.
He explained the City Manager recommends approval of the ordinance and lease of 304.]
the PLEXAR II Communications System from Southwestern Bell Telephone Company,
to replace the City's existing PBX telephone system. He said the lease would
be for a term of 60 months, at a not -to -exceed monthly rate of $4,500.
He told the Board total capital costs are estimated at $35,475, with current
expenses totalling $10,475 for installation charges. He said, with $20,000
304.:
105.1
305.2
305.3
September 5, 1989
budgeted for capital costs, it is anticipated that a future request for a budget
adjustment will be brought before the Board when telephone equipment is purchased
through the bidding process.
City Attorney Rose read the ordinance for the first time. Director Marinoni,
seconded by Martin, moved to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its
second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read
for the second time. Director Marinoni, seconded by Lancaster, moved to further
suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and final reading. Upon
roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read for the third time.
Assistant City Manager Linebaugh said the staff studied many systems and felt
overall, that cost -wise this was the best way for the City to go. He said we
were "maxed out" on the system now and were having major repair problems. He
said the proposal would be cheaper than going with a PBX system although more
costly than our current bill.
Marinoni asked if there would be any salvage value on the PBX system we currently
own. Linebaugh estimated $2,000 to $3,000 of salvage value.
305.4 Vorsanger asked if we would own the system after five years of paying a maximum
of $4,500 per month. Linebaugh said we would only lease the equipment. He said
it was estimated we would begin paying $2,452 per month and it would be several
years before we would pay the maximum monthly rent. Vorsanger said he thought
the bill for the next five years would be "pretty hefty" when you consider the
lease costs, capital costs and installation costs. City Manager Pennington
replied that this was not unusual when you convert this size organization to that
type of system. He said the system is designed to be updated over time.
Assistant City Manager Linebaugh said over the long term this will cost us more
than outright capital costs, but this will be $1,000 cheaper per month than it
would be to buy a PBX. He said bidding procedures must take place to purchase
telephones.
305.5
Director Lancaster said he thought the major mistake was buying our existing
phone system to start with. He said the same mistake was made when we bought
the computer system.
305.6 In answer to a question from Director Kelley, Linebaugh said a budget adjustment
was not requested at this time, but when equipment is purchase later funds will
be requested to be taken from unused audit expense, telephone expense, and unused
printer costs.
305.7 Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 3452
APPEARS ON PAGE /37
OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
xx1/
1
zt
September 5, 1989,
CITY MANAGER AUTHORITY
The Mayor introduced an ordinance amending the City Code of Ordinances to
increase the purchasing and contracting authority of the City Manager. He
explained that, in January of this year, an ordinance was approved which expanded
the purchasing authority of the City Manager from a maximum of $2,500 to a
maximum of $10,000. He said the ordinance under consideration would authorize
the City Manager to be the contracting agent for the City, would allow him to
enter into contracts for services, the lease of land, the sale of property and
the construction of municipal services. He said the ordinance would apply to
purchases and contracts not in excess of $10,000.
•
306.1
The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Vorsanger, 306.2
seconded by Kelley, moved to suspend.the rules and place the ordinance on its
second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read
for the second time. Director Kelley, seconded by Vorsanger, made a motion to
further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and final reading.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was read for the third
time.
•
The Mayor asked if the public had any comments. No comments were expressed. 306.3
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0..
ORDINANCE NO. 3453 APPEARS ON PAGE /38 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK X
OTHER BUSINESS
•
•
l
WATER LINE BREAK/SOUTH WOOD STREET
4.
•
John Beard, resident of Oak Bailey Drive, addressed the Board on behalf of his 306.4
mother, resident of 1000 Wood Street'.' He said last night there was a major water
line break on S. Wood Street, which he.said was the third time in a year this
has occurred. He said the street had a flooding problem.' He said he thought
the water line was about 35 years old and said some of the neighbors originally
participated in the cost of its original installation. He said they were not
getting much results over the phone and asked if the City would participate by
providing a load of gravel, and a couple of hours labor to clean up sewage and
the mess which was caused. .
