Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-09-18 Minutesr MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS September 16, 1975 The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas met in a regular session on September 16, 1975 at 7:30 p.m. in the Director's Room of the City Administration Building. PRESENT: City Manager Donald L. Grimes; Administrative Assistant David McWethy; City Attorney Jim McCord; City Clerk Darlene Westbrook; and Directors Marion Orton, Ernest Lancaster, John Todd, Paul ut Noland, Al Hughes, Russell Purdy, and Morris Collier. N ABSENT: None it OTHERS PRESENT: Members of the audience and representatives of the news media. CALL TO ORDER AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES The meeting was called to order by Mayor Orton. Following a brief moment of respectful silence, the Mayor asked if there be any corrections to the minutes of the special meeting held August 28, 1975. Director Collier requested that paragraph 352.6 be amended to read. "...I want the people to know exactly how the police and fire departments are going to be hurt..." Mayor Orton requested that paragraph 352.7 be amended to read: "...whose chief co-ordinators are..." These amendments meeting with the approval of the Board and there being no further amend- ments, the minutes were approved as amended. The Mayor then asked if there were any amendments necessary to the minutes of the regular meeting of September 2, 1975. There being none, the minutes were approved as submitted. 1.1 1.2 1.3 REQUEST FROM ACORN - Vacant Lots Representatives of Arkansas Community Organization for Reform Now 1.4 (ACORN) were present in the audience to present their request that the city take action to enforce the City Code pertaining to vacant lots to remedy unsightly conditions of several overgrown and littered vacant lots in the southeast section of Fayetteville. Residents of the area had formed a group entitled South East Fayetteville Community Organization (SEFCO) which was represented by Reverend J L. Thompson. In a prepared speech, Reverend Thompson requested that the city enforce the city's ordi- nance and order that vacant lots overgrown with weeds and harboring insects and rodents be cleaned and health hazards alleviated. Reverend Thompson stated that such action would not cost the city any money since the cost of cleaning the various properties could be recovered from the property owners. The City Manager explained the city policy regarding vacant lots, stating 1.5 that lots in a natural state were not required to be cleared. Building Inspector Chuck Hoffman said that criteria used in enforcing the ordinance might possibly need to be reviewed. Mr. Hoffman informed the group that action had been initiated to correct some of the situations involving vacant lots that were enumerated by SEFCO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - Wyman/Stone Bridge Sewer 2.1 At its last meeting the Board had approved a resolution authorizing condemnation of right-of-way for the Wyman -Stone Bridge Road sewer line for the portion west of Stone Bridge Road. Condemnation of properties belonging to Mrs. Mamie Atkison and Mr. William Bradley were delayed pending notification of all property owners of the area so that those property owners favoring installation of sewer service might appear before the Board. At the September 2 meeting, Mr. Atkison had contended that the extension of sewer service east of Stone Bridge Road would not benefit anyone. 2.2 Mr. W. D. Drake, a property owner of the area, was present in the audience and stated that he favored the sewer line for the portion east of Stone Bridge Road. Mr. Bill Skelton, another property owner present in the audience, told the Board that he did not believe the sewer project should be deleted because of objections of two property owners. He told the Board of health hazards created by seepage from septic tanks in the area. Director Collier stated that he had personally inspected the area and reported that he had viewed raw sewage draining across the roadway and that the sewer line installation would be necessary to correct the situation. 2.3 Mr. Lester Atkison, speaking in behalf of Mamie Atkison, stated that "...we do not want to deny any of our neighbors any privileges or improve- ments. As far as going across our property, we feel we should be reim- bursed." Mr. Atkison informed the Board that four utility easements traversed his property, one of which facilitates a 36 inch city sewer line. 2.4 Mrs. William Bradley then told the Board that a city official had not yet contacted her husband in regard to the easement. Mr. Johnny Oliver, a resident of the area, stated that he had personally contacted Mr. Bradley in behalf of the city and that Mr. Bradley had stated that he was not interested in granting the easement. Mrs. Bradley replied that her husband had not been advised as to how much land the easement would involve nor where the easement would be located. 2.5 Mr. Atkison informed the Board that he had given the city a proposal which was presented to the city by Mr. Neal Albright. He said that he thoughthisproposal had been a fair one but that all the city could offer in return for the easement was the clearing of brush from the easement site. Director Collier was of the opinion that the city would be doing a great service by clearing the brush from the property. In answer to a question from Director Noland, City Engineer Paul Mattke stated that the sewer easement would not deprive the owners of the use of their property because of its close location to the roadway. 