Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-08-07 Minutes154 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS A regular meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was held at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, August 7, 1984 in the Board Room of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. PRESENT: Assistant Mayor Lancaster; Directors Bumpass, Johnson, Orton and Sharp; City Manager Grimes; Assistant City Manager McWethy; City Attorney McCord; City Clerk Kennedy; members of the press and audience ABSENT: Mayor Noland; Director Martin CALL TO ORDER 154.1 Assistant Mayor Lancaster called the meeting to order, with five Directors present, and asked for a moment of respectful silence. EMPLOYEES OF THE MONTH 154.2 Lancaster announced the "employee of the month" awards for July, noting comments made about the outstanding performance of the employees by their supervisors. Certificates and checks for $150.00 were presented to Raymond E. "Todd" Bohannon, Water and Sewer Department; Darrell Lackey, Sanitation Department; and Daryl Mounce, City Shop. SANITATION CONTRACT 154.3 A resolution was introduced authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with Northwest Arkansas Waste Management which wishes to provide private collector service for American Air Filter. 154.4 City Attorney McCord explained this request is for a private collector contract authorized by city ordinance; that the request is being opposed by Sunray Sanitation which has a private collector contract to service American Air Filter and which also operates the landfill used by the city. McCord stated there is a dispute among counsel for each party concerning whether authorizing the contract would constitute a breach of the city's landfill contract with Sunray, and whether it would also be in violation of the city ordinance. McCord stated that Tom Hughes, Plant Manager for American Air Filter, has advised that an agreement has been reached with Sunray to continue sanitation service. McCord stated the issue appears to be moot and could be resolved by approving the request. 1 1 August 7, 1984 Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to approve the contract. Bill Clark, counsel for Harold Parsons of Northwest Arkansas Waste Management, addressed the Board, stating he appreciated the action to approve the contract but wished to address the broader issue. Clark stated the contract is actually a "license" rather than a contract because its wording allows Wase Management to negotiate. Clark gave (.0 the Directors copies of a resolution and contract approved by the Board for Sunray Sanitation in April of 1984, authorizing Sunray to negotiate with American Air Filter and other companies. Clark noted W paragraph one of that contract gives Sunray "...a non-exclusive right...". Clark asked the Board "to give us the same deal that you've given Sunray". Clark stated his client is "at a competitive disadvantage", Q as Sunray "has been given a blanket right" to deal with other companies. Lancaster noted the issue before the Board at this meeting is a contract with American Air Filter. William Jackson Butt, counsel for Sunray Sanitation, addressed the Board. Butt stated his client has no objection to the proposed ordinance "to do away with the city dumping ground". Butt stated he now realizes the ordinance does not apply to commercial and industrial waste. Butt stated if the city grants a contract to Parsons, Parsons can presumably use his own landfill. Butt noted points of concern to him: (1) when the contract was negotiated with the Sunray landfill there were no other competitors and it was understood "this was going to be the only landfill"; (2) if Parsons is granted a contract he has a competitive advantage over Sunray because he is not required to carry $2 1/2 million in liability insurance, is not required to post a $50,000 bond, nor has he agreed in writing to indemnify the city, as Sunray has been required to do; and (3) Sunray believes it has entered into an exclusive contract with the city and believes the city is bound to that. Butt urged the Board not to vote in favor of issuing a contract to Parsons. Director Bumpass asked the City Attorney to address the question of liability insurance and indemnification. McCord explained the city has two contracts with Sunray and the one for the landfill into which the city disposes its solid waste is the contract which contains an indemnification provision; that the city also has a private collector contract which authorizes Sunray to serve American Air Filter and other businesses and that contract has no such indemnification provision. McCord stated he could not foresee any potential liability to the city by authorizing a private collector contract; that the State regulates landfills very stringently. Director Bumpass asked what steps the city can take to assure that landfill permits are "current and up to date". McCord stated since landfills are regulated by the State the Board of Directors would become aware immediately if there are any problems or danger of revocation 155 155.1 155.2 155.3 155.4 155.5 156 August 7, 1984 156.1 of a permit 156.2 Lancaster asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on this item. There were no comments. 156.3 In answer to Director Johnson, City Manager Grimes clarified that both Parsons' and Sunray's vehicles had been inspected by the city. 156.4 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0, with Noland and Martin absent. RESOLUTION NO. 85-84 APPEARS ON PAGE /50 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK XIX AMENDMENT TO CODE/SANITATION LOCATION 156.5 An ordinance was introduced amending the City Code by deleting the requirement that private haulers deposit their garbage and trash at the City's disposal grounds. The City Attorney explained the existing ordinance is old and was written at the time the city operated its own disposal site; that repealing it would not preclude the city from enacting an ordinance (if the Resource Recovery facility becomes operable) requiring that all solid waste be disposed in that facility. 