HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-01-07 Minutes1 I
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE FAYETTEVILLE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A regular meeting of the Fayetteville Board of Directors was held
on Tuesday; January 7, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. in the Directors' Room of
the City.Administration Building at 113 WestMountain Street, Fayetteville,
Arkansas:
PRESENT: Mayor Noland; Directors Hess, Johnson, Lancaster, Martin
.and titan; Acting- City Manager Murphy,. City Attorney
McCord, City Clerk Kennedy, members of the press and
• audience. -
ABSENT: Director Bumpass
CALL;"TO .ORDER
Mayor Noland called the meeting to order, with six Directors present,
and asked for a moment -of respectful silence.
REPORT TO, THE. PUBLTC ;&. BOARD
Mayor Noland. explained that, beginning with thismeeting, and on the
first Tuesday of every month, the Acting :City Manager will present
a "Report to the. Public and Board" on the ongoing progress of the
reorganization, on .such issues as safety and other items of general
interest.
Acting City Manager Jim Murphy reported on those accomplishments made
since the start of the budget process. Murphy stated the budget was
prepared and completed in 48 !days -through a tremendous effort on the
part of city employees. Murphy explained this year's budget was written
.in a "program" format - the first step in attempting to fully implement
a program budget in 1987. A program budget, Murphy explained, details
out specific programs for each of the three new divisions, -along with
goals, robjectives and strategies expected to :be.Terformed in order
to accomplish the -1986 budget. Murphy said the budget has•been'brought
to the* first step of:a. "full. services mode"- and into the mode' of the
new reorganization.
Regarding reorganization, Murphy .reported that to date it has been
developed: and implemented. Murphy said resumes have been received
for the three new major department head positions, and that. City Manage*
Don Grimes has begun to review resumes and list his initial preferences.
Murphy. stated that, based on the availability, of Grimes in late January,
the resumes will -be narrowed down to four or five.candidates to bring
beforea panel to be interviewed for final selection.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
V V t..
•
January 7, 1986
2.1 Murphy explained that the initial reorganization has been put into
effect by appointing temporary department heads and that all departments
are now functioning with new reporting relationships.
2.2 In the Public Works Division, Murphy explained the consolidation of
the work force has started. Water and Sewer Departments have been
combined at the Cato Springs Road Operations Center. Cross -training
between the Street Department's and Water and Sewer Department's crews
will begin shortly for maintenance work. Murphy stated the process
has begun for developing procedures for the new Construction Division.
Murphy reported that a retired executive, Robert Harris, working through
a Retired Executive Program, has been engaged at no cost to the city,
to assist in the development of those procedures.
2.3 Through the budget process, Murphy said emphasis is being placed on
strengthening the needs of the Police and Fire Departments. Murphy
said the city's strengths are being developed in the areas where per-
formance should be at its best level -- those being services, maintenance
and protection, at the least possible cost to the taxpayer. Murphy
reported that employees are being trained daily in the expectations
and what it will take to fulfill those expectations.
2.4 Murphy reported that supervisory training began today under a contract
of courses taught by Lawrence -Leiter and Company and that results
of today's session were outstanding. Murphy said there was very positive
feedback from the employees.
2.5 Murphy said that the planning process has started with all supervisors,
with input being obtained at all levels, as well as assistance from
the supervisors in the development of the planning.
2.6 Regarding the performance audit, Murphy reported that implementation
is proceeding with all the accepted performance audit recommendations.
Murphy noted that, where reductions were recommended, these were cut
out of the 1986 budget. Murphy reported that operational recommendations
are being implemented on a daily basis.
2.7 Murphy presented an update of the sewer plant construction. He reported
that construction is 26.6% complete, with about 2% of that work being
completed in December. Construction progress slowed somewhat due
to the holiday season and several short periods of very cold weather
which prevented extensive concrete work. The majority of the work
completed involved the following structures: the administration building,
primary clarifiers, secondary clarifiers, aeration basins, chlorine
contact tank, chlorination building and the belt press.
2.8 Regarding the Solid Waste project, Murphy reported that currently
$22 million in financing has been obtained to approve, develop and
start the project in 1986, through the purchase of tax-free municipal
bonds.
•
January 7,-1986
Murphy reported'that the Public Works Division has begun t� determine
their working needs in advance, getting organized better and getting
people on the fob faster than ever before.