2.6 Discussion completed, the City Attorney read the resolution after which Director Hughes, seconded by Director Collier, moved that the reso- lution be adopted. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": None The resolution was declared adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 76-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 1 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V 2 1 • 1 1 1 RECEIPT OF PETITIONS - Dickson Street Beautification 111 Property owners and merchants of Dickson Street had presented the Board with petitions supporting a proposed beautification and improvement project for Dickson Street. Mrs. Juanita Carlson was present in the audience to speak in behalf of the petition and answer questions from the Board. Director Collier.informed the Board that the group had appointed a nominating committee to recommend a slate of officers to be voted upon by property owners and merchants of Dickson Street. After election of officers they would choose a course of action to accomplish their goals. Following discussion, Mayor Orton acknowledged receipt of the at: petitions. CA t' ORDINANCE AMENDING MAJOR STREET PLAN - Cleburn Street The proposed ordinance would amend the Major Street Plan as it applies to the 400 block of West Cleburn Street as requested by Mr. Kenneth Smith who proposes to construct a house at 459 West Cleburn. The request was tabled at the September 2, 1975 meeting pending further study by the Board. Director Collier, who had inspected the property, reported that waiver of the street plan would permit future homes to be constructed so as to align with an existing house at the corner of the street. Director Purdy was of the opinion that the Board would be waiving the plan to accommodate someone who did not want to build in accordance with required setbacks. However, he stated that he believed the street plan seemed "a little ridiculous" because Cleburn Street would not likely be- come a through street. Upon completion of discussion, the City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time. Director Collier, seconded by Director Hughes, motioned to suspend rules and place the ordinance on second reading. In roll call vote of the Board the motion carried unanimously and the ordinance was read the second time. Director Hughes, seconded by Director Collier, motioned to further suspend rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. In roll call vote of the Board the motion carried unani- mously and the ordinance was read the third time. There being no further discussion, Mayor Orton asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": None The ordinance was declared passed. ORDINANCE N0. 2145 APPEARS ON PAGE 1 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V APPEAL FOR SIGN VARIANCE - Consumers. Market The appeal regarded a proposed sign for Consumers Market to be located at 3340 North College which is zoned C-2 Thoroughfare Commercial. The area of the sign proposed by the petitioner would be 466 square feet for a free-standing sign instead of the maximum 75 square feet allowed by the sign ordinance. In addition they requested a variance for a wall 3 r 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 sign 532 square feet in area which exceeded the maximum 150 square foot allowed by the sign ordinance. 4.1 Mr. David Glass was present in the audience to represent Consumers Market in their request for variance. Mr. Glass informed the Board that the signs which his company proposed to erect were standard signs used throughout the country by his company and that the size of the signs was necessary to provide proper identification of their business. He felt that the city's ordinance did not take into consideration the size of a building or the building's setback. The request for a variance in wall sign size was, Mr. Glass felt, necessary to compensate for the building's 400 foot setback and the larger free-standing sign was neces- sary to accommodate the word "Consumers". 4.2 Director Collier commented that he thought the request had helped the Board to see that the sign ordinance needed revision and that he believed the sign ordinance to be a hindrance to businesses in Fayetteville. 4.3 Director Purdy stated that he felt there were three questions before the Board: 1) could the free-standing sign be erected; 2) if so, could the free-standing sign be larger than 75 square feet; and, 3) should the wall sign be allowed to be larger than 150 square feet. Director Purdy suggested that each question be considered individually. Director Hughes motioned that the variance request be granted for the wall sign and Director Collier seconded the motion. Both the motion and the second were subsequently withdrawn. 4.4 As a practicality, Director Purdy felt that the petitioner should be entitled to a free-standing sign even though the ordinance technically would not allow it. He then motioned that the free-standing sign be allowed. The motion was seconded by Director Collier. Mr. Glass stated that should the free-standing sign be approved, he would not be adverse to making it a joint sign to be used by other businesses at the location. In roll call vote of the Board the motion carried unanimously. 