HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-10-20 MinutesOctober 20, 1981
292
MINUTES OF A BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
A meeting of the Fayetteville City Board of Directors was held on
Tuesday, October 20, 1981, at 7:30 p.m. in the Board of Directors Room,
City Administration Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
PRESENT: Directors Lancaster, Noland, Osborne, Sharp, Todd, Bumpass (arrived
8:10), and Henry; City Manager Grimes, Assistant City Manager McWethy,
City Attorney McCord, City Clerk Koettel, and members of the press and
audience.
ABSENT: None
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Todd called the meeting to order and asked for a moment of
respectful silence.
PARKING PETITION
292.1 Mayor Todd introduced the consideration of a petition requesting
the establishment of additional "all day" parking in the downtown
area. The petition contained 190 signatures of persons working in the
downtown area asking that the Board, "install all day meters in the
three (3) western -most rows of parking spaces in lots behind Campbell -
Bell and to the west of First Place. Further, we recommend that the lot
at the corner of North East and Spring Streets be equipped with gates
making parking accessible by cards obtained from the City on a monthly
fee paid basis."
292.2 Consideration of a combination of short-term and long-term parking
meters on the west three rows of parking in the lot northwest of City
Hall on August 18, 1981, resulted in the Board tabling this matter for
six months.
292.3 Director Osborne made a proposal which he, Director Bumpass, and the
City staff felt would be a fair compromise. The proposal consisted of the
following:
292.4 1. Campbell -Bell Lot
a. two western rows be ten hour meters
b. three eastern rows remain two hour meters
292.5 2. First Federal Lot
a. .two western rows remain gated parking
b. row next to gated parking be ten hour meters
c. two eastern rows remain two hour meters
292.6 3. Parking rates be increased to a uniform 10¢ per hour
292.7 4. Increase fines to $2.00 if paid within twenty four (24) hours,
and $5.00 thereafter. Also, that the fines for parking on the
square be $5.00.
292.8 5. That this proposal become effective January 1, 1982.
292.9 6. Rates for gated lots be increased to $15.00 per month January 1, 1981
and then increased to $20.00 per month June 1, 1981.
1
1
1
October 20, 1981
293
293.1
293.2
Merchants from the square were present and expressed their opposition
to increased long-term parking.
Also, employees from Southwestern Bell Company were present and
expressed to the Board the desire for parking spaces. They explained
that since the new construction on the square has taken place they have
a very hard time locating parking places.
City Attorney McCord explained that the "long-term" meters could also
be used as short-term and that they were not exclusively ten hour meters.
Mr. Grimes, City Manager, explained to the audience that a parking
facility is under construction at the present time and should be completed
by December 1. This will resolve most of the problems with parking in
downtown Fayetteville.
After some discussion between the Board and the audience on rates,
Director Osborne amended his proposal to state that the fees for gated
lots be increased to $20.00 per month effective January 1, 1982.
A merchant of the square presented the Mayor with a petition requesting
that the lots remain as they are at present. The petition contained
approximately 659 names.
After a lengthy discussion on this item, Director Henry, seconded by
Sharp, moved that Director Osborne and Director Bumpass work with a committee
consisting of representatives from the merchants, the downtown employees,
and any other Board members, to make a recommendation and bring back to the
Board at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Upon roll call the motion
passed by a 6-0 vote, with Director Bumpass absent.
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
Mayor Todd introduced a request by the Traffic Superintendent for a
budget adjustment to allow the installation of a pedestrian crosswalk
signal at the intersection of North Street and College Avenue.
Mayor Todd explained that Washington Regional Medical Center is
constructing a parking lot at the southeast corner of North Street and
College Avenue. WRMC has indicated it is willing to spend up to
$5,000 to buy pedestrian crosswalk signals at this intersection. Therefore,
the Traffic Superintendent is recommending the expenditure of an
additional, unbudgeted, $5,000 to upgrade the electronics of the traffic
signal controller at the same time so as to make its circuits interchangeable
with other controllers. In this way, if repairs were needed to the
controller's electronics, "pop -in" printed circuits could be used from
existing replacement parts inventory.
Director Lancaster asked how the walk light would operate and Assistant
City Manager McWethy explained that it will operate with -the -traffic.
Mr. Grimes explained that there will be a push button for pedestrians
but that it will be tied to traffic volume and all traffic cannot be
stopped simply by pushing the button.
