HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-07-03 Minutes96
MINUTES OF A BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
The City Board of Directors met in regular session on Tuesday, July 3, 1979,
at 7:30 P.M. in the Directors Room, City Administration Building, Fayetteville,
Arkansas.
PRESENT: Mayor David Malone, Directors Ernest Lancaster, John Todd,
Paul Noland, and Phil Colwell; City Manager Don Grimes,
City Attorney Jim McCord, City Clerk Angie Medlock, and
Administrative Assistant David McWethy.
ABSENT: Directors Ann Henry and Richard Osborne.
OTHERS PRESENT: Members of the audience and representatives of the news media.
CALL TO ORDER
96.1 Following a moment of respectful silence and roll call, the mayor called for
consideration of the first item of business.
TOWNSHIP ROAD EXTENSION
96.2 Director Todd had requested the Board to review the Planning Commission
recommendation to (1) keep the extension of Township Road from Old Wire Road
to Crossover Road on the master street plan; and (2) to keep both Yorkwood
and Winwood as cul-de-sac streets not intersecting with Township.
96.3 Director Todd stated that this extension is an important subject and he
feels the Board should take the opportunity to review the decision of the
Planning Commission.
96.4 Todd noted that the concern seems to be moving traffic from the east side
of town in mid -town and a "collector" street (as Township is proposed to be) is
not defined as one which would be used to "move traffic". He questioned the
meanings of the classification. He noted that the National Highway Classifica-
tion Manual has classifications systems to be followed which define "collector"
as a street which penetrates neighborhoods and distributes trips from an arterial
street to an area of their ultimate destination which may be on a local or collector
street; conversely, the collector also collects traffic from local streets and
channels it into the arterial system. Todd said it is not intended that thru
traffic be carried by collector streets.
96.5 Director Todd pointed out a comment from Planning Consultant Larry Wood
in reference to Elaine Street which said a transportation system must.be
viewed in its ultimate form and not as if development will occur without
developments on the street, and with Highway 265, Joyce Street, Old Wire Road,
and Township all four lanes or more, traffic not generated from this neighbor-
hood would be less inclined to cut through it. Todd said this is not anything
like a collector street when you are talking about four lanes of traffic --if
that is what is involved, it should be defined. "I think we should set
the record straight and define just what we're talking about. I think that
if you do in fact, intend for it to be a collector street, then there needs
to be some major revision of the design of the street as it is set out".
96.6 Todd commented that whether you let it happen passively or whether you
consciously let it go ahead, you are going to have a street serving major
centers of activity, high traffic volume and thru movement.
96.7 Director Todd said they are talking about "creating a monster in the
middle of a pleasant neighborhood". He said he did not think anyone would
1
1
1
97
be particularly concerned if the extension of Township was treated as a true 97.1
collector street. He asked the Board to consider the possibility that another
III through street between Highway 45 and Old Wire Road is not necessary. He
pointed out that it would take many more resources than would be available for
many years to bring Old Wire Road and Highway 45 both up to standards.
City Manager Grimes introduced Mr. Jim Brannon from the engineering firm 97.2
which prepared various alternate routes to the extension.
Director John Todd read into the record a letter in opposition from Mrs. 97.3
Ruth Ostmeyer. (This letter is on file in the City Clerk's office). The mayor
also acknowledged a letter to the city manager from Mr. and Mrs. Roy Wilkerson.
Mr. Roy Stanley agreed with Director Todd that if you are looking for an 97.4
arterial street, you should define it as such and establish the best location.
He noted that Alternate #2 along the creekbed as shown, would not run directly
0 in front of anyone's home. He contended that an arterial street is not needed,
O and if it is, a more suitable location could be found. He pointed out also that
Alternate #2 would be the better route as it is located in the 100 -year flood
03 plain and theland is not suitable for residential building.
0 City Manager Grimes commented that there are no immediate plans for the 97.5
Q extension of Township Road and it is not on the street priority list. He
Q estimated approximately 8-10 years before anything could be done and if the
financial condition of the City remains as is, it may take several years to
complete the project once it is started.