4.5 Director Purdy then moved that the free-standing sign be limited to the maximum size allowed by ordinance. Director Todd seconded the motion. Director Hughes was of the opinion that the business needed a larger sign and Director Collier felt that a nationally accepted sign should be accepted in Fayetteville. Director Todd felt that the business should be required to comply with the sign ordinance just as existing Fayetteville businesses have complied. Director Purdy felt that as long as the city sign ordinance limited free-standing signs to 75 square feet, signs at the standard distance should comply with the ordinance or the ordinance should be changed. Following slight further comment, the Mayor asked if Purdy's motion should pass. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Orton, Purdy, Lancaster "Nays": Hughes, Collier The motion was declared passed. 4.6 Director Purdy then motioned that the appeal for the wall sign be granted. At this point, discussion became heated and Director Hughes, indicating that he would vote favorably for the motion, left the room. Mayor Orton advised Director Hughes that the vote on the motion was not ready to be taken. Director Collier stated that he would leave also but that there was another important item on the agenda to be considered. Discussion completed, the Mayor asked if the motion should pass. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Ayes": Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": Todd, Noland, Orton Absent: Hughes The motion was declared failed Ut. N e . CC I • Director Collier told Mr. Glass that he was very sorry the request was denied and said he wound "try to muster support from the business community to get that ordinance amended within the next two weeks for you." ORDINANCE APPROVING LARGE SCALE DEVELOPMENT - Ozark Bowling Lanes The proposed ordinance would approve the proposed large scale develop- ment plan of Ozark Bowling Lanes located at 2300 North College to allow an expansion of existing facilities. The ordinance would be contingent upon compliance with parking regulations or receipt of a variance in parking requirements from the Board of Adjustment. The City Attorney read the ordinance for the first time after which Director Noland, seconded by Director Todd, motioned to suspend rules and place the ordinance on second reading. In roll call vote of the Board the motion passed with Director Collier abstaining and Director Hughes absent. Director Noland, seconded by Director Purdy, moved to further suspend rules and place the ordinance on third and final reading. In roll call vote of the Board the motion carried with Director Hughes absent. The ordinance was read the third and final time. Following slight discussion, the Mayor asked if the ordinance should pass. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": None Abstain: Hughes The ordinance was declared passed. ORDINANCE NO. 2146 APPEARS ON PAGE 2 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GRANT APPLICATION - Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (BOR) The City Attorney read a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an application for Bureau of Outdoor Recreation funds to be used for park development. The particular project to be funded would include installation of lighting for Lake Fayetteville Park softball field, construction of two lighted tennis courts at Root Park, and installation of lighting for the Asbell Park softball field. Director Hughes questioned the City Manager about the availability of matching funds and Mr. Grimes replied that he understood the matching funds were budgeted in the Community Development program. Mr. Chuck Hoffman, administrator of the CD program, assured the Board that the matching funds were budgeted in the CD budget. Director Noland, seconded by Director Todd, moved that the resolution be adopted. In roll call vote of the Board the following vote was recorded: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": None The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 77-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 2 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF -ASSURANCE OF,COMPLIANC.E STATEMENT' In conjunction with the application for BOR park development grant funds, the City Attorney advised that the federal government required the execu- tion of an assurance of compliance with the Civil Rights Act. He then read 444 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 A a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such a document. Director Purdy, seconded by Director Todd, moved that the resolution be adopted. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": None The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 78-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 3 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION ENDORSING TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GRANT 6.1 The proposed resolution would endorse the Washington County Economic Opportunity Agency application for a rural public transportation program grant. 