Discussion was held on whether the City should prohibit a right turn on
red at this intersection.
Director Lancaster stated that he felt this should be considered by
the Street Committee and recommendation received.
Mr. Grimes explained that the City needs the new
what decision is reached on right turns. He told the
is a standard NEMA signal and is interchangeable with
The controller could be purchased and then programmed
by the Street Committee.
Director Henry, seconded by Lancaster, moved that the $5,000 budget
adjustment be approved and the standard NEMA signal controller purchased,
and that the Street Committee consider this item and make a recommendation
to the Board.
Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 102-81 APPEARS ON PAGE d3 8 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK1KI 1
controller no matter
Board that the controller
other City signals.
to operate as recommended
293.3
293.4
293.5
293.6
293.7
293.8
b
293.9
293.10
293.11
293.12
293.13
293.14
293.15
293.16
October 20, 1981
294
HOUSING REHABILITATION
294.1 Mayor Todd introduced recommendations from the Community Development
Housing Director regarding amendments to the eligibility requirements
of the CD housing rehabilitation program.
294.2 All of the recommendations would tend to make the eligibility
requirements somewhat less restrictive; current and proposed requirements
are listed below. All other regulations would remain unchanged.
294.3 For the grant program which involves a direct cash grant, that is not
repaid, to persons over 60 years old:
Present maximum income limit $ 6,000
294.4 Proposed maximum income limit 10,000
294.5
294.6
Present maximum grant amount 8,000
Proposed maximum grant amount 10,000
For both the loan program, where funds are paid back, and for the
grant program:
294.7 Present rules: When the recipient dies the estate or heirs must pay
back the remaining grant or loan.
294.8 Proposed change: When the recipient (or, in the case of married couples,
either the husband or wife) dies, all repayment obligations cease.
294.9 Director Lancaster stated that he did not understand why the heirs
of persons having these grants and loans should be compensated if the makers
of the grants and loans died. He also expressed concern about the proposal
that would allow all repayment obligations to cease if only one spouse in
a married couple died.
294.10 Director Osborne stated that he realized the income would probably be reduced
in the case of a death of one of the spouses, but that it bothered him to
totally write off the obligation. He said he would prefer to defer the
294 11 payments rather than totally write off the obligation.
Director Bumpass also expressed his opposition to this proposed change.
294.12 Assistant City Manager McWethy explained that he cannot remember an
instance where any persons in these situations have died while still owing
the CD program money. He stated that in order to make a profit, a person
would have to die and probably not too many persons would be willing to do
that. He continued to explain that the program is for low and moderate
income families. Many times families are very interested in modernizing their
homes and fixing them up until they find out that the heirs are committed
to a mortgage on the property.
Upon further discussion, Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved
294.13 that the income limit for the grant program be raised as proposed from
$6,000 to $10,000 and that the maximum grant amount be raised as proposed
from $8,000 to $10,000, but that repayment be waived only for grants and
that the loans be repaid.
294.14 Upon roll call the motion passed 4-3, with Directors Lancaster, Todd,
and Bumpass voting in the minority.
RESOLUTION NO.103-81 APPEARS ON PAGER 38 OLOF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK, (j
SIDEWALK WAIVER
294.15 Mayor Todd introduced a request by American Air Filter for a waiver
of the literal requirements of the Master Sidewalk Plan, for property
being developed at the southwest corner of the intersection of Pump
Station Road and Armstrong Drive.
1
1
M
October 20, 1981
295
Tom Hughes, Manager of American Air Filter addressed the Board. He 295.1
III stated that he feels like sidewalks in the Industrial Park will become a
very desirable thing, and that at the point when the City determines these
are necessary, American Air Filter would be willing to contribute their
share. However, he did state that someone would need to check the area
first because of a ditch that would have to be rerouted.
Director Osborne asked the representative of American Air Filter 295.2
if they would be willing to enter into a bill of assurance stating that
they would construct a sidewalk upon the call of the City. The
representative's answer was yes, but that they would like at least a
year's notice so that they could budget for the expense of the sidewalk.
Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved that the sidewalk 295.3
0 requirement be postponed and that American Air Filter enter into a
CD bill of assurance stating that they would build the sidewalk upon the call
(3) of the City, with the intention being that the sidewalk would be constructed
when other sidewalks in the area are constructed.
7 Director Sharp stated that he would have to think about previous 295.4
Q requests of Goldkist and Mr. Purtle when voting on this issue. He said
Q that he thinks sidewalks should be built when construction is done.
