HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-02-07 Minutes2.3U
MINUTES OF A BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
A meeting of the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville was
held at 7:30 P.M. an February 7, 1984 in Room 107, Continuing Education
Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
PRESENT: Directors Lancaster, Osborne, Sharp, Bumpass, Orton and
Johnson; Assistant City Manager McWethy; City Attorney
McCord; City Clerk Kennedy; members of the press and
audience
ABSENT Mayor Noland
CALL TO ORDER
In the absence of Mayor Noland, Assistant Mayor Osborne called the
meeting to order and asked for a moment of respectful silence.
EMPLOYEES OF THE MONTH
295.1 Director Osborne presented employees of the month for January, 1984
—Ben Jamerson, Transmission & Distribution Supervisor, and Ina McElroy,
Clerk III-- with a certificate and a check for $150 and noted the
comments made about the outstanding performance of the two employees
by their supervisors. Dennis Mullens, Fire Department Captain, also
chosen as employee of the month, was not present.
RESIGNATION OF DAVID HAUSAM
295.2 Osborne announced that David Hausam, Assistant Finance Director, has
been selected by the City of Bentonville as their City Controller,
and will be leaving the City of Fayetteville after 14 years of employment.
Osborne noted that Hausam had been Business Office Manager, Special
Projects Manager, Accounting Supervisor and Assistant Finance Director;
that he had been one of the original founders of the Fayetteville
City Employees' Credit Union. Osborne expressed best wishes to David
Hausam, stating that his abilities will be severely missed by the
staff and Directors.
WELCOME TO PATRICIA MAY/"SPRINGDALE NEWS"
295.3 Osborne noted the presence of Patricia May, representing The Springdale
News, replacing Scott Van Laningham who has moved to Little Rock.
1
1
1
2-7-84
TEEN TOWN
Osborne introduced a request by representatives of "Teen Town" for
an opportunity to acquaint the Board with, and seek the City's support
of, the concept of a Teen Center. Lamar Pettus was present to represent
"Teen Town".
•
Pettus introduced Ruben Baltz, President of Teen Town Board of Directors,
Vice -President Mary Larson, Secretary Barbara Jo Griffis, Treasurer
Donna Pettus and Public Relations Officei Troy Hendricks. Pettus
explained that "Teen Town" began in August of 1983 and that they are
a non-profit organization 'presently seeking tax exempt status from
the State of Arkansas. 'He stated they have received endorsements
from Senator Henry, Congressman Hammerschmidt, and school representatives
in the community. Pettus stated there are many Teen Towns across
the state. He stressed the Center's purpose would be to provide drug
and alcohol -free after-school entertainment'and recreation for high
school' students from grades 9 through '12. Pettus noted that "Teen
Town" would be operated and controlled'by-an adult Board"of Directors,
with a junior Board consisting of representatives from the high schools
and junior high 'schools who would also be the' program planning -committee.
Pettus stated also they have made nine requests for financial support
and request that the City Board endorse their concept. Pettus stated
one of their gbals is to' built their own facility in one to two years
but to, in the meantime; utilize space at the Youth Centel. -Pettus
stated "Teen Town" would not compete with the Youth Center, which
does not provide entertainment and 'whose activities are oriented to
all age groups, but would complement the Youth Center. 'He stated
also they were applying for' a $6600 grant from the State of Arkansas
to help 'develop the initial'sfages.'
At Director'Sharp's'sugestion,•it was decided-Pettius should contact
Dale Clark of the Parks and Recreation'Committee; and'request• that
"Teen Town" be placed on the agenda of that committee's annual meeting
which is scheduled to be held within a week.
•
1984 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET
Osborne introduced consideration of the 1984 Community Development
Block Grant Budget. Osborne explained a public hearing had been held
by the Board at its January 17; 1984 meeting and that the Board Finance
Committee has met and will present a recommendation.
Director 'Johnson presented, and made a motion to adopt; a funding
proposal as follows:
Housing Rehabilitation
Lytton Avenue improvements
EOA Weatherization
Bailey Drive improvements
$100,000
44,000
3,500
20,000
296
296.1
296.2
296.3
296.4
296.5
296.6
23,
2-7-84
297.1 Blair Avenue improvements
Utility relocation for:
Blair Avenue
Mashburn Avenue
Lytton Avenue
Butterfield Trail improvements
Mashburn Avenue improvements
SCAN/Children's House
50,500
20,000
25,000
80,400
50,000
Reduce Contingency Amount To: 14,301
297.2 Director Orton asked if the intent of the proposal would be to fund
Children's House again next year for an additional $50,000. Director
Sharp explained the amount of funding proposed for SCAN/Children's
House next year may not be as much as $50,000 because the amount of
space needed, the cost of bringing utilities to the site, and other
unknown factors, has led the Board to propose less than total funding.
Sharp also noted, if an existing building could be found, the total
amount of funding requested might not be needed.
297.3 Director Johnson stated she thought the sentiment of the committee
was to have Children's House and SCAN present a proposal, giving reasons
why both programs should be in the same facility, information regarding
their plan for future operation, how the building would be furnished,
their ability to provide maintenance conditions such as heating and
air-conditioning, their ability to make utility payments, and their
ability to secure a reliable and consistent source of funding for
future years. Johnson also recommended that land at the intersection
of Razorback Road and Highway 62 be considered as a possible building
site. Osborne explained, before final City funding be committed to
these projects, the Board wishes to have the additional information
submitted in writing. Osborne also stated Bill Mandrell, Director
of "The New School", has volunteered to assist in the design of a
building and has recommended a metal building would maximize available
space.
