HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-19 MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was held on
Tuesday, June 19, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. in the Board Room of the City
Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
PRESENT: Mayor Noland; Directors Bumpass, Johnson, Lancaster, Martin,
Orton and Sharp; City Manager Grimes; Assistant City Manager
McWethy; City Attorney McCord; City Clerk Kennedy; members
CO of the press and audience
10
CALL TO ORDER
W
CO Mayor Noland called the meeting to order and asked for a moment of
respectful silence.
1
ACT 9 BONDS/FAYETTEVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK WEST
Mayor Noland introduced an ordinance authorizing the issuance of $2,500,000
in Act 9 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds for financing the costs
of acquiring and improving the Fayetteville Industrial Park/West.
The City Attorney stated bond counsel advised him the required notice
of public hearing had not been published but recommended the Board
take action on the ordinance at this meeting; that the notice of public
hearing would be scheduled for the next Board meeting at which time
the Board can ratify any action taken at this time. McCord explained
this would allow the referendum period to begin running so the bond
sale could be closed in mid-July. McCord noted the Board has already
approved a memorandum of intent regarding this project.
The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director
Lancaster, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to suspend the rules
and place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 7-0. McCord read the ordinance for the second time. Director
Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to further suspend the
rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll
call, the motion passed, 7-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance
for the third and final time.
The Mayor explained there would be no liability on the part of the
city or its citizens for repayment of these bonds. The Mayor stated
the proposed project will produce additional employment opportunities;
the project would secure and develop industry; and the proposed project
should provide economic stimulation for the economy of the area.
101
101.1
101.2
101.3
101.4
102
June 19, 1984
102.1 Dale Christy was present to represent the Fayetteville Development
Foundation. In answer to questions from the Board, Christy stated
there are about 200 acres in the area to be developed for expansion
of the Industrial Park West. He stated the acreage has been partially
subdivided but at present they are preparing a complete replat of
the area to better utilize the property, which replat will go before
the Planning Commission next month. Christy stated there are clients
who will be interested in development after utilities are in place.
Christy stated parcels will range from one acre to 45 acres in size;
that the expansion area will bring the Industrial Park to a total
of about 800 acres.
102.2 The Mayor asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak against
the ordinance. There was no response. Upon roll call, the ordinance
passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 3015 APPEARS ON PAGE
BOOK Xi f(
ACT 9 BONDS/SCHEDULED SKYWAYS, INC.
8
OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
102.3 Mayor Noland introduced a resolution authorizing a Memorandum of Intent
regarding the issuance of $400,000 to finance construction of a new
aircraft maintenance hangar for Scheduled Skyways, Inc. The Mayor
stated there has been considerable discussion on this item; that approval
of this resolution would be the initial step towards consideration
.of an ordinance to issue the bonds. Director Lancaster stated the
Airport Committee recommends the passage of this resolution.
102.4 Director Johnson, seconded by Duwpass, made a motion to pass the reso-
lution. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 68-84 APPEARS ON PAGE
BOOK \(/,Y
SKYWAYS STORAGE AREA
88
OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
102.5 Mayor Noland introduced consideration of a request by Scheduled Skyways,
Inc. to construct a storage area adjacent to their existing aircraft
maintenance hangar.
102.6 Director Bumpass asked when the proposal on the lease of the existing
hangar would be presented to the Board for approval. Ede Hogue, Airport
Manager, stated the existing lease on the aircraft maintenance space
would expire in September and becomes renegotiable at that time.
Hogue stated she expected a new lease to come before the Board for
1
1
1
N
m
1
June 19, 1984
approval sometime between now and September.
Director Lancaster, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to approve
the request for the reason that it is a storage area for toxic and
flammable chemicals and will conform with the existing building.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
City Manager Don Grimes asked that the contractor check with the city's
Inspection Department, as there are very strict requirements regarding
the storage of such materials.
AIRPORT MANAGER'S OFFICE/REMODELING
Mayor Noland introduced consideration of a plan to remodel the Airport
Manager's Office, resulting in the conversion of 280 square feet of
floor space presently leased by Metro Airlines. The Mayor explained
this would reduce Metro's annual rental of exclusive space and that
Metro has agreed to this proposal.
