Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-10-04 MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS October 4, 1977 The Fayetteville City Board of Directors met in regular session on October 4, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. in the Directors Room of the City Administration Building. N PRESENT: City Manager Donald Grimes, City Attorney Jim McCord, City Clerk CO Darlene Westbrook; and Directors Ernest Lancaster, John Todd, Paul Noland, Al Hughes, David Malone, Philip Colwell, and Ann Henry. QABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Members of the audience and representatives of the news media. r 1 91 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Ernest Lancaster called the meeting to order. Following a moment of 91.1 respectful silence and roll call, the Mayor asked for consideration of the first item of business. ANNEXATION At its September 20, 1977 meeting, the Board discussed an annexation proposal for an area lying east of Crossover Road (Highway 265) between Highway 45 East and the Lake Fayetteville area. At that meeting the Board had tabled further con- sideration to pursue the possibility of accepting covenants executed by the area property owners by which they would agree, rather than be annexed, to limit the use of their property to uses allowed in the City's R-1 and A-1 zoning classifi- cation. Mr. Leonard Greenhaw proposed for his client, Mrs. Eleanor Williams, that her covenant allow use of her property for R-0 purposes so that her dance studio (now under construction) will be a conforming use. Greenhaw did not feel the property along Crossover Road would be desirable for residential construction since increasing traffic volumes would result in increased noise. He questioned whether the cost of an annexation election would justify annexing the small number of people. Mrs. Williams indicated she would not agree to execute a covenant unless her property were allowed as a conforming use. She stated that she plans to ex- pand the studio in the future but would not be allowed an expansion if the studio is a non -conforming use. Mayor Lancaster explained that the annexed area would be annexed as A-1 and would remain under that classification until individual property owners success- fully petition the Planning Commission for rezoning. Residents of the area present were interested in availability of city services, particularly sewer. The City Manager informed the property owners as to existing sewer facilities and noted that the entire area would probably be served within five years. Mr. Olan Parker questioned whether the City would pave the 91 91.2 91.3 91.4 91.5 92 gravel roads in the area and noted that the City would require connection to the sewer system when the system becomes available. 92.1 In regards to Mrs. Williams' property, the City Attorney advised that Mrs. Williams might petition for rezoning the property with the assurance that the property be used only for a dance studio. 92.2 The City Attorney read an ordinance to annex the property and to set an annexation election date of November 29. 92.3 Since availability of sewer service would depend upon topography and economic feasibilities, Director Noland moved the ordinance be amended to delete reference to "sewer" as one service which would be available within three years. The motion was seconded by Colwell. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. 92.4 Director Malone, seconded by Todd, moved rules be suspended and the ordinance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time. 92.5 Director Malone, seconded by Noland, moved rules be further suspended and the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third time. 92.6 The Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The Mayor declared the ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 2383 APPEARS ON PAGE 319 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION ASSURING SEWER SERVICE 1 92.7 Director Noland moved adoption of a resolution which would state the Board's policy that the City will attempt to provide sewer service, consistent with City policy, to the proposed annexation area,. if annexed, as soon as economically feasible for that particular area to be sewered. The motion was seconded by Malone. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 82-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 204 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V 92.8 Director Malone moved that the Board next consider the fourth agenda item. The motion was seconded by Noalnd and the recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. 92 1 1 93 REZONING APPEAL - R77-24 / Elm Street & Green Acres Road / John & Terry Box The appeal was initially heard at the August 16, 1977, meeting and an 93.1 ordinance to rezone the property subsequently left on first reading pending further study by the Planning Commission of rezoning the entire tract along Green Acres to an R-0 classification. The rezoning petictton requested that a 1.2 acre tract on the northwest corner of the intersection be rezoned from R-1 Low Density Resi- dential to R-0 Residential Office. Since the Planning Commission did not agree that additional rezoning was necessary, the original appeal was heard. The City Attorney noted that the petitioners had offered to execute a bill 93.2 of assurance whereby the development would have all access from Green Acres Road and that only single family residential or professional offices would be con - (U structed. The City Attorney then read the ordinance the