Director Todd stated that if the alternative route is best, they should 97.5
begin working with the developer who has already submitted a preliminary plat
for property in that area to make provisions for right-of-way.
Mayor Malone pointed out that one thing which Fayetteville residents 97.8
have expressed a need for is more connecting streets.
IIIDirector Noland stated that some residents on Overcrest and the south end 97.9
of Winwood feel their streets are being used as collector streets. He pointed
out that Township Road has been on the Master Street Plan for several years,
even before Winwood Subdivision was developed.
Frank Blew asked if collector's streets were allowed access to private 97.10
driveways and Mr. Grimes explained that they could be, but it is preferable
not to have driveway access to collector streets.
In response to someone in the audience Mr. Brannon explained that a 97.11
collector street is to be 36 feet wide and this, in his judgement, would not
be sufficient for a four -lane street. He said it would, however, be adequate
for a two-lane street with emergency parking.
Director Colwell pointed out that if development takes place in the 97.12
extension of Township Road area as planned, there would be a possibility of
600 families in that particular area. He commented that with the situation
as is, the majority of cars would go through the residential area (Winwood)
to get back to Highway 45. Colwell said the vehicles need a street which
could carry them to Old Wire Road.
In response to Director Todd, Mr. Grimes said the Planning Commission 97.13
had refuted the rumor that a subdivision east of Highway 265 had dedicated
80 feet right-of-way to the City. Grimes said a smaller right-of-way may
have been given.
Joe Tarvin said he felt people may be concerned about the width of the 97.14
proposed street and suggested the width be cut down and provide for two
lanes of traffic with one emergency lane. Tarvin suggested further that the
III Board recommend that Township Road not be extended past 'Highway 265 and that
it encircle Winwood Baptist Church rather than extend directly in front of
the church.
Director Noland commented that several years ago the Church had proposed 97.15
the street extension to go behind the Church rather than going so close to the
98
98.1 front, however, he was not sure if that was still the sentiment felt by
church members.
98.2 Someone in the audience pointed out the need for a south street to
get to Root School. Director Todd said at least one access is to be provided
for getting to Highway 45.
98.3 Following further discussion, Director Todd moved the Township Road
extension from Old Wire Road be deleted from the Master Street Plan. The
mayor declared said motion died for lack of a second.
98.4 Director Todd moved that Township Road east of Azalea Terrace be
deleted from the Master Street Plan. Director Colwell asked how this
would affect the preliminary subdivision plat to the north of the proposed
extension and Jim Brannon said the preliminary plat has shown two accesses
onto Township. Todd said he feels this is irrelevant as the plans are
"only on paper" and could be changed. No second was received for Director
Todd's motion.
98.5 Director Todd then moved that Alternate #2 be adopted (moving along the
creekbed to Azalea Terrace and east from there) for the extension of Township
Road. Director Noland seconded the motion. Noland stated that he had
originally favored this alternate route, but after reading Planning Commission
and Technical Advisory minutes, he has changed his mind because it was pointed
out that this would be a deviation from the existing Master Street Plan and
could cause problems in existing neighborhoods where there has not been a
master street plan for a collector street.
98.6 Mayor Malone said he would not be in favor of Alternate #2 as it is north
of the people they are hoping to serve. Malone said he would be more inclined
to go along with the suggestion that Township Road be terminated before reaching
Highway 265, if so recommended by the Planning Commission after studying the
idea.
98.7 The mayor called for a vote on Director Todd's motion that Alternate
#2 be adopted. Director Lancaster stated that if the Board wants to change
the Planning Commission recommendation, they should send the iters back to the
Planning Commission for further study.
98.8 The recorded vote on the motion was:
Ayes: Todd.
Nays: Lancaster, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion failed to pass.
98.9 Director Todd then moved the Township Road extension be modified to
request the City Manager to study the concept and implementation feasibility
of encircling the Winwood Baptist Church with the proposed extension. Director
Noland seconded the motion.