Director Lancaster stated the Airport Committee recommends approval
of this proposal. Lancaster, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion for
approval. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
FAA FUNDING REQUEST
Mayor Noland introduced consideration of authorization to submit a
request to the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal year 1985
entitlement funds. The Mayor stated the Airport Committee has asked
that a priority list of other projects be established,' as set out
in the agenda.
Airport Manager Hogue stated priority item 1/2, "Taxiway lights on
taxiway to east side", should be included in the original application
for the taxiway extension and should be removed from the priority
list.
Director Lancaster stated this request is the recommendation of the
Airport Committee. Director Lancaster made a motion for approval.
Hogue explained that the airport is allowed a certain amount of entitlement
money annually, for development purposes, and that amount is calculated
based on the number of passengers boarding through the airport. Hogue
stated discretionary funds sometimes become available through the
FAA and, if there is an item on the priority list which the FAA feels
103
103.1
103.2
103.3
103.4
103.5
103.6
103.7
103.8
103.9
104
June 19, 1984
104.1 is needed, the FAA works with the city to see that it is accomplished.
Hogue stated the priority list "keeps us one step ahead".
Director Johnson seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the notion
passed, 7-0.
AIRPORT T -HANGARS
104.2 Mayor Noland introduced consideration of authorization to order the
second unit of T -hangars, containing space for 13 single aircraft
hangars to be constructed on the east side of the airport runway,
at the same price bid by Weinland, Inc. on September 22, 1983, including
the deduction for all interior partitions.
104.3 Director Lancaster explained these 13 hangars would be suitable for
single-engine aircraft and stated authorization is recommended by
the Airport Committee. Director Lancaster made a notion for approval.
104.4 Airport Manager Hogue explained this expense would be financed through
the bond issue which 1s presently financing construction of the executive
hangar.
104.5 Hogue pointed out, when T -hangars were bid in September, two separate
units were bid (a 10 -unit and a 13 -unit); that the bid being honored
by Weinland is the low bid for the 13 -unit hangar.
Director Buspass seconded the motion.
104.6 Hogue stated 9 out of the 10 present hangars have been rented and
there are several prospects for the rental of the remaining unit.
Upon roll call, the lotion passed, 7-0.
INTERIOR FIRE WALLS/AIRPORT
104.7 Mayor Noland introduced a request to authorize the Purchasing Officer
to advertise for competitive bids for the interior fire walls of the
aircraft hangars.
104.8 Airport Manager Hogue explained that, since the first ten units were
constructed, the State adopted a new fire code which requires aircraft
hangars of this particular size to have one-hour fire walls between
tenants Hogue stated four-hour fire walls are required for hangars
which exceed 10,000 square feet, to be located somewhere in the middle
of the hangar. Hogue stated sprinkler systems are required for hangars
exceeding 10,000 square feet. Hogue stated the interior walls, as
bid by Weinland, will have to be deleted, and fire walls installed.
1
1
CO
ID Mayor Noland announced that this would be the last Board meeting for 105.2
Ede Hogue because she has resigned from her position of Airport Manager.
W Director Lancaster, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion that the Mayor 105.3
in issue a commendation to Ede Hogue in recognition of her services to
Q the City of Fayetteville. Hogue stated she was looking forward to
continuing to work for the city in a part-time capacity.
June 19, 1984
Director Bumpass, seconded by Orton, made a motion to authorize the
Purchasing Officer to advertise for competitive bids for interior
fire walls. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
COMMENDATION/EDE HOGUE
105
105.1
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
GREEN SPACE ORDINANCE
Mayor Noland introduced an ordinance amending the city's Green Space
Ordinance, which the Mayor explained would add a sixth provision for
the granting of a waiver or variance -- that the proposed park areas
and recreational facilities are consistent with the Fayetteville Parks
Plan. The Mayor noted this amendment had been recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission.
The City Attorney stated he thought this added provision was implicit
in the original ordinance but its addition would remove any ambiguity.
McCord stated the amendment would also correct a typographical error
in the original ordinance.
The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Mayor Noland,
seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to suspend the rules and place
the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed,
7-0. McCord read the ordinance for the second time. Director Bumpass,
seconded by Johnson, made a motion to further suspend the rules and
place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call, the
motion passed, 7-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the
final time.