Mayor Martin said he had received a call from a neighbor of Beard's mother who 306.`
said there had been seven breakages in the last ten years at that location. He
said he tried to call the staff but was unable to make a connection.
Public Works Director Kelly said he talked with one of the property owners today
and assured her that it is the City's policy to repair driveway damage caused
by water line leaks. He said a water system study was due any time now.
Beard said, when something like this happened, he thought the City should contact
the property owners to apologize and tell them what will be done, instead of
306.(
306.;
September 5, 1989
waiting until people start calling and complaining. Kelly said the City had 371
water leaks last year.
307.1 Mayor Martin asked Kelly what level of priority the Wood Street area would have
in the water line replacement program Kelly said he did not know at this time.
Beard asked what department he should contact for help. Mayor Martin assured
Beard that the Public Works Department would be in contact with him.
ARTS CENTER PROJECT/BID WAIVER & CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
307.2 Public Works Director Kelly told the Board the City has been informed by bond
counsel that, since the Arts Center was unable to get under construction in a
three-year period, parking construction should begin by November 15. He said
the staff proceeded to select RM Plan Group to do the Master Plan for the Impact
Area, and now requests an ordinance waiving the competitive bidding requirements
for the construction of the parking (mainly site preparation, demolition and
drainage preparation) awarding a contract, and approving a budget adjustment for
those items. He said a special Board meeting will have to be called to approve
the purchase of the property.
307.3
City Manager Pennington reported the bonds for the City's portion of the Arts
Center project were issued in December of 1986, and the bond issue called for
the project to be completed in three years. He said the bonds were tax-free and,
if the project is not completed in a three-year time period, and/or if you don't
have a letter -ruling from IRS, the tax-free bonds become taxable. Pennington
said that was a serious concern. He said the situation was not anyone's fault.
He said staff has been preparing an IRS letter in conjunction with bond counsel,
requesting a letter -ruling. He said it was their feeling that roughly $105,000
needs to be expended by November 15 to retain the tax-free status on the bonds.
He said, although the City was already obligated to spend this money, it didn't
expect to have to do it under these circumstances. He said he received a draft
of the letter to the IRS for a letter -ruling today.
307.4 Kelly said the award of contract will actually be for $160,000. He said that
was the low bid of two contractors with whom the City negotiated.
307.5 The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Marinoni,
seconded by Lancaster, moved the suspend the rules and place the ordinance on
its second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. The ordinance was
read for the second time. Director Marinoni, seconded by Lancaster, moved to
further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on its third and final reading.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. the ordinance was read for the third
time.
307.6 In answer to a question from Director Marinoni, Kelly said the staff recommended
award of contract to Sweetser, whose bid was about $60,000 less than that of
McClinton Anchor. Director Green asked Kelly why we were waiving the bidding
if bids had been taken. Kelly explained the staff actually negotiated with the
two contractors rather than utilizing the formal bidding process.
1
September 5, 19894
The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment. No public comments 308.1
were made. Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 3454 APPEARS ON PAGE /Y o OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK X X ✓
NATIONAL CEMETERY FUNDING REQUEST
The Mayor asked the Directors if they wished to consider the request to be placed 308.:
on the next agenda from the National Cemetery Improvement Corporation, for a
$25,000 contribution. There was no objection from Directors or staff to placing
this item on the next agenda. i t
s
ARTS CENTER PROJECT/CONTRACT AWARD
The City Manager asked the Board to approve the award of contract to Sweetser 308._
Construction for constructing the Arts Center parking lot.". Public Works Director
Kelly said the contract amount would,be $160,400., Kelly.said the contract amount
included estimated quantities which he said were the'_"best guess" quantities
now available.
It was moved by Marinoni and seconded by Green to approve the resolution. Upon 308.2
roll call, the motion passed, 7-0. t
RESOLUTION 81A-89 APPEARS ON PAGE OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK
.ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:20.p.m.
•
•