Director Osborne pointed out that there is no pedestrian traffic 295.5
in Industrial Park.
Mayor Todd stated that this is an expansion financed with Act 9 bonds 295.6
and these are public funds. He said he had problems with waiving sidewalk
requirements under these conditions.
Upon roll call, the motion to postpone the sidewalk requirement 295.7
III failed by a 3-4 vote with Noland, Osborne, and Bumpass voting in the
minority.
PARKING TICKETS
This item was tabled until the next meeting when it would be considered 295.8
along with long-term parking.
BUILDING CODE
Mayor Todd introduced consideration of amendments to the Building
Code, principally having to do with drawings, plans, records, and
specifications.
City Attorney McCord read an ordinance amending the Building Code.
Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved that the rules be suspended
and the ordinance placed on second reading. Upon roll call the motion
passed 6-0 with Director Bumpass absent upon roll call. The City Attorney
then read the ordinance for the second time.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the rules be further
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. Upon roll
call the motion passed 6-0, with Director Bumpass absent. The City Attorney
then read the ordinance for the third time.
Mr. Freeman Wood, Building Inspector, was present to answer any questions.
He explained that the request being made was for approval to delete the
requirement that architectural drawings must be kept on file as a matter
of public record. He explained that these all have to be kept by the
inspection office and that there is not sufficient space to keep all of
this paperwork. Specifically, the request is that the Inspection Department
be allowed to retain those drawings for one and two family dwellings and
minor structures until construction is completed and that the drawings then
be removed and destroyed. For multi -family and commercial and industrial
structures, the request is that the drawings be retained in the Inspection
Office during construction, and that the drawings then be placed on
microfilm and the original drawings destroyed.
295.9
295.10
295.11
295.12
296
296 1
296.2
296.3
296.4
296.5
296.6
296.7
296.8
296.9
296.10
296.11
296.12
296.13
296.14
296.15
October 20, 1981
City Attorney McCord explained that this ordinance should not impose
any additional burdens on the public but will simply relieve the Inspection
Department of some record keeping.
Mr. Wood pointed out that the ordinance would require commercial
drawings to be reduced to 8;"x 14". This is so that the drawings
will fit on the City's microfilmer. One alternative would be to farm this
out to a firm that would microfilm the drawings. The present cost is
approximately 50Q per sheet.
One engineer in the audience commented that most consulting firms
in Fayetteville do not have reducing capacities.
Director Sharp suggested having the builder submit a microfilmed
set of plans and drawings to the City.
Director Bumpass moved that this item be tabled until the next meeting.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Mr. Grimes suggested that the property owner be contacted and offered
the set of drawings before they are destroyed. Mr. Wood stated that this
could be done.
Upon discussion, Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the
ordinance be amended to allow the builder an option of providing the
Inspection Department with a set of reduced drawings or a copy of the
drawings on microfilm. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Todd asked if the amended ordinance should pass. The ordinance
passed by a vote of 6-1 upon roll call, with Director Bumpass voting in
the minority.
ORDINANCE NO. 2763 APPEARS ON PAGE .5/ OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK ¥I/
FLOOD PLAIN
Mayor Todd introduced revisions to the City's flood plain management
regulations to comply with Federal Emergency Management Agency requirements.
City Attorney McCord read an ordinance revising the flood plain
ordinance.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the rules be suspended
and the ordinance placed on second reading. Upon roll call the motion passed
unanimously and the City Attorney read the ordinance for the second time.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the rules be further
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. Upon roll
call the motion passed unanimously and the City Attorney read the ordinance
for the third time.
Mr. Harold Lieberenz, Inspection Superintendent, explained that this
is basically a housekeeping item. The City of Fayetteville entered into
a temporary program seven years ago for a National Flood Insurance Program
and the government is now requiring these revisions. He presented a map of
the flood plain and explained that if the City does not amend its ordinance
the City will go off of the program on 1-20-82. He also stated that if the
City does not have this program then persons cannot receive federal loans
or flood insurance. Mr. Lieberenz pointed out that a total of 23 insurance
policies have been issued under this program insuring property valued at
$986,600.
Mr. Lieberenz discussed the flood plain insurance program in some detail
and distributed some handouts to the City Board members for their reference.