297.4 Director Lancaster stated he did not think the present Board should
pledge additional funding out of next year's revenue because there
could be a different Board next year. Lancaster also stated he wished
to know what other communities (receiving SCAN/Children's House services)
besides Fayetteville would be contributing towards the programs' oper-
ations, stating he did not think the City could legally use CD moneys
for the benefit of non -Fayetteville citizens. Director Sharp pointed
out those two programs also receive funding from the Washington County
Quorum Court and the Springdale and Fayetteville United Fund and he
stated he thought funding these programs was an appropriate use of
CD funds.
1
1
1
2-7-84
Director Sharp seconded Director Johnson's motion to adopt the proposed
CD funding budget. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0, with Mayor
Noland absent:.
RESOLUTION NO. 15-84 APPEARS -ON PAGE /91 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XVII 1
Director Osborne noted there were other deserving projects which will
not receive funding in 1984, and stated Fayetteville Open Channel
had a good proposal. Director Sharp pointed out it took 7 or 8 years
-for the: Lytton/Mashburn/Blair projects tolfinal1ycreceiverfunding‘
CODE OF CONDUCT
Osborne introduced consideration of a Code of Conduct•which lists,
to avoid conflict-of-interest situations,:specifically prohibited
acts by City employees or contractors.
Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made.a motion-to'approve the
proposed Code of Conduct. • •11 1
Director Osborne questioned wording on•page 1, under Number 1, where
it states "No employee...shall participate in selection...of a contract
supported by Federal funds...". Osborne thought the Code of Conduct
should -prohibit engaging•in these practices, whether federally funded
or not. Osborne suggested the elimination•of the wording "supported
by Federal funds". Osborne also questioned the wording where certain
practices- are. prohibited for "former employees"'stating this could
not.possibly•be enforced.
Director Orton, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to insert "or any
funds" after the wording "supported by Federal funds...". Directors
Johnson and Bumpass agreed to the amended motion. Upon roll call,
the motion passed, 6-0. •
RESOLUTION NO.. 16-8.4•APPEARS' ON PAGE YQJ•, l OF ORDINANCE' &4RESOLUTION
BOOK you
PROPERTY LIEN
Osborne introduced an ordinance authorizing the filing of a lien against
a parcel -for which a clean-up payment has not been received.
City Attorney McCord stated he had. visited with • the property owner,
feels it is likely the bill will be• paid, and recommended this item
be tabled. Director Bumpass, seconded by Orton, made a motion to
table the item. Upon roll call, the motion. passed, 6-0.•
298,
298.1
298.2
298.3
298.4
298.5
298.6
298.7
298.8
29�
2-7-84
REZONING APPEAL R83-15
299.1 Osborne introduced an appeal of a decision by the Planning Commission
to deny Rezoning Petition R83-15, for rezoning from R-1 (Low Density
Residential) to R-0 (Residential -Office), for 0.86 acres located in
the middle of the block between Rebecca and Davidson Streets and Willow
and College Avenues. Petitioner Carlon Bassett and his attorney were
present to represent the appeal.
299.2 Carlon Bassett stated he is presenting this appeal on behalf of the
property owner, Johnie Bassett. Bassett remarked that the background
history on this issue has been controversial and he only wished to
note that regardless of what has happened in the past, the only relevant
issue should be to determine the future use of the property. Bassett
expressed the opinion that, if the property should remain R-1, future
residential development would entail tree removal for bridges and
roadwork, utilities and general construction. Bassett asked that
the rezoning be granted with the proposed Bill of Assurance.
299.3 Director Lancaster asked the City Attorney about the status of litigation
regarding the use of the property as a parking lot. McCord explained
the issue addressed in the pending litigation was whether the property
owner was in violation of the zoning ordinance by permitting the property
to be used as a parking lot; that the Chancery Court ruled the property
owner was in violation and the issue is presently on appeal. McCord
stated regardless of the outcome of this litigation, if the rezoning
were granted it would authorize the use of the property for parking,
subject to the Bill of Assurance which has been offered.
299.4 Truman Yancey addressed the Board on behalf of a group of residents
in the vicinity of the property in question. Yancey made note of
the actions of the Planning Commission, the petitions submitted in
opposition to the appeal from area residents, from the Washington -
Willow Historic District Commission, and from the Washington County
Historic Society. Yancey stated the original zoning drew a line between
the commercial and the residential areas and he suggested there have
been no significant changes in the character of the area. Yancey
stated he believed it was the Board's policy to allow commercial expansion
at major intersections and not to "strip expand" along the highway
corridors, and that the Board's general policy has also been to protect
residential areas. Yancey commented on the three recommendations
of Planning Consultant Larry Wood. As to recommendation (1), Yancey
stated rezoning with a Bill of Assurance merely delays a decision
to rezone. As to recommendation (2), Yancey stated rezoning to R-0
in this instance would not provide a buffer zone but would be an expansion
of a commercial activity. He stated also that a parking lot would
not be in support of an adjacent R-0 use. In response to recommendation
(3), Yancey stated there are acceptable techniques which allow the
flood plain areas to be used within limits.
299.5 Director Orton stated the parking problem has been created as a result
of the business which has nighttime parking, and noted that when the
1
1
2-7-84
business began, it did so with the knowledge that limited parking
was available. Orton stated she did not think the commercial use
should be further extended into the residential area. •
- ..
,1
Director Johnson stated if the Board does not approve the rezoning,
"Norma Jean's" is not going to go away and would still operate until
2:00 A.M.
Director Sharp stated it was brought out in the public hearing at
the Planning Commission meeting that additional parking would only
increase the problem (the intrusion into the residential district).
Sharp noted also that Barbara Crook's motion to.deny included two
points: that (1),this was an intrusion into the Historic District
and,(2) a parking lot used primarily atinight would be an unsatisfactory
intrusion because of noise and lights. Sharp noted also that Commissioner
Gitelman noted some problems; in -the wording of the Bill of Assurance
offered. Director Sharp, seconded by Orton,. made a motion to uphold
the unanimous decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal.