Director Orton asked how this amendment would change the present ordi-
nance. McCord stated the amendment would not change anything other
than to remove ambiguity. McCord stated questions had arisen in recent
months since waivers had been requested, as to what standards should
be applied; that the concept was implicit in the original ordinance
but just needed to be clarified. McCord said the fact that a developer
provides private recreational facilities does not necessarily mean
105.4
105.5
105.6
105.7
106
June 19, 1984
106.1 the developer is entitled to a total waiver.
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 7-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 3016 APPEARS ON PAGE 75 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK )(j,Y
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
106.2 Mayor Noland introduced consideration of authorization of preliminary
work in preparation for signalization of the intersection of Meadow
Street and College Avenue. The Mayor explained the Arkansas State
Highway and Transportation Department notified the City that it will
approve a traffic signal at the Meadow Street and College Avenue inter-
section (based on recent traffic counts on Meadow Street) providing
the existing signal at Center Street is removed.
106.3 Washington County Judge Charles Johnson addressed the Board. Judge
Johnson stated the County does not as yet know the exact location
for the new county jail. Johnson referred to earlier discussions
regarding the possible extension of Meadow Street east of College
Avenue, stating a traffic signal had been discussed at that time.
Judge Johnson noted there may be a great deal of construction activity
at the intersection should the new jail be located there.
106.4 City Manager Grimes stated the city's Traffic Superintendent would
meet in Little Rock with traffic engineers from the State Highway
Department to examine the location in relation to Center and Mountain
Streets, to devise the best possible arrangement so pedestrians can
still cross to the Courthouse.
106.5 Director Orton asked if the Board's actions are premature in light
of the pending location of the new county jail. City Manager Grimes
noted this action would simply authorize preliminary work; that the
Highway Department is proposing to strip off asphalt and resurface
that section of College Avenue, so for this reason any underground
work needed for the future signalization must be done before the resur-
facing work is done.
106.6 Judge Johnson stated the County has no objection to the plans for
signalization at the Meadow Street intersection but stressed the importance
of retaining the crossing to the Courthouse at Center Street and College.
106.7 Director Johnson asked about the cost of the proposed signalization.
Grimes stated, with labor provided by city crews, the cost of materials
should not exceed $4,000 to $5,000, an amount not presently included
in the budget.
1
1
1
June 19, 1984
Director Johnson, seconded by Surpass, made a motion to authorize
the preliminary work in preparation for signalization of the intersection
of Meadow Street and College Avenue. Upon roll call, the motion passed,
7-0.
W WILSON PARK GRANT
107
107.1
LO Mayor Noland introduced a request by the Parks and Recreation Department 107.2
for authorization to apply for a $50,000 Arkansas Department of Parks
W and Tourism grant, to be matched with $76,900 in city funds, in order
m to proceed with the development of the Master Plan for Wilson Park.
a The Mayor noted the grant application deadline is June 29.
Director Bumpass asked if funds were budgeted for this development 107.3
and Grimes explained this project would come under the 1985 budget.
1
Director Orton asked if the city funds would come from the Parks and 107.4
Recreation Department's share of the one cent sales tax. Mayor Noland
stated that this would be the case.
Director Johnson, referring to the list of grant projects, stated
she did not see "relighting the ballfield underground" on the list
of 1984-1985 projects. City Manager Grimes explained underground
wiring is a requirement for receiving federal matching funds.
Director Lancaster, seconded by Martin, made a motion to approve the
request. Mayor Noland stated this request has been recommended for
approval by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Upon roll call,
the motion passed, 6-1, with Director Johnson voting against the motion.
RESOLUTION N0. 69-84 APPEARS ON PAGE 91p OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK X J vG
CH2M HILL ENGINEERING CONTRACT
Mayor Noland introduced consideration of authorizing the execution
of Amendment Number Two to Task Order Number One of the CH2M Hill
engineering services contract. Dr. Cliff Thompson was present to
represent CH2M Hill.
The Mayor explained this amendment would provide for an archeological
survey, a study of alternative disinfectants, revisions to allow project
phasing, redesign to include the selected disinfection process and
redesign to add a new equipment storage building and to modify the
laboratory.