156.6 The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. The ordinance was read for the second time. Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. The ordinance was read for the third and final time. 156.7 Lancaster asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the ordinance. There was no response. Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 3021 APPEARS ON PAGE BOOK )(1,( INFORMATIONAL SIGNS OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION 156.8 An ordinance was introduced amending the City Code by allowing "identifi- cational and informational signs" to bear advertising. 1 1 1 August 7, 1984 The City Attorney explained the amendment was recommended by the city's Inspection Department and its purpose would be to enable the many existing identificational signs (which advertise the business) to continue in existence without becoming non -conforming and requiring removal. McCord stated there had been discussion regarding limitation on letter -sizing to differentiate between advertising and non -advertising but, according to a U.S. Supreme Court decision, any restriction on the size of lettering should apply to all lettering. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Sharp asked if the ordinance would limit the advertising (on the sign) to the business which is located on the property. The City Attorney suggested wording might be used to reflect that adver- tising is prohibited but identification of the business at that location is permitted. Director Johnson raised a question about an identificational sign, bearing the name of the business, located on a parking lot not owned by the business. Johnson also asked if there is a limitation on the number of signs which can say "customer parking". McCord noted the ordinance stipulates only one sign at each entrance and at each exit of a lot. The City Attorney suggested this item be tabled in light of the many questions which had been raised regarding the wording of the ordinance. The City Attorney recommended meeting with the Inspection Department to design a more comprehensive ordinance which would address all possible ramifications. Director Orton, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to table. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. FOURTH LOT SPLIT/BASSETT A request was introduced for a waiver of the literal requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, regarding the fourth lot split of a parcel located on the south side of Highway 16 West. Ronnie Woodruff was present, representing Airways Freight Corporation, which intends to purchase the 8 acre split. Woodruff explained that Airways Freight Corporation intends to build a national headquarters on the property now owned in trust by the heirs of Johnie Bassett. Woodruff explained the original tract encompassed 185 acres and the Planning Administrator has stated the property has been split three times. Woodruff stated the present owners have no interest in pursuing a subdivision in the near future. Woodruff stated the present zoning is A-1, Agricultural and the intention is to develop an office operation only, with no warehousing or freight terminal uses intended. 157 157.1 157.2 157.3 157.4 157.5 157.6 157.7 158 August 7, 1984 158.1 In answer to questions from Director Sharp, the City Attorney stated that a rezoning petition and a large scale development plan must be filed with the Planning Commission, at which time drainage and sewage problems would have to be addressed. 158.2 Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the lot split. 158.3 Director Sharp asked what factors the Board should be considering when considering approval of a fourth lot split. The City Attorney noted consideration should be given to whether the request is consistent with the spirit and intent of the subdivision regulations and whether there is intent to avoid platting requirements or to circumvent any regulations. 158.4 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. PROPERTY CLEANUP/620 S. LOCUST 158.5 An ordinance was introduced ordering the removal of an unsafe structure and the abatement of unsightly conditions on property located at 620 South Locust. 158.6 The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. The ordinance was read for the second time. Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. The ordinance was read for the third and final time. 158.7 Lancaster asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the ordinance. There was no response. Lancaster stated the Directors had viewed the location and Director Bumpass noted the property owners were notified. 158.8 Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 3022 APPEARS ON PAGE 017 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK ;iv EASEMENT CORRECTION/BIRCH AVENUE 158.9 An ordinance was introduced to correct the legal description of portion of Birch Avenue previously vacated and retained as a utility 1 1 1 159 August 7, 1984 easement. The City Attorney explained Ervan Wimberly had pointed 159.1 out the error. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. The ordinance was read for the second time. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. The ordinance was read for the third and final time. W m City Manager Grimes asked Wimberly if he had contacted utility companies Q and Wimberly stated he had done so previously. Grimes explained the original intention may have been to retain the entire 40 feet as an easement but only twenty feet is necessary. 