98.10 Malone pointed out the procedure to revise the master street plan is to
indicate to the Planning Commission that the Board would like them to study
and make a recommendation back to the Board. Todd pointed out that this
is not a major revision and said he feels they should"take hold and do something".
Malone stated that the Board has appointed the Planning Commission to study this
kind of problem and have indicated in their procedures they will be consulted.
98.11 The recorded vote on the motion was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, and Malone.
Nays: Colwell.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
98.12 Director Todd then moved the Planning Commission recommendation be
adopted that when Township Road is constructed, both Winwood and Yorkwood
be retained as cul-de-sac streets and neither street intersect with Township
Road. Director Noland seconded this motion. The recorded vote was:
1
1
1
1
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
Steve Anderson stated that he did not feel the Board had given the
residents any satisfaction and had not addressed the question of whether
the street should be a collector.
Director Tddd noted a discrepancy in a memo from Planning Administrator
Bobbie Jones and the Planning Commission minutes in that the minutes reflected
sidewalks would be required for both sides of the extension and Bobbie Jones,
in her memo to the Board, had indicated that sidewalks were discussed favorably,
but were not included in the motion. City Attorney McCord explained that
sidewalks are required on both sides of the street for collector streets.
Director Todd then moved that all residential lots which directly abut
the extension of Township Road be offered a privacy fence separating Township
Road from their residential lot, at the expense of the City. The mayor
declared this motion died for lack of a second. Malone commented that this
type of question could be worked out at the design stage of the extension.
Jim Newport asked that the City try to keep construction and delivery
trucks off of Winwood and Bois de Arc when the subdivision to the east is
developed. Director Todd said he felt the City should concur with this
request.
Mr. Grimes said this would require the developer to build their own
access into their subdivision. Newport said they could build an access
from Highway 45 rather than using Winwood as a through street. Grimes pointed
out that if Township Road was extended as a collector street people wouldn't
need to use Winwood.
Mayor Malone asked the city manager to discuss with the developers what
can be done to keep them from using Winwood. Malone noted, however, that
Winwood is a dedicated public street.
Director Todd then moved the Board go on record to state that Township
Road extended east of Old Wire Road should never be upgraded above a collector
classification. This motion also died for lack of a second.
SIGN APPEAL - Pettus & Johnson
Phyllis Johnson explained the requested variance is that the law
office of Pettus & Johnson be allowed to construct a free-standing sign on
the corner of East Dickson and Highland. She explained that one of their
main goals has been historical preservation of the building. She said the
building is 12 and 13 feet from thest:reets•and they are requesting permission
to place a small free-standing sign on the corner of the intersection of
Dickson and Highland. She said the primary reason they do not want to place
a wall sign (which would be conforming) is for asthetic purposes and because
of the character of the building. Johson said they propose a sign 2 x 3 feet
which would not interfere with visibility of traffic, and will set the sign
back as far as possible from the intersection.
Following a short discussion, Director Noland moved the variance be
granted. Director Lancaster seconded the motion.
Director Todd asked if the variance could be restricted to the current
property owner.
Director Noland moved the motion be amended to reflect the variance be
temporary for law offices occupied by Pettus & Johnson. Lancaster seconded
the amended motion. The recorded vote on the motion was:
99
99 1
99.2
99.3
99.4
99.5
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.9
99.10
99.11
99.12
100
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the variance request granted.
ZONING FEE INCREASE
The City Attorney read an ordinance increasing the fees of zoning
petitions, board of adjustment variance petitions, conditional use permits,
and planned unit development plats submitted to the City Planning Office.
City Manager Grimes explained the proposed increase in fees was a result
of discussion at the previous year's budget meeting when the inspection
department was asked to furnish cost figures for processing the various
applications.
Director Todd asked if the proposed fees are based on current costs
and Inspection Superintendent Harold Lieberenz said "yes". Todd was con-
cerned that the proposed fees are rounded to the next highest $5.00 amount
and suggested the Board consider at this time increasing fees to the next
lower $5.00 amount and as of January 1980 increase fees further to the re-
quested amount.
