HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-04-05 MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
April 5, 1977
The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville met in a regular session on
April 5, 1977, at 7:30 p.m. in the Director's Room of the City Administration
Building.
u" PRESENT: City Manager Don Grimes, City Attorney Jim McCord, City Clerk Darlene
Westbrook; and Directors Ernest Lancaster, John Todd, Paul Noland, Al
Hughes, David Malone, Philip Colwell, and Marion Orton.
gZ
CZ ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: Members of the audience and representatives of the news media.
CALL TO ORDER AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mayor Ernest Lancaster called the meeting to order. Following a moment of
respectful silence and roll call, the Mayor asked if amendments to minutes of
the March 15, 1977 minutes were necessary.
Director Orton requested the word "propriety" be substituted for the word
"impropriety" appearing in paragraph 363.1, and that paragraph 366.3 be amended
by reflecting April 5 as the proper meeting date. Orton also requested paragraph
364.7 be amended to add: "The City Attorney checked the state statute and the
ordinance passed by the Board and reported that three of the members 'shall be
the Mayor of the city and two members of the Board of Directors of the city
selected by the Board of Directors of the city'." Director Todd requested amend-
ment of paragraph 364.8 to reflect his nomination only of Directors Hughes and
Orton.
There being no further amendments necessary, the Mayor declared the minutes
approved as amended.
LEASH LAW HEARING - Ordinance 2041
Recent events involving the death of afamily pet which had been tranquilized
by a City Animal Enforcement Officer had resulted in controversy regarding the
leash law (Ordinance 2041). Mr. William Bret, representing Mr. and Mrs. John
McGuirk,oWners of the animal involved, had requested to be heard by the Board to
discuss enforcement of the ordinance.
Mr. Bret addressed the Board and questioned the use of the tranquilizing
darts as a safe method of capturing animals for impoundment. Bret posed two
questions for consideration: When may a tranquilizing gun be used? If used,
what effect will its use have?
Bret outlined events involving death of the McGuirk's dog and contended
that the animal's death was the result of misuse of the tranquilizer gun. He
noted that the City of Dallas had adopted a policy that would allow use of the
tranquilizer gun in case of immediate physical or property damage and that the
367
00S
367.1
367.2
367.3
367.4
367.5
367.6
tranquilizing gun was a replacement for conventional guns and were used only if
the officer was prepared to terminate the animal's life. Little Rock, he noted,
had abandoned use of the tranquilizer gun as a means of capturing animals because
results were unpredictable. He contended that the type of tranquilizing drug
employed by Fayetteville is extremely poisonous and is administered by unskilled
and untrained personnel. Bret believed the intent of the impoundment provisions
was being violated since it was intended that tranquilizing drugs or humane animal
traps be used as an aid to capture rather than as an alternative to impoundment.
He requested the Board review the ordinance and prepare new guidelines for enforce-
ment of the impoundment provisions.
368.1 Mr. and Mrs. L. R. Kirby were present in the audience and also related events
which led to the death of their neighbor's dog. Kirby claimed that the McGuirks
had not received notice that their dog had been annoying sanitation crews
and had been asked to confine the dog. They reported that they had never personally
witnessed the dog annoying the sanitation crews and stated that the animal was
quite tame.
368.2 In response to Director Malone, Mr. Bret stated he was not opposed to provisions
of the ordinance requiring confinement of animals, he was, however, concerned about
methods in which the ordiance was being enforced and suggested the Board set new
guidelines and establish restrictions for use of tranquilizer guns.
368.3 The City Manager defended the work of the enforcement officers and pointed
out that they are required to deal with thousands of animals yearly. He noted
that 4,838 animals were impounded during 1976 and that a very small percent of
the cases ever became an issue. He believed that use of the tranquilizer gun was
Justified in cases where other methods of capture were not successful.
368.4 Comments of those present in the audience included those of Ms. Sylvia Scar-
brough who criticized the ordinance for lack of provisions to protect those pet
II/
owners whose pets, though securely confined, managed to escape. She also criti-
cized animal shelter personnel for poor management of the shelter. Mr. William
Dunn suggested the City might utilize nets in capturing animals. Mr. John Carson
questioned authority of control officer to conduct "midnight raids" and for
going upon private property in pursuit of animals running at large. Carson
noted that the control officer's supervisor, the Sanitation Superintendent, carries
a pistol and had, on one occasion, displayed the weapon in an ominous fashion.