1 1 Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 3023 APPEARS ON PAGE BOOK '/Y 21 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION TRAFFIC SIGNAL/N.COLLEGE & MEADOW INTERSECTION A resolution was introduced authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute a Highway Department permit agreement for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of North College Avenue and Meadow Street. Director Bumpass asked what effect this action would have on the current push-button stoplight at the Center Street intersection. City Manager Grimes explained the Meadow and Mountain Street intersections would be timed together so that pedestrians can cross. Director Bumpass brought up the concerns which have been expressed in the past by courthouse personnel about what effect the new light will have on pedestrian traffic. City Manager Grimes stated, since the County's construction plans are not yet finalized, adjustments can be made if they are found to be necessary. Director Orton, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to approve the reso- lution. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. RESOLUTION N0. 86-84 APPEARS ON PAGE /63 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK Y I X 159.2 159.3 159.4 159.5 159.6 160 August 7, 1984 AIRPORT COMMITEE REQUESTS 160.1 Lancaster introduced several requests from the Airport Committee meeting of July 31st. Lease Agreement/Caudle Freight 160.2 A request was introduced for approval of a lease agreement with Caudle Freight which reflects an increase of rent from $220 per month to $250 per month. 160.3 Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to approve the lease agreement with Caudle Freight. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 87-84 APPEARS ON PAGE /56 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK XU( Engineering Proposals/Obstruction Removal 160.4 A request was introduced for approval of the Airport Committee's recom- mendation to seek proposals from engineering firms to identify the scope of work involved in off -airport obstruction removal, as required by the Federal Aviation Administration and determine estimates for the project and complete an Airport Improvement Project application. 160.5 Dale Frederick, Airport Manager, noted this would be eligible for 90/10 match; that 50% of the city's match can be recouped from the State. Frederick explained the federal government has lowered the minimum visibility from one mile to 3/4 of a mile, which has changed the primary surface area (from 250 feet each side of the center line) to 500 feet each side of the center line, creating new obstructions. Frederick stated because it is not known how many obstructions there are or what they consist of, he recommends going through the selection process to obtain staff which can identify the scope of work and prepare an application. 160.6 Director Sharp, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to approve the recommendation of the Airport Committee. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. Airport Improvement Project/Terminal Ramp Expansion 160.7 A request was introduced for approval to submit an Airport Improvement Project application for terminal ramp expansion. 160.8 Frederick explained that, since the ramp was built in 1980, Scheduled Skyways and other airlines have greatly increased the size of their fleets, causing a need for expansion. 1 1 161 August 7, 1984 City Manager Grimes noted the airport receives several $100,000 per 161.1 year of 90/10 funds which are allocated from taxes paid by airline passengers. Director Johnson, seconded by Sharp, made a motion that the Airport Manager be given approval to submit an application for terminal ramp expansion. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. 161.2 Lease Agreement/Northwest Air LO A request was introduced for approval of a lease agreement with Northwest 161.3 W Air which is a renewal of an existing lease and does not reflect an m increase in rental. Q Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to approve the 161.4 lease agreement. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 88-84 APPEARS ON PAGE 1.5r47 OF ORDINANCE S RESOLUTION BOOK K ( X C/F/R Vehicle Dale Frederick explained there has been a change in C/F/R equipment for airports nationwide; that the district office has advised there be an update to the application (with a budgetary figure of $250,000). The City Manager recommended the city's purchasing officer, fire chief and shop superintendent review final specifications before pursuing competitive bids. Director Bumpass asked about the notation for an additional $25,000 for small tools. Frederick explained this would be separate from the $250,000 budgetary figure and would be included in a separate application. 161.5 161.6 161.7 Director Bumpass, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to upgrade the 161.8 application for fire equipment at the airport. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. Bid Award/Siding for Old White Hangar Building Lancaster explained four bids were submitted for siding the old white 161.9 hangar building, one of which was rejected because it was not bid according to specification. Director Sharp, seconded by Orton, made a motion to award the bid 161.10 to the low bidder, B & B Enterprises, for $18,355. 162 August 7, 1984 162.1 There was brief discussion concerning the problem of adjusting the budget because the bid amount is $5,355 over budget. City Attorney McCord noted this agenda item reflects a request for a budget adjustment. 162.2 In answer to questions from Directors, Purchasing Officer Mackey stated there is no time limit specified on how long the bid is good, but that a tine limit on completion of work would be specified in a contract. 