107.5
107.6
107.7
107.8
108
June 19, 1984
108.1 Dr. Thompson explained the requirement to study alternative disinfectants
to eliminate chlorine residual problems was imposed because of a concern
of chlorine toxicity to certain species of fish. Thompson stated
they have been asked to prepare an assessment of cost for a dechlorination
system; that they estimate the cost could be as much as $1 1/2 million.
Thompson stated the alternative methods of disinfection have lower
capital costs but have higher operating costs. Thompson stated that
the alternative uses of ozone or ultra -violet radiation are recommended
by the EPA but stated he did not know of a system this large ever
using those alternative methods. Thompson stated a decision will
be made by the end of next week as to the lowest cost alternative.
108.2 Thompson stated the EPA has agreed to allow project phasing as a compromise
to building the treatment plant as two separate construction projects,
which phasing will reduce the cost of the project. Thompson stated
EPA is requiring that three separate grant applications be submitted,
one for each fiscal year.
108.3 Thompson stated they have been negotiating since early April with
DPCE regarding the construction management contract and have finally
reached total agreement. Thompson stated they have reduced the project
manager role by 80 days; reduced the lead engineer role by 50 days;
and reduced the contract amount by about $92,000.00.
108.4 Mayor Noland stated he found it a disturbing fact that, although it
had been known from the very beginning that chlorination was proposed
to be used, it was not until the very last stages that the dechlorination
alternative was raised. Thompson explained that the EPA has different
review groups and apparently the latest review team has recommended
dechlorination in 90% of their reviews. Thompson stated this requirement
has only been imposed by the EPA in the last six or eight months.
108.5 Director Sharp noted the not -to -exceed cost is raised from $26,000
to $91,000, but compensation for the redesign of the disinfection
system is not included in this figure. Thompson stated the cost of
construction, in the worst case, could be as much as $1 1/2 million;
that the engineering cost would be 6%, or $90,000 to $100,000.
108.6 Director Johnson asked how much under budget was the $21,073 figure
for "interim improvement". Thompson stated that figure was about
$22,000 under budget.
108.7 Director Johnson, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the
amendment to the engineering contract. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 7-0.
RESOLUTION N0. 73-84 APPEARS ON PAGE
BOOK x(X
LI 0
OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
1
1
N
W
co
Q
June 19, 1984
POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT/PHASING PLAN
Mayor Noland introduced a resolution expressing City of Fayetteville
approval of the phasing plan for construction of the Pollution Control
Plant and system modifications and expansion.
109
109.1
Director Bumpass, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the 109.2
resolution. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
RESOLUTION NO. REPEALED BY RESOLUTION NO. 71-84, PASSED 7-3-84
POLLUTION CONTROL PLANT/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Mayor Noland introduced discussion as to whether or not a third -party
construction manager should be retained to oversee the construction
of the Pollution Control Plant facilities. The Mayor explained the
EPA has asked the city to consider this item. Noland stated, after
conversation with EPA officials, he thought it was the recommendation
of the majority of the Directors that, if the decision is made to
hire such a manager, it should be initiated "almost immediately" so
this person can become involved in the early stages of the project.
The Mayor noted this was a recommendation from the EPA, not a requirement.
Director Orton asked if such management could be undertaken by the
City Engineer or some other in-house person. City Manager Grimes
stated there is not a city employee with sufficient experience in
management of such large, complex construction.
Director Lancaster made a notion that the City Manager be authorized
to proceed with the hiring of a third -party construction manager.
Director Bumpass seconded the motion, after Director Lancaster confirmed
that the intent of his motion was to send out "requests for qualifica-
tions".
Director Bumpass stressed the importance of identifying the parameters
of the position and of deciding what role the manager will have, as
this position relates to the engineer and the contractor. Bumpass
stated he did not think the Board would want to allow "broad discretion
in re -designing any part of the plant", that it is critical to hire
someone who will work in the best interests of the city and who will
not be an obstacle to progress.
Director Johnson stated she thought a reason for hiring such a manager
should be because of "some deficit in the quality of work that has
been performed so far", something she stated she has not seen with
CH2M Hill.