6.2 Mr. John Squires, representing the Washington County Economic Oppor- tunity Agency, explained the program to the Board and stated that the proposed program was one of two in the state which had been approved. He said the program would provide rural residents, particularly the elderly and handicapped, with access to major trade centers of Washington and Benton counties. Mr. Squires assured the Board that the EOA was not re- questing city funds for the project but rather an endorsement of the grant application to fund the project for two years with 100 percent federal government funds. When questioned by the City Manager about possible sources of funding for the project at the end of the two-year grant period, Mr. Squires said that it was believed the project could be funded by receipts from fares and donations by local civic and govern- mental organizations. The City Manager then stated that the city would assume no financial obligation for the program at this time nor anytime in the future. Mr. Squires requested that the Board remain open to the possibility of the city helping to fund the program at the end of the grant period if the program proved to provide a needed service to the community. 6.3 Discussion completed, the City Attorney read the resolution after which Director Noland, seconded by Director Hughes, moved to adopt the resolution. In roll call vote the following vote was recorded: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Collier, Lancaster "Nays": None Abstain: Purdy The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 79-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 4 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V ORDINANCE PROHIBITING SALE AND USE OF FIREWORKS 6.4 The ordinance had been left on first reading at the September 2, 1975 meeting. The City Attorney stated that he had had no feedback as to a proper definition for "responsible organization" and that if the Board wished to pursue an acceptable definition for the term, the ordinance could be left on second reading. Members of the Board indicated that they preferred the definition to be drafted so as not to be ambiguous. The City Attorney then read the ordinance the second time. 6.5 Mrs. Juanita Carlson, present in the audience, voiced her opposi- tion to the ordinance. Following slight further comment and the Board taking no action on the ordinance, the ordinance was left on second reading. 6 1 REPORT OF BOARD NOMINATING COMMITTEE 111 Chairman of the nominating committee, Director Todd, reported that 7.1 the Board Nominating Committee had nominated persons to fill vacancies on four city committees and one city commission. To serve the unexpired Civil Service Commission term of Mr. Gene 7.2 Thrasher, the committee nominated Mr. Wilson Kimbrough for a term to expire April 1, 1976. Director Collier was then granted the floor and stated: "I would 7.3 like to explain to the press and the Board that we set up a nominating committee at which each member of the Board supplies input to this committee. This committee received the input from three members of the ist Board --Director Purdy, Director Lancaster, and myself. We three nominated bil Monroe Harrison to fill this position on the Civil Service Commission. Tt When we received our ballot, he was not listed as a nominee for this position. This committee took our three votes and put him over into EE another, different committee; and we feel our confidence was betrayed by the Nominating Committee by doing so. Now they have come up with another person and I would like to take a public vote as to how we voted for this Civil Service position." Director Collier then nominated Mr. Monroe Harrison for the vacancy and Director Purdy seconded the motion. Director Todd explained that Mr. Harrison had applied for two different 7.4 committees whereas Mr. Kimbrough had applied only for the Civil Service Commission vacancy. He said the Nominating Committee's decision was an effort to place as many qualified persons as possible on the committees • and should not be construed as being negative against Mr. Harrison. Director Noland, member of the Nominating Committee, said that the com- mittee had considered the preference's for Mr. Harrison .and did not feel the committee's decision was an insult to the three directors preferring Mr. Harrison. He said it was common for the committee to recommend someone for a different committee even though a majority of directors had indicated a preference that he be placed on a specific committee. Following slight further comment, the Mayor asked if the nomination 7.5 of-Mr. Wilson Kimbrough should be accepted. The following vote of the Board was recorded: "Ayes": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton "Nays": None Abstain: Purdy, Collier, Lancaster Mayor Orton declared the nomination approved. Director Todd then reported that the committee's nomination to fill the 7.6 unexpired Community Appearance Committee term of Bianca DeLille to expire January 1, 1976 was Mr. Gerald Klingman. There being no further nominations from the floor, Director Todd moved that the nomination be accepted. The motion was seconded by Director Hughes and in roll call vote of the Board, the motion carried unanimously. Nominations for vacancies to occur October 1, 1975 on the Community 7.7 Development Committee were: Steve Anderson, George Gray, Monroe Harrison, Eleanor Johnson, Lynn Wade, and William West. Terms would expire October 1, 1978. Director Collier nominated Mrs. Gladys Sonneman and Director Purdy nominated Mr. L. M. McGoodwin. 7 0 8.1 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mr. Steve Anderson should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton "Nay": None Abstain: Purdy, Collier, Lancaster The nomination was declared accepted. 8.2 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mr. George Gray should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The nomination was declared accepted. 