Attorney for the owner addressed the Board and expressed his willingness
to have the City Attorney draft an acceptable Bill of Assurance, stating
he. did not think it fair to oppose the -appeal •on.the• basis of poor
draftsmanship,. -Sharp stated he did not base his decision on Commissioner
Gitelman's views regarding the Bill of Assurance. 1
Director.Osborne.stated he thought,the fact that the club "is not
going to go..away" is -a pertinent issue in the Board's consideration.
Osborne stated.also that the Boar -d represents the patrons of the club
as well as the residents.of,the Historic District; that rezoning to
R -O withian enforceable Bi11-of.Assurance might be better than R-1
zoning.because R-1 uses could allow 'the owners to clear the land and
'.'devastate the north end of the Washington -Willow. Historic District".
Osborne stated he thinks a compromise might be struck which could
be satisfactory.to both parties. _
Director Bumpass asked the City Attorney about the nature of the pending
appeal regarding the parking lot. City Attorney McCord explained
the City filed an action for a permanent injunction to enjoin the
use of the property as a parking lot; the Chancery Court granted a
decree which the property owner, superceded and appealed to the Court
of:Appeals. ,McCord stated, assuming theidecree is affirmed, the enforce-
ment•mechanism wouldbe a contempt.citation.against the property •owner
for violating the permanent injunctionorprosecution in Municipal
Court, each day of violation being a separate offense subject to a
fine of up to $250 a day. McCord pointed out the rezoning appeal
is a separate issue from the.pending litigation, that if the Board
chooses to deny the appeal, the property owner has a recourse to challenge
that decision in Chancery Court.
Upon roll call, the motion to uphold the decision of the Planning
Commission and deny the appeal was passed, 4-2, with Directors Johnson
and Osborne voting against the appeal.
3 GO
300.1
300.2
300.3
300.4
300.5
300.6
300.7
301
2-7-84
SIGN APPEAL/FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS, HERITAGE DIVISION/20I N. EAST AVE.
301.1 Osborne introduced an appeal from the literal provisions of the Sign
Ordinance submitted by First Federal Savings of Arkansas, Heritage
Division, 201 North East Avenue. Attorney Tom Burke was present to
represent the appeal.
301.2 Mr. Burke addressed the Board, stating the petitioner requests permission
to erect a 22 square foot free-standing sign at a six foot setback
from street right-of-way. Burke stated the sign would measure 2.75
x 8 feet. He explained the purpose of the sign would be educate customers
about the automatic teller machine recently installed in the front
of the building. He pointed out a variance had been approved directly
across the street for a free-standing sign in front of a law office.
301.3 Director Lancaster asked if it was necessary for the sign to be as
large as proposed. Burke stated the sign size was chosen as part
of a standard marketing technique of the Association. Burke noted
that, in comparison to the sign across the street, he thinks the Associ-
ation's sign would be smaller in relation to the size of their building.
Director Lancaster asked why this Association needs such a sign, when
First National and Mcllroy Banks do not. Burke replied the Association
perceived the sign to be a service to their customers, as part of
the Association's competitive position in the market.
301.4 Director Sharp asked Sign Inspector Bert Rakes about the size of the
free standing signs in the near area for which variances were granted.
Rakes stated the law office sign is about six square feet and the
sign for what used to be "The China Hutch" is about three to four
square feet. Rakes said the law office sign is set back nine feet
from the Spring Street right-of-way and 7 1/2 feet from the North
East Avenue right-of-way. Sharp stated he thought the same consideration
which was given to the other requests, as to size, should be given
to this request. Sharp also pointed out the Association already has
an extremely large identification sign on the face of the building.
Director Bumpass asked how large the sign would be on the teller machine
itself. Director Osborne stated that sign would be about eight square
inches.
301.5 Director Orton, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to grant a variance
for a sign no larger than six square feet and set back nine feet from
the street right-of-way. Bert Rakes noted the building was located
9 1/2 feet from the right-of-way. Mr. Burke stated he wished the
Board to understand that, if they cannot install the sign as proposed,
the Association cannot have a sign. He said a directional sign of
the size requested is almost imperative.
301.6 Director Orton, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to not grant the
appeal. Mr. Burke then stated, in spite of his earlier comments,
they would rather have the Board "approve something".
1
1
1
1
1
2-7-84
Director Orton, seconded by Sharp, made a, motion to grant a variance
for a sign no larger than six square feet and set back at least six
feet from the street right-of-way. Upon roll call, the motion passed,
6-0.
•
SIGN APPEAL/PIZZA HUTS/2325 N. COLLEGE AVE. ,
Osborne introduced anappeal from the literal. provisions of the Sign
Ordinance submitted by Pizza,Huts for a sign at 2325 North.College
Avenue. Jim Waselues was present to represent the appeal.
Mr. Waselues addressed the Board, requesting permission to move an
existing free-standing sign from its present ten foot setback.to a
setback of forty feet. Waselues stated the cost of this move would
amount to about $1600 but that, to install a new sign which would
meet the size requirement would amount to about $6,000.
Director Johnson suggested the possibility of. removing the bottom
portion of the sign which depicts the "pizza man", that this might
reduce the square footage to within the allowable limit of 75 square
feet. Director Sharp asked Sign Inspector Rakes, if the. .bottom panel
of the sign could not be physically removed, but were to be painted
o ver with the same color as,the sub -structure, would it.be considered
as part of the sub-structure.rather.than part of the sign. Rakes
stated that which is not holding the sign up is considered part of
the sign. Waselues pointed out the design of the Pizza Hut sign is
t heir logo and they try to stay with it.at all their locations.