Murphy reported that meetings are being held with Administrative Services
to combine forms necessary for reporting scheduling needs and payroll
and production =information.
Murphy commerited=that the reorganization -is very f-ar'ahead of schedule
and stated -that he had. never. 'seen such a level of effort coming from
employees`•''who shave 'every right 'to feel insecure. --Murphy added that
employees -have&-done a tremendous• :-job and a lot will, be accomplished
in the next six months.
MUSIC F.ESTIVAL,FUNDINCREQUEST
The Mayor introduced a request from the Music Festival of Arkansas
for funding for 1986, of $5500, to cover printing costs and audio
taping 'the 1986 Music Festival for use in the Public Broadcasting
Network.
Dick Atkinson; spoke on behalf of. the request. Atkinsoh explained
that the Music Festival of Arkansas is a non-profit organization which
sponsors the Music Festival every year, for two weeks, in various
locations in Fayetteville. Atkinson said at least_ 4,000 people attended
the Festival last year.- He pointed out three things which characterize
the Music:Festival = quality, ability -to operate on a stringent level,
and the vision -that Fayetteville could become known as "the home of
the Music Festival of Arkansas":
•
Atkinson noted that in 1986, in conjunction with the Arkansas Sesquleen-
tennial the Music Festival has' commissioned'•air original compositioh
by an'Lkfkarisas"L'compbsei`-torbe ptemiered:on •June 15.;.-•Atkinson'stated
the Arkansas Arts Council"'has promised $5,000 ;to the' Music =Festival
if the Music Festival can raise $10,000. Atkinson stated a contribution
from the city of $5500 would help the Music Festival reach their goal
of $10,000.
Atkinson explaitned.that $5500 from the city would pay for audio -taping
of the Music Festival for national public radio, and would cover the
costs of printing programs.
Director Orton expressed her disappointment 'that the. Advertising and
Promotion Commission had not granted a request from the Music Festival
for funding of $3,000 for advertising and promotion.
Orton made a `motion that the Board recommend -that the Advertising
and Promotion Commission reconsider and grant the Festival $3,000
5
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
gi
January 7, 1986
4.1 and that the City Board grant $2500 for the audio -taping of the Festival.
There was no second to the motion.
4.2 Orton added that $15,000 is included in the Advertising and Promotion
Fund's budget for special projects.
4.3 Director Martin suggested the Board allocate the $5500 now, and contact
the Advertising and Promotion Commission regarding the $3,000 request
at a later date. Director Johnson made a motion to allocate $5500
to the Music Festival, with the proviso that, if the Advertising and
Promotion Cosission should act on the Masse Festival's $3,000 request
at a later date, they then would reimburse the city for that amount.
Director Martin seconded the motion.
4.4 In answer to a question from the Mayor regarding from which fund the
$5500 would be taken, Director Martin responded that the Finance Committee
would make that determination.
4.5 Mayor Noland explained that, of the $15,000 in the Advertising and
Promotion Fund's special projects' budget, about $12,000 is under
contract to the Chamber of Commerce for advertising purposes.
4.6 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0, with Director Bumpass absent.
ARKANSAS ARTS COUNCIL GRANT
4.7 The Mayor introduced a request from the Parks and Recreation Department
for authorization to apply for an Arkansas Arts Council grant. The
Mayor noted that similar grants were authorized by the Board in past
years.
4.8 Director Orton node a motion to authorize the application for the
Ark Arts Council grant. The notion vas seconded by Director
Lancaster and, upon roll call, passed by a vote of 6-0.
APPOINTMENTS
4.9 Director Johnson, Chairman of the Board Nominating Committee, presented
a report from that committee's meeting of January 7, 1986. The recom-
mendations from the committee were as follows:
For terms ending 1-1-89 on the Northwest Arkansas
Regional Planning Commission:
Ernest Lancaster
David C. McClinton
Warren J. McDonald
C. Larry Tompkins
January 7, 1986
For .a.term ending 17.1-91 on. the Fayetteville Housing
Authority Board of Commissioners:
' Robert Windham
For .terms;ending 1-1-90.on the'Planning Commission:
Frank Fairish
Julie Nash
Paul Skwiot
For a..term.ending 171-88 on the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board:
Bill Waite
For an indefinite term on the .Firemen's Relief
and Pension Fund Board, to fill the Fire Chief's .
position as required by statute:
Mickey Jackson
Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the
recommendations of the Nominating Committee.