The City Manager responded to Carson's comments by explaining that enforcement
officers were, when necessary, dispatched to certain neighborhoods to conduct a
concentrated effort to reduce the number of animals running at large. Grimes
also explained that the Sanitation Superintendent was armed to provide protection
under unusual circumstances and he noted that the superintendent had had threats
of physical harm.
368.5 Mrs. Jerry McGuirk believed the City should use other methods for capturing
animals and suggested the use of nets, ropes, or less effective tranquilizing drugs.
Mr. Robert Ellis spoke in support of the ordinance as written. He recalled that
during consideration of the leash law, discussion resulted concerning authority of
a control officer to go upon private property in pursuit of an animal. The con-
clusion of the discussion, he recalled, was that the officer must have this authority
since he would not be able to determine ownership of the animal merely because it
had retreated to someone's yard. He felt the real problem was that the citizens
of Fayetteville were unwilling to abide by the leash law. Ellis supported use of
the tranquilizing guns but felt a different drug might be used or the dosage decreased.
He requested the Board leave the ordinance intact in order to protect those who do
not own dogs and those who confine their animals; also, that the Board investigate
the administration of the ordinance rather than taking action to amend the ordi-
nance.
368
3 (l. 1)
In other comments from the audience, Mr. James Dawson claimed that the ordi- 369.1
nance was ineffective and that'more animals were running at large than before
adoption of the leash law. Mrs. Eunice Rahtz and Mrs. Anita Buchey commended
the city for their efforts to enforce the ordinance. Mrs. Buchey suggested the
city increase impoundment fees in an attempt to discourage people from letting
their animals run loose. Also in support of the leash law was Mrs. Doreen
Vorsanger who reported that elderly citizens who took leisure strolls in her
neighborhood felt the need to carry large sticks with which to discourage animals
which are not confined.
The Board also heard Mr. Glenn Tanner who told the Board that, as a former
temporary employee of the City, he had witnessed the death of two animals as a re-
sult of tranquilizer darts. He reported that the control officer was required by
his supervisor to meet a quota of 6 captured animals per day.
C1/41 The Mayor then read a memo from the City Manager addressed to the Sanitation 369.3
Superintendent which stated the policy to be applied with regard to use of the
tranquilizing gun in capturing animals which are running at large. The memo read:
m
369.2
"If an animal is obviously at large and the owner can be iden-
tified but not located immediately, the animal is not to be tran-
quilized at that time. However, the owner is to be located and a
summons issued immediately for permitting the animal to run at large.
If, on any day following the issuance of the. summons -,to the owner,
T the animal is again found running at large and the owner cannot be
immediately contacted, the use of the tranquilizer gun to capture
the animal will be permitted. This will, of course, only apply in
those cases where the animal control officer is unable to capture
the animal by other means."
Mr. Bret stated he preferred the tranquilizing guns be reserved for use 369.4
when the control officer is confronted with a rabid or vicious animal or when an
animal threatens immediate physical or property damage. He felt the ordinance
was too broad and that the abuses of discretion might overshadow the ordinance's
intent. Mr. Kirby felt the new policy would be an effective temporary measure
but that the ordinance needed to be revised to provide protection for people
who do not own pets.
Director Malone suggested that interested citizens submit proposed .changes
to the leash law which they feel might improve the -leash law in-regdrds to the
use of tranquilizing guns and administration of enforcement provisions. The
proposed changes could then be reviewed by the Board for possible adoption.
The Board took no action following completion of the hearing. 369.6
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY - R77-5 / E. J. Ball,Petitioner / Highways 265 & 45 East
The City Attorney read a proposed ordinance to rezone a 52 acre tract located 369.7
located at the northwest corner of Highway 45 East and Highway 265 from R-1 Low
Density Residential to R-2 Medium Density Residential, R-0 Residential Office, and
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial.
Director Hughes, seconded by Noland, moved rules be suspended and the ordi- 369.8
nance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
369.5
369
370.1 Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be further suspended and
the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
370.2 Mr. Jim Lindsey, representing the petitioner, presented the rezoning plan
to the Board and stated that the plan was in compliance with land use plans adopted
by the Board for the Highway 265 corridor.