Mr. David Randle, a member of the audience, addressed the Board and
stated that this would directly affect him. He stated that in order to carry
forth with its proposed street widening plans it would be necessary for the
City to condemn approximately 35 feet of his building. Mr. Randle explained
that when he purchased the building it was part of a commercial establishment,
but that it has been remodeled and that the property is now zoned R-3. He
stated that he would request this to be rezoned again at the next board meeting
1
1
1
1
1
October 20, 1981
as the area cannot be used for residential uses. He explained that he can
only remodel within the existing structure because he is in a residential
zoning. He stated that if the City takes 35 feet of his property then he
is "effectively squelched." He also pointed out that in the long range
future the road may he widened and there will be a nine and one half foot
drop in front of his building
Director Bumpass moved that the item be tabled until the next meeting
so that some of the questions raised by Mr. Randle could be answered at
that time. The motion died for lack of a second.
Mr. Lieberenz explained that Mr. Randle is in the flood plain area
and that a building permit cannot be issued to anything in this area
because it would obstruct the flow of water. He stated that Mr. Randle
has an option open to build on piers, or the option to ask for a variance.
City Attorney McCord asked Mr. Randle if the reason he was unable to
obtain a permit at the present time is because his business is a commercial.
or industrial use and he is presently in a residential zoning. Mr.
Randle replied that this is correct.
Mayor Todd asked if the ordinance should pass. Upon roll call the
ordinance passed by a 6-1 vote, with Director Bumpass voting in the
minority.
ORDINANCE NO. 2764 APPEARS ON PAGE 53 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK )(//
AMBULANCE REGULATIONS
The City Attorney read an ordinance repealing the City's regulations
governing the operations of ambulances. Director Todd, seconded by Osborne,
moved that the rules be suspended and the ordinance placed on second
reading. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously, and the City Attorney
read the ordinance for the second time.
Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved that
and the ordinance placed on third and final reading.
motion passed unanimously, and the City Attorney read
the third time.
Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved that
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final
roll call the motion passed unanimously, and the City
ordinance for the third time.
Mayor Todd explained that the City's existing ordinance has been
superseded by Act 435 of 1976 which gives the ambulance regulatory
responsibility to the state.
There being no discussion, Mayor Todd called for a vote on the
ordinance. The ordinance passed unanimously upon roll call.
ORDINANCE NO. 2765 APPEARS ON PAGE .57 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK )C//
the rules be suspended
Upon roll call the
the ordinance for
the rules be
reading. Upon
Attorney read the
FISHING FEES
The City Attorney read an ordinance increasing the daily fishing
and boating permit fees at Lake Fayetteville and Lake Sequoyah from
$.50 to $1.00 effective January 1, 1982.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the rules be suspended
and the ordinance placed on second reading. Upon roll call the motion passed
unanimously, and the City Attorney read the ordinance for the second time.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the rules be further
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. Upon roll
call the motion passed unanimously, and the City Attorney read the ordinance
for the third time.
297
297.1
297.2
297.3
297.4
297.5
297.6
297.7
297.8
297.9
297.10
297.11
297.12
October 20, 1981
29S
298.1 Mayor Todd asked what the annual fee is and Purchasing Agent Mackey
replied that the annual fee is $10.00 and that persons were being
encouraged to purchase season permits for both boating and fishing.
Mayor Todd asked when the last increase of the annual fee was and Mr.
Mackey answered that he did not know. He stated that the stall rental
was increased last year from $20.00 to $40.00. Mayor Todd stated that
perhaps some consideration should be given to an increase in the annual
fee, and that this might be checked into by the City staff.
298.2 Mayor Todd asked if the ordinance should pass. The ordinance passed
unanimously upon roll call.
ORDINANCE NO. 2766 APPEARS ON PAGE 5Q OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK XII
SEWER ENGIINEERING
298.3 Mayor Todd introduced a request by the City Engineer for authorization
to continue the funding of a sewer study for the area along Highway 16 West.
Director Noland stated that in early 1980 the City Board requested
298.4 a study to determine the best way to sewer the area along Highway 16 West,
west of Highway 71. Approximately $1,800 has been spent on preliminary
engineering and surveying to date, and the City Engineer is asking for
authorization to spend an additional $2,200 to complete the project.
298.5 Director Noland, seconded by Henry, moved that authorization for
continuance of the study be given. Upon roll call the motion passed
unanimously.
FARMINGTON SEWER
298.6 Mayor Todd introduced consideration of an amendment to the Farmington
sewer service contract, principally having to do with making sewer taps
by Fayetteville crews.