Director Lancaster noted the Sign Ordinance has been in effect for
about eleven years and it has taken that long to replace the non -conforming
signs with new signs, that there are only five or six left throughout
the City which do not conform. Lancaster stated he,could,not vote
t o approve a 120 square foot sign when the Ordinance requires it
t o be no larger than 75 square feet. Waselues asked for the size
of the "Casa Taco" sign next door to his business and Rakes stated
h e thought it was 75 square feet and conforming. Waselues asked if
he could keep the larger sign if he set.it,back even • farther. Rakes
e xplained 75 square feet is the maximum size allowed for a single
occupancy. -
Director Johnson, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to table the appeal
until the petitioner can determine if the "pizza man" portion of the
sign can be removed. Mr. Waselues stated he would have to.check with
his legal department about having a sign which is not standardized.
The motion passed, 5-0, with Director Bumpass absent at roll call.
3O•U
302.1
302.2
302.3
302.4
302.5
3v'-
2-7-84
SIGN APPEAL/PRESIDENTIAL CONVERSIONS/2887B N. COLLEGE AVE.
303.1 Osborne introduced an appeal from the literal provisions of the Sign
Ordinance submitted by "Presidential Conversions" for a sign at 2887B
North College Avenue. There was no one present to represent the appeal.
303.2 Director Lancaster noted the Ordinance does not permit two signs on
the same lot and there is an existing directional sign on the property.
Director Lancaster, seconded by Orton, made a motion to deny the appeal.
The motion passed, 4-1, with Director Johnson voting against the motion
and Director Bumpass absent from roll call.
AIRPORT NOISE
303.3 Director Osborne introduced an ordinance requiring that stationary
aircraft engine run-up testing operations be conducted in the noise
barrier at the Fayetteville Municipal Airport between the hours of
10:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M. Osborne stated the Board has been requested
by Skyways to table this item until they have had an opportunity to
review it and appear at a Board meeting, as they could not be present
at this meeting.
303.4 Director Johnson, seconded by Osborne, made a motion to table the
item. The motion passed, 5-0, with Director Bumpass absent at roll
call. Director Osborne stated that, although Skyways' attorney had
been notified in advance, the company officers had not had an opportunity
to review the information.
AIRPORT BIDDING
303.5 Director Osborne introduced a request by the Airport Manager for author-
ization to request bids to include the following items• A fuel farm
to be located north of the Airport Fire Station; a corporate hangar
to be constructed on the site of the existing fuel farm; a four -bay
car wash facility and fueling station for the rental car agencies,
to be located in the area directly north of the car rental parking
lot; and an air freight facility to be constructed on the east side
of the airport.
303.6 Director Lancaster, speaking for the Airport Committee, recommended
these bid requests be pursued. Lancaster, seconded by Johnson, made
a motion to approve the request. The motion passed, 5-0, with Bumpass
absent at roll call.
1
1
2-7-84
AIRPORT HANGAR LEASES
Osborne introduced consideration of lease agreements for the new hangar
facilities presently under construction.
Director Lancaster, speaking for the Airport Committee, made a motion
to proceed with approval of the leases. The motion was seconded by
Director Johnson. The motion passed, 5-0, with Bumpass absent at
roll call.
RESOLUTION NO. 17-84 APPEARS ON PAGE a01-1 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XVii
ENERGY CONSERVATION/AIRPORT TERMINAL
Osborne introduced a request by the Airport Manager for Board approval
of the installation of an energy conservation system for the airport
terminal building.
Director Sharp noted the lights are kept on twenty-four hours daily
in the maintenance room but the request is to install ultrasonic motion
detectors (personnel sensors) to turn the lights on if someone enters
the room. Sharp suggested perhaps a simple switch could be used which
a person could operate upon entering or leaving the room. Director
Lancaster stated the changes are not supposed to cost the City any
money in the long run because they eventually are supposed to save
money. Dale Frederick, Assistant Airport Manager, explained the recommen-
dation to install the personnel sensors was 'made by Cassady & Associates
and would be 100% guaranteed to result in cost savings. Sharp suggested
it might even be possible to obtain those same savings, at no charge,
by having a power company review the energy conservation possibilities.
Director Johnson explained what is proposed is a special kind of energy -
conserving lightbulb to replace the incandescent lamps presently being
used.
Director Osborne, seconded by'Shafp, made a motion to refer this request
to the Airport Committee to give them an opportunity to better acquaint
themselves with the request; and also'to give an opportunity to the
power company to review the situation. Frederick noted that the City
Would be able to purchase and install the same energy-saving equipment
being recommended but it would not carry the same guarantee as o.f.fered
by the firm. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
304:
304.1
304.2
304.3
304.4
304.5
306
2-7-84
ROAD NAMING
305.1 Osborne introduced a request by the Airport Manager that the Board
name the east side access road to the airport "East Airport Drive".
Director Lancaster, reporting for the Airport Committee, stated this
private drive goes nowhere but to the Airport and the name would be
appropriate.
305.2 Director Osborne, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to name the access
road "Ernest Lancaster Drive". Upon roll call, the motion passed,
5-0-1, with Director Lancaster abstaining.
RESOLUTION NO. 18-84 APPEARS ON PAGE oMp OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XVill
BILL OF ASSURANCE/CHESTNUT AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
305.3 Osborne introduced a request by Lenwyn Edens that the Board approve
a Bill of Assurance regarding the installation of improvements to
Chestnut Avenue, required in connection with the submission of a Large
Scale Development Plan for property at the corner of Chestnut and
West Sycamore Street. Lenwyn Edens was present to represent the request.
305.4 Mr. Edens addressed the Board, stating if his request is approved,
he would promise to complete his 25% share of improvements. He explained
presently the street does not exist and is blocked off, also that
the property owner to the north has not made improvements either.