370.3 Director Orton stated that she hoped the Planning Commission would not ex-
tend the proposed boundaries for commercial use beyond the recommended four corners
of the intersection. Director Malone felt the rezoning would relieve pressures
for additional commercial in other locations. Director Noland expressed encourage-
ment that the entire tract was rezoned under one petition.
370.4 There being no further discussion or public opposition expressed, the Mayor
asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 23E APPEARS ON PAGE 2200F ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY - R77-4 / Fayetteville Housing Authority, Petitioner
East Side Square
370.5 The City Attorney read a proposed ordinance which would rezone property located
on the East side of the downtown square from C-3 Central Commercial to C-4 Downtown.
Property involved in the petition included all or parts of lots 2, 3, and 4 of
Block 30; lots 6 and 7 of Block 26; and lots 7, 8, 9, 10. 11, 12, and 13 of Block
28; all in the Original Town Plat.
370.6 Director Hughes, seconded by Malone, moved rules be suspended and the ordinance
placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nasy: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
370.7 Director Hughes, seconded by Noland, moved rules be further suspended and the
ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
370.8 Mr. Chad Kumpe, representing Fayetteville Housing Authority, stated that the
rezoning would eliminate necessity for several variance requests in conjunction
with construction of proposed buildings. Director Malone preferred that the
Planning Commission recommend an entire area of C-4 zoning rather than having the
Board consider each rezoning on an individual basis.
370.9 Director Colwell pointed out lesser parking requirements of the C-4 zoning
classification and noted that the requirements might be waived under certain
circumstances. He noted that a $500 cash payment per required space in lieu of
providing parking space would not be sufficient to pay for construction of one
space.
370.10 The Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: Colwell
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2317 APPEARS ON PAGE 222 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
379
1
APRIL- 5, 1977
371
Director Malone, seconded ,by Noland, moved that the Board request a study of
the entire downtown area by the Planning Commission to determine if other properties
in the area should be rezoned C-4. Director Orton stated she shared Colwell's
concern and preferred that parking requirements of the C-4 zoning classification
also be reviewed to determine whether the requirements are sufficient. Malone
amended his motion to provide that the Planning Commission would also review the
parking requirements. Noland's second to the motion stood. The recorded vote
was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
371.1
SIGN APPEAL - 2722 North College / Daniel B. Thomas, Petitioner / Good Earth Realty
14
d' The petitioner had requested a variance to allow a larger sign to be 371.2
;Z located at the minimum setbackfrom street right-of-way. The petitioner was not
'a present to state his appeal; therefore, Director Malone moved the appeal be tabled.
CZ
The motion died for lack of second.
Director Orton, who noted that the sign ordinance provided for larger signs
at greater setbacks, moved the variance be denied. She stated she could see no
reason why the petitioner could not erect a sign in compliance with the sign ordi-
nance. The motion to deny the variance was seconded by Director Todd. The re-
corded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the variance denied.
ORDINANCE CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION - Tourist Tax
371.3
Petitions were filed with the City Clerk on March 31 requesting a referen- 371.4
dum be called for Ordinance 2310 which levies a one percent hotel, motel, and
restaurant gross receipts sales tax. The City Attorney reported that the City
Clerk had verified that the petitions contained 512 valid signatures and that the
petitions were therefore sufficient for the Board to call an election on the
matter. The City Attorney then read an ordinance setting the date of the election
as May 3, 1977.
Director Malone, seconded by Orton, moved rules be suspended and the ordi- 371.5
nance placed'on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be further suspended and the 371.6
ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
Following slight discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should piss. The 371.7
recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2318 APPEARS ON PAGE 223 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
371
4
ORDINANCE AMENDING MOBILE HOME PARK ORDINANCE
372.1 A proposed ordinance had been considered at the March 15 meeting which would
prescribe minimum lot dimensions for lots within mobile home parks which are
intended to be sold to private individuals. During the discussion, the Board
concurred that an ordinance should also be drafted which would guarantee maintenance
of required recreational facilities in the event the park developer sells the lots
to individual owners.
372.2 Mr. Marshall Carlisle presented the Board with an ordinance which he had
drafted. The ordinance would require that the park developer place into the deed
of transfer of lots a letter of restrictive covenants requiring maintenance of
recreational facilities by property owners after 50 percent of the total area
within the park had been sold. Director Malone felt the ordinance should provide
that the restrictive covenant be in favor of the City of Fayetteville and other
property owners. The Board concurred that the covenant should provide that all
owners of any lot would be a party of the covenant and that the covenants would be
made a part of the transfer of title prior to the sale of any lots.