•
Johnson explained that one additional appointment to the Planning
Commission will be made at the next regular meeting.
•
Upon roll.call the motion passed, 6-0.
AIR. tIUSEUM, ENDORSEMENT
The Board considered a resolution endorsing the concept of the Arkansas
Air Museum, at Drake Field.f..
Director Johnson, as Fayetteville Chairman for the Arkansas Sesquicen-
tennial, explained the Arkansas Air Museum was -chosen as a city-wide.
project.. Johntoin :iaoted: that=:the :"old..white. hangar", .as.. a choice of
locationforthenmuseutm,.::istbelieved to.bethe• oldest-airport.structure.
in Northwest.ArkansasJohnson.reported.that-the. committee has discussed
the esfalilishmeiit:of:a regional air:huseutwithiocal citizens;: represen-
tatives of the Arkansas Aviation Historical Society, and the University
of Arkansas Museum. Johnson noted that donations of aircraft to start
the museum have been offered, as well as historical photographs and
documents.
Director Johnson,• seconded by Lancaster, made a motion Ito. adopt a
resolution endorsing the concept of establishing the Arkansas Air
Museum.
005
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
00f;
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
January 7, 1986
Director Lancaster noted that the museum is only in the planning stage
and that It was hoped to raise funds privately in the community to
finance the project.
Director Orton noted that money was included in the 1986 budget for
some necessary repair work to the "old white hangar" but that beyond
those repairs, additional money would have to be made as contributions
to a non-profit organization which would operate the museum.
Director Martin added that, although he thought the idea of a museum
was a good one, the question should be addressed of whether there
is an ongoing need for the business presently being operated in the
hanger, and whether the museum is the highest and best use for the
building.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 1-86 APPEARS ON PAGE 207 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK xxIII
UNSIGHTLY PROPERTY
The Mayor explained that, at the December 17 meeting, an ordinance
ordering the razing and removal of an unsafe structure, located at
the northeast corner of South School Avenue and llth Street, was left
on third reading. The Mayor reported that the son of the property
owner is making arrangements to have the property razed. Upon the
advice of the City Attorney, the Mayor noted that no additional action
was necessary at this time.
Director Lancaster asked that a deadline be imposed by which time
the razing of the structure must take place. The City Attorney advised
that the ordinance could be tabled for a specified number of days.
The Mayor suggested that, in light of cold weather, a deadline of
6-8 weeks be imposed.
Director Lancaster commented that the property was a disgrace to the
town, and he made a motion to leave the ordinance on the table and,
if the razing and remoral is not completed according to specifications
by February 4, the Board take further action. The motion was seconded
by Director Johnson and, upon roll call, passed by a vote of 4-2,
with Martin and Noland voting in the minority.
SIGN APPEAL/715 N. COLLEGE
The Mayor introduced an appeal
sign ordinance for a sign to be
R-0, "Residential -Office" zoning
from the literal provisions of the
located at 715 North College in an
district. The Mayor explained that
January 7, 1986
the petitioner, Kirk Johnson,' requests permission to install a 12
square.: foot,..:five foot_:liigh, free-standing sign .on' a'1 retaining wall
which is appioximately :20 feet above _the street'. The Mayor noted
the ordinance requires thatthe display _surface area of the.sign shall
not exceed four square feet and should be set back a minimum of 15
feet from streetyright-of-way. .
Dr. Kirk Johnson explained that:the proposed sign would be double-faced
and that he makes the request because of the many complaints he has
received from .patients regarding the lack of visibility' of his office
from the -street. Johnson noted that. there is, no middle lane. at the
point on the highway where •his office IS -located and that ..there have
been many -accidents.
Director Orton remarked that this was an unusual situation and stated
that the 'request for a 'variance on. the height was propei. In answer
to a ,question. from Ortoii,'Dr. Johnson stated..the railing is about
17 feet back from the highway. Orton questioned whether .the -:amount
of , variance requested , on the setback and on the square footage was
necessary. Dr..Johnson stated he thought the proposed locatiom..was
"about the only place the -sign could be located" on his:property.
He stated that the -area in front of the office is a parking lot and
a drop-off fettle -top of '.a ;retaining wall, leaving the -only location
for the sign to be up against the'edge'.'ofthe` railing. `Dr. Johnson
stated that the size of the sign was recommended to him as necessary
for visibility.
Director -Johnson stated she thought the request was very°reasonable.