He explained also the building he wishes to construct does not need
access from Chestnut, but will use access from W. Sycamore. He stated
he would prefer to get together with other property owners, when the
rest of the property west of Chestnut is sold, to pave the street
to City standards.
305.5 Director Orton made a motion to approve the request. Director Lancaster
asked Street Superintendent Clayton Powell to comment on this request.
Powell said the Bill of Assurance "would be better than nothing" but
that in 1963 the developer wanted to improve the streets in the existing
Parkers Plat by improving the existing road rights-of-way. Powell
stated the section of Chestnut in consideration now was to have been
improved by the developer at Phase II, a point which was never reached;
that now lots have been sold without those improvements having been
completed. Powell stated he has received a lot of complaints about
the street and he thinks, if it is allowed to continue to develop,
we should require the street to be built.
305.6 Director Lancaster asked the City Attorney what could be done legally
to clear up the situation. McCord stated he would be glad to look
into the facts, if there is a possibility the City might have some
legal recourse. Director Sharp asked the City Attorney if there had
been cases where, rather than granting a Bill of Assurance, one developer
1
1
2-7-84
would build the street and pave it and the second developer would
later build curbs and gutters and'sidewalks. McCord stated this has
been done; that the City Manager has said he does not recommend con-
structing half the street at one time, but has supported construction
as described by Sharp.
Mr. Edens stated he agreed with Powell that lots should not have been
sold before the promised improvements had been completed but the Skate
Place had been allowed to build without making improvements or executing
a Bill of Assurance. Powell explained the Skate Place building permit
had been issued at the time the developers made their promise to improve
the rest of the street, so it did not seem necessary at the time to
ask the Skate Place to make improvements. Director Osborne asked
Powell if there was a deadline placed on the commencement of Phase
Two and Powell stated there were only verbal promises made; Mr. Edens
noted, if there is nothing legally binding the developer to making
street improvements, his promise of a Bill of Assurance and his willingness
to enter into a street improvement district with others in the area
"is a thousand percent- more than what you've got right now to complete
the street".
Director Johnson seconded the motion to approve. Director Orton asked
that the City Attorney look into the issue of any legal obligations
binding the developer. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
SIDEWALK INSTALLATION/HARMON AVENUE
Director Osborne introduced a request by area
authorize the installation of a sidewalk along
Avenue from West Center Street to Fairview.
to represent this request.
Director Sharp reported residents attended the
at which the request was discussed, and it is
the committee that the sidewalk be installed.
by Orton, made a motion to that effect. Upon
passed, 6-0.
SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST/YORKTOWN SQUARE
residents that the Board
the east side of Harmon
There was no one present
Street Committee meeting
the recommendation of
Director Sharp, seconded
roll call, the motion
Director Osborne introduced a report from the Board Street Committee
regarding waivers requested by Wade Bishop, regarding the preliminary
plat of Yorktown Square.
Director Sharp, speaking for the Street Committee, reported the committee
addressed the question of the offset from Loxley Avenue, which creates
a dangerous situation where it goes into Rolling Hills Drive. Sharp
explained the offset is required to be 150 feet but in this case is
30fi
306.1
306.2
306.3
306.4
306.5
306.6
306.7
33i
2-7-84
307.1 only about 90 feet. Sharp stated the committee took no formal action
but wished the Board to review the situation, since there were serious
questions raised about the safety aspect.
307.2 Wade Bishop and Engineer Mel Milholland were present to address the
Board. Bishop stated the plat was designed in an attempt to have
a "nice street layout". Bishop stated also that Street Superintendent
Powell has found the layout to be the most practical approach and
has no serious objections. Powell stated that, during Plat Review
Committee, he stated that he did not object to granting the variance
and that it is an efficient and practical use of the lots being developed,
and that the maximum has been realized in the traffic circulation
of the interior. Powell stated he did not wish to oppose the Planning
Commission on the offset street intersection; also that he was not
opposed to it initially.
307.3 There was sentiment expressed by some Board members that it was premature
for the Board to be considering this request without it first being
taken up by the Planning Commission. The City Attorney explained
he had been asked if this request could be taken before the Board
and there is a provision in the Subdivision regulations that authorizes
a subdivider to appeal from disapproval of a plat as submitted. McCord
stated, even though the Planning Commission had not taken a final
vote for disapproval, they clearly indicated they disapproved the
failure to comply with the minimum jog requirement and the proposed
tandem lot; that the matter was tabled solely because the subdivider
didn't present proof of notice to abutting property owners as required
by the Ordinance. McCord noted the Board has the option of overriding
the Planning Commission on those two points, affirming the Planning
Commission or referring it back to the Planning Commission for further
study.
307.4 Director Orton stated she felt the Board should uphold the decision
of the Planning Commission since, when the Ordinance regarding tandem
lots was passed, the point was made that tandem lots were not to be
used by developers to try to get more lots, but were to be used in
cases where it was dictated by the terrain. Orton also noted the
150 foot offset requirement is for safety reasons, and she sees no
reason for the Board to abandon that planning guideline. Mel Milholland
stated the layout presently before the Board has been reviewed by
Plat Review and Subdivision Committees, as well as Planning Commission.
He stated they would prefer to use this layout and for this reason
have brought it before the Board in the hopes of expediting the project.
Bishop explained they now have obtained proof of notification of the
adjoining property owners.
307.5 Director Orton made a motion to uphold the decision of the Planning
Commission to disapprove the tandem lot and the failure to comply
with the minimum jog requirement. There was no second to that motion.
1
2-7-84
After further discussion, Director Sharp, seconded by Osborne, made
a motion to refer this item back to the Planning Commission. Director
Osborne stated he had received a note from property owners who wish
the Board to know they oppose the request simply because they were
not notified. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0..