372.3 Following a brief consultation between the City Attorney and Mr. Carlisle,
the City Attorney read a proposed ordinance which would provide that maintenance of
recreational areas and facilities shall be the responsibility to whom the mobile
home park permit is issued provided, prior to sale of any lot, the owner shall
cause to be included with the transfer of title of each lot a restrictive covenant
that all owners be collectively responsible for maintenance and upkeep of recrea-
tional areas after 50 percent or more of the total area of the mobile home park
had been sold. The proposed ordinance also specified that the restrictive
covenant has to be included with the transfer of title prior to sale of a lot.
372.4 Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be suspended and the ordinance
placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
372.5 Director Hughes, seconded by Orton, moved rules be further suspended and the
ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
372.6 Mayor Lancaster questioned whether streets within the mobile home park would
be included as a part of the total area of the park. The Board discussed at
length the fact that most streets within the parks, though constructed to city
standard, remained private thoroughfares that did not require city maintenance.
In order to guarantee that streets were properly maintained once lots were sold
individually, it was suggested that the mobile home park ordinance might be amend-
ed to require dedication to the city of mobile home park streets. It was noted,
however, that at the time the mobile home park ordinance was considered, the park
operators had requested the streets remain private so that they might impose their
own traffic regulations or to install speed breakers.
372.7 There being no further comments, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE N0. 2319 APPEARS ON PAGE 225 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
372
1
3
ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING:., ORDINANCE - Mobile Home Lot Widths
The City Attorney read a proposed ordinance prescribing minimum lot widths 373.1
for mobile home park lots intended for sale to individual owners. Director
Hughes, seconded by Malone, moved rules be suspended and the ordinance placed
on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be further suspended and
the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
C1 The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
Director Orton preferred that the minimum lot width be established as 60 feet 373.2
to comply with requirements of subdivision lots. She envisioned that, at some time
in the future, an owner might desire to erect a permanent dwelling on a mobile home
lot which he had purchased. Or, if the mobile home park should cease to exist,
the lots would be of sufficient width to allow conversion to a subdivision. Mr.
Carlisle stated that the purpose of the ordinance was to provide a means for lower
income people to own their own lot and home. Carlisle cautioned that, by increasing
lot size requirements, the cost of a lot would also be increased. It was also noted
that the proposed ordinance stipulated that no single-family, two-family, or
multi -family dwelling could be erected unless the structure and lot complies with
all requirements of the zoning classification including the requirement that the
structure would have to front a public street.
There being no further discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should 373.3
pass. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2320 APPEARS ON PAGE 226 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
TAXI SERVICE REPORT
Included with the agenda was a report to the Directors from the City Manager
regarding taxi services. Noting that the operators had significantly improved
the operation, the report concluded that the staff did not feel the few minor
problems which remain did not warrant revoking the certificate.o.f convenience
issued to the Fayetteville Transportation Company.
Director Noland agreed that the appearance of the taxi vehicles seemed
to have improved. In regard to rates charged, the Administrative Assistant
reported that he had experienced an equal amount of overcharges and undercharges
and did not feel that improper rate charges were a significant problem. Director
Todd believed that citizens who wish to complain about cab service should have
someone to direct his comlaints to. He suggested that the city publish an annual
notice, prior to renewal of the taxi permit, which would invite the public to
submit any comments they might have regarding the type of service provided.
Director Orton expressed hope that the city would be looking for someone who might
establish better quality cab service.
Director Hughes, seconded by Colwell, moved the report be accepted. The
recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
373
373.4
373.5
373.6
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENTS - Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program
374.1 The proposed resolution would approve establishment of a loan program
for Community Development program Housing Rehabilitation purposes to quali-
fied borrowers, and would authorize agreements with Mcllroy, First National, and
Northwest National banks under which they would serve as agents for the loans
at a cost of three percent to the borrower. The CD program would pay the balance
of interest charges.