8.3 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mr. Monroe Harrison should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Purdy The nomination was declared accepted. 8.4 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mrs. Eleanor Johnson should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Purdy The nomination was declared accepted. 8.5 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mr. L. M. McGoodwin should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Purdy, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Collier The nomination was declared rejected. 8.6 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mrs. Gladys Sonneman should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Todd, Noland,Hughes, Orton The nomination was declared rejected. 8.7 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mr. Lynn Wade should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The nomination was declared accepted. 8.8 The Mayor asked if the nomination of Mr. William West should be accepted. The vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy "Nay": None Abstain: Purdy, Collier, Lancaster The nomination was declared accepted. 8.9 Director Todd then reported that nominees for vacancies occuring October 1, 1975 on the Housing Assistance Committee were. Mark Doyle, Larry Smith, and Ruby Bottoms. The terms of each would expire October 1, 1978. There being no nominations from the floor, Director Todd moved that the nominations be accepted. The motion was seconded by Director Hughes and passed unanimously in roll call vote of the Board. r Mr. Charles P. Kirchen was nominated by the Committee to fill a vacancy on the Pollution Control Committee to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Jim Dickson The term expires January 1, 1978. There being no nominations from the floor, Director Todd moved that the nomination be accepted. The motion was seconded by Director Noland and carried unani- mously in roll call vote of the Board PURCHASING ITEMS AND AWARD OF BIDS Bid 293: 3/4 Ton Pickup - Water and Sewer Department: Purchasing Agent Sturman Mackey recommended the bid be awarded to Whit Chevrolet, thelow bidder.in the amount of $4,972.42. Ut Director Hughes, seconded by Director Collier, moved that the bid not be awarded. When the City Manager stated that he had assumed that C1 the city would try to continue providing service in the Water and Sewer Department despite the financial plight of the General and Public Works funds, Director Hughes asked if the Water and Sewer Department would not C2 also be expected to suffer the consequences of reduced revenues. He felt it would be foolish to continue expenditures in one department just because the funds had been budgeted. Mr. Mackey explained that the equip- ment was badly needed to replace older, worn out equipment and stated that the equipment would be a necessary item in view of the extensive water and sewer projects currently underway. The Mayor asked if the motion by Hughes should pass. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Aye": Hughes, Collier "Nay": Todd, Noland, Orton, Purdy, Lancaster The motion was declared failed. Following further discussion and comment, Director Lancaster moved that the bid be awarded as recommended. The motion was seconded by Director Todd and the recorded vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Collier The motion was declared passed. Bid 294: Backhoe and Front-end Loader - Water and Sewer Department: Mr. Mackey recommended the bid be awarded to Northwest Arkansas Equipment Company of Springdlae for the low bid amount of $22,375.26. Following slight discussion, Director Noland, seconded by Director Lancaster, moved that the recommendation be accepted. The recorded roll call vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Collier The motion was declared passed. Bid 295: Tires. Mr. Mackey recommended that the bid be awarded to the low bidder for each item to be purchased on an as -needed basis for use on all city vehicles. Following discussion, Director Lancaster, seconded by Director Todd,moved that the bid be awarded as recommended. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None Abstain: Hughes The motion was declared passed. 9 9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 10 10.1 Bid 291: Crew Cab Pickup - Street Department: The award of the low bid of $5,309.54 submitted by Whit Chevrolet Company was moved by Director Lancaster to be delayed indefinitely. The motion was seconded by Director Purdy. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The motion was declared passed. 10.2 Bid for installation of sewer connections and sewer service lines as programmed in the Community Development projects was recommended to be awarded to Fayetteville Plumbing and Heating Company in the amount of $6,079.05. Mr. Mackey also recommended that the Board adopt a resolu- tion authorizing execution of the contract. 10.3 Following discussion, Director Purdy, seconded by Director Todd, moved that the bid be awarded as recommended and that a resolution authorizing execution of the contract be adopted. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The motion was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 80-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 5 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF GREENLAND SEWER SYSTEM 10.4 The City Manager stated that the resolution would authorize the issuance of a change order to Tri -City Construction Company for the con- struction of a sewer system for the City of Greenland. He said the cost of the project would be borne entirely by the City of Greenland. 10.5 The City Attorney read the resolution after which Director Purdy, seconded by Director Hughes, moved that the resolution be adopted. In roll call vote of the Board the following vote was recorded: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The resolution was declared passed. RESOLUTION NO. 81-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 6 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT - City of Greenland 10.6 The proposed resolution, read by the City Attorney, would authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with the City of Greenland for sewer services. Director Purdy, seconded by Director Todd, moved that the resolution be adopted. The recorded vote of the Board was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The resolution was declared adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 82-75 APPEARS ON PAGE 7 OF ORDINANCE & RESOLUTION BOOK V 10 1 11 RECOMMENDATION FROM FINANCE COMMITTEE Director Lancaster, Chairman of the Board Finance Committee, read 11.1 the following recommendation adopted by that committee: In response to the approaching drastic cutbacks in municipal services 11.2 because of inadequate revenues and in response to the expressed concern of many Fayetteville citizens about these cutbacks, the Board of Directors should ask for an independent task force to be charged with the following: The task force should search for and study alternative 11.3 financial courses of action for the city government. The alternatives to be considered should include service cut- Ut backs, new revenues, and cost savings. This task force 104 should operate independently of the Board of Directors, except that the task force's findings should be summarized COCO and presented by a report to the Board of Directors with recommendations by November 1, 1975. The Board will care - CO fully consider the report. The City Manager and staff should assist the task force in any feasible way requested. It is intended that the task force should represent all Fayetteville 11.4 citizens. In order to implement this goal, presiding officers of the following organizations are invited to participate on the task force: Fayetteville Classroom Teachers Association University of Arkansas Faculty Senate Chamber of Commerce Washington County Bar Association (Fayetteville representative) Northwest Arkansas Labor Council (Fayetteville representative) Council on Aging Board of Realtors Insurance Agents Association Arkansas State Senator or Representative (Fayetteville) Washington County Medical Society (Fayetteville representative) University of Arkansas Students Washington County New Car Dealers Association (Fayetteville representative) Utility companies representative Fayetteville Ministerial Alliance Fayetteville P. T. A. Council Wholesale Building Suppliers Association ACORN Washington County League of Women Voters (Fayetteville representative) University of Arkansas Administration Downtown Fayetteville Unlimited Dickson Street Merchants Association North Fayetteville Businessmen's Association Northwest Arkansas Plaza Merchants Association Industrial plants representative This list is not intended to be inclusive, and the task force may 11.5 choose to add other members. If a significant number of individuals cited above do not choose to participate, the Board of Directors should re-evaluate whether the remaining task force is still representative of Fayetteville citizens. Director Todd suggested that each organization be contacted in an 11.6 attempt to schedule a meeting to "get the ball rolling". Director Collier 11 12 v wished in no way to thwart the endeavors of the task force but wanted the city staff to not be involved in pursuit of a solution. Following further comment and discussion, Director Collier, seconded by Director Todd, moved that the recommendation be adopted. In roll call vote of the Board the following vote was recorded: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The motion was declared passed. RETAIL LIQUOR AND/OR BEER PERMIT APPLICATIONS 12.1 The City Manager brought to the attention of the Board the application for a retail off -premise wine permit for 527 Poplar Street and recommended that the City Attorney be instructed to oppose the application on the basis that the location of the permit in an I-1 zoning district would be contra- dictory to city ordinance. The City Attorney stated that he had requested that he be notified of any hearings pertaining to applications being opposed by the city but has yet to receive such notification. 12.2 Director Lancaster, seconded by Director Noland, moved that the City Attorney be instructed to oppose the application for 527 Poplar Street and an application for 737 Leverett Street if that application is in violation of city ordinance. In roll call vote of the Board the recorded vote was: "Aye": Todd, Noland, Hughes, Orton, Purdy, Collier, Lancaster "Nay": None The motion was declared passed. ADJOURNMENT 12.3 There being no further business for the Board's consideration, and with approval of the Board, Mayor Orton declared the meeting adjourned. r APPROVED: ATTEST: Darlene Westbrook, City Clerk arson R. Orton, Mayor 12