DirectorcOrton:questioned whetherrthe.12-square-foot-size was necessary,
notingg:that others 'in the R-0 zoning distri'ct-are subject to size
restrictions. Director -Johnson noted:that all- a1'ong .the .highway :in
that area is C-2 zoned property, with other signs which are 12 square
feet in'size:
•
Director Hess stated .he did not think the request or the -size of:. the
sign to be unreasonable, noting that .the rationale for the variance,
wouldr:be to=allow: those :approaching the. office time to r see the sign
and t-o:tprepare."to turn-off sthe 'hightday.,': Hess :added that he .did not
think the petitioner was trying -to circumvent the intent ofthesign
ordinance.
Director Hess, seconded,.' bylMartin,•.made 'a .motion; to grant the variance
to install a 12 -square foot sign approximately five feet high. Upon
roll call, the motion passed,:6-0. . •
LOT.SPLIT/HWY.16W,.&,HWY,71
The Board considered a request by Len Edens for Board approval of
a fourth lot split, for property located at the southwest corner of
U I
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.9
January 7, 1986
Highway 16 West and Highway 71. The Mayor noted that the Planning
Commission would not review a request for a third lot split until
January 13, and he questioned whether the Board should consider this
request before'the.Planning Commission acts on the third lot split.
Director Orton made a motion that the Board take no action on the
request until the Planning Commission acts on the request for a third
lot split. There was no second to that motion.
Len Edens explained that he was requesting Board approval contingent
upon approval by the Planning Commission. Edens explained the reason
for making a request of the Board at this time is that he must post
a sign for thirty days and advertise in the newspaper for two weeks
before appearing before the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to request
a transfer on February 19. Edens explained that, if he cannot appear
before the ABC Board on February 19, he must wait until March 19 before
that Board meets again, which he stated would "mean a lot of money
out of my pocket".
Mayor Noland stressed that for the Board to take action on a fourth
split without any action by the Planning Commission on the third split
would be pre-empting the Planning Commission. Noland pointed out
that the Planning Commission's recommendation on the third split would
guide him in making a decision on the fourth split. Director Lancaster
agreed.
Director Martin stated he thought it important the Board not pre-empt
the Planning Commission but on the other hand he thought Edens' plans
did not pre-empt the subdivision regulations. The City Attorney noted
that, even if the lot split is approved, certain required improvements
can be imposed as a condition of lot split approval.
Edens explained that he owns all the property involved and that the
only reason he is splitting the property is to fulfill Alcoholic Beverage
Control requirements.
After further discussion, Mayor Noland suggested this request be placed
on the agenda of a special Board meeting already scheduled for January
14, one day after a Planning Commission meeting.
Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, lade a motion to table the request
until January 14. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
It was agreed that the Board would meet at 7:00 P.M. to consider this
request on January 14, prior to the joint City Board/Arts Center Board
meeting scheduled for 7:30 P.M.
1
WEDINGTON DRAINAGE„CONTRACT
January 7, 1986
The Mayor introduced a resolution authorizing the MayOt:and City Clerk
to execute a contract with Northwest Engineers, in the amount of $27.968.75
for design, plans, specifications andf'construction tainagement of the
Wedington area drainage project.
Director Orton, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to approve the
resolution. Upon roll Call, the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 2-86 APPEARS ON PAGE ::208... OF ORDINANCE &-RESOLUTION
BOOK ..XxII
611;71.4 -§1.1 -kat
.1 -kat
The Mayor noted there had been a request from Quapaw Oil & Gas, Inc.,
to witidrawtheir request' for approvals `of an '"oi-1 and gaSlease - to
allow drilling on a 40 -acre' tract of-+41and-on'4hich- 0.14 -acres of city
property is located. The Mayor explained the company had decided
they do -not wish. to drill at that„location.
AIRP,ORT.:SNOW. ,REMOVAL
The Mayor introduced a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute a'!renewal Of the • contract :with McClinton -Anchor; -Company
for snow: re>rioval at -Drake Field. The Mayor noted 'that the city, for
several' year, has entered into such a contract with this company;'
Director Johnson, seconded -by -Hess, made a motion to approve the reso-
lution.
esolution. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
•
RESOLUTION NOi'-3-86 'APPEARS :ANzPAGE” 216-OF=:ORDINANCE t&A<RESOLUTION
BOOK pgjx
AIRPORT. TERMINAL. SUBLEASE
The Mayor introduced a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute a three-year •Sublease between Air Midwest, the Sublessor,
and The Freight Connection, the Sublessee, for a portion of Air Midwest's
terminal -space; at $260. -per -month.•
Director ,Lancaster, -seconded by Johnson, madea motionto approve
the resolution.