374.2 Mr. Charles Hoffman, CD Administrator, reported that the banks, during the
initial year, did not wish to lend their own money on which the CD program would
pay the balance of interest charges. Director Hughes favored placing full
responsibility of the loan process upon the lending institutions. Hoffman
stated that the bankswere initially approached to assume full responsibility but
declined since they felt this type of loan program involved an area of finance
which experienced higher risk factors. When asked if the City could place monies
in reserve as security for the loans, Hoffman stated that HUD regulations would
not allow a reserve fund. Hoffman noted that the maximum loan term would be
15 years and that the City would be committed even should the CD program ceases
to exist during that period. Hoffman explained that the three percent fee charged
to the borrower would go into an account established for the City and would offset
interest charges. Vendor services and materials would be paid for in accordance
with established City procedures, he said. Changes to the agreements which
Hoffman felt were necessary were the provision for a representative of Fayetteville
Savings and Loan Association to serve on the Steering Committee and to provide for
availability of legal counsel.
374.3 The City Manager stated he had hoped the lending institutions would assume
complete charge of the loan program with establishment of a City escrow fund to
provide loan security until the program's success could be analyzed. Malone
felt the institutions should be contacted for purposes of renegotiating the agree-
ment. Director Hughes preferred that the City Attorney provide legal counsel for
the Steering Committee. Hoffman also requested that a section be added to the
agreement to provide for annual execution and review of the agreements.
374.4 Following discussion, Director Todd moved adoption of the resolution. The
motion died for lack of second. Director Malone, seconded by Orton moved the
resolution be tabled until the April 19 meeting to allow further consideration
and negotiation. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
FIRE STATION LOCATION - Eastern Fayetteville
374.5 Director Todd had requested the Board consider selection of a site for construc-
tion of a temporary fire station to serve the eastern portion of the city. In order
to provide service to all of the eastern portion without building two stations or
without allowing any one area to be lacking sufficient fire protection, the City
Manager and Fire Chief had recommended the construction of a fire station on
Highway 265 midway between Highways 45 and 16 East. The recommendation also in-
cluded that the structure be designed so as to allow its conversion at a later
date into a private residence which the city could sell and regain a portion of
the original investment. The recommendation had been discussed at an October, 1976
meeting but failed to receive majority approval of the Board. The City Manager
stated that the recommendation remained unchanged.
374
375
Director Hughes believed that a temporary facility would probably become 375.1
permanent and felt the proposed site would not be of benefit except to the
Hyland Park Subdivision. He mentioned that the public schools had offered to
donate land for the facility if it were located near the proposed site of a
new school on 45 East.
Fire Chief Charles McWhorter noted that a portion of the Mount Sequoyah 375.2
area, which currently lies outside any four -minute response area, could be
served by the station at the proposed site. He also clarified that the school
system had not indicated which parcel they would be willing to donate. McWhorter
cited lack of sufficient funds to construct and equip two stations and that the
recommended facility would provide service for the Highway 45 East area as well
as the Highway 16 East area.
Mr. Bill Schwabb, representing the Sequoyah Woods Homeowner's Association, 375.3
expressed the Association's favor of the proposed station which would serve
T' a fast growing and potentially higher valued subdivision as well as a proposed
school facility.
Mr. Morris Collier favored the location of a permanent station on Highway 375.4
CO 16 East and noted that residents of the 16 East area had been promised several
years ago that a station would be located in that area. He felt the investment
of taxpayer's money in a temporary facility would be unwise. Mr. Elvie Heiney,
Baldwin, also favored a Highway 16 East location and agreed with Collier that
a permanent, not temporary, structure should be erected at a site which would
either serve the Highway 45 East area or the Highway 16 East area.
Mr. Roy Clinton and Mr. Jack Ray both supported the City Manager's recommen- 375.5
dation as the best method in which to serve both areas. The City Manager clarified
that, even though the insurance rating bureau had stated the need for the addi-
tional station to serve eastern Fayetteville, the city's growth pattern in the
eastern areas had not yet developed. Director Colwell noted that Mr. Jim Lindsey,
owner of property near the proposed site, notified him that he did not object to
the location of a fire station at the site. Director Orton suggested that the
administrative staff might pursue a suggestion that firemen living in the Highway
16 East area might be equipped to provide supplementary fire protection.
Director Colwell, seconded by Orton, moved to proceed to locate the station 375.6
on Highway 265 across from Hyland Park Subdivision as recommended. The recorded
vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: Hughes
The motion was declared passed.