Director Colwell asked Mr. Lieberenz if he had figures on number of
applications from residential versus commercial. Mr. Lieberenz said he
did not, and pointed otu that whether the application was submitted by
residential or commercial, it would require approximately the same amount
of time to process. Lieberenz noted that both Springdale and Lowell have
gone to a $50 fee for rezoning and Springdale requires the applicant to
do the advertising, which costs approximately $20. He said Lowell has
indicated they are not breaking even with the $50 fee.
Director Colwell
amended to $25, since most Boara of Adjustment variances are submitted
by residential property owners.
1
1
100 1 Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the variance request granted.
ZONING FEE INCREASE
100.2 The City Attorney read an ordinance increasing the fees of zoning
petitions, board of adjustment variance petitions, conditional use permits,
and planned unit development plats submitted to the City Planning Office.
City Manager Grimes explained the proposed increase in fees was a result of
discussion at the previous year's budget meeting when the inspection
department was asked to furnish cost figures for processing the various
applications.
100.3 Director Colwell moved the rules be suspended and the ordinance placed
on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed and the city attorney read the ordinance
for the second time.
100.4 Director Noland, seconded by Lancaster, moved the rules be further
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded
Vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed and the city attorney read the ordinance
for the third and final time.
100.5 Director Todd asked if the proposed fees are based on current costs and
Inspection Superintendent Harold Lieberenz said "yes". Todd was concerned
that the proposed fees are rounded to the next highest $5.00 amount and
suggested the Board consider at this time increasing fees to the next lower
$5.00 amount and as of January 1980 increase fees further to the requested
amounts.
100.6 Director Colwell asked Mr. Lieberenz if he had figures on the number of
applications from residential versus commercial. Mr. Lieberenz said he did
not, and pointed out that whether the application was submitted by residential
or commercial, it would require approximately the same amount of time to
process. Lieberenz noted that both Springdale and Lowell have gone to a
$50 fee . Springdale requires the applicant to do the advertising, which
costs approximately $20. He said Lowell has indicated they are not breaking
even with the $50 fee.
100.7 Following discussion, Director Colwell moved the proposed ordinance
be amended to reflect a $25 fee for a Board of Adjustment application,
since most of the Board of Adjustment applications are submitted by residential
property owners. Director Todd seconded the motion. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
100.8 Director Todd moved the fees be rounded to the next lower $5.00 amount,
with the stipulation that the fees would be increased to thehigher $5.00
figure as of January 1980. Director Lancaster seconded the motion.
100.9 The city attorney explained that the fee charged does not have to be
exact.. Director Noland said he sympathized with Director Todd's concerns, but
noted that the City has been subsidizing these applications for a long period
of ttiime.
1
1
7-3-79
101
Following discussion with the City Attorney, Director Todd withdrew 101.1
his motion and Director Lancaster withdrew his second. It was also pointed
out that no fee is charged for publishing the rezoning ordinance in the news-
paper, if the rezoning petition is approved by the Board.
The city attorney read the ordinance for the third time. The mayor asked 101.2
if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2538 APPEARS ON PAGE 109 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK VII.
0) The city attorney then read an ordinance increasing fees paid for 101.3
0 subdivision plats and lot split applications. Director Todd, seconded by
CO Noland, moved the rules be suspended and the ordinance placed on second
reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Q Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed and the city attorney read the ordinance
for the second time.
Director Noland, seconded by Director Lancaster moved the rules be further 101.4
suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote
was:.
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed and the city attorney read the ordinance
for the third and final time.
There being no discussion, the mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. 101.5
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2539 APPEARS ON PAGE 111 OR ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK VII.
CD SEWER
Mayor Malone acknowledged a recommendation from the Community Development 101.6
Committee regarding projects to be done under the 1976 Community Development
sewer line program and recommending four small portions of the overall project
be deleted and some work -previously -done and no -longer -needed accounts in the
1975 and 1976 programs be closed out and $37,211 be transferred to this sewer
project. It was also recommended that the bid for the remaining work be
awarded to Braun Excavating Company for $88,839 plus the cost of blasting any
rock encountered. and SB -2.