109.3
109.4
109.5
109.6
109.7
110
June 19, 1984
110.1 Director Lancaster stated that his motion was not meant as any reflection
on the quality of the services CH2M Hill has provided but the intent
of the motion is to hire someone to represent the best interests of
the city.
110.2 Mayor Noland stated the Board still has the right not to hire a manager.
110.3 Director Sharp stated he did not think there was sufficient information
on hand as to the experience of other cities with similar treatment
plant projects, noting only two letters had been received from other
cities. Sharp asked that the City Manager talk with at least six
cities which have built equivalent plants.
110.4 Director Martin noted the arbitration role of the project manager
is an important role but asked if this position would be a duplication
of the existing manager position.
110.5 Mayor Noland stated the EPA promised to send guidelines on how other
cities have used this position.
110.6 Cliff Thompson stated that CH2M Hill sees the need for extensive involve-
ment by a qualified person representing the city to be available 100%
of the time for some of the time and at least 50% of the time over
a four-week period. Thompson stated they would prefer to recommend
change orders (upon request of the contractor) for review by the city
rather than directly reviewing the change orders. Thompson stated
CH2M Hill's contract presently provides for a construction manager
and they would have concerns if a construction management firm were
hired to oversee CH2M Hill's work because this would take away their
responsibilities. Thompson pointed out that CH2M Hill must begin
providing services in two or three weeks.
110.7 Director Martin suggested the Board might ask Dr. Thompson for his
views on the role of the proposed third -party construction manager.
110.8 Director Bumpass asked if the EPA or the State plays any role in approving
that construction is meeting the design criteria and specifications.
Thompson stated EPA and the State have said they do not have the manpower
to give the project attention and "they don't want any problems".
110.9 Thompson stated there has been a change in the contract executed two
months ago in that the amount is less than the amount approved at
that time. Thompson also stated, if the city should decide on "a
total C.M. approach" for the role of the project manager, the contract
would have to be modified. It was decided to delay action on the
reduced contract amount until the July 3rd Board meeting.
110.10 City Engineer Don Bunn stated he agreed that, at some point, the city
will need a person who can spend at least 50% of their time being
directly involved with this project. Bunn stated he was not sure
1
June 19, 1984
that a "full scale construction management approach" is desirable
for this project. Bunn stated he did not think it was possible to
hire anyone at this point who could become familiar with what progress
has been made thus far, who would have the ability to make construction
management decisions.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0, with Director Johnson stating
she was voting for the motion "if this is for an in-house review"
ID City Manager Grimes stated there needs to be an outline of the project
manager's duties and responsibilities, for approval by the Board,
W the EPA and the DPCE. Grimes stated he thought it was agreed that
CO a project manager is not wanted who would review plans and specifications
a or recommend changes. Grimes stated a draft would be prepared and
sent to the Board for review.
Director Martin urged Dr. Thompson to provide his input on the role
of the project manager as soon as possible, for the Board to consider
in drawing up their criteria.
Director Bumpass expressed concerns about the proposed project manager
"being the highest paid city employee" and stated he thought the line
of authority should be established, as to how this position should
"interface" with the Board, with the City Manager, with the engineer
and the contractor.
OTHER BUSINESS
Remote Shop Equipment Requirements/Budget Adjustment
•
Mayor Noland introduced consideration of a budget adjustment for $6,077.86
to allow the purchase of tools and equipment required to operate a
remote shop in the city facility on Church Street.
Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a notion to adjust the
budget to reflect the expenditures for the remote shop. Upon roll
call, the motion passed, 7-0. n
RESOLUTION NO. 69-A-84 APPEARS ON PAGE 9 7 OF RESOLUTION BOOK sax.
Sidewalk Waiver Request/Wedington Road
Mayor Noland introduced consideration of a request for a sidewalk
waiver, in conjunction with the Woodland Hills Condominiums development.
City Manager Grimes suggested a Street Committee meeting be scheduled
to consider this item. The Street Committee meeting was scheduled
for Friday, June 29 at 1:00 P.M.