RESOLUTION COMMENDING RETIRING FIRE CHIEF
The City Attorney read a resolution commending retiring Fire Chief Charles 375.7
McWhorter for his contributions and service to the Fayetteville Fire Department
for 24 years. Director Orton, seconded by Malone, moved adoption of the resolu-
tion. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 138 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
375
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR PAVING OF UNPAVED STREETS
376.1 Director Hughes reported that the Street Committee had not met as planned
since the proposed ordinance seemed clear in its provisions. The proposed
ordinance, read the first time by the City Attorney, would establish policies
for the paving of unpaved city streets.
376.2 Director Orton felt the ordina a should stipulate that developers would
add additional improvements as uni roved land is developed. Director Orton,
seconded by Hughes, moved the ordi nce be amended to provide that, when a subdivision
or large scale development adjace t to a street improved according to ordinance,
it is intended that the develope will bring his side of the street to full city
street standards including provislion of proper right-of-way. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, No1ad, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed. \,
376.3 In response to Director Malone, the City Manager believed the policy would
apply to Juneway Terrace when that street becomes a through street. Grimes stated
that the city had recently acquired a parcel of property which would allow the
opening of the street. Director Orton cautioned that the original intent was that
the ordinance would apply to unpaved streets currently existing in undeveloped areas.
376.4 Director Todd moved the ordinance be amended to provide that any labor not
already employed or equipment not already owned by the city will be paid entirely
by the property owners; that the allocation and financing of property owner's cost
would be completely independent of the city; and that city participation in the
street projects undertaken under provisions of the oridnance would not interfere
with normal construction and/or maintenance operations of the city street department
as contained in the city budget. The motion was seconded by Director Malone and
the recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
376.5 Following further discussion, Director Hughes, seconded by Malone, moved rules
be suspended and the ordinance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
376.6 Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be further suspended and the
ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
376.7 There being no further discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should
pass. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2321 APPEARS ON PAGE 227 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
OFF-STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ONE - Appointment of Board of Assessment
376.8 Mr. Rick Osborne and Mr. Chad Kumpe were present to report to the Board
the status of the Off Street Parking Improvement District One.
376
14
Kumpe informed that the district was in the process of acquiring eight
parcels of property, three of which are currently used as parking lots, with
which to provide 178 new parking spaces. Expected expenses of the district
were reported to be:
Land Acquisition
Demolition
First Year Interest
Appraisals, Assessors
Administrative
Paving
$316,750
10,000
30,000
37,000
25,000
31,250
TOTAL $450,000
CU
p7
377.1
et The City Attorney read a resolution to appoint a Board of Assessment to con- 377.2
sist of Chad Kumpe, Keith Schultz, and Carl Collier. Director Hughes, seconded by
DO
Malone, moved adoption of the resolution. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
Abstain: Colwell
Director Colwell stated he abstained from voting hecause he has family interests
in two of the:Wce 1` considered fbr.purchase by the district. The Mayor declared
the resolution passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 25-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 139 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
ENERGY CONSERVATION
Director Orton noted that the Board had adopted Resolution 12-77 concerning 377.3
energy conservation for the city. Since energy conservation is a current issue,
she felt the city should emphasize what the city is doing to conserve energy and
should also receive suggestions from citizens and citizen committees regarding
energy conservation measures.
She moved the Board conduct a public meeting on April 26, 7:30 p.m., at a 377.4
location to be announced, for the purpose of discussing with the public the
energy problems and for receiving citizen input. Director Todd seconded the
motion. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 75-1 - Dissolution
The Board of Commissioners of Fayetteville Sewer Improvement District 75-1 377.5
had requested the Board to dissolve the district. The City Attorney read an ordi-
nance to dissolve the district.
Director Orton, seconded by Colwell, moved rules be suspended and the ordi- 377.6
nance read the second time. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the!motion passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
Director Colwell, seconded by Malone, moved rules be further suspended and 377.7
the ordinance read the third and final time. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
377
378.1 There being no discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The
recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2322 APPEARS ON PAGE 229 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - Conditional Use Permits
378.2 The City Attorney read an ordinance providing that no application for a
conditional use permit will be considered by the Planning Commission within twelve
months following denial.
378.3 Director Orton, seconded by Colwell, moved rules be suspended and the ordi-
nance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
378.4 Director Colwell, seconded by Lancaster, moved rules be further suspended and
the ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance read the third and final time.
