HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-07-13 Minutes1 SPECIAL
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
July 13, 1970
The Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, met in special
session on Monday, July 13, 1970, in the Directors Room in the City Administration
Building at 7:30 p.m.
Present: City Manager Wesley M. Howe, City Clerk Marilyn Moore, and Directors
Jones, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, and Dunn.
Absent: City Attorney David Malone and Directors Lancaster and Starr.
Representatives of the Press were present.
1-124 The Mayor reported that the purpose of the meeting was to hold a public hearing
on the question of whether or not to authorize improvements on Storer Avenue
from Holly Street to North Street, Holly Street from Leverett Avenue to Oakland
Avenue and Hazel Street from Leverett Avenue to Oakland Avenue; determine the
sufficiency of the petiton requesting improvements to said streets; and to
authorize improvements to said streets; to hold a public hearing on the
question of whether or not to authorize improvements to Lawson Street from
Sang Avenue to Porter Road; determine the sufficiency of the petition requesting
improvement to said street; and to authorize improvement to said street, and
the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the Board
of Directors.
The Mayor reported that all Directors had been notified of the special meeting
in person at the last regular meeting of the Directors on July 6,1970 and by
U. S. Mail.
Director Lancaster and Director Starr were unable to attend but have waived
notice of the Special Meeting.
WAIVER OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
FAYETTEVILLE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2-124 Comes now the undersigned, being a duly elected, qualified and acting member
of the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and speci-
fically waives notice of a special meeting of the Fayetteville Board of Directors
to be held in the Directors Room of the City Administration Building, Fayette-
ville, Arkansas, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., on July 13, 1970,
3-124 The Mayor reported that this was the e and the place set for a public hearing
to determine whether or not to aut ize improvements to Storer Avenue from
Holly Street to North Street, Holly Street from Leverett Avenue to Oakland Ave-
nue and Hazel Street from Leverett Avenue to Oakland Avenue.
The City Manager introduced, and at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed
resolution in its entirety declaring SIGNERS OF THE PETITION REQUESTING IMPROVE-
MENT TO STORER AVENUE FROM HOLLY STREET TO NORTH STREET; HOLLY STREET FROM
LEVERETT AVENUE TO OAKLAND AVENUE; AND HAZEL STREET FROM LEVERETT AVENUE TO
OAKLAND AVENUE TO BE SUFFICIENT.
11PL9
N
Director McFerran moved that the Resolution be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Director Swartz, and upon roll call the following
' vote was recorded: "Aye" Jones, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, and Dunn.
"Nay" none. There being five "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the
Resolution adopted.
* Resolution No. 35-70 is on page 72 of Ordinance and Resolution Book 1.
The City Manager introduced, and at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed 1-125
ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZ-
ING THE IMPROVEMENT OF STORER AVENUE FROM HOLLY STREET TO NORTH STREET; HOLLY
STREET FROM OAKLAND AVENUE TO LEVERETT AVENUE; AND HAZEL STREET FROM OAKLAND
AVENUE TO LEVERETT AVENUE; LEVYING ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY BENEFITED
THEREBY; STATING THE MANNER IN WHICH SUCH ASSESSMENTS ARE PAYABLE; AND STATING
THE TIME WITHIN WHICH SAID ASSESSMENTS ARE PAYABLE."
Director Jones moved that the rule he suspended and that the Ordinance be
placed on second reading.
The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The
Ordinance was then read for the second time.
Director Swartz moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance
be placed on third and final reading.
The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The
Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then declared
the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, the Mayor asked
the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following vote
was recorded: "Aye" Jones, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, and Dunn.
"Nay" none. There being five "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the
' Ordinance passed.
* Ordinance No. 1751 is on page 252 of Ordinance and Resolution Book 1.
The Mayor reported that this was the time and the place set for a public hearing 2-125
to determine whether or not to authorize improvement to Lawson Street from Sang
Avenue to Porter Road.
The City Manager introduced, and at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed
resolution in its entirety declaring SIGNERS OF THE PETITION REQUESTING IMPROVE-
MENT TO LAWSON STREET FROM SANG AVENUE TO PORTER ROAD TO BE SUFFICIENT.
Director Dunn moved that the Resolution be adopted.
The motion was seconded by Director Swartz, and upon roll call the following
vote was recorded: "Aye" Jones, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, and Dunn.
"Nay" none. There being five "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the
Resolution adopted.
* Resolution No. 36-70 is on page 73 of Ordinance and Resolution Book 1.
The City Manager introduced, and at the request of the Mayor, read a proposed 3-125
ordinance in its entirety for the first time entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZ-
ING THE IMPROVEMENT OF LAWSON STREET FROM SANG AVENUE TO PORTER ROAD; LEVYING
ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY; STATING THE MANNER IN WHICH
SUCH ASSESSMENTS ARE PAYABLE; AND STATING THE TIME WITHIN WHICH SAID ASSESS-
MENTS ARE PAYABLE."
Director McFerran moved that the rule be suspended and that the Ordinance be
placed on second reading.
The motion was seconded by Director Jones and passed unanimously. The Ordi-
nance was then read for the second time.
Director Swartz moved that the rule be further suspended and that the Ordinance
be placed on third and final reading.
125
41
1 1-126
The motion was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously. The
Ordinance was then read for the third and last time. The Mayor then declared '
the Ordinance open for discussion. There being no discussion, the Mayor
asked the question, "Shall the Ordinance pass?" Upon roll call the following
vote was recorded: "Aye" Jones, Swartz, McFerran, Melton, and Dunn.
"Nay" none. There being five "Ayes" and no "Nays", the Mayor declared the
Ordinance passed.
* Ordinance No. 1752 is on page 254 of Ordinance and Resolution Book 1,
Mr. Jerry Marshal appeared at the meeting as the representative of the Council
on Aging, Inc. and requested the City Attorney's opinion on the question of
whether or not the City could contribute to their organization. Mayor Melton
reported that the City Attorney had reported to him that there is enabling
legislation which permits the City to contribute to organizations such as
the Council on Aging, Inc. Mayor Melton reported to Mr. Marshal that it was
impossible to commit funds from the current budget. Director Dunn suggested
that the City Manager send a memo to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
asking them to consider allocating part of their funds in the preparation of
the coming budget for use by the Council on Aging, Inc. Director Dunn also
suggested that the City Manager give thought to contributing funds to this
organization in his preparation of the General Budget for 1971 and to use
his own discretion to decide the amount.
There being no further business, Director Jones moved to adjourn. The motion
was seconded by Director McFerran and passed unanimously, whereupon the Mayor
declared the meeting adjourned.
APPROVED:y /�
C. G. MELTON, JR., MAYO.
ATTEST: / (I
MARILYN MO RE, CITY CLERK
126