POLICE & FIRE COMMITTEE REPORT
Osborne introduced a report from the Board Police and Fire Committee.
Director Bumpass reported the committee considered the new deadly
force policy which had also been considered,by the Police Chief and
•City Attorney, and the committee recommended the change in the policy
to reflect current case law on the use of deadly force in the pursuit
of felons., Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to
pass a resolution to this effect.• Upon roll call, the motion passed,
6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 19-84 APPEARS•ON.PAGE 494 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK X411
•
Director Osborne stated the review of possible improvements to the
Fire Department is tabled until a future meeting.
LAND PURCHASE
Osborne introduced a request by the Water and Sewer Superintendent
for authorization to purchase a 25 -acre parcel of-land.located -south
of, and adjacent to, the Pollution Control Plant property for the
appraised price of $50,000.
Director Lancaster, seconded by Orton, made a motion to approve the
request. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 20-84 APPEARS ON PAGE ot2o OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK XVvit.1
RICHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION/CITY LAKE ROAD
Director Osborne introduced a resolution authorizing the initiation
of condemnation proceedings for the acquisition of a ten foot street
and utility easement which lies on the east side of an existing 25
foot utility easement along the west side of City Lake Road (State
Highway 156 South), south of Pump Station Road.
30P
308.1
308.2
308.3
308.4
308.5
308.6
309
2-7-84
309.1 Director Bumpass, seconded by Johnson, made a motion to pass the reso-
lution.
309.2 Director Orton questioned the purpose of the acquisition. Assistant
City Manager McWethy explained it is needed for the location of lines
for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on the west side of the road
- that the highway widening will take place on the east side of the
road. McWethy stated he had met with the property owner involved
and believes "we are going to be able to work this out", but in order
to protect the City's interest and expedite the project, McWethy explained
authorization is being requested now with the intent to work things
out before filing any proceedings.
309.3 A resident of the area, Ms. Kelly, asked how far this work would extend.
McWethy stated the telephone line would start on City Lake Road where
Pump Station Road comes in (at the point of Dodson Lewis Lane), would
go along the west side of City Lake Road about 350 feet to the railroad
track, at which point the line would go under the road and adjoin
a City easement. Director Lancaster stated the first phase of the
Highway Department's road building would go to the Industrial Park.
Director Osborne pointed out the construction would stop at the point
of the new plant, that Ms. Kelly's property lies south of that point,
so that her property should not be affected. McWethy stated the total
fifty feet being acquired by the Highway Department, for the road
widening, is on the east side of the road (from parcels owned by the
Industrial Park Committee). McWethy stated the only parcel being
affected by the phone lines is the parcel now being addressed by the
Board. Director Osborne suggested the residents could obtain additional
details by calling the Assistant City Manager's Office. Upon roll
call, the motion passed, 6-0. r^
RESOLUTION NO. 21-84 APPEARS ON PAGE 2,1 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK Mk
j
1984 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE W/AMENDMENT
309.4 Osborne introduced an ordinance adopting the 1984 version of the National
Electric Code, with an amendment requiring that all lights be controlled
by approved switches.
309.5 City Attorney McCord stated the required Notice and three copies
of the Code have been filed with the City Clerk. The City Attorney
read the ordinance for the first time.
1
1
1
2-7-84
Director Lancaster asked Electrical Inspector Tom Tucker to explain
the proposed amendment and the reason for its adoption. Tucker stated
the Board had passed an ordinance to disallow "pull chains" and require
that all lights have switches, except for certain rooms. Tucker stated
the Electrical Board felt, in order to prevent accidents and to eliminate
theineed for "policing" the requirement, the wording should state
that all lights must have switches.
Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to suspend the
rules and place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call,
the motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for
the second time. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion
to further suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third and
final reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0. The City
Attorney read the ordinance for the final time. Upon roll call, the
ordinance passed, 6-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 2977 APPEARS ON PAGE fl '7y OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK x1/+
BID WAIVER/READY-MIXED CONCRETE
Osborne introduced an ordinance waiving competitive bidding requirements
for the purchase of ready -mixed concrete and authorizing a one-year
purchase agreement with Arkhola Sand and Gravel.
The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director
Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made'a motion to suspend the rules and
place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 6-0.
Director Lancaster stated it should be made clear the bidding is not
really being waived. The City Attorney stated the City did take compet-
itive quotations but the publication of the Notice of competitive
bids and the statutory requirements were not followed because of the
time frame.
The City Attorney read the ordinance for the second time. Director
Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to further suspend the
rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll
call, the motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance
for the final time. Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 6-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 2978 APPEARS ON PAGE &'J( OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK Yt//
310.1
310.2
310.3
310.4
310.5
310.6
311
2-7-84
BID WAIVER/APPLIANCES & FURNISHINGS
311.1 Osborne introduced an ordinance waiving competitive bidding requirements
for the purchase of appliances for the renovated City Hall; and autho-
rizing the purchase from Dennis Home Furnishings. The City Attorney
stated the Assistant City Manager has asked that this ordinance include
lateral files, data processing furnishings and benches for the Board
Room, which would be purchased from various businesses.
311.2 The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director
Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to suspend the rules and
place the ordinance on second reading. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the second
time. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to further
suspend the rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading.
Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the
ordinance for the final time.
311.3 Director Osborne asked if "benches" would include the benches for
the audience, the bench for the Judge, and the Board Room tables.
McWethy stated the ordinance was worded only to cover benches for
the audience, that it probably should be amended to cover the other
items.