378.5 The Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2323 APPEARS ON PAGE 230 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
ORDINANCE PRESCRIBING NEW EXPIRATION DATES FOR CITIZENS COMMITTEES
378.6 The Board Nominating Committee had recommended the establishment of new
expiration dates for citizen committee memberships in an effort to avoid necessity
for making numerous appointments at any one time. The City Attorney read a proposed
ordinance to specifiy the following membership expiration dates:
Board of Adjustment
Board of Housing and Construction Appeals
Electrical Licensing Board
Fayetteville Housing Authority
Library Board of Trustees
Municipal Parking Authority
Pollution Control Committee
April 1
April 1
October 1
July 1
April 1
April 1
October 1
378.7 Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be suspended and the ordi-
nance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
378.8 Director Malone, seconded by Hughes, moved rules be further suspended and
the ordinance read the third and final time. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
378
There being no discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The Mayor declared the ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE N0. 2324 APPEARS ON PAGE 231 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
379
379.1
ORDINANCE AMENDING ELECTRICAL LICENSING BOARD MEMBERSHIP PROVISIONS
The ordinance, read by the City Attorney, would provide that membership of 379.2
the Electrical Licensing Board would consistof one master electrician' and three
persons who are at least journeyman electricians. The amendment would provide
SQ the Board with more flexibility when making appointments to the body.
CI' Director Todd, seconded by Noland, moved the rules be suspended and the 379.3
ordinance placed on second reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
CO Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the second time.
Director Todd, seconded by Noland, moved rules be further suspended and the 379.4
ordinance placed on third and final reading. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed and the ordinance was read the third and final time.
There being no discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. 379.5
' The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The ordinance was declared passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2325 APPEARS ON PAGE 232 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
BOARD OF HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION APPEAL
- Director Todd', seconded by Hughes, moved that Robert C. Ellis be appointed
to fill the term of Kenneth Ball which expires April 1, 1978. There being no
additional nominations, the Mayor asked if the motion should pass. The recorded
vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
379.6
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
Director Todd reported that the Nominating Committee recommended the appoint- 379.7
ment of Ginger Parker of Walter Losey to a term on the Civil Service Commission
to expire April 1, 1983. The Board proceeded to vote for the nominee of their
choice. The recorded vote was:
Ginger Parker: Orton, Todd, Noland, Malone
Walter Losey: Colwell, Hughes, Lancaster
Ms. Parker was declared the appointee
379
ELECTRICAL LICENSING BOARD
380.1 Director Todd moved that John Lindsay be appointed to a 17 -month term
expiring November 1, 1978; that Tom Campbell be appointed to a term expiring
October 1, 1979; that Delano Cotton be appointed as alternate to expire
November 1, 1978; and that Bert Rakes be appointed as an alternate to expire
October 1, 1979. It was noted that the terms would be for slightly longer
periods to compensate for the newly adopted ordinance regarding new expiration
dates. Director Orton noted that two nominees were employed by the same
electrical company and Director Todd replied that one was nominated as an
alternate. There being no further nominations, Director Noland seconded the
motion and the recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: Orton
The motion was declared passed.
INDUSTRIAL PARK COMMITTEE
380.2 Director Todd, seconded by Hughes, moved nomination of Bill McLeod to fill an
unexpired term ending April 1, 1978; and of Don Trumbo and Bruce Armstrong for
terms expiring April 1, 1982. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
MUNICIPAL PARKING AUTHORITY
380.3 Director Todd reported the nomination of W. C. Morton for a term to expire
April 1, 1982 and of Bill Conrad for a term to expire April I, 1979. Director
Orton nominated Ellen Halpern for a term to expire April 1, 1979. The Mayor
asked if the nomination of Morton, moved by Todd and seconded by Hughes, should
be accepted. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
380.4 The Mayor then requested a vote for the remaining nominees. The recorded vote
was:
Ms. Halpern: Orton, Todd, Malone
Mr. Conrad: Colwell, Noland, Hughes, Lancaster
The Mayor declared Mr. Conrad as the appointee.