Director Todd questioned what would happen to the right of way on these 101.7
parcels and Community Development Director Rick Mason said it would remain as
an easement.
Director Mason pointed out that the four parcels which they are requesting 101.8
be deleted are on private sewer mains and the residents have expressed opposition
July 3, 1979
102
102.1 to Community Development installing public lines. Mason pointed out that
the bid, as recommended, does delete the four projects which they are
requesting be taken out of the program.
102.2 Director Lancaster, seconded by Director Todd, moved a resolution be
approved transferring funds from work -previously -done and no -longer -needed
accounts (.$37,000) to this sewer project; and authorizing a contract with
Braun Excavating for the installation of sewer lines at a cost of $88,000
plus the cost of blasting any rock formations encountered.
102.3 Director Noland asked if there would be any problems due to Community
Development obtaining the easement and Rick Mason said there would not be.
He explained that since they have acquired the easements, they would want
to retain them.
102.4 The recorded vote on the notion was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the resolution passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 60-79 APPEARS ON PAGE 222 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK VII.
(transfer of funds)
RESOLUTION NO. 63-79 APPEARS ON PAGE 236 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK VII.
(award of bid)
EASEMENT ABANDONMENT
102.5 The City Attorney explained that an easement abandonment in the Mt.
Sequoyah area has been settled and would not require City Board action.
UTILITY CONDEMNATIONS / HIGHWAY 71 SOUTH
102.6 The mayor explained the proposed resolution would authorize the initiation
of condemnation proceedings, regarding the acquisition of utility relocation
easements in connection with Highway 71B South street widening project.
The mayor asked if any of the condemnation suits had been settled and City
Manager Don Grimes said he thought a couple of the condemnations had been
worked out.
102.7 George Lockhart, owner of one of the properties to be condemned, stated
that there is property on the other side of the street which could be used
for the relocations. He was concerned about why the City is attempting to
condemn land for Warner Cable service. Lockhart asked how the property would
be restored after the utility relocation and stated that the amount of money
offered would not even pay the cost of restoring the landscaping.
102.8 City Manager Don Grimes explained that in this street widening project
the highway department is responsible for widening the street and the City is
responsible for relocation of utilities. Grimes said the utilities are now
located in public right-of-way but will be required to relocate due to the
widening project, thus the City must provide them with an easement.
102.9 City Attorney McCord explained that he would obtain an appraisal on the
property from an independent appraisor before filing the condemnation pro-
ceedings and would try to reach a settlement with the property owner. McCord
told Mr. Lockhart that he would also have the option of waiting until the
project is completed before settling the condemnation.
102.10 Director Lancaster, seconded by Colwell, moved passage of the resolution.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
RESOLUTION NO. 61-79 APPEARS ON PAGE 224
OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK VII.
1
July 3, 1979
CONDEMNATIONS / ZION ROAD SEWER PROJECT
The Imayor opened discussion on a resolution authorizing the initiation
of condemnation proceedings regarding the acquisition of permanent and tem-
porary construction easements in connection with the Zion Road sewer line
project.
There being no public opposition, Director Noland, seconded by Lancaster,
moved the resolution be approved. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the resolution passed.
103
103.1
103.2
0) RESOLUTION NO. 62-79 APPEARS ON PAGE 233 OF ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION BOOK VII.
COSTREET PRIORITY LIST RECOMMENDATIONS
Director Colwell moved the following recommendations of the Board 103.3
Street Committee:
Q 1) Gregg Street from Elm to Ash and Spruce to North, and North
Street from Gregg to 100 feet west of Skull Creek Bridge be
moved up to Items 3 and 4 on the priority list, and the North
Street Railroad crossing be moved to Item 4A;
2) Razorback Road from U. S. 62 West to 15th Street construction
be added as Item 6;
3) Sycamore from Gregg to Woolsey and Porter Road from Hatfield
to Deane be moved to Items 20 and 21; and
4) the following items be added: #15 and #16 --Old Wire Road,
Phases I and II from Highway 45 to Township Road to Highway 265;
#17 --Poplar from Leverett to Gregg; #18 --Old Missouri Road from
Rolling Hills to Sweetbriar. (See page 106 for the complete priority list.)