311.4 Director Osborne, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to amend the
ordinance to authorize Marynm Bassett to acquire by negotiation the
furnishings discussed, including the tables for the Directors, the
Judge's bench, and attendant items. Director Orton asked that it
be made clear that quotations are being sought, even though the competitive
bidding is to be waived. Upon roll call, the amendment passed, 6-0.
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 6-0.
ORDINANCE 2979 APPEARS ON PAGE (%/ OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK
X d(
1984 BUDGET APPROVALS
311.5 Director Osborne introduced consideration of the 1984 budgets.
Finance Director Scott Linebaugh brought up changes to the budgets
which had been submitted to the Board, as follows:
311.6 Replacement of Page 2, General Fund Budget
Page 1, General Fund Budget: Change $1,410,031 to $1,327,770
before any adjustments
Page 37, General Fund Budget 10-001 should be increased
$4,000 to cover a part-time employee in the City Clerk's
Office (recommended by Finance Committee and inadvertently
omitted)
Page 47, General Fund Budget: Planning/Professional Services;
Not approved by Finance Committee but brought up by
1
1
1
2-7-84
Director Bumpass is the addition of $12,500 for matching
on a grant for planning on the renovation of Dickson
Street (a grant wherein the State would pay approximately
$50,000, property owners would pay approximately $12,500
and the City would pay approximately $12,500). Director
Bumpass noted this would only take place in the event
that we are selected as a "Main Street" City.
Page 9, Sanitation Budget: 20-051 - The budget now reflects
$94,000 for Northwest Arkansas Resource Recovery.
$44,100 of this is for an extension on Phase IV. The
Board has previously approved $90,000 for Phase IV
but overruns have caused this amount to be increased
by $52,143. This has been changed since the Finance
Committee meeting.
Linebaugh noted the total budget amounts to $23,568,713; of which
$12,038,000 is operating expenses; capital expenses are $6,400,000;
and bond expenses are $5,100,000 (rough figures'): He stated also
this budget places all funds on a December 31 year-end for the first
time in 25 years.
312.1
312.2
Director Orton stated that "3330" on page 8 should read "3308". 312.3
Director Osborne, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to approve the
budgets, with amendments as outlined by Mr; Linebaugh'. Upon roll
call, the motion passed, 6-0. -
RESOLUTION NO: 22-84 APPEARS ON PAGE � OF ORDINANCE &.RESOLUTION
BOOK )(VHJ •
Municipal Court Accounts Receivable
Linebaugh, in reference to a request made at budget hearings, reported
the Municipal Court accounts receivable have been studied and that
he has distributed a memo regarding these findings. After discussion
regarding collection problems on accounts over 120 days, it was decided
to ask the Municipal Court Judge and City Prosecutor for their recommen-
dations on how to address this problem.
•
OTHER BUSINESS
•
Committee on Opening of Renovated City Hall'
Director Sharp asked for recommendations from 'the Board'on festivities
for the opening of the renovated City Hall. Osborne stated this has
been discussed and a date agreed upon for May 1st: Osborne also stated
he had asked Director Johnson to coordinate. the effort; but that he
•
312.4
312.5
312.6
313
2-7-84
313.1 thought an employee and a citizen should also be chosen to serve on
a committee. Osborne asked that Director Sharp and a representative
of the City Manager's Office serve on that committee along with Director
Johnson and that they select two or three citizens to help coordinate
these efforts.
Highway 62 Widening
313.2 Director Sharp reported that the City Manager is pursuing the matter
of the widening of Highway 62 with the contractors.
Flouridation
313.3 City Engineer Don Bunn reported that he had visited the flouridation
facility to inspect the work which had been done. He stated the repairs
are almost completed, with one outside pipe left to be insulated.
Bunn stated flouride is expected to be ordered before the end of this
week and the facility is expected to be in operation within two weeks.
Director Osborne asked Bunn to submit a written report to the Board
for the next meeting. Bunn explained that one joint had failed back
in August, causing the rest of the flouride in the tank to leak out;
that there were several other similar joints which failed; that some
valves have been changed out or eliminated where problems have been
caused in the past. Bunn stated, with these, repairs, he thought the
facility should be "on line" for quite some time. At Director Johnson's
suggestion, Don Bunn agreed some parts should be kept on hand to eliminate
the problem of having to wait so long to make repairs; that the engineers
involved have indicated a willingness to do this.
Amendment to Parks Plan
Resolution Repealed/Public Hearing
313.4 Director Johnson stated the Board received a memo dated February 3
and addressed to City Manager Grimes, regarding the amendment to the
Parks Plan. Director Johnson, seconded by Sharp, made a motion to
repeal Resolution No. 139-83, which was a request of the Planning
Commission to hold a public hearing to amend the Parks Plan to comply
with a Supreme Court decision.
313.5 Director Orton questioned this action in that the Planning Commission
has not yet held a public hearing and has appointed a committee to
meet with the Parks Board. Assistant City Manager McWethy noted,
since there are three new planning commissioners, and since the commission
was not presented the entire green space ordinance, but only the amend-
ments, the action of the commission was to continue the public hearing
until a later meeting. Director Johnson stated the Parks Plan was
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, the Chairman of the Parks
and Recreation Advisory Board and by the Parks and Recreation Director.
1
1
2-7-84
Director Sharp pointed out, if the Board'adopts•the amendments now,
the City can begin enforcing the Parks ordinance again; that if the
Planning Commission came up With "some drastic changes", the Plan
can still be changed. City Attorney McCord explained the Board has
the discretion to wait 'until the Planning Commission completes the
process they have begun by appointing a committee and continuing the
public hearing, etc., or the Board has the statutory authority to
amend the Plan and amend the Ordinance without the public hearing
process. Ditector Orton asked if there was a legal requirement to
hold the public hearing. McCord stated the amendments can be made
to the ordinance either by the public hearing process or by a majority
vote of "the governing body".