In answer to a question from Director Johnson,.Airport.Manager. Dale
Frederick explained that The Freight Connection will make payments
directly to Air Midwest.
000
9:1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
U -U
January 7, 1986
10.1 In answer to a question from Director Martin, Frederick explained
that "terminal and cargo space" means space being leased in the extreme
southeast corner inside the terminal building.
10.2 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 4-86 APPEARS ON PAGE 218 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XXIII
AIRPORT PHONE LEASE
10.3 The Mayor introduced a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute a one-year lease with the Mountain Inn for direct airport-
hotel/motel telephone space at the Airport Terminal Building, at a
cost of $20 per month.
10.4 Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the
resolution. Upon roll Ball, the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 5-86 APPEARS ON PAGE 225 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XXIII
SLUDGE MANAGEMENT SITE DESIGN
10.5 The Board considered approval of additional engineering for the Sludge
Management site design, in connection with the city's Wastewater Treatment
Plant. The Mayor explained that CH2M Hill had provided an estimate
of $1700 for the required design changes to incorporate the recent
40 -acre land acquisition into the Sludge Management site design.
10.6 Director Lancaster, seconded by Orton, made a motion to authorize
the city to proceed with the additional engineering. Upon roll call,
the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 6-86 APPEARS ON PAGE 233 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XXIII
BELT FILTER PRESS AMENDMENT
10.7 The Mayor introduced a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute an amendment to a contract with CH2M Hill to incorporate
additional engineering for the belt filter press design, to reflect
changes and additions as a result of the city's original design review.
The Mayor explained this would result in a net contract addition of
$2,400 to the original $53,500 contract.
1
1
January 7, 1986
Director lancaster;''seconded by..Johnson', made' i' motion to- approve
the resolution.
In answer to a question from Director Johnson,City Engineer Don Bunn
explained this contract was separate from that which.. Was._.app.roved.
for additional engineering for the sludge management site design.
Upon roll ;call, the motion passed, 6=O.''
RESOLUTION NO. 7-86 APPEARS ON PAGE .. 235. OF ORDINANCE &.'RESOLUT.ION
BOOK .XXIII
ARCHEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION'
The Board considered approval of additional archeological investigation
at the Sliidge• Management site'.' 'The Mayor'' explained that''McCielland
Consultant -Engineers.; after discussions With Mid- Continental Research
Associates (the firm used ;for previous archeological investigations)
estimates the total cost of completing the work to be approximately
$12,000.:,.
Don Bunn noted that, depending on what.is found during theinvestigation,
there 'Could • be additional. expenditures.
Director Orton asked'if proposals had been sought from'severai'companies:
Bunn explained that Mid -Continental h'ad conducted the initial aieheolbgical-
survey for this project. •
Director Lancaster, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to approve
the request.
Director Orton asked for information regarding the qualifications
of Mid -Continental to perform the work. In answer to a question from
the City Attorney, Don Bunn stated the proposed contract..and:fee.'_s.tructur'e
had not already been approved by the E.P.A. The City Attorney asked
if the matter could be tabled for two weeks to investigate the -reasonable=
ness of'the fee, structure Burin agreed that this could be done.'-
Joe Tarvin, speaking for McClelland Engineers, explained that the
original proposal which was submitted in August was for $20,000.
Tarvin 'explained' that '-they had worked'with``the7'-proposer to `reduce
the scope'of •the`^ihvest gat fon 'dowri'ti approximately .";$10,000;;.F-Tarvin'
stated the other $2,000 would cover some survey work to lay out the
route of the sludge line.
In answer to questions from Director Orton, Tarvin stated that a qualified.
local archeologist would conduct the investigation.
Upon roll till, the motion passed, 6-0:
Old
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.6
11.7
11.8
11.9
11.10
vlr
January 7, 1986
RESOLUTION NO. 8-86 APPEARS ON PAGE 238 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XXIII
SEWER LINE CONDEMNATIONS
12.1 The Board considered a request from the City Engineer for authorization
of condemnation proceedings against seven tracts of land, in connection
with sewer line improvement right-of-way grants associated with the
new sewage disposal plant.