Director Todd seconded the motion. 103.4
Mayor Malone stated that they are hoping most of these projects can be 103.5
funded with Federal Urban Systems monies --75% federal and 25% local, and the
priority list merely sets a priority for construction of streets when and
if money becomes available.
Following discussion, Director Noland moved the Zion Road overpass be 103.6
added to the priority list as Item 19. Director Colwell seconded the motion.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
Steve Anderson asked that the Board consider moving the Morningside 103.7
Drive extension from Fletcher to Huntsville Road further down on the priority
list. Mayor Malone commented that there would be plenty of time to move it,
as it would be several years before plans would be ready and funding available
for the extension project.
Mrs. Polly, a Fletcher Street resident, said she did not feel the residents 103.8
had received any satisfaction from the Board. Mayor Malone explained the
highway department and City Board would hold public hearings on the Fletcher
Street project before proceeding with the work.
Director Todd acknowledged a phone call from Mrs. Glenna Hart expressing 103.9
concern about the Fletcher Street project. The mayor said he had received a
call from Ernie Deane, also concerned about Fletcher Street.
July 3, 1979
104
104.1 The mayor called for a vote on the motion by Colwell, as amended to
add the Zion Road overpass as Item 19. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
104.2 Director Colwell presented the new drawings of the bypass access roads
which showed those roads north of the fairgrounds as access roads in progress
and those south of the fairgrounds as contemplated for construction soon.
104.3 Mayor Malone questioned the need for Alternate A, which goes north to
Highway 68, between Johnson Road and Highway 112. He said he felt it
unnecessary and asked the City Manager to discuss the possibility with the
Highway Department that the Johnson Road interchange provide a street going
north in place of this additional overpass. Mr. Grimes said he would check
with the highway department on this.
AWARD OF BID / Dockery Lane Sewer
104.4 Purchasing Officer Sturman Mackey recommended award of a bid for sewer
line installations on Dockery Lane and Highway 16 West/Porter Road to Pyramid
Construction Company.
104.5 Director Noland, seconded by Director Todd, moved the recommendation be
accepted. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent at roll call: Lancaster.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
AWARD OF BID / Police Department
104.6 Purchasing Officer Mackey recommended award of the bid for police
department communication equipment to low bidders on all items. He said
this is a state -funded project, funded through the Arkansas Crime Commission.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
COMMERCE DRIVE
104.7 City Manager Grimes asked for approval for after -the -fact earth work
for Commerce Drive located in the Industrial Park.
104.8 Mayor Malone, seconded by Director Colwell, moved the approval be granted.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The motion was declared passed.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
104.9 City :lananer Gripes said they are searching for a rehabilitation
specialist for the Corrunity Development department as the present rehabilitation
person has submitted his resignation. Grimes said the present rate of pay
for this position is $7,200 and asked for authorization to increase the salary
1
1
0)
"Q
Q
July 3, 1979
for this position to $11,000 in order to hire a person qualified for the job.
Mr. Grimes said this position would be paid from Community Development funds.
Director Noland, seconded by Colwell, moved the salary be increased not
to exceed $11,000 per year. The recorded vote on the motion was:
Ayes: Lancaster, Todd, Noland, Malone, and Colwell.
Nays: None.
Absent: Henry and Osborne.
The mayor declared the motion passed.
SIDEWALKS
- Mr. .Zacks expressed concern to the Board about the condition of and
lack of sidewalks in Fayetteville, and gravel on city streets which makes it
difficult for pedestrains to walk in town.
MINUTES
The minutes of the June 19, 1979 meeting were approved as submitted.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for the Board's consideration, the
meeting adjourned at 11:00 P.M.