Director Orton asked that it be made clear to the Planning Commission
that, if they have any suggested amendments, the Board would like
to receive those recommendations. Orton stated also she thought it
important in the planning process that the'Planning Commission become
familiar with the Parks Plan. The City Attorney stated, if the Board
should decide to adopt the amendments by a majority vote and expedite
the process, it would be redundant to hold a public hearing. Upon
roll tall, the motion passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 23-84 APPEARS ON PAGE Am OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK gym I1
Code Amendment by Majority Vote
City Attorney McCord explained State enabling legislation states a
planning ordinance may be amended by a majority vote of the governing
body without a prior public hearing by the Commission; that a recent
Supreme Court decision stated the ordinance must -expressly grant that
option to the governing body. McCord stated, since this is a procedural
aspect of the ordinance rather than substantive, he thinks this can
be done without a public hearing.
The City Attorney read an ordinance authorizing the Board to amend
the Plan•by amajority vote without the public hearing process. Director
Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to suspend the rules and
place the ordinance on second. reading. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the second
time. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass, made a motion to further
suspend the rules and place the'.otdinance on third and final reading. Upon
roll call, the motion passed, 64-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance
for the final time.
3i.
314.1
314.2
314.3
314.4
315
2-7-84
315.1 Director Orton commented that it is not good practice to bypass the
Planning Commission or dispense with a public hearing on an issue
that is a planning subject. Director Sharp pointed out that there
were hours of input from Planning Commissioners as well as from the
City Attorney, developers, citizens, and Parks and Recreation represen-
tatives but that the court has simply asked for changes to be made
to make things more specific. Upon roll call, the ordinance passed,
6-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 2980 APPEARS ON PAGE OW OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK X4'(
Ordinance to Amend Parks Plan
315.2 City Attorney McCord introduced, and read for the first time, an ordinance
amending the Parks Plan in accordance with the amendment prepared
by the Planning Consultant and reviewed and approved by the Parks
and Recreation Director, the former Chairman of the Planning Commission
and the City Attorney's Office. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass,
made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second
reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney
read the ordinance for the second time. Director Johnson, seconded
by Bumpass, made a motion to further suspend the rules and place the
ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the final time.
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 6-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 2981 APPEARS ON PAGE QJ'3 OF ORDINANCE Z RESOLUTION
BOOK KV)
Ordinance to Amend Parks Ordinance
315.3 City Attorney McCord introduced, and read for the first time, an ordinance
that would amend the Parks ordinance itself to comply with certain
requirements indicated in the IBI decision and outlined in his memorandum
to the Board dated February 3. Director Johnson, seconded by Bumpass,
made a motion to suspend the rules and place the ordinance on second
reading. Upon roll call, the motion passed, 6-0. The City Attorney
read the ordinance for the second time. Director Johnson, seconded
by Bumpass, made a motion to further suspend the rules and place the
ordinance on third and final reading. Upon roll call, the motion
passed, 6-0. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the final time.
Upon roll call, the ordinance passed, 6-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 2982 APPEARS ON PAGE 6,95" OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
BOOK X U
1
1
1
1
2-7-84
Glenn Will Lawsuit
City Attorney McCord asked that the Directors study the proposed settlement
offer in regards to the Glenn Will lawsuit, for consideration :at the
next meeting. McCord asked the Directorsto feel free to call him
with questions or requests for additional information.
Carroll Electric Cooperative Corporation/Rate Increase
McCord stated Attorney Walter Niblock, Counsel to the Beaver Water
District,,has advised him that the Carroll Electric Cooperative Corporation
has filed for a change in the wholesale power rate charged to members;
that the application is before the Public Service Commission and,
if granted, will result in a substantial increase to municipal members
of the Beaver Water District. McCord related that Niblock is requesting
each municipal member intervene in the case, opposing the proposed
rate increase.
Director Osborne stated he would be opposed to the rate increase,
but thinks the City would be "treading on the jurisdiction of the
Public Service Commission" to presume that we would know more about
the matter than they would. Osborne stated he thought it "was almost
rainbow chasing" to just oppose a rate increase without some factual
basis or without hiring rate consultants and efficiency experts.
•
Director Lancaster suggested the
opposing the rate increase, and
The motion was seconded by Bumpass
Board could simply pass,a resolution
he made a motion to that effect.
and upon roll call, passed, 6-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-84 APPEARS ON PAGE 02
BOOK )VH
OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION
Annual Meeting/Parks & Recreation Advisory Board
The annual meeting of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board with the
City Board of Directors was confirmed for February 14, 1984 at
4:15 P.M. in the Continuing Education Center.
Wage and Salary Study
Director Osborne asked that a committee be formed to review proposals
from firms who submitted qualifications for performing a comprehensive
wage and salary study. Osborne suggested the appointments of Marilyn
Johnson to chair the committee, along with Ernest Lancaster and Paul
Noland. Osborne stated the committee would narrow down the proposals
to those who will be interviewed, and arrange to schedule the interviews
with the committee, to be open to all Board members.
316.1
316.2
316.3
316.4
316.5
316.6
31t
2-7-84
Update on Solid Waste Project
317.1 Assistant City Manager McWethy noted an update on the Solid Waste
Facility from Ann Henry (Chair, Northwest Arkansas Resource Recovery
Authority) had been distributed to the Board.
MINUTES
317.2 The following corrections were made to the Minutes of the Board meeting
of January 17, 1984:
317.3 290.2: "Marian" should be "Marion"
317.4 280.1: "fringe" should read "fringe benefits"
317.5 With those corrections, the Minutes of the January 17, 1984 meeting
were approved as distributed.
ADJOURNMENT
317.6 With no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned
at 10:30 P.M.
1
1