second time. CO Dr. Terry Box explained that his request was that R-0 be allowed at a 93.3 depth of 374 feet on Elm Street. He stated that he would keep all entrances and U exits off of Elm Street. Mrs. Denver Hutson, in opposition to the rezoning request, expressed con- 93.4 Q cern about possible dominoe effects the rezoning would have upon the Elm Q Street residential neighborhood. Mr. George Curme was also concerned that no assurance could be given that other non-residential uses would not eventually develop along Elm Street Mr. Waldo Austin stated he favored the rezoning so long as it did not in- 93.5 clude his property which lies immediately north of the Box property. Dr. Spencer Albright supported the rezoning request since the rezoning would represent the most logical use and development of the property and would also protect Elm Street from R-2 encroachments. The petitioners assured that they would execute a bill of assurance to 93.6 limit the use of the property to uses listed under Use Unit 25 of the Zoning Ordinance and that they would provide -vehicular accessvtto the development exclusively from Green Acres Road.. DoctorBox.stated he did not intend to extend .further west of Elm Street than what'he had proposed. Director Colwell, seconded by Todd, moved rules be further suspended and 93.7 the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time. 1 The Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was: 93.8 Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None Abstain: Hughes The Mayor declared the ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 2384 APPEARS ON PAGE 321 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V LOT SIZE VARIANCE - Crossover Road / John Beard, petitioner Mr. John Beard had requested a variance from Ordinance 2353 minimum lot size requirements allowable for installation of septic tanks. Beard addressed the Board telling them he planned to construct a residential home at the 1.38 acre site but that the public sewer was 700 feet to the south and would not be economically feasible for him to connect. 93 93.9 94 94.1 City Manager Grimes believed the City could work with Mr. Beard to find a mutually acceptable solution which would allow him to connect to the public sewer. He requested the Board table the matter to allow consideration of alternatives including economic feasibility of the City extending the sewer. 94.2 In response to Director Todd, the City Attorney advised that the Board had not adopted criteria for granting variances. Director Todd felt an im- portant issue was whether the Board wanted to create a precedent by waiving the minimum lot size. 94.3 Director Noland moved the item be tabled for two weeks to allow the staff and Mr. Beard to confer as to possibilities of extending the sewer. The motion was seconded by Director Hughes and the recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. LOT SIZE VARIANCE - Highway 62 West / Roy Lister, petitioner 94.4 The petitioner had requested variance from minimum lot size requirements of Ordinance 2353. The petitioner had proposed installation of a septic tank on a .61 acre lot to serve a proposed pharmacy. 94.5 Attorney John Everett was present to speak in behalf of the request and told the Board of Lister's plans to construct a pharmacy at the site. He presented the Board with copies of percolation test results certified by Frank Blew and approved by the State Health Department. Everett stated that the test concluded the site would sustain a septic tank efficiently. In regards to the existence of public sewer to the east of the property, Everett stated that the topography and probable legal complications regarding easements made connection to the public sewer im- II/practical. Unless the variance is granted, Everett felt the land would be rendered useless. Everett stated that the proposed pharmacy would have one commode and lavatory and that no harsh chemicals would be discharged. He felt the main purpose of Ordinance 2353 was to regulate septic systems in subdivisions and not small, individual lots. 94.6 Lister stated he would prefer to connect to the public sewer but that the City Engineer had advised connection would be impossible without some type of lift system. 94.7 Director Todd was concerned that the Board would provide precedent for future variances and was also concerned that the C-2 zoning classification would permit a use having a heavy water consumption. The City Attorney advised that a building permit could not be refused if the proposed pharmacy would be on a septic system approved by the State Health Department and it could not be shown that City requirements would afford greater protection to the public health and safety. Everett indicated his client would be willing to execute a covenant whereby the property use would* 94.8 Director Hughes, seconded by Malone, moved the variance be granted conditional upon execution of a covenant assuring the property would be used only for a pharmacy. The City Manager stated he wished to retain the option of connecting to the existing sewer. Mr. Howard Barnes, neighboring property owner, stated he would grant an easement to Lister to allow a sewer line to cross his property to connect with the sewer on Hollywood Avenue. 94.9 The City Attorney read for the first time an ordinance to grant the variance. Director Hughes, seconded by Malone, moved rules be suspended and the ordinance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster Nays: Todd Abstain: Colwell The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time. 1 *be restricted to a pharmacy. 