111
111.2
111.3
111.4
111.5
111.6
111.7
111.8
111.9
112
Board Room Platform
June 19, 1984
112.1 Director Lancaster, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to authorise
the City Manager to proceed immediately to correct the platform in
the Board Room, by moving it forward to allow more room around the
tables. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
112.2 Director Lancaster made a request that the City Board be furnished
a copy of all uncompleted items and all items not in working order
in the City Administration Building.
Sherwood v. City of Fayetteville
112.3 Director Sharp referred to a May 1, 1984 letter written by City Attorney
McCord regarding a complaint filed against the City of Fayetteville
by William Sherwood concerning the Planning Commission's decision
to deny an application for a conditional use for property located
on Highway 16 West. Director Sharp questioned whether this would
have been a "use by right" in the A-1 zoning district.
112.4 City Attorney McCord stated his letter asked for instruction by the
Board of Directors on whether to defend the lawsuit or to agree to
a consent degree authorizing the requested change in use; that because
he has not been instructed to agree to a consent decree, he assumes
the case is to be defended.
Donrey Communications Lawsuit
112.5 Director Lancaster, referring to the Donrey Communications lawsuit,
made a motion that if the injunction is not granted, the City Manager
be authorized to proceed with removing the Donrey signs in whatever
manner he sees fit. The motion was seconded by Director Orton.
112.6 Director Martin stated he would prefer to rely on the legal system
to get the signs down, as opposed to city employees spending their
time removing the signs.
112.7 The City Attorney stated, if the federal court does not enjoin the
city from enforcing the ordinance, the city has two recourses. McCord
stated the Chancery Court decree ordered Donrey to remove the signs
within 180 days, which time limit has expired. McCord stated the
city can file a petition for a contempt citation in Chancery Court
and seek appropriate sanctions as determined by the Court (payment
of fine or authorization for the city to remove the signs at Donrey's
cost). McCord stated there is precedent for the city to summarily
remove the signs after the litigation process has been completed and
the property owner has not voluntarily complied (that precedent being
the Osage Oil sign).
1
113
June 19, 1984
Director Sharp suggested an amendment to the motion, that at the same 113.1
time the city seek a contempt citation.
Director Bumpass asked the City Attorney if a bond could be placed 113.2
upon the owners, and what amount he would suggest. The City Attorney
stated Donrey has estimated the cost of removal of all signs to be
$37,000. The City Attorney stated the risk to the city, of pursuing
removal without a court order, is the possibility of the city being
unable to recover its costs.
Director Sharp, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to amend Director 113.3
W Lancaster's motion to add that the Board also requests the City Attorney
m to seek a contempt citation. Upon roll call, the amendment passed,
Q 7-0. Upon roll call, Director Lancaster's amended motion passed,
5-2, with Directors Martin and Noland voting against the motion.
City -Wide Auction
Director Johnson announced that a city-wide auction will be held on 113.4
June 30 at 9:30 A.M.
Office Furnishings for City Attorney
City Manager Grimes stated that the City Attorney wishes to relocate
his offices to the City Administration building and that the Interior
Design Consultant has estimated the cost of furnishing this office
area to be $5,410 (including desk, credenza, three book shelves and
chairs). Grimes stated these items can be supplied by July 1st if
approved by the Board.
113.5
Director Sharp, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to approve this 113.6
expense. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 7-0.
MINUTES
The following corrections and additions were made to the Minutes of 113.7
the June 5 meeting:
86.5 Insert between 86.5 and 86.6: "Director Orton, seconded
by Martin, made a motion to grant the variance with
the condition that the recreational facilities will
be in place before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
After further discussion, Director Bumpass made a motion
to amend Director Orton's motion to add a requirement
for a contribution of $40.00 per unit. There was no
second to that motion."
113.8
114
June 19, 1984
114.1 90.8 "...and recommends a proposed wage and salary study
be done..." should be changed to read "...and in accordance
with the professional selection policy, recommends
a proposed wage and salary study be done..."
114.2
114.3
114.4
91.4 "...how much raises employees should be given..." should
be changed to read "...employee raises..."
94.7 Add "After brief discussion..." before "Director Orton
stated..."
With those corrections and additions, the Minutes of the June 5 meeting
were approved as distributed.
ADJOURNMENT
114.5 With no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:55 P.M.
1
1