162.3 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. ji SEWER LINES/VANDEVENTER AVENUE 162.4 A request was introduced for authorization of construction of sewer lines on Vandeventer Avenue and on Maple Street, at an estimated cost of $12,000, to replace certain private lines which have failed. Lancaster explained this is the recommendation of the Water and Sewer Committee which met on July 19th. 162.5 Director Orton noted discussion has taken place concerning budgeting funds in order to take care of other such private line replacement throughout the city. 162.6 Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the request. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-O. RESOLUTION NO. 97-84 APPEARS ON PAGE Me OF ORDINANCE 6 RESOLUTION BOOK )(IX SEWER LINES/FOX HUNTER ROAD 162.7 A request was introduced for authorization for construction of reinforce- ments to an existing sewer outfall line located on the south side of Highway 45 East, on Fox Hunter Road, at an estimated cost of $21,000; and a waiver of the Professional Selection Policy for the employment of an engineering firm for the project. Lancaster stated this is a recommendation of the Water and Sewer Committee. 162.8 Director Orton, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to approve the authorization. 162.9 Director Sharp questioned the lump sum amount of $500 for moving and replacing a rail fence, which was included in the estimated cost of the work submitted by McClelland Engineers. Engineer Johnny Quinn explained this amount was only an estimate and includes taking down the fence, moving it out of the way and replacing the fence. It was 1 August 7, 1984 the consensus of the directors that this lump sum amount was excessive. Quinn pointed out this job will be bid and if the work can be done more cheaply, it will be bid lower. 163 163.1 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. 163.2 RESOLUTION NO. 98-84 APPEARS ON PAGE 19 % OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK X I X N W BID AWARD 11592/POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT QConsideration was given to the award of Bid #592 for chlorine and ferric chloride for the Pollution Control Plant. 1 Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to award the bid to McKesson Chemical and Midland Resources, Inc. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. BID AWARD 11593/SEWER LIFT STATIONS Consideration was given to the award of Bid #593 for oxygen and vaporizers for odor control at selected sewer lift stations. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to award the bid to the Jimmie Jones Company. Upon roll call, the nation passed, 5-0. Director Bumpass asked why the bid prices were so different. Purchasing Officer Mackey stated he checked the bids out and the Jimmie Jones Company was found to be "in a much more competitive position". VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS Consideration was given to specifications for various vehicles to be advertised for bids. Director Lancaster asked if the specifications were written so that all three local motor companies would be able to submit bids for all items; and specifically if all the local motor companies sell a V-6 engine. Purchasing Officer Mackey replied that he was not sure but he thought that they could all meet the specifications. Director Johnson rade a motion that the specifications for various vehicles be advertised for bids. 163.3 163.4 163.5 163.6 163.7 163.8 163.9 163.10 164 164.1 164.2 169.3 169.4 169.5 164.6 169.7 August 7, 1984 Director Sharp asked why the specifications for Fire Department vehicles require cigarette lighters and push-button A.M. radios. Shop Superin- tendent Van Bell explained the cigarette lighters are used for other plug-in accessories used by the Fire Department. City Manager Grimes explained it has been found that the cost of the A.M. radios is recouped at auction. Mackey stated he thought the A.M. radios increase resale value of the auto. Mackey stated the inclusion of the lighters and radios is not intended to exclude any bidder and is a requirement which could be waived if it were to discourage a bidder. Director Bumpass asked for the range of prices received at the last auction for models of the same year. Mackey stated, depending upon condition and mileage, prices received ranged from $550 to $2600 for models of the same year. Director Lancaster asked if the proposed vehicle purchases would be replacements or additions. Mackey stated the vehicle for the Parks Department would be an addition to be used for the Horticulturist and is a budgeted item. City Manager Grimes stated all other vehicles would be replacements. Director Lancaster asked City Manager Grimes if he was satisfied with the specifications as they are. Grimes explained he had originally asked that the specifications be sent back for further review by the Purchasing Officer and Shop Superintendent because he had thought there were a lot of special items which he did not feel were necessary and he pointed out the specifications have been amended. the motion was seconded by Director Bumpass. After further discussion, City Manager Grimes asked Mackey to schedule a pre-bid conference. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS Quitclaim Deed/Lot 40, County Court Addition 164.8 The City Attorney requested that no action be taken regarding corres- pondence from Lamar Pettus as the legal descriptions involved are very confusing and Lamar Pettus is out of town. Children's House Site 164.9 Lancaster noted the Board of Directors had toured the Water and Sewer Operations Center as a possible Children's House site and agreed that it would be a good location. Director Sharp stated he would contact 1 N W m Q 165 August 7, 1984 the Community Development Director in regard to this and that no formal 165.1 action was necessary at this time. Fire -Rated Wire Glass Storm Windows Lancaster noted that no bids were received for the installation of 165.2 fire -rated wire glass storm windows and the recommendation is that the windows be built and installed in-house. City Manager Grimes suggested