298.7 Director Noland stated that presently the City of Farmington
contracts with private plumbers or individuals to make the sewer taps.
He explained that prior to 1977 the City of Fayetteville made the taps,
but because of such a backlog for the City of Fayetteville, it was agreed
to allow private plumbers or individuals to make the taps. The City of
Farmington has now requested that the City of Fayetteville take over the
service once again.
298.8 Director Osborne asked if the City of Fayetteville should receive more
for making the taps than is charged in the City of Fayetteville to cover
the driving time to Farmington.
298.9 City Engineer Bunn explained that the taps have already been paid for.
He explained also that the City of Fayetteville crews will make a group
of taps each time they travel to Farmington and will not be making a trip
for each tap that is to be installed.
298.10 Mr. Grimes stated that the City of Fayetteville feels it is to their
advantage to have City crews making the taps. He stated that the staff
feels that the City will not lose money by making the taps in groups.
298.11 Director Henry, seconded by Osborne, moved that the amendment to
the contract be approved and that if a cost overrun is experienced, the
City of Fayetteville will collect the overrun out of the revenue that
is presently reserved for expansion of the system.
298.12 Upon roll call the motion passed by a 6-1 vote, with Director
Bumpass voting in the minority.
RESOLUTION N0.104-81 APPEARS ON PAGEa 3 $,d OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOKX
SANITATION FEES
298.13 City Attorney McCord stated that this was an oversight when the
sanitation rate was increased several months ago. The ordinance failed to
1
1
October 20, 1981
299
include the charges-per—minutes for special sanitation pickups.
City Attorney McCord read an ordinance amending the existing
ordinance to state that in the event commercial establishments require
sanitation service more frequently than twice each week, the rate for
such additional service shall be $.44 per additional can or per additional
minute.
Director Henry, seconded by Sharp, moved that the rules be suspended
and the ordinance placed on second reading. Upon roll call the motion passed
unanimously, and the City Attorney read the ordinance for the third time.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the rules be further
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. Upon roll
call the motion passed unanimously, and the City Attorney read the
O ordinance for the third time.
Mayor Todd asked who decides whether the charge is per can or per
minute.
Mr. Grimes explained that several places have a large bin, and
these are charged on a per minute basis. If there are cans instead of a
(Cr bin, then the charge is per can.
Q Mayor Todd, seconded by Osborne, moved that the ordinance be amended
by reading, ". . .shall be $.44 per additional can, or per additional minute
if there are no additional cans."
Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
Director Osborne raised the question of whether the City can break-even
at only $.44 per can. He asked the City staff to look into this matter
and advise the Board on the rationale of $.44 per can.
Mayor Todd called for a vote on the amended ordinance.
II/Upon roll call the ordinance passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 2767 APPEARS ON PAGE 59 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK )U%
LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL
Mayor Todd introduced a request by the City Planning Commission that
the city Board indicate its position on a proposed "landscape ordinance."
Mr. Ernest Jacks of the Planning Commission was present and explained
that the Planning Commission felt it should get the Board's feelingeon
a landscape ordinance before much.time and effort was expended into developing
this ordinance. He stated thatsome members of the Planning Commission do
not want to increase the cost of development, and others feel like this
is needed in Fayetteville. Mr. Jacks stated that the drafted ordinance is
similar to one of the City of Bentonville. He also pointed out that the
costs had been projected for one local project, and it would be .15% of
the total project cost.
Director Henry expressed approval of a landscape ordinance. She
stated that some of the developers will do great things and leave trees
and plants, and yet there are always some who will strip down everything
and replace it with concrete and pavement.
Director Sharp asked if it was known how much energy savings would be
experienced by having trees surrounding a business. Mr. Jacks stated that
these figures were available but you would have to be very specific on the
orientation.
Director Osborne expressed a concern about having dead trees in the
middle of islands. Mr. Jacks replied that the program would require some
maintenance for the businessman and that there would be enforcement
required on the part of the City.
Director Bumpass moved that this be considered at a later meeting
after input was received from all parties concerned. The motion died for
lack of a second.
299.1
299.2
299.3
299.4
299.5
299.6
299.7
299.8
299.9
299.10
299.11
299.12
299.13
299.14
299.15
299.16
October 20, 1981
300
300.1 Director Osborne, seconded by Sharp, moved that the Planning Commission
proceed with the development of a landscape ordinance. Upon roll call the
motion passed by a 6-1 vote, with Director Bumpass voting in the minority.