94 95 Director Hughes, seconded by Noland, moved rules be further suspended and 95.1 the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster Nays: Todd, Noland Abstain: Colwell Director Noland changed his vote to "yes" and the City Attorney read the ordi- nance the third and final time. Mayor Lancaster moved the ordinance be tabled to allow the City Manager 95.2 to pursue alternatives for the Lister property. So that the ordinance could remain on second reading, Director Noland changed his vote to "nay". Mr. Lister noted that the State Pharmacy Board will be meeting October 12 95.3 to consider his application and would not meet again for the remainder of the N year. Lister was concerned that the Pharmacy Board would not grant his applica- (Y) tion unless they knew whether the proposed location was approved. Director Malone stated that it appeared as if the Board was willing to grant the waiver U if provisions cannot be made for connection to the sewer. There being no further discussion, the ordinance was left on second reading. 95.4 Q ANNEXATION - Highway 16 West The County Court had approved annexation of 41.31 acres, located on the 95.5 north side of Highway 16 West, owned by Mr. Randall Barnes. The City Attorney advised that, before the Board could consider an ordinance 95.6 to annex the property, 30 days are required to pass following County Court approval. Since that time had not yet lapsed, the City Attorney advised the Board table the item. The City Manager advised the Board that improvements had not been installed 95.7 in the proposed subdivision and that the annexation would not comply with the Board's adopted annexation policy. He felt the Board might wish to indicate its disposition concerning the proposed annexation so that the petitioner would not be led to believe it would ultimately be approved. Director Todd, seconded by Colwell, moved a resolution be adopted to dis- 95.8 approve the annexation and to state that any approval of annexation of subdivi- sions would be dependent upon upon compliance with Board annexation policies. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None r 1 RESOLUTION NO. 83-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 205 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION - 1978 Program The City Attorney read a resolution to authorize the City Manager to file an application for Community Development Block Grant funds for the 1978 program. Director Noland, seconded by Henry, moved approval of the resolution. The record- ed vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 84 77 APPEARS ON PAGE 206 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V 95 95.9 96 AUTHORIZE OUTSIDE CITY SEWER SERVICE -Fox Hunter Road & Lake Sequoyah Drive 96.1 The City Manager requested authorization be given for outside city sewer service for 1805 and 1809 Fox Hunter Road and for 411 Lake Sequoyah Drive. He also requested authorization to administratively approve future applications for outside city sewer service so long as the applications involve individually owned lots which would require no additional cost to the City. 96.2 Director Noland moved approval of extensions to the three locations and that the City Manager be authorized to permit adjacent individual lots to connect to the sewer if no additional costs to be'incurred by the City and the lots are contiguous to the city and outside sewer rates charged.., Director Todd wished to delay authorization for administrative approval of future requests. Director Noland amended his motion to reflect approval of the three extensions only. The motion was seconded by Director Todd. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Hughes The motion was declared passed. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING WATER AND SEWER FUND TRANSFER 96.3 Director Noland reported that the Board Water and Sewer Committee recommended the transfer of $44,184 from Water and Sewer Budget Account 5791 to the Fayetteville Housing Authority for the installation of water and sewer improvements contained in the Urban Renewal Program. 96.4 The City Attorney read a resolution authorizing the transfer. Director Noland, seconded by Malone, moved adoption of the resolution. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 85-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 207 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES 96.5 The City Attorney read a resolution authorizing a contract with Associated Appraisers, Inc. for appraisal of easements acquired in connection with Community Development program projects, and in compliance with HUD regulations implementing the 1970 Relocation and Real Property Acquisitions Act. 96.6 CD Administrator Charles Hoffman reported that, of seven invitations, two replies were received, one of which contained unacceptable provisions. Director Noland noted that, at $125 per parcel, the appraisal would cost more than most acquisitions. He felt easement acquisitions should be taken into consideration in determining future CD projects. 96.7 Director Hughes, seconded by Henry, moved adoption of the resolution. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Noland The motion was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 86-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 208 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V 96 1 1 97 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DATA PROCESSING CONTRACT The City Attorney read a resolution to authorize execution of a contract 97.1 with Northwest Computer Services for purchase of computer time at a monthly charge of $2,500. The Board discussed at length the existing data processing program and 97.2 its contributions: The Board also discussed whether other alternatives existed which would be more beneficial to the City. City Controller Pat Tobin informed the Board that, because of time restraints, other sources had not been extensively investigated. He noted that the City had used the services of Northwest Computer Services in the past. In response to Director Malone, Tobin stated it would be acceptable for the Board to specify a contract amount rather than specifying which (V firm would be utilized. He noted that recent costs had been higher than usual CO because of implementation of the new water billing system and that costs could remain high during development of budgetary accounting programs. Q Director Todd was concered that no solicitation of bids had been made for 97.3 a contract which would have a yearly amount of $30,000. The City Manager stated Northwest Computer Services was the only company contacted which expressed any interest in serving the City. The City Controller stated that, until recently, there had been no justification for the City acquiring its own equipment. Some Directors felt it might be justifiable for the city to acquire its own system to allow the City to develop long-range problems and to serve other institutions. Mr. George Pauls, owner of Northwest Computer Services, stated he planned 97.4 to install a system in Fayetteville within the next 90 days. He did not forsee any reason why his firm would have to terminate the contract prior to the expiration of the contract. He assured the Directors that the City would receive 90 -day notice should his company not be able to continue servicing the City. Director Malone moved to amend the resolution to authorize a computer services contract not to exceed $2,500 per month to be executed by the City Manager and with the understanding that other sources will be investigated. The motion was seconded by Director Noland and the recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. The Mayor then asked if the resolution should pass. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 87-77 APPEARS ON PAGE209 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALARY INCREASE - Computer Programmer/Supervisor The City Manager explained that, in recrutiting for a computer programmer/ supervisor to fill a recently created vacancy, it was learned that the budgeted salary of $10,250 was inadequate to be competitive. He said the City had been advised that a salary of $16,000 would be required to obtain a qualified, ex- perienced person to fill the position. He recommended the additional alloca- tion be authorized. The additional amount was anticipated to come from General Fund surplus. 97 97.5 97.6 97.7 98 98.1 Director Todd felt that data processing activities were experiencing increased costs without providing offsetting benefits and said he was not "sold" on the idea of expanding data processing activities. The City Controller stated that the City was at a "crossroads" in its data processing activities in that it had to decide whether to expand its activities or maintain its status quo. 98.2 Director Hughes felt it unfair to other city employees to use a system whereby slot salaries are increased as they become vacant and replacements recruited. 98.3 Director Colwell, seconded by Henry, moved the salary be increased to $16,000 and that the additional funds be made available from the General Fund surplus. The Mayor asked if the resolution should pass. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Todd The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 88-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 210 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V ORDINANCE AMENDING MASTER STREET PLAN - North College Avenue 98.4 Because the Board of Adjustment had denied his request for a setback variance, Mr. Jim January requested the Board to amend the Master Street Plan for North College between Cleburn Street and Baxter Lane. Amendment of the Master Street Plan would allow January to construct a new building at a setback of 50 feet rather than the required 60 feet. 98.5 Mr. January explained that his proposed building would have to be decreased in size if the street plan is not amended. The Board discussed at length with Mr. January what his construction plans were and what alternatives might exist which would eliminate necessity for amending the Master Street Plan. 98.6 Upon completion of discussion, Director Hughes moved the Master Street Plan be amended to provide for 34 feet setback on the east side of North College and 40 feet setback on the west. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Todd 98.7 The City Attorney read an ordinance to amend the street plan in accordance with the approved motion. Director Hughes, seconded by Colwell, moved rules be sus- pended and the ordinance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Todd The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time. 98.8 Director Hughes, seconded by Colwell, moved rules be further suspended and the ordinance read the third and final time. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time. 98.9 The Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Todd The Mayor declared the ordinance passed. ORDINANCE NO. 2385 APPEARS ON PAGE 322 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V 98 1 1 1 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL GRANT MATCH The City Attorney read a resolution to authorize commitment of an addi- tional $200 for City participation in an Intergovernmental Personnel Act grant for the purpose of refining Civil Service examination and selection pro- cedures. Following slight discussion, Director Todd, seconded by Noland, moved adoption of the resolution. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Malone, Lancaster Nays: Hughes, Colwell The Mayor declared the resolution passed. (v RESOLUTION NO. 89-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 211 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V CO AWARD OF BIDS V COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HOUSING REHABILITATION PROJECTS Q The City Purchasing Officer recommended award of bids for housing rehabili- tation contract for structures located at 1414 South Washington ($3,139); 532 Blair ($3,676); 2322 Stone ($4,704); 921 Lighton Trail ($2,621); and 204 South College ($2,758) to King Carrao, the low bidder. Director Colwell referred to the Lighton Trail structure, noting that it did not seem to be in disrepair. CD Administrator Charles Hoffman replied that the structure would receive a new roof, interior and exterior painting, and energy-saving improvements. In discussion of HUD correspondence which requested ,justification for what the agency believed to be excessive administrative cost allocations, Grimes stated he felt Fayetteville's administrative costs were higher than most other CD grant programs because the Fayetteville program is not subsidized by other departments. Grimes guessed that most other cities are absorbing CD costs through other departments. Director Noland, seconded by Malone, moved approval of the recommendation. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster Nays: Colwell The motion was declared passed. 99 AIR CONDITIONING UNITS Purchasing Officer Sturman Mackey recommended award of bids for replacement of air conditioning units at the Administration and Municipal Court buildings to Shelton Sales and Service in the amounts of $4,743 and $2,970 respectively. To finance the purchase and installations, Mackey recommended transfer of $7,713 from the police salary account to the building and grounds capital outlay account with the balance of $4,352.54 in revenue sharing account 7503 being trans- ferred to the General Fund to reimburse police salaries. Mackey explained that the recommendation was made in order to avoid compliance with wage rate determina- tions. Director Todd, seconded by Noland, moved acceptance of the recommendation. Director Hughes moved to amend the motion to provide that, once the new units are operable, smoking during Board meetings be permitted. The motion was seconded by Colwell and the recorded vote was: Ayes: Hughes, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Henry, Todd, Noland, Malone The motion failed. 99 99.1 99.2 99.3 99.4 99.5 99.6 99.7 99.8 99.9 100 100.1 The Mayor asked if the motion to approve the recommendation should pass. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: Hughes The motion was declared passed. OTHER BUSINESS AIRPORT STUDY 100.2 Director Malone moved the City Manager make a written request to the airport study engineers to complete within 30 days the regional airport study and make the study available to the Airport Study Commission. Director Henry seconded the motion and the recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. CONTINUING EDUCATION CENTER SITE ACQUISITION 100.3 Director Malone reported that the Advertising Promotion Commission had unanimously adopted a motion that the Board of Directors be informed that the Commission was aware of, and approved, the fact that Hotel/Motel/Restaurant one -percent tax receipts would be used for the Continuing Education Center site acquisition. He moved the City Manager forward a letter to the Housing Authority to indicate that funds for the site acquisition will be made avilable from the HMR funds. The motion was seconded by Hughes. The recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. RELOCATION/ACQUISITION AGENT APPOINTED 100.4 The City Manager explained that the Continuing Education Center project would involve relocation and acquisition of occupants and real property. Since the Housing Authority has a staff member who is acquainted with the relocation and acquisition processes, Grimes recommended the Board appoint the Housing Authority as the City's agent in relocation and acquisition matters. Director Malone moved acceptance of the recommendation. The motion was seconded by Noland and the recorded vote was: Ayes: Henry, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster, Colwell Nays: None The motion was declared passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 100.5 Director Todd requested paragraph 80.5 be amended by deleting the first sentence and by amending the third sentence to read: "Malone stated he felt the covenants...". The City Attorney requested amendment to paragraph 87.2 to read: "...for CD program real property acquisitions as required by HUD implemen- ting regulations under the 1970 Real Property Acquisition Act." 100.6 There being no further amendments, the Mayor declared the minutes of the September 20 meeting approved as amended. 100 1 1 1 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for Board consideration, Director Hughes, seconded by Henry, moved the meeting be adjourned. There being no discussion, the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. (V ILO QATTEST Q 1 1 101 APPROVED: 101 101.1