12.2 Don Bunn stated that property owner Cy Carney had initially indicated
he would settle for $3500, about twice the appraised value of his
property. Bunn explained that, after talking with Carney, it has
been discovered that it was understood by Carney that $3500 was for
only one of two tracts owned by him -- and that the figure Carney
is really willing to settle for is closer to $4200. Bunn stated it
is the staff's recommendation that the city initiate condemnation
proceedings in this case.
12.3 Director Lancaster, seconded by Hess, made a notion to authorize condem-
nation
ondernation proceedings as requested.
12.4 In answer to a question from the Mayor, the City Attorney explained
that he would file the case within two weeks but that it would not
be set for trial for a minimum of six months. McCord added that he
always tries to negotiate settlements in condemnation cases.
12.5 Upon roll call, the notion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 9-86 APPEARS ON PAGE 239 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XXIII
BID AWARD/READY-MIX CONCRETE
12.6 The Board considered the award of bid for the purchase of ready -mix
concrete for the calendar year 1986. The Mayor reported the staff
recommends the bid be awarded to the overall low bidder, Arkhola Sand
and Gravel Company.
12.7 Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, made a notion to award the bid
to Arkhola Sand and Gravel Company. Upon roll call, the motion passed,
6-0.
OTHER BUSINESS
12.8 The City Attorney explained that, in his absence at the last meeting,
three ordinances were read for the first time, the rules were suspended
January 7, 1986
in order to place the ordinances on their second and third readings:,'
and the titles of the oidinances were read for the second time, but
not for the':•third time. McCord noted this -..was a'possible procedural
defect whichshould be remedied.
REZONING :PETITION :R85-32/N.:GARLAND
The first ordinance was to rezone approximately five acres located
at 1170 North Garland Avenue, 'west:.of Garlandiand Mt:..Comfort between'
Wedington Drive and James Street.
Director Hess, seconded by Lancaster, made 'a motion to suspend the
rules and place the ordinance on third reading. Upon roll call, the
motion -.passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the
third time. Upon ion call, the ordinance passed, 6-0.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 3157 APPEARS ON PAGE 747D: OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK :.kk2II
REZONING PETITION R85-29/OLD FARMINGTON & SHILOH
The secondcordinahee_was:to-rezone .1.9.6.acies located at the southwest
cornerIof the intersection of.Old Farmington Road and Shiloh Drive.
Direetor_Johnson, seconded'by Hess, made a motion to'suspend the rules
and place the ordinance onf.third And. final',reading. Upon roll :call,
the motion passed; 6-O, :The -City Attorney read the 'ordinance for
the third time. Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 5-1, with Orton
voting:in the -.minority.
ORDINANCE:.NO.3158 'APPEARS ON PAGE .,_.481:. OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK X)SIII
CBID ANNEXATION;
The third ordinance was to annex property into the "Central Business
Improvement District #17. - -
Director Johnson, seconded by Hess, made a motion to suspend the rules
and place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call,
the motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for
the third time. Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 6-0.
ORDINANCE NO.. 3159 APPEARS ON PAGE 483 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XXIII
013
13.1
13.2
13.3
13.4
13.5
13.6
13.7
14.1
14.2
14.3
January 7, 1986
MINUTES
The minutes of the special Board meeting of December 13, 1985 were
approved as circulated.
The minutes of the December 17, 1985 Board meeting were approved with
the following correction:
408.5 "Farrator" should be "Ferritor"
The minutes of the special Board meeting of December 18, 1985 were
approved, with the following addition:
416.1 Add "after December 31, 1985" after "could not be done"
14.4 The minutes of the special Board meeting of December 24, 1985 were
approved as circulated.
14.5
14.6
14.7
REPORT FROM AIRPORT MANAGER
At Director Lancaster's request, Airport Manager Dale Frederick reported
the staff has met with Hazeltine Corporation and the FAA regarding
pre -survey site location for the construction of a microwave landing
system. In answer to a question from the Mayor, Frederick explained
that preliminary studies indicate the Airport will be able to attain
a 250 decision height, with 3/4 mile visibility, thus assuring an
arrival in bad weather, and a minimization of missed approaches.
Frederick reported that Congressman Hammerschmidt has announced that
the City of Fayetteville has been awarded $850,000 for expansion of
the terminal ramp, overlay of portions of the runway, and reconstruction
of portions of the taxiway.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at
about 9:08 P.M.
1