RESOLUTION NO.105-81 APPEARS ON PAGF.32 v OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOKXI)
CENTER STREET LIGHTING
300.2 Mayor Todd introduced consideration of authorization of a budget
adjustment to allow thecontinuation of decorative street lighting on
Center Street from East Avenue to College. Under this proposal, Center
Street property owners would pay for the cost of eight decorative street-
lights, similar in style to those around the Square, with the city paying to
have underground electric service extended, and the City crews doing the
trenching work.
300.3 Director Henry, seconded by Sharp, moved that the budget adjustment be
approved.
300.4 Assistant City Manager McWethy explained that the price would be
$2,071.00 plus tax because the trenching would be in the sidewalk. This
would be a savings of $800.00.
300.5 Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously with Director Osborne
abstaining.
RESOLUTION NO. 106-81 APPEARS ON PAGE 0139 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK All
WALKER PARK
300.6 This item was tabled.
BID AWARDS
300.7 Director Henry, seconded by Lancaster, moved that bid #454 for a truck
for the Street Department and a van for the Fayetteville Youth Center be
awarded to the low bidder. The low bidder for the van was Jim Ray
Chevrolet at $12,962.43, and the low bid for the truck was from Lewis Ford
for $9,267.00 and both of these figures are within budget.
300.8 Upon roll call the motion passed 6-0, with Director Bumpass abstaining.
ELECTRIC MOTORS/W&S MOTORS
300.9 Director Henry, seconded by Osborne, moved that bid #466 for electric
motors for the Water and Sewer Department be awarded to the low bidder,
H.K. Brewer of Little Rock in the amount of $7,986.21.
300.10 Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
TIRES AND TUBES
300.11 Director Henry, seconded by Osborne, moved that the bid be awarded
for a one-year contract for tires and tubes as outlined in the Director's
agenda (see agenda). This is a joint project between the City and County.
300.12 The Board expressed their approval of working with the County in
order to receive increased savings on these items. Upon roll call the motion
passed unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
PARKING APRON AND LIGHT
TAXIWAY CONSTRUCTION
300.13 Purchasing Agent Mackey stated that he was recommending that bid
no. 468 be awarded to McClinton Anchor of Fayetteville, in the amount of
$31,659.00, the low bidder. The City will pay half of the total project
cost.
300.14 Director Lancaster, seconded by Henry, moved that the bid be awarded.
Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
October 20, 1981
FIRE STATION RADIO SYSTEM
Assistant City Manager McWethy explained that the Central Fire
Station has two radio systems, and one has burned out. It is a necessity
that the Fire Station have two independent radio systems, and thus the
Board is requested to appropriate $2,046.72 including tax, from surplus
revenue General Fund to capital outlay for the fire department for a
new radio system. The new system will be the main radio system and
the existing system will he the backup.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that this appropriation
be approved. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously with Director
Bumpass voting "present."
FIRE PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR RENTAL PROPERTIES
Mr. John Durham, Fire Inspector of the Fire Department, addressed the
Board and stated that he had requested Mr. McCord to draft an ordinance
requiring owners of residential property to provide adequate fire prevention
safeguards.
Discussion was held on the subject, and Director Bumpass, seconded
by Osborne, moved that the item be tabled until a future meeting when the
item could be placed on the agenda and the public was notified of the
meeting.
Director Osborne, seconded by Sharp, moved that the motion be amended
to refer the item to the Police and Fire Committee. The motion passed by
a 5-2 vote, with Director Todd and Henry voting in the minority.
Mayor Todd called for a vote on the amended motion and the motion passed 301.6
by a unanimous vote.
301
301.1
301.2
301.3
301.4
301.5
NEWSPAPER RECYCLING
Director Henry stated that routes are being changed for pickups and that
the Fire Department and Police Department have agreed to provide a place
for collection of the newspapers. The Firemen have agreed to keep the
collection area clean and in order since the money will be applied to the
Firemen's Fund. If this proves'successful, similar dropoff points could be
established.
BUDGET RENT -A -CAR
Mr. Grimes reported that Budget Rent-A-Car, previously owned by Joe
Segers had been sold to Lewis Ford, and that a request is being made to
transfer the contract to Lewis Ford for the remainder of this year,
subject to renegotiation at the end of the year.