105
105.1
105.2
105.3
105.4
105.5
CO
0
106
4
,77
Ul
07
§
ce
cC
c774 in
PRIN. ART. FAP:
LU
- \ \ \ 2 \ \\\ -
. . / ,ce cc �\ \. \r
\,
o\ «_\ \; / / - -o
/& °� . \Z} f° 3 !\
/) \\ 03 \\ C 7 {) \ ta 2-
7 3
}= §c4
\ j
\) \ . . \ \ \
Vi 0
I rin o 0 L.
\}0(3 0 \ \ \ \ } if -
4 \
�\ {\ �\ \ 0 \ \ \ 0 \ ) /
:a,; rJ C11Z 0 ! 0 =
3 0 , xLa—
< § § \ } \ ` L uLc_-J
\ \ } \ ( ) ) { \ \ Ems:
Yta
/
.72
C11. rN
PROSPECT ST. TO DOUGLAS AVF.
RAILROAD CROSSIN(
OLD WIRE RD.
OLD WIRE RD.
01 7.0
2
ROLLING HILLS DR. TO SWEETRRIAR DR.
OLD In. RD
1
1
0)
w
0
Q
n
m
Z m
1
A
Q
n Loi
1
1 0
m
ti
yQ
i
'J
A
rnA
A
114
• 1.44CO
144 lot K.1
ata 01 H100S IL 5'0
N C 3
AN A r r
o 8 n n
2 <<
A
0N3 0V10 H100S 01 Z9 'S'0
8
O
O
r
3R1 01 N313H
1SV3 91 HS 01 NR1RH
A21aar 01 AVEI
t V r CO v
VD 0 r.. O
0 0 0 0
n
0
000"w3da9 01 Aa
331:19 01 Aa3'1091NU
DJ
03
.^.00^11\433219
V1115, 01 3N3d1
NJ ND
4-1
O
<
A O
U.S. 71 FRONTAGE RD. TO ALTA
1D3dS0ad 01 �'M111NM
PO PO
N
O
rn
1.11a0N 01 0N013A313
'021 dd1210d
A3S100M 01 993219
o
OD 0 0 0
m A A A A A n m A A A A .0 A 77
n n n 'n n n - n n n m -n n n 0
9 o D o g - 4 0 9 g 9
N N f N N N N N N r N N
1 -1 -I -1 -1 -1 -1 -4 y -1 -I•
O T G A T m A A n- T< m "I < A '1 < A T< n A o n n A N n
D n 10 m A� r D D m D r D m C
Q 8mQ 8 0 0 g oa 8-g 3mo 8 8 0 0$ S;g g
N O D N In N r S D N C D N 0
D y D M N D A~ 0 N
y S 3 K - y y r P 4 -08 4 9 CO rA . 1 0 O 1
yy r�'GG 5rD D<. mhc DA.
Zm 0 O Z�0 Zm0 0 Zm0 CP (T�'
02 yr or. om �Tn 00
o m o n o m A
K m K K K
nr o r r r r A A• o Ar Ar - 0 0
r I- R 1 R n m
0
R
a01D
8
n n n n n n r n n n n n
O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 C 0 0 0
UDIr utol
OD O r
1J1 L11
CIDv n
1/1
OD
OD
- - CO OD OD CO CO CO CO CC CO CO CO
0 0 0 CO O O O O O - O C •�
n 0 0 n n 0 n n
- -
ti
K K -P K -< { K K K
.
r
rn
-44
x
u, p
107
Z
0
Q
T
•
•
•
Z.
CZ yr Zp Fes+ Z CW ?C-
7C .� cc i- - o- - � C 2 Z LF r � G
J N N J N . N ai ` N . N iLi G W 4: N U W v N
w U ..> V• r . U< C iU.. Z €.47..
2 j-
F J 6 Ji F- in tr Fi N 2F2 LI Z 0 F? w` �4 Ji
W
'1
Q 2 Z
N b 4 P- * 3 b
U V CIO V U