a sample window be constructed. Assistant City Manager McWethy stated a sample window could be constructed. He stated that, in checking with the Inspection Superintendent, what is proposed would meet the intent of the Code. McWethy, in answer to Director Bumpass, explained the intent of the Code is to protect the building should the adjacent KHOG building catch fire, since the windows on the second floor of the City building are just above the roof of the KHOG building. McWethy explained the heat from a fire could break out the city's present windows and cause flames to enter the city building; that wire glass gives a one-hour fire rating and keeps flames from entering the building. McWethy stated, according to the Inspection Department, wire glass windows should have been installed along the east side of the second floor. Director Bumpass questioned why no bids were received. McWethy suggested there may not be enough demand, perhaps because there are probably not many instances of new construction immediately adjacent to the roof of another structure. Director Bumpass asked about the cost of the project being McWethy stated the wire glass 1s readily available and frames can be constructed for less than $20 apiece, frames being needed. done in-house. estimated the with about 11 It was the consensus of the directors that it would be less to build and install the windows in-house. 165.3 165.4 expensive 165.5 Removal of Low -Water Dam City Manager Grimes referred to his memo to the Directors concerning 165.6 the removal of a city -owned low-water dam located on the West Fork of the White River. Grimes explained that this dam serves no useful purpose and actually constitutes somewhat of a nuisance during periods of high water flow when its presence encourages erosion along the west bank of the main river channel and through some adjacent property. Grimes recommended the adjacent property owner, Mr. Goff, be permitted to remove the low-water dam. Director Orton, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to approve the 165.7 recommendation of the City Manager and that the city wort with Mr. Goff on the removal of the dam. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. 166 Premium Tax on Health Insurance August 7, 1984 166.1 Lancaster made note, from information in the agenda, that the Governor's Task Force Subcommittee voted to impose a premium tax on all health insurance. It was the consensus of the directors to oppose this tax. 166.2 Director Orton, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to oppose the tax. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. Correspondence from Hinricks and Kovick 166.3 It was the consensus of the directors not to schedule as an agenda itme correspondence from Linda Hinricks and Michael Kovick regarding their proposal for an ordinance concerning sales of pornography. Request for Rehearing/"Chicken Country" 166.4 Lancaster stated that, in discussions with a representative of Chicken Country Restaurant, he was told there was an error in the request for a variance for a sign located at 1889 North College Avenue; that the petitioner states he was not notified that his appeal was on the agenda for July 17. Lancaster stated the petitioner requests a rehearing. 166.5 Lancaster, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to grant the request for a rehearing. 166.6 Director Bumpass stated the petitioner should submit a specific request and the petitioner should be notified of the date of the appeal. 166.7 Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. Utility Relocation/SWEPCO 166.8 City Manager Grimes stated $20,000 has been budgeted for SWEPCO to relocate utility lines on Dickson Street from West Avenue to Gregg Avenue. Grimes stated SWEPCO has submitted a payment request of $18,943.16 and Grimes recommended this payment be authorized before work is started. 166.9 Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to approve the request. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. Flyers on Dickson Street 166.10 Director Bumpass distributed a letter from Ray Jones, President of a merchants' group, "Pride In Dickson Street, Inc." Bumpass explained that, in an effort to eliminate the practice of posting flyers on buildings, lamp posts, etc., all along Dickson Street, a proposal has been made to construct and install ten 4' x 4' bulletin boards on Dickson Street. Bumpass stated in the past, the use of a "kiosk" was proposed but it was thought to be too costly. Bumpass stated 1 1 August 7, 1984 Jones wishes to address the Board regarding this proposal. Assistant City Manager McWethy stated, if the Board approves the use of the bulletin boards, he thinks it would be preferable if the city were to install and maintain them rather than the private sector, so that they can be kept well-maintained. Director Sharp suggested the possibility that one or two kiosks might be less expensive than ten bulletin boards. David McWethy was asked to obtain cost estimates for a kiosk. 167 167.1 167.2 167.3 After further discussion, Director Orton, seconded by Bumpass, made 167.4 a motion to place this item on the next agenda. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 5-0. MINUTES The Minutes of the regular meeting of July 17 were approved as circulated. 167.5 The following corrections and additions were made to the Minutes of 167.6 the special meeting of July 26: 148.8 "aspects of the vendor's contract that were," should read "aspects of the vendor's contract that were vague," 149.1 "requested by the Fayetteville" should by Fayetteville" read "requested "Miller said would was a good choice" should read "Miller said, was a good choice" 151.2 "Nest, Garrett asked" should read "Garrett asked" With those corrections and additions, the Minutes were approved as 167.7 circulated. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned 167.8 at 9:50 P.M.