Director Osborne, seconded by Henry, moved that the transfer be
approved. Upon roll call the motion passed by a 6-0 vote, with
Director Bumpass abstaining. RES. NO. 107-81 APPEARS ON PAGE2VoOF ORD & RES BOOK)C!I
301.7
301.8
301.9
ATTIC BUILDING
City Attorney McCord reported that Lynn Wade is closing on the purchase
of the attic building, the old 'hospital auxillary building on Center Street,
and that he has requested a quitclaim deed from the City. McCord stated that
a resolution would be needed for this.
Director Henry, seconded by Osborne, moved that the quitclaim deed
be executed. Upon roll call the motion passed unanimously.
301.10
301.11
RESOLUTION N0.108 -81 APPEARS ON PAGE a43 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK XII
EASEMENTS ACROSS MARINONI PROPERTY
City Attorney McCord stated that back in the early 1970s the City
granted easements across the Marinoni property for water and sewer lines.
The property is presently being subdivided and platted and the developers
would like to have general utility easements and not just water and sewer.
301.12
October 20, 1981
302
They are asking the City to vacate the old easements so that general utility
easements can be platted.
302.1 City Attorney read an ordinance vacating the easements.
302.2 Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved that the rules be suspended
and the ordinance placed on second reading. Upon roll call the motion passed
unanimously. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the second time.
302.3 Director Osborne, seconded by Noland, moved that the rules be further
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. Upon roll
call the motion passed unanimously. The City Attorney read the ordinance for
the third time.
302.4 Mayor Todd asked if the ordinance should pass. Upon roll call the
ordinance passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 2768 APPEARS ON PAGE 4'p OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION 8000 0)
CITY POOL
302.5 Mayor Todd stated that he would like to see the staff proceed in
dealing with potential contractors for the City swimming pool.
302.6 Mr. Grimes stated that some things are being done on this, and that
they will get together and try to speed things up.
BYPASS ACCESSES
302 7 The Board asked the City Manager to write to the State Highway
Department and determine how many accesses to the bypass were allowed when
the bypass was constructed.
302.8 CEC BUILDING
Assistant City Manager McWethy stated that he had toured the CEC
building with architect Delvin Nation and that the City could be ready to
turn the building over to the University by the end of the week. He
stated that the University would like to take possession by next Monday,
October 26, 1981, because there is a conference scheduled for the later part
302.9 of that week in the CEC.
McWethy stated that there is a potential problem in that the lease
agreement states that the building will be available to the public when
not used for continuing education purposes, for the amount of the janitorial
cleanup fee. The University proposes a fee schedule of a minimum of $1.00
per head or $25.00 minimum administrative fee. Some of the fees go up to
$250.00 per day. McWethy stated this does not coincide with what the public
302.10 was told when the HMR tax was voted on in 1977.
Director Lancaster stated that the City should abide by what they
told the voters.
302.11 Mr. Grimes stated that the City will get together with the University
and work this out before the building is released.
302.12 Mayor Todd asked the City staff to provide a timetable for those
items listed on the emergency operations critique.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CRITIQUE
3MIIUTES
02.13
The minutes of the October 6, 1981 meeting were approved as submitted
with the following corrections:
302.14 Paragraph 284.6 should read, . .agreeing to install a sidewalk upon
302.15 the call of the City. The motion passed unanimously upon roll call."
Paragraph 290.2 should read, ". . .estimated cost is $250,000; 90%
federal and 10% local funds."
302.16 Paragraph 285.1 should be corrected to state,
with Ms.Lewis..."
. .had
also visited
1
October 20, 1981
Paragraph 280.6 should read, ". . .Mayor Todd pointediout that some
of the land in the area is already rezoned, and when that is developed
traffic may be sufficient to install a traffic light."
Paragraph 279.5 should read, ". . .determined is that of whether
the rezoning would create traffic congestions and thus defeat the City's
comprehensive plan for zoning along the bypass."
CERTIFICATE FROM THE U S. COUNCIL FOR THE
INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF DISABLED PERSONS
Mayor Todd presented a certificate that was awarded to Fayetteville
recognizing Fayetteville for uniting to develop full participation of
disabled citizens in American society.
O PLAQUE FROM GOODWILL MISSION FROM TAIWAN
A plaque had been presented to the City of Fayetteville stating,
"All Men are Brothers," from the Youth Goodwill Mission, Republic of China.
a
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m.
303
303.1
303.2
303.3
303.4
303.5