POLLUTION CONTROL AND ENERGY COMMISSION
380.5 Director Todd, seconded by Hughes, moved nomination of Kenneth Pummill to
fill the unexpired term of William Smiley expiring October 1, 1979. The recorded
vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
NOMINATING COMMITTEE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
380.6 Director Todd introduced proposed Board Nominating Committee policies and pro-
cedures for Board approval. Director Orton noted that an objective outlined within
the proposed policies was that a broad cross section of qualified individuals
for service on the appointed bodies would be provided and she questioned whether
that would include females as well as males. Director Todd indicated that the
380
policies were applicable regardless of sex. He noted that the Nominating
Committee had not considered whether appointments to Board committees should
follow the same procedures since they felt that was a Board decision.
Director Malone, seconded by Orton, moved the policies be adopted with
the addition of statement of criteria to be used in the selection of
appointees for various boards and commissions.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PROPERTY CONDEMNATION- Gregg, North, and Garland Streets
38i
381.1
N The City Attorney read a resolution to authorize condemnation proceedings 381.2
d' for acquisition of right-of-way for the Gregg Avenue and for the North Street/
Q Garland Street improvement projects. Director Hughes, seconded by Noland, moved
adoption of the resolution. The recorded vote was:
CZ Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd., Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion Was declared passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 26-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 140 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY - North Street
The City Attorney read a resolution authorizing the sale of 3,214 square
feet of city owned property south of North Street and West of Lindell Street
to Sterling P. and Kay Z. Anders at a purchase price of $1,225.00 The City
Attorney informed the Board that the property was a portion of a parcel purchased
by the city for the North Street extension project and that the unused portion
was not practical for sale to anyone but the abutting property owners.
Director Hughes, seconded by Noland, moved adoption of the resolution. The
recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 27-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 141 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
OTHER BUSINESS
JOINT MEETING WITH AIRPORT STUDY COMMITTEE
The City Manager reported that the Airport Study Committee wished to meet
jointly with the Fayetteville City Board and the Springdale City Council on
April 18, 1977 at a location to be announced at a later date.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT OPTION
The City Attorney reported that Mr. Gordon Cummings had filed litigation
alleging that the City's proposed execution of an option to renew the current
sanitarylandfill contract with Sunray Sanitation would be illegal; also, that
Cummings had requested a temporary injunction to restrain the execution of the
option.andia hearing on the petition ?or the temporary injunction was -scheduled
for April 7. He then read a resolution tp;AutbQfliecg5eCVdtiQQaby the City Manager,
381
381.3
381.4
381.5
381.6
382.1
of the contract option to renew the contract for a one year period and that the
authorization be effective after April 7, 1977.
Director Hughes, seconded by Colwell, moved adoption of the resolution.
The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland,Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 28-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 142 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
382.2 The Board discussed the need for facilities at which Fayetteville citizens
could dump brush and items not picked up by city sanitation crews. Director
Orton recalled that the owner of Sunray landfill had assured he would provide
such a facility for the Fayetteville citizens. Director Malone suggested the
city staff contact the operator of the landfill and request that he work towards
providing the facilities.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GRANTING OF EASEMENT - Southwestern Electric Power Company
382.3 The City Attorney read a resolution to grant an easement to SWEPCO to allow
the installation of a transformer pad to be located west of the alley abutting
the eastern side of the parking lot west of Block Street between Mountain and
Center Streets. Director Noland, seconded by Colwell, moved adoption of the
resolution. The recorded vote was:
Ayes: Colwell, Orton, Todd, Noland, Hughes, Malone, Lancaster
Nays: None
The motion was declared passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 29-77 APPEARS ON PAGE 143 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V
ELECTION COSTS
382.4 Director Hughes inquired as to the source of funds to pay for the tourist
tax election costs which he estimated would be about $2,500. The City Manager
stated that an election expense item was not budgeted for 1977 but that the
funds would come from the General Fund. Hughes felt the public should realize
where the funds would come from and felt the Finance Committee should review
the budget.
MISCELLANEOUS
382.5 Mr. Jerry Rephan questioned expenditure of funds to purchase right-of-way
for additional street projects when the city needs funds to provide enforcement
personnel for Highway 71 Bypass and for Highway 265. The City Manager stated
that three additional patrolmen would be hired shortly due to receipt of a
grant.
ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
382.6 Director Malone requested that the Board be adjourned into executive session
to discuss a personnel matter. The Board concurred and the Mayor adjourned the
meeting.
APPROVED: Y"{Gwe
ERNEST E. LANCASTER, Mayor
ATTEST.d
DARLENE WESTBROOK, City Clerk
382